Search

Over-the-counter (OTC) oral supplements are increasingly used by consumers and recommended by dermatologists for managing various dermatologic conditions. Despite their popularity, these supplements often lack standardized regulation, potentially posing risks to both patients and clinicians. This review examines the importance of evaluating OTC oral supplements in dermatology, focusing on the prevalence and consequences of adulterated products and the implications of different authenticity labels for consumer education and clinical practice. Various authenticity labels are discussed, such as USP, NSF, ConsumerLab.com, and UL, which aim to verify supplement quality and safety. However, these labels have different criteria and methods for testing, leading to further confusion about their meanings and comparisons. This review provides practical guidance on evaluating OTC oral supplements and interpreting authenticity labels, aiming to help dermatologists and consumers make informed decisions and improve outcomes., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethical approval: The patients in this manuscript have given written informed consent to publication of their case details. Explain why the trial was not registered: This study did not involve drugs, devices or biologics that are regulated by the FDA and was not federally funded. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: The overall landscape of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has not been thoroughly investigated in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer. Data are also lacking on how well HRQoL at the time of cancer diagnosis can prognosticate long-term survival in AYA survivors., Patients and Methods: We included 3,497 survivors of AYA cancer (age 15-39 years at diagnosis) who completed the Short-Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) HRQoL questionnaire at diagnosis. Physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores were generated, with scores <50 representing poor HRQoL. Differences in HRQoL by patient characteristics and tumor type were investigated using violin plots and t tests/analysis of variance. The effect of HRQoL on overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazards models., Results: Overall mean PCS and MCS scores in this racially/ethnically diverse cohort (64% White, 19% Hispanic, 10% Black, and 7% other race/ethnicity) were 43.6 and 46.7, respectively. Women with breast cancer reported the most favorable PCS (50.8), and those with cervical cancer reported the lowest MCS (42.8). Age at diagnosis was associated positively with PCS (P<.001) and inversely with MCS (P<.001). Females had higher PCS yet lower MCS than males (both P<.001). Marginalized racial and ethnic populations reported lower PCS than White patients (P<.001). Physical and mental HRQoL were prognostic and associated with increased risk of poor survival (hazard ratio, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.72-2.21 for physical HRQoL, and 1.26; 95% CI, 1.13-1.40 for mental HRQoL)., Conclusions: Physical and mental HRQoL at diagnosis vary across patient characteristics in AYA cancer survivors. Poor HRQoL at diagnosis may be a prognosticator of diminished overall survival among AYA cancer survivors.

Background: Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation has been linked to adverse health outcomes, yet it is unclear whether neighborhood-level social determinants of health (SDOH) measures affect overall survival in adolescent and young adult patients with cancer., Methods: This study used a diverse cohort of adolescent and young adult patients with cancer (N = 10 261) seen at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Zip codes were linked to Area Deprivation Index (ADI) values, a validated neighborhood-level SDOH measure, with higher ADI values representing worse SDOH., Results: ADI was statistically significantly worse (P < .050) for Black (61.7) and Hispanic (65.3) patients than for White patients (51.2). Analysis of ADI by cancer type showed statistically significant differences, mainly driven by worse ADI in patients with cervical cancer (62.3) than with other cancers. In multivariable models including sex, age at diagnosis, cancer diagnosis, and race and ethnicity, risk of shorter survival for people residing in neighborhoods with the least favorable ADI quartile was greater than for individuals in the most favorable ADI quartile (hazard ratio = 1.09, 95% confidence interval = 1.00 to 1.19, P = .043)., Conclusion: Adolescent and young adult patients with cancer and the worst ADI values experienced a nearly 10% increase in risk of dying than patients with more favorable ADI values. This effect was strongest among White adolescent and young adult survivors. Although the magnitude of the effect of ADI on survival was moderate, the presence of a relationship between neighborhood-level SDOH and survival among patients who received care at a tertiary cancer center suggests that ADI is a meaningful predictor of survival. These findings provide intriguing evidence for potential interventions aimed at supporting adolescent and young adult patients with cancer from disadvantaged neighborhoods., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

RASopathies are a group of disorders characterized by mutations in the RAS-MAPK pathway. RAS-MAP signaling plays a critical role in cell differentiation, proliferation, and survival. Germline mutations can result in distinctive syndromes, including Noonan syndrome, Costello syndrome, and neurofibromatosis type 1. Mosaic RASopathies can present as localized cutaneous lesions like epidermal nevi and nevus sebaceous, or more extensive conditions such as encephalocraniocutaneous lipomatosis. We review the heterogenous presentation of RAS mutations, discuss new targeted therapies, and highlight areas of uncertainty, including carcinogenesis risk and appropriate screening., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)