Search

OBJECTIVES Outcomes evaluation is enhanced by assignment of operative procedures to appropriate categories based upon relative average risk. Formal risk modelling is challenging when a large number of operation types exist, including relatively rare procedures. Complexity stratification provides an alternative methodology. We report the initial application in the Congenital Heart Surgery Databases of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (EACTS) of an empirically derived system of complexity adjustment to evaluate surgical case mix and results. METHODS Complexity stratification is a method of analysis in which the data are divided into relatively homogeneous groups (called strata). A complexity stratification tool named the STS–EACTS Congenital Heart Surgery Mortality Categories (STAT Mortality Categories) was previously developed based on the analysis of 77 294 operations entered in the Congenital Heart Surgery Databases of EACTS (33 360 operations) and STS (43 934 patients). Procedure-specific mortality rate estimates were calculated using a Bayesian model that adjusted for small denominators. Operations were sorted by increasing risk and grouped into five categories (the STAT Mortality Categories) that were designed to minimize within-category variation and maximize between-category variation. We report here the initial application of this methodology in the EACTS Congenital Heart Surgery Database (47 187 operations performed over 4 years: 2006–09) and the STS Congenital Heart Surgery Database (64 307 operations performed over 4 years: 2006–09). RESULTS In the STS Congenital Heart Surgery Database, operations classified as STAT Mortality Categories 1–5 were (1): 17332, (2): 20114, (3): 9494, (4): 14525 and (5): 2842. Discharge mortality was (1): 0.54%, (2): 1.6%, (3): 2.4%, (4): 7.5% and (5): 17.8%. In the EACTS Congenital Heart Surgery Database, operations classified as STAT Mortality Categories 1–5 were (1): 19874, (2): 12196, (3): 5614, (4): 8287 and (5): 1216. Discharge mortality was (1): 0.99%, (2): 2.9%, (3): 5.0%, (4): 10.3% and (5): 25.0%. CONCLUSIONS The STAT Mortality Categories facilitate analysis of outcomes across the wide spectrum of distinct congenital heart surgery operations including infrequently performed procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Objective: The analysis of the second harvest of the STS Congenital Heart Surgery Database produced meaningful outcome data and several critical lessons relevant to congenital heart surgery outcomes analysis worldwide. Methods: This data harvest represents the first STS multi-institutional experience with software utilizing the nomenclature and database requirements adopted by the STS and EACTS (April 2000 Annals of Thoracic Surgery). Members of the STS Congenital Heart Committee analyzed the STS data. Results: This STS harvest includes data from 16 centers (12787 cases, 2881 neonates, 4124 infants). In 2002, the EACTS reported similar outcome data utilizing the same database definitions (41 centers, 12736 cases, 2245 neonates, 4195 infants). Lessons from the analysis include: (1) Death must be clearly defined. (2) The Primary Procedure in a given operation must be documented. (3) Inclusionary and exclusionary criteria for all diagnoses and procedures must be agreed upon. (4) Missing data values remain an issue for the database. (5) Generic terms in the nomenclature lists, that is terms ending in Not Otherwise Specified (NOS), are redundant and decrease the clarity of data analysis. (6) Methodology needs to be developed and implemented to assure and verify data completeness and data accuracy. ‘Operative Mortality’ and ‘Mortality Assigned to this Operation’ were defined by the STS and EACTS; these definitions were not utilized uniformly. ‘Thirty Day Mortality’ was problematic because some centers did not track mortality after hospital discharge. Only ‘Mortality Prior to Discharge’ was consistently reported. Designation of Primary Procedure for a given operation determines its location for analysis. Until Complexity Scores lead to automated methodology for choosing the Primary Procedure, the surgeon must designate the Primary Procedure. Inclusionary and exclusionary criteria for all diagnoses and procedures have been developed in an effort to define acceptable concomitant diagnoses and procedures for each analysis. Improvements in data completeness can be achieved using a variety of techniques including developing more functional techniques of data entry at individual institutions and software improvements. Future versions of the STS Congenital Database will request that the coding of diagnoses and procedures avoid the terms ending in NOS. Conclusions: Lessons from this data harvest should improve congenital heart surgery outcome analysis. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

According to The International Society for Nomenclature of Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease (ISNPCHD), "Heterotaxy is synonymous with 'visceral heterotaxy' and 'heterotaxy syndrome'. Heterotaxy is defined as an abnormality where the internal thoraco-abdominal organs demonstrate abnormal arrangement across the left-right axis of the body. By convention, heterotaxy does not include patients with either the expected usual or normal arrangement of the internal organs along the left-right axis, also known as 'situs solitus', or patients with complete mirror-imaged arrangement of the internal organs along the left-right axis also known as `situs inversus'." or patients with complete mirror-image arrangement of the internal organs along the left-right axis, also known as situs inversus. The purpose of this article is to review the data about heterotaxy in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Congenital Heart Surgery Database. The investigators examined all index operations in the STS Congenital Heart Surgery Database over 12 years from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 2009, inclusive. This analysis resulted in a cohort of 77 153 total index operations. Of these, 1505 operations (1.95%) were performed in patients with heterotaxy. Of the 1505 index operations performed in patients with heterotaxy, 1144 were in patients with asplenia and 361 were in patients with polysplenia. In every STS -EACTS Congenital Heart Surgery Mortality Category, discharge mortality is higher in patients with heterotaxy compared with patients without heterotaxy (EACTS = European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery). Discharge mortality after systemic to pulmonary artery shunt is 6.6% in a cohort of all single-ventricle patients except those with heterotaxy, whereas it is 10.8% in single-ventricle patients with heterotaxy. Discharge mortality after Fontan is 1.8% in a cohort of all single-ventricle patients except those with heterotaxy, whereas it is 4.2% in single-ventricle patients with heterotaxy. The STS Congenital Heart Surgery Database is largest congenital heart surgery database in North America. This review of data from the STS Congenital Heart Surgery Database allows for unique documentation of practice patterns and outcomes. From this analysis, it is clear that heterotaxy is a challenging problem with increased discharge mortality in most subgroups.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Congenital Heart Surgery Database contains data about 3258 patients with the diagnosis of transposition of the great arteries (TGA) who underwent surgery during the 4-year time interval from July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2009, inclusive. This cohort includes 2918 patients with concordant atrioventricular connections and discordant ventriculoarterial connections and 341 patients with congenitally corrected TGA (discordant atrioventricular connections and discordant ventriculoarterial connections). The 4 most common operations were the following: (1) arterial switch operation (ASO) for TGA with intact ventricular septum (n = 1196), (2) ASO with ventricular septal defect (VSD) repair for TGA with VSD (n = 420), (3) ASO with VSD repair and aortic arch repair for TGA with VSD and hypoplastic arch (n = 55), and (4) Rastelli operation for TGA with VSD and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (n = 49). Detailed preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were obtained about patients who underwent these 4 operations. Median age at surgery (days) was as follows: ASO: 6.0; ASO with VSD repair: 7.0; ASO with VSD repair and aortic arch repair: 7.0; and Rastelli: 309.0. Mean age at surgery (days) was as follows: ASO: 22.9; ASO with VSD repair: 24.8; ASO with VSD repair and aortic arch repair: 14.4; and Rastelli: 721.8. Discharge mortality was as follows: ASO: 2.2%; ASO with VSD repair: 5.5%; ASO with VSD repair and aortic arch repair: 7.3%; and Rastelli: 0%. Median length of stay (days) was as follows: ASO: 11.0; ASO with VSD repair: 11.0; ASO with VSD repair and aortic arch repair: 18.0; and Rastelli: 7.0. The sternum was left open in the following: ASO: 24.8%; ASO with VSD repair: 29.5%; ASO with VSD repair and aortic arch repair: 40.0%; and Rastelli: 6.1%. This review of data from the STS Congenital Heart Surgery Database allows for unique documentation of patterns of practice and outcomes. From this review, we learned that although surgery for TGA is often complex and may be associated with morbidity, most patients survive without major complications.