Search

PDF file - 175K, Table S1 Clinical data and sequencing statistics. Table S2: Oligonucleotides for library construction and quantification and BS-MS-primers used for validation of MeDIP-Seq data. Table S3 Top 100 differentially methylated regions between tumor and normal (a) and between FUS+ and FUS- samples (b). Table S4 Correlation of EZH2 expression to expression of homeobox (Holland et al. 2007) and target genes (Yu et al. 2007) and target promoter methylation (+-2kb)

Supplementary Material

PDF file - 64K

PDF file - 947K, Supplementary Fig. S1. Differential methylations in PCa validated by BS-MS experiments. Supplementary Fig. S2. DNA-Methylomes of prostate cancer differ significantly from normal tissues. Supplementary Fig. S3. Global differences in DNA methylation patterns between tumor, normal, FUS+ and FUS- samples. Supplementary Fig. S4 Patientwise patterns of promoter hypermethylation and corresponding gene expression of EZH2 target genes. Supplementary Fig. S5 Methylation of the miRNA-26a genomic region

Table S1. Deep sequencing of ERBB2 does not identify recurrent ERBB2 mutations in LTR tumors.

Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Figure Legends

Supplementary Figures from Role of Tumor-Infiltrating B Cells in Clinical Outcome of Patients with Melanoma Treated With Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib

Purpose:The influence of the transcriptional and immunologic context of mutations on therapeutic outcomes with targeted therapy in cancer has not been well defined. BRAF V600E–mutant (BM) colorectal cancer comprises two main transcriptional subtypes, BM1 and BM2. We sought to determine the impact of BM subtype, as well as distinct biological features of those subtypes, on response to BRAF/MEK/EGFR inhibition in patients with colorectal cancer.Patients and Methods:Paired fresh tumor biopsies were acquired at baseline and on day 15 of treatment from all consenting patients with BM colorectal cancer enrolled in a phase II clinical trial of dabrafenib, trametinib, and panitumumab. For each sample, BM subtype, cell cycle, and immune gene signature expression were determined using RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), and a Cox proportional hazards model was applied to determine association with progression-free survival (PFS).Results:Confirmed response rates, median PFS, and median overall survival (OS) were higher in BM1 subtype patients compared with BM2 subtype patients. Evaluation of immune contexture identified greater immune reactivity in BM1, whereas cell-cycle signatures were more highly expressed in BM2. A multivariate model of PFS incorporating BM subtype plus immune and cell-cycle signatures revealed that BM subtype encompasses the majority of the effect.Conclusions:BM subtype is significantly associated with the outcome of combination dabrafenib, trametinib, and panitumumab therapy and may serve as a standalone predictive biomarker beyond mutational status. Our findings support a more nuanced approach to targeted therapeutic decisions that incorporates assessment of transcriptional context.

Purpose:Although patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma can experience long-term survival with BRAF- and MEK-targeted agents or immune checkpoint inhibitors over 5 years, resistance develops in most patients. There is a distinct lack of pretherapeutic biomarkers to identify which patients are likely to benefit from each therapy type. Most research has focused on the predictive role of T cells in antitumor responses as opposed to B cells.Patients and Methods:We conducted prespecified exploratory biomarker analysis using gene expression profiling and digital pathology in 146 patients with previously untreated BRAF V600–mutant metastatic melanoma from the randomized, phase III COMBI-v trial and treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib who had available tumor specimens from screening.Results:Baseline cell-cycle gene expression signature was associated with progression-free survival (P = 0.007). Patients with high T-cell/low B-cell gene signatures had improved median overall survival (not reached [95% confidence interval (CI), 33.8 months–not reached]) compared with patients with high T-cell/high B-cell signatures (19.1 months; 95% CI, 13.4–38.6 months). Patients with high B-cell signatures had high B-cell infiltration into the tumor compartment, corresponding with decreased MAPK activity and increased expression of immunosuppressive markers.Conclusions:B cells may serve as a potential biomarker to predict clinical outcome in patients with advanced melanoma treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib. As separate studies have shown an opposite effect for B-cell levels and response to immunotherapy, B cells may serve as a potential biomarker to facilitate treatment selection. Further validation in a larger patient cohort is needed.

Supplementary Data

Purpose: Dual blockade of HER2 with trastuzumab and lapatinib or pertuzumab has been shown to be superior to single-agent trastuzumab. However, a significant fraction of HER2-overexpressing (HER2+) breast cancers escape from these drug combinations. In this study, we sought to discover the mechanisms of acquired resistance to the combination of lapatinib + trastuzumab.Experimental Design: HER2+ BT474 xenografts were treated with lapatinib + trastuzumab long-term until resistance developed. Potential mechanisms of acquired resistance were evaluated in lapatinib + trastuzumab-resistant (LTR) tumors by targeted capture next-generation sequencing. In vitro experiments were performed to corroborate these findings, and a novel drug combination was tested against LTR xenografts. Gene expression and copy-number analyses were performed to corroborate our findings in clinical samples.Results: LTR tumors exhibited an increase in FGF3/4/19 copy number, together with an increase in FGFR phosphorylation, marked stromal changes in the tumor microenvironment, and reduced tumor uptake of lapatinib. Stimulation of BT474 cells with FGF4 promoted resistance to lapatinib + trastuzumab in vitro. Treatment with FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors reversed these changes and overcame resistance to lapatinib + trastuzumab. High expression of FGFR1 correlated with a statistically shorter progression-free survival in patients with HER2+ early breast cancer treated with adjuvant trastuzumab. Finally, FGFR1 and/or FGF3 gene amplification correlated with a lower pathologic complete response in patients with HER2+ early breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy.Conclusions: Amplification of FGFR signaling promotes resistance to HER2 inhibition, which can be diminished by the combination of HER2 and FGFR inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res; 23(15); 4323–34. ©2017 AACR.

Purpose: The prognostic and predictive relevance of epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2) and topoisomerase II α (TOP2A) have long been a matter of debate. However, the correlation of DNA amplification, RNA levels, and protein expression and their prognostic role and association with anthracycline responses in node-negative breast cancer have not yet been evaluated.Experimental Design: We first analyzed TOP2A and ERBB2 at the levels of gene amplification, and RNA and protein expression, and studied their correlations. Additionally, TOP2A and ERBB2 were analyzed in 782 node-negative breast carcinomas in patients who did not receive systemic therapy and in 80 patients treated with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) prior to surgery.Results: TOP2A gene amplification did not correlate with protein expression (P = 0.283) and showed an association with gene expression with only borderline significance (P = 0.047). By contrast, TOP2A RNA levels correlated with protein expression (P < 0.001). TOP2A gene expression was significantly associated with the metastasis-free interval (MFI; P < 0.001) and was associated with complete remission in patients treated with EC (P = 0.002). In contrast to TOP2A, ERBB2 gene amplification correlated with RNA level (P < 0.001) and protein expression (P < 0.001). ERBB2 gene expression was associated with the MFI only in estrogen receptor–positive carcinomas, whereas ERBB2 protein expression (P = 0.032) was associated with MFI in the entire cohort.Conclusions: Overall, our study indicates that the TOP2A RNA level is a good prognostic marker and is also associated with a favorable response to anthracyclin-based therapy. By contrast, ESR1 was associated with poorer responses to anthracyclin-based therapy, whereas the association with ERBB2 RNA was not significant. Clin Cancer Res; 16(8); 2391–401. ©2010 AACR.

Supplementary Data from Role of Tumor-Infiltrating B Cells in Clinical Outcome of Patients with Melanoma Treated With Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib

Supplementary Data from ERBB2 and TOP2A in Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis of Gene Amplification, RNA Levels, and Protein Expression and Their Influence on Prognosis and Prediction

BackgroundThe randomized phase 3 COMBI-i trial did not meet its primary endpoint of improved progression-free survival (PFS) with spartalizumab plus dabrafenib and trametinib (sparta-DabTram) vs placebo plus dabrafenib and trametinib (placebo-DabTram) in the overall population of patients with unresectable/metastatic BRAF V600-mutant melanoma. This prespecified exploratory biomarker analysis was performed to identify subgroups that may derive greater treatment benefit from sparta-DabTram.MethodsIn COMBI-i (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02967692), 532 patients received spartalizumab 400 mg intravenously every 4 weeks plus dabrafenib 150 mg orally two times daily and trametinib 2 mg orally one time daily or placebo-DabTram. Baseline/on-treatment pharmacodynamic markers were assessed via flow cytometry-based immunophenotyping and plasma cytokine profiling. Baseline programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status and T-cell phenotype were assessed via immunohistochemistry; BRAF V600 mutation type, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) via DNA sequencing; gene expression signatures via RNA sequencing; and CD4+/CD8+ T-cell ratio via immunophenotyping.ResultsExtensive biomarker analyses were possible in approximately 64% to 90% of the intention-to-treat population, depending on sample availability and assay. Subgroups based on PD-L1 status/TMB or T-cell inflammation did not show significant differences in PFS benefit with sparta-DabTram vs placebo-DabTram, although T-cell inflammation was prognostic across treatment arms. Subgroups defined by BRAF V600K mutation (HR 0.45 (95% CI 0.21 to 0.99)), detectable ctDNA shedding (HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.96)), or CD4+/CD8+ ratio above median (HR 0.58 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.84)) derived greater PFS benefit with sparta-DabTram vs placebo-DabTram. In a multivariate analysis, ctDNA emerged as strongly prognostic (p=0.007), while its predictive trend did not reach significance; in contrast, CD4+/CD8+ ratio was strongly predictive (interaction p=0.0131).ConclusionsThese results support the feasibility of large-scale comprehensive biomarker analyses in the context of a global phase 3 study. T-cell inflammation was prognostic but not predictive of sparta-DabTram benefit, as patients with high T-cell inflammation already benefit from targeted therapy alone. Baseline ctDNA shedding also emerged as a strong independent prognostic variable, with predictive trends consistent with established measures of disease burden such as lactate dehydrogenase levels. CD4+/CD8+ T-cell ratio was significantly predictive of PFS benefit with sparta-DabTram but requires further validation as a biomarker in melanoma. Taken together with previous observations, further study of checkpoint inhibitor plus targeted therapy combination in patients with higher disease burden may be warranted.Trial registration numberNCT02967692.

PURPOSEPreclinical data suggest the combination of an anti–programmed death receptor 1 antibody plus dabrafenib and trametinib to have superior antitumor activity compared with dabrafenib plus trametinib alone. These observations are supported by translational evidence suggesting that immune checkpoint inhibitors plus targeted therapy may improve treatment outcomes in patients with BRAF V600–mutant metastatic melanoma. COMBI-i is a phase III trial evaluating spartalizumab, an anti–programmed death receptor 1 antibody, in combination with dabrafenib and trametinib (sparta-DabTram), versus placebo plus dabrafenib and trametinib (placebo-DabTram) in patients with BRAF V600–mutant unresectable or metastatic melanoma.METHODSPatients received spartalizumab 400 mg intravenously every 4 weeks plus dabrafenib 150 mg orally twice daily and trametinib 2 mg orally once daily or placebo-DabTram. Participants were age ≥ 18 years with unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600–mutant melanoma. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Overall survival was a key secondary end point (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02967692 ).RESULTSAt data cutoff (July 1, 2020), the median progression-free survival was 16.2 months (95% CI, 12.7 to 23.9 months) in the sparta-DabTram arm versus 12.0 months (95% CI, 10.2 to 15.4 months) in the placebo-DabTram arm (hazard ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.66 to 1.03]; P = .042 [one-sided; nonsignificant]). The objective response rates were 69% (183 of 267 patients) versus 64% (170 of 265 patients), respectively. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 55% (146 of 267) of patients in the sparta-DabTram arm and 33% (88 of 264) in the placebo-DabTram arm.CONCLUSIONThe study did not meet its primary end point; broad first-line use of sparta-DabTram is not supported by these results. Further biomarker-driven investigation may identify patient subpopulations who could benefit from checkpoint inhibitor plus targeted therapy combinations.

Purpose: The influence of the transcriptional and immunologic context of mutations on therapeutic outcomes with targeted therapy in cancer has not been well defined. BRAF V600E–mutant (BM) colorectal cancer comprises two main transcriptional subtypes, BM1 and BM2. We sought to determine the impact of BM subtype, as well as distinct biological features of those subtypes, on response to BRAF/MEK/EGFR inhibition in patients with colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods: Paired fresh tumor biopsies were acquired at baseline and on day 15 of treatment from all consenting patients with BM colorectal cancer enrolled in a phase II clinical trial of dabrafenib, trametinib, and panitumumab. For each sample, BM subtype, cell cycle, and immune gene signature expression were determined using RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), and a Cox proportional hazards model was applied to determine association with progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Confirmed response rates, median PFS, and median overall survival (OS) were higher in BM1 subtype patients compared with BM2 subtype patients. Evaluation of immune contexture identified greater immune reactivity in BM1, whereas cell-cycle signatures were more highly expressed in BM2. A multivariate model of PFS incorporating BM subtype plus immune and cell-cycle signatures revealed that BM subtype encompasses the majority of the effect. Conclusions: BM subtype is significantly associated with the outcome of combination dabrafenib, trametinib, and panitumumab therapy and may serve as a standalone predictive biomarker beyond mutational status. Our findings support a more nuanced approach to targeted therapeutic decisions that incorporates assessment of transcriptional context.

BACKGROUND. The prognostic and predictive value of the two nonluminal (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]‐enriched and basal‐like) subtypes within advanced hormone receptor‐positive (HR+) breast cancer is currently unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This study retrospectively analyzed 261 tumors (80.7% primary; 19.3% metastatic) from the BOLERO‐2 study; BOLERO‐2 randomized 724 patients with advanced HR+/HER2‐negative breast cancer to everolimus plus exemestane or placebo plus exemestane. Tumors were classified using a PAM50 subtype predictor. Multivariable Cox regression analyses tested the independent prognostic significance of PAM50, and associations between PAM50 subtypes and treatment upon progression‐free survival (PFS) were evaluated. RESULTS. Subtype distribution was 46.7% luminal A (n = 122), 21.5% HER2‐enriched (n = 56), 15.7% luminal B (n = 41), 14.2% normal‐like (n = 37), and 1.9% basal‐like (n = 5); HER2‐enriched subtypes were more common in metastatic versus primary tumors (32.0% vs. 18.7%; p = .038). Median PFS differences between luminal and nonluminal (6.7 vs. 5.2 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47–0.94; p = .020) and HER2‐enriched and non‐HER2‐enriched subtypes (5.2 vs. 6.2 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.07–2.19; p = .019) were significant. Everolimus plus exemestane significantly improved median PFS versus placebo plus exemestane among patients with HER2‐enriched tumors (5.8 vs. 4.1 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.26–0.90; p = .034); however, the association between HER2‐enriched tumors and everolimus benefit was nonsignificant (p = .433). CONCLUSION. The HER2‐enriched subtype was identified in a substantial proportion of advanced HR+/HER2‐negative breast tumors, and was a consistent biomarker of poor prognosis. Tailored therapies are therefore needed for HER2‐enriched tumors in the advanced HR+/HER2‐negative breast cancer setting. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE. Using 261 tumor samples from the BOLERO‐2 phase III clinical trial, this study shows that a substantial proportion (20%–30%) of hormone receptor‐positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐negative advanced breast cancers do not have a luminal A or B gene expression profile. This group of patients with nonluminal disease has a poor survival outcome regardless of the addition of everolimus to exemestane. This is the second study that confirms the prognostic value of this biomarker. Overall, these findings indicate a necessity to design novel clinical trials targeting nonluminal disease within HR+/HER2‐negative breast cancer.

Purpose: Although patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma can experience long-term survival with BRAF- and MEK-targeted agents or immune checkpoint inhibitors over 5 years, resistance develops in most patients. There is a distinct lack of pretherapeutic biomarkers to identify which patients are likely to benefit from each therapy type. Most research has focused on the predictive role of T cells in antitumor responses as opposed to B cells. Patients and Methods: We conducted prespecified exploratory biomarker analysis using gene expression profiling and digital pathology in 146 patients with previously untreated BRAF V600–mutant metastatic melanoma from the randomized, phase III COMBI-v trial and treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib who had available tumor specimens from screening. Results: Baseline cell-cycle gene expression signature was associated with progression-free survival (P = 0.007). Patients with high T-cell/low B-cell gene signatures had improved median overall survival (not reached [95% confidence interval (CI), 33.8 months–not reached]) compared with patients with high T-cell/high B-cell signatures (19.1 months; 95% CI, 13.4–38.6 months). Patients with high B-cell signatures had high B-cell infiltration into the tumor compartment, corresponding with decreased MAPK activity and increased expression of immunosuppressive markers. Conclusions: B cells may serve as a potential biomarker to predict clinical outcome in patients with advanced melanoma treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib. As separate studies have shown an opposite effect for B-cell levels and response to immunotherapy, B cells may serve as a potential biomarker to facilitate treatment selection. Further validation in a larger patient cohort is needed.

Summary Background Adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib reduced the risk of relapse versus placebo in patients with resected, BRAFV600-mutant, stage III melanoma in the phase 3 COMBI-AD trial. This prespecified exploratory biomarker analysis aimed to evaluate potential prognostic or predictive factors and mechanisms of resistance to adjuvant targeted therapy. Methods COMBI-AD is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial comparing dabrafenib 150 mg orally twice daily plus trametinib 2 mg orally once daily versus two matched placebos. Study participants were at least 18 years of age and underwent complete resection of stage IIIA (lymph node metastases >1 mm), IIIB, or IIIC cutaneous melanoma, per American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition criteria, with a BRAFV600E or BRAFV600K mutation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the two treatment groups by an interactive voice response system, stratified by mutation type and disease stage. Patients, physicians, and the investigators who analysed data were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was relapse-free survival, defined as the time from randomisation to disease recurrence or death from any cause. Biomarker assessment was a prespecified exploratory outcome of the trial. We assessed intrinsic tumour genomic features by use of next-generation DNA sequencing and characteristics of the tumour microenvironment by use of a NanoString RNA assay, which might provide prognostic and predictive information. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01682083 , and is ongoing but no longer recruiting participants. Findings Between Jan 31, 2013, and Dec 11, 2014, 870 patients were enrolled in the trial. Median follow-up at data cutoff (April 30, 2018) was 44 months (IQR 38–49) in the dabrafenib plus trametinib group and 42 months (21–49) in the placebo group. Intrinsic tumour genomic features were assessed in 368 patients (DNA sequencing set) and tumour microenvironment characteristics were assessed in 507 patients (NanoString biomarker set). MAPK pathway genomic alterations at baseline did not affect treatment benefit or clinical outcome. An IFNγ gene expression signature higher than the median was prognostic for prolonged relapse-free survival in both treatment groups. Tumour mutational burden was independently prognostic for relapse-free survival in the placebo group (high TMB, top third; hazard ratio [HR] 0·56, 95% CI 0·37–0·85, p=0·0056), but not in the dabrafenib plus trametinib group (0·83, 95% CI 0·53–1·32, p=0·44). Patients with tumour mutational burden in the lower two terciles seem to derive a substantial long-term relapse-free survival benefit from targeted therapy (HR [versus placebo] 0·49, 95% CI 0·35–0·68, p Interpretation Tumour mutational burden alone or in combination with IFNγ gene expression signature or other markers for an adaptive immune response might be of relevance for identifying patients with stage III melanoma who might derive clinical benefit from targeted therapy. Further validation in prospective clinical trials is warranted. Funding Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

Background: HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC) comprises all the four PAM50 molecular subtypes. Among these, the HER2-Enriched (HER2-E) appear to be associated with higher pathological complete response (pCR) rates following anti-HER2-based regimens. Here, we present a meta-analysis to validate the association of the HER2-E subtype with pCR following anti-HER2-based neoadjuvant treatments with or without chemotherapy (CT). Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in February 2019. The primary objective was to compare the association between HER2-E subtype (versus others) and pCR. Selected secondary objectives were to compare the association between 1) HER2-E subtype and pCR in CT-free studies, 2) HER2-E subtype within hormone receptor (HR)-negative and HR+ disease and 3) HR-negative disease (versus HR+) and pCR in all patients and within HER2-E subtype. A random-effect model was applied. The Higgins��� I2 was used to quantify heterogeneity. Results: Sixteen studies were included, 5 of which tested CT-free regimens. HER2-E subtype was significantly associated with pCR in all patients (odds ratio [OR] = 3.50, p < 0.001, I2 = 33%), in HR+ (OR = 3.61, p < 0.001, I2 = 1%) and HR-negative tumors (OR = 2.28, p = 0.01, I2 = 47%). In CT-free studies, HER2-E subtype was associated with pCR in all patients (OR = 5.52, p < 0.001, I2 = 0%) and in HR + disease (OR = 4.08, p = 0.001, I2 = 0%). HR-negative status was significantly associated with pCR compared to HR + status in all patients (OR = 2.41, p < 0.001, I2 = 30%) and within the HER2-E subtype (OR = 1.76, p < 0.001, I2 = 0%). Conclusions: The HER2-E biomarker identifies patients with a higher likelihood of achieving a pCR following neoadjuvant anti-HER2-based therapy beyond HR status and CT use. Future trial designs to escalate or de-escalate systemic therapy in HER2+ disease should consider this genomic biomarker.

10034 Background: Spartalizumab + dabrafenib + trametinib has previously shown a high response rate of 78% (28 of 36 pts), with a complete response (CR) rate of 42%. A correlative analysis of gene expression signatures (GES)/pathways using whole-transcriptome RNA-seq data from tissue showed that pts with a CR had significantly lower expression levels of immunosuppressive factors in the tumor microenvironment (TME) at baseline (BL). Here we analyze BL peripheral blood markers in the same cohort of pts to assess whether liquid markers can also predict response and clinical outcome to spartalizumab + dabrafenib + trametinib. Methods: The Phase III COMBI-i study (NCT02967692) is evaluating spartalizumab + dabrafenib + trametinib in pts with previously untreated BRAF V600–mutant unresectable or metastatic melanoma. In parts 1 (safety run-in; n = 9) and 2 (biomarker cohort; n = 27), blood and tissue samples were collected at BL, on treatment after 2-3 wk and 8-12 wk, and at disease progression. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and other blood-based markers (including cytokine profiling [n = 45] and blood RNA-seq [114 signatures]) were assessed in all 36 pts. Pts were divided into 2 groups of 24 and 12 pts based on progression-free survival (PFS) of > 1 or < 1 y. Results: In addition to LDH, previously described blood markers such as neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and plasma IL-8 were identified among other neutrophil and immunosuppressive features as top candidates associated with PFS > 1 y. Low plasma IL-8 levels were also associated with CR, and multivariate models suggested that IL-8 may add independent predictive value to LDH and NLR for PFS > 1 y and CR. Pts with high IL-8 levels in the circulation were characterized by high neutrophil chemokine signaling (ρ = 0.553) and high neutrophil markers (ρ = 0.466) in the tumor as measured by RNA-seq GES levels. We observed a decrease in plasma IL-8 levels from BL upon treatment with spartalizumab + dabrafenib + trametinib. Conclusions: Our peripheral blood marker analysis confirmed recent findings from tissue samples that intratumoral immunosuppressive features may preclude a CR and are associated with poor outcomes. High BL plasma IL-8 levels may be associated with an immunosuppressive TME. Further validation is warranted; the randomized placebo-controlled part 3 of COMBI-i is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02967692.

Immune and targeted therapies achieve long-term survival in metastatic melanoma; however, new treatment strategies are needed to improve patients’ outcomes1,2. We report on the efficacy, safety and biomarker analysis from the single-arm safety run-in (part 1; n = 9) and biomarker (part 2; n = 27) cohorts of the randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 COMBI-i trial (NCT02967692) of the anti-PD-1 antibody spartalizumab, in combination with the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib and MEK inhibitor trametinib. Patients (n = 36) had previously untreated BRAF V600-mutant unresectable or metastatic melanoma. In part 1, the recommended phase 3 regimen was identified based on the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; primary endpoint): 400 mg of spartalizumab every 4 weeks plus 150 mg of dabrafenib twice daily plus 2 mg of trametinib once daily. Part 2 characterized changes in PD-L1 levels and CD8+ cells following treatment (primary endpoint), and analyzed additional biomarkers. Assessments of efficacy and safety were key secondary endpoints (median follow-up, 24.3 months). Spartalizumab plus dabrafenib and trametinib led to an objective response rate (ORR) of 78%, including 44% complete responses (CRs). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were experienced by 72% of patients. All patients had temporary dose modifications, and 17% permanently discontinued all three study drugs due to TRAEs. Early progression-free survival (PFS) events were associated with low tumor mutational burden/T cell–inflamed gene expression signature (GES) or high immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) GES levels at baseline; an immunosuppressive TME may also preclude CR. Overall, the efficacy, safety and on-treatment biomarker modulations associated with spartalizumab plus dabrafenib and trametinib are promising, and biomarkers that may predict long-term benefit were identified. Clinical activity and biomarker analysis from the COMBI-i trial evaluating PD-1, BRAF and MEK inhibition in patients with metastatic melanoma demonstrate high response rates and uncover molecular correlates of long-term treatment benefit.

Background Several studies have demonstrated the antitumor activity of first-generation somatostatin analogs (SSAs), primarily targeting somatostatin receptor (sstr) subtypes 2 and 5, in neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Pasireotide, a second-generation SSA, targets multiple sstr subtypes. We compared the efficacy and safety of pasireotide plus everolimus to everolimus alone in patients with advanced, well-differentiated, progressive pancreatic NET. Patients and methods Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to receive a combination of everolimus (10 mg/day, orally) and pasireotide long-acting release (60 mg/28 days, intramuscularly) or everolimus alone (10 mg/day, orally); stratified by prior SSA use, and baseline serum chromogranin A and neuron-specific enolase. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, and safety. Biomarker response was evaluated in an exploratory analysis. Results Of 160 patients enrolled, 79 were randomized to the combination arm and 81 to the everolimus arm. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were similar between the treatment arms. No significant difference was observed in PFS: 16.8 months in combination arm versus 16.6 months in everolimus arm (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.64–1.54). Partial responses were observed in 20.3% versus 6.2% of patients in combination arm versus everolimus arm; however, overall disease control rate was similar (77.2% versus 82.7%, respectively). No significant improvement was observed in median overall survival. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of both the drugs; grade 3 or 4 fasting hyperglycemia was seen in 37% versus 11% of patients, respectively. Conclusions The addition of pasireotide to everolimus was not associated with the improvement in PFS compared with everolimus alone in this study. Further studies to delineate mechanisms by which SSAs slow tumor growth in NET are warranted.

Adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib reduced the risk of relapse versus placebo in patients with resected, BRAFCOMBI-AD is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial comparing dabrafenib 150 mg orally twice daily plus trametinib 2 mg orally once daily versus two matched placebos. Study participants were at least 18 years of age and underwent complete resection of stage IIIA (lymph node metastases1 mm), IIIB, or IIIC cutaneous melanoma, per American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition criteria, with a BRAFBetween Jan 31, 2013, and Dec 11, 2014, 870 patients were enrolled in the trial. Median follow-up at data cutoff (April 30, 2018) was 44 months (IQR 38-49) in the dabrafenib plus trametinib group and 42 months (21-49) in the placebo group. Intrinsic tumour genomic features were assessed in 368 patients (DNA sequencing set) and tumour microenvironment characteristics were assessed in 507 patients (NanoString biomarker set). MAPK pathway genomic alterations at baseline did not affect treatment benefit or clinical outcome. An IFNγ gene expression signature higher than the median was prognostic for prolonged relapse-free survival in both treatment groups. Tumour mutational burden was independently prognostic for relapse-free survival in the placebo group (high TMB, top third; hazard ratio [HR] 0·56, 95% CI 0·37-0·85, p=0·0056), but not in the dabrafenib plus trametinib group (0·83, 95% CI 0·53-1·32, p=0·44). Patients with tumour mutational burden in the lower two terciles seem to derive a substantial long-term relapse-free survival benefit from targeted therapy (HR [versus placebo] 0·49, 95% CI 0·35-0·68, p0·0001). However, patients with high tumour mutational burden seem to have a less pronounced benefit with targeted therapy (HR [versus placebo] 0·75, 95% CI 0·44-1·26, p=0·27), especially if they had an IFNγ signature lower than the median (HR 0·88 [95% CI 0·40-1·93], p=0·74).Tumour mutational burden alone or in combination with IFNγ gene expression signature or other markers for an adaptive immune response might be of relevance for identifying patients with stage III melanoma who might derive clinical benefit from targeted therapy. Further validation in prospective clinical trials is warranted.Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

9510 Background: There are no validated blood-based biomarkers to monitor efficacy in pts with advanced melanoma. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is an established prognostic factor; however, it is not normally used to inform treatment decisions. ctDNA at baseline (BL) is associated with a poor prognosis in pts treated with BRAF inhibitors, but no studies have examined the association between serial changes in ctDNA and survival after BRAF and/or MEK inhibitor therapy. Methods: We measured BRAF V600E/K ctDNA at BL and wk 4 in plasma samples from a pooled population of pts with unresectable or metastatic melanoma treated with D or D+T in the phase 3 COMBI-d trial (NCT01584648). We used mutation-specific droplet digital PCR assays; ctDNA results were categorized as positive/negative (pos/neg) using an analytically validated detection threshold of 0.25 copies/mL. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed in all pts and by BL LDH level (> or < upper limit of normal). Results: BL ctDNA was detectable in 320/345 pts (92.7%) and was not associated with survival. Nearly all pts had a considerable drop in ctDNA after 4 wks of therapy; 201 pts had paired samples (BL and wk 4) and detectable ctDNA at BL. In 80/201 pts (40%) whose ctDNA changed from pos at BL to neg at wk 4, PFS and OS were prolonged vs in 121/201 (60%) whose ctDNA remained pos (median PFS, 12.9 [95% CI, 9.2-20.2] mo vs 7.1 [5.5-8.9] mo; HR, 0.55 [0.39-0.76]; P = .0003; median OS, 28.2 [20.5-48.8] mo vs 14.6 [11.8-18.7] mo; HR, 0.56 [0.40-0.79]; P = .0007). Undetectable ctDNA at wk 4 was associated with prolonged PFS and OS, especially in pts with high BL LDH (Table). Conclusions: Particularly in pts with high LDH, on-treatment ctDNA monitoring may be helpful for early identification of pts likely to benefit from D or D+T. All ctDNA Samples at Wk 4. Clinical trial information: NCT01584648. [Table: see text]

9515 Background: Although pts with both low tumor mutation burden (TMB) and T-cell–inflamed gene expression profiles (TI-GEPs) usually have poor outcomes with anti–PD-1 therapy, an analysis in the adjuvant melanoma setting suggested that these pts benefited from adjuvant D+T therapy. Here we analyze TMB/TI-GEPs and other biomarkers in pts receiving a combination of anti–PD-1 and D+T therapy. Methods: The phase 3 COMBI-i study (NCT02967692) is evaluating S in combination with D+T in previously untreated pts with BRAF V600–mutant unresectable/metastatic melanoma. In the safety run-in (part [p] 1) and biomarker (p2) cohorts, blood/tissue samples were collected at baseline (BL), after 2-3 and 8-12 wk of treatment, and at disease progression. TMB/circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and TI-GEPs were examined by targeted DNA-seq and RNA-seq, respectively. Results: At data cutoff, 6 of 22 pts with DNA- and RNA-seq data available had a PFS event. At BL, these pts had low TMB, low TI-GEPs (4 of 6), or high levels of immunosuppressive TME signatures (eg, fibroblast, M2 macrophages) vs pts without a PFS event. Elevated BL ctDNA was significantly associated with PFS events ( P< .001). Pts with a complete response (CR) on S+D+T had significantly lower levels of BL immunosuppressive TME signatures (eg, M2 macrophages; P< .01) than pts without a CR. We observed a consistent increase in TI-GEPs and decrease in MAPK pathway activity score (MPAS) from BL to biopsy at 2-3 wk in all pts regardless of subsequent progression. Pts with a PFS event and available longitudinal biomarker data were characterized by a subsequent decrease in TI-GEPs and an increase in MPAS per the 8- to 12- wk biopsy sample. Conclusions: These results suggest that S+D+T had an early impact on tumor cells and the TME, potentially promoting antitumor activity. The majority of PFS events occurred in the TMB-low/TI-GEP-low subgroup. An immunosuppressive TME might preclude early CRs. The predictive implications of coupling TMB/GEP subgroups with other TME marker subgroups need further validation. The randomized placebo-controlled p3 of COMBI-i is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02967692.

BackgroundMelanoma lacks validated blood-based biomarkers for monitoring and predicting treatment efficacy. Cell-free circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is a promising biomarker; however, various detection methods have been used, and, to date, no large studies have examined the association between serial changes in ctDNA and survival after BRAF, MEK, or BRAF plus MEK inhibitor therapy. We aimed to evaluate whether baseline ctDNA concentrations and kinetics could predict survival outcomes.MethodsIn this clinical validation study, we used analytically validated droplet digital PCR assays to measure BRAFV600-mutant ctDNA in pretreatment and on-treatment plasma samples from patients aged 18 years or older enrolled in two clinical trials. COMBI-d (NCT01584648) was a double-blind, randomised phase 3 study of dabrafenib plus trametinib versus dabrafenib plus placebo in previously untreated patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma. Patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. COMBI-MB (NCT02039947) was an open-label, non-randomised, phase 2 study evaluating dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive metastatic melanoma and brain metastases. Patients in cohort A of COMBI-MB had asymptomatic brain metastases, no previous local brain-directed therapy, and an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. Biomarker analysis was a prespecified exploratory endpoint in both trials and performed in the intention-to-treat populations in COMBI-d and COMBI-MB. We investigated the association between mutant copy number (baseline or week 4 or zero conversion status) and efficacy endpoints (progression-free survival, overall survival, and best overall response). We used Cox models, Kaplan-Meier plots, and log-rank tests to explore the association of pretreatment ctDNA concentrations with progression-free survival and overall survival. The effect of additional prognostic variables such as lactate dehydrogenase was also investigated in addition to the mutant copy number.FindingsIn COMBI-d, pretreatment plasma samples were available from 345 (82%) of 423 patients and on-treatment (week 4) plasma samples were available from 224 (53%) of 423 patients. In cohort A of COMBI-MB, pretreatment and on-treatment samples were available from 38 (50%) of 76 patients with intracranial and extracranial metastatic melanoma. ctDNA was detected in pretreatment samples from 320 (93%) of 345 patients (COMBI-d) and 34 (89%) of 38 patients (COMBI-MB). When assessed as a continuous variable, elevated baseline BRAFV600 mutation-positive ctDNA concentration was associated with worse overall survival outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 1·13 [95% CI 1·09-1·18], p

Although BRAF inhibitor monotherapy yields response rates >50% in BRAFV600-mutant melanoma, only approximately 5% of patients with BRAFV600E colorectal cancer respond. Preclinical studies suggest that the lack of efficacy in BRAFV600E colorectal cancer is due to adaptive feedback reactivation of MAPK signaling, often mediated by EGFR. This clinical trial evaluated BRAF and EGFR inhibition with dabrafenib (D) + panitumumab (P) ± MEK inhibition with trametinib (T) to achieve greater MAPK suppression and improved efficacy in 142 patients with BRAFV600E colorectal cancer. Confirmed response rates for D+P, D+T+P, and T+P were 10%, 21%, and 0%, respectively. Pharmacodynamic analysis of paired pretreatment and on-treatment biopsies found that efficacy of D+T+P correlated with increased MAPK suppression. Serial cell-free DNA analysis revealed additional correlates of response and emergence of KRAS and NRAS mutations on disease progression. Thus, targeting adaptive feedback pathways in BRAFV600E colorectal cancer can improve efficacy, but MAPK reactivation remains an important primary and acquired resistance mechanism. Significance: This trial demonstrates that combined BRAF + EGFR + MEK inhibition is tolerable, with promising activity in patients with BRAFV600E colorectal cancer. Our findings highlight the MAPK pathway as a critical target in BRAFV600E colorectal cancer and the need to optimize strategies inhibiting this pathway to overcome both primary and acquired resistance. Cancer Discov; 8(4); 428–43. ©2018 AACR. See related commentary by Janku, p. 389. See related article by Hazar-Rethinam et al., p. 417. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 371

9574Background: In the COMBI-AD trial, adjuvant D + T resulted in a significant relapse-free survival benefit (HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.39-0.58]; P < .001) vs pbo in pts with resected stage III BRAF V60...

Background The presence of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is associated with increased pathologic complete response (pCR) and improved outcomes in HER2-positive early-breast cancer (BC) treated with anti-HER2-based chemotherapy. In the absence of chemotherapy, the association of TILs with pCR following anti-HER2 therapy-only is largely unknown. Patients and methods The PAMELA neoadjuvant trial treated 151 women with HER2-positive BC with lapatinib and trastuzumab [and hormonal therapy if hormone receptor (HR)-positive] for 18 weeks. Percentage of TILs and tumor cellularity were determined at baseline (N = 148) and at day 15 (D15) of treatment (N = 134). Associations of TILs and tumor cellularity with pCR in the breast were evaluated. A combined score based on tumor cellularity and TILs (CelTIL) measured at D15 was derived in PAMELA, and validated in D15 samples from 65 patients with HER2-positive disease recruited in the LPT109096 neoadjuvant trial, where anti-HER2 therapy-only was administer for 2 weeks, then standard chemotherapy was added for 24 weeks. Results In PAMELA, baseline and D15 TILs were significantly associated with pCR in univariate analysis. In multivariable analysis, D15 TILs, but not baseline TILs, were significantly associated with pCR. At D15, TILs and tumor cellularity were found independently associated with pCR. A combined score (CelTIL) taking into account both variables was derived. CelTIL at D15 as a continuous variable was significantly associated with pCR, and patients with CelTIL-low and CelTIL-high scores had a pCR rate of 0% and 33%, respectively. In LPT109096, CelTIL at D15 was found associated with pCR both as a continuous variable and as group categories using a pre-defined cut-off (75.0% versus 33.3%). Conclusions On-treatment TILs, but not baseline TILs, are independently associated with response following anti-HER2 therapy-only. A combined score of TILs and tumor cellularity measured at D15 provides independent predictive information upon completion of neoadjuvant anti-HER2-based therapy. Clinical trial number NCT01973660.

Background: Patients (pts) with breast cancer who do not achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) have a poor prognosis and might be candidates for post-neoadjuvant clinical trials investigating novel agents. The CPS-EG score (Mittendorf et al. JCO 2011) – a combination of clinical/pathological parameters - is currently used as criterion for selecting patients with highest risk of recurrence after NACT. Here, we examined whether the gene expression test EndoPredict (EP) performed on surgical specimen after NACT provides independent prognostic information for predicting the likelihood of recurrence in breast cancer patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative (ER+/HER2-) disease. Methods:The molecular EP score was determined by qRT-PCR in 76 available surgical specimen classified as ER+/HER2- from breast cancer pts with residual disease after NACT participating in the neoadjuvant GeparTrio trial. The pre-specified clinical/molecular hybrid score EPclin was determined using ypT and ypN after NACT as clinical variables. Patients were classified as having low or high risk according to pre-defined cut-off values. CPS-EG score was calculated based on stage before and after NACT and pretreatment grade and ER status. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Associations were assessed with uni- and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. The unbiased c-index was estimated for common clinical/pathological parameters and EP/EPclin scores. Results: Among the 76 ER+/HER2- breast cancer pts evaluated, EP classified 50% of all pts (n=38) as low risk. EP high-risk patients had a significantly increased risk for relapse compared to the low-risk group (continuous EP HR 1.14 [95% CI 1.05-1.27] p-value 0.02; log-rank p=0.015). Multivariable Cox regression and unbiased c-index estimates (using EP and CPS-EG score as continuous variable) showed that the EP-score (HR 1.15 [95% CI 1.03-1.29 p=0.014] and CPS-EG (HR 1.51 [95% CI 1.07-2.13] p=0.019) provide independent prognostic information. Using the composite EPclin score 13 pts (17%) were classified as being EPclin low. The risk of relapse was significantly higher for EPclin high compared to low (continuous EPclin HR 1.78 [95% CI 1.29-2.46] p Conclusions: Our study shows that EPclin performed on surgical specimen of ER+/HER2- pts after NACT is an independent predictor of recurrence in pts not achieving a pCR after NACT. EP/EPclin low risk patients are probably sufficiently treated with (neo-)adjuvant chemo-endocrine treatment alone, whereas EP(clin) high risk patients have an increased risk of recurrence, despite receiving standard (neo-)adjuvant chemo-endocrine therapy. The identification of molecular luminal high-risk patients could help to identify high risk patients as candidates for novel drug-based approaches in addition to endocrine therapy to overcome resistance in post-neoadjuvant trials. Citation Format: Sibylle Loibl, Jan C Brase, Stephan Gade, Jens Huober, Kristin Krappmann, Knut Engels, Falko Fend, Berit Maria Pfitzner, Joern Hilfrich, Christoph Thomssen, Hans Juergen Holzhausen, Silvia Darb-Esfahani, Christian Schem, Keyur Mehta, Ralf Kronenwett, Gunter von Minckwitz, Carsten Denkert. Predicting residual risk of recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy- a retrospective analysis of EndoPredict® in the GeparTrio trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-06-12.

Purpose Modulation of immunologic interactions in cancer tissue is a promising therapeutic strategy. To investigate the immunogenicity of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –positive and triple-negative (TN) breast cancers (BCs), we evaluated tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and immunologically relevant genes in the neoadjuvant GeparSixto trial. Patients and Methods GeparSixto investigated the effect of adding carboplatin (Cb) to an anthracycline-plus-taxane combination (PM) on pathologic complete response (pCR). A total of 580 tumors were evaluated before random assignment for stromal TILs and lymphocyte-predominant BC (LPBC). mRNA expression of immune-activating (CXCL9, CCL5, CD8A, CD80, CXCL13, IGKC, CD21) as well as immunosuppressive factors (IDO1, PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA4, FOXP3) was measured in 481 tumors. Results Increased levels of stromal TILs predicted pCR in univariable (P < .001) and multivariable analyses (P < .001). pCR rate was 59.9% in LPBC and 33.8% for non-LPBC (P < .001). pCR rates ≥ 75% were observed in patients with LPBC tumors treated with PMCb, with a significant test for interaction with therapy in the complete (P = .002) and HER2-positive (P = .006), but not the TNBC, cohorts. Hierarchic clustering of mRNA markers revealed three immune subtypes with different pCR rates (P < .001). All 12 immune mRNA markers were predictive for increased pCR. The highest odds ratios (ORs) were observed for PD-L1 (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.34 to 1.86; P < .001) and CCL5 (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.62; P < .001). Conclusion Immunologic factors were highly significant predictors of therapy response in the GeparSixto trial, particularly in patients treated with Cb. After further standardization, they could be included in histopathologic assessment of BC.

Background: Several prognostic multigene tests are available for the management of breast cancer patients, but so far there is little data available directly comparing the classification performance of different breast cancer tests in the same patient cohort. Here, we compared the prognostic performance of two second generation multigene tests in ER+/HER2- early node-positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy. Patients and methods: The EndoPredict (EP) score and two research laboratory-based versions of the PAM50 risk of recurrence (ROR based on subtype [ROR-S] and based on subtype and proliferation [ROR-P]) score were compared in 536 ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients who participated in the GEICAM/ 9906 trial. Patients had either been treated with fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) or with FEC followed by weekly paclitaxel (FEC-P), and endocrine therapy. ROR and EP scores were combined with clinical information to obtain the following hybrid scores as published before: a) ROR-T score (subtype and tumor size), b) ROR-PT score (subtype, proliferation and tumor size) scores, and c) EPclin score (EP Score plus tumor size and nodal status). Each patient was assigned to risk categories according to pre-specified cut-off levels for the scores. The primary endpoint was distant metastasis. Metastasis rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. C-index analysis was used to estimate the performance of the different scores. Results: The PAM50 ROR-S and ROR-P scores, and the EP score were prognostic in patients with ER+/HER2- tumors and consistently identified a low-risk group with a particular good outcome (10 year MFS rate - ROR-S: 81.7%, ROR-P: 82.9% and EP: 89.4%). Combining the molecular signatures with clinical information, improved the prognostic performance of all signatures (10 year MFS rate - ROR-T: 83.4%, ROR-PT: 87.3% and EPclin: 100%). All signatures added prognostic information to common clinical parameters. Among the signatures evaluated only EPclin added a significantly improved prediction of distant metastasis to ROR-T (p < 0.001) and ROR-PT (p < 0.001), which may be due to the feature that EPClin includes a term for node status, but which is not included in any ROR-based model. Conclusions: Our study suggests that PAM50 ROR and EP can be used to reliably predict risk of distant metastasis in node-positive ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. There was no significant difference between the molecular signatures in terms of low risk classification. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P2-11-06.

Background: ER þ/HER2 � breast cancers have a proclivity for late recurrence. A personalised estimate of relapse risk after 5 years of endocrine treatment can improve patient selection for extended hormonal therapy. Methods: A total of 1702 postmenopausal ER þ/HER2 � breast cancer patients from two adjuvant phase III trials (ABCSG6, ABCSG8) treated with 5 years of endocrine therapy participated in this study. The multigene test EndoPredict (EP) and the EPclin score (which combines EP with tumour size and nodal status) were predefined in independent training cohorts. All patients were retrospectively assigned to risk categories based on gene expression and on clinical parameters. The primary end point was distant metastasis (DM). Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used in an early (0–5 years) and late time interval (45 years post diagnosis). Results: EP is a significant, independent, prognostic parameter in the early and late time interval. The expression levels of proliferative and ER signalling genes contribute differentially to the underlying biology of early and late DM. The EPclin stratified 64% of patients at risk after 5 years into a low-risk subgroup with an absolute 1.8% of late DM at 10 years of follow-up. Conclusion: The EP test provides additional prognostic information for the identification of early and late DM beyond what can be achieved by combining the commonly used clinical parameters. The EPclin reliably identified a subgroup of patients who have an excellent long-term prognosis after 5 years of endocrine therapy. The side effects of extended therapy should be weighed against this projected outcome.

Several multigene tests have been developed for breast cancer patients to predict the individual risk of recurrence. Most of the first generation tests rely on proliferation-associated genes and are commonly carried out in central reference laboratories. Here, we describe the development of a second generation multigene assay, the EndoPredict test, a prognostic multigene expression test for estrogen receptor (ER) positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) negative (ER+/HER2−) breast cancer patients. The EndoPredict gene signature was initially established in a large high-throughput microarray-based screening study. The key steps for biomarker identification are discussed in detail, in comparison to the establishment of other multigene signatures. After biomarker selection, genes and algorithms were transferred to a diagnostic platform (reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)) to allow for assaying formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. A comprehensive analytical validation was performed and a prospective proficiency testing study with seven pathological laboratories finally proved that EndoPredict can be reliably used in the decentralized setting. Three independent large clinical validation studies (n = 2,257) demonstrated that EndoPredict offers independent prognostic information beyond current clinicopathological parameters and clinical guidelines. The review article summarizes several important steps that should be considered for the development process of a second generation multigene test and offers a means for transferring a microarray signature from the research laboratory to clinical practice.

The outcome of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is critically determined by metastatic spread: About 30–50% of early-stage NSCLC patients encounter tumour recurrence within 5 years after surgery. A biomarker-driven stratification of early-stage lung cancer with a high risk of recurrence may improve therapy management and patient care. The aim of this study was to identify microRNAs (miRNAs) in serum of patients associated with early relapse in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Serum samples were collected from 204 patients before surgery. miRNA screening was done using qRT-PCR based low-density arrays (664 miRNAs) comparing adenocarcinoma patients ( n =40) with and without recurrence 24 months after surgery. Selected miRNAs associated with disease recurrence were validated in an independent patient cohort ( n =114). miRNAs were also measured in advanced adenocarcinoma patients ( n =29), and individuals with benign pulmonary diagnosis ( n =21). Circulating miR-142-3p ( p =0.005) and miR-29b ( p =0.01) were identified in the screening and confirmed in the validation cohort to be increased in sera of early-stage adenocarcinoma patients suffering from recurrence within 24 months. Elevated miRNA levels were exclusively observed in the group of high-risk patient diagnosed for operable adenocarcinoma compared with benign diagnosis or advanced tumour disease. The differentiation between pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients with low and high risk for recurrence was improved by accounting for both miR-142-3p levels and tumour stage ( p =0.007; AUC=0.78). In conclusion, circulating miR-142-3p was found to be associated with a high risk of recurrence in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma patients, and a putative serum marker for risk assessment.

Background: The EndoPredict (EP) score is an RNA-based multigene test to predict the likelihood of distant recurrence in ER-positive (ER+), HER2-negative (HER2−) breast cancer (BC) patients treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy. Results from two large randomized phase III trials involving endocrine therapy only (n > 1700) demonstrated a prognostic power of the EP score beyond what can be achieved by combining the commonly used clinicopathological parameters (Filipits M, 2011). The performance of the EP in chemotherapy-treated patients has not been evaluated yet. Here, we analyzed the EndoPredict score in node-positive ER+/HER2− BC patients from the GEICAM-9906 trial, treated with adjuvant chemotherapy followed by hormonal therapy. Methods: Patients included in this study participated in the GEICAM/9906 trial and were either treated with fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) or with FEC followed by weekly paclitaxel (FEC-P) (Martin M, 2008). ESR1 and ERBB2 gene expression were assessed by qRT-PCR in 800 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor samples out of 1246 patients included in the GEICAM/9906 trial. The EndoPredict score (including eight prognostic genes) was successfully determined in 555 out of the 566 ER+/HER2− patients. Patients were assigned into two categories (high/low), according to the predefined EP cut-off value (Filipits M, 2011). The primary endpoint for the analysis was distant metastasis. Metastasis rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox regression. Interaction between treatment effects and EP was tested as well. Results: Twenty-five percent of patients (n = 141) were classified as EP-low-risk. Kaplan Meier analysis demonstrated that the metastasis-free survival (MFS) was 92% in the EP-low risk vs. 69% in the EP-high-risk group (absolute difference of 23%, HR 4.4 (2.3–8.4) p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that EP is an independent prognostic parameter after adjustment for age, grade, lymph node status and tumor size. EP was found to be prognostic in pre- (p = 0.0002, HR = 5.5 (2.2–13.6)) and postmenopausal (p = 0.0129, HR = 3.3 (1.3–8.2)) BC patients. There were not statistically significant differences in MFS between treatment arms (FEC vs. FEC-P) neither in the high nor in the low-risk groups. Interaction test between chemotherapy arm and EP score was not significant. Conclusions: The results of this study shows that the EndoPredict score is an independent prognostic parameter in node-positive, ER+/HER2− BC patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy followed by hormonal therapy. EndoPredict was not found to be predictive of weekly paclitaxel efficacy. Novel predictive biomarkers are needed to identify the small subset of patients with ER+/HER2− tumors that actually benefit from weekly paclitaxel-containing regimens. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-10-11.

Background: Biomarkers predictive of pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) of breast cancer are urgently needed. Methods: Using a training/validation approach for detection of predictive biomarkers in HER2-negative breast cancer, pre-therapeutic core biopsies from four independent cohorts were investigated: Gene array data were analysed in fresh frozen samples of two cohorts (n=86 and n=55). Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT–PCR) was performed in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples from two neoadjuvant phase III trials (GeparTrio, n=212, and GeparQuattro, n=383). Results: A strong predictive capacity of thymosin beta 15 (TMSB15A) gene expression was evident in both fresh frozen cohorts (P

Background In early estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, the decision to administer chemotherapy is largely based on prognostic criteria. The combined molecular/clinical EndoPredict test (EPclin) has been validated to accurately assess prognosis in this population. In this study, the clinical relevance of EPclin in relation to well-established clinical guidelines is assessed. Patients and methods We assigned risk groups to 1702 ER-positive/HER2-negative postmenopausal women from two large phase III trials treated only with endocrine therapy. Prognosis was assigned according to National Comprehensive Cancer Center Network-, German S3-, St Gallen guidelines and the EPclin. Prognostic groups were compared using the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Results After 10 years, absolute risk reductions (ARR) between the high- and low-risk groups ranged from 6.9% to 11.2% if assigned according to guidelines. It was at 18.7% for EPclin. EPclin reassigned 58%–61% of women classified as high-/intermediate-risk (according to clinical guidelines) to low risk. Women reclassified to low risk showed a 5% rate of distant metastasis at 10 years. Conclusion The EPclin score is able to predict favorable prognosis in a majority of patients that clinical guidelines would assign to intermediate or high risk. EPclin may reduce the indications for chemotherapy in ER-positive postmenopausal women with a limited number of clinical risk factors.

Loss of cell cycle control is a prerequisite for cancer onset and progression. In prostate cancer, increased activity of cell cycle genes has been associated with prognostic parameters such as biochemical relapse and survival. The identification of novel oncogenic and druggable targets in patient subgroups with poor prognosis may help to develop targeted therapy approaches. We analyzed prostate cancer and corresponding benign tissues (n = 98) using microarrays. The comparison of high- and low-grade tumors (Gleason score ≥ 4 + 3 vs. ≤ 3 + 4) revealed 144 differentially expressed genes (p < 0.05). Out of these, 15 genes were involved in the cell cycle process. The gene maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase (MELK) was identified to be highly correlated with cell cycle genes like UBE2C, TOP2A, CCNB2, and AURKB. Increased MELK gene expression in high-risk prostate cancer was validated by qPCR in an independent patient cohort (p < 0.005, n = 79). Immunohistochemistry analysis using a tissue microarray (n = 94) revealed increased MELK protein expression in prostate cancer tissues of high Gleason scores. RNAi-based inhibition of MELK in PC3 and LNCaP cells suggested putative function in chromatin modification, embryonic development and cell migration. The concerted inhibition of MELK and other cell cycle targets by the antibiotic siomycin A strongly impaired cell viability of prostate cancer cells, and may point to a novel therapy approach for a subset of high-risk prostate cancer patients.

The present study aimed to investigate the proteome profiling of surgically treated prostate cancers. Hereto, 2D-DIGE and mass spectrometry were performed for protein identification, and data validation for peroxiredoxin 3 and 4 (PRDX3 and PRDX4) was accomplished by reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA). The Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) method was applied to assess whether the TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion could influence the degree of overexpression of PRDX3 and PRDX4 in prostate cancer. Lastly, we performed an in vitro functional characterization of both PRDX3 and PRDX4 using the classical human prostate cancer cell lines DU145 and LNCaP. Reverse phase protein arrays verified that the overexpression of both PRDX3 and PRDX4 in tumor samples is negatively correlated with the presence of the TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion. Functional characterization of PRDX3 and PRDX4 activity in PCa cell lines suggests a role of these members of the peroxiredoxin family in the pathophysiology of this tumor entity.

Background: The EndoPredict (EP) score is a multigene classifier to predict the likelihood of distant recurrence in ER-positive, HER2−negative breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy. Two large randomized phase III trials involving endocrine therapy only (n > 1700) demonstrated additional prognostic information of the EP score independent from clinicopathological parameters by classifying 49% as low risk. However, the predictive role of the EP is not clear. Therefore, we examined whether the EP Score also predicts sensitivity towards neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER-positive, HER2−negative breast cancer patients. Methods: Four publicly available gene expression data sets (Affymetrix HG-U133A) were retrieved from the gene expression omnibus (GEO) data repository. All analyzed breast cancer patients were treated with anthracycline or taxane/anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Microarray cel files were MAS5 normalized with a global scaling procedure and a target intensity of 500. The analysis was restricted to ER-positive, HER2−negative breast cancer patients according to pre-specified cut-off levels for the respective ESR1/ERBB2 Affymetrix probesets. The EP score was calculated and patients were classified as having low or high risk according to the pre-specified validated cut-off value. Pathological complete response (pCR) — defined as no residual invasive cancer in the breast or lymph nodes — was used as the primary endpoint for the assessment of treatment response. Results: The EP Score was examined in 221 ER-positive, HER2−negative breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Among the 221 patients, 61 tumors (27.6%) were classified as EP-low-risk, whereas 160 tumors (72.4%) were EP-high-risk. Only one of the EP-low-risk tumors achieved a pCR after neoadjuvant therapy, whereas 24 of the 25 pCR events were classified as EP high risk. The sensitivity of the EP score was 96% and the negative predictive value 98% with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.73. Conclusions: The EP Score is a predictor of chemosensitivity in the neoadjuvant setting. The test correctly identified all but one of the patients achieving a pCR suggesting that the benefit of cytotoxic chemotherapy is limited to the EP high risk group. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-06-26.