Search

Aims Determining which patients with pericardial effusion require urgent intervention can be challenging. We sought to develop a novel, simple risk prediction score for patients with pericardial effusion. Methods and results Adult patients admitted through the emergency department (ED) with pericardial effusion were retrospectively evaluated. The overall cohort was divided into a derivation and validation cohort for the generation and validation of a novel risk score using logistic regression. The primary outcome was a pericardial drainage procedure or death attributed to cardiac tamponade within 24 h of ED arrival. Among 195 eligible patients, 102 (52%) experienced the primary outcome. Four variables were selected for the novel score: systolic blood pressure 3 cm (2 points)], right ventricular diastolic collapse (2 points), and mitral inflow velocity variation > 25% (1 point). The need for pericardial drainage within 24 h was stratified as low ( Conclusion Among ED patients with pericardial effusion, a four-variable prediction score consisting of systolic blood pressure, effusion diameter, right ventricular collapse, and mitral inflow velocity variation can accurately predict the need for urgent pericardial drainage. Prospective validation of this novel score is warranted.

Long-term mechanical ventilation (MV) is defined as the use of MV for more than 6 hours per day for at least 3 weeks. Children requiring long-term MV include those with neuromuscular disease, central dysregulation, or lung dysfunction. Such children with medical complexity may be at risk for ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction. Ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction has been described in adult patients requiring acute MV with ultrasound (US). At this time, diaphragmatic US has not been evaluated in the pediatric post-acute care setting or incorporated into weaning strategies. We present 24 cases of children requiring long-term MV who underwent diaphragmatic US examinations to evaluate for ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction.

BACKGROUND Despite the utilization of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) by trauma surgeons, formal POCUS requirements do not exist for general surgery residents. We sought to evaluate surgery resident comfort with performing and interpreting of Extended-Focused Assessment for Sonography in Trauma (E-FAST) scans after a brief educational session. METHODS A pre-survey, sent to PGY-2 and -3 surgical residents before their trauma rotation, evaluated comfort with eight components of the E-FAST. Residents were then required to watch a 15-min online video and attend a 1-h bedside training session moderated by emergency medicine ultrasound fellows during which residents practised E-FAST image acquisition and interpretation. After the rotation, residents completed a post-survey evaluating their comfort with the E-FAST. RESULTS All 27 residents rotating on the trauma service during the 2017-2018 academic year were eligible and, therefore, approached by the study team. Twenty-one (77.78%) residents completed the pre-survey, training and post-survey. Initially, only 52% (13/25) of residents reported feeling confident in performing the E-FAST. After the session, all (100%) reported feeling confident in their training in E-FAST. Self-reported mean comfort with each of the eight components of the E-FAST showed a statistically significant (P

Assessment of diaphragmatic function has been well described in the intensive care setting as well as in emergency medicine and pediatrics. Conventional M-mode evaluation of diaphragmatic excursion is frequently associated with over and under-estimations of diaphragmatic excursion. Angle-independent M-mode allows free rotation and movement of the analysis line to obtain M-mode images in a direction that more accurately reflects diaphragmatic excursion. In order to provide a standardized approach to the evaluation of diaphragmatic excursion with angle-independent M-mode, we propose a landmark-based approach utilizing the spine in order to target the same diaphragmatic segment consistently throughout the diaphragmatic analysis. While the proposed approach is not intended to replace current methods, it may improve accuracy and inter-rater reliability. The relevant background, as well as three patient cases, are presented demonstrating the use of a landmark-based approach in the emergency department. Angle-independent M-mode may provide a more accurate and consistent evaluation of diaphragmatic excursion, an examination that can be used to guide clinical care and anticipate outcomes.

PURPOSE We sought to assess whether ultrasound (US) measurements of carotid flow time (CFTc) and carotid blood flow (CBF) predict fluid responsiveness in patients with suspected sepsis. METHODS This was a prospective observational study of hypotensive (systolic blood pressure

Background Diagnosis of acute osteomyelitis in young children can be challenging due to the lack of specific clinical signs and symptoms. Prompt diagnosis and treatment is essential to prevent complications and to improve long-term prognosis and reduce the need for operative intervention. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may be a useful tool to detect early changes associated with osteomyelitis. Case Report A 26-month-old boy presented with 6 days of fever and 3 days of focal pain over the right anterior lower ribs without swelling, erythema, or bony deformity, and negative chest x-ray study. A POCUS was performed by the ultrasound fellows and revealed deep soft tissue swelling, periosteal elevation, and increased vascular flow with color Doppler. The patient was admitted to the pediatric service with infectious disease consultation and started on antibiotics. Magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the diagnosis of a right seventh anterior rib osteomyelitis, and the patient subsequently improved and was discharged home. Why Should an Emergency Physician Be Aware of This? In this case, the use of POCUS in the emergency department heightened the suspicion for acute osteomyelitis in a rare location and guided early diagnosis and treatment.

In 2007, the Texas legislature appropriated money for a pilot study to evaluate cardiovascular screening of student athletes to identify those who might be at risk of sudden death using a questionnaire, physical examination, electrocardiography, and limited echocardiography. We sought to determine (1) the feasibility of a state-wide cardiovascular screening program, (2) the ability to reliably identify at-risk subjects, and (3) problems in implementing screening state wide. The data were analyzed using established pediatric electrocardiographic and echocardiographic criteria. Positive results were confirmed by a blinded reviewer. In 31 venues (2,506 students), the electrocardiographic findings met the criteria for cardiovascular disease in 57 (2.3%), with 33 changes suggestive of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 14 with long QT syndrome, 7 with Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome, and 3 with potential ischemic findings related to a coronary anomaly. Of the 2,051 echocardiograms, 11 had findings concerning for disease (9 with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and 1 with dilated cardiomyopathy). In patients with electrocardiographic findings consistent with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, the limited echocardiograms were normal in 24 of 33. Of the 33 who remained at risk of sudden death on the electrocardiogram or echocardiogram, 25 (65.8%) pursued the recommended evaluation, which confirmed long QT syndrome in 4, Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome in 7, and dilated cardiomyopathy in 1. The interobserver agreement was 100% for electrocardiography and 79% for echocardiography. The questionnaire identified 895 (35% of the total) potentially at-risk students, with disease confirmed in 11 (1.23%). In conclusion, in this large state-funded project, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic screening identified 11 of 2,506 patients potentially at risk of cardiovascular disease. The questionnaire was of limited value and had a large number of false-positive results. Interobserver variation was significant for echocardiography and might create problems with limited echocardiographic screening. Finally, many subjects with abnormal screening results declined a follow-up evaluation.