Search

TEAEs and TRAEs occurring in pts with intracranial disease

LIBRETTO-001 Trial Profile

Purpose:The RET proto-oncogene encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase that is activated by gene fusion in 1%–2% of non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and rarely in other cancer types. Selpercatinib is a highly selective RET kinase inhibitor that has recently been approved by the FDA in lung and thyroid cancers with activating RET gene fusions and mutations. Molecular mechanisms of acquired resistance to selpercatinib are poorly understood.Patients and Methods:We studied patients treated on the first-in-human clinical trial of selpercatinib (NCT03157129) who were found to have MET amplification associated with resistance to selpercatinib. We validated MET activation as a targetable mediator of resistance to RET-directed therapy, and combined selpercatinib with the MET/ALK/ROS1 inhibitor crizotinib in a series of single patient protocols (SPP).Results:MET amplification was identified in posttreatment biopsies in 4 patients with RET fusion–positive NSCLC treated with selpercatinib. In at least one case, MET amplification was clearly evident prior to therapy with selpercatinib. We demonstrate that increased MET expression in RET fusion–positive tumor cells causes resistance to selpercatinib, and this can be overcome by combining selpercatinib with crizotinib. Using SPPs, selpercatinib with crizotinib were given together generating anecdotal evidence of clinical activity and tolerability, with one response lasting 10 months.Conclusions:Through the use of SPPs, we were able to offer combination therapy targeting MET-amplified resistance identified on the first-in-human study of selpercatinib. These data suggest that MET dependence is a recurring and potentially targetable mechanism of resistance to selective RET inhibition in advanced NSCLC.

Supplementary Methods

Supplemental Figure 2

Purpose:We report the intracranial efficacy of selpercatinib, a highly potent and selective RET inhibitor, approved in the United States for RET fusion-positive non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLC).Patients and Methods:In the global phase 1/2 LIBRETTO-001 trial (NCT03157128) in advanced RET-altered solid tumors, selpercatinib was dosed orally (160 mg twice every day) in 28-day cycles. Patients with baseline intracranial metastases had MRI/CT scans every 8 weeks for 1 year (12 weeks thereafter). In this pre-planned analysis of patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC with baseline intracranial metastases, the primary endpoint was independently assessed intracranial objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included intracranial disease control rate, intracranial duration of response, and intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) independently reviewed.Results:Eighty patients with NSCLC had brain metastases at baseline. Patients were heavily pretreated (median = 2 systemic therapies, range = 0–10); 56% of patients received ≥1 course of intracranial radiation (14% whole brain radiotherapy, 45% stereotactic radiosurgery). Among 22 patients with measurable intracranial disease at baseline, intracranial ORR was 82% [95% confidence interval (CI), 60–95], including 23% with complete responses. Among all intracranial responders (measurable and nonmeasurable, n = 38), median duration of intracranial response was not reached (95% CI, 9.3–NE) at a median duration of follow-up of 9.5 months (IQR = 5.7, 12.0). At 12 months, 55% of intracranial responses were ongoing. In all 80 patients, median intracranial PFS was 13.7 months (95% CI, 10.9–NE) at a median duration of follow-up of 11.0 months (IQR = 7.4, 16.5). No new safety signals were revealed in patients with brain metastases compared with the full NSCLC trial population.Conclusions:Selpercatinib has robust and durable intracranial efficacy in patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC.

LIBRETTO-001 Investigators List

Background Abnormal liver function is a common manifestation of human disease and may also occur in approved and investigational medications as drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Capillary blood collection devices may allow for more frequent and convenient measurement outside of the clinic. Validation of such approaches is lacking. Methods This prospective, biospecimens collection study evaluated the Tasso+ in patients with abnormal liver tests (NCT05259618). The primary objective was to define the concordance of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) obtained via Tasso+ compared to standard venipuncture. Secondary objectives included measurement of 14 other analytes and patient surveys. At the time of venipuncture, 2 Tasso+ samples were collected: one was centrifuged and shipped, and the other was refrigerated and shipped as whole blood. Results Thirty-six patients with elevated ALT values were enrolled. In total, 100 venipuncture, 50 Tasso+ centrifuged, and 48 Tasso+ whole blood samples were obtained. Tasso+ centrifuged samples demonstrated concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) of >0.99 for ALT, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and total bilirubin and CCC >0.95 for albumin, chloride, enzymatic creatinine, serum glucose, magnesium, and phosphorus. Tasso+ whole blood showed CCC of >0.99 for AST, bilirubin total, and enzymatic creatinine and CCC >0.95 for ALT, ALP, albumin, magnesium, and phosphorus. Hemolysis was comparable across the 3 sample types, but its impact was reflected in the Tasso+ potassium data. Patient feedback indicated a very favorable patient experience. Conclusions The capillary blood collection device, Tasso+, showed substantial to almost perfect concordance to standard venipuncture for measurement of abnormal liver function. Studies are ongoing to validate longitudinal sampling outside of the clinic. Clinicaltrials.gov Registration Number: NCT05259618

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has been found to increase the risk/severity of immune-mediated adverse events with subsequent kinase inhibitor treatment in oncogenically driven cancers. We explored the risk for hypersensitivity with selpercatinib, a first-in-class highly selective and potent, central nervous system-active RET inhibitor, in prior ICI-treated patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC compared with their ICI-naive counterparts.Data from patients enrolled by December 16, 2019, in the ongoing phase 1/2 LIBRETTO-001 (NCT03157128) trial were analyzed for hypersensitivity reactions reported using preferred terms of hypersensitivity/drug hypersensitivity and defined as a constellation of symptoms/findings characterized by maculopapular rash, often preceded by fever with arthralgias/myalgias, followed by greater than or equal to 1 of the following signs/symptoms: thrombocytopenia, increased aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase, hypotension, tachycardia, or increased creatinine.Of 329 patients, 22 (7%) who experienced a grade 1 to 3 hypersensitivity reaction that met the defined constellation of events were attributed to selpercatinib by investigators, and more often in prior ICI-treated (n = 17, 77%) than ICI-naive (n = 5, 23%) patients. There were 19 patients with selpercatinib-related hypersensitivity who resumed selpercatinib post-hypersensitivity with dose modification/supportive care. Furthermore, 17 patients, of whom 14 received prior ICI therapy, were still on treatment at twice daily doses of 40 mg (n = 5), 80 mg (n = 4), 120 mg (n = 4), and 160 mg (n = 4).Rates of selpercatinib-related hypersensitivity were low overall and, as with other kinase inhibitors, occurred predominantly in prior ICI-treated patients. Hypersensitivity to selpercatinib can be managed with supportive care measures regardless of prior ICI status and is reversible.

Background: Covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) have transformed the management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), but patients (pts) discontinue these agents due to resistance or intolerance. Pirtobrutinib is an oral, highly selective, non-covalent (reversible) BTKi with promising efficacy and safety in heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL pts, regardless of BTK C481 mutation status. Recent clinical studies reported on the safety and efficacy of time-limited venetoclax and covalent BTKi combination regimens. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of pirtobrutinib combined with venetoclax ± rituximab in pts with R/R CLL. Methods: BRUIN is a phase 1/2 global, multicenter study (NCT03740529) of pirtobrutinib in pts with advanced B-cell malignancies. The phase 1b portion evaluated the safety of pirtobrutinib at a continuous dose of 200 mg QD from Cycle 1, Day 1 plus venetoclax starting on Cycle 2, Day 1 with a standard 5-week dose ramp to 400 mg QD (PV) and PV plus rituximab at 375 mg/m2 on Cycle 1, Day 1, then 500 mg/m2 on Day 1 of Cycles 2-6 (PVR). Prior BTKi was allowed; prior venetoclax was not permitted. Objectives included safety and overall response rate (ORR) of each combination. Results: As of 27 SEP 2021, 15 pts received PV and 10 pts received PVR. Median age was 66 years (range, 39-78). Median prior lines of therapy was 2 (range, 1-4). The majority of pts in both cohorts had received prior chemotherapy (56%, n=14), CD20 monoclonal antibody (72%, n=18), and/or covalent BTKi (68%, n=17). No dose-limiting toxicities were reported. Safety profiles were generally similar across both cohorts. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) of any grade, regardless of attribution, were neutrophil count decrease (36%), nausea (32%), fatigue (32%), diarrhea (28%), and constipation (24%). The only Grade ≥3 TEAE to occur in more than 2 pts was neutrophil count decrease (36%, n=9). One pt experienced Grade 4 clinical tumor lysis syndrome with resultant acute kidney injury during venetoclax dose escalation, which resolved with supportive measures. No pts discontinued treatment due to AEs. For the 22 pts with efficacy data available as of 03 NOV 2021, median duration of follow-up was 9 months (range, 3.9-15) and the ORR was 95.5% (95% CI, 77-100). All responding pts except 1 remain on therapy (PVR responder discontinued due to death unrelated to study treatment). As all responses were ongoing and early, and MRD analysis was not yet performed. Conclusions: Pirtobrutinib combined with venetoclax ± rituximab was well tolerated and had a safety profile consistent with known drug class findings and no clear additive toxicities in pts with R/R CLL. Early results demonstrate promising efficacy with combination therapy. Citation Format: Lindsey E. Roeker, Anthony R. Mato, Jennifer R. Brown, Catherine C. Coombs, Nirav N. Shah, William G. Wierda, Manish R. Patel, Katharine L. Lewis, Minna Balbas, Junjie Zhao, Nora C. Ku, Jennifer F. Kherani, Donald E. Tsai, Binoj Nair, Chan Y. Cheah. Pirtobrutinib, a highly selective, non-covalent (reversible) BTK inhibitor in combination with venetoclax ± rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Results from the BRUIN phase 1b study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT138.

Objectives There is an overall paucity of literature on the radiologic education of emergency medicine (EM) clinicians. Given the fact that many EM clinicians preliminarily review images for their patients, we hypothesized that a brief imaging curriculum could be efficacious in teaching basic and relevant radiologic interpretation. Methods We designed a 4-hour “radiology boot camp” for a group of 20 EM residents (from all years of training) covering several subject specific e-learning modules. They completed precourse and postcourse quizzes to evaluate the efficacy of these modules. These modules included interactive PowerPoint-based tutorials, games, and imaging decision support simulators. Matched results from the pre- and posttests were analyzed using paired t test. An additional questionnaire was administered to the EM residents to evaluate their perception of the educational experience. Results The precourse and postcourse quizzes demonstrated a statistically significant level of improved knowledge due to the educational modules (p

Background Multiple measures of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have been described, but there has been limited study of the comparability of these assays. We sought to determine the reproducibility of and correlation between alternative EPC assay methodologies. Methods We simultaneously assessed EPC numbers in 140 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization using the 2 most commonly used culture techniques: endothelial cell outgrowth and colony-forming unit (CFU). In the final 77 patients, EPCs were also identified on the basis of cell surface marker expression (CD133, CD34, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 [VEGFR-2]) and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity. Results Endothelial progenitor cell enumeration based on fluorescence activated cell sorting was more precise than culture assays. There was limited correlation between EPC numbers determined using the 2 common culture-based assays; however, endothelial CFUs correlated with VEGFR-2 and CD34/VEGFR-2–expressing cells. Endothelial progenitor cells defined by expression of CD133, CD34, CD133/CD34, and ALDH activity correlated with each other, but not with VEGFR-2 + cells. Conclusions Endothelial progenitor cells can be broadly classified into 2 classes: VEGFR-2–expressing cells, which give rise to endothelial CFUs, and CD133/CD34 or ALDH br cells. These observations underscore the need for better assay standardization and a more precise definition of EPCs in cell therapy research.