Search

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia / Journal Canadien d'Anesthésie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Purpose: We investigated whether preventive use of dexmedetomidine during surgery was effective for reducing emergence agitation and postoperative delirium.Methods: In this double-blind randomized-controlled trial, 143 patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung resection surgery were randomly assigned to the dexmedetomidine-sevoflurane (DEX-Sevo, n = 73) or sevoflurane (Sevo, n = 70) groups. Dexmedetomidine or saline administration was started after inducing anesthesia and continued until the end of surgery at a fixed dose (0.5 µg·kg-1·hr-1). The primary endpoint was the incidence of delirium up until the end of postoperative day 3. Emergence agitation and postoperative delirium were measured with the Riker sedation agitation scale and the confusion assessment method, respectively. The secondary endpoints were serum cytokine and catecholamine levels.Results: The DEX-Sevo group showed less frequent emergence agitation than the Sevo group (13% vs 35%, respectively; relative risk, 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18 to 0.79; P = 0.011) but the incidence of delirium after discharge from the postanesthesia care unit was not different (25% vs 25%, DEX-Sevo vs Sevo). Both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines were lower in the DEX-Sevo group than in the Sevo group. Nevertheless, the interleukin (IL)6/IL10 ratio (median difference, 5.8; 95% CI,1.8 to 10.0; P = 0.012) and IL8/IL10 ratio (median difference, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.2 to 1.3; P = 0.007) were higher in the DEX-Sevo group than in the Sevo group, indicating a pro-inflammatory cytokine balance in the DEX-Sevo group. Norepinephrine and epinephrine levels were lower in the DEX-Sevo group than in the Sevo group (both, P < 0.001).Conclusions: Intraoperative dexmedetomidine reduced emergence agitation but not postoperative delirium in patients undergoing thoracic surgery. Dexmedetomidine seemed to affect emergence agitation through catecholamines, but not through an anti-inflammatory action. Trial registration Clinical Research Information Service (KCT 0001877); registered 7 April, 2016. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

(1) Background: Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) is preferred over open prostatectomy because it offers superior surgical outcomes and better postoperative recovery. The steep Trendelenburg position and pneumoperitoneum required in Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, however, increase intracranial pressure (ICP). The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of elevated ICP on the quality of emergence from anesthesia. (2) Methods: Sixty-seven patients undergoing RALP were enrolled. We measured optic nerve sheath diameter at four timepoints during surgery. Primary outcome was inadequate emergence in the operating room (OR). Secondary outcomes were postoperative neurologic deficits of dizziness, headache, delirium, cognitive dysfunction, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). (3) Results: A total of 69 patients were screened for eligibility and 67 patients completed the study and were included in the final analysis. After establishing pneumoperitoneum with the Trendelenburg position, ONSD increased compared to baseline by 11.4%. Of the 67 patients, 36 patients showed an increase of 10% or more in optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). Patients with ΔONSD ≥ 10% experienced more inadequate emergence in the OR than those with ΔONSD < 10% (47.2% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.003). However, other variables related to the quality of emergence from anesthesia did not different significantly between groups. Similarly, neurologic deficits, and PONV during postoperative day 3 showed no significant differences. (4) Conclusions: ICP elevation detected by ultrasonographic ONSD measurement was associated with a transient, inadequate emergence from anesthesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Ropivacaine is widely used as a local analgesic, but it has toxicity that is related to the concentration, and highly concentrated ropivacaine can induce motor nerve blockage., Aim: To investigate the safety of low-concentration pre-incisional ropivacaine injection for postoperative pain control and compare postoperative adverse events between a low-concentration ropivacaine injection group and a high-concentration ropivacaine injection group., Material and Methods: Patients who underwent thyroidectomy via the bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) between June 2017 and October 2021 performed by a single surgeon at Samsung Medical Center were retrospectively identified. These outcomes were compared between the two groups after 1 : 1 propensity score matching., Results: From a total of 633 patients, 620 patients were selected. There were 527 in the low-concentration ropivacaine group and 93 in the high-concentration ropivacaine group. After propensity score matching, two comparable groups with 93 patients in each were obtained. The incidence of ropivacaine-related adverse events was similar between the two groups (p = 0.186) but the occurrence of postoperative bradycardia (p = 0.048) was lower in the low-concentration ropivacaine group than in the high-concentration ropivacaine group. Other outcomes such as postoperative pain scores (p = 0.363), postoperative nausea and vomiting (p > 0.999), and postoperative opioid consumption (p = 0.699) were similar between the two groups., Conclusions: Pre-incisional low-concentration ropivacaine injection was effective for postoperative pain control and can be safely used in BABA thyroidectomy., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright: © 2022 Fundacja Videochirurgii.)

Background: In 2017, we established an airway call (AC) team composed of anesthesiologists to improve emergency airway management outside the operating room. In this retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the airway registry, we describe the characteristics of patients attended to and practices by the AC team during the first 4 years of implementation., Methods: All AC team activations in which an airway intervention was performed by the AC team between June 2017 and May 2021 were analyzed., Results: In all, 359 events were analyzed. Activation was more common outside of working hours (62.1%) and from the intensive care unit (85.0%); 36.2% of AC activations were due to known or anticipated difficult airway, most commonly because of acquired airway anomalies (n = 49), followed by airway edema or bleeding (n = 32) and very young age (≤ 1 years; n = 30). In 71.3% of the cases, successful intubation was performed by the AC team at the first attempt. However, three or more attempts were performed in 33 cases. The most common device used for successful intubation was the videolaryngoscope (59.7%). Tracheal intubation by the AC team failed in nine patients, who then required surgical airway insertion by otolaryngologists. However, there were no airway-related deaths., Conclusions: When coupled with appropriate assistance from an otolaryngologist AC system, an AC team composed of anesthesiologists could be an efficient way to provide safe airway management outside the operating room., Trial Registration: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0006643., Competing Interests: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (© 2021 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.)