Search

VAF concordance

Supplementary Data file including supplementary methods and clinical case vignettes.

Reasons for not using recommended targeted therapy.

Patient sequencing data, by patient number and diagnosis.

Infections cause substantial morbidity for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Therefore, accurate characterization of infectious adverse events (AEs) reported on clinical trials is imperative to defining, comparing, and managing safety and toxicity. Here, we describe key processes implemented to improve reporting of infectious AEs on two active phase III Children's Oncology Group (COG) ALL trials. Processes include: (a) identifying infections as a targeted toxicity, (b) incorporation of infection-specific case report form questions, and (c) physician review of AEs with real-time data cleaning. Preliminary assessment of these processes suggests improved reporting, as well as opportunities for further improvement.

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia have improved outcomes when treated with pediatric-inspired regimens. CALGB 10403 was the largest prospective study to evaluate the feasibility of using a pediatric regimen in AYAs with acute lymphoblastic leukemia up to 40 years of age. This article presents the toxicity events observed in the CALGB 10403 study and compares these toxicities vs those observed among AYAs treated on the same arm of the companion Children’s Oncology Group (COG) AALL0232 study. Toxicities in CALGB 10403 were similar to those observed in COG AALL0232. Some grade 3 to 4 adverse events were more often reported in CALGB 10403 compared with COG AALL0232 (hyperglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, transaminase elevation, and febrile neutropenia). Adverse events correlated with body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 and some with increasing age. The mortality rate in CALGB 10403 was low (4%) and similar to that in the COG AALL0232 trial. A caveat to this analysis is that only 39% of CALGB 10403 patients completed all planned protocol treatment. In COG AALL0232, although 74% of patients aged

PURPOSE To identify effective and less toxic therapy for children with acute myeloid leukemia, we introduced clofarabine into the first course of remission induction to reduce exposure to daunorubicin and etoposide. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 2008 through 2017, 285 patients were enrolled at eight centers; 262 were randomly assigned to receive clofarabine and cytarabine (Clo+AraC, n = 129) or high-dose cytarabine, daunorubicin, and etoposide (HD-ADE, n = 133) as induction I. Induction II consisted of low-dose ADE given alone or combined with sorafenib or vorinostat. Consolidation therapy comprised two or three additional courses of chemotherapy or hematopoietic cell transplantation. Genetic abnormalities and the level of minimal residual disease (MRD) at day 22 of initial remission induction determined final risk classification. The primary end point was MRD at day 22. RESULTS Complete remission was induced after two courses of therapy in 263 (92.3%) of the 285 patients; induction failures included four early deaths and 15 cases of resistant leukemia. Day 22 MRD was positive in 57 of 121 randomly assigned evaluable patients (47%) who received Clo+AraC and 42 of 121 patients (35%) who received HD-ADE (odds ratio, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.03 to 3.41; P = .04). Despite this result, the 3-year event-free survival rate (52.9% [44.6% to 62.8%] for Clo+AraC v 52.4% [44.0% to 62.4%] for HD-ADE, P = .94) and overall survival rate (74.8% [67.1% to 83.3%] for Clo+AraC v 64.6% [56.2% to 74.2%] for HD-ADE, P = .1) did not differ significantly across the two arms. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that the use of clofarabine with cytarabine during remission induction might reduce the need for anthracycline and etoposide in pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia and may reduce rates of cardiomyopathy and treatment-related cancer.

The treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is one of the success stories of pediatric oncology, but challenges and questions remain, including the optimal approach to the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) leukemia. It is unclear why some children with ALL develop CNS leukemia and others do not, and there remains debate regarding optimal regimens for prophylaxis, upfront treatment, and the treatment of CNS relapses. These topics are especially important since both cranial radiation therapy (CRT) and intensive intrathecal therapy carry risks of both short- and long-term adverse effects. In this review, we aim to identify areas of ongoing debate on this topic, review the biology of CNS leukemia, and summarize clinical trial data that address some of these questions.Both retrospective and meta-analyses have demonstrated that few patients with ALL benefit from CRT as a component of CNS-directed treatment for de novo disease, allowing cooperative groups to greatly limit the number of patients undergoing CRT as part of their initial ALL regimens. More recent efforts are focusing on how best to assay for low levels of CNS disease at the time of diagnosis, as well as the biological drivers that may result in CNS leukemia in certain patients. Progress remains to be made in the identification and treatment of CNS leukemia in pediatric ALL. Advancements have occurred to limit the number of children undergoing CRT, but much has yet to be learned to better understand the biology of and risk factors for CNS leukemia, and novel approaches are required to approach CNS relapse of ALL.

Despite a remarkable increase in the genomic profiling of cancer, integration of genomic discoveries into clinical care has lagged behind. We report the feasibility of rapid identification of targetable mutations in 153 pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory or high-risk leukemias enrolled on a prospective clinical trial conducted by the LEAP Consortium. Eighteen percent of patients had a high confidence Tier 1 or 2 recommendation. We describe clinical responses in the 14% of patients with relapsed/refractory leukemia who received the matched targeted therapy. Further, in order to inform future targeted therapy for patients, we validated variants of uncertain significance, performed ex vivo drug-sensitivity testing in patient leukemia samples, and identified new combinations of targeted therapies in cell lines and patient-derived xenograft models. These data and our collaborative approach should inform the design of future precision medicine trials. Significance: Patients with relapsed/refractory leukemias face limited treatment options. Systematic integration of precision medicine efforts can inform therapy. We report the feasibility of identifying targetable mutations in children with leukemia and describe correlative biology studies validating therapeutic hypotheses and novel mutations. See related commentary by Bornhauser and Bourquin, p. 1322. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1307

Although inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is recognized as an effective agent in relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in adults, data on safety and efficacy in pediatric patients are scarce. We report the use of InO in 51 children with relapsed/refractory ALL treated in the compassionate use program. In this heavily pretreated cohort, complete remission was achieved in 67% of patients with overt marrow disease. The majority (71%) of responders were negative for minimal residual disease. Responses were observed irrespective of cytogenetic subtype or number or type of prior treatment regimens. InO was well-tolerated; grade 3 hepatic transaminitis or hyperbilirubinemia were noted in 6 (12%) and grade 3/4 infections in 11 (22%) patients. No patient developed sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) during InO therapy; however, 11 of 21 (52%) patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) following InO developed SOS. Downregulation of surface CD22 was detected as a possible escape mechanism in three patients who developed a subsequent relapse after InO. We conclude that InO is a well-tolerated, effective therapy for children with relapsed ALL and prospective studies are warranted. Identification of risk factors for developing post-HSCT SOS and strategies to mitigate this risk are ongoing.

Although many children and young adults with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) are cured with modern, risk-adapted chemotherapy regimens, 10% to 15% of patients will experience relapse or have refractory disease. Recent efforts to further intensify cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens in the frontline setting have failed as a result of excessive toxicity or lack of improvement in efficacy. As a result, novel approaches will be required to achieve cures in more newly diagnosed patients. Multiple immune-based therapies have demonstrated considerable efficacy in the setting of relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease, including CD19 targeting with blinatumomab and tisagenlecleucel and CD22 targeting with inotuzumab ozogamicin. These agents are now under investigation by the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) in clinical trials for newly diagnosed B-ALL, with integration into standard chemotherapy regimens based on clinically and biology-based risk stratification as well as disease response.

Asparaginase, an important treatment component for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), causes severe hepatotoxicity in some patients. Levocarnitine is a mitochondrial co-factor that can potentially ameliorate the mitochondrial toxicity of asparaginase. In this retrospective case series, we describe the clinical presentation and management of six pediatric and young adult patients (mean age 12.7, range 9–24 years) with ALL who developed Grade 3–4 hyperbilirubinemia following administration of asparaginase as part of induction/re-induction therapy. Five of these patients were treated with levocarnitine with subsequent improvement of hyperbilirubinemia, while one patient was given levocarnitine prophylactically during induction and developed Grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia, but did not require therapy adjustments or delays. Increased awareness in the pediatric oncology community regarding asparaginase-associated hepatic toxicity and the potential role of levocarnitine in management is warranted.

Background: The CD22-directed antibody-drug conjugate inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is FDA-approved for adults with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CD22+ B-ALL and highly active in children with multiply R/R CD22+ B-ALL. Notable toxicities include cytopenias and hepatic toxicity, including sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) occurring primarily after subsequent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The incorporation of InO into frontline ALL therapy for patients (pts) with CD22+ high-risk B-ALL who are not anticipated to require HSCT in first remission may optimize use of this effective agent without incurring significant SOS risk by minimizing relapse and therefore potential need for future HSCT. Methods: Children's Oncology Group (COG) AALL1732 is a phase 3 trial for pts 1-24 years of age with B-ALL who have high-risk features based on age, white blood cell count, or presence of extramedullary disease at diagnosis (Figure 1). Pts receive a 4-drug induction followed by augmented BFM consolidation. Those with surface CD22 expression on >20% of blasts at diagnosis and bone marrow minimal residual disease Results: Forty-eight pts continued on therapy after randomization, (Arm A: 25, Arm B: 23), with median age 12 years and body surface area 1.4m 2 on each arm (Table 1). There were no statistically significant differences in grade ≥3 ALT or bilirubin levels between Arms A and B through day 1 of DI. During DI, 4 pts on Arm B had grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia compared to none on Arm A, all in the setting of concurrent infection. The rates of SOS did not cross protocol-defined safety thresholds and were not statistically different between arms; on Arm A, 1/25 pts (4%, 1 grade 3 event) and on Arm B, 3/23 pts developed SOS (13%, 1 grade 4, 2 grade 2). The patient with grade 4 SOS discontinued protocol therapy. The duration of the IM1 block of therapy was significantly longer for patients on Arm B compared to those on Arm A (mean duration of 90 days (sd 15.3) versus 75.5 days (sd 14.4), p=0.002). Day 1 HD-MTX clearance to 14-day delay in the start of the second (Day 15) HD-MTX in 4/23 pts (17.4%) on Arm B compared to 0/25 on Arm A, p=0.046. In contrast, time to MTX clearance and rate of >96-hour clearance were not significantly different between the arms for the other HD-MTX doses (Days 15, 29, 43). Omission of oral 6MP occurred at a significantly higher frequency on Arm B compared to Arm A at several time points in IM1, with an association between HD-MTX clearance of >96 hours and the need to hold oral 6MP (p=0.011, p=0.018, and p=0.042 for days 1, 15, and 43, respectively). During DI, sepsis occurred more frequently in pts on Arm B. There were 6 (27%) Grade 3 events and 6 (27%) ≥Grade 4 events among 22 Arm B patients, including 3 pts with multiorgan failure and one death. In contrast, among 25 pts on Arm A, there were 2 (8%) Grade 3 sepsis events and no ≥Grade 4 events. The rate of sepsis was significantly higher on Arm B (12 of 22, 54%) compared to Arm A (2 of 25, 8%, p= 0.001). The majority of sepsis events were due to bacterial infections, and 8 of 12 events on Arm B occurred in the second half of DI. Conclusion: Planned safety phase analysis of the first 50 randomized pts demonstrated increased rates of delayed MTX clearance following the first HD-MTX infusion in IM1 and more sepsis events due to bacterial infections during DI in Arm B patients. Hepatic toxicity and SOS occurred infrequently and did not differ significantly between arms. We plan to amend AALL1732 to decrease the dose of InO by 20% and increase hydration for the first HD-MTX infusion. We will recommend prophylaxis with broad-spectrum antibiotics during periods of neutropenia in DI as well as monitoring of serum IgG levels, with replacement for IgG Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures McNeer: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board Member. O'Brien: Jazz: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Wood: Juno, Pfizer, Amgen, Seattle Genetics: Other: Laboratory Services Agreement; Pfizer, Amgen, Seattle Genetics: Honoraria. Raetz: Pfizer: Research Funding; Celgene: Other: DSMB member. Loh: MediSix therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

BACKGROUND There is no clear consensus between pediatric and adult providers about the treatment of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). METHODS Failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between 114 patients ages 17 to 21 years with HL who were treated on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network Intergroup adult E2496 study and 391 similarly patients ages 17 to 21 years with HL who were treated on the pediatric Children's Oncology Group (COG) AHOD0031 study. RESULTS Comparing AYAs from the COG and E2496 studies, there were no significant differences in extralymphatic disease, anemia, or hypoalbuminemia. More AYAs in the E2496 trial had stage III and IV disease (63% vs 29%; P < .001) and B symptoms (63% vs 27%; P < .001), and fewer had bulk disease (33% vs 77%; P < .001). More AYAs on the COG trial received radiotherapy (76% vs 66%; P = .03), although in smaller doses. E2496 AYA The 5-year FFS and OS rates were 68% and 89%, respectively in the E2496 AYAs and 81% and 97%, respectively, in the COG AYAs, indicating a statistically superior compared in the COG AYAs (P = .001). In stratified multivariable analyses, E2496 AYAs had worse FFS than COG AYAs in all strata except patients who had stage I and II HL without anemia. Propensity score analysis (based on stage, anemia, and bulk disease) confirmed inferior FFS for E2496 AYAs compared with COG AYAs (P = .004). On the E2496 study, FFS was significantly divergent across age groups (P = .005), with inferior outcomes for those ages 17 to 21 years versus 22-44 years. There was no difference across age on the COG study. CONCLUSIONS Younger AYA patients with HL appear to have better outcomes when treated on a pediatric trial than patients of similar age on an adult trial. Prospective studies examining these differences are warranted. Cancer 2017. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Summary Background Treatment outcomes among survivors of cancer diagnosed during adolescence and early young adulthood have not been characterised independently of survivors of cancers diagnosed during childhood. We aimed to describe chronic health conditions and all-cause and cause-specific mortality among survivors of early-adolescent and young adult cancer. Methods The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) is a retrospective cohort study with longitudinal follow-up of 5-year survivors diagnosed with cancer before the age of 21 years at 27 academic institutions in the USA and Canada between 1970 and 1999. We evaluated outcomes among survivors of early-adolescent and young adult cancer (aged 15–20 years at diagnosis) and survivors diagnosed at age younger than 15 years (matched on primary cancer diagnosis, including leukaemia, lymphoma, CNS tumours, neuroblastoma, Wilms tumour, soft-tissue sarcomas, and bone cancer) by comparing both groups to siblings of the same age. Mortality was ascertained with the National Death Index. Chronic health conditions were classified with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) were estimated with age-specific, sex-specific, and calendar year-specific US rates. Cox proportional hazard models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for chronic health conditions and 95% CIs. Findings Among 5804 early-adolescent and young adult survivors (median age 42 years, IQR 34–50) the SMR compared to the general population for all-cause mortality was 5·9 (95% CI 5·5–6·2) and among 5804 childhood cancer survivors (median age 34 years; 27–42), it was 6·2 (5·8–6·6). Early-adolescent and young adult survivors had lower SMRs for death from health-related causes (ie, conditions that exclude recurrence or progression of the primary cancer and external causes, but include the late effects of cancer therapy) than did childhood cancer survivors (SMR 4·8 [95% CI 4·4–5·1] vs 6·8 [6·2–7·4]), which was primarily evident more than 20 years after cancer diagnosis. Early-adolescent and young adult cancer survivors and childhood cancer survivors were both at greater risk of developing severe and disabling, life-threatening, or fatal (grade 3–5) health conditions than siblings of the same age (HR 4·2 [95% CI 3·7–4·8] for early adolescent and young adult cancer survivors and 5·6 [4·9–6·3] for childhood cancer survivors), and at increased risk of developing grade 3–5 cardiac (4·3 [3·5–5·4] and 5·6 [4·5–7·1]), endocrine (3·9 [2·9–5·1] and 6·4 [5·1–8·0]), and musculoskeletal conditions (6·5 [3·9–11·1] and 8·0 [4·6–14·0]) when compared with siblings of the same age, although all these risks were lower for early-adolescent and young adult survivors than for childhood cancer survivors. Interpretation Early-adolescent and young adult cancer survivors had higher risks of mortality and severe and life threatening chronic health conditions than the general population. However, early-adolescent and young adult cancer survivors had lower non-recurrent, health-related SMRs and relative risks of developing grade 3–5 chronic health conditions than childhood cancer survivors, by comparison with siblings of the same age, which were most notable more than 20 years after their original cancer. These results highlight the need for long-term screening of both childhood and early-adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. Funding National Cancer Institute and American Lebanese-Syrian Associated Charities.

10052 Background: Patients (pts) diagnosed with hematologic malignancies during adolescence & young adulthood (AYA) are a uniquely challenging population who are understood to have robust supportive care needs. Here, we describe their symptom burdens and the feasibility of integrating palliative care into an outpatient, multi-disciplinary AYA leukemia clinic at an academic medical center. Methods: Palliative care was introduced into the AYA clinic in 8/2020 to provide symptom-focused care. Pre-existing clinic services included psychologists, pharmacists, and social workers. All established pts receiving routine follow up were referred by the oncology team to the Supportive Care team, which provided same-day palliative care consultation in the same clinic space with a telehealth option and as needed follow-up. To describe baseline symptom burdens, a random cross-sectional sample of pts completed a multi-domain symptom assessment (SA) using validated self-report instruments including physical (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale [ESAS]); emotional (Brief Symptom Inventory-18 [BSI-18]); financial (FACIT-COST); cognitive (Childhood Cancer Survivor Study – Neurocognitive Questionnaire); spiritual (FACIT -Spiritual Well-being Scale); and quality of life (QOL) (FACT-General) measures. All pts have a diagnosis of acute or chronic leukemia and were on active treatment or in survivorship. Results: Over 6 months, 30 pts (median age 29 years at assessment, range 18-45 years) received symptom-focused palliative care over 16 combined clinics with 81 total encounters averaging 5 pts (range 1-8) per clinic. 47% were female. No pts declined palliative care. Pts received on average 2.7 follow up visits (range 1-6), with 50% of encounters resulting in adjustments to medical management. Common issues addressed included pain, muscle cramps, neuropathy, anxiety, insomnia, depression, nausea, and non-pharmacological symptom control remedies. Of 46 pts, 31 (67%) completed the SA (median age 30 years at assessment, range 18-43 years); 48% were female; 84% were on treatment. 100% of pts reported fatigue, and 48% reported > = 1 severe symptom (range 0-7) based on the ESAS with “poor feeling of well-being” as the most common (23%). 45% met criteria for BSI-18 emotional distress, and 45% reported some neurocognitive impairment. Emotional distress (p < 0.01), financial toxicity (p = 0.03), low spiritual well-being (p < 0.01), and presence of pain, nausea, or depression (p < 0.05) were all associated with lower QOL. Conclusions: AYA pts with leukemia undergoing treatment and in survivorship experience high symptom burden with poor QOL. It is feasible to both assess symptom burden and provide early palliative care focused on symptom management in an outpatient, multi-disciplinary clinic setting.

Philadelphia (Ph)-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a molecular subtype of high-risk B-cell ALL characterized by formation of abnormal gene fusions involving tyrosine kinase (TK) and cytokine receptor genes and activation of TK signaling. Because of the diversity of associated genetic changes, the detection of Ph-like ALL cases currently requires multiple cytogenetic and molecular assays; thus, our goal was to develop a consolidated workflow for detecting genetic abnormalities in Ph-like ALL. We found that total and targeted RNA sequencing (RNAseq)-based approach allowed the detection of abnormal fusion transcripts (EBF1-PDGFRB, P2RY8-CRLF2, RCSD1-ABL1, and RCSD1-ABL2). The bioinformatics algorithm accurately detected the fusion transcripts without prior input about possible events. Additionally, we showed that RNAseq analysis enabled evaluation for disease-associated sequence variants in expressed transcripts. While total RNAseq can be a second tier approach allowing discovery of novel genetic alterations, the targeted RNAseq workflow offers a clinically applicable method for the detection of fusion transcripts.

BACKGROUND Studies have demonstrated superior outcomes for adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who are treated using pediatric versus adult therapeutic regimens. To the best of our knowledge, whether adult oncologists in the United States have adopted this approach to ALL in AYA patients is currently unknown. The objective of the current study was to provide a population-based description of ALL treatment patterns in AYA individuals over the past decade. METHODS Data regarding AYA patients aged 15 to 39 years and diagnosed with ALL between 2004 and 2014 while living in the Greater Bay Area were obtained from the Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry (GBACR). Treating facilities were designated as pediatric or adult centers; induction treatment regimens were abstracted from registry text data fields. RESULTS Of 304 patients diagnosed in the GBACR catchment region, complete treatment data were available for 229 (75%). The location of care was identified for 296 patients (97%) treated at 31 unique centers. Approximately 70% of AYA patients received induction therapy at an adult treatment center. All AYA patients who were treated at pediatric centers received pediatric ALL regimens. Among AYA patients treated by adult oncologists with complete treatment data, none received a pediatric regimen before 2008. Between 2008 and 2012, while the US Adult Intergroup C10403 pediatric-inspired ALL protocol was open to accrual, 31% of AYA patients treated by adult oncologists received pediatric regimens. This rate fell to 21% from 2013 through 2014. Adult facilities treating ≥ 2 AYA patients with ALL per year captured in the GBACR were more likely to administer pediatric regimens than lower volume centers (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS As of 2014, only a minority of AYA patients with ALL received pediatric ALL regimens at adult cancer centers. Cancer 2017;122–130. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Background The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines recommend collecting blood cultures for the first 3 days of febrile neutropenia (FN) in the clinically stable oncology patient with persistent fevers. Nonetheless, many physicians send daily blood cultures beyond 3 days, and the impact of that practice is uncertain. Procedure We reviewed pediatric FN episodes from July 2009 to May 2014 at University of Chicago Comer Children's Hospital. For each positive culture, we determined if it was a pathogen or a contaminant. We reviewed episode and patient demographics to identify risk factors for subsequent positive blood cultures in the setting of an initially negative culture. Results We identified 381 episodes of FN in 162 patients. Of those, 87 had a positive blood culture on day 1 (21.0% incidence of bacteremia). Of 294 episodes with a negative blood culture on day 1, six (2.04%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42–3.67) had a positive culture after day 3. Of those, three were pathogens (1.02%, 95%CI –0.14 to 2.18), and only one was found in a hemodynamically stable patient (0.34%, 95%CI –0.33 to 1.01) with new mucositis. In the other two patients, Escherichia coli was isolated from blood cultures after day 10 in the setting of significant hemodynamic changes. Risk factor analysis performed in stable patients yielded nonsignificant results. Conclusions Of 294 FN episodes with an initial negative blood culture, only one episode of bacteremia occurred without hemodynamic changes past day 3, supporting the IDSA guidelines to discontinue blood cultures in stable FN patients after day 3.

Purpose Children and young adults with hypodiploid B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) fare poorly and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) is often pursued in first complete remission (CR1). We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of children and young adults with hypodiploid B-ALL who were enrolled in recent Children’s Oncology Group (COG) trials to evaluate the impact of HSCT on outcome. Patients and Methods Cytogenetic analyses and DNA index were performed at COG-approved laboratories, and hypodiploidy was defined as modal chromosome number less than 44 and/or DNA index less than 0.81. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was determined centrally using flow cytometry at two reference laboratories. Patients with hypodiploid ALL came off protocol therapy postinduction and we retrospectively collected details on their subsequent therapy and outcomes. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated for the cohort. Results Between 2003 and 2011, 8,522 patients with National Cancer Institute standard-risk and high-risk B-ALL were enrolled in COG AALL03B1 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00482352). Hypodiploidy occurred in 1.5% of patients (n = 131), 98.3% of whom achieved CR after induction therapy. Five-year EFS and OS were 52.2% ± 4.9% and 58.9% ± 4.8%, respectively. Outcomes for patients undergoing CR1 HSCT were not significantly improved: 5-year EFS and OS were 57.4% ± 7.0% and 66.2% ± 6.6% compared with 47.8% ± 7.5% and 53.8% ± 7.6%, respectively ( P = .49 and .34, respectively) for those who did not undergo transplantation. Patients with MRD of 0.01% or greater at the end of induction had 5-year EFS and OS of 26.7% ± 9.3% and 29.3% ± 10.1%, respectively, and HSCT had no significant impact on outcomes. Conclusion Children and young adults with hypodiploid B-ALL continue to fare poorly and do not seem to benefit from CR1 HSCT. This is especially true for patients with MRD of 0.01% or greater at the end of induction. New treatment strategies are urgently needed for these patients.

10520 Background: Outcomes for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are superior with pediatric-inspired therapy. CALGB 10403, the first US adult cooperative group prospective trial using a pediatric-inspired augmented BFM (ABFM)-based regimen, demonstrated feasibility and improved survival. We examined differences in drug delivery and targeted toxicities in AYAs who received the same therapy on C10403 vs the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) study AALL1131. Methods: The proportion of AYAs receiving full dose (within 10% of protocol- specified) vincristine (VCR) and pegaspargase (PEG) during induction (IND), consolidation (CON), and delayed intensification (DI); the likelihood of selected grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs); and the impact of patient characteristics were compared in AYAs 16-30 years. Targeted AEs with analogous reporting requirements in both studies included hyperbilirubinemia, pancreatitis, sensory neuropathy, and GI/intracranial hemorrhage. Thrombosis, transaminitis and hyperglycemia were not comparably captured. Fisher’s Exact test and logistic regression models were used for analyses. Results: After excluding AYAs removed from study after induction, 87 AALL1131 AYAs (accrued 2012-2016) and 188 C10403 AYAs (accrued 2007-2012) were analyzed with median ages of 17 (16-26) vs 22 (17-30) years, p < 0.001. There was no difference in the intensity of VCR delivery during IND, but in CON and DI, AALL1131 AYAs were more likely to receive all specified VCR (93.1% vs 81.9%, p = 0.02; 92.7% vs 72.1%, p = 0.01). Women were less likely to receive all specified VCR (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.34-0.94, p = 0.03), and overweight/obese AYAs were somewhat less likely to receive all VCR compared to those considered normal weight (OR 0.88 and 0.59, p = 0.09). More C10403 AYAs were obese/overweight compared to AALL1131 AYAs (p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in dosing of PEG during IND/CON, but in DI AALL1131 AYAs were more likely to receive both doses (75.6% vs 57.1%, p = 0.03). No patient variables impacted delivery of PEG. There was no significant difference in grade ≥3 toxicities captured similarly on both studies. Conclusions: AYAs enrolled on AALL1131 were more likely to receive all protocol-specified VCR and PEG compared to those on C10403. Selected AE rates were comparable, suggesting that older AYAs do not tolerate doses of VCR and PEG for reasons other than toxicity, with body habitus as one potential variable. Further analyses to compare dose density, toxicities, and outcomes experienced by younger AYAs versus older are ongoing.

We thank the research coordinators and following physicians at pediatric cancer centers for contributing data to this project: Prashant Hiwarkar and Jayashree Motwani, Birmingham Women’s and Children’s Hospital, UK; Kelly Malone, Children’s Hospital of Colorado, USA; Mylene Bassal, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Canada; Yoav Messinger and Joanna Perkins, Children’s Hospital of Minnesota, USA; Van Huynh, Children’s Hospital of Orange County, USA; Richard Ho, Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt, USA; Joanne Chuah and Jessa Morales, Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Australia; Donald Wells, Dell Children’s Hospital, USA; Nicolas Boissel, Hospital Saint-Louis, France; Tannie Huang, Kaiser Permanente, USA; Stacey Marjerrison, McMaster Children’s Hospital, Canada; William Carroll and Joanna Pierro, New York University Langone Medical Center, USA; Ajay Vora, Sheffield Children’s Hospital, UK; Donna Lancaster, The Royal Marsden Hospital, UK; Lucie Šrámková, University Hospital Motol, Czech Republic; Chatchawin Assanasen, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, USA; Rupert Handgretinger, University of Tübingen, Germany.

BACKGROUND Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer face unique psychosocial challenges. This pilot study was aimed at describing the prevalence of psychological morbidities among AYAs with hematologic malignancies during curative-intent therapy and early survivorship and at examining provider perceptions of psychological morbidities in their AYA patients. METHODS Patients aged 15 to 39 years with acute leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, or Hodgkin lymphoma who were undergoing curative-intent therapy (on-treatment group) or were in remission within 2 years of therapy completion (early survivors) underwent a semistructured interview that incorporated measures of anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress (PTS). A subset of providers (n = 15) concomitantly completed a survey for each of the first 30 patients enrolled that evaluated their perception of each subject's anxiety, depression, and PTS. RESULTS Sixty-one of 77 eligible AYAs participated. The median age at diagnosis was 26 years (range, 15-39 years), 64% were male, and 59% were non-Hispanic white. On-treatment demographics differed significantly from early-survivor demographics only in the median time from diagnosis to interview. Among the 61 evaluable AYAs, 23% met the criteria for anxiety, 28% met the criteria for depression, and 13% met the criteria for PTS; 46% demonstrated PTS symptomatology. Thirty-nine percent were impaired in 1 or more psychological domains. Psychological impairments were as frequent among early survivors as AYAs on treatment. Provider perceptions did not significantly correlate with patient survey results. CONCLUSIONS AYAs with hematologic malignancies experience substantial psychological morbidities while they are undergoing therapy and during early survivorship, with more than one-third of the patients included in this study meeting the criteria for anxiety, depression, or traumatic stress. This psychological burden may not be accurately identified by their oncology providers. Cancer 2016;122:954–61. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Remarkable improvements in survival rates have made childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) a success story within pediatric oncology. The excellent outcomes for many patients with ALL have resulted in part from risk stratification based on well-established clinical and disease features of prognostic significance. Despite the progress that has been observed, relapses occur unpredictably, and treatment can be associated with acute and long-term toxicity. This has prompted efforts to better tailor ALL therapy in individual patients. In recent years, there has been a growing expansion in our knowledge of underlying disease biology as well as inherent patient characteristics, and this has contributed to a movement toward more personalized ALL therapy. In this article, we have focused on examples of how comprehensive genomic analyses are being utilized to individualize childhood ALL treatment as well as how these analyses may be further leveraged in the future.

Advances in health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) measurement enable point-of-care assessments. We incorporated the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMISAYAs (18-39 years old) completed the 10-question PROMIS Global. Summary subscale scores for Global Physical Health (GPH) and Global Mental Health (GMH) were produced using established scoring algorithms (standardized mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). In addition to comparisons by treatment status, associations between lower subscale scores (45, previously defined as clinically meaningful) and patient characteristics were assessed using two-sample t-tests among those off treatment.Of 147 patients approached, 142 consented. Mean age was 24.6 ± 5.3 years; 53.5% were male; and 61.3% had hematologic malignancies. Most (76%) were off treatment; 43.0% had treatment complications. While mean GPH and GMH scores did not differ from the standardized population mean (GPH, 49.7 ± 8.8, p = 0.73; GMH, 50.5 ± 9.3, p = 0.55), mean GPH scores were lower among those on treatment (44.3 ± 9.0) than off treatment (51.5 ± 8.1, p 0.0001). There was no difference in GMH scores by treatment status. Among those off treatment, 26.9% of GPH and 22.2% of GMH scores were45. The only factor associated with lower GPH scores was treatment complications; no factors were associated with lower GMH scores.Point-of-care HRQL assessment with AYAs is feasible. Among patients off treatment, GPH scores were lower for patients with treatment complications. Further research is needed to understand factors associated with lower GMH scores in this AYA oncology population.

There is no clear consensus between pediatric and adult providers about the treatment of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).Failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between 114 patients ages 17 to 21 years with HL who were treated on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network Intergroup adult E2496 study and 391 similarly patients ages 17 to 21 years with HL who were treated on the pediatric Children's Oncology Group (COG) AHOD0031 study.Comparing AYAs from the COG and E2496 studies, there were no significant differences in extralymphatic disease, anemia, or hypoalbuminemia. More AYAs in the E2496 trial had stage III and IV disease (63% vs 29%; P.001) and B symptoms (63% vs 27%; P.001), and fewer had bulk disease (33% vs 77%; P.001). More AYAs on the COG trial received radiotherapy (76% vs 66%; P = .03), although in smaller doses. E2496 AYA The 5-year FFS and OS rates were 68% and 89%, respectively in the E2496 AYAs and 81% and 97%, respectively, in the COG AYAs, indicating a statistically superior compared in the COG AYAs (P = .001). In stratified multivariable analyses, E2496 AYAs had worse FFS than COG AYAs in all strata except patients who had stage I and II HL without anemia. Propensity score analysis (based on stage, anemia, and bulk disease) confirmed inferior FFS for E2496 AYAs compared with COG AYAs (P = .004). On the E2496 study, FFS was significantly divergent across age groups (P = .005), with inferior outcomes for those ages 17 to 21 years versus 22-44 years. There was no difference across age on the COG study.Younger AYA patients with HL appear to have better outcomes when treated on a pediatric trial than patients of similar age on an adult trial. Prospective studies examining these differences are warranted. Cancer 2018;124:136-44. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Compared to younger and older age groups, the incidence of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) has increased more in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) population, the cause of which is unknown. As of the last decade, only half of the AYA patients with these diseases were surviving 10 years. Strong evidence exists that favors "pediatric" treatment regimens for AYAs compared to "adult" treatment regimens in terms of survival rates, hospitalization time, toxicities, late effects, and quality of life both during and after treatment. Targeted agents are clinically accessible for certain subsets of patients with Philadelphia-like ALL, the incidence of which peaks in AYAs. Treatment teams must appreciate the complex psychosocial underpinnings in these patients in order to maximize compliance with the prolonged and complex treatment plans during the AYA years.

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is pooled immunoglobulin G derived from human blood donors. It was introduced in the early 1980s to treat immunodeficiency disorders. Since then, its use has expanded to other fields such as neurology, rheumatology, and hematology. IVIG has been used to provide passive immunity in qualitative and quantitative immunoglobulin disorders, to neutralize antibodies in immune-mediated diseases, and as an immune modulatory agent. The difficulty of producing IVIG in high quantities, in addition to a growing list of “off-label” indications, has resulted in a worldwide shortage and increase in cost. From a pediatric hematology perspective, IVIG is considered an appropriate therapeutic option in autoimmune cytopenias, sometimes coadministrated with steroids. Its use in other hematologic disorders is questionable, and there is not sufficient evidence to recommend it. This article provides clear information to the general pediatrician about indications for IVIG therapy in children with hematologic disorders. [ Pediatr Ann . 2017;46(1):e13–e18.]

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common and one of the most curable malignancies in children; however, it presents unique challenges in adolescents and young adults (AYAs). The purpose of this review is to discuss factors that contribute to the outcome disparities in AYAs with ALL as well as approaches that can be taken to optimize the care of this patient population.AYAs with ALL are unique and have outcomes that have lagged behind those observed in children with ALL. Contributing factors to the challenges faced by this group include distinctive disease biology, different drug pharmacology and toxicity profiles, and complex psychosocial and socioeconomic factors. Several clinical trials conducted worldwide have demonstrated that treatment with pediatric protocols significantly improves outcomes in the AYA population.Initiatives to improve outcomes for AYAs with ALL include treatment with pediatric regimens tailored to be delivered without excessive toxicity and in centers with the necessary supportive care and medical services to address the specific needs of this population. As more is understood about the unique disease biology of AYA ALL, targeted therapeutic approaches may offer promise for the future.

The diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is made by evaluating morphology and immunophenotype. However, appropriate risk stratification and decisions regarding the intensity of therapy are influenced by additional clinical and laboratory testing that reflect the biology of the disease. Recent years have seen tremendous progress in uncovering genetic lesions that influence the biology of ALL. In recognition of these advances, the 2008 WHO classification incorporated the category of B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma with recurrent genetic abnormalities into the classification of precursor lymphoid neoplasms. Based on the knowledge available at the time, genetic lesions associated with distinct clinical features, immunophenotype, prognosis, or other unique biological characteristics were included in this category. Not surprisingly, significant novel genetic lesions that profoundly affect the biology of ALL have since been identified and will have a major impact on risk stratification and may ultimately be incorporated into future classification schemes. After establishing an initial diagnosis and treatment regimen, hematopathologists must also evaluate for minimal residual disease (MRD) to determine the need for additional intervention because MRD remains the most useful clinical indicator of disease progression and response to treatment. Doing so requires familiarity with not only morphology, but also flow cytometry and molecular genetics. Although not all of these applications are handled directly by the hematopathologist, it is our strong belief that meaningful involvement in patient care dictates that hematopathologists appreciate all aspects of ALL diagnosis and disease monitoring. This review covers the salient aspects of recent advances in the biology of ALL and evaluation of MRD, placing emphasis on how this information may ultimately be used to improve risk stratification and, as a result, patient outcomes.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common pediatric malignancy. While considered to be a largely curable disease, almost 15% of patients with ALL in the pediatric age group are at a hig...

Despite the remarkable pace of characterizing the genomics of pediatric acute leukemias, the integration of real-time sequencing results into clinical practice has lagged. With increased availability of molecularly-targeted therapies, the promise of matching genetic lesions in patients' leukemia cells to treatment has not yet been fully realized. We established the first pediatric leukemia clinical genomics consortium in the United States, known as the Leukemia Precision-based Therapy (LEAP) Consortium, which includes 13 major pediatric cancer institutions. We hypothesized that it is feasible to identify and match, in real-time, actionable alterations with a targeted therapy for pediatric patients with relapsed, refractory or high-risk leukemias or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Using a combination of a DNA-based next-generation sequencing panel and RNA-based gene fusion testing, followed by data review by our multidisciplinary molecular tumor board, we are conducting a clinical trial to test this hypothesis. To date, we have enrolled and reviewed data from 143 patients stratified by disease status: Cohort 1, patients with relapsed or refractory leukemias (n=93), and Cohort 2, patients with de novo high-risk leukemias or MDS (n=50). A matched targeted therapy (MTT) recommendation has been made for 72% (n=103) of patients, tiered based on the level of evidence linking the mutation to potential activity of targeted therapy in the context of each patient's disease (Tier 1: 11%, Tier 2: 4%, Tier 3: 41%, Tier 4: 6%, Tier 5: 10%). Of the 44 patients in Cohort 1 with clinical follow-up data, 5 (11%) had alterations in therapy made based upon sequencing results and MTT recommendation. These include the use of the MEK inhibitor trametinib for RAS mutant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) (n=2), dasatinib for B-ALL and T-ALL with NUP214-ABL1 translocations (n=2) and ponatinib for B-ALL with an ABL1 T315I mutation (n=1). In addition, this genomic data refined diagnosis and supported additional germline assessment in a subset of patients. In parallel to the genomic sequencing, we are conducting high-throughput drug sensitivity (HTS) assays to study in vitro anti-leukemia effects of a panel of up to 120 targeted inhibitors in the context of leukemia-associated genetic alterations. Of the initial 106 accrued patients, 40 (38%) had adequate amounts of blood or bone marrow for in vitro drug testing. All samples were tested in the inhibitor panel assay, and 65% of the samples yielded interpretable results. Inhibitor screening data was compiled for all 12 patients with genetic alterations resulting in Tier 1, 2 or 3 MTT recommendations. This subset of patients had leukemias with two distinct molecular profiles: 1) oncogenic RAS signaling pathway mutations or 2) oncogenic tyrosine kinase alterations. Our molecular tumor board recommended trametinib for the first group of patients and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), specific to the mutation, for the second group of patients. In vitro HTS data analysis demonstrated dose-response sensitivity of leukemia cells with RAS pathway mutations to trametinib, many of which had half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) less than 50 nM. Similarly, leukemia cells from patients with FLT3, ABL1 or KIT mutations generally showed dose-responses to relevant TKIs with low IC50s. Overall, HTS data were concordant with MTT recommendations informed by the sequencing results. This first in the US multi-institutional prospective leukemia genomics trial brings state-of-the-art clinical genetic testing, assessment of prognostic biomarkers, selection of patients for germline testing, and targeted therapeutic treatment recommendations to children and young adults with high-risk, relapsed or refractory leukemias or MDS. Our collaboration provides a unique opportunity to perform sophisticated patient-specific in vitro drug testing assays to impact MTT discovery efforts, which we plan to validate in vivo using patient-derived xenograft models where feasible. We believe that a model like the LEAP Consortium has the potential to transform precision medicine approaches for children with high-risk leukemias and to inform future genomics-guided therapeutic trials and drug discovery efforts. Disclosures Tasian: Aleta Biopharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Burke:JAZZ: Speakers Bureau; Shire: Speakers Bureau; AMGEN: Speakers Bureau. Tyner:AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Vivid Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Array: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Aptose: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding.

10518Background: Despite the remarkable pace in characterizing the genomics of acute leukemias, integration of sequencing into clinical practice is lagging. With increased availability of targeted ...

Glucocorticoids are an integral component of therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), but usage differs between cooperative group protocols. All groups use glucocorticoids during induction but vary on whether to use dexamethasone or prednisone. Issues to consider in the choice of induction steroid include impact on event-free and overall survival, acute morbidity such as infection risk, diabetes, and behavioural disturbances and long-term complications such as avascular necrosis. It is generally agreed that dexamethasone is the steroid of choice for groups using a delayed intensification phase, but dosing schedules (intermittent versus continuous) vary. There is no consensus on the potential benefit of steroid administration during maintenance therapy. This review will summarize the current available data on steroid use in paediatric ALL, highlighting outcomes as well as major toxicities.

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines recommend collecting blood cultures for the first 3 days of febrile neutropenia (FN) in the clinically stable oncology patient with persistent fevers. Nonetheless, many physicians send daily blood cultures beyond 3 days, and the impact of that practice is uncertain.We reviewed pediatric FN episodes from July 2009 to May 2014 at University of Chicago Comer Children's Hospital. For each positive culture, we determined if it was a pathogen or a contaminant. We reviewed episode and patient demographics to identify risk factors for subsequent positive blood cultures in the setting of an initially negative culture.We identified 381 episodes of FN in 162 patients. Of those, 87 had a positive blood culture on day 1 (21.0% incidence of bacteremia). Of 294 episodes with a negative blood culture on day 1, six (2.04%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-3.67) had a positive culture after day 3. Of those, three were pathogens (1.02%, 95%CI -0.14 to 2.18), and only one was found in a hemodynamically stable patient (0.34%, 95%CI -0.33 to 1.01) with new mucositis. In the other two patients, Escherichia coli was isolated from blood cultures after day 10 in the setting of significant hemodynamic changes. Risk factor analysis performed in stable patients yielded nonsignificant results.Of 294 FN episodes with an initial negative blood culture, only one episode of bacteremia occurred without hemodynamic changes past day 3, supporting the IDSA guidelines to discontinue blood cultures in stable FN patients after day 3.

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer face unique psychosocial challenges. This pilot study was aimed at describing the prevalence of psychological morbidities among AYAs with hematologic malignancies during curative-intent therapy and early survivorship and at examining provider perceptions of psychological morbidities in their AYA patients.Patients aged 15 to 39 years with acute leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, or Hodgkin lymphoma who were undergoing curative-intent therapy (on-treatment group) or were in remission within 2 years of therapy completion (early survivors) underwent a semistructured interview that incorporated measures of anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress (PTS). A subset of providers (n = 15) concomitantly completed a survey for each of the first 30 patients enrolled that evaluated their perception of each subject's anxiety, depression, and PTS.Sixty-one of 77 eligible AYAs participated. The median age at diagnosis was 26 years (range, 15-39 years), 64% were male, and 59% were non-Hispanic white. On-treatment demographics differed significantly from early-survivor demographics only in the median time from diagnosis to interview. Among the 61 evaluable AYAs, 23% met the criteria for anxiety, 28% met the criteria for depression, and 13% met the criteria for PTS; 46% demonstrated PTS symptomatology. Thirty-nine percent were impaired in 1 or more psychological domains. Psychological impairments were as frequent among early survivors as AYAs on treatment. Provider perceptions did not significantly correlate with patient survey results.AYAs with hematologic malignancies experience substantial psychological morbidities while they are undergoing therapy and during early survivorship, with more than one-third of the patients included in this study meeting the criteria for anxiety, depression, or traumatic stress. This psychological burden may not be accurately identified by their oncology providers.

Pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia is the most common childhood cancer. Although the appearance of the disease is often quite dramatic, there are many patients who present much more indolently, creating a diagnostic dilemma for the primary care pediatrician. The appropriate diagnostic work-up assesses the initial extent of disease and stability of a patient, and provides information that is important for risk stratification. Such information includes patient age and white blood cell count at diagnosis, leukemia immunophenotype, presence or absence of extramedullary disease, and blast cytogenetic abnormalities. After therapy is initiated, the response of the disease to treatment is key for predicting outcomes. Altogether, this information is used to guide overall treatment intensity. Chemotherapy is administered in sequential blocks or phases, and lasts for several years. In general, outcomes are excellent and the majority of patients survive, but there are still subsets of patients who do not fare as well, either due to resistant or recurrent disease, or due to long-term and late effects of therapy. [ Pediatr Ann . 2015;44(7):e168–e174.]

The translocation t(8;14)(q24;q11) has been described at the cytogenetic and molecular level in pediatric cases of T-cell leukemia/lymphoma [1]. Although infrequent, the cases reported show a very ...

10512 Background: Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), a CD22-targeting antibody linked to calicheamicin demonstrated exceptional activity in R/R ALL in adults. InO has been available to pediatric patients with R/R ALL via a compassionate access program. Methods: Participating international pediatric oncology centers received IRB approval to submit retrospective demographic, outcome and toxicity data on pediatric patients who received at least one dose of InO. Results: Thirty-four patients, age 2.3-21.4 yrs (median 11.7) received 1-4 cycles (3 weekly doses) of InO. Patients were heavily pretreated in 1st-5threlapse; 28 were refractory to their preceding regimen. Thirteen patients had prior hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), 27 received prior CD19 and 8 prior CD22-directed therapy. Pre-InO disease was M3 ( > 25% blasts) in 26 patients, M2 (5-25%) in 3, and MRD only in 5 (1 with extramedullary disease). Of 29 patients with M2/M3 disease at baseline, 18 (62%) achieved a complete remission (CR), 13 of whom were MRD negative. Post-InO, 15 patients proceeded to HSCT and 5 to CAR T-cell therapy. Alterations in CD22 expression at subsequent relapse were noted in two patients with available blasts samples. No deaths were attributed to InO during therapy. The incidence of grade 3/4 infections was 38% and were of the expected types. Grade 1-4 hepatic toxicity was noted in 11/34 (32%) patients, primarily asymptomatic elevations in transaminases/bilirubin. There was no sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) during InO therapy but 8/15 patients who received HSCT post-InO developed SOS. One patient died from SOS, but the others recovered. The incidence of SOS was higher in patients who had undergone prior HSCT (6/8) versus no prior HSCT (2/7). SIRS (1), neurotoxicity (2) and hemorrhage (3) were infrequent. Three patients had musculoskeletal pain associated with edema. Conclusions: Single agent InO had a CR rate of 62% in heavily pretreated pediatric patients. Toxicities were similar to adults with hepatic and infectious toxicity being the most common. Overall InO was well tolerated, but the incidence of SOS was high in patients who underwent HSCT post-InO, particularly in those who had undergone a prior HSCT.

256 Background: Prior research reveals that AYA survivors face significant short-term and long-term physical and psychological symptom burdens (SB) as a result of disease and treatment. Yet, the prevalence of SB and their effect on AYA coping in hematologic survivors has not been described. Methods: AYA patients (15-40 years at diagnosis) of acute leukemia, aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma undergoing curative intent therapy (on-treatment cohort) or 2 year completion of therapy and in remission (early survivor cohort) completed following measures: depression (CES-D), state anxiety (STAI-S), PTSD (PCL-C), HRQOL (FACIT-G), Coping (Brief COPE). Semi-structured interviews evaluated symptom burdens. Results: To date, 60 AYA subjects (26 on-treatment, 34 early survivors) were interviewed. For total population: median age at diagnosis 25y (15-40); 63% male; 58% Ca; 79% college/postgrad educated; 40% income < $75,000yr; 51% and 48% lymphoma or leukemia dx, respectively. Median time from diagnosis to interview was 13 months (1-102). In general, 56% AYA reported experiencing current physical (e.g. pain, sleep) SB and 58% AYA experienced psychological (e.g. anxiety) SB. AYA on treatment reported moderate STAI-S anxiety (35.0 ± 10.3 v 31 ± 10.2, p = 0.03); and CES-D depression (21 ± 12.1 v 10.4 ± 8.0, p = 0.01). AYA on treatment had poorer overall FACT-G health-related QOL (76.5 ± 12.8 v 82.3 ± 17.0, p = 0.02). Re coping, AYA on-treatment with depression scored highest on self-blame (5.2 ± 2.7; range: 3.5-6.8). AYA on-treatment with anxiety scored highest on denial (4.3 ± 2.1; range: 1-6). AYA in remission reported severe illness-related PTSD symptoms (58 ± 24.3 v 29.4 ± 9.5, p = 0.01). Re coping strategies, AYA in remission with PTSD scored on average significantly higher on: denial (6.5 ± 3.2; range 4.6-8.0); self-blame (6.6 ± 2.3; range: 4.2-7.9) and substance use (5.9 ± 2.1; range: 2.9-8.0). Conclusions: AYAs with hematologic malignancies report experiencing significant physical and psychological SB in the short and long-term. Early integration of palliative care targeting these SB should be incorporated into routine cancer as well as survivor care.