Search

Introduction Tourette syndrome (TS) is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by chronic motor and vocal tics. While consistently effective treatment is lacking, evidence indicates that the modulation of endocannabinoid system is potentially beneficial. Lu AG06466 (previously ABX-1431) is a highly selective inhibitor of monoacylglycerol lipase, the primary enzyme responsible for the degradation of the endocannabinoid ligand 2-arachidonoylglycerol. This exploratory study aimed to determine the effect of Lu AG06466 versus placebo on tics and other symptoms in patients with TS. Methods In this phase 1b cross-over study, 20 adult patients with TS on standard-of-care medications were randomized to a single fasted dose of Lu AG06466 (40 mg) or placebo in period 1, followed by the other treatment in period 2. The effects on tics, premonitory urges, and psychiatric comorbidities were evaluated using a variety of scaled approaches at different time points before and after treatment. Results All scales showed an overall trend of tic reduction, with two out of three tic scales (including the Total Tic Score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Score) showing a significant effect of a single dose of Lu AG06466 versus placebo at various timepoints. Treatment with Lu AG06466 resulted in a significant reduction in premonitory urges versus placebo. Single doses of Lu AG06466 were generally well-tolerated, and the most common adverse events were headache, somnolence, and fatigue. Conclusion In this exploratory trial, a single dose of Lu AG06466 showed statistically significant positive effects on key measures of TS symptoms.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND Evidence supports use of adjunctive atypical antipsychotics in major depressive disorder (MDD). Impaired sexual functioning is common in MDD and may be worsened by antipsychotic adverse effects. We evaluated the effect of brexpiprazole on prolactin and sexual functioning in patients with MDD. METHODS/PROCEDURES In short-term studies, patients received adjunctive brexpiprazole 1, 2, or 3 mg or placebo. The long-term study was a flexible-dose (0.5-3 mg/d) open-label extension (OLE). Change from baseline and shifts in prolactin status and prolactin-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed. Sexual functioning was assessed by the Massachusetts General Hospital Sexual Functioning Questionnaire. FINDINGS/RESULTS Median changes in prolactin levels from baseline to week 6 in short-term studies were as follows: brexpiprazole, 5.99 ng/mL (females) and 1.61 ng/mL (males); placebo, -0.15 ng/mL (females) and -0.08 ng/mL (males).Median changes from baseline to week 52 in the OLE were as follows: 0.27 ng/mL (females) and 0.27 ng/mL (males). Prolactin levels in patients with baseline prolactin greater than 1× upper limit of normal values tended to decrease over time.The proportion of brexpiprazole-treated patients with greater than 3× upper limit of normal postbaseline prolactin values in short-term studies for both sexes was low (0%-0.3%) and did not differ from placebo: OLE, 0.5% (females) and 0.8% (males).In short-term studies, the incidence of prolactin-related TEAEs was 3.1% for brexpiprazole and 0.7% for placebo (OLE, 3.1%). There were overall numerical improvements from baseline in sexual functioning for females and males after short- and long-term brexpiprazole treatment, with statistically significant improvements for brexpiprazole versus placebo in females on the items 'interest in sex' (-0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.33 to -0.05; P = 0.0074), 'sexually aroused' (-0.17; 95% CI, -0.30 to -0.03; P = 0.0154), and 'overall sexual satisfaction' (-0.16; 95% CI, -0.30 to -0.03; P = 0.0184). IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS There were small changes in prolactin levels, low proportions of patients with postbaseline elevated prolactin values, low incidences of prolactin-related TEAEs, and modest improvements in sexual functioning with adjunctive brexpiprazole in MDD.

Background Modulation of the endocannabinoid system via monoacylglycerol lipase inhibition with Lu AG06466 (formerly known as ABX-1431) has previously been shown to reduce tics in patients with Tourette syndrome. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Lu AG06466 in reducing tics, premonitory urges, and comorbidities in patients with Tourette syndrome. Methods This was a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial of Lu AG06466 given at two dose levels in 49 adults with Tourette syndrome. Results Both treatment groups showed improvement on the Total Tic Score of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale; the mean (95% CI) treatment difference at week 8 of 3.0 (0.1, 5.9) (P = 0.043) favored placebo. No significant differences were seen for other endpoints assessing changes in tic severity, premonitory urges, quality of life, and common psychiatric comorbidities. Treatment with Lu-AG06466 was generally safe. Conclusions There was no evidence that Lu AG06466 has efficacy in suppressing tics. © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

This chapter addresses some fundamental ethical aspects of paediatric psychopharmacology research. Minors are indeed a vulnerable population. However, stating this does not suffice. Medical research has a horrible dark history, and the rights of human beings have been repetitively violated by physicians regardless of the Hippocratic Oath or ethical standards. This chapter presents a historical perspective, the Nuremberg Code, the Declaration of Geneva, the Declaration of Helsinki, and the Belmont Report. Per nature, ethics is an evolving field. With the inception of worldwide paediatric regulations evidencing a current societal shift from protecting children against clinical research to a new emerging paradigm of protecting children through clinical research, more research is anticipated. Therefore taking into account that each paediatric research is different and unique, our objective is to bring a conceptual perspective rather than provide an ethical checklist. Additionally, specific considerations on paediatric psychopharmacology will be discussed.

This chapter addresses safety aspects in paediatric psychopharmacology researches. It provides overall perspective on the monitoring of safety and tolerability in clinical studies in children, along with more specific considerations on clinical trials within psychopharmacology. A lack or insufficient and underpowered clinical studies in children has been a well-recognised issue for decades, resulting in limited and inadequate safety information provided in product information/labelling. Over the last decades, there was a gradual shift in the overall clinical and regulatory landscape, with more paediatric studies being conducted and more efficacy and safety data generated in systematic manner. However, due to specificity and vulnerability of this population, there are still multiple challenges related to methodology to be applied to adequately address safety and tolerability aspects in clinical studies in children. The list is composed of but not limited to small sample size, slow recruitment rate, collection and assessment of safety data, and difficulties to detect safety issues in children, including long-term safety and effects on development and maturation.

Background Hyperprolactinemia is an undesirable effect of most antipsychotics because of D2-receptor blockade. We assessed the effect of the D2-receptor partial agonist brexpiprazole on prolactin, based on pooled data from three 6-week, randomized, placebo-controlled studies and two open-label extension studies in patients with schizophrenia. Methods In the short-term studies, patients received 0.25, 1, 2, 4 mg brexpiprazole or placebo; or flexible-dose brexpiprazole (2-4 mg/d), placebo, or active reference. The extension studies were 52-week, flexible-dose (1-4 mg/d) studies. We studied changes from baseline and shifts in prolactin status in patients with normal or elevated prolactin levels at baseline, and prolactin-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results Median changes from baseline to week 6 in brexpiprazole-treated patients in short-term studies were as follows: 3.63 ng/mL (females), 0.26 ng/mL (males); placebo: -2.15 ng/mL (females), -1.08 ng/mL (males).Median changes from baseline to week 52 in long-term studies were 0.60 ng/mL (females) and 0.18 ng/mL (males). Prolactin levels in patients with baseline values greater than 1× upper limit of normal tended to decrease over time regardless of previous treatment.The proportions of brexpiprazole-treated patients with greater than 3× upper limit of normal postbaseline prolactin values in short-term studies were as follows: 1.5% (females), 1.6% (males); placebo: 3.6% (females), 3.4% (males). Corresponding figures in long-term studies were 5.3% (females) and 2.0% (males).In short-term studies, the incidence of prolactin-related TEAEs was 1.8% for brexpiprazole and 0.6% for placebo. In long-term studies, the incidence of prolactin-related TEAEs was 1.7%. Conclusions Small changes in prolactin levels, low proportions of patients with postbaseline elevated prolactin values, and low incidence of prolactin-related TEAEs were observed after treatment with brexpiprazole.

Objective: To assess the 1-year safety profile of the dopaminergic stabilizer pridopidine in patients with Huntington disease. Methods: Patients received pridopidine 45 mg/day for 4 weeks then pridopidine 90 mg/day for 22 weeks in this 6-month open-label extension (OLE) of the 6-month MermaiHD randomized controlled trial (RCT). Any adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Patients were categorized by their RCT treatment group (placebo, pridopidine 45 mg/day, pridopidine 90 mg/day). Results: Of the 386 patients who completed the RCT, 353 entered the OLE and 305 (86.4%) completed. In 1 year, similar percentages of patients from each group reported ≥1 AE (placebo, 79.6% [n = 90/113]; 45 mg/day, 80.8% [n = 101/125]; 90 mg/day, 82.6% [n = 95/115]) and ≥1 serious AE (8.0% [n = 9/113], 12.8% [n = 16/125], and 8.7% [n = 10/115], respectively). The AE profile across both studies was similar; falls and worsening of chorea were most commonly reported. During the OLE, more patients previously receiving pridopidine reported ≥1 AE (67.9% [n = 163/240]) than those who had received placebo (56.6% [n = 64/113]). Early in the RCT, small increases in heart rate were reported in patients receiving pridopidine. During 1 year, no clinically meaningful changes in laboratory parameters or EKG-related safety concerns were identified. Conclusion: Pridopidine (≤90 mg/day) has an acceptable safety profile and is well-tolerated for 1 year. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that pridopidine (≤90 mg/day) is generally safe and well-tolerated in patients with Huntington disease for up to 1 year.