1. Survival in node-positive early oral squamous cell carcinoma: sentinel node biopsy versus elective neck dissection
- Author
-
Jeremy D, McMahon, Farhan, Zubair, Scott, McNicol, W Stuart, Hislop, Saife, Salem, David, Howard, Davinder, Utam, Craig, Wales, and James, McCaul
- Subjects
Otorhinolaryngology ,Head and Neck Neoplasms ,Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy ,Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck ,Carcinoma, Squamous Cell ,Humans ,Neck Dissection ,Mouth Neoplasms ,Surgery ,Oral Surgery ,Neoplasm Staging ,Retrospective Studies - Abstract
Patients undergoing sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) for early oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) who harbour occult metastases (pN+ve) may be at greater risk of mortality due to prolonged overall treatment times than those identified as pN+ve on elective neck dissection (ELND). A retrospective comparative survival analysis was therefore undertaken to test this hypothesis. Patients were identified from the South Glasgow multidisciplinary team (MDT) database. Group 1 comprised 38 patients identified as pN+ve, or who were false negative, on sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Group 2 comprised 146 patients staged pN+ve on ELND. The groups were compared with the Kaplan Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. In addition, a matched-pair analysis was performed. A unique and specifically designed algorithm was deployed to optimise the pairings. No difference in disease-specific or overall survival was found between the groups. Patients undergoing SLNB as the initial neck staging modality in early OSCC and are identified as pN+ve do not appear to be at a survival disadvantage compared with those staged with ELND.
- Published
- 2022