Search

Fragmentation of outpatient care is a substantial barrier to creation and maintenance of hemodialysis access. To improve patient accessibility, satisfaction, and multidisciplinary provider communication, we created a monthly Saturday multidisciplinary vascular surgery and interventional nephrology access clinic at a tertiary care hospital in a major urban area for the complicated hemodialysis patient population. The study included patients presenting for new access creation as well as those who had previously undergone access surgery. Staffing included two to three interventional nephrologists, two to three vascular surgeons, one medical assistant, one research assistant, and one practice assistant. Patient satisfaction and perception of the clinic was measured using surveys during six of the monthly Saturday hemodialysis clinics. A total of 675 patient encounters were completed (18.2 average/clinic ±6.3 standard deviation) from August 2016 to August 2019. All patients were seen by both disciplines. The average no-show rate was 19.9% throughout the study period. Patient satisfaction in all measures was consistently high with the Saturday clinic. Providers were also assayed, and they generally valued the real-time, multidisciplinary care plan generation, and its subsequent efficient execution. Saturday multidisciplinary hemodialysis access clinics offer high provider and patient satisfaction and streamlined patient care. However, no-show rates remain relatively high for this challenging patient population.

(1) Background: Vascular surgery operations are hampered by high failure rates and frequent occurrence of peri-operative cardiovascular complications. In pre-clinical studies, pre-operative restriction of proteins and/or calories (PCR) has been shown to limit ischemia-reperfusion damage, slow intimal hyperplasia, and improve metabolic fitness. However, whether these dietary regimens are feasible and safe in the vascular surgery patient population remains unknown. (2) Methods: We performed a randomized controlled trial in patients scheduled for any elective open vascular procedure. Participants were randomized in a 3:2 ratio to either four days of outpatient pre-operative PCR (30% calorie, 70% protein restriction) or their regular ad-libitum diet. Blood was drawn at baseline, pre-operative, and post-operative day 1 timepoints. A leukocyte subset flow cytometry panel was performed at these timepoints. Subcutaneous/perivascular adipose tissue was sampled and analyzed. Follow-up was one year post-op. (3) Results: 19 patients were enrolled, of whom 11 completed the study. No diet-related reasons for non-completion were reported, and there was no intervention group crossover. The PCR diet induced weight loss and BMI decrease without malnutrition. Insulin sensitivity was improved after four days of PCR (p = 0.05). Between diet groups, there were similar rates of re-intervention, wound infection, and cardiovascular complications. Leukocyte populations were maintained after four days of PCR. (4) Conclusions: Pre-operative PCR is safe and feasible in elective vascular surgery patients., Nutrients, 13 (11), ISSN:2072-6643

Background: Open vascular surgery interventions are not infrequently hampered by complication rates and durability. Preclinical surgical models show promising beneficial effects in modulating the host response to surgical injury via short-term dietary preconditioning. Here, we explore short-term protein–calorie restriction preconditioning in patients undergoing elective carotid endarterectomy to understand patient participation dynamics and practicalities of robust research approaches around nutritional/surgical interventions. Methods: We designed a pilot prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. After a 3:2 randomization to a 3-day preoperative protein–calorie restriction regimen (30% calorie/70% protein restriction) or ad libitum group, blood, clinical parameters, and stool samples were collected at baseline, pre-op, and post-op days 1 and 30. Subcutaneous and perivascular adipose tissues were harvested periprocedurally. Samples were analyzed for standard chemistries and cell counts, adipokines. Bacterial DNA isolation and 16S rRNA sequencing were performed on stool samples and the relative abundance of bacterial species was measured. Results: Fifty-one patients were screened, 9 patients consented to the study, 5 were randomized, and 4 completed the trial. The main reason for non-consent was a 3-day in-hospital stay. All 4 participants were randomized to the protein–calorie restriction group, underwent successful endarterectomy, reported no compliance difficulties, nor were there adverse events. Stool analysis trended toward increased abundance of the sulfide-producing bacterial species Bilophila wadsworthia after dietary intervention ( P = .08). Conclusions: Although carotid endarterectomy patients held low enthusiasm for a 3-day preoperative inpatient stay, there were no adverse effects in this small cohort. Multidisciplinary longitudinal research processes were successfully executed throughout the nutritional/surgical intervention. Future translational endeavors into dietary preconditioning of vascular surgery patients should focus on outpatient approaches.

Objective Informed consent is an essential principle of high-quality health care. A core component of surgical informed consent is patient comprehension of basic information such as the diagnosis, risks, benefits, and alternatives of the proposed surgery. We sought to assess informed consent among vascular surgery patients and the association between frailty, education, decisional conflict, and patient comprehension. Methods We tested patient comprehension of basic information required for informed consent with a procedure-specific questionnaire in 102 consecutive patients undergoing selected vascular surgery procedures. Two patients who underwent open aortic aneurysm repair were excluded because of small sample size. All patients underwent assessment using the decisional conflict scale and the Frail/Nondisabled questionnaire. Analyses were performed to determine relationships between being informed and frailty, education level, and decisional conflict score. Patients included in this cohort had a median age of 71 years, and 25%, 14%, 28%, and 33% underwent carotid endarterectomy, endovascular aortic aneurysm repair, dialysis access creation, and percutaneous lower extremity procedures. Results Overall, 14% of patients were classified as “informed” and correctly answered all questions. Procedure type (P = .001), consent obtained by the attending surgeon vs a trainee (P = .04), and frailty score (P = .005) were all associated with whether a patient was informed or not. However, after multivariable adjustment, only frailty score was independently associated with being informed (odds ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.95; P = .03). The median decisional conflict scale score was 7.8, suggesting that patients feel well informed and supported in spite of poor understanding of procedural indications, risks, benefits, and alternatives. Conclusions As a group, patients have a poor comprehension of basic information related to surgical informed consent. These findings have potential ethical and clinical implications, and additional work is required to best determine causes of poor comprehension and strategies to mitigate the same.