Search

International audience; Autonomous navigation becomes complex when it is performed in an environment that lacks road signs and includes a variety of users, including vulnerable pedestrians. This article deals with the perception of collision risk from the viewpoint of a passenger sitting in the driver’s seat who has delegated the total control of their vehicle to an autonomous system. The proposed study is based on an experiment that used a fixed-base driving simulator. The study was conducted using a group of 20 volunteer participants. Scenarios were developed to simulate avoidance manoeuvres that involved pedestrians walking at 4.5 kph and an autonomous vehicle that was otherwise driving in a straight line at 30 kph. The main objective was to compare two systems of risk perception: These included subjective risk assessments obtained with an analogue handset provided to the participants and electrodermal activity (EDA) that was measured using skin conductance sensors. The relationship between these two types of measures, which possibly relates to the two systems of risk perception, is not unequivocally described in the literature. This experiment addresses this relationship by manipulating two factors: The time-to-collision (TTC) at the initiation of a pedestrian avoidance manoeuvre and the lateral offset left between a vehicle and a pedestrian. These manipulations of vehicle dynamics made it possible to simulate different safety margins regarding pedestrians during avoidance manoeuvres. The conditional dependencies between the two systems and the manipulated factors were studied using hybrid Bayesian networks. This relationship was inferred by selecting the best Bayesian network structure based on the Bayesian information criterion. The results demonstrate that the reduction of safety margins increases risk perception according to both types of indicators. However, the increase in subjective risk is more pronounced than the physiological response. While the indicators cannot be considered redundant, data modeling suggests that the two risk perception systems are not independent.

International audience; In autonomous cars, the automation systems assume complete operational control. In this situation, it is essential that passengers always feel comfort-able with the vehicle's decisions. In this project, we are specifically inter-ested in risk assessment by the passenger of an autonomous car navigating among pedestrians in a shared space. A driving simulator experiment was conducted with 27 participants. The challenge was twofold: on the one hand, to find a link between the pedestrians' avoidance behavior of the ve-hicle and the risk felt by the passenger; and on the other hand, to try to pre-dict this perceived risk in real time. The study revealed a significant effect of two factors on the risk assessed by the participants: (1) the value of the TTC at the moment the vehicle begins a pedestrian avoidance maneuver; (2) the lateral distance it leaves to the pedestrian. The proposed real-time pre-diction model is based on the principle of impulse response operation. This new paradigm assumes that the passenger's risk assessment is the result of a quantifiable unconscious internal phenomenon that has been estimated us-ing the dynamics of the perceived pedestrian approach. The results showed that this approach was predictive of risk for isolated avoidance maneuvers, but was insufficient to explain the variability in the risk assessment behav-ior of the participants.