Search

BACKGROUND OR PURPOSE We report our single-center experience with percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and primary hemostasis disorders (HD). METHODS Consecutive patients with primary HD who underwent a percutaneous LAAC were included. Baseline characteristics, procedural data, and clinical outcomes were prospectively collected and compared with the overall LAAC cohort without HD. RESULTS Since 2013, among 229 LAAC, 17 patients (7%) had a primary HD: thrombocytopenia (n = 5), myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 6), von Willebrand syndrome (n = 4), type A hemophilia (n = 1), and dysfibrinogenemia (n = 1). The HD population's age ranged from 61 to 87 years, and the median CHA2DS2VASc was 5. Periprocedural plasmatic management was required in 47% of patients. The immediate LAAC implantation success rate was 100%. Patients received a direct oral anticoagulant (DOA) (n = 9), dual antiplatelet (n = 6), aspirin (n = 1), or no therapy (n = 1) during the first six postoperative weeks, followed with single antiplatelet (n = 16) or no therapy (n = 1) during lifelong. After 20 months, the technical success rate and procedural success rate were 100% and 94%. Zero device-/procedure-related complication and only one life-threatening bleeding occurred. Compared to patients without HD (n = 212), a baseline history of bleeding was less frequent (53% vs 91%, p

Atrial fibrillation is a chronic, progressive disorder, and persistent forms of atrial fibrillation are associated with increased risks of thromboembolism and heart failure. Catheter ablation as initial therapy may modify the pathogenic mechanism of atrial fibrillation and alter progression to persistent atrial fibrillation.We report the 3-year follow-up of patients with paroxysmal, untreated atrial fibrillation who were enrolled in a trial in which they had been randomly assigned to undergo initial rhythm-control therapy with cryoballoon ablation or to receive antiarrhythmic drug therapy. All the patients had implantable loop recorders placed at the time of trial entry, and evaluation was conducted by means of downloaded daily recordings and in-person visits every 6 months. Data regarding the first episode of persistent atrial fibrillation (lasting ≥7 days or lasting 48 hours to 7 days but requiring cardioversion for termination), recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia (defined as atrial fibrillation, flutter, or tachycardia lasting ≥30 seconds), the burden of atrial fibrillation (percentage of time in atrial fibrillation), quality-of-life metrics, health care utilization, and safety were collected.A total of 303 patients were enrolled, with 154 patients assigned to undergo initial rhythm-control therapy with cryoballoon ablation and 149 assigned to receive antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Over 36 months of follow-up, 3 patients (1.9%) in the ablation group had an episode of persistent atrial fibrillation, as compared with 11 patients (7.4%) in the antiarrhythmic drug group (hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09 to 0.70). Recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia occurred in 87 patients in the ablation group (56.5%) and in 115 in the antiarrhythmic drug group (77.2%) (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.67). The median percentage of time in atrial fibrillation was 0.00% (interquartile range, 0.00 to 0.12) in the ablation group and 0.24% (interquartile range, 0.01 to 0.94) in the antiarrhythmic drug group. At 3 years, 8 patients (5.2%) in the ablation group and 25 (16.8%) in the antiarrhythmic drug group had been hospitalized (relative risk, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.66). Serious adverse events occurred in 7 patients (4.5%) in the ablation group and in 15 (10.1%) in the antiarrhythmic drug group.Initial treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with catheter cryoballoon ablation was associated with a lower incidence of persistent atrial fibrillation or recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia over 3 years of follow-up than initial use of antiarrhythmic drugs. (Funded by the Cardiac Arrhythmia Network of Canada and others; EARLY-AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02825979.).

Twiddler syndrome is an uncommon yet dangerous phenomenon usually resulting in lead displacement with loss of capture of cardiac implantable electronic devices. In this case report, we present an interesting case of Twiddler syndrome without lead dislodgment which was detected by an alert triggered by an increase in impedance on remote monitoring.

Background Guidelines recommend a trial of one or more antiarrhythmic drugs before catheter ablation is considered in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, first-line ablation may be...

Introduction: Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative to oral anticoagulants (OAC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and contraindication to long-term OAC. Combined strategy with percutaneous LAAC at the same time of other cardiac structural or electrophysiological procedures has emerged as an alternative to a staged strategy. Aim: To describe our experience with combined LAAC procedures using Watchman™ devices. Methods: All patients with combined LAAC procedures using Watchman™ (WN) devices performed from 2016 to 2021 were included. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of periprocedural complications and adverse events during the follow-up. The primary efficacy endpoint included strokes, systemic embolisms, major bleeding and cardiovascular death. Results: From 2016, among 160 patients who underwent LAAC using WN devices, 19 underwent a combined strategy: 7 transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEMVR) (37%), 6 typical atrial flutter ablation (31%), 2 leadless pacemaker (LP) implantation (10%) and 4 AF ablation (22%). The WN device was successfully implanted in 98% and 100% of cases for single and combined LAAC procedures, respectively (p = 0.63). Median follow-up was 13 months (IQR 25/75 3/24). Device-related complications occurred in 6 out of 141 patients (4%) who underwent single LAAC and in no (0/19) patient in the combined LAAC procedure (p = ns). The procedural-related complications did not differ significantly between groups (5% vs. 10%, respectively, in the single and combined group, p = 0.1). Conclusion: Combined procedure using the Watchman™ devices and one other structural or electrophysiological procedure appears safe and effective. Larger series are needed to confirm these results.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) frequently coexist and can be challenging to treat. Pharmacologically based rhythm control of AF has not proven to be superior to rate control. Ablation-based rhythm control was compared with rate control to evaluate if clinical outcomes in patients with HF and AF could be improved. Methods: This was a multicenter, open-label trial with blinded outcome evaluation using a central adjudication committee. Patients with high-burden paroxysmal (>4 episodes in 6 months) or persistent (duration Results: From December 1, 2011, to January 20, 2018, 411 patients were randomly assigned to ablation-based rhythm control (n=214) or rate control (n=197). The primary outcome occurred in 50 (23.4%) patients in the ablation-based rhythm-control group and 64 (32.5%) patients in the rate-control group (hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.49–1.03]; P =0.066). Left ventricular ejection fraction increased in the ablation-based group (10.1±1.2% versus 3.8±1.2%, P =0.017), 6-minute walk distance improved (44.9±9.1 m versus 27.5±9.7 m, P =0.025), and NT-proBNP demonstrated a decrease (mean change –77.1% versus –39.2%, P P =0.0036), as did the AF Effect on Quality of Life score (least-squares mean difference of 6.2 [95% CI, 1.7–10.7]; P =0.0005). Serious adverse events were observed in 50% of patients in both treatment groups. Conclusions: In patients with high-burden AF and HF, there was no statistical difference in all-cause mortality or HF events with ablation-based rhythm control versus rate control; however, there was a nonsignificant trend for improved outcomes with ablation-based rhythm control over rate control. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01420393.

Background Monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices was highly impacted by the COVID‐19 pandemic considering the high volume of in‐person visits for regular follow‐up. Recent recommendations highlight the important role of remote monitoring to prevent exposure to the virus. This study compared remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in patients whose in‐person annual visit was substituted for a remote monitoring session with patients who were already scheduled for a remote monitoring session. Methods This was a cross‐sectional observational study of 329 consecutive patients between 20 March and 24 April 2020. Group 1 included 131 patients whose in‐person annual visit was substituted for a remote monitoring session. Group 2 included 198 patients who underwent a remote monitoring session as scheduled in their usual device follow‐up. The time interval since the last in‐person visit was 13.3 ± 3.2 months in group 1 and 5.9 ± 1.7 months in group 2 (P .99). Conclusion Remote monitoring of ICDs is useful to identify clinical events and allows physicians to treat patients appropriately during the COVID‐19 pandemic regardless of the time interval since their last in‐person visit. It reduces significantly in‐person visit for regular follow‐up.

Background: The number of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) infections is increasing due to an increased number of ICD implants, higher-risk patients, and more frequent replacement procedures, which carry a higher risk of infection. Reducing the morbidity, mortality, and cost of ICD-related infections requires an understanding of the current rate of this complication and its predictors. Methods: The Shock Implant Evaluation Trial (SIMPLE) trial randomized 2500 ICD recipients to defibrillation testing or not. Over an average of 3.1 years, patients were seen every 6 months and examined for evidence of ICD infection, which was defined as requiring device removal and/or intravenous antibiotics. Results: Within 24 months, 21 patients (0.8%) developed infection. Fourteen patients (67%) with infection presented within 30 days, 20 patients by 12 months, and only 1 patient beyond 12 months. Univariate analysis demonstrated that patients with primary electrical disorders (3 patients, P = 0.009) and those with a secondary prevention indication (13 patients, P = 0.0009) were more likely to develop infection. Among the 2.2% of patients who developed an ICD wound hematoma, 10.4% developed an infection. Among the 8.3% of patients requiring an ICD reintervention, 1.9% developed an infection. Conclusions: This cohort of ICD recipients at high-volume centres have a low risk of device-related infection. However; strategies to reduce wound hematoma and the need for ICD reintervention could further reduce the rate of infection. Résumé: Contexte: L’incidence des cas d’infection du défibrillateur cardioverteur implantable (DCI) augmente en raison du nombre accru d’implantations, de l’emploi de ces dispositifs chez des patients exposés à un risque très élevé et de l’augmentation de la fréquence des interventions de remplacement, qui sont associées à un plus grand risque d’infections. Pour parvenir à réduire la morbidité, la mortalité et les coûts associés aux infections liées à un DCI, il faut connaître la fréquence de cette complication et les facteurs qui permettent de la prédire. Méthodologie: Lors de l’essai Shock Implant Evaluation Trial (SIMPLE), 2 500 patients ayant reçu un DCI ont été répartis aléatoirement en deux groupes, l’un subissant des tests de défibrillation et l’autre, non. Sur une période de 3,1 ans en moyenne, les patients ont été vus en consultation tous les 6 mois et examinés à la recherche de signes d’infection du DCI, définie comme étant une infection exigeant le retrait du dispositif et/ou l’administration d’antibiotiques par voie intraveineuse. Résultats: Au total, 21 patients (0,8 %) ont présenté une infection dans les 24 mois suivant l’implantation. Quatorze patients (67 %) ont présenté une infection dans les 30 jours suivant l’intervention; à 12 mois, 20 patients avaient présenté une infection. Un seul patient a présenté une infection plus de 12 mois après l’intervention. Les résultats d’une analyse univariée ont démontré qu’une infection était plus probable chez les patients qui présentaient un trouble électrique primaire (3 patients, p = 0,009) et chez ceux qui avaient reçu un dispositif en prévention secondaire (13 patients, p = 0,0009). Parmi les patients qui présentaient un hématome après l’implantation du DCI (2,2 %), 10,4 % ont présenté une infection. Parmi les patients qui ont eu besoin d’une nouvelle intervention relative au DCI (8,3 %), 1,9 % ont présenté une infection. Conclusions: Les patients de cette cohorte ayant reçu un DCI dans des établissements à haut volume étaient exposés à un faible risque d’infection du défibrillateur. Des stratégies visant à réduire les hématomes et la nécessité d’une nouvelle intervention sur les DCI pourraient toutefois contribuer à réduire encore plus la fréquence des infections.

Current guidelines recommend 4 weeks of private driving restriction after implantation of a primary-prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). These driving restrictions result in significant inconvenience and social implications. Advances in medical treatment and ICD programming have lowered the overall rate of device therapies. The objective of this study was to assess the incidence of ICD therapies at 30, 60, and 180 days after implantation.Driving Restrictions and Early Arrhythmias in Patients Receiving a Primary-Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (DREAM-ICD) was a retrospective cohort study conducted at 2 Canadian university centres enrolling patients with new implantation of a primary-prevention ICD. Device programming was standardised according to current guidelines. A total of 803 patients were enrolled.The cumulative rates of appropriate ICD therapies at 30, 60, and 180 days were 0.12%, 0.50%, and 0.75%, respectively. There was no syncope during the first 6 months. The median duration to the first appropriate ICD therapy was 208 (range 23-1109) days after implantation. The rate of inappropriate ICD therapies at 30 days was only 0.2%. Overall,13.6% of all appropriate ICD therapies occurred within the first 6 months after implantation.The rate of appropriate ICD therapies within the first 30 days after device insertion is extremely low in contemporary primary prevention cohorts with guideline-concordant device programming. There was no increased risk for ventricular arrhythmia early after ICD insertion. The results of DREAM-ICD suggest the need for a revision of the existing driving restrictions for primary-prevention ICD recipients.

Background Despite the widespread use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to guide structural cardiac interventions, studies evaluating safety in this context are lacking. Objectives This study sought to determine the incidence, types of complications, and factors associated with esophageal or gastric lesions following TEE manipulation during structural cardiac interventions. Methods This was a prospective study including 50 patients undergoing structural cardiac interventions in which TEE played a central role in guiding the procedure (mitral and tricuspid valve repair, left atrial appendage closure, and paravalvular leak closure). An esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was performed before and immediately after the procedure to look for new injuries that might have arisen during the course of the intervention. Patients were divided in 2 cohorts according to the type of injury: complex lesions (intramural hematoma, mucosal laceration) and minor lesions (petechiae, ecchymosis). The factors associated with an increased risk of complications were assessed. Results Post-procedural EGD showed a new injury in 86% (n = 43 of 50) of patients, with complex lesions accounting for 40% (n = 20 of 50) of cases. Patients with complex lesions presented more frequently with an abnormal baseline EGD (70% vs. 37%; p = 0.04) and had a higher incidence of post-procedural dysphagia or odynophagia (40% vs. 10%; p = 0.02). Independent factors associated with an increased risk of complex lesions were a longer procedural time under TEE manipulation (for each 10-min increment in imaging time, odds ratio: 1.27; 95% confidence interval: 1.01 to 1.59) and poor or suboptimal image quality (odds ratio: 4.93; 95% confidence interval: 1.10 to 22.02). Conclusions Most patients undergoing structural cardiac interventions showed some form of injury associated with TEE, with longer procedural time and poor or suboptimal image quality determining an increased risk. Imaging experts performing this technique should be aware of the nature of potential complications, to take the necessary precautions to prevent their occurrence and facilitate early diagnosis and treatment.

Use of intraprocedural observation and pharmacologic challenges have been proposed as means to differentiate permanent pulmonary vein (PV)-left atrial conduction block from inadequate ablation lesions.The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and clinical impact of spontaneous and adenosine-provoked reconnection using contemporary atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation technologies.The CIRCA-DOSE (Cryoballoon vs. Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: Double Short vs. Standard Exposure Duration) study enrolled 346 patients with paroxysmal AF and randomized them to contact force-guided radiofrequency ablation (CF-RF) or cryoballoon ablation. Patients underwent provocative testing with adenosine after a 20-minute observation period. All patients received an implantable cardiac monitor for arrhythmia monitoring.Spontaneous reconnection was observed in 5.4% of PVs (71/1318) during the 20-minute postprocedure observation period, and dormant conduction was elicited in 5.7% of PVs (75/1318). Both spontaneous reconnection and dormant conduction were more common after CF-RF compared to cryoballoon ablation (P = .03 and P.0001, respectively). Acute PV reconnection (spontaneous or adenosine-provoked) was associated with a significantly higher incidence of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia in the cryoballoon group (hazard ratio [HR] 2.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44-3.96; P = .0007) but not in the CF-RF group (HR 1.47; 95% CI 0.84-2.58; P = .16). In the absence of acute reconnection, the freedom from recurrent arrhythmia did not differ between groups (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.6057-1.495; P = .83).Patients without spontaneous or adenosine-provoked reconnection had better outcomes compared to those with acute PV reconnection, suggesting that efforts should be directed toward ensuring an ideal ablation lesion at the first attempt in order to achieve durable PV isolation.

Pulmonary vein isolation by catheter ablation is a class IA indication for the treatment of symptomatic, drug-refractory, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Quality of life (QoL) has been identified as a clinically meaningful endpoint but has not been comprehensively evaluated to date.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of cryoballoon ablation on long-term QoL.As part of the STOP-AF Post-Approval Study, QoL was assessed using the Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12) along with evaluation of arrhythmia-related symptoms through 36 months. A multivariate linear mixed effects regression was used to determine the association between atrial fibrillation symptoms and QoL scores, and univariate linear regressions were used to assess predictors of 36-month change in QoL scores.Three hundred thirty-five subjects fully completed SF-12 forms at baseline, with 319, 308, 291, and 278 subjects completing surveys at the subsequent follow-up visits. Both physical and mental composite scores increased significantly from baseline (P.001), and all arrhythmia symptoms significantly decreased from baseline (P.001), with 62.0% of subjects reporting no symptoms at 6 months compared to 5.7% at baseline (P.001). Presence of dyspnea and fatigue at baseline were univariate predictors of physical QoL improvement (P = .045 and 0.0497, respectively), whereas each year of age and each year of PAF duration were predictors of a decrease in mental QoL (P = .014 and .04, respectively).Cryoballoon ablation for treatment of PAF results in a significant, and sustained, QoL improvement. The observed improvement in physical and mental health likely may be mediated by a reduction in symptom and arrhythmia burden.

BACKGROUND Direct-acting oral anticoagulant use for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation is limited by bleeding concerns. Asundexian, a novel, oral small molecule activated coagulation factor XIa (FXIa) inhibitor, might reduce thrombosis with minimal effect on haemostasis. We aimed to determine the optimal dose of asundexian and to compare the incidence of bleeding with that of apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS In this randomised, double-blind, phase 2 dose-finding study, we compared asundexian 20 mg or 50 mg once daily with apixaban 5 mg twice daily in patients aged 45 years or older with atrial fibrillation, a CHA2DS2-VASc score of at least 2 if male or at least 3 if female, and increased bleeding risk. The study was conducted at 93 sites in 14 countries, including 12 European countries, Canada, and Japan. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to a treatment group using an interactive web response system, with randomisation stratified by whether patients were receiving a direct-acting oral anticoagulant before the study start. Masking was achieved using a double-dummy design, with participants receiving both the assigned treatment and a placebo that resembled the non-assigned treatment. The primary endpoint was the composite of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria, assessed in all patients who took at least one dose of study medication. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04218266, and EudraCT, 2019-002365-35. FINDINGS Between Jan 30, 2020, and June 21, 2021, 862 patients were enrolled. 755 patients were randomly assigned to treatment. Two patients (assigned to asundexian 20 mg) never took any study medication, resulting in 753 patients being included in the analysis (249 received asundexian 20 mg, 254 received asundexian 50 g, and 250 received apixaban). The mean age of participants was 73·7 years (SD 8·3), 309 (41%) were women, 216 (29%) had chronic kidney disease, and mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3·9 (1·3). Asundexian 20 mg resulted in 81% inhibition of FXIa activity at trough concentrations and 90% inhibition at peak concentrations; asundexian 50 mg resulted in 92% inhibition at trough concentrations and 94% inhibition at peak concentrations. Ratios of incidence proportions for the primary endpoint were 0·50 (90% CI 0·14-1·68) for asundexian 20 mg (three events), 0·16 (0·01-0·99) for asundexian 50 mg (one event), and 0·33 (0·09-0·97) for pooled asundexian (four events) versus apixaban (six events). The rate of any adverse event occurring was similar in the three treatment groups: 118 (47%) with asundexian 20 mg, 120 (47%) with asundexian 50 mg, and 122 (49%) with apixaban. INTERPRETATION The FXIa inhibitor asundexian at doses of 20 mg and 50 mg once daily resulted in lower rates of bleeding compared with standard dosing of apixaban, with near-complete in-vivo FXIa inhibition, in patients with atrial fibrillation. FUNDING Bayer.

Background: Regulatory authorities of most industrialized countries recommend 6 months of private driving restriction after implantation of a secondary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). These driving restrictions result in significant inconvenience and social implications. This study aimed to assess the incidence rate of appropriate device therapies in contemporary recipients of a secondary prevention ICD. Methods: This retrospective study at 3 Canadian tertiary care centers enrolled consecutive patients with new secondary prevention ICD implants between 2016 and 2020. Results: For a median of 760 days (324, 1190 days), 721 patients were followed up. The risk of recurrent ventricular arrhythmia was highest during the first 3 months after device insertion (34.4%) and decreased over time (10.6% between 3 and 6 months, 11.7% between 6 and 12 months). The corresponding incidence rate per 100 patient-days was 0.48 (95% CI, 0.35–0.64) at 90 days, 0.28 (95% CI, 0.17–0.45) at 180 days, and 0.21 (95% CI, 0.13–0.33) between 181 and 365 days after ICD insertion ( P P Conclusions: The incidence rate of appropriate therapies resulting in sudden cardiac incapacitation in contemporary recipients of a secondary prevention ICD is much lower than previously reported and declines significantly after the first 3 months. Lowering driving restrictions to 3 months after the index cardiac event seems safe, and revision of existing guidelines should be considered in countries still adhering to a 6-month period. Existing restrictions for private driving after implantation of a secondary prevention ICD should be reconsidered.

Introduction: Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative to oral anticoagulant (OAC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and contraindication to long-term OAC. Combined strategy with percutaneous LAAC at the same time of other cardiac structural or electrophysiological procedure has emerged as an alternative to staged strategy. Aim: To describe our experience of combined LAAC procedures using Watchman™ devices. Method: All patients with combined LAAC procedure using Watchman™ (WN) devices performed from 2016-2021 were included. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of periprocedural complications and adverse events during follow-up. The primary efficacy endpoint included strokes, systemic embolisms, major bleeding, and cardiovascular death. Results: Since 2016, among the 157 patients who underwent LAAC using WN devices, 16 underwent a combined strategy: 6 TEMVR (37%), 6 typical atrial flutter ablation (37%), 2 LP implantation (13%) and 2 atrial fibrillation ablation (13%). The WN device was successfully implanted in 98% and 100% for single and combined LAAC respectively (p = 0.63). Median follow-up was 13 months (IQR 25/75 3/24) in the whole cohort. Device related complications occurred in 6 out of 141 patients (4%) who underwent single LAAC and in no (0/16) patient in the combined LAAC procedure (p=ns). The procedural related complications did not differ significantly between groups (5% vs 12%, respectively in the single and combined group, p=0.1). Conclusion: Combined procedure combining LAAC using the Watchman™ devices and one other structural or electrophysiological procedure is safe and effective. Larger series are needed to confirm these results.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are recommended for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death and were first implanted more than 40 years ago. The addition of cardiac resynchronization improved outcomes in the heart failure population and is now an important part of optimized therapy for this population. In this review, we will address patient selection, risk stratification, and outcomes after ICD placement and technological improvements. Gender disparities in referral and outcomes will be discussed. Far from early technologies with limited pacing capabilities and no antitachycardia pacing (ATP), we have now moved to complex devices with the addition of ATP/ATP during charging, cardiac resynchronization therapy, remote monitoring, and improved battery longevity. The requirement for defibrillation testing at time of implantation has changed and in most implants are not required as part of new clinical guidelines. As the components most likely to fail are the leads, and many complications arise from the intravascular components, extravascular ICDs were developed, the subcutaneous ICD is now an option for many patients, and substernal devices are under clinical trials. Because shocks are associated with worse outcomes, optimized ICD programming is now recommended, with the benefit of reducing appropriate and inappropriate shocks with a decrease in mortality and no increase in the syncopal events. All these improvements will have a positive effect on patient outcomes and quality of life, and new technologies will be developed in the future.

IMPORTANCE: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have impaired health-related quality of life primarily owing to symptoms related to AF episodes; however, quality of life can be influenced by AF therapies, AF complications, the frequency of follow-up visits and hospitalizations, illness perceptions, and patient factors, such as anxiety or depression. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between change in AF burden and quality of life in the year following ablation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The current study is a secondary analysis of a prospective, parallel-group, multicenter, single-masked randomized clinical trial (Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: Double Short vs Standard Exposure Duration [CIRCA-DOSE] study), which took place at 8 Canadian centers. Between September 2014 and July 2017, 346 patients older than 18 years with symptomatic, primarily low-burden AF refractory to antiarrhythmic therapy referred for first catheter ablation were enrolled. All patients received an implantable cardiac monitor at least 30 days before ablation and were followed up with up to December 2018. Data were analyzed from April 2020 to June 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to contact force–guided radiofrequency ablation, 4-minute cryoballoon ablation, or 2-minute cryoballoon ablation. The exposure in the present analysis is the absolute difference in AF burden prior to ablation and 12 months following ablation, as evaluated by the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT) Score. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Absolute difference in quality of life from baseline to 12 months postablation. RESULTS: Of 346 included patients, 231 (66.7%) were male, and the median (interquartile range) age was 60 (52-66) years. A total of 328 patients (94.8%) had paroxysmal AF. The median (interquartile range) preablation AF burden was 2.0% (0.1-11.9), and the AF burden decreased to 0% at 12 months postablation. At 12 months, a 1-point improvement in AFEQT score was observed for every absolute reduction in daily AF burden of 15.8 minutes (95% CI, 7.2-24.4; P

Background: Advanced generation ablation technologies have been developed to achieve more effective pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and minimize arrhythmia recurrence after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Methods: We randomly assigned 346 patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF to contact force–guided radiofrequency ablation (CF-RF; n=115), 4-minute cryoballoon ablation (Cryo-4; n=115), or 2-minute cryoballoon ablation (Cryo-2; n=116). Follow-up was 12 months. The primary outcome was time to first documented recurrence of symptomatic or asymptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmia (AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia) between days 91 and 365 after ablation or a repeat ablation procedure at any time. Secondary end points included freedom from symptomatic arrhythmia and AF burden. All patients received an implantable loop recorder. Results: One-year freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia defined by continuous rhythm monitoring was 53.9%, 52.2%, and 51.7% with CF-RF, Cryo-4, and Cryo-2, respectively ( P =0.87). One-year freedom from symptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmia defined by continuous rhythm monitoring was 79.1%, 78.2%, and 73.3% with CF-RF, Cryo-4, and Cryo-2, respectively ( P =0.26). Compared with the monitoring period before ablation, AF burden was reduced by a median of 99.3% (interquartile range, 67.8%–100.0%) with CF-RF, 99.9% (interquartile range, 65.3%–100.0%) with Cryo-4, and 98.4% (interquartile range, 56.2%–100.0%) with Cryo-2 ( P =0.36). Serious adverse events occurred in 3 patients (2.6%) in the CF-RF group, 6 patients (5.3%) in the Cryo-4 group, and 7 patients (6.0%) in the Cryo-2 group, with no significant difference between groups ( P =0.24). The CF-RF group had a significantly longer procedure duration but significantly shorter fluoroscopy exposure ( P Conclusions: In this multicenter, randomized, single-blinded trial, CF-RF and 2 different regimens of cryoballoon ablation resulted in no difference in 1-year efficacy, which was 53% by time to first recurrence but >98% burden reduction as assessed by continuous cardiac rhythm monitoring. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01913522.

Objectives STOP AF PAS (Sustained Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Post-Approval Study) is the first prospective, multicenter, 3-year study in North America to assess long-term safety and effectiveness of the cryoballoon for treatment of patients with drug-refractory symptomatic pAF. Background The STOP AF PAS was required by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration at the time of approval of the first-generation cryoballoon for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF). The second-generation cryoballoon (CB2) was commercially released shortly after this trial was initiated. Methods The study was nonrandomized. Enrollment was completed with 344 eligible patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the CB2. Procedure-related safety and freedom from AF and symptomatic atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia through 3 years were determined. Documented atrial arrhythmias ≥30 s were considered treatment failures. Results Acute PVI was achieved in 99.3% (1,341 of 1,350) of veins. Mean follow-up was 34 ± 7 months. The rate of major complications was 5.8%, including a 3.2% rate of phrenic nerve injury, which resolved in all but 1 patient by 36 months. At 36 months, 11.7% of patients were prescribed antiarrhythmic agents, inclusive of “pill-in-the-pocket” administration. Freedom from AF was 81.6% at 12 months, 73.8% at 24 months, and 68.1% at 36 months. Freedom from AF and symptomatic atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia was 79.0% at 12 months, 70.8% at 24 months, and 64.1% at 36 months. Freedom from a repeat ablation procedure was 80.9% at 36 months. Conclusions PVI using the CB2 was an effective treatment for patients with pAF, with freedom from all atrial arrhythmias of 64% at 36 months. (Sustained Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Post-Approval Study [STOP AF PAS]; NCT01456949)

Aims: Data on predictors of time-to-first appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with Brugada Syndrome (BrS) and prophylactically implanted ICD's are scarce.Methods and results: SABRUS (Survey on Arrhythmic Events in BRUgada Syndrome) is an international survey on 678 BrS patients who experienced arrhythmic event (AE) including 252 patients in whom AE occurred after prophylactic ICD implantation. Analysis was performed on time-to-first appropriate ICD discharge regarding patients' characteristics. Multivariate logistic regression models were utilized to identify which parameters predicted time to arrhythmia ≤5 years. The median time-to-first appropriate ICD therapy was 24.8 ± 2.8 months. A shorter time was observed in patients from Asian ethnicity (P Conclusion: First appropriate therapy in BrS patients with prophylactic ICD's occurred during the first 5 years in 76.6% of patients. Syncope and spontaneous Type 1 Brugada ECG correlated with a shorter time to ICD therapy.

BACKGROUND We report our single center experience with percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and primary hemostasis disorders (HD). In randomized percutaneous LAAC trials, this HD population is under-represented. METHODS AND RESULTS Consecutive patients with primary HD who underwent LAAC were included. Baseline procedural characteristics and clinical events during follow-up were prospectively collected. From 2013 to 2021, 205 patients underwent percutaneous LAAC and 17 (8.2%) had proven HD: thrombocytopenia (n=5), myelodysplastic syndrome (n=6), Von Willebrand syndrome (n=4), type A hemophilia (n=1) and dysfibrinogenemia (n=1). Median age was 78 YO, CHA2DS2VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 5 and 3, respectively. Periprocedural plasmatic management was required in 47% of patients. The LAAC device implantation was successful in all cases. Post-procedural antithrombotic regimen for the first six weeks consisted of reduced direct oral anticoagulant (DOA) in 8 patients, full dose DOA in 1, dual-antiplatelet in 6, aspirin in 1 and no therapy in 1. The transesophageal echocardiography, 45 days post-procedure, showed optimal device position, adequate sealing in all patients and no clots. After this initial period post-LAAC the long-term antithrombotic regimen was single-antiplatelet in 16 patients and no therapy in 1 patient. After a median follow-up of 1.0 year (25-75 IQR: 0.4-2.2), no thrombo-embolic or bleeding events occurred. CONCLUSION The percutaneous LAAC in patients with atrial fibrillation and primary hemostasis disorders appeared to be a safe and effective alternative for stroke and bleeding prevention at mid-term follow-up. These promising results warrant larger studies to confirm our experience.

Early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ERAT) is common after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and has been associated with an increased risk of late atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence.The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and outcomes of patients experiencing ERAT after PVI using advanced-generation ablation technologies.This is a prespecified substudy of the CIRCA-DOSE (Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: Double-Short vs Standard Exposure Duration) trial, a prospective, randomized, multicenter study comparing PVI with contact force-guided radiofrequency ablation to secondary-generation cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal AF. All study patients received an implantable cardiac monitor to allow continuous rhythm monitoring. ERAT was defined as any recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia within the first 90 days after AF ablation.ERAT occurred in 61% of the 346 patients at a median of 12 days (range 1-90 days) after ablation. ERAF was a significant predictor of late recurrence (60.1% with ER vs 25.9% without ER; P.001) and symptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmia (31.6% with ERAF vs 6.7% without ERAF; P.001). Receiver operating curve analyses revealed a strong correlation between ERAT timing and burden and late recurrence. Multivariate analysis identified ER timing (hazard ratio [HR] 2.90; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41-5.95; P = .004) and burden (HR 1.05 per 1% ER burden; 95% CI 1.04-1.07; P.001) as strong independent predictors of late recurrence. Incidence rate, timing, burden, and prognostic significance of ER did not differ between the study groups.ERAT remains common after PVI despite use of advanced-generation ablation technologies. Early AF recurrence beyond 3 weeks after ablation is associated with increased risk of late recurrence.

Objectives: We aimed to report a single center experience with percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and blood dyscrasia (BD). Background: Although strong data supports the LAAC, patients with coagulopathy and BD were under-represented in randomized trials. Methods: Consecutive patients with BD who underwent LAAC were included. Baseline and procedural characteristics and follow-up outcomes were prospectively collected. Results: From 2013 to 2020, 180 patients underwent LAAC and 14 (7.8%) had proven BD: thrombocytopenia (n=5), myelodysplastic syndrome (n=5), Von Willebrand syndrome (n=2), type A hemophilia (n=1) and dysfibrinogenemia (n=1). Median age was 78 YO, CHA2DS2VASc and HAS-BLED scores were respectively 4 and 3. Periprocedural plasmatic management was required in 50% of the patients. The WATCHMANTM, AMPLATZER CARDIAC PLUGTM and CARDIA ULTRASTEALTM devices were used in 12, 1 and 1 patients, respectively, and the procedure was successful in all cases. Post-procedural antithrombotic regimen for the first six weeks consisted of reduced direct anticoagulant (DOA) in 7 patients, dual-antiplatelet in 5, aspirin in 1 and no therapy in 1. Following that period, single-antiplatelet was used in 13 patients and no therapy in 1 patient. A transesophageal echocardiography 45 days post-procedure showed optimal device position and sealing in all patients. After a median follow-up of 1.4 years, no thrombo-embolic or bleeding events occurred. Conclusion: LAAC in patients with BD appeared to be a safe and effective alternative for stroke and bleeding prevention at mid-term follow-up. These promising results warrants larger studies to confirm our findings.

Background In patients undergoing left atrial appendage (LAA) closure, an accurate sizing of the LAA is key to optimize device sizing, procedural success and reduce complications. Previous studies have shown that intraprocedural volume loading increases LAA dimensions and improves device sizing. However, the safety and effects on LAA and device sizing of administering a fluid bolus during pre-procedural transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and impact on LAA dimensions and device sizing of an intravenous (IV) fluid bolus administered during TEE in the setting of the pre-procedural work-up for LAA closure. Methods The study included a total of 72 patients who underwent TEE to assess suitability for LAAC and received a 500 ml IV bolus of normal saline. The LAA landing zone (LZ) and depth were measured by TEE before and after volume loading, and these measurements were used to predict the device size implanted during a subsequent percutaneous LAAC procedure. Results There were no complications associated with volume loading. The baseline mean LZ was 19.6 ± 3.6 mm at 90o, and 20.2 ± 4.1 mm at 135o. Following fluid bolus, the maximum diameter increased 1.5 ± 1.0 mm at 90o (po (po, and 23.9 ± 5.8 mm at 135o. After fluid bolus, the mean depth increased by 1.5 ± 1.8 mm (ppo and 135o, respectively. Sizing based on post-bolus measurements of the LZ significantly improved the agreement with the final device size selection during the procedure in 71.0% of cases (vs. 42.0% with pre-bolus measurements). Conclusions Volume loading during ambulatory TEE as part of the pre-procedural work-up of LAAC is safe and significantly increases LAA dimensions. This strategy may become the new standard, particularly in centers performing LAAC with no TEE guidance, as it improves LAA sizing and more accurately predicts the final device size.

Introduction: Implantation of epicardial pacing leads remains a well-known alternative to the standard transvenous approach in several situations. However, long-term data on the performance and safety of epicardial pacing leads remain scarce. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a single tertiary center including all patients with right or left ventricular epicardial lead implantation between 1996 to 2018; n=255. Electrophysiological lead parameters at implantation and during follow-up were analyzed and compared with clinical data from the electronic medical records. Results: 230 patients were included in the analysis. Implanted lead models included the Medtronic 4968 (n=202) and Medtronic 5071 (n=28). Indications for epicardial lead implantation included upgrade to CRT in 153/230 (67%) individuals and standard right or left ventricular pacing only in 76/230 (33%). Of the 153 epicardial CRT patients, 50 had a history of failed transvenous CRT and 103 had concomitant cardiac surgery for other indications and were thought to have a likely indication for CRT in the nearby future. Mean follow-up time was 4,7years±4,2. Lead impedances were significantly higher in the 4968 model compared to the 5071. Pacing thresholds for both lead models were similar at implantation but were subsequently significant higher in the 5071 model. Higher pacing thresholds in the 5071 model did not result in premature battery depletion. Periprocedural complications related to the epicardial lead insertion occurred in 3/230 patients. Epicardial lead related complications at follow-up remained low (8/230; 3 dysfunctions, 2 dislodgments, 1 impending skin erosion). There were only 2 cases of epicardial lead infections at follow-up requiring surgical extraction. 4,3% of all implanted leads remained unconnected at follow-up. Conclusions: Epicardial lead implantation for either CRT or pacing indications is a durable and safe alternative to transvenous lead insertion.

Background: Apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (aHCM) is thought to have a more benign clinical course compared to septal HCM (sHCM), but most data have been derived from Asian cohorts. Comparative data on clinical outcome in Caucasian aHCM cohorts are scarce, and the results are conflicting. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence and outcome of aHCM in French-Canadians of Caucasian descent.Methods and results: We conducted a retrospective, single-center cohort study. The primary endpoint was a composite of documented sustained ventricular arrhythmia (VA), appropriate ICD therapy, arrhythmogenic syncope, cardiac arrest, or all-cause mortality. A total of 301 HCM patients (65% males) were enrolled including 80/301 (27%) with aHCM and 221/301 (73%) with sHCM. Maximal wall thickness was similar in both groups. Left ventricular apical aneurysm was significantly more common in aHCM (10 vs. 0.5%; p < 0.001). The proportion of patients with myocardial fibrosis ≥ 15% of the left ventricular mass was similar between aHCM and sHCM (21 vs. 24%; p = 0.68). Secondary prevention ICDs were more often implanted in aHCM patients (16 vs. 7%; p = 0.02). The primary endpoint occurred in 26% of aHCM and 10.4% of sHCM patients (p = 0.001) and was driven by an increased incidence of sustained VA (10 vs. 2.3%; p = 0.01). Multivariate analysis identified apical aneurysm and a phenotype of aHCM as independent predictors of the primary endpoint and the occurrence of sustained ventricular tachycardia. Unexplained syncope and a family history of sudden cardiac death were additional predictors for sustained VA. Apical HCM was associated with an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia even when excluding patients with apical aneurysm.Conclusions: The phenotype of apical HCM is much more common in French-Canadians (27%) of Caucasian descent compared to other Caucasian HCM populations. Apical HCM in French-Canadians is associated with an increased risk for ventricular arrhythmia.

NEW FINDINGS What is the role of SCN5A-C683R? SCN5A-C683R is a novel variant associated with an uncommon phenotype of adrenaline-triggered ventricular arrhythmia in the absence of a distinct ECG phenotype. What is the main finding and its importance? Functional studies demonstrated that NaV 1.5/C683R results in a mixed electrophysiological phenotype with gain-of-function (GOF) and loss-of-function (LOF) properties compared with NaV 1.5/wild type. Gain-of-function properties are characterized by a significant increase of the maximal current density and a hyperpolarizing shift of the steady-state activation. The LOF effect of NaV 1.5/C683R is characterized by increased closed-state inactivation. Electrophysiological properties and clinical manifestation of SCN5A-C683R are different from long-QT-3 or Brugada syndrome and might represent a distinct inherited arrhythmia syndrome. ABSTRACT Mutations of SCN5Ahave been identified as the genetic substrate of various inherited arrhythmia syndromes, including long-QT-3 and Brugada syndrome. We recently identified a novel SCN5A variant (C683R) in two genetically unrelated families. The index patients of both families experienced adrenaline-triggered ventricular arrhythmia with cardiac arrest but did not show a specific ECG phenotype, raising the hypothesis that SCN5A-C683R might be a susceptibility variant and the genetic substrate of distinct inherited arrhythmia. We conducted functional cellular studies to characterize the electrophysiological properties of NaV 1.5/C683R in order to explore the potential pathogenicity of this novel variant. The C683R variant was engineered by site-directed mutagenesis. NaV 1.5/wild type (WT) and NaV 1.5/C683R were expressed in tsA201 cells. Electrophysiological characterization of C683R was performed using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique. Adrenergic stimulation was mimicked by exposure to the protein kinase A activator 8-CPT-cAMP. The impact of β-blockers was tested by exposing NaV 1.5/WT and NaV 1.5/C683R currents to propranolol and nadolol. C683R resulted in a co-association of gain-of-function and loss-of-function properties of NaV 1.5. Gain-of-function properties were characterized by a significant increase of the maximal NaV 1.5 current density compared with NaV 1.5/WT (861 ± 309 vs. 627 ± 489 pA/pF; P

Background Concerns remain regarding the effectiveness of PVI using the fixed diameter non-compliant cryoballoon in the presence of a left common pulmonary vein (LCPV). We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of PVI performed by contact-force guided radiofrequency (CF-RF) versus second-generation cryoballoon-based ablation in patients with LCPV. Methods and results We enrolled 346 patients with paroxysmal AF and randomized them to CF-RF or cryoballoon ablation. PV anatomy was not assessed prior to enrolment, and there were no exclusions based on PV anatomy. All patients received an implantable cardiac monitor. LCPV was observed in 13.6% of patients (47/346). Left atrial time and fluoroscopy time did not differ between those with and without LCPV (P=0.58 and P=0.06, respectively). Freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia at one year was observed in 46.8% with LCPV and 54.5% without LCPV (P=0.06). In those with LCPV the freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia did not differ between those randomized to CF-RF or cryoballoon ablation (HR for recurrence 1.19, 95% CI 0.53-2.65, P=0.69). In those with LCPV the AF burden was reduced to a similar extent with CF-RF and cryoballoon ablation (99.7% vs. 99.5%, respectively; P=0.97). Conclusions In this randomized clinical trial, the presence of a LCPV was associated with a trend towards higher rates of arrhythmia recurrence following PVI. No significant difference in arrhythmia recurrence was observed between patients with LCPV randomized to cryoballoon ablation or contact-force guided RF ablation, suggesting that either ablation modality is suitable in this population. (Cryoballoon vs. Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation [CIRCA-DOSE], NCT01913522) This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of catheter ablation to treat patients with symptomatic drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (AF).The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of PVI using the cryoballoon catheter to treat patients with persistent AF.STOP Persistent AF (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03012841) was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, Food and Drug Administration-regulated trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PVI-only cryoballoon ablation for drug-refractory persistent AF (continuous episodes6 months). The primary efficacy endpoint was 12-month freedom from ≥30 seconds of AF, atrial flutter (AFL), or atrial tachycardia (AT) after a 90-day blanking period. The prespecified performance goals were set at40% and13% for the primary efficacy and safety endpoints, respectively. Secondary endpoints assessed quality of life using the AFEQT (Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life) and SF (Short Form)-12 questionnaires.Of 186 total enrollments, 165 subjects (70% male; age 65 ± 9 years; left atrial diameter 4.2 ± 0.6 cm; body mass index 31 ± 6) were treated at 25 sites in the United States, Canada, and Japan. Total procedural, left atrial dwell, and fluoroscopy times were 121 ± 46 minutes, 102 ± 41 minutes, and 19 ± 16 minutes, respectively. At 12 months, the primary efficacy endpoint was 54.8% (95% confidence [CI] 46.7%-62.1%) freedom from AF, AFL, or AT. There was 1 primary safety event, translating to a rate of 0.6% (95% CI 0.1%-4.4%). AFEQT and SF-12 assessments demonstrated significant improvements from baseline to 12 months postablation (P.001).The STOP Persistent AF trial demonstrated cryoballoon ablation to be safe and effective in treating patients with drug-refractory persistent AF characterized by continuous AF episodes6 months.