Search

Abstract Metabolic brain biomarkers have been incorporated in various diagnostic guidelines of neurodegenerative diseases, recently. To improve their diagnostic accuracy a biologically and clinically homogeneous sample is needed for their identification. Alzheimer’s disease-related pattern (ADRP) has been identified previously in cohorts of clinically diagnosed patients with dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease (AD), meaning that its diagnostic accuracy might have been reduced due to common clinical misdiagnosis. In our study, we aimed to identify ADRP in a cohort of AD patients with CSF confirmed diagnosis, validate it in large out-of-sample cohorts and explore its relationship with patients’ clinical status. For identification we analyzed 2-[18F]FDG PET brain scans of 20 AD patients and 20 normal controls (NCs). For validation, 2-[18F]FDG PET scans from 261 individuals with AD, behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia, mild cognitive impairment and NC were analyzed. We identified an ADRP that is characterized by relatively reduced metabolic activity in temporoparietal cortices, posterior cingulate and precuneus which co-varied with relatively increased metabolic activity in the cerebellum. ADRP expression significantly differentiated AD from NC (AUC = 0.95) and other dementia types (AUC = 0.76–0.85) and its expression correlated with clinical measures of global cognition and neuropsychological indices in all cohorts.

BackgroundMetabolic brain imaging with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) is a supportive diagnostic and differential diagnostic tool for neurodegenerative dementias. In the clinic, scans are usually visually interpreted. However, computer-aided approaches can improve diagnostic accuracy. We aimed to build two machine learning classifiers, based on two sets of FDG PET-derived features, for differential diagnosis of common dementia syndromes.MethodsWe analyzed FDG PET scans from three dementia cohorts [63 dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease (AD), 79 dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and 23 frontotemporal dementia (FTD)], and 41 normal controls (NCs). Patients’ clinical diagnosis at follow-up (25 ± 20 months after scanning) or cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease was considered a gold standard. FDG PET scans were first visually evaluated. Scans were pre-processed, and two sets of features extracted: (1) the expressions of previously identified metabolic brain patterns, and (2) the mean uptake value in 95 regions of interest (ROIs). Two multi-class support vector machine (SVM) classifiers were tested and their diagnostic performance assessed and compared to visual reading. Class-specific regional feature importance was assessed with Shapley Additive Explanations.ResultsPattern- and ROI-based classifier achieved higher overall accuracy than expert readers (78% and 80% respectively, vs. 71%). Both SVM classifiers performed similarly to one another and to expert readers in AD (F1 = 0.74, 0.78, and 0.78) and DLB (F1 = 0.81, 0.81, and 0.78). SVM classifiers outperformed expert readers in FTD (F1 = 0.87, 0.83, and 0.63), but not in NC (F1 = 0.71, 0.75, and 0.92). Visualization of the SVM model showed bilateral temporal cortices and cerebellum to be the most important features for AD; occipital cortices, hippocampi and parahippocampi, amygdala, and middle temporal lobes for DLB; bilateral frontal cortices, middle and anterior cingulum for FTD; and bilateral angular gyri, pons, and vermis for NC.ConclusionMulti-class SVM classifiers based on the expression of characteristic metabolic brain patterns or ROI glucose uptake, performed better than experts in the differential diagnosis of common dementias using FDG PET scans. Experts performed better in the recognition of normal scans and a combined approach may yield optimal results in the clinical setting.

Nevrodegenerativne bolezni možganov, ki se klinično izrazijo kot demenca ali parkinsonizem, postajajo s staranjem prebivalstva vse pogostejše. Zgodnja in pravilna diagnoza je pomembna zaradi izključevanja ozdravljivih vzrokov, ustreznega simptomatskega zdravljenja, socialnih ukrepov in vključevanja bolnikov v klinične raziskave. Dokončno diagnozo večine nevrodegenerativnih bolezni možganov lahko postavimo le na podlagi patohistološkega vzorca možganovine. Za živa so nam v veliko pomoč funkcijske nuklearnomedicinske preiskave, s katerimi lahko prikažemo spremenjeno regionalno presnovo možganov, motnje na nivoju nevrotransmiterskih sistemov in patomorfološki substrat bolezni – kopičenje patoloških beljakovin. Glede na značilne spremembe regionalne presnove možganov, ki jih preučujemo s pozitronsko emisijsko tomografijo (PET) možganov z uporabo z radioaktivnim fluorom (18F) označene deoksiglukoze, lahko razlikujemo med alzheimerjevo boleznijo, demenco z lewyjevimi telesci, frontotemporalno demenco in redkejšimi vzroki kognitivnega upada ter med parkinsonovo boleznijo in drugimi nevrodegenerativnimi parkinsonizmi. Z ugotavljanjem integritete dopaminergičnega sistema (npr. scintigrafijo dopaminskega prenašalca; DaTSCAN) lahko razlikujemo med nevrodegenerativnimi parkinsonizmi in drugimi možnimi vzroki težav. Amiloidni PET možganov nam prikaže prisotnost in značilno razporeditev prekomernega kopičenja amiloida pri bolnikih z alzheimerjevo boleznijo že pred pojavom kliničnih znakov bolezni. V prispevku predstavljamo nuklearno medicinske preiskave, obravnavamo indikacije in značilne spremembe ter omejitve teh preiskav v diagnostiki nevrodegenerativnih bolezni možganov.

Purpose: Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is the second most common neurodegenerative dementia, that shares clinical and metabolic similarities with both Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. In this study we aimed to identify a DLB-related pattern (DLBRP), study its relationship with other metabolic brain patterns and explore its diagnostic and prognostic value. Methods: A cohort of 79 participants with DLB, 63 with dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and 41 normal controls (NCs) and their 2-[18F]FDG PET scans were analysed for identification and validation of DLBRP. Voxel-wise correlation and multiple linear regression were used to study the relation between DLBRP and Alzheimer’s disease-related pattern (ADRP), Parkinson’s disease-related pattern (PDRP) and PD-related cognitive pattern (PDCP). Diagnostic and prognostic value of DLBRP and of modified DLBRP after accounting for ADRP overlap (DLBRP ⊥ ADRP), were explored. Results: The newly identified DLBRP shared topographic similarities with ADRP (R2 = 24%) and PDRP (R2 = 37%), but not with PDCP. We could accurately discriminate between DLB and NC (AUC = 0.99) based on DLBRP expression, and between DLB and AD (AUC = 0.87) based on DLBRP ⊥ ADRP expression. DLBRP expression correlated with cognitive impairment, but the correlation was lost after accounting for ADRP overlap. DLBRP and DLBRP ⊥ ADRP correlated with patients’ survival time. Conclusion: DLBRP has proven to be a specific metabolic brain biomarker of DLB, sharing similarities with ADRP and PDRP, but not PDCP. We observed a similar metabolic mechanism underlying cognitive impairment in DLB and AD. DLB-specific metabolic changes were more detrimental for overall survival.