Search

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To report the clinical and radiological outcomes for screw track augmentation with fibular allograft in revision of loose pedicle screws associated with significant bone loss along the screw track. Methods: Thirty consecutive patients, 18 men (60%) and 12 women (40%), with a mean age 52 years (range 34- 68). Fibular allograft was prepared by cutting it into longitudinal strips 50 mm in length. Three allograft struts were inserted into the screw track. Six mm tap used to tap between the 3 fibular struts. Eight- or 9-mm diameter, and 45 or 50 mm in length screw was then inserted. The clinical outcomes were assessed by means of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain for clinical outcome. Computed tomography scan (CT) performed at 12 months postoperative visit to assess fibular graft incorporation along the pedicle screw track, any screw loosening and the interbody as well as posterolateral fusion. Results: At a mean follow up of 29 months, there were statically significant improvement in the ODI and VAS for back and leg pain. CT scan obtained at last follow-up showed incorporation of fibular allograft and solid fusion in all patients except one. Conclusion: The fibular allograft augmentation of the pedicle screw track in revision of loose pedicle screws associated with significant bone loss is a viable option. It allows for biologic fixation at the screw-bone interface and has some key advantages when compared to currently available methods.

The extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) muscle is an integral extensor and abductor of the wrist. It originates from the lateral epicondyle of the humerus, laying deep to the extensor carpi radialis longus and extensor digitorum communis, and superficial to the supinator. Insertion occurs at the base of the third metacarpal. The radial nerve or a derivative supplies innervation. Its significance in orthopedics is highlighted by its involvement in multiple surgical approaches, such as the Thompson and Kaplan approaches for exposure of the radius, as well as its association with several routinely observed pathologies. Many of the associated syndromes, such as lateral epicondylitis, arise from repetitive gripping motions or overuse and are frequently seen in the orthopedic clinic. This review seeks to provide a comprehensive summary of the relevance of the ECRB to the orthopedic setting to broaden knowledge of its anatomy and increase recognition and proper management of associated pathologies.

BACKGROUND Allograft interbody spacers are utilized during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) to reestablish anterior column support and disc height. While the TLIF technique offers many improvements over previous surgical methods, instrumentation and bone graft-related complications such as spacer misplacement or migration, screw fracture or misplacement, or rod breakage continue to be reported. The objective of this manuscript is to report on a fractured allograft interbody spacer that displaced into the neural foramen and resulted in impingement on the exiting nerve root that required revision. CASE SUMMARY A 50-year-old male had two-level TLIF with immediate post-operative right L5 radiculopathy. Computed tomography scan demonstrated a fractured allograft interbody spacer that displaced into the right neural foramen and impinged on the exiting L5 nerve root. Revision surgery was performed to remove the broken allograft fragments from the right L5 foramen and the intact portion of the spacer was left in place. The right leg L5 radicular pain resolved. At the last follow up 12 mo after the index procedure, computed tomography scan confirmed sound interbody and posterolateral fusion. CONCLUSION Displacement of broken allograft interbody spacer following TLIF procedures can result in neurological sequelae that require revision. To avoid such an occurrence, the authors recommend allowing sufficient time for the reconstitution of the graft in saline prior to use to decrease brittleness, to use an impactor size that is as close as possible to the spacer size and meticulous inspection of the cortical allograft spacer for any visible imperfection prior to insertion.

Case. Compartment syndrome following muscle rupture is a rare entity with few mentions in the literature. We present a case of pectoralis major rupture in a 38-year-old male that evolved into compartment syndrome of the anterior compartment of the arm. Rupture of the pectoralis is uncommon and most often occurs during weight lifting. Compartment syndrome secondary to this injury is extremely uncommon, with only one reported case in the pectoralis major itself and several cases of biceps compartment syndrome. Due to the potentially devastating consequences of a missed compartment syndrome, it is imperative that physicians maintain a high level of suspicion in patients with these unusual injuries presenting with severe swelling and pain.

Systematic review of dynamization vs exchange nailing for delayed/non-union femoral fractures

AIM To compare infection rates in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures using antibiotic impregnated bone cement (AIBC) to those rates in procedures not using AIBC. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in search for randomized controlled trials/studies (RCTs) pertaining to the field of antibiotic AIBC vs non-AIBC groups in both primary and revision TKA procedures. The primary literature search performed was to identify all RCTs that assessed AIBC in primary and revision TKA procedures. This search was done strictly through the PubMed database using the article “filters” setting that identified and separated all RCTs from the overall search. The original search was “Primary/revision total knee arthroplasty using AIBC”. Other key terms and phrases were included in the search as well. Eligible articles that were used in the “results” of this review met the following criteria: (1) Involved primary or revision TKA procedures (for any reason); (2) included TKA outcome infection rate information; (3) analyzed an AIBC group vs a non-AIBC control group; (4) were found through the RCT filter or hand search in PubMed; and (5) published 1985-2017. Exclusion criteria was as follows: (1) Patients that were not undergoing primary or revision TKA procedures; (2) articles that did not separate total hip arthroplasity (THA) vs TKA results if both hip and knee revisions were evaluated; (3) papers that did not follow up on clinical outcomes of the procedure; (4) extrapolation of data was not possible given published results; (5) knee revisions not done on human patients; (6) studies that were strictly done on THAs; (7) articles that were not found through the RCT filter or through hand search in PubMed; (8) articles that did not evaluate AIBC used in a prosthesis or a spacer during revision; (9) articles that did not compare an AIBC group vs a non-AIBC control group; and (10) articles that were published before 1985. RESULTS In total, 11 articles were deemed eligible for this analysis. Nine of the 11 studies dealt with primary TKA procedures comparing AIBC to non-AIBC treatment. The other two studies dealt with revision TKA procedures that compared such groups. From these papers, 4092 TKA procedures were found. 3903 of these were primary TKAs, while 189 were revision TKAs. Of the 3903 primary TKAs, 1979 of these used some form of AIBC while 1924 were part of a non-AIBC control group. Of the 189 revision TKAs, 96 of these used some form of AIBC while 93 were part of a non-AIBC control group. Average follow-up times of 47.2 mo and 62.5 mo were found in primary and revision groups respectively. A two-tailed Fisher’s exact test was done to check if infection rates differed significantly between the groups. In the primary TKA group, a statistically significant difference between AIBC and non-AIBC groups was not found (AIBC infection rate = 23/1979, non-AIBC infection rate = 35/1924, P = 0.1132). In the revision TKA group, a statistically significant difference between the groups was found (AIBC infection rate = 0/96, non-AIBC infection rate = 7/93, P = 0.0062). No statistically significant differences existed in Knee Society Scores, Hospital for Special Surgery Scores, or Loosening Rates. CONCLUSION AIBC did not have a significant effect on primary TKA infection rates. AIBC did have a significant effect on revision TKA infection rates.

Intraoperative fluoroscopy has facilitated improvements in surgical procedures across various subspecialties but has resulted in increased radiation exposure to the patient and surgeon. The results of a survey administered to 447 orthopedic surgeons and radiological technologists show that there is no standard universal c-arm language, that significant confusion and miscommunication exists between surgeons and technologists because of this, that unnecessary radiation exposure occurs as a direct consequence of this miscommunication, and that the vast majority of respondents would accept a standardized language similar to the one proposed in this study. This could potentially lead to less miscommunication and radiation exposure.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is indicated for completely displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) in elderly community ambulators. Compared to open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and hemiarthroplasty (HA), THA has favorable outcomes in this population. Cementless fixation with prophylactic cabling is the technique of choice. THA is costlier for hip fractures than for osteoarthritis, but is cost effective for FNF given its lower rate of revision than HA or ORIF. Postoperative home discharge with a home exercise program in appropriate patients may effectively control costs while optimizing outcome.

Isolated dislocations of the scaphoid are extremely uncommon injuries and are often associated with significant ligamentous failures. Since scaphoid dislocations typically present with associated carpal fractures, few cases of isolated dislocations of the scaphoid exist in the literature. The proposed treatment options in the literature range from closed reduction and casting to open reduction and internal fixation. We present the case of a 41-year-old male with an isolated scaphoid dislocation in whom open reduction and internal fixation was performed with K-wires. At five months follow-up, the patient had returned to work and all desired activities.

AIM To analyze the literature on efficacy of dynamamization vs exchange nailing in treatment of delayed and non-union femur fractures. METHODS Ultimately, 31 peer-reviewed articles with 644 exchanged nailing patients and 131 dynamization patients were identified and analyzed. The following key words were inputted in different combinations in order to search the field of publications in its entirety: “non-union”, “delayed union”, “ununited”, “femur fracture”, “femoral fracture”, “exchange nailing”, “dynaiz(s)ation”, “secondary nailing”, “dynamic”, “static”, and “nail revision”. The initial search yielded over 150 results, and was refined based on the inclusion criteria: Only studies reporting on humans, non-unions and delayed unions, and the usage of exchange nailing and/or dynamization as a secondary treatment after failed IM nailing. The resulting 66 articles were obtained through online journal access. The results were filtered further based on the exclusion criteria: No articles that failed to report overall union rates, differentiate between success rates of their reported techniques, or articles that analyzed less than 5 patients. RESULTS Exchange nailing lead to fracture union in 84.785% of patients compared to the 66.412% of dynamization with statistically comparable durations until union (5.193 ± 2.310 mo and 4.769 ± 1.986 mo respectively). Dynamically locking exchange nails resulted in an average union time of 5.208 ± 2.475 mo compared to 5.149 ± 2.366 mo (P = 0.8682) in statically locked exchange nails. The overall union rate of the two procedures, statically and dynamically locked exchange nailing yielded union rates of 84.259% and 82.381% respectively. Therefore, there was no significant difference between the different locking methods of exchange nailing for union rate or time to union at a significance value of P < 0.05. The analysis showed exchange nailing to be the more successful choice in the treatment of femoral non-unions in respect to its higher success rate (491/567 EN, 24/57 dynam, P < 0.0001). However, there was no significant difference between the success rates of the two procedures for delayed union fractures (25/27 EN, 45/55 dynam, P = 0.3299). Nevertheless, dynamization was more efficient in the treatment of delayed unions (at rates comparable to exchange nailing) than in the treatment of non-unions. CONCLUSION In conclusion, after examination of factors, dynamization is recommended treatment of delayed femur fractures, while exchange nailing is the treatment of choice for non-unions.

Peritalar fracture dislocations typically involve the talar neck and are classified according to Hawkins. To our knowledge, peritalar fracture dislocation involving the talar body has not been formally reported. In this article, we describe a case of peritalar fracture dislocation of the talar body. Keywords: Peritalar dislocation, Talus fracture, Talar body fracture dislocation, Medial subtalar dislocation

The aim of our study was to compare the cost of preoperative empiric mupirocin treatment of all total joint arthroplasty patients with a standard Staphylococcus aureus screening and decolonization protocol. The cost of empiric mupirocin treatment is $24.65 per patient, whereas the cost of a standard S. aureus screening and decolonization protocol is $60.32 per patient. Given that more than 1,051,000 total joint arthroplasties are performed annually, the cost savings with empiric treatment is nearly $40 million per year. Empiric treatment allows for more efficient workflow, minimizes potential for clerical error, eliminates risk of undertreatment, and has not been shown to increase antibiotic resistance.

As the overall incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures continues to rise, the failure rates in reconstructive surgery remain relatively stable. Despite advances in our understanding of graft selection, anatomic reconstruction, addressing concomitant injuries, and the importance of rehabilitation, we continue to see failure rates in primary ACL reconstructions of up to 15%. Thus as the number of primary ACL reconstructions rises, so too does the number of revision ACL surgeries. This rising need for revision ACL reconstructions presents an even more daunting task because failure rates of up to 25% have been reported. Much of the current literature's focus is on improving outcomes and lowering these failure rates. Could adding a lateral extra-articular tenodesis to revision ACL surgery be the magic bullet we have been searching for to lower our failure rates? We question whether it is that simple.

Background: Tibia stress fractures are microscopic fractures of the tibia that are often the result of repetitive microtrauma as commonly seen in military recruits and intense athletics. Tibia stress fractures are more commonly unilateral and are usually in the diaphyseal portion of the tibia. We describe a case of bilateral medial proximal tibia occult fractures along the epiphyseal scar following blunt trauma. Case description: A 41-year-old bipolar male presented to the clinic one-week following a pedestrian versus motor vehicle accident. He subsequently developed low back pain and bilateral knee pain. The diagnosis of bilateral proximal tibia fractures was made using repeat plain X-ray films two-weeks after initial presentation. Operative treatment with bilateral medial tibia internal fixation was elected and the patient was discharged full weight-bearing. Literature review: There have been two case reports which explored the treatment options for bilateral proximal tibia fractures. Neither case elected to treat with internal fixation. Clinical relevance: Because the incidence of bilateral tibia stress fractures is low and operative treatment with bilateral internal fixation has not been reported, our case examines the viability of operatively treating bilateral tibia stress fractures with internal fixation. Our case demonstrates the successful treatment of bilateral medial proximal tibia occult fractures with internal fixation.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT In the setting of revision spine surgery for pseudoarthrosis, a variable amount of pedicle bone loss may be present. This is a result of screw loosening and subsequent screw track widening. Often the bone quality may be poor secondary to aging, malnutrition, previous infection and smoking. In these difficult cases, multiple techniques have been utilized to enhance the construct strength. Current options for revision pedicle screw fixation include cement augmented screw fixation and custom-made large diameter screws. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to present the authors’ experience using fibular allograft in the setting of bone loss with loose pedicle screw revision. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective. PATIENT SAMPLE A total of 10 patients. OUTCOME MEASURES CT scan lumbar spine ODI. METHODS In patients with extensive screw track dilation, fibular allograft was obtained and cut into small, longitudinal strips—approximately 3 mm in thickness. The length of each fibular allograft strut was trimmed to coincide with the length of the former screw, allowing for overhang. Allograft strut was inserted into the screw track along the wall. The screw was then advanced between the allograft, and after full insertion of the screw, the fibular allografts were then trimmed. RESULTS This technique was successfully used in 10 consecutive patients during revision lumbar spine surgeries for pseudoarthrosis. All patients had loose pedicle screws with significant bone loss around the screw tracks. Excellent purchase was achieved in all patients. CT scan at the last follow up showed incorporation of the fibular allograft and sound fusion in all patients except one. CONCLUSIONS Fibular allograft is a viable option in the setting of revision pedicle screw fixation and has several advantages when compared to currently available methods. It avoids the complications associated with cement augmented pedicle screws. In addition, it can be used impromptu, when other options are not immediately available. This technique can be employed without specialized instrumentation at significant cost savings when compared to custom made screws. Finally, this technique allows for biologic fixation at the screw-bone interface. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

Noncompliance with postoperative follow-up visits remains a common problem in orthopaedic trauma. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for loss of follow-up after orthopaedic trauma.Retrospective review.Urban level 1 academic trauma center.A total of 307 (226 men/81 women) patients undergoing surgical treatment of their orthopaedic injuries were included in this study. The average age was 40.4 ± 17 years.All patients were treated surgically for their orthopaedic injuries and were instructed to follow-up in the orthopaedic trauma clinic after hospital discharge.Noncompliance with follow-up appointment at 6 months after injury.Over a 6-month postoperative period, a total of 215 patients were noncompliant with at least one of their follow-up appointments between hospital discharge and the 6-month follow-up. A logistic regression showed male gender, uninsured or government insurance, and smoker to be statistically significant risk factors for noncompliance with the 6-month follow-up (P0.05). Noncompliance with any follow-up appointment was significantly increased in patients with illicit drug abuse (P = 0.02) as per logistic regression analysis.Loss of follow-up is a common problem in orthopaedic trauma. Our study suggests different risk factors for noncompliance, including male gender, smoker, lack of commercial health insurance, and illicit drug abuse. Health care providers may consider establishing protocols for facilitating follow-up appointments to patients who are at risk for noncompliance.

Abscess of the iliopsoas muscle is a rare condition that requires a high degree of clinical suspicion for diagnosis. High mortality rates highlight the need for prompt recognition. We report the case of a 26-year-old man, with a history of intravenous drug use, who was referred from an outside facility with sacral fracture and gluteal abscess. Sacral trauma occurred 3 weeks before presentation, with progressive worsening of buttock pain. The patient was treated with irrigation and débridement of the gluteal abscess. Follow-up MRI revealed a communicating iliopsoas abscess that initially had been undiagnosed. After a prolonged hospital stay requiring additional irrigation and débridement procedures, the patient was discharged in a stable condition. Five-month follow-up has demonstrated no evidence of recurrence of infection. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of Staphylococcus aureus gluteal abscess with pelvic extension into the iliopsoas secondary to sacral trauma and intravenous drug use.