Search

Purpose: The uncommon EGFR exon 19 deletion (ex19del), L747_A750>P, demonstrates reduced sensitivity to osimertinib compared with the common ex19del, E746_A750del in preclinical models. The clinical efficacy of osimertinib in patients with non–small cell lung cancer harboring L747_A750>P and other uncommon ex19dels is not known. Experimental Design: The AACR GENIE database was interrogated to characterize the frequency of individual ex19dels relative to other variants, and a multicenter retrospective cohort was used to compare clinical outcomes for patients with tumors harboring E746_A750del, L747_A750>P, and other uncommon ex19dels who received osimertinib in the first line (1L) or in second or later lines of therapy and were T790M+ (≥2L). Results: ex19dels comprised 45% of EGFR mutations, with 72 distinct variants ranging in frequency from 28.1% (E746_A750del) to 0.03%, with L747_A750>P representing 1.8% of the EGFR mutant cohort. In our multi-institutional cohort (N = 200), E746_A750del was associated with significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) with 1L osimertinib versus L747_A750>P [median 21.3 months (95% confidence interval, 17.0–31.7) vs. 11.7 months (10.8–29.4); adjusted HR 0.52 (0.28–0.98); P = 0.043]. Osimertinib efficacy in patients with other uncommon ex19dels varied on the basis of the specific mutation present. Conclusions: The ex19del L747_A750>P is associated with inferior PFS compared with the common E746_A750del mutation in patients treated with 1L osimertinib. Understanding differences in osimertinib efficacy among EGFR ex19del subtypes could alter management of these patients in the future.

Supplementary Figure S3. Progression Free Survival for patients with tumors harboring select exon 19 deletions treated with second or later line osimertinib (T790M+). The point estimate for median progression free survival associated with each mutation is listed to the right of the figure legend.

Purpose:The uncommon EGFR exon 19 deletion (ex19del), L747_A750>P, demonstrates reduced sensitivity to osimertinib compared with the common ex19del, E746_A750del in preclinical models. The clinical efficacy of osimertinib in patients with non–small cell lung cancer harboring L747_A750>P and other uncommon ex19dels is not known.Design:The AACR GENIE database was interrogated to characterize the frequency of individual ex19dels relative to other variants, and a multicenter retrospective cohort was used to compare clinical outcomes for patients with tumors harboring E746_A750del, L747_A750>P, and other uncommon ex19dels who received osimertinib in the first line (1L) or in second or later lines of therapy and were T790M+ (≥2L).Results:ex19dels comprised 45% of EGFR mutations, with 72 distinct variants ranging in frequency from 28.1% (E746_A750del) to 0.03%, with L747_A750>P representing 1.8% of the EGFR mutant cohort. In our multi-institutional cohort (N = 200), E746_A750del was associated with significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) with 1L osimertinib versus L747_A750>P [median 21.3 months (95% confidence interval, 17.0–31.7) vs. 11.7 months (10.8–29.4); adjusted HR 0.52 (0.28–0.98); P = 0.043]. Osimertinib efficacy in patients with other uncommon ex19dels varied on the basis of the specific mutation present.Conclusions:The ex19del L747_A750>P is associated with inferior PFS compared with the common E746_A750del mutation in patients treated with 1L osimertinib. Understanding differences in osimertinib efficacy among EGFR ex19del subtypes could alter management of these patients in the future.

Supplementary Table S1. Descriptive analysis of patient characteristics and outcomes for those with tumors harboring uncommon exon 19 deletions treated with osimertinib. Each variant represented ≤2.5% of the study cohort. Patients with + for “Smoking History” are those with either a prior or current smoking history. PFS=Progression free survival; OS= Overall survival; à denotes patients who have not yet experienced an event for a time to event endpoint.

Molecular modifiers of KRAS G12C inhibitor (KRAS G12Ci) efficacy in advanced KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC are poorly defined. In a large unbiased clinico-genomic analysis of 424 NSCLC patients, we identified and validated co-alterations in KEAP1, SMARCA4 and CDKN2A as major independent determinants of inferior clinical outcomes with KRAS G12Ci monotherapy. Collectively, co-mutations in these three tumor suppressor genes segregated patients into distinct prognostic subgroups and captured ~50% of those with early disease progression (PFS≤3 months) with KRAS G12Ci. Pathway-level integration of less prevalent co-alterations in functionally related genes nominated PI3K/AKT/MTOR pathway and additional baseline RAS gene alterations, including amplifications, as candidate drivers of inferior outcomes with KRAS G12Ci, and revealed a possible association between defective DNA damage response/repair and improved KRAS G12Ci efficacy. Our findings propose a framework for patient stratification and clinical outcome prediction in KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC that can inform rational selection and appropriate tailoring of emerging combination therapies.

IntroductionEGFR mutations drive a subset of NSCLC. Patients harboring the common EGFR mutations, deletion ofexon 19 and L858R, respond well to osimertinib, a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Nevertheless, the effect of osimertinib on NSCLC with atypical EGFR mutations is not well described. This multicenter retrospective study evaluates the efficacy of osimertinib among patients with NSCLC harboring atypical EGFR mutations.MethodsPatients with metastatic NSCLC treated with osimertinib, harboring at least one atypical EGFR mutation, excluding concurrent deletion of exon 19, L858R, or T790M mutations, from six U.S. academic cancer centers were included. Baseline clinical characteristics were collected. The primary end point was the time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) of osimertinib. Objective response rate by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 was also assessed.ResultsA total of 50 patients with NSCLC with uncommon EGFR mutations were identified. The most frequent EGFR mutations were L861Q (40%, n= 18), G719X (28%, n= 14), and exon 20 insertion (14%, n= 7). The median TTD of osimertinib was 9.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.5-12.9 mo) overall and 10.7 months (95% CI: 3.2-18.1 mo) in the first-line setting (n= 20). The objective response rate was 31.7% (95% CI: 18.1%-48.1%) overall and 41.2% (95% CI: 18.4%-67.1%) in the first-line setting. The median TTD varied among patients with L861Q (17.2 mo), G719X (7.8 mo), and exon 20 insertion (1.5 mo) mutations.ConclusionsOsimertinib has activity in patients with NSCLC harboring atypical EGFR mutations. Osimertinib activity differs by the type of atypical EGFR-activating mutation.

Introduction In classical EGFR mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy yields better outcomes than platinum-based chemotherapy. However, EGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) NSCLC is relatively resistant to currently available EGFR TKIs. Though platinum-based chemotherapy is the frontline standard of care for EGFR ex20ins NSCLC, its efficacy is not fully described. Study Design A retrospective, single-center, case series Methods Patients were identified through an electronic research database at a single institution and included if they had advanced EGFR ex20ins NSCLC, received platinum-based chemotherapy for metastatic disease, and had scans evaluable for response. Each patient's demographics, tumor characteristics, and clinical course were recorded. Treatment response was evaluated using RECIST v1.1 criteria, and the PFS was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Among 27 patients identified with EGFR ex20ins NSCLC at our institution, 18 (67%) received platinum-based chemotherapy for metastatic disease and had scans evaluable for response. These patients received platinum-based chemotherapy in the first-line (N = 17, 94%) and second-line settings (N = 1, 6%). The objective response rate (ORR) to platinum-based chemotherapy was 39% (7 of 18 patients; 95% confidence interval [CI] 16-61). The median PFS with platinum-based chemotherapy was 7.1 months (95% CI, 6.3 -13.7), and the median overall survival was 3.2 years (95% CI, 1.92 – NR). Conclusions The efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in EGFR ex20ins NSCLC is similar to that expected for TKI sensitive EGFR mutant NSCLC. Novel agents designed to specifically target ex20ins mutant EGFR should additionally improve outcomes.

Background Lung cancer survivors have a high risk of developing second primary lung cancer (SPLC), but little is known about the survival impact of SPLC diagnosis. Methods We analyzed data from 138 969 patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER), who were surgically treated for initial primary lung cancer (IPLC) in 1988-2013. Each patient was followed from the date of IPLC diagnosis to SPLC diagnosis (for those with SPLC) and last vital status through 2016. We performed multivariable Cox regression to evaluate the association between overall survival and SPLC diagnosis as a time-varying predictor. To investigate potential effect modification, we tested interaction between SPLC and IPLC stage. Using data from the Multiethnic Cohort Study (MEC) (n = 1540 IPLC patients with surgery), we evaluated the survival impact of SPLC by smoking status. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results A total of 12 115 (8.7%) patients developed SPLC in SEER over 700 421 person-years of follow-up. Compared with patients with single primary lung cancer, those with SPLC had statistically significantly reduced overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.06 to 2.17; P Conclusions SPLC diagnosis is statistically significantly associated with decreased survival in SEER and MEC. Intensive surveillance targeting patients with early stage IPLC and active smoking at IPLC diagnosis may lead to a larger survival benefit.

PURPOSE KRAS-mutated ( KRASMUT) non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is emerging as a heterogeneous disease defined by comutations, which may confer differential benefit to PD-(L)1 immunotherapy. In this study, we leveraged computational biological modeling (CBM) of tumor genomic data to identify PD-(L)1 immunotherapy sensitivity among KRASMUT NSCLC molecular subgroups. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this multicohort retrospective analysis, the genotype clustering frequency ranked method was used for molecular clustering of tumor genomic data from 776 patients with KRASMUT NSCLC. These genomic data were input into the CBM, in which customized protein networks were characterized for each tumor. The CBM evaluated sensitivity to PD-(L)1 immunotherapy using three metrics: programmed death-ligand 1 expression, dendritic cell infiltration index (nine chemokine markers), and immunosuppressive biomarker expression index (14 markers). RESULTS Genotype clustering identified eight molecular subgroups and the CBM characterized their shared cancer pathway characteristics: KRAS MUT/ TP53 MUT, KRAS MUT/ CDKN2A/ B/ C MUT, KRAS MUT/ STK11 MUT, KRAS MUT/ KEAP1 MUT, KRAS MUT/ STK11 MUT/ KEAP1 MUT, KRAS MUT/ PIK3CA MUT, KRAS MUT/ ATM MUT, and KRAS MUT without comutation. CBM identified PD-(L)1 immunotherapy sensitivity in the KRAS MUT/ TP53 MUT, KRAS MUT/ PIK3CA MUT, and KRAS MUT alone subgroups and resistance in the KEAP1 MUT containing subgroups. There was insufficient genomic information to elucidate PD-(L)1 immunotherapy sensitivity by the CBM in the KRAS MUT/ CDKN2A/ B/ C MUT, KRAS MUT/ STK11 MUT, and KRAS MUT/ ATM MUT subgroups. In an exploratory clinical cohort of 34 patients with advanced KRASMUT NSCLC treated with PD-(L)1 immunotherapy, the CBM-assessed overall survival correlated well with actual overall survival ( r = 0.80, P < .001). CONCLUSION CBM identified distinct PD-(L)1 immunotherapy sensitivity among molecular subgroups of KRASMUT NSCLC, in line with previous literature. These data provide proof-of-concept that computational modeling of tumor genomics could be used to expand on hypotheses from clinical observations of patients receiving PD-(L)1 immunotherapy and suggest mechanisms that underlie PD-(L)1 immunotherapy sensitivity.

Background In 2021, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) revised its lung cancer screening guidelines to expand screening eligibility. We evaluated screening sensitivities and racial and ethnic disparities under the 2021 USPSTF criteria vs alternative risk-based criteria in a racially and ethnically diverse population. Methods In the Multiethnic Cohort, we evaluated the proportion of ever-smoking lung cancer cases eligible for screening (ie, screening sensitivity) under the 2021 USPSTF criteria and under risk-based criteria through the PLCOm2012 model (6-year risk ≥1.51%). We also calculated the screening disparity (ie, absolute sensitivity difference) for each of 4 racial or ethnic groups (African American, Japanese American, Latino, Native Hawaiian) vs White cases. Results Among 5900 lung cancer cases, 43.3% were screen eligible under the 2021 USPSTF criteria. Screening sensitivities varied by race and ethnicity, with Native Hawaiian (56.7%) and White (49.6%) cases attaining the highest sensitivities and Latino (37.3%), African American (38.4%), and Japanese American (40.0%) cases attaining the lowest. Latino cases had the greatest screening disparity vs White cases at 12.4%, followed by African American (11.2%) and Japanese American (9.6%) cases. Under risk-based screening, the overall screening sensitivity increased to 75.7%, and all racial and ethnic groups had increased sensitivities (54.5%-91.9%). Whereas the screening disparity decreased to 5.1% for African American cases, it increased to 28.6% for Latino cases and 12.8% for Japanese American cases. Conclusions In the Multiethnic Cohort, racial and ethnic disparities decreased but persisted under the 2021 USPSTF lung cancer screening guidelines. Risk-based screening through PLCOm2012 may increase screening sensitivities and help to reduce disparities in some, but not all, racial and ethnic groups. Further optimization of risk-based screening strategies across diverse populations is needed.

OBJECTIVES: Lung cancer survivors have a high risk of developing a second primary lung cancer (SPLC). While national screening guidelines have been established for initial primary lung cancer (IPLC), no consensus guidelines exist for SPLC. Furthermore, the factors that contribute to SPLC risk have not been established. This study examines the potential for using serum metabolomics to identify metabolite biomarkers that differ between SPLC cases and IPLC controls. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this pilot case-control study, we applied an untargeted metabolomics approach based on ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy (UPLC-MS/MS) to serum samples of 82 SPLC cases and 82 frequency matched IPLC controls enrolled in the Boston Lung Cancer Study. Random forest and unconditional logistic regression models identified metabolites associated with SPLC. Candidate metabolites were integrated into a SPLC risk prediction model and the model performance was evaluated through a risk stratification approach. RESULTS: The untargeted analysis detected 1,008 named and 316 unnamed metabolites among all study participants. Metabolites that were significantly associated with SPLC (False Discovery Rate q-value < 0.2) included 5-methylthioadenosine (odds ratio [OR]=2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39–3.01; P=2.8×10(−4)) and phenylacetylglutamine (OR=2.65, 95% CI 1.56–4.51; P=3.2×10(−4)), each exhibiting approximately 1.5-fold increased levels among SPLC cases versus IPLC controls. In stratifying the study participants across quartiles of estimated SPLC risk, the risk prediction model identified a significantly higher proportion of SPLC cases in the fourth compared to the first quartile (68.3% versus 39.0%; P=0.044). CONCLUSION: SPLC cases may have distinct metabolomic profiles compared to those in IPLC patients without SPLC. A risk stratification approach integrating metabolomics may be useful for distinguishing patients based on SPLC risk. Prospective validation studies are needed to further evaluate the potential for leveraging metabolomics in SPLC surveillance and screening.

Introduction Despite the recent advance of consolidation durvalumab in the treatment of unresectable stage III NSCLC, not every patient benefits from durvalumab and the predictive markers of response have been difficult to identify. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC treated with consolidation durvalumab after definitive chemoradiation from January 2018 to March 2020. Results A total of 36 patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC were treated with consolidation durvalumab. Of these patients, 14 had tumor mutations in the ERBB family including 11 EGFR and 3 ERBB2. The ERBB2/EGFR tumor mutation cohort was more likely to be nonsmokers; otherwise, the two groups were similar in age, sex, programmed death-ligand 1 expression, and type of previous chemotherapy regimen. Patients in the ERBB2/EGFR cohort had a significantly shorter disease-free survival compared with the EGFR or ERBB2 wild-type cohort (7.5 mo versus not reached, p = 0.04). Conclusions Consolidation durvalumab seems to be less efficacious in patients with ERBB2/EGFR-mutant tumors. Future work should seek to evaluate this in the prospective setting and provide insight into the optimal treatment of ERBB2/EGFR-mutant stage III NSCLC.

Background: Irreversible allosteric KRAS p.G12C inhibitors (KG12Ci) such as sotorasib and adagrasib have revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of advanced KG12C-mutant NSCLC, however individual responses are heterogeneous and curtailed by innate and adaptive/acquired resistance. Molecular determinants of KG12Ci efficacy in NSCLC are poorly defined. We dissected the impact of major KG12C co-mutations and explored the effects of less prevalent co-alterations on the clinical activity of KG12Ci in the largest treated cohort to date of patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC. Key findings were validated in preclinical KG12C NSCLC models. Methods: Baseline clinico-genomic features and clinical outcome data from pts with stage IV KG12C NSCLC (ECOG PS 0-2) treated with single-agent KG12Ci were collected retrospectively from 20 centers in the US and Europe. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS and OS and differences were assessed with the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% CI were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model stratified for clinical co-variates. The impact of selected co-alterations on sotorasib efficacy was assessed in syngeneic (C57BL/6) KG12C NSCLC models. Results: 411 eligible pts were included in the study. Median age was 68 years, 77% of pts had received both platinum-based chemotherapy and PD-(L)1 inhibitors and 35% had brain metastases. 83% of pts received sotorasib. ORR with KG12Ci was 32.4% (95% CI, 27.9-37.1), PFS was 5.1m (95% CI, 4.5-5.6) and OS was 10.2m (95% CI, 8.4-12.1). Co-alterations in KEAP1, SMARCA4 and CDKN2A/B were each associated with significantly shorter PFS (KEAP1: 2.8m vs 5.5m, HR 2.50, P Conclusions: Co-mutations in KEAP1, SMARCA4 and CDKN2A/2B define subgroups of KG12C NSCLC pts with markedly distinct outcomes with KG12Ci monotherapy. Tailoring of KG12C inhibitor-anchored therapeutic strategies and patient stratification should take into account the co-mutation status of individual tumors. Citation Format: Marcelo V. Negrao, Haniel A. Araujo, Giuseppe Lamberti, Alissa J. Cooper, Teng Zhou, Neal Akhave, Lukas Delasos, J Kevin Hicks, Mihaela Aldea, Gabriele Minuti, Jacobi Hines, Jacqueline V. Aredo, Michael J. Dennis, Turja Chakrabarti, Susan Scott, Paolo Bironzo, Matthias Scheffler, Petros Christopoulos, So Yeon Kim, Sarah Goldberg, Ying Ni, Blerina Resuli, Lorenza Landi, Shu-Chi Tseng, Mizuki Nishino, Dwight Owen, Collin Blakely, Giannis Mountzios, Catherine A. Shu, Christine Bestvina, Marina Garassino, Kristen Marrone, Jhanelle Gray, Sandip Pravin Patel, Amy L. Cummings, Heather A. Wakelee, Jurgen Wolf, Giorgio V. Scagliotti, Federico Cappuzzo, Fabrice Barlesi, Pradnya Patil, Don L. Gibbons, Funda Meric-Bernstam, J Jack Lee, John V. Heymach, David S. Hong, Rebecca S. Heist, Mark M. Awad, Ferdinandos Skoulidis. Molecular determinants of KRAS p.G12C inhibitor efficacy in advanced NSCLC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3431.

Background Chronic pelvic pain persists in some women with endometriosis even after lesion removal and optimized hormonal treatment. Objective Characterize the presence and distribution of pain, myofascial dysfunction and sensitisation beyond the pelvis in women with endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain. Methods Cross-sectional study of 30 women prior to participation in a clinical trial. Evaluation included pain-focused abdominopelvic gynaecologic examination with the identification of pelvic floor muscle spasm. Neuro-musculoskeletal examination assessed paraspinal allodynia and hyperalgesia bilaterally and myofascial trigger points in 13 paired muscles. Pressure-pain thresholds were measured over interspinous ligaments and trigger points. Women completed the body territories element of the Body Pain Index. Results All women had a pelvic floor muscle spasm that they self-identified as a major focus of pain. Twenty of 30 women described their pelvic pain as focal. However, all demonstrated widespread myofascial dysfunction with low pressure-pain thresholds and trigger points in over two-thirds of 26 assessed regions. Widespread spinal segmental sensitisation was present in 17/30, thoracic in 21/30 and lumbosacral/pelvic in 18/30. Cervical sensitisation manifested as low pressure-pain thresholds with 23/30 also reporting recurrent, severe headaches and 21/30 experiencing orofacial pain. Those reporting diffuse pelvic pain were more likely to have widespread (p = .024) and lumbosacral/pelvic (p = .036) sensitisation and report over 10 painful body areas (p = .009). Conclusions Women with endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain often have myofascial dysfunction and sensitisation beyond the pelvic region that may be initiated or maintained by on-going pelvic floor spasm. These myofascial and nervous system manifestations warrant consideration when managing pain in this population. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01553201. Significance Women with endometriosis often have pelvic pain persisting after surgery despite hormonal therapies and these women have regional pelvic sensitisation and myofascial dysfunction. Pelvic floor muscle spasm is a major pain focus in this population. Sensitisation and myofascial dysfunction are widespread, beyond the pelvic region. On-going pelvic floor spasm may initiate or maintain sensitisation. Myofascial/sensitisation manifestations warrant consideration when managing pain in this population.

In this multicohort retrospective analysis, the genotype clustering frequency ranked method was used for molecular clustering of tumor genomic data from 776 patients withGenotype clustering identified eight molecular subgroups and the CBM characterized their shared cancer pathway characteristics:CBM identified distinct PD-(L)1 immunotherapy sensitivity among molecular subgroups of

Introduction: After the development of acquired resistance to osimertinib, the standard-of-care treatment for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC is chemotherapy. Whether afatinib, a pan-ErbB family tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is active after progression on osimertinib is unknown. Methods: We conducted a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who received afatinib-containing therapy after progression on osimertinib. Kaplan-Meier analyses evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from initiation of afatinib. Results: After progression on first (N=3) or second-line plus (N=12) osimertinib, 15 patients received afatinib monotherapy (N=3), afatinib and cetuximab (N=10), or afatinib and bevacizumab (N=2). The objective response rate was 6.7% and disease control rate was 53.3%. Median PFS was 2.5 months and median OS was 7.7 months. Median PFS of ≥ 6 months versus < 6 months on osimertinib was associated with a significantly greater median PFS on afatinib (4.0 versus 1.4 months; P=0.003), although there was no significant difference in median OS (9.3 versus 6.6 months; P=0.123). Best response of stable disease/partial response versus progressive disease on osimertinib was associated with a significantly greater median PFS on afatinib (3.4 versus 1.6 months; P=0.036) and a significantly greater median OS (8.7 versus 4.6 months; P=0.017). Conclusion: Afatinib-containing therapy had limited activity in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC after progression on osimertinib in this cohort of mostly second-line plus osimertinib. Response and longer PFS to prior osimertinib may be predictive of response to afatinib. Strategies based on osimertinib resistance mechanisms may further define the role of subsequent afatinib.

BACKGROUND: Few prognostic markers are available for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing neurosurgical resection of symptomatic brain metastases. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether tumor mutation status (EGFR, KRAS, ALK, ROS1, and BRAF) and treatment history were associated with survival after neurosurgery. METHODS: We reviewed the electronic health records of 104 patients with NSCLC with genomic profiling who underwent neurosurgical resection for symptomatic brain metastases at an academic institution between January 2000 and January 2018. We used multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models to evaluate the association between overall survival (OS) after neurosurgery and clinicopathologic factors, including mutation status. RESULTS: Mean age of patients in this study was 61 (±12) years, and 44% were men. The median OS after neurosurgery was 24 months (95% confidence interval, 18–34 months). Our multivariate analysis showed that the presence of an EGFR mutation in the tumor was significantly associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.214; P = 0.029), independent of tyrosine kinase inhibitor use. Presence of KRAS, ALK, ROS1, and BRAF alterations was not associated with survival (all P > 0.05). Conversely, older age (HR, 1.039; P = 0.029), a history of multiple brain irradiation procedures (HR, 9.197; P < 0.001), and presence of extracranial metastasis (HR, 2.556; P = 0.016) resulted in increased risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients requiring surgical resection of an epidermal growth factor receptor–mutated NSCLC brain metastasis had an associated improved survival compared with patients without this mutation, independent of tyrosine kinase inhibitor use. Decreased survival was associated with older age, multiple previous brain radiation therapies, and extracranial metastasis.

e21112 Background: EGFR exon 19 deletions (del19) are largely considered to have uniform sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Approximately 70% of del19 tumors harbor the most common deletion, E756_A750del; however, many “uncommon” variants comprise the remainder of this group. In preclinical studies, the uncommon del19, L747_A750 > P, demonstrates diminished sensitivity to the third generation TKI, osimertinib [. Identifying differences in clinical outcomes with osimertinib treatment could have therapeutic implications for patients (pts) with EGFR del19 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We conducted a multi-center retrospective cohort study of pts with metastatic EGFR del19 NSCLC treated with osimertinib. We compared progression free survival (PFS, time from TKI initiation to clinically significant growth of existing lesions or new lesions on imaging or death) and overall survival (OS) of pts with tumors harboring E746_A750del and L747_A750 > P who received osimertinib in the first line (1L) or in second or later lines of therapy and were T790M+ (≥2L). The Kaplan Meier method and Cox model were used to estimate PFS and OS, and multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of achieving PFS > 12 months. Multivariable analyses adjusted for baseline covariates- age, sex, race, and smoking. Results: From March 2013 to December 2021, 86 pts with EGFR E746_A750del and 36 with L747_A750 > P were treated with osimertinib. For 1L osimertinib, E746_A750del was associated with significantly prolonged PFS vs. L747_A750 > P (median 21.3 months (95% CI 17.0-31.7) vs. 11.7 months (10.8-29.4)) in the adjusted analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.52 [95% CI, 0.28-0.98, p = 0.043]). Pts with the common del19 mutation were more likely to achieve PFS > 12 months with 1L osimertinib than those with the L747_A750 > P mutation (Odds Ratio 4.14 (1.41-12.15), p 0.0097). OS exhibited a similar trend with a median OS that that was not reached (NR) at 40 months of follow-up among those with E746_A750del vs 26 months for L747_A750 > P (adjusted HR 0.52 [95% CI, 0.23-1.19], p = 0.120). For pts treated with ≥2L osimertinib, there was also a trend towards favorable PFS and OS for pts with tumors harboring E746_A750del. Conclusions: The del19 mutation L747_A750 > P is associated with inferior PFS compared to the common E746_A750del mutation in pts treated with 1L osimertinib. Understanding differences in osimertinib efficacy among EGFR del19 subtypes could alter management of these pts in the future.[Table: see text]

Background With advancing therapeutics, lung cancer (LC) survivors are rapidly increasing in number. Although mounting evidence suggests LC survivors have high risk of second primary lung cancer (SPLC), there is no validated prediction model available for clinical use to identify high-risk LC survivors for SPLC. Methods Using data from 6325 ever-smokers in the Multiethnic Cohort (MEC) study diagnosed with initial primary lung cancer (IPLC) in 1993-2017, we developed a prediction model for 10-year SPLC risk after IPLC diagnosis using cause-specific Cox regression. We evaluated the model’s clinical utility using decision curve analysis and externally validated it using 2 population-based data—Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) and National Lung Screening Trial (NLST)—that included 2963 and 2844 IPLC (101 and 93 SPLC cases), respectively. Results Over 14 063 person-years, 145 (2.3%) ever-smoking IPLC patients developed SPLC in MEC. Our prediction model demonstrated a high predictive accuracy (Brier score = 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.4 to 3.3) and discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristics [AUC] = 81.9%, 95% CI = 78.2% to 85.5%) based on bootstrap validation in MEC. Stratification by the estimated risk quartiles showed that the observed SPLC incidence was statistically significantly higher in the 4th vs 1st quartile (9.5% vs 0.2%; P Conclusions We developed and validated a SPLC prediction model based on large population-based cohorts. The proposed prediction model can help identify high-risk LC patients for SPLC and can be incorporated into clinical decision making for SPLC surveillance and screening.

Introduction In 2018, durvalumab was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as consolidation immunotherapy for patients with stage III NSCLC after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). However, whether durvalumab benefits patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC remains unknown. Methods We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of patients with unresectable stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC who completed concurrent CRT. Kaplan-Meier analyses evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) between patients who completed CRT with or without durvalumab. Results Among 37 patients, 13 initiated durvalumab a median of 20 days after CRT completion. Two patients completed 12 months of treatment, with five patients discontinuing durvalumab owing to progression and five owing to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Of 24 patients who completed CRT without durvalumab, 16 completed CRT alone and eight completed CRT with induction or consolidation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Median PFS was 10.3 months in patients who received CRT and durvalumab versus 6.9 months with CRT alone (log-rank p = 0.993). CRT and EGFR TKI was associated with a significantly longer median PFS (26.1 mo) compared with CRT and durvalumab or CRT alone (log-rank p = 0.023). Six patients treated with durvalumab initiated EGFR TKIs after recurrence, with one developing grade 4 pneumonitis on osimertinib. Conclusions In this study, patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC did not benefit with consolidation durvalumab and experienced a high frequency of irAEs. Patients who initiate osimertinib after durvalumab may be susceptible to incident irAEs. Consolidation durvalumab should be approached with caution in this setting and concurrent CRT with induction or consolidation EGFR TKIs further investigated as definitive treatment.

Introduction: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the U.S. Despite recent survival improvements, racial and socioeconomic disparities still exist in lung cancer incidence and survival. Furthermore, recent studies showed that lung cancer survivors have a high risk of developing second primary lung cancer (SPLC). While racial and socioeconomic disparities have long been examined for lung cancer survival and incidence, little is known about their impacts on SPLC risk among lung cancer survivors. This study evaluated the disparities in SPLC incidence by calculating the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of the observed SPLC incidence versus the expected incidence of initial primary lung cancer (IPLC) across different socioeconomic, acculturation, and smoking-related factors using county-level data obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER). Methods: We identified 158,018 patients diagnosed with IPLC between 2000 and 2013 in SEER. SPLC was defined as a newly developed primary lung cancer after 2 years from IPLC diagnosis and was followed through 2018. The SIR was calculated as the ratio of the observed SPLC incidence versus the expected incidence of IPLC in the general population across different factors. Indicators of socioeconomic status, acculturation factors, and smoking prevalence in SEER were derived from county-level data using the American Community Survey and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). The quintiles of these indicators were created using the data obtained across all 3,142 valid U.S. counties. We applied the Pearson's chi-squared test to evaluate the difference in SIRs across quintiles of the indicators we created, applying a statistical significance of α < 0.005 after adjusting for multiple testing. Results: Among 158,018 IPLC patients, 10,650 (6.7%) developed SPLC over 626,853 person-years. The incidence of SPLC was 6 times higher than the IPLC incidence in the general population, with an overall SIR of 6.2 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 6.09-6.32). Notably, the SIR, i.e., the ratio between the SPLC incidence and the IPLC incidence, was significantly higher among individuals who live in counties with the lowest quintile of median family income ($74,331) (SIR 7.18 versus 6.10, P29.6%) versus SIR of 5.77 (CI: 5.63-5.91) with the lowest quintile of smoking prevalence ( Citation Format: Eunji Choi, Sophia J. Luo, Jacqueline V. Aredo, Joel W. Neal, Leah M. Backhus, Heather A. Wakelee, Summer S. Han. Disparities in risk of second primary lung cancer among lung cancer patients in the United States [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Conference: 14th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2021 Oct 6-8. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-130.

Concurrent genetic mutations are prevalent in KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and may differentially influence patient outcomes. We sought to characterize the effects of KRAS mutation subtypes and concurrent pathogenic mutations on overall survival (OS) and PD-L1 expression, a predictive biomarker for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy.We retrospectively identified patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC at a single institution and abstracted clinical, molecular, and pathologic data from electronic health records. Cox regression and multinomial logistic regression were used to determine how KRAS mutation subtypes and concurrent pathogenic mutations are associated with OS and tumor PD-L1 expression, respectively.A total 186 patients were included. Common KRAS mutation subtypes included G12C (35%) and G12D (17%). Concurrent pathogenic mutations were identified in TP53 (39%), STK11 (12%), KEAP1 (8%), and PIK3CA (4%). On multivariable analysis, KRAS G12D mutations were significantly associated with poor OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-5.16; P = 0.021), as were STK11 co-mutations (HR 2.95, 95% CI 1.27-6.88; P = 0.012). Compared to no (1%) PD-L1 expression, KRAS G12C mutations were significantly associated with positive yet low (1-49%) PD-L1 expression (odds ratio [OR] 4.94, 95% CI 1.07-22.85; P = 0.041), and TP53 co-mutations with high (≥50%) PD-L1 expression (OR 6.36, 95% CI 1.84-22.02; P = 0.004).KRAS G12D and STK11 mutations confer poor prognoses for patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC. KRAS G12C and TP53 mutations correlate with a biomarker that predicts benefit from immunotherapy. Concurrent mutations may represent distinct subsets of KRAS-mutant NSCLC; further investigation is warranted to elucidate their role in guiding treatment.

Background: Lung cancer (LC) survivors in the U.S. are increasing in number, with 5-year survival rates improving by 26% over the past decade. Although LC survivors are at high risk of developing a second primary lung cancer (SPLC), risk factors for SPLC have not been established and the impact of tobacco smoking remains controversial. In this study, we examined risk factors for SPLC among participants in the Multiethnic Cohort (MEC) study, validated our findings with two epidemiologic cohorts–the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) and the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)–and evaluated the impact of smoking cessation on SPLC risk. Methods: We analyzed data from 7,299 initial primary lung cancer (IPLC) cases in MEC who were diagnosed from 1993-2017. Incident IPLC and SPLC were identified via linkage to SEER registries, with SPLC defined by Martini and Melamed criteria. Baseline smoking data were obtained at the time of enrollment (1993-1996) and updated with 10-year follow-up data close to IPLC diagnosis, if available. Fine-Gray regression was used to take into account competing risks and to evaluate the associations between risk factors and SPLC, adjusting for age at IPLC diagnosis and IPLC histology and stage. We conducted validation studies with PLCO (N=3,423 LC patients) and EPIC (N=4,605 LC patients) and evaluated the combined effects of risk factors from all three cohorts using meta-analysis. Results: Among 7,299 MEC participants with IPLC, 167 (2.3%) developed a SPLC. Fine-Gray regression analyses identified several factors that were significantly associated with SPLC risk (P Conclusions: Smoking is a risk factor for SPLC among LC patients and the USPSTF criteria can potentially aid in identifying those at high risk of SPLC. Smoking cessation may reduce SPLC risk after IPLC diagnosis. Further analysis is required to stratify SPLC risk based on comprehensive risk factors and identify LC survivors at high risk of SPLC for CT screening. Citation Format: Jacqueline V. Aredo, Sophia J. Luo, Rebecca Gardner, Thomas P. Hickey, Thomas L. Riley, Lynne R. Wilkens, Loic Le Marchand, Christopher I. Amos, Rayjean J. Hung, Mattias Johansson, Iona Cheng, Heather A. Wakelee, Summer S. Han. Is smoking a risk factor for second primary lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 2298.

9586 Background: High-dose osimertinib 160 mg QD (osi160) has activity in osi-naïve, EGFR+ NSCLC pts with CNS or leptomeningeal disease (LMD) per the BLOOM trial, but the role of dose-escalation for CNS progression (PD) and/or LMD that develops while on 80 mg QD (osi80) is unclear. We describe here our multi-institutional experience with osi160. Methods: 105 pts from 8 institutions with advanced EGFR+ NSCLC treated with osi160 were retrospectively reviewed. To assess the CNS efficacy of dose escalation for CNS PD, we focused on pts who escalated from osi80 to osi160 for CNS PD without the addition of chemo and/or RT during dose escalation (cohort A, 24 pts). We also examined osi escalation for CNS PD while receiving chemo and/or RT (cohort B, 34 pts) and those who started on osi160 for CNS PD as the initial osi dose without overlapping therapies (cohort C, 11 pts). Radiographic responses were clinically assessed via chart review of scan reports. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for time-to-event endpoints. We defined median duration of CNS disease control (MedDurCNSCon) on osi160 as time from the start of osi160 to CNS PD or discontinuation of osi160. Results: Among the 105 pts, 69 (26M, 43F; median age 57) EGFR+ NSCLC pts (29 del19, 31 L858R, 9 other) received osi160 for CNS PD between 10/2013 and 1/2020. Median lines of therapy pre-osi was 1 (range 0-8). While all 69 pts had CNS PD at the start of osi160, 61 (90%) had isolated CNS/LMD PD, without systemic PD. In cohort A, osi160 monotherapy had a MedDurCNSCon of 3.8 mos (95% CI, 1.7 – 5.8). Cohort A pts with isolated LMD (11) had MedDurCNSCon 5.8 mos (95% CI, 1.7 – 9) while those with parenchymal mets only (11) had MedDurCNSCon of 2 mos (95% CI, 1 - 4.9). In cohort B, osi160 in combination with RT (22) and/or chemo (14), had a MedDurCNSCon of 5.1 mos (95% CI, 3.1 – 6.5). In cohort C, osi160 monotherapy had a MedDurCNSCon of 4.2 mos (95% CI, 1.6 – NA). Pts on osi160 had no severe or life-threatening side effects. Conclusions: In this real-world cohort of EGFR+ NSCLC pts with CNS and/or LMD PD on osi80, dose escalation to 160 provided modest benefit with median 3.8 mos added CNS disease control. Dose escalation appeared more effective in pts with LMD versus parenchymal disease (MedDurCNSCon of 5.8 vs 2 mos). Treatment intensification with osi escalation plus RT and/or chemo appeared to confer about 1 month additional CNS disease control (power for comparison limited). Osi naïve pts started at 160 for CNS PD derived similar benefit. While limited by small numbers and retrospective design, this study suggests we need improved strategies to optimally manage CNS PD arising on osi80.

9570 Background: Osimertinib (osi) is a 3rd generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved for first line (1L) treatment of metastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR Exon 19 del and L858R (representing > 80% of EGFR activating mutations) or in NSCLC with EGFRT790M (the most common resistance mutation to 1st or 2nd generation TKI). However, it has not been well-studied in EGFR-mutant NSCLC harboring less common EGFR activating mutations such as G719X, L861Q, S768I, and exon 20 insertion (ins), among others. Methods: We conducted a multi-institution, retrospective study approved on institutional IRB protocols in a series of patients (pts.) with metastatic NSCLC treated with osi who harbored at least one atypical EGFR mutation, excluding those with concurrent L858R, Exon 19 del, or T790M. Kaplan-Meier analyses were generated with SPSS, v25 (IBM Corp., USA). Response was assessed by RECIST 1.1 in evaluable pts. Time on osi was employed as a surrogate endpoint for clinical benefit in this retrospective analysis. Results: Fifty-one NSCLC pts with uncommon EGFR mutations were identified among six US institutions. Pt characteristics: 72.5% women, median age 65 yo (44-83 yo), 82.3% ECOG PS 0-1, 43.1% never smoker, 100% lung adenocarcinoma, 58.8% Caucasian, 25.5% Asian, 3.9% Black, 2.0% Hispanic, and 9.8% Other. The most frequent mutations were L861Q (35.3%, N = 18), G719X (27.5%, N = 14), and Exon 20 ins (15.7%, N = 8). Osi was used in the 1L setting in 39.2% (N = 20). Median time on osi was 7.1 months (mo.) in the overall cohort (95% CI, 5.4 to 8.8 mo.) and 8.9 mo. (95% CI, 7.0 to 10.8 mo.) in pts receiving 1L osi. Patients harboring G719X (N = 4) and L861Q (N = 10) mutations had a median time on 1L osimertinib of 5.8 mo. and 19.3 mo., respectively. One patient’s tumor had an EGFR exon 19 ins and was on 1L osi with a partial response for 16.8 months. Two patients with Exon 20 ins were on 1L osi for 9.3 mo. and 8 mo., respectively. Conclusions: In this largest known clinically annotated dataset of patients with atypical EGFR-mutations treated with osi, activity was noted, though 1L clinical benefit on osi appears lower in this multicenter US cohort than in E19del or L858R. These results are comparable to the recently published prospective phase II trial ( Cho et al, 2019) conducted in Korea. Patients with L861Q and Exon 19 insertion appeared to benefit the most from osi in this time on treatment retrospective analysis. More detailed analysis of this cohort is planned and further prospective studies are warranted to determine clinical benefit of osi amongst diverse atypical EGFR-mutations.

The discovery of genomic alterations that drive the development and progression of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has transformed how we treat metastatic disease. However, the promise of precision medicine remains elusive for the most commonly mutated oncogene in NSCLC, KRAS. This is perhaps due to the substantial heterogeneity within the broader genomic context of KRAS-mutant NSCLC. At this time, approaches for treating metastatic KRAS-mutant NSCLC mirror those for treating NSCLC that lacks a known driver mutation, including standard chemotherapeutic and immunotherapeutic approaches. Ongoing research aims to define further subgroups of KRAS-mutant NSCLC based on mutation subtype and co-occurring mutations. These efforts offer the potential to optimize standard-of-care regimens within these emerging subgroups and harness innovative strategies to realize precision medicine in this setting.

The intent of this paper is to discuss the evolving role of the myofascial trigger point (MTrP) in myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) from both a historical and scientific perspective. MTrPs are hard, discrete, palpable nodules in a taut band of skeletal muscle that may be spontaneously painful (i.e. active), or painful only on compression (i.e. latent). MPS is a term used to describe a pain condition which can be acute or, more commonly, chronic and involves the muscle and its surrounding connective tissue (e.g. fascia). According to Travell and Simons, MTrPs are central to the syndrome—but are they necessary? Although the clinical study of muscle pain and MTrPs has proliferated over the past two centuries, the scientific literature often seems disjointed and confusing. Unfortunately, much of the terminology, theories, concepts, and diagnostic criteria are inconsistent, incomplete, or controversial. In order to address these deficiencies, investigators have recently applied clinical, imaging (of skeletal muscle and brain), and biochemical analyses to systematically and objectively study the MTrP and its role in MPS. Data suggest that the soft tissue milieu around the MTrP, neurogenic inflammation, sensitization, and limbic system dysfunction may all play a role in the initiation, amplification, and perpetuation of MPS. The authors will chronicle the advances that have led to the current understanding of MTrP pathophysiology and its relationship to MPS, and review the contributions of clinicians and researchers who have influenced and expanded our contemporary level of clinical knowledge and practice.

Chronic pelvic pain is a frustrating symptom for patients with endometriosis and is frequently refractory to hormonal and surgical management. While these therapies target ectopic endometrial lesions, they do not directly address pain due to central sensitization of the nervous system and myofascial dysfunction, which can continue to generate pain from myofascial trigger points even after traditional treatments are optimized. This article provides a background for understanding how endometriosis facilitates remodeling of neural networks, contributing to sensitization and generation of myofascial trigger points. A framework for evaluating such sensitization and myofascial trigger points in a clinical setting is presented. Treatments that specifically address myofascial pain secondary to spontaneously painful myofascial trigger points and their putative mechanisms of action are also reviewed, including physical therapy, dry needling, anesthetic injections, and botulinum toxin injections.

e21023Background: KRAS mutations occur in ~25% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and concurrent genomic alterations may contribute to differences in patient survival. Therefore, ...