Search

Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide (VIP) interacts with a high affinity to two subclasses of G protein coupled receptors named VPAC(1) and VPAC(2), and has a 3 - 10 fold preference for VPAC(1) over VPAC(2) receptors. Selective ligands for each receptor subclass were recently described. [R(16)]-PACAP (1 - 23) and [L(22)]-VIP are two selective VPAC(1) agonists. Chimaeric human VPAC(2)-VPAC(1) recombinant receptors expressed in CHO cells were used to identify the receptor domains implicated in these two selective ligands recognition. The VPAC(2) preference for [R(16)]-PACAP (1 - 27) over [R(16)]-PACAP (1 - 23) did not require the receptor's NH(2)-terminus domain but involved the whole transmembrane domain. In contrast, the selectivity of [L(22)]-VIP depended only on the presence of the NH(2) terminus and EC(2) domains of the VPAC(1) receptor. The present data support the idea that in the GPCR-B family of receptors the different selective ligands require different domains for their selectivity, and that the peptides carboxyl terminal sequence (amino acids 24 - 27) folds back on the transmembrane receptor domain, close to the peptides, aminoterminus.

In order to identify the receptor domains responsible for the VPAC1 selectivity of the VIP1 agonist, [Lys15, Arg16, Leu27] VIP (1-7)/GRF (8-27) and VIP1 antagonist, Ac His1 [D-Phe2, Lys15, Arg16, Leu27] VIP (3-7)/GRF (8-27), we evaluated their binding and functional properties on chimeric VPAC1/VPAC2 receptors. Our results suggest that the N-terminal extracellular domain is responsible for the selectivity of the VIP1 antagonist. Selective recognition of the VIP1 agonist was supported by a larger receptor area: in addition to the N-terminal domain, the first extracellular loop, as well as additional determinants in the distal part of the VPAC1 receptor were involved. Furthermore, these additional domains were critical for an efficient receptor activation, as replacement of EC1 in VPAC1 by its counter part in the VPAC2 receptor markedly reduced the maximal response.

Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) acts through interaction with two subclasses of seven transmembrane G protein-coupled receptors named VIP1 and VIP2 receptors. These receptors have been cloned in different species, such as rat and human. Considering the different distribution of both receptor subclasses, there is considerable interest in the development of selective agonists and antagonists. The present study compares the binding properties of VIP, PACAP, GRF, secretin, and helodermin analogues on recombinant rat and human VIP1 and VIP2 receptors. On both rat and human receptors, secretin and GRF had a higher affinity for the VIP1 receptor subtypes. The amino-shortened VIP, and the carboxy terminal-shortened VIP and PACAP analogues also presented a higher affinity for the VIP1 receptor. PHI, PHV, helodermin, and helospectin were selective for the human VIP2 receptor subtypes. These results suggest that the helical structure of the carboxy terminal end is necessary for VIP2 recognition. The differences between species were the following: PHI, PHV, helodermin, and helospectin had a higher affinity for the rat VIP1 receptor than for the human VIP1 receptor. On both rat and human receptors, D-Ala4 VIP and D-Phe4 VIP had a high affinity for the VIP1 receptor and a low affinity for the VIP2 receptor. Thus, three domains of the ligand involved in VIP1/VIP2 receptor discrimination were identified: the amino acid residue in position 4 ([D-Ala4], [D-Phe4]VIP), in positions 8 and 9 (the effects of helodermin and helospectin), and the carboxy terminal end (the effects of the shortened VIP and pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide analogues).

The capacity of brain tumor samples to synthesize pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP) was evaluated by the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction technique (RT-PCR). The expression of PACAP receptors was assessed by a combination of RT-PCR techniques, conventional binding techniques, and also by the ability of PACAP to stimulate adenylate cyclase activity. A weak PACAP mRNA and PACAP receptor mRNA expression was detected in only 3 of 16 meningiomas. A weak PACAP-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity (+20%) was detected in 10 of the 16 samples but binding of labeled PACAP was never observed. In the 16 gliomas studied (including two oligodendrogliomas and two ependymomas), PACAP mRNA was identified in 13 samples and PACAP receptor mRNA in 15 samples. PACAP receptors were identified in all the samples by binding studies and/or by PACAP stimulation of the adenylate cyclase activity. PACAP mRNA was never detected in pituitary adenomas (three prolactinomas, two mixed PRL-GH-producing tumors, three GH-secreting tumors, three gonadotrophinomas, one ACTH-producing tumor, two nonsecreting tumors) whereas PACAP receptor mRNA was highly expressed in all the tumors except prolactinomas, where it was at the limit of detection, confirming the binding and adenylate cyclase activation results. Thus, it is unlikely that the neuropeptide PACAP could influence meningioma's cell growth; PACAP secreted from extratumoral areas may influence pituitary tumors and PACAP could participate to gliomas development.

In pineal gland, melatonin is synthesized in pinealocytes. Pharmacological studies using calmodulin antagonists suggested that melatonin synthesis was regulated through calmodulin. However, immunohistochemical studies showed that calmodulin could only be detected in pineal glial cells, and not in pinealocytes. To further investigate this discrepancy, we have tried to detect calmodulin not seen by immunohistochemical methods. We have used rat and chicken pineal homogenate supernatants and Triton X-100-treated pellets denatured by sodium dodecyl sulfate, subjected to electrophoresis and immunoblotting using anti-calmodulin antibodies. Two different IgG (#465 and #860) purified from anti-calmodulin sera were used. In rat pineal homogenate supernatants, calmodulin could be detected by immunoblotting using both antibodies. Some calmodulin could also be detected in the Triton-treated pellet fractions, but no additional cross-reacting bands were detected. However, in both chicken pineal homogenate supernatants and Triton-extracted pellets, in addition to a calmodulin immunoreactive band, two other proteins with approximate molecular masses (M(r)) of 56 kDa and 60 kDa were detected using anti-calmodulin #465. For comparison, similar immunoblot experiments were performed for detection of calbindin-D28K and calretinin, two other calcium binding proteins expressed in different pineal cell populations. Interestingly, Triton extraction of chicken pineal pellets revealed additional bands cross-reacting with each antibody. Anti-calbindin-D28K cross-reacted strongly with a M(r) = 68 kDa protein and weakly with a M(r) = 56 kDa protein. Anti-calretinin cross-reacted strongly with a M(r) = 93 kDa protein and weakly with a M(r) = 56 kDa protein.

Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) is a prominent neuropeptide whose actions are mediated by VPAC receptors belonging to class II G protein-coupled receptors. To identify contact sites between VIP and its VPAC1 receptor, an analog of VIP substituted with a photoreactive para-benzoyl-l-Phe (Bpa) at position 22 has been synthesized and evaluated in Chinese hamster ovary cells stably expressing the recombinant human receptor. Bpa22-VIP and native VIP are equipotent in stimulating adenylyl cyclase activity in cell membranes. Cyanogen bromide cleavage of the covalent 125I-[Bpa22-VIP]-hVPAC1R complex yielded a single labeled fragment of 30 kDa that shifted to 11 after deglycosylation, most consistent with the 67–137 fragment of the receptor N-terminal ectodomain. Further cleavage of this fragment with V8 endoproteinase and creation of receptor mutants with new CNBr cleavage sites (XaMet), demonstrated that 125I-[Bpa22-VIP] was covalently attached to the short receptor 109–120 fragment (GWTHLEPGPYPI). In a three-dimensional model of the receptor N-terminal ectodomain, this fragment is located on one edge of the putative VIP binding groove and encompasses several amino acids previously shown to be crucial for VIP binding (reviewed in Laburthe, M., Couvineau, A., and Marie, J. C. (2002) Receptors Channels 8, 137–153). Our data provide the first direct evidence for a physical contact between VIP and the N-terminal ectodomain of the hVPAC1 receptor.

Calretinin is a cytosolic calcium-binding protein of the calmodulin superfamily, with high homology with calbindin D28k. The only cells in which calretinin has been described so far are neurons, in the central nervous system and in retina. In the present work, we describe the expression of the calretinin gene in the interstitial cells of rat ovary. Immunohistochemistry, using a calretinin-specific antibody, allowed to detect the protein from 19 days after birth. Western blot from ovary homogenates confirmed the labelling of a 29 kDa band, the size of calretinin. In situ hybridization confirmed immunochemical data; calretinin transcripts were clearly shown in the same cell population. This represents the first description of calretinin outside the nervous system. Its function in ovary remains to be determined.

We analyzed the functional and binding properties of the "normal" pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (N-PACAP) type I, PACAP type II/vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)1, and chimeric N-PACAP/VIP1 receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. The binding properties of the three receptors were investigated using three radioiodinated tracers: 125I-VIP, 125I-PACAP-27, and 125I-PACAP-29 (125I-PACAP-27-Gly28,Lys29-amide). The three tracers labeled very different receptor densities; 125I-PACAP-29 labeled more receptors than either 125I-VIP or 125I-PACAP-27 in the three cell lines. Analysis of the competition curves suggested that the three tracers labeled in a different manner three PACAP I receptor states, two PACAP II/VIP1 receptor states, and three chimeric N-PACAP/VIP1 receptor states in transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells. The previously described PACAP1A and PACAP1B receptors, which differ by their affinities for PACAP-27 and PACAP-38, actually correspond to different PACAP I receptor states. The three receptors were able to increase adenylate cyclase activity when activated by PACAP-38, PACAP-27, or VIP. In contrast with the two parent receptors, the chimeric N-PACAP/VIP1 receptor was activated by PACAP-38 at lower concentrations than PACAP-27, suggesting that the amino-terminal and core receptor domains influence each other and that the conformation of one or both domains was altered in the chimeric compared with wild-type receptors. Comparison of the binding and functional properties of three clones expressing different chimeric N-PACAP/VIP1 receptors densities indicated that 125I-PACAP-29 was necessary to correctly estimate the receptor number and that 125I-PACAP-27 or 125I-VIP labeled only a fraction of the functional receptors. We suspect (but could not demonstrate) that this might also be true for PACAP I and PACAP II/VIP1 receptors.