Search

Next-generation Sequencing (NGS) of cancer tissues is increasingly being carried out to identify somatic genomic alterations that may guide physicians to make therapeutic decisions. However, a single tissue biopsy may not reflect complete genomic architecture due to the heterogeneous nature of tumors. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis is a robust noninvasive method to detect and monitor genomic alterations in blood in real time. We analyzed 28 matched tissue NGS and ctDNA from gastrointestinal and lung cancers for concordance of somatic genomic alterations, driver, and actionable alterations. Six patients (21%) had at least one concordant mutation between tissue and ctDNA sequencing. At the gene level, among all the mutations (n = 104) detected by tissue and blood sequencing, 7.7% (n = 8) of mutations were concordant. Tissue and ctDNA sequencing identified driver mutations in 60% and 64% of the tested samples, respectively. We found high discordance between tissue and ctDNA testing, especially with respect to the driver and actionable alterations. Both tissue and ctDNA NGS detected actionable alterations in 25% of patients. When somatic alterations identified by each test were combined, the total number of patients with actionable mutations increased to 32%. Our data show significant discordance between tissue NGS and ctDNA analysis. These results suggest tissue NGS and ctDNA NGS are complementary approaches rather than exclusive of each other. When performed in isolation, tissue and ctDNA NGS can each potentially miss driver and targetable alterations, suggesting that both approaches should be incorporated to enhance mutation detection rates. Larger prospective studies are needed to better clarify this emerging precision oncology landscape. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(5); 1123–32. ©2018 AACR.

Supplementary Table 1. Common genes between Caris, Paradigm and Guardant360 platforms Supplementary Table 2: Common mutations between Guardant 360 and Caris/Paradigm platforms Supplementary Table 3: Actionable mutations detected both in tissue and blood and FDA approved drugs for these mutations Supplementary Figure 1a. Patient with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma to the liver treated with mFOLFIRINOX Supplementary Figure 1b. Patient with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma to liver. Supplementary Figure 1c. Patient with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Supplementary Figure 1d. Patient with adenocarcinoma of lung

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized treatment for patients with non-small lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently approved ICIs are monoclonal antibodies that target programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1), its ligand PD-L1, or CTLA-4. With ICIs comes a novel collection of toxicities: immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). Management of IRAEs requires multidisciplinary expertise. We review the biology of IRAEs and their management in patients with squamous NSCLC.We review the pathophysiology of ICIs and IRAEs. For IRAEs related to squamous NSCLC, Cochrane Central, EMBASE, and PubMed were queried for trials with patients with squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma histology, who were assessed for incidence rates of IRAEs. Thirteen trials met inclusion criteria. National guidelines are reviewed to outline management strategies for IRAEs.IRAEs are unique compared to standard chemotherapy. As the role of ICIs expand across all stages of squamous cell NSCLC and with different combinations of antineoplastics, management of IRAEs will become crucial. Optimal management of IRAEs requires multidisciplinary teamwork. Further investigation into the pathophysiology of IRAEs can enhance current management strategies.

The process of drug approval involves extensive and expensive preclinical and clinical examination. Most drugs entering late-stage clinical trials get terminated for a variety of reasons including inability to achieve the primary endpoints or intolerable adverse effects. Only 1/10This review offers insight into some of the attributes that maybe responsible for a drug's failure in late-stage trials. Information from multiple open sources including Pubmed articles published between 1989 to 2019, recent articles from authentic websites like clinicaltrials.gov, www.fda.gov, and pharmaceutical news articles for the years between 2017 and 2021 were accumulated and summarised. Further, a few drug candidates that reached the phase III clinical trials but were discontinued at later stages have been presented as case studies.Ineluctable failures were observed due to insufficient knowledge about the mechanism of action where the disease progression stages are unclear. Other reasons were choice of patient population, late-stage treatment, and dosage. Adhering to the guidelines and recommendations provided by the regulatory authorities and learning from past failures and considerably reduce failure rates.

Background Activating fusions of the NTRK1, NTRK2 and NTRK3 genes are drivers of carcinogenesis and proliferation across a broad range of tumour types in both adult and paediatric patients. Recently, the FDA granted tumour-agnostic approvals of TRK inhibitors, larotrectinib and entrectinib, based on significant and durable responses in multiple primary tumour types. Unfortunately, testing rates in clinical practice remain quite low. Adding plasma next-generation sequencing of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) to tissue-based testing increases the detection rate of oncogenic drivers and demonstrates high concordance with tissue genotyping. However, the clinical potential of ctDNA analysis to identify NTRK fusion-positive tumours has been largely unexplored. Methods We retrospectively reviewed a ctDNA database in advanced stage solid tumours for NTRK1 fusions. Results NTRK1 fusion events, with nine unique fusion partners, were identified in 37 patients. Of the cases for which clinical data were available, 44% had tissue testing for NTRK1 fusions; the NTRK1 fusion detected by ctDNA was confirmed in tissue in 88% of cases. Here, we report for the first time that minimally-invasive plasma NGS can detect NTRK fusions with a high positive predictive value. Conclusion Plasma ctDNA represents a rapid, non-invasive screening method for this rare genomic target that may improve identification of patients who can benefit from TRK-targeted therapy and potentially identify subsequent on- and off-target resistance mechanisms.

Chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression is an acute, dose-limiting toxicity of chemotherapy regimens used in the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Trilaciclib protects haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells from chemotherapy-induced damage (myeloprotection). To assess the totality of the myeloprotective benefits of trilaciclib, including analysis of several clinically relevant but low-frequency events, an exploratory composite endpoint comprising five major adverse haematological events (MAHE) was prospectively defined: all-cause hospitalisations, all-cause chemotherapy dose reductions, febrile neutropenia (FN), prolonged severe neutropenia (SN) and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions on/after week 5. MAHE and its individual components were assessed in three randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2 trials in patients receiving a platinum/etoposide or topotecan-containing chemotherapy regimen for ES-SCLC, and in data pooled from the three trials. A total of 242 patients were randomised across the three trials (trilaciclib, n = 123; placebo, n = 119). In the individual trials and the pooled analysis, administering trilaciclib prior to chemotherapy resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the cumulative incidence of MAHE compared with placebo. In the pooled analysis, the cumulative incidences of all-cause chemotherapy dose reductions, FN, prolonged SN and RBC transfusions on/after week 5 were significantly reduced with trilaciclib versus placebo; however, no significant difference was observed in rates of all-cause hospitalisations. Additionally, compared with placebo, trilaciclib significantly extended the amount of time patients remained free of MAHE. These data support the myeloprotective benefits of trilaciclib and its ability to improve the overall safety profile of myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimens used to treat patients with ES-SCLC. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Introduction: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which accounts for the majority of lung cancer diagnoses in the United States, has many known driver mutations, including MET exon 14 skipping muta...

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (EGFRm) are common oncogene drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This real-world study explored treatment patterns and time to receive EGFRm test results in patients with advanced EGFRm NSCLC.A cross-sectional medical chart review was completed May-August 2020 in Australia, Canada, Germany, Italy, South Korea, Taiwan, UK, and USA. Eligible patients had advanced NSCLC and a positive EGFRm test result January-December 2017. Data were abstracted from NSCLC diagnosis to end of follow-up (31 March 2020) or patient's death whichever occurred earlier. The index date was the date of EGFRm confirmation.223 physicians provided data for 1,793 patients. Patients' mean age was 64.7 years, 54 % were male, 30.7 % had no history of smoking. Overall, 78 % of EGFRm test results were received ≤ 2 weeks after request (range of median 7-14 days across countries). Median time from advanced NSCLC diagnosis to EGFRm test result was 18 days (median range 10-22 days across countries). Over a third (37 %) of patients received a systemic treatment prior to EGFRm result; chemotherapy (25 %) and EGFR-TKI (15 %) were most commonly prescribed; post-EGFR test-result was EGFR-TKI (68 %); 80 % of patients initiated EGFR-TKI at any time point post-NSCLC diagnosis. Of those receiving a first-line EGFR-TKI post-EGFRm testing, 84 % received a TKI alone, 12 % in combination with chemotherapy, and 3 % with other treatments. Median time from first-line EGFR-TKI initiation post-EGFRm testing to first subsequent treatment was 19.8 months.Over one-fifth of patients wait14 days for their EGFRm test results, affecting their likelihood of receiving first-line EGFR-TKI with 20 % of patients never receiving EGFR TKI treatment. There was significant inter-country variability in the proportion of patients receiving EGFR TKIs. Our study highlights the need to improve EGFRm testing turnaround times and treatment initiation across countries.

Non-secretory multiple myeloma (NSMM) constitutes a distinct entity of multiple myeloma characterized by the absence of detectable monoclonal protein and rarely an absence of free light chains in the serum and urine. Given its rarity, the genomic landscape, clinical course, and prognosis of NSSM are not well characterized. Here, we report a case of a patient with relapsed and refractory NSMM with brain metastasis harboring a TFG-ALK fusion showing a dramatic and durable (over two years) response to commercially available anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors. The case emphasizes the beneficial role of molecular profiling in this target-poor disease.

Dostarlimab is an anti-programmed cell death protein-1 antibody being evaluated in recurrent/advanced solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), in the ongoing Phase I, multi-center, open-label, 2-part (dose escalation and cohort expansion) GARNET study (NCT02715284).Here, we report an interim analysis of patients with recurrent/advanced NSCLC who progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients received dostarlimab (500 mg IV every 3 weeks [Q3W] for Cycles 1-4, then 1000 mg Q6W) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity for2 years. The primary endpoints were immune-related objective response rate (irORR) per investigator-assessed irRECIST and safety.As of 8, July 2019, 67 patients with recurrent/advanced NSCLC were enrolled and treated with dostarlimab; the majority had programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS)1% (35.8% of patients) or PD-L1 TPS 1%-49% (29.9% of patients); 7.5% had PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%, and 26.9% had unknown PD-L1 TPS status. Median follow-up was 13.8 months (range: 0.0-22.6). irORR was 26.9%, including 2 complete and 16 partial responses. The median duration of response of 11.6 months (range: 2.8-19.4). Responses were observed in 2 of 24 (16.7%) patients with PD-L1 TPS1%, 4 of 20 (20.0%) patients with PD-L1 TPS 1%-49% and 2 of 5 (40.0%) patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%. Fatigue (4.5%) was the most common Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse event (TRAE). Immune-related TRAEs (any grade) were observed in 28.4% of patients.Dostarlimab demonstrated promising antitumor activity in advanced/recurrent NSCLC that progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy, including across all PD-L1 subgroups, and has an acceptable safety profile.

Background The objective of this study was to investigate real-world EGFR mutation testing in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) upon progression on first−/second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), and subsequent treatments received. Methods Flatiron Health electronic health records-derived database was used to identify adult patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with first−/second-generation EGFR-TKI from 11/2015–09/2017, with start of first EGFR-TKI defined as the index date. Patients were stratified by receipt of EGFR-TKI as first-line (1 L) or later-line (2 L+) treatment. Mutation testing and subsequent therapies following first−/second-generation EGFR-TKI were described. Results Overall, 782 patients (1 L = 435; 2 L+ =347) were included. Median age was 69.0 years, 63.6% were female, 56.3% were white, 87.1% were treated in community-based practices, and 30.1% of patients died during the study period; median follow-up was 309.0 days. Among the 294 (1 L = 160; 2L+ =134) patients who received subsequent therapies, treatments included chemotherapy only (1 L = 15.6%; 2L+ =21.6%), immunotherapy only (1 L = 13.8%; 2 L+ =41.0%), and targeted therapies (1 L = 70.0%; 2 L+ =36.6%). Specifically, 40 (25.0%) 1 L patients and 7 (5.2%) 2 L+ patients received osimertinib as subsequent therapy. Before the start of subsequent therapy, EGFR T790M resistance mutation testing was performed in 88 (29.9%) patients (1 L = 63 [39.4%]; 2 L+ =25 [18.7%]). Of these patients, 25 (28.4%) were T790M positive, among whom 24 (96.0%) received osimertinib. Conclusions A third of patients received subsequent therapies on disease progression; only 30% of these were tested for EGFR-TKI resistance mutation, prior to receiving subsequent therapies. These results highlight the importance of choosing treatments in the 1 L setting that optimize benefits for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Clinical trials with first- and second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) reported severe adverse events (SAEs) in 6%-49% of patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer. This study describes incremental healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs associated with real-world management of AEs in this population, with a focus on SAEs.Patients receiving erlotinib, gefitinib, or afatinib as first-line (1L) monotherapy were identified from IQVIA™ Real-World Data Adjudicated Claims-US database (04/01/2012-03/31/2017). Relevant AEs were selected from corresponding prescribing information; SAEs were identified from hospitalization claims. HRU and cost per-patient-per-month (PPPM) were assessed during 1L treatment and compared for patients with and without each AE using multivariate Poisson and linear regression, respectively, adjusting for baseline characteristics.Of 1646 patients, 86.9% were treated with erlotinib, 12.1% with afatinib, and 1.0% with gefitinib. In 1L, 12.2% of patients had ≥1 acute SAE (220.1/1000 patient-years). Patients with any SAE had higher PPPM costs than patients without SAEs (cost difference = $4700, p 0.001). Incremental costs ranged from $2604 PPPM for diarrhea to $10,143 PPPM for microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA), and were statistically significant for all SAEs (all p 0.001) except MAHA (p 0.0528). Patients with any SAEs had higher rates of HRU relative to patients without SAEs (hospitalization rate ratio = 6.15; outpatient visits rate ratio = 1.21; all p 0.001).More than one-tenth of patients experienced SAEs, resulting in sizeable economic burden with respect to HRU and costs. EGFR-TKIs with more favorable safety profiles may reduce the burden of managing this population.

Current experimental and clinical data are inadequate to conclusively predict the oncogenicity of uncommon BRAF mutants and their sensitivity towards kinase inhibitors. Therefore, the present study aims at estimating sensitivity profiles of uncommon lung cancer specific BRAF mutations towards clinically approved as well as experimental therapeutics based on computationally derived direct binding energies. Based on the data derived from cBioportal, BRAF mutants displayed significant mutual exclusivity with KRAS and EGFR mutants indicating them as potential drivers in lung cancer. Predicted sensitivity of BRAF-V600E conformed to published experimental and clinical data thus validating the usefulness of computational approach. The BRAF-V600K displayed higher sensitivity to most inhibitors as compared to that of the BRAF-V600E. All the uncommon mutants displayed higher sensitivity than both the wild type and BRAF-V600E towards PLX 8394 and LSN3074753. While V600K, G469R and N581S displayed favorable sensitivity profiles to most inhibitors, V600L/M, G466A/E/V and G469A/V displayed resistance profiles to a variable degree. Notably, molecular dynamic (MD) simulation revealed that increased number of interactions caused enhanced sensitivity of G469R and N581S towards sorafenib. RAF kinase inhibitors were further classified into two groups as per their selectivity (Group I: BRAF-V600E-selective and Group II: CRAF-selective) based on which potential mutation-wise combinations of RAF kinase inhibitors were proposed to overcome resistance. Based on computational inhibitor sensitivity profiles, appropriate treatment strategies may be devised to prevent or overcome secondary drug resistance in lung cancer patients with uncommon mutations.

401 Background: This study compares patient characteristics, clinical conditions, the prevalence and timing of lung cancer symptoms, and diagnostic procedures from onset to mNCSLC diagnosis for patients with and without targetable mutations. Methods: This was a retrospective claims analysis of Medicare Advantage and commercially insured adult mNSCLC patients (11/01/2012 - 01/31/2020) with continuous health plan enrollment (24 months pre-index and ≥2 months post-index) around the index date (mNSCLC diagnosis). Patients on targeted therapy post-diagnosis were assigned to the targeted group (TG); non-targeted group (NTG) otherwise. Twenty pre-specified lung cancer related symptoms, baseline comorbidities, and diagnostic procedures were examined in the pre-index period. Results: The study comprised 2,940 patients (TG: 390; NTG: 2,550); TG had lower mean age (65.8yrs vs 69.2yrs; p < 0.001), more females (59.5% vs 50.6%; p = 0.001), and lower tobacco use (55.9% vs 92.5%; p < 0.001). Mean TG Charlson score was 1.37 in the TG vs 1.93 in the NTG; p < 0.001. There were no significant differences in prevalence of any lung cancer related symptoms (TG 81.8% vs NTG 83.5%; p = 0.4). When comparing the 20 individual, pre-specified lung cancer related symptoms (cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis, etc.), there were also no significant differences between the study cohorts. For patients with symptoms, the mean times from the first symptom to mNSCLC diagnosis were similar (TG: 339.3 days; NTG: 363.1 days; p = 0.13)(Table). There were significant differences in the proportion of patients with comorbidities between study cohorts (TG 64.4% vs NTG 73.5%; p < 0.001). Among patients within TG, there was higher prevalence of pleural effusion (22.1% vs 12.6%; p < 0.001) and lower prevalence of COPD (17.7% vs 50.8%; p < 0.001). For diagnostic procedures, patients in TG had fewer imaging procedures than NTG (Chest x-ray 67.7% vs. 74.1%; p = 0.008, CT scan 57.2% vs 63.5%; p = 0.016, PET scan 19.0% vs 27.1%; p < 0.001); and a longer mean time from first symptom to first imaging procedure (TG: 220 days; NTG: 184 days; p = 0.015)(Table). Conclusions: Patients with and without targetable mutations may differ by some patient characteristics, but they may not differ by presentation and type of lung cancer related symptoms leading up to diagnosis.[Table: see text]

Context.— Precision therapies for patients with driver mutations can offer deep and durable responses that correlate with diagnosis, metastasis prognosis, and improvement in survival. The use of such targeted therapies will continue to increase, pushing us to change our traditional approaches. We needed to search for new tools to effectively integrate technological advancements into our practices because of their capability to improve the efficiency and accuracy of our diagnostic and treatment approaches. Perhaps nothing is as relevant as identifying and implementing new workflows for processing pathologic specimens and for improving communication of critical laboratory information to and from clinicians for appropriate care of patients in an efficient and timely manner. Objectives.— To define the gold standard in delivering the best care for patients, to identify gaps in the process, and to identify potential solutions that would improve our process, including gaps related to knowledge, skills, attitudes, and practices. Design.— We assembled a multidisciplinary team to systematically perform a gap analysis study to clarify the discrepancy between the current reality in pathology specimen processing and the desired optimal situation to deliver the results intended for patient care. Results.— A practical collaborative workflow for specimen management that seeks the cooperation of stakeholders in each medical discipline to provide guidelines in specimen collection, delivery, processing, and reporting of results with the ultimate goal of improving patient outcomes is provided. Conclusions.— New tools are required to effectively integrate data-driven approaches in specimen processing to meet the new demands.

The oncogenic role ERBB2 amplification is well established in breast and gastric cancers. This has led to the development of a well-known portfolio of monoclonal antibodies and kinase inhibitors targeting the ERBB2 kinase. More recently, activating mutations in the ERBB2 gene have been increasingly reported in multiple solid cancers and were shown to play an oncogenic role similar to that of ERBB2 amplification. Thus, ERBB2 mutations define a distinct molecular subtype of solid tumors and serve as actionable targets. However, efforts to target ERBB2 mutation has met with limited clinical success, possibly because of their low frequency, inadequate understanding of the biological activity of these mutations, and difficulty in separating the drivers from the passenger mutations. Given the current impetus to deliver molecularly targeted treatments for cancer, there is an important need to understand the therapeutic potential of ERBB2 mutations. Here we review the distribution of ERBB2 mutations in different tumor types, their potential as a novel biomarker that defines new subsets in many cancers, and current data on preclinical and clinical efforts to target these mutations. Implications for Practice A current trend in oncology is to identify novel genomic drivers of solid tumors and developing precision treatments that target them. ERBB2 amplification is an established therapeutic target in breast and gastric cancers, but efforts to translate this finding to other solid tumors with ERBB2 amplification have not been effective. Recently the focus has turned to targeting activating ERBB2 mutations. The year 2018 marked an important milestone in establishing ERBB2 mutation as an important actionable target in multiple cancer types. There have been several recent preclinical and clinical studies evaluating ERBB2 mutation as a therapeutic target with varying success. With increasing access to next-generation sequencing technologies in the clinic, oncologists are frequently identifying activating ERBB2 mutations in patients with cancer. There is a significant need both from the clinician and bench scientist perspectives to understand the current state of affairs for ERBB2 mutations.

Introduction: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are well-described drivers of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have become key components of the NSCLC front-line treatment landscape. Tumors inevitably develop resistance to these agents, and development efforts continue to focus on identifying mechanisms of resistance and drugs to target these mechanisms. Areas covered: With several EGFR TKIs approved for use in the first-line or in later-line settings, an understanding of the efficacy and safety of these inhibitors in various populations is warranted. Furthermore, given the frequent emergence of drug resistance in NSCLC, examination of tumor tissue throughout the disease course provides the opportunity to select treatments based on the tumor's mutation profile. Here, we discuss: key efficacy and safety findings for approved and investigational EGFR TKIs; known mechanisms of resistance, particularly the T790M acquired EGFR mutation; and recent advances in EGFR mutational testing that may facilitate less invasive tissue testing and guide treatment selection. Expert commentary: The expanding armamentarium of EGFR TKIs, improvements in the understanding of resistance mechanisms and technological developments in the molecular analysis of tumors may help render EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC a chronic disease in many patients by facilitating optimal sequential therapy.

The development of first-, second-, and third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has revolutionized the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring mutations in the EGFR. However, limited data are available regarding the activity of available EGFR TKIs against uncommon EGFR mutations. This is an important question because improvements in screening techniques are facilitating the identification of patients with uncommon mutations for whom optimal treatment has not yet been clarified. This uncertainty reflects the fact that most prospective clinical trials of EGFR TKIs have been restricted to patients with tumor harboring common (Del19 or L858R) mutations. In this article, we discuss the nature of EGFR mutation heterogeneity in NSCLC and review recent preclinical and clinical data that have assessed the sensitivity of different mutations to different EGFR TKIs. Recent preclinical data indicate that second-generation ErbB family blockers, such as afatinib, have a broad activity profile across uncommon EGFR mutations. Emerging evidence indicates that the preclinical data for afatinib are reflected in the clinic. Subanalysis of clinical trials, and real-world data, demonstrate that EGFRs with defined, but uncommon mutations such as G719X, S768I, and L861Q are sensitive to afatinib, which is now approved for tumors harboring these mutations. A recent clinical trial has demonstrated that EGFRs harboring some of these less common mutations also appear to be sensitive to the third-generation EGFR TKI, osimertinib. Treatment options for tumors with other uncommon mutations, notably exon 20 insertion, remain an area of unmet need, although osimertinib has shown preclinical activity in this setting, and early clinical activity has been seen with the dual EGFR/HER2 TKIs, poziotinib and TAK-788. Further data are required to help drive appropriate treatment decisions in patients whose tumors harbor these uncommon EGFR mutations. To see an abstract video summarising the content of the paper, please visit http://usscicomms.com/oncology/masood/seminars-in-oncology/.

The standard of care treatment for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) includes both chemotherapy and definitive radiation. However, there are limited data on the optimal management of stage II NPC. We performed a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database to analyze the treatment patterns and role of chemotherapy in patients with stage II NPC. We identified 611 patients diagnosed with T1‐2, N0‐1, M0 NPC, from 2004 to 2013. Five‐year survival was calculated using Kaplan Meier (KM) analysis. Multivariable analysis and propensity matched analysis were performed to analyze the impact of chemotherapy on overall survival. Of the 611 patients, 527 underwent concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) and 84 received radiation only. Unadjusted KM analysis showed improved 5‐year survival in the CCRT group compared to radiation only (80.5% vs 65.7%; P = 0.0021). Multivariable analysis also showed improved survival with the addition of chemotherapy (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.59; 95 CI 0.39‐0.89; P = 0.0124). Propensity matched analysis confirmed a significant clinical benefit from the addition of chemotherapy to radiation. Age ≥ 65 years (HR 2.41; 95% CI 1.71‐3.4; P = 1 (HR 2.82; 95% CI 1.49‐5.31; P = 0.0014) and positive lymph node status (HR 1.6; 95% CI 1.04‐2.46; P = 0.0340) were associated with worse survival. In this retrospective analysis, patients with stage II NPC had improved survival with CCRT compared to definitive radiation only. Elderly patients with comorbidities had worse outcomes.

8543 Background: Patients with early stage, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with solitary pulmonary lesions ≤4 cm typically have favorable outcomes. However, disease recurrence impacts up to 30% of patients, leading to either additional surgical or systemic interventions. New methods to risk stratify patients based on clinical and molecular parameters may improve our ability to select cases that would benefit from more frequent surveillance or enrollment in clinical trials evaluating systemic therapy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 179 patients with early stage (T1a-2aN0M0) NSCLC from a single institution. All patients had anatomic resection, negative margins, and systematic nodal sampling. Clinical and demographic data were abstracted from patient charts and tumor samples were molecularly profiled using the Tempus xT solid tumor assay (DNA-seq of 595-648 genes at 500x coverage, whole exome-capture RNA-seq). Pathogenic alterations (single nucleotide variants and insertion/deletions) and RNA expression were examined. Bivariate Cox-proportional Hazards models were used to assess the association of individual clinical, demographic, and molecular variables with recurrence-free survival, defined as the time from surgery until recurrence or death. Results: Our dataset included 166 stage IA1-3 patients and 13 stage IB patients, of which 36 patients experienced a recurrence or death event after surgery. Clinical and DNA-seq data was available for all patients, and RNA expression data was available for 172 patients. Across all patients, the most common somatically mutated genes were TP53 (33% of tumors) and KRAS (16% of tumors), consistent with previous studies. Increasing log10-RNA expression for NTRK1 (HR: 5.95; 95% CI, 1.16-30.4; p = 0.027) and CD274 (PD-L1) (HR: 7.88; 95% CI, 1.61-38.6; p = 0.013) and decreasing log10-RNA expression for EGFR (HR: 0.24; 95% CI, 0.05-1.21; p = 0.071) and ERBB2 (Her2) (HR: 0.20; 95% CI, 0.04-0.97; p = 0.042) were associated with increased risk of recurrence or death. Conclusions: Increased expression of NTRK1 and CD274 (PD-L1) and decreased expression of EGFR and ERBB2 (Her2) were associated with a increased risk for recurrence following surgery. This may have mechanistic implications for heightened tumor aggressiveness and/or metastatic potential. Future work will expand our cohort and validate our findings in a broader set of early-stage NSCLC patients.

The first biosimilar of bevacizumab was approved by the US FDA; other potential biosimilars of bevacizumab are in late-stage clinical development. Their availability offers opportunity for increased patient access across a number of oncologic indications. The regulatory pathway for biosimilar approval relies on the totality of evidence that includes a comprehensive analytical assessment, and a clinical comparability study in a relevant disease patient population. Extrapolation of indications for a biosimilar to other eligible indications held by the originator, in the absence of direct clinical comparison, frequently forms part of the regulatory judgment. Herein, we consider the evidence required to demonstrate biosimilarity for bevacizumab biosimilars, with particular focus on the rationale for extrapolation across oncologic indications.

Colorectal cancer (CRC), a disease of high incidence and mortality, has had few treatment advances owing to a large degree of inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity. Attempts to classify subtypes of colorectal cancer to develop treatment strategies has been attempted by Consensus Molecular Subtypes (CMS) classification. However, the cellular etiology of CMS classification is incompletely understood and controversial. Here, we generated and analyzed a single-cell transcriptome atlas of 49,859 CRC cells from 16 patients, validated with an additional 31,383 cells from an independent CRC patient cohort. We describe subclonal transcriptomic heterogeneity of CRC tumor epithelial cells, as well as discrete stromal populations of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). Within CRC CAFs, we identify the transcriptional signature of specific subtypes (CAF-S1 and CAF-S4) in more than 1,500 CRC patients using bulk transcriptomic data that significantly stratifies overall survival in multiple independent cohorts. We also uncovered two CAF-S1 subpopulations, ecm-myCAF and TGFß-myCAF, known to be associated with primary resistance to immunotherapies. We demonstrate that scRNA analysis of malignant, stromal, and immune cells exhibit a more complex picture than portrayed by bulk transcriptomic-based Consensus Molecular Subtypes (CMS) classification. By demonstrating an abundant degree of heterogeneity amongst these cell types, our work shows that CRC is best represented in a transcriptomic continuum crossing traditional classification systems boundaries. Overall, this CRC cell map provides a framework to re-evaluate CRC tumor biology with implications for clinical trial design and therapeutic development.

Introduction Multilineage myelosuppression is an acute toxicity of cytotoxic chemotherapy, resulting in serious complications and dose modifications. Current therapies are lineage specific and administered after chemotherapy damage has occurred. Trilaciclib is a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor that is administered prior to chemotherapy to preserve hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and immune system function during chemotherapy (myelopreservation). Methods In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial, patients with previously treated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) were randomized to receive intravenous trilaciclib 240 mg/m2 or placebo before topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 on days 1–5 of each 21-day cycle. Primary endpoints were duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) in cycle 1 and occurrence of severe neutropenia (SN). Additional endpoints were prespecified to further assess the effect of trilaciclib on myelopreservation, safety, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and antitumor efficacy. Results Thirty-two patients received trilaciclib, and 29 patients received placebo. Compared with placebo, administration of trilaciclib prior to topotecan resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful decreases in DSN in cycle 1 (mean [standard deviation] 2 [3.9] versus 7 [6.2] days; adjusted one-sided P

There are limited data on the role for chemotherapy in patients80 years old with advanced stage non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to evaluate treatment patterns and outcomes for patients ≥80 years old with advanced NSCLC.We identified patients diagnosed with metastatic NSCLC between 2004 and 2014. We divided them into two groups:80 years old (n = 218,365) and ≥ 80 years old (n = 33,352). Patient characteristics including median age at diagnosis, gender, ethnicity, histology, chemotherapy status, tumor grade, treatment center, insurance status, income, education, and Charlson-Deyo co-morbidity index were collected. Continuous variables were compared using t-test and categorical variables were compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Multivariable (MV) and propensity matched analyses were performed to analyze the impact of chemotherapy on overall survival.We identified 33,352 patients80 years old diagnosed with advanced NSCLC. Only 29 % received chemotherapy, those who received chemotherapy had improved median overall survival of 8 months compared to 2 months in patients not receiving chemotherapy; adjusted hazards ratio (HR) 0.46; confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.47; p .001. MV analysis showed benefit of chemotherapy in all age subgroups (80-84 years, 85-89 years and 90+ years; p .0001) and it was confirmed by propensity matched analysis. Patients receiving multiagent chemotherapy had improved 1-year survival of 35.5 % compared to 32.8 % with single agent chemotherapy (adjusted HR 0.92; CI 0.88-0.96; p .001). Despite benefit from chemotherapy, the proportion of patients age ≥ 80 years receiving chemotherapy did not change over time.Chemotherapy improved overall survival in ≥80 years old patients with advanced stage NSCLC. Despite improved survival and an increase in the proportion of ≥80 years old patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC, less than one-third receive chemotherapy.

The optimal treatment strategy for resected stage I large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung (LCNEC) remains unknown. In this analysis, we evaluate the impact of systemic chemotherapy on patients with stage I LCNEC who have undergone surgical resection.The study population included patients who underwent surgical resection for LCNEC and had pathologic stage I disease. We compared overall survival between patients who underwent surgical resection alone and those who underwent surgical resection plus chemotherapy. Overall survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparisons were analyzed by using multivariable Cox models and propensity score-matched analyses.From 2004 to 2013, 1232 patients underwent surgical resection for stage I LCNEC in the National Cancer Database, including 957 patients (77.7%) who underwent surgical resection alone and 275 (22.3%) who received both surgery and systemic chemotherapy. Five-year survival was significantly improved in patients who received chemotherapy (64.5% versus 48.4% [hazard ratio =0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.68, p0.001]). Multivariable Cox modeling confirmed the survival benefit from chemotherapy for patients with resected stage I LCNEC (hazard ratio = 0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.68, p0.0001). The survival benefit was further confirmed by propensity-matched analysis. In addition, older (age70 years), comorbid white patients who underwent sublobar resections for tumors larger than 20 mm had worse survival outcomes.In this largest-reported retrospective study of patients with resected stage I LCNEC, survival was improved in patients who received chemotherapy in both stage IA and stage IB LCNEC.

Next-generation Sequencing (NGS) of cancer tissues is increasingly being carried out to identify somatic genomic alterations that may guide physicians to make therapeutic decisions. However, a single tissue biopsy may not reflect complete genomic architecture due to the heterogeneous nature of tumors. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis is a robust noninvasive method to detect and monitor genomic alterations in blood in real time. We analyzed 28 matched tissue NGS and ctDNA from gastrointestinal and lung cancers for concordance of somatic genomic alterations, driver, and actionable alterations. Six patients (21%) had at least one concordant mutation between tissue and ctDNA sequencing. At the gene level, among all the mutations (n = 104) detected by tissue and blood sequencing, 7.7% (n = 8) of mutations were concordant. Tissue and ctDNA sequencing identified driver mutations in 60% and 64% of the tested samples, respectively. We found high discordance between tissue and ctDNA testing, especially with respect to the driver and actionable alterations. Both tissue and ctDNA NGS detected actionable alterations in 25% of patients. When somatic alterations identified by each test were combined, the total number of patients with actionable mutations increased to 32%. Our data show significant discordance between tissue NGS and ctDNA analysis. These results suggest tissue NGS and ctDNA NGS are complementary approaches rather than exclusive of each other. When performed in isolation, tissue and ctDNA NGS can each potentially miss driver and targetable alterations, suggesting that both approaches should be incorporated to enhance mutation detection rates. Larger prospective studies are needed to better clarify this emerging precision oncology landscape. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(5); 1123–32. ©2018 AACR.

Background The ErbB family blocker, afatinib, is approved for patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) of the lung following platinum-doublet chemotherapy but has not been explored following immunochemotherapy. Here, we assessed the characteristics and outcomes of patients with SqCC of the lung who received second-line afatinib or chemotherapy after first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in a “real-world” setting. Methods In this retrospective, multisite cohort study, community oncologists identified eligible patients and extracted data from electronic health records. Primary outcome measures were patient demographics and clinical characteristics, time on treatment, and incidence of severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Results Two hundred patients were included: 99 received second-line afatinib and 101 received second-line chemotherapy. Median age was 68 and 66 years, respectively; 35% and 3% of patients had mixed histology tumors, and 39% and 5% of tumors were epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive (EGFRm+). Median time on treatment was 7.3 months with afatinib (mixed histology/SqCC tumors: 8.1/5.8 months; EGFRm+/EGFRm– tumors: 7.4/5.9 months) and 4.2 months with chemotherapy. Grade 3/4 irAEs were observed in 6 patients in the afatinib cohort (all had a prior grade 3/4 irAE during first-line therapy) and no patients in the chemotherapy cohort. The most common adverse drug reactions with afatinib were diarrhea (26%), rash (6%), stomatitis, fatigue, and nausea (5% each). Conclusion Encouraging time on treatment, and absence of newly diagnosed irAEs, indicate that afatinib is a treatment option following immunochemotherapy in patients with SqCC of the lung, and is currently the only approved oral agent in this setting.

Patients with stage I small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) are candidates for surgery; however, not much is known regarding the utilization of surgical resection in the management of stage I SCLC and the factors that determine the patient's ability to receive surgery.The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database was used to identify patients with stage I SCLC from 2007 to 2013. Continuous variables were compared with 1-way analysis of variance, and categorical variables were compared with χOf the 1902 patients with stage I SCLC, 427 (22.4%) underwent resection, 116 (6.1%) resection and radiation, 815 (42.8%) received radiation alone, and 544 (28.6%) did not undergo surgery or radiation. Median overall survival for patients with surgery plus radiation was 60+ months, followed by surgery alone at 50 months, radiation at 27 months, and no resection/radiation 16 months. Patients with ≥ 4 lymph nodes removed during surgery had better overall survival of 60+ months compared with patients with 4 lymph nodes removed (25 months); P .001. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that elderly patients, men, African American individuals, Medicaid recipients, and patients with left-sided tumors were less likely to undergo resection. However, county-level socioeconomic factors, such as level of poverty, education, unemployment, and median income did not affect the likelihood of undergoing resection.Fewer than one-third of all patients with stage I SCLC undergo resection despite better outcomes with resection. Elderly African American men with Medicaid insurance were less likely to receive resection.

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second most common type of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. FL is an incurable disease with treatment options ranging from a "watch-and-wait" approach to localized therapy with radiation or systemic therapy with rituximab in combination with chemotherapy regimens. This review summarizes the role of rituximab across the spectrum of FL treatment and the evolving therapeutic landscape with the emergence of novel agents currently in clinical development. Despite the prospect of new agents on the horizon, it is widely accepted that rituximab will remain as the cornerstone of therapy because of its established long-term efficacy. Many biologics, including rituximab, have lost exclusivity of composition-of-matter patent or will do so in the next few years, which is a concern for patients and physicians alike. Moreover, access to rituximab is challenging, particularly in countries with restricted resources. Together, these concerns have fueled the development of safe and effective biosimilars. The term "biosimilar" refers to a biologic product that is highly similar to an approved reference (or originator) product, notwithstanding minor differences in clinically inactive components, and for which there are no clinically meaningful differences in purity, potency, or safety. Biosimilars are developed to treat the same condition(s) using the same treatment regimens as an approved reference biologic, and have the potential to increase access to more affordable treatment of FL. Herein, we also discuss the potential benefits of eagerly awaited rituximab biosimilars, which may mitigate the impact of the lack of access to rituximab.