Search

Background:. Implant-based reconstruction is the most common method of postmastectomy reconstruction. Many patients require postmastectomy radiation (PMRT). Tissue expanders (TEs), typically inserted as a first stage, have historically been placed subpectorally. More recently, prepectoral reconstruction has gained popularity, but its impact on PMRT is unknown. Prior studies focus on complication rates and aesthetic outcomes. This study examines whether there is a difference in radiation dosimetry among patients undergoing prepectoral versus subpectoral TE reconstruction. Methods:. Electronic medical records and radiation plans of 50 patients (25 prepectoral, 25 subpectoral) who underwent mastectomy with immediate TE reconstruction at our institution or affiliate site were reviewed. Pectoralis major muscle and chest wall structures were contoured and mean percentage volumes of these structures receiving less than 95%, 100%, and more than 105% target radiation dose were calculated, as were heart and ipsilateral lung doses. Welch two sample t test, Fisher exact test, and Pearson chi-squared tests were performed. Results:. The groups had comparable patient and tumor characteristics and underwent similar ablative and reconstructive procedures and radiation dosimetry. Subpectoral patients had larger mean areas receiving less than 95% target dose (“cold spots”); prepectoral patients had larger mean areas receiving greater than 105% (“hot spots”) and 100% target doses. There were no differences in chest wall, heart, and lung doses. Conclusions:. Our results demonstrate an increased mean percentage area of pectoralis cold spots with subpectoral reconstruction and increased area of hot spots and 100% dose delivery to the pectoralis in prepectoral patients. Larger studies should analyze long-term effects of prepectoral reconstruction on radiation dosing and recurrence rates.

Background:. The internal mammary vessels are the preferred recipient during free-flap breast reconstruction (FFBR). Previous studies have demonstrated that the left internal mammary vein (IMV) is consistently smaller than the right, but with unclear clinical implications. This study explores the impact of IMV size difference on FFBR complication rates. Methods:. Abdominal-based FFBRs were retrospectively reviewed. Venous coupler size was considered a proxy for IMV diameter. Outcomes of three patient cohorts (all, unilateral, and bilateral reconstructions) were analyzed with univariate and multivariate analysis. Results:. Our cohort consisted of 582 patients who underwent 874 abdominal-based FFBR, with a similar number of unilateral (n = 290) and bilateral (n = 292), and right (n = 424) and left (n = 450) reconstructions. Mean follow-up was over 4-years. For all reconstructions, the left IMV (2.7 ± 0.4 mm) was smaller than the right (3.0 ± 0.4 mm) (P < 0.0001). Complication rates between left- and right-sided FFBR were similar, but with a trend toward increased fat necrosis on the left (n = 17, 3.8% versus n = 8, 1.9%). Further subgroup analysis showed significantly higher fat necrosis in unilateral left-sided FFBR (n = 12 versus n = 2, P = 0.02), with left-sided FFBR being an independent risk factor for fat necrosis on multivariate analysis. Conclusions:. The left-side IMV is significantly smaller than the right IMV. In bilateral reconstructions, the smaller size of the left IMV did not result in a greater risk of complications; however, in unilateral FFBR, fat necrosis was significantly higher on the left side.

Background:. Factor V Leiden (FVL) is the most common inherited thrombophilia in White people. Thrombotic complications resulting from free flap breast reconstruction in FVL patients have been studied to a limited degree. We evaluated whether patients heterozygous for a FVL mutation undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction had increased risk of micro- or macrovascular thrombotic complications compared with patients without a diagnosed thrombophilia. Methods:. We performed a retrospective cohort study of deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstructions at Brigham and Women’s Hospital (1/2015–12/2020) comparing patients diagnosed as FVL heterozygotes compared with matched controls without a diagnosed thrombophilia. Patients were matched using coarsened exact matching algorithm based on clinical characteristics. The primary outcomes were micro- (return to OR for flap compromise, flap loss) and macrovascular (venous thromboembolism) complications. Results:. A total of 506 patients (812 flaps) were included in this study. Eleven patients (17 flaps) were FVL heterozygotes. After matching, 10 patients (16 flaps) with FVL were matched to 55 patients (94 flaps). The return to OR for flap compromise was 0% in the FVL cohort compared with 5% (n = 5/94, 3/94 flaps lost, P = 1.00) in the matched controls (1.9%, n = 15/795 in unmatched controls, 0.6%, n = 5/795 loss rate). There were zero venous thromboembolism events among FVL patients compared with 2% of controls (n = 1/55). Conclusions:. FVL heterozygosity did not increase the risk of micro- or macrovascular complications in patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. This study supports the safety of microvascular reconstruction in this group of patients when appropriate venous thromboembolism prophylaxis is given.

Summary:. We present 2 patients in whom the course of the deep inferior epigastric vessels was intra-abdominal during deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. Preoperative computed tomography angiography gave no indication of an unusual pedicle location. In both cases, pedicle dissection was completed safely without bowel injury, and reconstruction was completed successfully. Reconstructive surgeons need not abandon DIEP flap reconstruction upon discovering that the deep inferior epigastric vessels are intra-abdominal. Unfortunately, computed tomography angiography imaging does not identify this variant preoperatively. The risk of postoperative ileus after intra-abdominal pedicle dissection may be higher than the risk after dissection of retrorectus deep inferior epigastric pedicles, and thus it is reasonable to consider the use of prophylactic mesh in these cases.

Background:. The incidence of bilateral mastectomies is increasing along with the rates of breast reconstructions. A substantial number of patients will present with abdominal scars after Cesarean section, laparoscopy, laparotomy, and so on. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of prior abdominal scars on complication rates in abdominal bilateral free flap breast reconstruction. Methods:. All consecutive patients with autologous free flap breast reconstruction between 2007 and 2014 were eligible. The relevant demographic and clinical data were prospectively collected into a study-specific database. Complications and reoperations were prospectively registered after postoperative outpatient visits. Results:. Overall, 493 patients underwent abdominally based breast reconstruction during the study period: unilateral (n = 250; 50.7%) or bilateral (n = 243; 49.3%). In the bilateral group, the abdominal scar locations were Pfannenstiel (n = 73; 30.1%), midline (n = 16; 6.6%), lower oblique (n = 17; 7.0%), upper oblique (n = 5; 2.1%), and laparoscopic (n = 69; 28.4%). Four (1.7%) flap failures (including 1 converted to a pedicled transverse rectus abdominis flap) were registered, all occurring in patients from the scar group: 3 with Pfannenstiel incision and 1 patient with prior laparoscopy. Pfannenstiel scar was associated with higher risk of hematoma at the recipient site when compared with no scar group (13.7% versus 2.2%; P = 0.006). Partial flap necrosis, infection, and seroma occurred in 14 (5.9%), 8 (3.4%), and 5 (2.1%) patients, respectively, and no differences between the scar groups were identified. Conclusion:. Surgical outcomes of bilateral reconstructions in patients with abdominal scars are generally comparable with ones in patients without prior surgery; however, some problems have been identified. These procedures might have some intraoperative considerations and often require increased operative times. Apart from the traditional preoperative computed tomography angiography, intraoperative imaging (e.g., fluorescence angiography) may be advocated in patients with abdominal scars.

Background:. Despite promising pilot study results, adoption of neurotization of immediate implant-based reconstructions has not occurred. Methods:. For surgeons interested in adopting breast reinnervation techniques, we present ways to overcome initial barriers by decreasing operative time and maximizing chances of sensory recovery. Results:. We discuss the combined experience at two academic teaching hospitals, where neurotization of both immediate tissue expander cases and direct-to-implant reconstructions are performed through varying mastectomy incisions. Conclusion:. Initial barriers can be overcome by shortening operative time and providing an individualized reinnervation approach that aims to increase the chance of meaningful sensation.