Search

Your search keyword '"Jeevan, Ranjeet"' showing total 38 results
Start Over Author "Jeevan, Ranjeet"
38 results on '"Jeevan, Ranjeet"'

4. Variation in the perioperative care of women undergoing abdominal-based microvascular breast reconstruction in the United Kingdom (The optiFLAPP Study)

Author

Gardiner, Matthew D., Giblin, Victoria, Highton, David, Jain, Abhilash, Jeevan, Ranjeet, Jhanji, Shaman, Kwasnicki, Richard M., Mosahebi, Afshin, Martin, Daniel, Sadideen, Hazim, Skillman, Joanna, Acquaah, Frank, Cato, Liam, Coventry, Daniel, Geoghegan, Luke, Iqbal, Fahad, Lim, Diana, McCaughey, Philip, Pancholi, Jay, Sinha, Yashashwi, Stanley, Guy, Twoon, Mark, Berry, Brendon, Borelli, Mimi, Chan, Victoria, Chauhan, Priyesh, Conci, Elena, Coulson, Rachael, Dreyer, Susan, Dynes, Kaitlyn, Evans, Esther, Gallagher, Stuart, Garner, Jessica, Kane, Tajinder, Lafford, George, Mena, Joanna, Nguyen, Uyen, Nowicka, Maria, Robinson, Daniel, Suresh, Reena, Tarassoli, Sam P., Teoh, Victoria, and Way, Benjamin

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Long-term patient-reported outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: population-based cohort study

Author

Johnson, Leigh, primary, White, Paul, additional, Jeevan, Ranjeet, additional, Browne, John, additional, Gulliver-Clarke, Carmel, additional, O’Donoghue, Joe, additional, Mohiuddin, Syed, additional, Hollingworth, William, additional, Fairbrother, Patricia, additional, MacKenzie, Mairead, additional, Holcombe, Chris, additional, and Potter, Shelley, additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

11. Abstract PD15-10: PD15-10 Impact of procedure type on long-term revisional surgery and secondary reconstruction following immediate breast reconstruction: The UK Brighter national population-based cohort study

Author

Johnson, Leigh, primary, White, Paul, additional, Jeevan, Ranjeet, additional, Browne, John, additional, Gulliver-Clarke, Carmel, additional, O’Donoghue, Joe, additional, Mohiuddin, Syed, additional, Hollingworth, William, additional, Fairbrother, Patricia, additional, MacKenzie, Mairead, additional, Holcombe, Chris, additional, and Potter, Shelley, additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

12. Abstract PD15-09: PD15-09 Impact of procedure type on the long-term patient-reported outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction: The UK Brighter Study

Author

Johnson, Leigh, primary, White, Paul, additional, Jeevan, Ranjeet, additional, Browne, John, additional, Gulliver-Clarke, Carmel, additional, O’Donoghue, Joe, additional, Mohiuddin, Syed, additional, Hollingworth, William, additional, Fairbrother, Patricia, additional, MacKenzie, Mairead, additional, Holcombe, Chris, additional, and Potter, Shelley, additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

13. Abstract P2-15-03: Impact of radiotherapy on the long-term patient-reported outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction: The UK Brighter

Author

Johnson, Leigh, primary, White, Paul, additional, Jeevan, Ranjeet, additional, Browne, John, additional, Gulliver-Clarke, Carmel, additional, O’Donoghue, Joe, additional, Mohiuddin, Syed, additional, Hollingworth, William, additional, Fairbrother, Patricia, additional, MacKenzie, Mairead, additional, Holcombe, Chris, additional, and Potter, Shelley, additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

14. Identifying research priorities in breast cancer surgery: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance

Author

Potter, Shelley, primary, Fairhurst, Katherine, additional, Cowan, Katherine, additional, Vincent, Simon, additional, Lewis, Ian, additional, Cutress, Ramsey I., additional, Stobart, Hilary, additional, Fairbrother, Patricia, additional, Turner, Sophia, additional, Davies-Crowley, Kayleigh, additional, Jeevan, Ranjeet, additional, Rattay, Tim, additional, O’Connell, Rachel, additional, Bundred, Nigel, additional, and McIntosh, Stuart A., additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

16. Impact of procedure type on revisional surgery and secondary reconstruction after immediate breast reconstruction in a population-based cohort.

Author

Johnson, Leigh, White, Paul, Holcombe, Chris, O'Donoghue, Joe, Jeevan, Ranjeet, Browne, John, Fairbrother, Patricia, MacKenzie, Mairead, Gulliver-Clarke, Carmel, Mohiuddin, Syed, Hollingworth, Will, and Potter, Shelley

Subjects
MAMMAPLASTY, FREE flaps, CARCINOMA in situ, DUCTAL carcinoma, HOSPITAL statistics, SURGERY
Abstract

Background: Women considering immediate breast reconstruction require high-quality information about the likely need for secondary reconstruction and the long-term risk of revisional surgery to make fully informed decisions about different reconstructive options. Such data are currently lacking. This study aimed to explore the impact of reconstruction type on the number of revisions and secondary reconstructions performed 3, 5, and 8 years after immediate breast reconstruction in a large population-based cohort. Methods: Women undergoing unilateral mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ in England between 1 April 2009 and 31 March 2015 were identified from National Health Service Hospital Episode Statistics. Numbers of revisions and secondary reconstructions in women undergoing primary definitive immediate breast reconstruction were compared by procedure type at 3, 5, and 8 years after index surgery. Results: Some 16 897 women underwent immediate breast reconstruction with at least 3 years' follow-up. Of these, 14 069 had a definitive reconstruction with an implant only (5193), latissimus dorsi flap with (3110) or without (2373) an implant, or abdominal free flap (3393). Women undergoing implant-only reconstruction were more likely to require revision, with 69.5 per cent (747 of 1075) undergoing at least one revision by 8 years compared with 49.3 per cent (1568 of 3180) in other reconstruction groups. They were also more likely to undergo secondary reconstruction, with the proportion of women having further reconstructive procedures increasing over time: 12.8 per cent (663 of 5193) at 3 years, 14.3 per cent (535 of 3752) at 5 years, and 17.6 per cent (189 of 1075) at 8 years. Conclusion: Long-term rates of revisions and secondary reconstructions were considerably higher after primary implant-based reconstruction than autologous procedures. These results should be shared with patients to support informed decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

18. Long-term patient-reported outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction: Initial results from the brighter study

Author

Johnson, Leigh, primary, White, Paul, additional, Jeevan, Ranjeet, additional, Browne, John, additional, Gulliver-Clarke, Carmel, additional, O'Donoghue, Joe, additional, Mohiuddin, Syed, additional, Hollingworth, Will, additional, Fairbrother, Patricia, additional, MacKenzie, Mairead, additional, Holcombe, Chris, additional, and Potter, Shelley, additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

19. Rates of revision and secondary reconstruction procedures 8 years following immediate breast reconstruction: Results from the brighter long-term breast reconstruction outcome study

Author

Johnson, Leigh, primary, White, Paul, additional, Jeevan, Ranjeet, additional, Browne, John, additional, Gulliver-Clarke, Carmel, additional, O'Donoghue, Joe, additional, Mohiuddin, Syed, additional, Hollingworth, Will, additional, Fairbrother, Patricia, additional, MacKenzie, Mairead, additional, Holcombe, Chris, additional, and Potter, Shelley, additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

20. Protocol for a national cohort study to explore the long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes and cost-effectiveness of implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: the brighter study

Author

Johnson, Leigh, primary, Holcombe, Chris, additional, O’Donoghue, Joe M, additional, Jeevan, Ranjeet, additional, Browne, John, additional, Fairbrother, Patricia, additional, MacKenzie, Mairead, additional, Gulliver-Clarke, Carmel, additional, White, Paul, additional, Mohiuddin, Syed, additional, Hollingworth, William, additional, and Potter, Shelley, additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

26. Patients' satisfaction with the reconstructive options provided to them measured 18 months after mastectomy surgery for breast cancer.

Author

Jeevan, Ranjeet, Browne, John P., Gulliver‐Clarke, Carmel, Pereira, Jerome, Caddy, Christopher M., Meulen, Jan H. P., and Cromwell, David A.

Subjects
*MULTIPLE regression analysis, *AGE distribution, *MAMMAPLASTY, *PATIENT satisfaction, *PATIENTS' attitudes, *RESEARCH funding, *DECISION making, *CHI-squared test, *QUESTIONNAIRES, *MASTECTOMY, *DATA analysis software, *BREAST tumors
Abstract

Introduction: Mastectomy patients' satisfaction with reconstructive options has not been examined. Methods: A national study measured 18‐month satisfaction with reconstructive options and collected case‐mix and reconstructive offer and uptake data on breast cancer patients having mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction (IR) in England between January 2008 and March 2009. Multivariable logistic regression examined the relationship between satisfaction, age, IR offer and uptake, and clinical suitability. Results: Of 4796 patients, 1889 were not offered IR, 1489 declined an offer and 1418 underwent it. Women not offered IR were more likely older, obese or smokers and had higher ASA grades, ECOG scores, tumour burdens and adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy likelihoods (9% of lowest suitability group offered IR; 81% in highest suitability group). 83.7% were satisfied with their reconstructive options, varying significantly by IR offer and uptake (76.1% for those not offered IR; 85.8% for those who declined IR; 91.7% following IR). Older women and women deemed more suitable for IR were more often satisfied (p‐values <0.001). Conclusions: Satisfaction varied by offer and uptake status, age and suitability score. Clinicians should target equity for women deemed unsuitable by exploring their needs and desired outcomes, standardising operative fitness assessments and utilising shared decision‐making aids. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

38. Minimal Access Tendon Harvesting without a Harvester: A Cheap and Effective Alternative Technique Using a Plastic Yankauer Suction Tip.

Author

Asmar O, Jeevan R, and Iqbal A

Subjects
Humans, Tendons transplantation, Tissue and Organ Harvesting instrumentation, Tissue and Organ Harvesting methods
Abstract

Tendon grafting is a key component of hand reconstructive procedures. Commercially produced tendon harvesters facilitate this grafting process but are not always available. We present an innovative technique that allows tendon harvest to be undertaken using equipment readily available in all hospitals. Only a scalpel blade and a plastic Yankauer suction tip are required. Two simple and rapid modifications are made to the suction tip using the blade prior to its use. The described tool has been conceived, refined and used successfully by the authors, without complications, and allows tendon harvest via the standard minimally invasive approach associated with a conventional harvester. Creating this improvised harvester is neither challenging nor time-consuming, and this cheap and effective substitute allows tendon grafts to be harvested using a minimal access approach in environments where a traditional harvester is not available, or not sterile.

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results