Search

293 Background: NET-02 was a multi-centre, randomised (1:1), non-comparative phase II trial of nal-IRI/5-FU/folinic acid (ARM A) or docetaxel (ARM B) in pts with progressive PD-EP-NEC, aimed at selecting a treatment for evaluation in a phase III trial. Primary analysis (N = 58) showed ARM A, but not ARM B, achieved the target 6-month progression-free survival rate primary endpoint (McNamara et al. ASCO 2022). HRQoL was a secondary endpoint in NET-02. Methods: HRQoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and GINET21 (at baseline (BL), 6-weekly intervals and at disease progression). The mean change from BL was estimated for each scale by timepoint and treatment arm. Results are presented where there were ≥4 responses per time point. Scores were considered stable if they did not change by > 10 points from BL. The mean BL C30 scores for all pts were compared to United Kingdom (UK) population normative C30 data using a 2-sample t-test. Results: Fifty-four of 58 pts (93%) completed a BL questionnaire; of these, 39 (72%) completed ≥1 post-BL questionnaire, with 21 (51%) completing questionnaires at progression. Global health status (GHS) and all functional scales in ARM A remained stable from BL to intervals pre-progression, with a sustained improvement in role functioning observed post-BL. In ARM B, GHS and all C30 functional scales decreased by > 10 points between BL and week 18 (worsening of QoL). Both arms had a > 10-point increase from BL in constipation and diarrhoea in ≥1 post-BL time point. In ARM A, pain, insomnia and financial problems decreased from BL. No C30 symptom scales in ARM B were consistently lower post-BL. Patterns of change in GINET21 mean score were similar in both arms: body image, disease-related worries, information/communication, sexual function and social function all had a > 10-point reduction in score from BL (indicating improvement in symptoms/problems); endocrine and gastrointestinal symptoms remained stable; muscle/bone pain varied across time points, initially showing a reduction in pain followed by an increase, compared to BL. In comparison to the UK C30 norms (BL all pts), 11 of 15 C30 scales did not significantly differ (P > 0.05). Mean scores for fatigue and appetite loss were significantly higher than UK C30 norms (worse symptoms in pts from NET-02) (P = 0.03, P = 0.0003 respectively). However, emotional functioning and GHS were significantly better in pts from NET-02 (P = 0.001, P = 0.03 respectively). Role and social functioning were lower in pts from NET-02 (both P = 0.06) (poorer level of functioning). Conclusions: HRQoL was maintained and potentially improved with nal-IRI/5-FU/folinic acid, but not docetaxel. Compared to the UK general population, BL QoL did not substantially differ in pts from NET-02. Clinical trial information: NCT03837977.

Background: Irrespective of the underlying aetiology, 90% of hepatocellular carcinomas arise and progress on a background of chronic inflammation. We have explored the independent prognostic value of circulating inflammatory cells. Methods: Peripheral blood count data sets from 583 consecutive patients presenting to a single UK centre (2000–2010) were analysed for associations with tumour stage, liver function, performance status (PST) and survival. Validation was in an independent Hong Kong cohort (585 patients; 2007–2013). Results: In both UK and Hong Kong cohorts, neutrophils, platelets, lymphocytes, the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) correlated stepwise, either increasing or decreasing (lymphocytes), with tumour node metastasis (TNM) and Childs–Pugh stage, PST and consequently with the combined Barcelona Clinic for Liver Cancer stage. Survival analyses confirmed the NLR and SII as highly significant prognostic biomarkers. Focused on individual cell types, only the neutrophil count was independently associated with both TNM stage and PST, as well as being significantly and independently associated with poorer survival. Conclusions: In this study of 1168 patients, neutrophils alone, rather than lymphocytes or platelets, were independently associated with outcome. These data support further characterisation of a potentially distinctive role for neutrophils as facilitators of tumour progression and deteriorating performance.

499 Background: Regorafenib was the first treatment to demonstrate a survival benefit in patients with HCC after progression on sorafenib. The RESORCE trial found that regorafenib improved overall survival with acceptable toxicity, in patients with disease progression on sorafenib who tolerated ≥400mg sorafenib daily and had Child-Pugh A liver function. Methods: We performed a multicentre, retrospective, observational study of patients with HCC receiving regorafenib in the UK, following its availability in April 2018. Results: Data on a total of 104 patients were included from April 2018–August 2019, and 80.8% were male. Age was collected in 85 patients, with a median of 68 years (range 22–86). 23.5% had NAFLD, 21.2% had ALD, 12.9% had HBV, and 3.5% had HCV. Prior management included sorafenib (100%), TACE (30.8%), resection (12.9%). Duration of sorafenib treatment was evaluable in 99/104 patients, and reported a median of 8.7 months (range 1.8–76.6). Duration of regorafenib treatment was evaluable in 92/104 patients, and reported a median of 3.9 months (range 0.0–15.7). Following treatment with regorafenib, 6 patients (5.8%) achieved partial response, 37 (35.6%) achieved stable disease and 45 (43.3%) had progressive disease as the best response. 15 (14.4%) were not assessed and 1 (1.1%) had mixed response. Survival data is immature with 62/101 (61.4%) patients alive at the time of census with median survival currently 6.5 months. Fatigue was the most frequent AE, with 69/88 patients (85.2%) for all grades. 12/88 patients (14.8%) had Grade 3 fatigue. Other significant AEs include hand-foot syndrome (6/85 patients [7.3%] had Grade 3) and diarrhoea (4/83 patients [4.9%] had Grade 3). Conclusions: The population in our real-world experience of regorafenib for HCC had a similar duration of prior sorafenib to those in the RESORCE trial. However, there was different balance of aetiologies with a lower proportion of patients with HBV and HCV. The rate of partial response is similar to the RESORCE trial with fewer patients achieving stable disease. The incidence of fatigue was higher, but the incidence of hand-foot syndrome and diarrhoea were lower. Further expansion and follow-up of this population is warranted.

PM00104 (Zalypsis®) is a new synthetic alkaloid with potent cytotoxic activity against tumor cell lines. This phase I clinical trial determined the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) for phase II trials of PM00104 administered as a 1-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion weekly for three consecutive weeks resting every fourth week (d1,8,15 q4wk). Forty-nine patients with advanced solid malignancies received PM00104 following a toxicity-guided, accelerated, dose-escalation design. Doses evaluated ranged from 0.07 to 3.0 mg/m(2). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) appeared at the highest doses tested and comprised grade 3 diarrhea and grade 4 lipase increase at 2.0 mg/m(2); grade 1 thrombocytopenia and grade 2 neutropenia with two infusion omissions, grade 3 fatigue and grade 4 febrile neutropenia at 2.5 mg/m(2); and grade 3/4 fatigue, grade 4 neutropenia lasting5 days and grade 4 thrombocytopenia at 3.0 mg/m(2). RD was established at 2.0 mg/m(2). PM00104-related adverse events at the RD were mostly grade 1/2, with fatigue, nausea and vomiting as the most common. Transient and manageable myelosuppression and transaminase increases were also reported. Main pharmacokinetic parameters increased linearly with dose. Disease stabilization lasting ≥ 3 months was found in 4 patients with cervical carcinoma, colorectal adenocarcinoma, lachrymal adenoid carcinoma, and bladder carcinoma (n=1 each). In conclusion, PM00104 2.0 mg/m(2) 1-hour, d1,8,15 q4wk showed a positive risk-benefit ratio, which has supported its further evaluation in three ongoing phase II clinical trials.

Purpose: NRH:quinone oxidoreductase 2 (NQO2) is a homologue of NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1). Despite 54% homology with human NQO1, NQO2 has little endogenous enzymatic activity. However, NQO2 has potential as a therapeutic target because the addition of the nonbiogenic electron donor dihydronicotinamide riboside (NRH) selectively potentiates the bioactivation of the alkylating agent tretazicar (CB 1954). The NQO activity of ovarian and bladder tumors was determined and the effect of NQO polymorphisms on NQO activity was investigated. Experimental Design: Intraperitoneal ovarian metastases and bladder tumor clinical samples were analyzed for NQO1 and NQO2 activity, mRNA expression by semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR, and genotype by RFLP analysis. Results: NQO1 activity was higher in the bladder cohort than in the ovarian cohort (0-283 and 0-30 nmol/min/mg, respectively; P < 0.0001). In contrast, NQO2 activity was higher in the ovarian tissue than in the bladder samples (0.15-2.27 and 0-1.14 nmol/min/mg, respectively; P = 0.0004). In both cohorts, the NQO1 C609T single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) was associated with ∼7-fold lower NQO1 activity. The NQO2 exon 3 T14055C SNP was associated with lower NQO2 activity relative to wild-type [median values of 0.18 and 0.37 nmol/min/mg in the bladder samples (P = 0.007) and 0.82 and 1.16 nmol/min/mg in the ovarian cohort (P = 0.034)]. Conclusion: This is the first observation reporting an apparent association between an NQO2 exon 3 SNP and lower enzymatic activity. The high NQO2 activity of intraperitoneal ovarian metastases relative to other tissues indicates a potential for tretazicar therapy in the treatment of this disease. In contrast, the low level of NQO1 activity and expression relative to other tissues suggests that NQO1-directed therapies would not be appropriate.

The development of targeted therapies has changed the approach to early oncological clinical trial design. Identification of patient populations most likely to derive benefit and the biologically effective dose are now as important as determination of the maximum tolerated dose. Completion of the ‘pharmacological audit trail’ highlights drugs most likely to progress through to license, so resources can be allocated appropriately. Key to the success of this changing model is the validation/qualification of circulating biomarkers. These might provide a readily accessible and dynamic picture of drug effect, tumor response and toxicity with minimum risk to patients. This review article examines circulating biomarkers currently used in early oncological clinical trials. It considers the evidence for their employment, limitations and challenges for future development.

Introduction Lapatinib is a dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets epidermal growth factor receptor and HER2. We report on a dose-escalation study of lapatinib combined with pemetrexed in second-line treatment to evaluate the safety and efficacy in advanced or metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and an exploratory study in which circulating cell-free thymidylate synthase ribonucleic acid (cfTSmRNA) was measured in all patients and compared with clinical benefit. Patients and Methods Eligible patients had stage IIIB or IV NSCLC after 1 previous line of chemotherapy and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2. Three dose levels (DLs) of lapatinib (daily)/pemetrexed (every 21 days) were evaluated: DL0, 1250 mg/400 mg; DL1, 1250 mg/500 mg; and DL2, 1500 mg/500 mg, respectively. The primary outcome was identification of the optimal treatment regimen. Results Eighteen patients were treated (DL0: n = 4; DL1: n = 8; DL2: n = 6). The most common adverse events (any grade) were diarrhea (61%), rash (44%), nausea (33%), anemia, and fatigue (both 28%). DL1 was determined as optimal after 3 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the first cycle of DL2 (Grade 3 diarrhea and mucositis, Grade 4 lymphocytopenia); no other DLTs were observed. Partial response was detected in 4 patients. cfTSmRNA was at the limit of detection and was not measurable in all patients. Nonsignificant trends were observed, suggesting that higher levels of cfTSmRNA are associated with poorer outcome. Confirmatory studies are required. Conclusion Lapatinib and pemetrexed was well tolerated, and data suggest a similar response rate to pemetrexed monotherapy.

Background: PM00104 (Zalypsis®) is a new synthetic alkaloid related to jorumycin. Preliminary data on mechanism of action suggested DNA-binding properties acting at minor groove and effects on the cell cycle (phase S). PM00104 shows a broad spectrum of activity against solid tumors both in vitro (bladder, gastric, kidney, melanoma, pancreas, prostate, sarcoma, thyroid, leukemia and lymphoma cell lines) and in vivo (xenografts of breast, gastric, prostate, and renal tumor). Methods: Patients (n=49) with metastatic or advanced solid tumors were enrolled in a phase I, open-label, dose-escalating clinical and pharmacokinetic study of PM00104 administered weekly resting every fourth week, intravenously, over 1 hour. The starting dose was 0.75 mg/m2 and the study followed an accelerated escalation design from 0.75 to 3.037 mg/m2 distributed in 9 dose levels Results: Median age of patients (pts) was 58 (range, 22–76 y), 29 pts were males. The median ECOG was 1 (0–2). The most frequent cancer types were colorectal, gastric, esophageal and melanoma tumors (n=15/5/4/4). Most patients were heavily pretreated with a median of 3 (1–9) prior lines. A median of 2 cycles of Zalypsis (1–8) were given to each pt. Common mild (G1–2) toxicities were asthenia, anorexia, nausea/emesis, stomatitis, weight decreased, headache and hypotension. The highest dose achieved was 3.035 mg/m2, where 2 pts had DLTs: one had G4 asthenia and G3 nausea, and the other had G4 neutropenia and thrombopenia. At the next lowest level (2.5 mg/m2) 3 pts had DLTs (G3 asthenia and nausea in one pt; febrile neutropenia, G4 thrombopenia and G3 anemia in one pt, and G1 neutropenia and thrombopenia that resulted in two skipped doses in the third pt). Thus, this dose level was declared the MTD. The RD was 2 mg/m2, at which 24 pts were treated and only one pt had DLT (G4 asymptomatic lipase increase). Preliminary PK data showed a relatively prolonged half-life (up to 60 h, with a median value at the RD of 21 h), a wide distribution and high inter-patient variability. Efficacy data showed prolonged stabilization > 3 months in 12 pts, mostly with gastrointestinal tumors (colon, pancreas, esophageal and gastroesophageal junction, n=1 each) Conclusions: PM00104 shows acceptable safety and tolerability profile and prolonged stabilization (SD ≥3 months) in different tumor types. DLTs were manageable hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities. The RD for phase II studies is 2 mg/m2 weekly. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(12 Suppl):B149.

646 Background: As demonstrated in the primary analysis of NET-02, nal-IRI/5-FU/folinic acid, but not docetaxel, met the primary endpoint of 6 month (mo) progression-free survival (PFS) rate in pts with progressive PD-EP-NEC. Here, the final results are presented. Methods: This was a multi-centre, randomised (1:1), phase II trial of IV nal-IRI (70mg/m2 free base)/5-FU (2400 mg/m2)/folinic acid, Q14 days (ARM A), or IV docetaxel (75mg/m2), Q21 days (ARM B), as 2L therapy in pts with progressive PD-EP-NEC, aimed at selecting a treatment for continuation to a phase III trial. On disease progression, pts in both arms could receive further systemic treatment as recommended by their physicians. Primary endpoint was 6 mo PFS rate; 80% power to demonstrate the one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) of the 6 mo PFS rate excluded 15%, if the true rate was ≥30% (required level of efficacy); a rate of

4005 Background: The prognosis for pts with PD-EP-NEC is poor. A recognised first-line (1L) treatment for advanced disease is etoposide/platinum-based chemotherapy; there is no standard second-line (2L) treatment (area of unmet need). Methods: This was a multi-centre, randomised (1:1), phase II trial of IV nal-IRI (70mg/m2 free base)/5-FU (2400 mg/m2)/folinic acid, Q14 days (ARM A), or IV docetaxel (75mg/m2), Q21 days (ARM B), as 2L therapy in a planned 102 pts with progressive PD-EP-NEC, aimed at selecting a treatment for continuation to a phase III trial. Pts with histologically-confirmed PD-EP-NEC (Ki-67>20%; Grade 3, WHO 2019), who had prior 1L platinum-based chemotherapy and radiological disease progression or discontinuation of 1L therapy due to intolerance, with an ECOG performance status ≤2 were eligible. Randomisation was stratified by Ki-67, ECOG PS, presence of liver metastases, and response to previous platinum-based therapy. Primary endpoint was 6 month (mo) progression-free survival (PFS) rate; 80% power to demonstrate the one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) of the 6 mo PFS rate excluded 15%, if the true rate was at least 30%, where 30% was the required level of efficacy; a rate of