Search

Background To determine the populations who suitable for surgical treatment in elderly patients (age ≥ 75 y) with IA stage. Methods The clinical data of NSCLC patients diagnosed from 2010 to 2015 were collected from the SEER database and divided into surgery group (SG) and no-surgery groups (NSG). The confounders were balanced and differences in survival were compared between groups using PSM (Propensity score matching, PSM). Cox regression analysis was used to screen the independent factors that affect the Cancer-specific survival (CSS). The surgery group was defined as the patients who surgery-benefit and surgery-no benefit according to the median CSS of the no-surgery group, and then randomly divided into training and validation groups. A surgical benefit prediction model was constructed in the training and validation group. Finally, the model is evaluated using a variety of methods. Results A total of 7297 patients were included. Before PSM (SG: n = 3630; NSG: n = 3665) and after PSM (SG: n = 1725, NSG: n = 1725) confirmed that the CSS of the surgery group was longer than the no-surgery group (before PSM: 82 vs. 31 months, P < .0001; after PSM: 55 vs. 39 months, P < .0001). Independent prognostic factors included age, gender, race, marrital, tumor grade, histology, and surgery. In the surgery cohort after PSM, 1005 patients (58.27%) who survived for more than 39 months were defined as surgery beneficiaries, and the 720 patients (41.73%) were defined surgery-no beneficiaries. The surgery group was divided into training group 1207 (70%) and validation group 518 (30%). Independent prognostic factors were used to construct a prediction model. In training group (AUC = .678) and validation group (AUC = .622). Calibration curve and decision curve prove that the model has better performance. Conclusions This predictive model can well identify elderly patients with stage IA NSCLC who would benefit from surgery, thus providing a basis for clinical treatment decisions.

Objective To develop and validate a generalized prediction model that can classify epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status in non–small cell lung cancer patients. Methods A total of 346 patients (296 in the training cohort and 50 in the validation cohort) from four centers were included in this retrospective study. First, 1085 features were extracted using IBEX from the computed tomography images. The features were screened using the intraclass correlation coefficient, hypothesis tests and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) were used to build a radiomics model for classification. The models were evaluated using the following metrics: area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve (CAL), decision curve analysis (DCA), concordance index (C-index), and Brier score. Results Sixteen features were selected, and models were built using LR, DT, RF, and SVM. In the training cohort, the AUCs was .723, .842, .995, and .883; In the validation cohort, the AUCs were .658, 0567, .88, and .765. RF model with the best AUC, its CAL, C-index (training cohort=.998; validation cohort=.883), and Brier score (training cohort=.007; validation cohort=0.137) showed a satisfactory predictive accuracy; DCA indicated that the RF model has better clinical application value. Conclusion Machine learning models based on computed tomography images can be used to evaluate EGFR status in patients with non–small cell lung cancer, and the RF model outperformed LR, DT, and SVM.

Objective To investigate the relationship between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and their risk of developing brain metastases after adjusting for confounding factors. Methods A retrospective observational study of the general data of patients with NSCLC diagnosed from January 2016 to December 2020. Multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate the dominance ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for NLR and NSCLC brain metastases with subgroup analysis. Generalized summation models and smoothed curve fitting were used to identify whether there was a nonlinear relationship between them. Results In all 3 models, NLR levels were positively correlated with NSCLC brain metastasis (model 1: OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.01-1.23, P = .025; model 2: OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.04-1.29, P = .007; model 3: OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.05-1.37, P = .006). Stratified analysis showed that this positive correlation was present in patients with adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and female patients (LUAD: OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.10-1.54, P = .002; female: OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.05-2.20, P = .026), while there was no significant correlation in patients with squamous carcinoma (LUSC) and male patients (LUSC: OR:0.76,95% CI:0.38- 1.53, P = .443; male: OR:1.13, 95% CI:0.95-1.33, P = .159). Conclusion This study showed that elevated levels of NLR were independently associated with an increased risk of developing brain metastases in patients with NSCLC, and that this correlation varied by TYPE and SEX, with a significant correlation in female patients and patients with LUAD.