Search

The SynCardia total artificial heart (TAH-t) is an effective bridge to transplantation for patients with severe biventricular failure. However, granular single-center data from high volume centers are lacking. We report our experience with the first 100 TAH-t recipients.A prospective institutional database was used to identify 100 patients who underwent 101 TAH-t implantations between 2012 and 2022. Patients were stratified and compared according to Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) profile 1 versus2. Median follow-up on device support was 94 days (IQR: 33-276 days), while median post-transplantation follow-up was 4.6 years (IQR: 2.1-6.0 years).Overall, 61 patients (61%) were successfully bridged to transplantation while 39 (39%) died on TAH-t support. Successful bridge rates between INTERMACS profile 1 and INTERMACS profile2 patients were similar (55.6%, 95% CI 40.4-68.3% versus 67.4%, 95% CI 50.5-79.6%, respectively, p=0.50). The most common adverse events (rates per 100 patient-months) on TAH-t support included infection (15.8), ischemic stroke (4.6), reoperation for mediastinal bleeding (3.5), and gastrointestinal bleeding requiring intervention (4.3). The most common cause of death on TAH-t support was multisystem organ failure (n=20, 52.6%). Post-transplantation thirty-day survival was 96.7%, while survival at 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years post-transplantation were 95.1% (95% CI 85.4-98.4%), 86.6% (95% CI 74.9-93.0%), and 77.5% (95% CI 64.2-86.3%), respectively.Acceptable outcomes can be achieved in the highest acuity patients utilizing the TAH-t as a bridge to heart transplantation.

Background Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) remains a public health crisis. The epidemiology of COVID-19-associated large- and medium-sized-vessel pathology is not well characterized. The aim of this study is to identify patients with possible COVID-19-associated large- and medium-sized-vessel pathology based on computed tomography (CT) imaging to provide insight into this rare, but potentially devastating, cardiovascular manifestation. Methods This is a single-center retrospective review of patients with CT chest, abdomen, and/or pelvis concerning for large- and medium-vessel pathology and confirmed COVID-19 infection from March 1, 2020 to October 31, 2020. Results During the study period, 6,553 CT reports were reviewed and pertinent imaging was identified in 139 patients. Of these, 8 patients (median age: 59 years, range 51–82) were COVID-19 positive. All patients had preexisting cardiovascular risk factors and three (37.5%) had an autoimmune disease. Four patients were never hospitalized for COVID-19. Among these, two presented to the hospital at a median of 39 days (range: 27–50) after their initial COVID-19 test with chest and back pain where imaging revealed extensive aortic pathology. One patient required surgical management for aortic pathology. All other patients were treated with expectant management and outpatient follow-up. Conclusion The clinical and radiological presentations of COVID-19-associated large- and medium-vessel pathology are heterogeneous and can be a late finding after COVID-19 recovery. Close clinical follow-up and surveillance imaging for large- and medium-sized-vessel pathology may be warranted in COVID-19 patients.

Risk-adjusted survival after late heart re-transplantation may be comparable to primary transplant, but the efficacy of re-transplantation in older candidates is not established. We evaluated outcomes after heart re-transplantation in recipients60 years.We identified 1026 adult patients undergoing isolated heart re-transplantation between 2003 and 2020 from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Older recipients (60 years, n=177) were compared to younger recipients (≤ 60 years, n=849). Five and ten-year post-transplant survival was estimated using the Kalpan-Meier method and adjusted with multivariable Cox models.Older recipients were more likely to be male and have diabetes or previous malignancies with higher baseline creatinine. They also more frequently required pre-transplant ECMO (11.9% vs. 6.8%, p=0.02) and received re-transplantation due to primary graft failure (13.6% vs. 8.5%, p=0.03). After the transplant, older recipients had a higher incidence of stroke (6.8% vs. 2.6%, p=0.01) and dialysis requirements (20.3% vs. 13.2%) before discharge (both p0.05), and more frequently died from malignancy-related causes (16.3% vs. 3.9%, p0.001). After adjustment, recipient age60 was associated with an increased risk of both 5-year (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.02-2.01, p=0.04) and 10-year mortality (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.20-2.45, p=0.003). Restricted cubic spline showed a non-linear relationship between recipient age and 10-year mortality.Heart re-transplantation in recipients60 years has inferior outcomes compared to younger recipients. Strict patient selection and close follow-up are warranted to ensure the appropriate utilization of donor hearts and to improve long-term outcomes.

Advanced age confers higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) predicted risks of mortality and longer hospital lengths of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery; some consider it a contraindication to robotic-assisted approaches. We analyzed the feasibility and safety of totally endoscopic robotic mitral valve surgery (TERMS) in patients ≥70 years. From 5/11 to 4/18, 570 consecutive patients underwent TERMS by the same 2-surgeon team utilizing the da Vinci Xi Surgical System. Differences in patient demographics, intraoperative variables, and outcomes were analyzed between septo-octogenarian (patients ≥70 years) and younger patients (70 years). Patients requiring left ventricle patch reconstruction following mitral annular calcification resection were excluded. For those patients with STS predicted risk scores (n = 439), our outcomes were compared to those STS predictions. Patients ≥70 comprised 25% of our TERMS cohort. Patients ≥70 had higher rates of preoperative atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure, and significantly higher STS predicted risks of mortality. Patients ≥70 had greater incidence of concomitant cryoablation, hybrid percutaneous coronary intervention, and tricuspid repair. Patients ≥70 did not have longer cardiopulmonary bypass or aortic occlusion times. Thirty-day mortality was similar between groups (P = 0.151). Median LOS was 1 day longer for patients ≥70, 4 vs 3 days (P0.001). Short LOS (6 days) was achieved in 72% of patients ≥70, markedly outperforming the STS predicted rates (36%). Advanced age is not a limiting factor for robotic mitral valve surgery in most patients. TERMS in patients ≥70 years matched STS benchmark performance outcomes and provided excellent recovery as evidenced by the short LOS (6 days) experienced by the majority of septo-octogenarian patients.

Background Several studies have described improved survival with double lung transplant (DLT) compared with single lung transplant (SLT) in pulmonary fibrosis. To avoid the innate selection bias of including patients exclusively listed for SLT or DLT, this study analyzed those deemed appropriate for either procedure at time of listing. Methods All consecutive adult lung transplants for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis provided by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients were retrospectively reviewed (2007-2017). Isolated lobar transplants (n = 11) or patients listed only for SLT (n = 1834) or DLT (n = 2372) were excluded. Group stratification was based on the ultimate procedure (SLT vs DLT). Group propensity matching was performed based on 24 recipient and donor characteristics. Recipient demographics, donor demographics, and outcomes were compared between groups. Results During the study period 45% (974/2179) and 55% (1205/2179) of patients ultimately received SLT and DLT, respectively. After propensity matching 466 matched patients remained in each group. SLT patients were less likely to require prolonged (>48 hours) ventilator support than DLT patients. There was also a trend toward reduced rates of posttransplant renal failure and hospital length of stay in SLT recipients. Whether analyzed by time of listing or time of transplant, survival was similar between groups. Conclusions In recipients concurrently listed for SLT and DLT overall survival was similar regardless of the eventual procedure. These data suggest that the previously purported survival advantage for DLT may purely represent selection bias and should not preclude the use of SLT in appropriately selected idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients.

Background The national opioid epidemic may have expanded the donor pool for lung transplantation, but concerns remain regarding infectious risks and allograft function. This study compared donor/recipient characteristics, outcomes, and reasons for organ discard between overdose death donors (ODD) and all other mechanism-of-death donors. Methods Data on adult lung transplants from 2000-2017 were provided by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Pulmonary allografts used in multiple organ transplantations were excluded. Donor/recipient demographics, outcomes, and organ discard were analyzed with regards to ODD since 2010. Discard analysis was limited to donors who had at least one organ transplanted but their pulmonary allografts discarded. Results From 2010-2017, 7.3% (962/13,196) of lung transplantations were from ODD, over a 3-fold increase from the 2.1% (164/7,969) in 2000-2007. ODD were younger but more likely to have a history of smoking, hepatitis C, or an abnormal bronchoscopy finding. Overall survival was similar between ODD and non-ODD groups. ODD of discarded pulmonary allografts were younger and more likely to be hepatitis C positive, but were less likely to have a history of smoking than their non-ODD counterparts. Conclusions Rates of ODD utilization in lung transplantation have increased in accordance with the opioid epidemic, but there remains a significant pool of ODD pulmonary allografts with favorable characteristics that are discarded. With no significant difference in survival between ODD and non-ODD recipients, further expansion of this donor pool may be appropriate and pulmonary allografts should not be discarded based solely on ODD status.

The national opioid epidemic has expanded the donor pool for heart transplantation, but concerns remain regarding infectious risk and allograft function. This study compared donor and recipient characteristics, outcomes, and reasons for organ discard between overdose-death donors (ODDs) and donors with all other mechanism of death.Data on adult cardiac transplants from 2010 to 2017 were provided by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Cardiac allografts used in multiple organ transplantations were excluded. Recipient and donor characteristics and organ discard were analyzed with regard to ODDs. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests described mortality survival.A total of 1,710 of 15,904 (10.8%) cardiac transplantations were from ODDs, approximately a 10-fold increase from 2000 (1.2%). ODDs were more frequently older than 40 years of age (87.2% vs 70.1%; p0.001), had higher rates of substance abuse, were more likely hepatitis C positive (1.3% vs 0.2%; p0.001), and less frequently required inotropic support at the time of procurement (38.4% vs 44.8%; p0.001). Overall survival was not different between the groups (p = 0.066). Discarded ODD allografts were more likely to be hepatitis C positive (30.8% vs 5.3%; p0.001) and to be identified as conveying increased risk by the Public Health Services (63.3% vs 13.2%; p0.001), but they were less likely to be discarded because of a diseased organ state (28.2% vs 36.1%; p0.001).Rates of ODDs have increased corresponding with the worsening opioid epidemic. Even though ODDs have higher rates of hepatitis C, cardiac allograft quality indices are favorable, and recipient outcomes are similar when compared with non-ODDs, a finding indicating that greater use of this donor pool may be appropriate.

Background The lung allocation score (LAS) was designed to optimize the use of pulmonary allografts based on anticipated pretransplant survival and posttransplant outcome. Hospital admission status, not included in the LAS, has not been comprehensively investigated with regard to organ allocation. The objective of this study was to determine whether pretransplant hospital admission status was independently associated with posttransplant mortality and whether high center volume was associated with improved survival in that cohort. Methods All consecutive adult lung transplants provided by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients were retrospectively reviewed (from 2007 to 2017). Group stratification was performed based on admission status at the time of transplantation. A Cox proportional hazard regression was used to determine independent associations with posttransplant mortality. Results During the study period, 3747 of 18,416 recipients (20%) were admitted to the hospital at the time of transplantation. Compared with nonadmitted recipients, LAS were significantly higher and waitlist times significantly shorter. Admitted recipients had higher rates of prolonged mechanical ventilation, higher rates of posttransplant dialysis, and longer posttransplant lengths of stay. Pretransplant admission to a low-volume center conferred significantly worse survival compared with nonadmitted patients, and high-volume centers were independently associated with improved survival compared with low-volume centers. Conclusions Hospital admission status is associated with increased posttransplant mortality independent of the LAS and the factors from which it is calculated. However, adjusted survival analysis demonstrates that admission to a high-volume center appears to be independently associated with improved survival compared with low-volume centers.

Background Anastomotic complications occur in 7% to 18% of lung transplant recipients, among which airway dehiscence (AD) is particularly catastrophic. Using multi-institutional registry data, this study compared preoperative recipient/donor risk factors and outcomes in patients with and without AD and analyzed the effect of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on the incidence of AD. Methods Data on adult lung transplants from 2007 to 2017 were provided by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Patients receiving isolated lobar transplantation and patients with unknown AD status were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent risk factors for AD. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests describe mortality and graft survival. Results Of 18 122 lung transplants, 275 (1.5%) experienced AD. While the incidence of ECMO steadily increased from 0.7% to 5.9% over the study period, the incidence of AD remained relatively constant. Multivariable analysis revealed recipient male gender and prolonged ( > 48 hours) posttransplant mechanical ventilation as independent predictive factors for AD, while advanced donor age and single left lung transplant were protective factors. Recipient chronic steroid use, recipient diabetes, donor diabetes, and donor smoking history were not predictive of AD. Mortality and graft failure were significantly worse in the AD group. Conclusions Despite increased ECMO utilization, the incidence of AD has remained stable. Multiple independent risk factors for AD were identified and poor postoperative outcomes confirmed. However, many known impediments to wound healing such as recipient chronic steroid use, recipient and donor diabetes, and donor smoking were not identified as risk factors for AD, reinforcing the critical role of technical performance.

Purpose The opioid epidemic has expanded the cardiac donor pool, but the concern for primary graft dysfunction (PGD) remains a barrier to wider utilization of these hearts. We analyzed donor characteristics in transplanted and discarded cardiac allografts from overdosed donors (ODD) to determine if viable ODD hearts are being unnecessarily discarded due to inappropriate bias. Methods Data on adult cardiac transplantation from 2010-2017 were provided by the SRTR. Eight donor characteristics associated with PGD were analyzed: age, gender, hypertension, high creatinine, cocaine abuse, inotropic support, LVEF, and cardiac arrest. Donor characteristics of transplanted and discarded hearts were compared between ODD and non-ODD. Results ODD comprised 11% (1710/15904) of transplanted hearts and 7% (2600/32678) of discarded hearts. Among transplanted hearts, ODD more frequently were younger than 50 (98% vs 90%), did not have hypertension (86% vs 83%), and did not require inotropic support (62% vs 55%) compared to non-ODD; ODD less frequently were male (63% vs 70%), had no history of cocaine abuse (57% vs 84%), or had creatinine ≤1.5 (62% vs 81%). Among discarded hearts, ODD more frequently were younger than 50 (87% vs 46%), had no history of hypertension (78% vs 49%), and did not require inotropic support (51% vs 41%); ODD less often had no history of cocaine abuse (50% vs 86%) or creatinine ≤1.5 (61% vs 69%) (Table). Donors known to have at least 6 of 8 favorable qualities comprised 36% (942/2600) of discarded ODD hearts, compared to 28% (9152/32678) of discarded non-ODD hearts (p Conclusion ODD hearts with favorable qualities are being discarded at disproportionally higher rates than non-ODD hearts. Further studies and better documentation are needed to understand current discard practices and if further expansion into this donor pool is appropriate.

Purpose Controversy remains over the mortality benefit of single (SLT) versus double lung transplantation (DLT) in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Independent of this controversy, hesitancy to perform SLT in this population exists on the basis of unclear one year functional status. We compared functional status at one year between IPF patients listed for both who ultimately received SLT or DLT. Methods All consecutive adult lung transplants for IPF provided by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients were retrospectively reviewed (2007-2017). Isolated lobar transplants (n=4), patients listed only for SLT (n=1834) or DLT (n=2372), and patients with missing functional status data (n=715) were excluded. Group stratification was based on the ultimate procedure (SLT or DLT). Group propensity matching was performed based on 25 recipient/donor characteristics. We compared ‘good functional status’, defined as >70%, at one year. Results During the study period, 45% (660/1464) and 55% (804/1464) of patients listed for both procedures ultimately received SLT and DLT, respectively. After propensity matching, 341 matched patients remained in each group. Donor and recipient characteristics were similar (Table). There was no statistically significant difference in ‘good functional status’ at one year between SLT (77%, 264/341) and DLT (81%, 275/341) (p=0.301). The same trend is present for patients younger than 50 who receive SLT (82%, 23/28) versus DLT (94%, 34/36) (p=0.225), and patients between 50 and 60 who receive SLT (78%, 86/110) versus DLT (84%, 97/115) (p=0.305). The opposite trend is noted in patients older than 70 who receive SLT (72%, 13/18) versus DLT (61%, 11/18) (p=0.725). Conclusion In this cohort of lung transplant recipients listed for both SLT and DLT, functional status was statistically similar between groups, even in younger recipients. This data suggests that SLT should not be precluded in IPF patients on the basis of expected functional status at one year.