Search

Objectives: Use of Shewhart control charts in quality improvement (QI) initiatives is increasing. These charts are typically used in one or more phases of the Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) cycle to monitor summaries of process and outcome data, abstracted from clinical information systems, over time. We summarize methodological criteria of Shewhart control charts and investigate adherence of published QI studies to these criteria.Methods: We searched Medline, Embase and CINAHL for studies using Shewhart control charts in QI processes in direct patient care. We extracted methodological criteria for Shewhart control charts, and for the use of these charts in PDSA cycles, from textbooks and methodological literature.Results: We included 34 studies, presenting 64 control charts of which 40 control charts plotted two phases of the PDSA cycle. The criterion to use 10-35 data points in a control chart was least adhered to (48.4% non-adherence). Other criteria were: transformation of the data in case of a skewed distribution (43.7% non adherence), when comparing data from two phases of the PDSA cycle the Plan phase (the first phase) needs to be stable (40.0% non-adherence), using a maximum of four different rules to detect special cause variation (14.1% non-adherence), and setting control limits at three standard deviations from the mean (all control charts adhered).Conclusion: There is room for improvement with regard to the methodological construction of Shewhart control charts used in QI processes. Higher adherence to all methodological criteria will decrease the risk of incorrect conclusions about the process being monitored. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

What is this patient's prognosis regarding graft rejection? Do patients using a particular drug live longer than those not using it? How does this co-morbidity affect access to transplantation? To answer this type of questions one needs to perform survival analysis. This paper focuses on the Kaplan-Meier method, the most popular method used for survival analysis. It makes it possible to calculate the incidence rate of events like recovery of renal function, myocardial infarction or death by using information from all subjects at risk for these events. It explains how the method works, how survival probabilities are calculated, survival data can be summarized and survival in groups can be compared using the logrank test for hypothesis testing. In addition, it provides some guidance regarding the presentation of survival plots. Finally, it discusses the limitations of the Kaplan-Meier method and refers to other methods that better serve additional purposes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. So far, little attention has been paid to the value of dialysis adequacy for patients' quality of life (QL). Therefore we studied the impact of demographic, Clinical, and dialysis characteristics on physical symptoms and perceived QL. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Epidemiological studies aim at assessing the relationship between exposures and outcomes. Clinicians are interested in knowing not only whether a link between a given exposure (e.g. smoking) and a certain outcome (e.g. myocardial infarction) is statistically significant, but also the magnitude of this relationship. The 'measures of effect' are indexes that summarize the strength of the link between exposures and outcomes and can help the clinician in taking decisions in every day clinical practice. In epidemiological studies, the effect of exposure can be measured both in relative and absolute terms. The risk ratio, the incidence rate ratio, and the odds ratio are relative measures of effect. Risk difference is an absolute measure of effect and it is calculated by subtracting the risk of the outcome in exposed individuals from that of unexposed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In Europe there is considerable variation in mortality on renal replacement therapy (RRT). The causes of this variation are still poorly understood. We hypothesized that differences in mortality in the general population contribute to differences in mortality on RRT. To evaluate this relationship, we studied general population statistics obtained from Eurostat and the individual data of 67,692 patients on RRT from 15 national and regional renal registries. These 15 registries were divided into two geographical regions: North and South Europe. Cox regression was used to assess the relative risk of death (RR) for each region with adjustment for age, gender, diabetes, and additionally general population mortality. In patients on RRT the age, gender and diabetes adjusted RR of death was 0.65 (95% CI (0.64-0.66)) for South compared to North, while in the general population the age and gender standardized RR of death was 0.91. After adjustment for general population mortality in addition to age, gender, and diabetes, the RR of death for patients on RRT in the South changed from 0.65 to 0.74 (95% CI (0.72-0.75)), which indicates that general population mortality accounted for 26% of the region-related mortality difference on RRT. In conclusion, within Europe there exist considerable international differences in the mortality of patients on RRT. Twenty-six percent of the European north-south mortality difference in RRT could be attributed to differences in general population mortality. Our data support the hypothesis that general population mortality is an important factor to take into account when making RRT mortality comparisons. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cancer and its treatment may lead to kidney injury and the need for kidney replacement therapy (KRT). We identified 287 pediatric KRT patients with a history of malignancy from the European Society for Paediatric Nephrology/European Renal Association Registry. Of these, 197 had cancer as a primary cause of KRT (group 1) and 90 had a malignancy diagnosis before KRT (group 2). Two matched controls without malignancy were randomly selected for each patient. Data were complemented with a questionnaire. Median time to kidney transplantation (KT) from KRT initiation was 2.4 (IQR: 1.5-4.7), 1.5 (IQR: 0.4-3.3), 3.6 (IQR: 1.3 to Q3 not reached), and 1.1 (IQR: 0.3-3.6) years for group 1, their controls, group 2, and their controls, respectively. Overall 10-year mortality for those on KRT was higher among cancer patients vs controls in group 1: 16% vs 9% (adjusted hazard ratio 2.02, 95% CI: 1.21-3.37) and in group 2: 23% vs 14% (adjusted hazard ratio 2.32, 95% CI: 1.11-4.85). In contrast, 10-year patient survival after the first KT was comparable to controls (93% vs 96%; 100% vs 94%, in groups 1 and 2, respectively). In summary, childhood cancer survivors' KT was delayed, and their overall mortality when on KRT was increased, but once transplanted, their long-term outcome was similar to other KT recipients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose as described by the American Journal of Transplantation., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Inherited kidney diseases (IKD) and congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) are causes of kidney failure requiring kidney replacement therapy (KRT) that major renal registries usually amalgamate into the primary renal disease (PRD) category 'miscellaneous' or in the glomerulonephritis or pyelonephritis categories. This makes IKDs invisible (except for polycystic kidney disease) and may negatively influence the use of genetic testing, which may identify a cause for IKDs and some CAKUT., Methods: We have re-examined the etiology of KRT by composing a separate IKD and CAKUT PRD group using data from the European Renal Association (ERA) Registry., Results: In 2019, IKD-CAKUT was the fourth most common cause of kidney failure among incident KRT patients, accounting for 8.9% of cases (IKD 7.4% [including 5.0% ADPKD], CAKUT 1.5%), behind diabetes (23.0%), hypertension (14.4%) and glomerulonephritis (10.6%). IKD-CAKUT was the most common cause of kidney failure among patients younger than 20 years (41.0% of cases), but their incidence rate was highest among those aged 45-74 years (22.5 per million age-related population). Among prevalent KRT patients, IKD-CAKUT (18.5%) and glomerulonephritis (18.7%) were the two most common causes of kidney failure overall, while IKD-CAKUT was the most common cause in women (21.6%) and in patients younger than 45 years (29.1%)., Conclusion: IKD and CAKUT are common causes of kidney failure among KRT patients. Distinct categorization of IKD and CAKUT better characterizes the epidemiology of the causes of chronic kidney disease, and highlights the importance of genetic testing in the diagnostic workup of CKD., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)

Background: Abnormal fluid and plasma sodium concentrations are established prognostic factors for patients on hemodialysis. However, the cumulative effects of abnormal salt and water and potential effect modifications and the effect of dialysate sodium remain incompletely understood., Methods: The study followed 68,196 patients on incident hemodialysis from 875 dialysis clinics in 25 countries over 10 years (2010–2020) investigating dose-response patterns between cumulative exposure time of fluid overload/depletion (measured by bioimpedance spectroscopy using the Fresenius Body Composition Monitor), abnormal plasma sodium levels, low dialysate sodium, and all-cause mortality. We calculated time-varying cumulative exposure (in months) of relative fluid overload (any degree; >7% or severe; >13 or >15% in women or men, respectively) and fluid depletion (<−7%), hypo- or hypernatremia (sodium <135 or >145 mmol/L, respectively), low dialysate sodium (≤138 mmol/L), and estimated hazard ratios for all-cause mortality using a multivariable Cox model., Results: Of 2,123,957 patient-months, 61% were spent in any degree of fluid overload, 4% in fluid depletion, 11% in hyponatremia, and 1% in hypernatremia. Any degree of fluid overload was associated with higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio peak at 3.42 [95% confidence intervals, 3.12 to 3.75] relative to no exposure), and this association with all-cause mortality seemed to be stronger with severe fluid overload. The risk pattern associated with hyponatremia was approximately linear in the first four patient-months and then plateaued after the fourth patient-month. We did not observe effect modification between fluid overload and hyponatremia., Conclusions: Even mild fluid overload was associated with higher mortality in patients on hemodialysis. Whether more stringent fluid management results in clinical improvement requires further investigation., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Society of Nephrology)

Background: A low-protein diet (LPD) is recommended to patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), whereas geriatric guidelines recommend a higher amount of protein. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of LPD treatment in older adults with advanced CKD., Methods: The EQUAL study is a prospective, observational study including patients ≥65 years of age with an incident estimated glomerular filtration rate <20 ml/min/1.73 m2 in six European countries with follow-up through 6 years. Nutritional status was assessed by a 7-point subjective global assessment (SGA) every 3-6 months. Prescribed diet (g protein/kg of bodyweight) was recorded on every study visit; measured protein intake was available in three countries. Time to death and decline in nutritional status (SGA decrease of ≥2 points) were analysed using marginal structural models with dynamic inverse probability of treatment and censoring weights., Results: Of 1738 adults (631 prescribed LPD at any point during follow-up), there were 1319 with repeated SGA measurements, of which 267 (20%) decreased in SGA ≥2 points and 565 (32.5%) who died. There was no difference in survival or decrease in nutritional status for patients prescribed a LPD ≤0.8 g/kg ideal bodyweight {odds ratio [OR] for mortality 1.15 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86-1.55)] and OR for decrease in SGA 1.11 [95% CI 0.74-1.66]} in the adjusted models. In patients prescribed a LPD <0.6 g/kg ideal bodyweight, the results were similar. There was a significant interaction with LPD and older age >75 years, lower SGA and higher comorbidity burden for both mortality and nutritional status decline., Conclusions: In older adults with CKD approaching end-stage kidney disease, a traditional LPD prescribed and monitored according to routine clinical practice in Europe appears to be safe., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)

Background: In 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused disruptions in kidney replacement therapy (KRT) services worldwide. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 on the incidence of KRT, kidney transplantation activity, mortality and prevalence of KRT across Europe., Methods: Patients receiving KRT were included from 17 countries providing data to the European Renal Association Registry. The epidemiology of KRT in 2020 was compared with average data from the period 2017-2019. Changes occurring during the first and second waves of the pandemic were also explored., Results: The incidence of KRT was 6.2% lower in 2020 compared with 2017-2019, with the lowest point (-22.7%) during the first wave in April. The decrease varied across countries, was smaller in males (-5.2%) than in females (-8.2%) and was moderate for peritoneal dialysis (-3.7%) and haemodialysis (-5.4%) but substantial for pre-emptive kidney transplantation (-23.6%). The kidney transplantation rate decreased by 22.5%, reaching a nadir of -80.1% during the first wave, and was greatest for living donor kidney transplants (-30.5%). While in most countries the kidney transplantation rate decreased, in the Nordic/Baltic countries and Greece there was no clear decrease. In dialysis patients, mortality increased by 11.4% and was highest in those 65-74 years of age (16.1%), in those with diabetes as the primary renal disease (15.1%) and in those on haemodialysis (12.4%). In transplant recipients, the mortality was 25.8% higher, but there were no subgroups that stood out. In contrast to the rising prevalence of KRT observed over the past decades across Europe, the prevalence at the end of 2020 (N = 317 787) resembled that of 2019 (N = 317 077)., Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a substantial impact on the incidence of KRT, kidney transplant activity, mortality of KRT and prevalence of KRT in Europe with variations across countries., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)

Background: This paper compares the most recent data on the incidence and prevalence of kidney replacement therapy (KRT), kidney transplantation rates, and mortality on KRT from Europe to those from the United States (US), including comparisons of treatment modalities (haemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD), and kidney transplantation (KTx))., Methods: Data were derived from the annual reports of the European Renal Association (ERA) Registry and the United States Renal Data System (USRDS). The European data include information from national and regional renal registries providing the ERA Registry with individual patient data. Additional analyses were performed to present results for all participating European countries together., Results: In 2021, the KRT incidence in the US (409.7 per million population (pmp)) was almost 3-fold higher than in Europe (144.4 pmp). Despite the substantial difference in KRT incidence, approximately the same proportion of patients initiated HD (Europe: 82%, US: 84%), PD (14%; 13%, respectively), or underwent pre-emptive KTx (4%; 3%, respectively). The KRT prevalence in the US (2436.1 pmp) was 2-fold higher than in Europe (1187.8 pmp). Within Europe, approximately half of all prevalent patients were living with a functioning graft (47%), while in the US, this was one third (32%). The number of kidney transplantations performed was almost twice as high in the US (77.0 pmp) compared to Europe (41.6 pmp). The mortality of patients receiving KRT was 1.6-fold higher in the US (157.3 per 1000 patient years) compared to Europe (98.7 per 1000 patient years)., Conclusions: The US had a much higher KRT incidence, prevalence, and mortality compared to Europe, and despite a higher kidney transplantation rate, a lower proportion of prevalent patients with a functioning graft., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)

The burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and its risk factors are projected to rise in parallel with the rapidly ageing global population. By 2050, the prevalence of CKD category G3-G5 may exceed 10% in some regions, resulting in substantial health and economic burdens that will disproportionately affect lower-income countries. The extent to which the CKD epidemic can be mitigated depends largely on the uptake of prevention efforts to address modifiable risk factors, the implementation of cost-effective screening programmes for early detection of CKD in high-risk individuals and widespread access and affordability of new-generation kidney-protective drugs to prevent the development and delay the progression of CKD. Older patients require a multidisciplinary integrated approach to manage their multimorbidity, polypharmacy, high rates of adverse outcomes, mental health, fatigue and other age-related symptoms. In those who progress to kidney failure, comprehensive conservative management should be offered as a viable option during the shared decision-making process to collaboratively determine a treatment approach that respects the values and wishes of the patient. Interventions that maintain or improve quality of life, including pain management and palliative care services when appropriate, should also be made available., (© 2024. Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: Primary glomerular disease (PGD) is a major cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) leading to kidney replacement therapy (KRT). We aimed to describe incidence (trends) in individuals starting KRT for ESKD due to PGD and to examine their survival and causes of death., Methods: We used data from the European Renal Association (ERA) Registry on 69 854 patients who started KRT for ESKD due to PGD between 2000 and 2019. ERA primary renal disease codes were used to define six PGD subgroups. We examined age and sex standardized incidence, trend of the incidence and survival., Results: The standardized incidence of KRT for ESKD due to PGD was 16.6 per million population (pmp), ranging from 8.6 pmp in Serbia to 20.0 pmp in France. Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) had the highest incidences, of 4.6 pmp and 2.6 pmp, respectively. Histologically non-examined PGDs represented over 50% of cases in Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Romania and were also common in Greece, Estonia, Belgium and Sweden. The incidence declined from 18.6 pmp in 2000 to 14.5 pmp in 2013, after which it stabilized. All PGD subgroups had 5-year survival probabilities above 50%, with crescentic glomerulonephritis having the highest risk of death [adjusted hazard ratio 1.8 (95% confidence interval 1.6-1.9)] compared with IgAN. Cardiovascular disease was the most common cause of death (33.9%)., Conclusion: The incidence of KRT for ESKD due to PGD showed large differences between countries and was highest and increasing for IgAN and FSGS. Lack of kidney biopsy facilities in some countries may have affected accurate assignment of the cause of ESKD. The recognition of the incidence and outcomes of KRT among different PGD subgroups may contribute to a more individualized patient care approach., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)

Background and Hypothesis: Young adults starting kidney replacement therapy (KRT) during childhood and reaching their 18th birthday (i.e. adult survivors of childhood KRT) form a challenging population of interest to nephrologists treating adults, as during this period there will be a transition to adult renal centres. Nonetheless, few studies have focused on the epidemiology of KRT in this group. We aimed to provide an update on these patients' characteristics, treatment history, graft and patient survival, to report their 5-year prognosis, and expected remaining lifetime., Methods: Data on KRT patients reaching their 18th birthday in 2008-2019 were collected from 21 European countries/regions providing individual patient data to the European Renal Association (ERA) Registry. Patient characteristics and treatment trajectories were examined before and after turning 18 years. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression were used for patient and graft survival analyses., Results: In total, 2944 patients were included. The proportion of adult survivors initiating KRT at a very young age (0-4 years), and undergoing pre-emptive kidney transplantation increased. Unadjusted 5-year patient survival was 96.9% (95% CI: 96.2-97.5). Dialysis patients had a higher risk of death than kidney transplant recipients (adjusted hazard ratio 5.44 (95% CI: 3.34-8.86)). Between ages 18 and 23 years, about 21% of the adult survivors lost their kidney transplant and 34% of the dialysis patients continued this treatment. Compared with the general population, life expectancy for eighteen-year-old kidney transplant and dialysis patients was 17 and 40 years shorter, respectively., Conclusion: Life expectancy of 18-year-old kidney transplant recipients was lower compared with the general population. Yet, having a functioning kidney graft at age 18 years resulted in better outcomes than being on dialysis. Nevertheless, between ages 18 and 23 years, about one-fifth of the kidney grafts failed and one-third of the patients remained on dialysis., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)

True linear relationships are rare in clinical data. Despite this, linearity is often assumed during analyses, leading to potentially biased estimates and inaccurate conclusions. In this introductory paper, we aim to first describe - in a non-mathematical manner - how to identify non-linear relationships. Various methods are then discussed that can be applied to deal with non-linearity, including transformations, polynomials, splines, and Generalized Additive Models (GAMs), along with their strengths and weaknesses. Finally, we illustrate the use of these methods with a practical example from nephrology, providing guidance on how to report the results from non-linear relationships., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)

Soluble decoy receptors (DR) are circulating proteins that act as molecular traps for ligands that modulate various signalling pathways. These proteins can be exploited as biomarkers and, in some cases, as drugs in various disease contexts. Inflammation is a key area where DRs have shown significant potential. By binding to pro-inflammatory cytokines, inflammatory DRs, such as soluble tumour necrosis factor receptors (sTNFRs), can inhibit downstream inflammatory signalling. This modulation of the inflammatory response holds promise for therapeutic interventions in various inflammatory conditions, including cardiovascular and chronic kidney diseases. Soluble DRs for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) bind to advanced glycation end products (AGEs), reducing their detrimental effects on vascular function and atherosclerosis. High circulating sRAGE levels are associated with a lower risk for CV events, highlighting the potential of these soluble receptors for assessing the role of AGEs in CV diseases and managing the attendant risk. DRs may serve as biomarkers and therapeutic agents to advance our understanding of disease mechanisms and improve patients' outcomes. Their ability to modulate signalling pathways in a controlled manner opens up new opportunities for therapeutic interventions in various diseases, ranging from inflammation to cardiovascular and renal disorders., Competing Interests: C.Z. and F.M. are members of the Clinical Kidney Journal Editorial Board., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)

Patients with kidney disease have an uncertain future with prognosis varying greatly per patient. To get a better idea of what the future holds and tailor interventions to the individual patient, prediction models can be of great value. Before a prediction model can be applied in practice, its performance should be measured in target populations of interest (i.e., external validation) and whether it helps improve clinical practice (i.e., whether it impacts clinical practice) should be determined. The impact would ideally be determined using an impact trial, but such a trial is often not feasible, and the impact of prediction models is therefore rarely assessed. As a result, prediction models that may not be so impactful may end up in clinical practice and impactful models may not be implemented due to a lack of impact studies. Ultimately, many prediction models end up never being implemented, resulting in much research waste. To allow researchers to get an indication of a prediction model's impact on clinical practice, alternative methods to assess a prediction model's impact are important. In this paper, we discuss several alternatives, including interviews, case-based surveys, decision comparisons, outcome modelling, before-after analyses, and decision curve analyses. We discuss the general idea behind these approaches, including what information can be gathered from such studies and important pitfalls. Lastly, we provide examples of the different alternatives., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)

Background: Preemptive kidney transplantation has better outcomes when compared to transplantation after dialysis. We aimed to examine trends in preemptive kidney transplantation between 2000 and 2019 in Europe and to provide an overview of associated policies, barriers and initiatives., Methods: Adult patients from 12 European countries who received a preemptive kidney transplant were included. The representatives of the registries providing these data were questioned on the policies, barriers and initiatives around preemptive kidney transplantation., Results: Between 2000 and 2019, 20 251 adults underwent preemptive kidney transplantation (11 169 from living donors, 8937 from deceased donors). The proportion of first kidney transplantations that were preemptive more than doubled from 7% in 2000 to 18% in 2019, reflecting a similar relative increase for living donor kidney recipients (from 21% to 43%) and deceased donor kidney recipients (from 4% to 11%). Large international differences were found. The increase in preemptive kidney transplantation was observed across all age, sex and primary renal disease groups. Countries had similar criteria for preemptive waitlisting. Barriers mentioned included donor shortage, late referral to the transplant center and long donor or recipient work-up. Suggested initiatives included raising awareness on the possibility of preemptive kidney transplantation, earlier start and shorter work-up time for recipient and living donor., Conclusions: Over the last two decades the proportion of patients receiving a first kidney transplant preemptively has more than doubled, reflecting a similar relative increase for living and deceased donor kidney recipients., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)

This paper discusses the use of biomarkers in clinical practice and biomedical research. Biomarkers are measurable characteristics that can be used to indicate the presence or absence of a disease or to track the progression of a disease. They can also be used to predict how a patient will respond to a particular treatment. Biomarkers have enriched clinical practice and disease prognosis by providing measurable characteristics that indicate biological processes. They offer valuable insights into disease susceptibility, progression, and treatment response, aiding drug development and personalized medicine. However, developing and implementing biomarkers come with challenges that must be addressed. Rigorous testing, standardization of assays, and consideration of ethical factors are crucial in ensuring the reliability and validity of biomarkers. Reliability is vital in biomarker research. It ensures accurate measurements by preventing biases and facilitating robust correlations with outcomes. Conversely, validation examines which and how many biomarkers correspond to theoretical constructs and external criteria, establishing their predictive value. Multiple biomarkers are sometimes necessary to represent the complex relationship between exposure and disease outcomes accurately. Susceptibility factors are pivotal in disease states' complex interaction among genetic and environmental factors. Gaining a comprehensive understanding of these factors is essential for effectively interpreting biomarker data and maximizing their clinical usefulness. Using well-validated biomarkers can improve diagnoses, more effective treatment evaluations, and enhanced disease prediction. This, in turn, will contribute to better patient outcomes and drive progress in medicine., Competing Interests: C.Z. is member of the Clinical Kidney Journal Editorial Board., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)

Background: The aim of this study was to provide an overview of age, sex and primary renal disease (PRD) distribution among first kidney transplant recipients across Europe., Method: The European Renal Association (ERA) Registry database was used to obtain data on patients aged 20 years or older receiving their first kidney transplant between 2010 and 2019 from 12 European countries. The numbers and percentages of recipients in each age, sex and PRD group were calculated by country, donor type and year., Results: In total, 99 543 adults received a first kidney transplant. Overall, 23% of the recipients were 65 years or older, 36% were female, and 21% had glomerulonephritis and 15% diabetes mellitus as PRD. Compared with deceased donor kidney transplant recipients, living donor kidney transplant recipients were less often 65 years or older (13% versus 26%), more often had glomerulonephritis (25% versus 20%) and less often diabetes mellitus (8% versus 17%) as PRD. We found large international differences, which were most prominent for age and PRD and less prominent for sex. Over time, the largest change in recipient characteristics was observed for the percentage of recipients aged 65 years or older, increasing from 18% in 2010 to 28% in 2019 for all countries combined with a similar trend in most countries., Conclusion: We observed large differences for age and PRD distribution between recipients of living and deceased donor kidneys and between European countries. Over time, the percentage of older first kidney transplant recipients increased., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)

Improved understanding of differences in kidney disease epidemiology, management and outcomes in men and women could help nephrologists to better meet the needs of their patients from a sex- and gender-specific perspective. Evidence of sex differences in the risk and outcomes of acute kidney injury is mixed and dependent on aetiology. Women have a higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3-5 than men, whereas men have a higher prevalence of albuminuria and hence CKD stages 1-2. Men show a faster decline in kidney function, progress more frequently to kidney failure and have higher mortality and risk of cardiovascular disease than women. However, the protective effect of female sex is reduced with CKD progression. Women are less likely than men to be aware of, screened for and diagnosed with CKD, started on antiproteinuric medication and referred to nephrologist care. They also consistently report a poorer health-related quality of life and a higher symptom burden than men. Women experience greater barriers than men to access the waiting list for kidney transplantation, particularly with respect to older age and obesity. However, women also have longer survival than men after transplantation, which may partly explain the comparable prevalence of transplantation between the sexes., (© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: The European Renal Association (ERA) Registry collects data on kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). This paper is a summary of the ERA Registry Annual Report 2021, including a comparison across treatment modalities., Methods: Data was collected from 54 national and regional registries from 36 countries, of which 35 registries from 18 countries contributed individual patient data and 19 registries from 19 countries contributed aggregated data. Using this data, incidence and prevalence of KRT, kidney transplantation rates, survival probabilities and expected remaining lifetimes were calculated., Result: In 2021, 533.2 million people in the general population were covered by the ERA Registry. The incidence of KRT was 145 per million population (pmp). In incident patients, 55% were 65 years or older, 64% were male, and the most common primary renal disease (PRD) was diabetes (22%). The prevalence of KRT was 1040 pmp. In prevalent patients, 47% were 65 years or older, 62% were male, and the most common PRDs were diabetes and glomerulonephritis/sclerosis (both 16%). On 31 December 2021, 56% of patients received haemodialysis, 5% received peritoneal dialysis, and 39% were living with a functioning graft. The kidney transplantation rate in 2021 was 37 pmp, a majority coming from deceased donors (66%). For patients initiating KRT between 2012-2016, 5-year survival probability was 52%. Compared to the general population, life expectancy was 65% and 68% shorter for males and females receiving dialysis, and 40% and 43% shorter for males and females living with a functioning graft., Competing Interests: None declared., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)