Search

Mutants of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SRS2 gene are hyperrecombinogenic and sensitive to genotoxic agents, and they exhibit a synthetic lethality with mutations that compromise DNA repair or other chromosomal processes. In addition, srs2 mutants fail to adapt or recover from DNA damage checkpoint-imposed G2/M arrest. These phenotypic consequences of ablating SRS2 function are effectively overcome by deleting genes of the RAD52 epistasis group that promote homologous recombination, implicating an untimely recombination as the underlying cause of the srs2 mutant phenotypes. TheSRS2-encodedproteinhasasingle-stranded (ss) DNA-dependent ATPase activity, a DNA helicase activity, and an ability to disassemble the Rad51-ssDNA nucleoprotein filament, which is the key catalytic intermediate in Rad51-mediated recombination reactions. To address the role of ATP hydrolysis in Srs2 protein function, we have constructed two mutant variants that are altered in the Walker type A sequence involved in the binding and hydrolysis of ATP. The srs2 K41A and srs2 K41R mutant proteins are both devoid of ATPase and helicase activities and the ability to displace Rad51 from ssDNA. Accordingly, yeast strains harboring these srs2 mutations are hyperrecombinogenic and sensitive to methylmethane sulfonate, and they become inviable upon introducing either the sgs1Delta or rad54Delta mutation. These results highlight the importance of the ATP hydrolysisfueled DNA motor activity in SRS2 functions.

Bacteriophage T7 lysozyme binds to T7 RNA polymerase (RNAP) and regulates its transcription by differentially repressing initiation from different T7 promoters. This selective repression is due in part to a lysozyme-induced increase in the KNTP of the initiation complex (IC) and to intrinsically different NTP concentration requirements for efficient initiation from different T7 promoters. While lysozyme represses initiation, once the enzyme has left the promoter and formed an elongation complex (EC) it is generally resistant to the effects of lysozyme. The mechanism by which the inhibitory effects of lysozyme are largely restricted to the initiation phase of transcription is not well understood. We find that T7 lysozyme destabilizes initial transcription complexes (ITCs) and increases the rate of release of transcripts from these complexes but does not destabilize ECs. However, if the RNA:RNAP interaction proposed to be important for EC stability is disrupted by proteolysis of the RNA-binding domain or use of templates which interfere with establishment of this RNA:RNAP interaction, the EC becomes sensitive to lysozyme. Comparison of the X-ray structures of T7RNAP and of a T7RNAP:T7 lysozyme complex reveals that lysozyme causes the C terminus of the polymerase to flip out of the active site. Experiments in which carboxypeptidase A is used to probe the lysozyme-induced exposure of the C terminus reveal a large decrease in carboxypeptidase sensitivity following transcription initiation, suggesting that interactions with the 3'-end of the RNA help stabilize the active site in a functional (carboxypeptidase protected) conformation. Thus, the resistance of the EC to lysozyme appears to be due to the consecutive establishment of two sets of RNA:RNAP interactions. The first is made with the 3'-end of the RNA and helps stabilize a functional conformation of the active site, thereby suppressing the effects of lysozyme on KNTP. The second is made with a more upstream element of the RNA and keeps the EC from being destabilized by lysozyme binding.

The binding of T7 lysozyme to T7 RNAP increases the apparent K m for NTP during initiation (formation of the first phosphodiester bond). It also increases the dissociation constant and dissociation rate of product dinucleotide from the polymerase. Higher NTP concentrations are required for maximal rates of productive initiation from T7 class II versus class III promoters, though individual promoters display distinct responses to changes in NTP concentrations. The greater degree of repression of class II versus class III promoters by T7 lysozyme, which appears to be important for the switch to class III gene expression during the phage life cycle, might therefore be a consequence of: (1) T7 lysozyme generally reducing the affinity of the polymerase for NTPs and increasing the rate of release of transcripts, and (2), intrinsically higher NTP concentration requirements for productive initiation from class II promoters. T7 lysozyme is also found to inhibit the addition of untemplated bases to the transcript which can occur when the elongation complex reaches the end of a template, and its effects are qualitatively similar to those reported for mutations in the extreme C terminus of T7 RNAP. Together with the locations of polymerase mutations which cause resistance or hypersensitivity to T7 lysozyme, these observations suggest that the structural mechanism of lysozyme action might include conformational changes in the C-terminal loop (aa. ∼820-883) of T7 RNAP.

By measuring steady-state rates of dinucleotide synthesis on double-stranded (d.s.) and partially single-stranded (p.s.s.) promoters, and topological unwinding due to open complex formation on plasmids, we have obtained evidence that open complex formation in bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase:promoter binary complexes is thermodynamically disfavored and that the rate of collapse of the open complex is competitive with the rate of transcription initiation. It is suggested that open complex instability is a kinetic mechanism that allows T7 RNA polymerase (RNAP) to achieve promoter specificity while still allowing for efficient promoter release. Open complex instability could also provide a mechanism for modulating the KMfor the initiating NTPs so as to allow different promoters to respond differently to physiological changes in NTP concentration.