1. Efficacy of laparoscopic radical resection of right-sided colon cancer by different surgical approaches: network-meta-analysis
- Author
-
Mingyi Li, Jie Hu, Liwei Suo, Hui Wu, Ziming Li, Xiaoyi Xu, and Shifeng Zhang
- Subjects
Laparoscopy ,Right-sided colon cancer ,Intermediate approach ,Caudolateral approach ,Caudolateral combined with intermediate approach ,Network meta-analysis ,Surgery ,RD1-811 - Abstract
Abstract Introduction There are a growing number of surgical approaches for laparoscopic radical resection of right-sided colon cancer, while there are relatively few comparative analyses of the different surgical approaches. Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of different surgical approaches (intermediate approach, caudolateral approach, caudolateral combined with intermediate approach) for laparoscopic radical resection of right-sided colon cancer by conducting a network meta-analysis (NMA). Method We searched PubMed, Web of science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases. We reviewed the Chinese and English literature on controlled studies of laparoscopic radical resection of right-sided colon cancer including intermediate approach, caudolateral approach and caudolateral combined with intermediate approach, reported from the establishment of the database to September 2023. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were independently conducted by two researchers and relevant data was extracted from the qualifying literature and analyzed using Stata15 software. Results Nine controlled studies of relevance including 715 patients were screened with right-sided colon cancer. Net meta-analysis showed that compared with the intermediate approach, the caudolateral approach was superior to the intermediate approach in terms of operation time (SMD = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.38 ~ 1.12, P = 0.0001), and bleeding volume (SMD = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.18 ~ 2.13, P = 0.002), while the difference was not statistically significant among the caudolateral approach compared with the intermediate approach in terms of the number of lymph node dissection, postoperative complication rate, time to first postoperative flatus and postoperative hospitalization. Compared with the intermediate approach, the combined approach was superior to the intermediate approach in terms of operation time (SMD = -0.87, 95% CI = -1.22 ~ -1.52, P
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF