Search

Current pancreatic function tests are cumbersome and unavailable to the clinical gastroenterologist. We have developed a function test that can be modified to a purely endoscopic collection method (ePFT). The aim of this study was to compare the endoscopic and traditional Dreiling tube collection methods.Two separate groups of healthy subjects and patients with chronic pancreatitis underwent pancreatic function testing. One group underwent the endoscopic collection method (ePFT). Intravenous cholecystokinin (CCK 40 ng x kg(-1) x h(-1)) was started in preprocedure area. Duodenal fluid was collected with upper endoscope during endoscopy at 30, 40, 50, and 60 minutes during infusion. Another group underwent the traditional Dreiling collection method. Intravenous CCK was started in postprocedure area after endoscopic tube placement. Duodenal fluid was collected at 0, 20, 40, 60, and 80 minutes during infusion. Lipase concentration was determined (IU/L) on laboratory autoanalyzer.Seventy-three patients were studied. Thirty-four underwent endoscopic collection and 39 underwent Dreiling collection. The mean peak lipase concentrations (+/- standard deviation) for healthy subjects and patients with chronic pancreatitis in the endoscopic collection method group were 1612500 +/- 556152 IU/L and 369594 +/- 281624 IU/L, respectively (P0.001). The mean peak lipase concentrations (+/- standard deviation) for healthy subjects and patients with chronic pancreatitis in the Dreiling tube collection method group were 1670324 +/- 786731 IU/L and 478956 +/- 406061 IU/L, respectively (P0.001). There was no statistical difference between collection methods at distinguishing healthy subjects and patients with chronic pancreatitis. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) for the endoscopic and Dreiling collection methods were 0.993 (standard error of mean, 0.009) and 0.921 (standard error of mean, 0.041). A lipase concentration cut point of 810600 IU/L distinguishes healthy subjects from patients with chronic pancreatitis with a sensitivity and specificity of 92% and 95%, respectively. The ePFT was safe, short in duration, minimized costs (US dollars 1890 vs. US dollars 2659), required small amounts of fluid for analysis (1-3 mL), and eliminated radiation exposure.Analysis of timed endoscopic aspirations of pancreatic juice after hormonal stimulation can distinguish healthy subjects from patients with chronic pancreatitis. This new endoscopic collection method (ePFT) is less cumbersome and more time efficient, when compared to traditional collection methods. The ePFT broadens the availability of function testing to the practicing clinical gastroenterologist.

Background & Aims: Propofol is increasingly used for gastrointestinal endoscopy because of its rapid recovery profile. There has been no prospective, randomized comparison of gastroenterologist-administered propofol to meperidine and midazolam for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography. Additionally, its cost-effectiveness has not been studied. Methods: Seventy-five randomized patients received either gastroenterologist-administered propofol (n = 38) or meperidine/midazolam (n = 37) for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography. Monitoring with capnography allowed for rapid titration of propofol at the earliest signs of respiratory depression. Visual analogue scales measured tolerance and satisfaction. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed by using return to baseline for both activity and food intake 24 hours after the procedure as the effectiveness measure. Results: The groups had similar physiological outcomes and satisfaction. Patients receiving propofol had shorter recovery times ( P P = 0.028). With incremental cost-effectiveness analysis, gastroenterologist-administered propofol cost an additional $403.00 per additional patient at 100% of baseline for both activity level and food intake when compared with standard sedation and analgesia. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the only model in which propofol administration would become the dominant strategy was with its administration by a registered nurse. Conclusions: Gastroenterologist-administered propofol using monitoring with capnography is similar to meperidine/midazolam for both physiological outcomes and patient/endoscopist satisfaction. Propofol leads to significantly improved recovery of baseline activity and food intake 24 hours after the procedure. Our model suggests that propofol would be more cost-effective than meperidine and midazolam for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography if registered nurse administration were possible. GASTROENTEROLOGY 2002;123:8-16

Recommendations from the American Society of Anesthesiologists suggest that monitoring for apnea using the detection of exhaled carbon dioxide (capnography) is a useful adjunct in the assessment of ventilatory status of patients undergoing sedation and analgesia. There are no data on the utility of capnography in GI endoscopy, nor is the frequency of abnormal ventilatory activity during endoscopy known. The aims of this study were to determine the following: (1) the frequency of abnormal ventilatory activity during therapeutic upper endoscopy, (2) the sensitivity of observation and pulse oximetry in the detection of apnea or disordered respiration, and (3) whether capnography provides an improvement over accepted monitoring techniques.Forty-nine patients undergoing therapeutic upper endoscopy were monitored with standard methods including pulse oximetry, automated blood pressure measurement, and visual assessment. In addition, graphic assessment of respiratory activity with sidestream capnography was performed in all patients. Endoscopy personnel were blinded to capnography data. Episodes of apnea or disordered respiration detected by capnography were documented and compared with the occurrence of hypoxemia, hypercapnea, hypotension, and the recognition of abnormal respiratory activity by endoscopy personnel.Comparison of simultaneous respiratory rate measurements obtained by capnography and by auscultation with a pretracheal stethoscope verified that capnography was an excellent indicator of respiratory rate when compared with the reference standard (auscultation) (r = 0.967, p0.001). Fifty-four episodes of apnea or disordered respiration occurred in 28 patients (mean duration 70.8 seconds). Only 50% of apnea or disordered respiration episodes were eventually detected by pulse oximetry. None were detected by visual assessment (p0.0010).Apnea/disordered respiration occurs commonly during therapeutic upper endoscopy and frequently precedes the development of hypoxemia. Potentially important abnormalities in respiratory activity are undetected with pulse oximetry and visual assessment.

OBJECTIVE: The “ringed” or “corrugated” esophagus is a cause of chronic dysphagia and recurrent food impactions in young men. It was previously believed to be a congenital condition, but recent case series have documented histological esophagitis in these patients. We have treated 19 patients with a ringed esophagus and are impressed that this represents an acquired condition with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as its etiology. Our goals are to present the largest case series to date of ringed esophagus, discuss the evidence for GERD, and suggest a strategy for its diagnosis and management. METHODS: The charts of 19 patients with a ringed esophagus were reviewed. A single pathologist interpreted all available esophageal biopsy specimens and graded them for the presence of GERD-related abnormalities. Phone interviews were conducted to assess response to therapy and confirm historical features obtained from medical records. RESULTS: The typical patient is a young man (median age 35, M:F 17:2) with long-standing dysphagia and multiple food impactions. Endoscopy revealed multiple concentric rings that persisted despite air insufflation and caused significant stenosis. Of the 11 patients with available histology, all had basal cell hyperplasia, papillomatosis, and an increased number of intraepithelial eosinophils. Other clinical features of GERD such as heartburn, endoscopic esophagitis, and hiatal hernia were often absent. Response to dilation and acid suppression was good. CONCLUSIONS: The uniform presence of histological esophagitis with intraepithelial eosinophils, basal cell hyperplasia, and papillary lengthening strongly implicates GERD in the pathogenesis of the adult ringed esophagus. In addition to a series of gradual esophageal dilations, we suggest using a proton pump inhibitor to provide acid suppression.

Practice guidelines call for the careful titration of sedatives and analgesics during endoscopy, with time taken between incremental doses to assess effect. This approach is time-consuming and has never been validated in a prospective trial. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of titration, as outlined in practice guidelines, with a single, rapid bolus of sedatives before colonoscopy.Consecutive colonoscopy outpatients were randomized to a single, rapid bolus of meperidine and midazolam or to a titration of doses every 3 min until predefined levels of somnolence were achieved. The colonoscopist was not present during sedation and remained blinded as to which technique was used. Supplemental O2 was given for SaO290% on three or more occasions. Total physician time was calculated from the first injection of sedatives to the removal of the colonoscope. Patient assessments of pain and tolerance were obtained at the time of discharge using visual analog scales of 100 mm (0 = excellent and 100 = unbearable).A total of 101 patients were randomized (49 bolus, 52 titration). Demographic features were similar for both groups. Titration required more physician time than did bolus (32.2 min vs 20.1 min, p0.001) and was associated with an increased need for supplemental O2 (44% vs 14%, p = 0.002). Mean tolerance scores were similar (titration 16.3 vs bolus 15.3, p = 0.72).Rapid bolus sedation for colonoscopy saves significant endoscopist time, is associated with less O2 desaturation, and provides equivalent levels of patient comfort. A revision of the guidelines for sedation and analgesia during endoscopy should be considered.

Background: Traditional methods of sedation and analgesia for advanced endoscopic procedures can be inadequate and frequently prolong recovery room observation. Propofol is a rapidly acting agent that produces an excellent hypnotic state, but its use is typically limited to anesthesiologist-assisted cases because of the inadequacy of current monitoring standards to reliably detect early stages of respiratory depression. Methods: Ten patients undergoing advanced upper endoscopic procedures (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic ultrasound, esophageal stent placement) received a propofol infusion under the control of a second qualified gastroenterologist with advanced cardiac life support skills. Graphic assessment of respiratory activity was made by using a sidestream carbon dioxide detecting cannula. Patient satisfaction was measured with a 100 mm visual analog scale. Recovery scores were measured by standardized scoring of discharge criteria. Results: Monitoring with graphic assessment of respiratory activity detected early phases of respiratory depression, resulting in a timely decrease in the propofol infusion without significant hypoxemia, hypercapnia, hypotension, or arrhythmias. Satisfaction scores were extremely high (median score 92 of 100) and 9 of 10 patients met discharge criteria at 15 minutes after discontinuation of the propofol infusion. Conclusions: With the use of monitoring by graphic assessment of respiratory activity, propofol infusion by a second qualified gastroenterologist for prolonged upper endoscopic procedures is safe and results in high levels of patient satisfaction with rapid recovery times.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS Hormonal stimulatory agents are used to assess pancreatic function. Biologically derived secretin, the most widely used pancreatic secretagogue, is no longer available in the United States. Existing secretory tests using cholecystokinin alone are cumbersome, requiring a unique dual tube (gastric and duodenal) collection system and constant perfusion of a nonabsorbable marker to calculate enzyme output (in international units [IU]). A simpler, quantitative cholecystokinin stimulation test that measures enzyme concentrations (in international units per liter [IU/L]) instead of total output would obviate need for marker perfusion/collection. The aim of our experiment was to study the secretory patterns of pancreatic enzyme concentration in duodenal fluid after cholecystokinin stimulation in healthy volunteers. METHODOLOGY Healthy subjects had a Dreiling tube inserted endoscopically into the ligament of Treitz. Gastric and duodenal aspiration ports were connected to low intermittent suction. A 20-minute baseline was obtained to clear the gastric and duodenal lumina of residual fluid. Cholecystokinin was infused at a constant rate of 40 ng/kg per hour. Duodenal fluid was collected on ice for 80 minutes in four 20-minute aliquots. Aspirated fluid was analyzed for enzyme concentration with an automated chemistry analyzer in the hospital biochemistry laboratory. RESULTS Nineteen healthy volunteers were studied. The mean volume (+/-SEM) of duodenal fluid collected was 85 +/- 4.4 mL (range, 48 to 118 mL). Fluid analysis revealed a significant rise in mean lipase concentration (+/-SEM) from a baseline of 595,680 +/- 11,930 IU/L to a peak of 1,778,847 +/- 171,204 IU/L (mean difference = 1,183,167 IU/L; 95% CI= 664,459 IU/L to 1,701,875 IU/L; < 0.001, Student test). Increases in amylase concentrations were markedly less pronounced and did not reach statistical significance. Mean peak lipase concentration occurred within 50 minutes of acinar cell stimulation. All patients tolerated tube placement, and there were no episodes of acute pancreatitis or abdominal pain. CONCLUSIONS Pancreatic lipase concentrations in duodenal fluid increase nearly threefold after cholecystokinin stimulation in healthy volunteers. This magnitude of enzyme secretory response may be a marker of pancreatic function and could potentially lead to a more clinically useful and simpler pancreatic function test. This physiologic study serves as the basis for our further investigations of cholecystokinin-stimulated lipase concentrations as a new test in the assessment of pancreatic insufficiency.

Hormonal stimulation with secretin or cholecystokinin (CCK) is the most sensitive means of assessing pancreatic function. Secretin is not available, and current CCK tests are cumbersome, requiring dual tube intubation and marker perfusion techniques. The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of a new CCK-stimulated pancreatic function test measuring peak lipase concentration.A Dreiling gastroduodenal tube was inserted to the ligament of Treitz, and fluid was collected on ice for 80 min in four 20-min aliquots. CCK was infused i.v. at a constant rate of 40 ng/kg/h. Gastric aspirations were discarded. Duodenal aspirates were analyzed for volume and enzyme concentration with a clinical laboratory autoanalyzer.Nineteen healthy volunteers and 18 chronic pancreatitis patients were studied. Lipase concentration and secretory volume showed a peak response by 40 min of stimulation, whereas amylase response was variable. The mean peak lipase concentrations (+/-SEM) for normal volunteers and mild, moderate, and advanced chronic pancreatitis patients were 16.9+/-1.9, 7.9+/-1.7, 3.7+/-1.2, and 2.1+/-0.6 x 10 5 IU/L, respectively. Lower peak lipase concentrations were significantly associated with more advanced chronic pancreatitis (p0.001). The receiver operating characteristic curve area for all chronic pancreatitis patients was 0.944 (95% CI = 0.825-0.985). A peak lipase concentration of 780,000 IU/L provided a sensitivity and specificity of 0.833 and 0.867, respectively. This CCK test was well tolerated and without complications.Lipase concentration in duodenal fluid increases nearly 3-fold from baseline after CCK stimulation in healthy volunteers but is markedly reduced in patients with chronic pancreatic disease. Peak lipase concentration is a significant predictor of chronic pancreatitis and correlates with severity of pancreatic disease. Aspiration of duodenal drainage fluid with a Dreiling tube and analysis with a laboratory autoanalyzer are less cumbersome than marker perfusion and back titration techniques. Measurement of enzyme concentration instead of output could lead to the development of an endoscopic or through-the-scope screening method for assessing patients with suspected chronic pancreatitis or chronic abdominal pain.

Background: Approximately 40% of endoscopy costs are related to sedation, monitoring, and recovery. Anesthesiologists have developed scoring systems to determine when patients (pts) can be safely released after outpatient surgery. Criteria specific to endoscopic practice are lacking, and many endoscopy centers arbitrarily hold pts in recovery 30 minutes (min) before discharge (D/C). Aims: To develop criteria for determining homereadiness after sedated endoscopic procedures. To determine predictors that allow "fast-tracking" of pts for early D/C home. Methods: We developed a new discharge scoring system (DSS) by modifying the postanesthesia discharge score (PADS) for endoscopic practice (see table). The DSS evaluates 5 parameters of recovery (each scored 0-2, max 10/10). DSS scores of 9/10 or 10/10 are considered compatible with safe D/C. An investigator followed colonoscopy outpatients into the recovery room (RR) and obtained DSS scores every 15 min until D/C. Per protocol, endoscopy nurses followed pts in recovery for 30 min before independently assessing their readiness for D/C. All pts had received sedation with IV meperidine/midazolam (mean dose 73.9/2.9 mgs). Results: 100 pts were studied (M/F 49/51, mean age 48.8 yrs). 77/100 pts fulfilled D/C criteria at 15 min (DSS > 9). Further observation of these 77 pts to 30 min revealed no deterioration in DSS score or problems precluding safe D/C. In fact, all patients with a 15- min DSS > 9 were subsequently released at 30 min by the RR nurse (blinded to DSS score). Univariate analysis found supplemental O2requirement (due to sustained desaturation during colonoscopy) the clinical variable most closely linked to DSS score. Pts not requiring O2had an 87% (61/70) chance of meeting D/C criteria (DSS > 9) at 15 min compared to only 46% (14/30) of pts requiring O2(p