Search

Nbaa Masood, Joohi Jimenez-Shahed Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai West, New York, NY, USACorrespondence: Joohi Jimenez-Shahed, Associate Professor of Neurology & Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Bonnie and Tom Strauss Movement Disorders Center, 1000 10th Avenue, Suite 10C, New York, NY, 10019, USA, Tel +1 212-523-8335, Fax +1 212-523-8342, Email Joohi.Jimenez-Shahed@mountsinai.orgAbstract: Motor complications related to the chronic administration of levodopa and failure to prevent the neurodegenerative disease process counterbalance the pivotal discovery of levodopa as the cornerstone of PD treatment. Excellent motor control is offered early during the course of treatment, but this diminishes as pathological changes in the striatum lead to synaptic dopamine levels becoming completely dependent on exogenous dopamine. This non-physiologic stimulation of dopamine receptors eventually manifests as OFF episodes. As no disease modifying therapy exists for PD that can disrupt these pathological changes, most research and treatment focuses on optimization of dopaminergic stimulation of striatal receptors so that they mimic tonic, physiologic stimulation as closely as possible. Strategies focusing on these challenges have included non-pharmacologic approaches, optimizing levodopa pharmacokinetics, using adjunctive treatments including those with non-dopaminergic mechanisms, and implementing rescue therapies. Device aided therapies, including surgery, are also available. In this review, we will focus on effective management of motor symptoms related to OFF periods, including emerging strategies. Unmet clinical needs will be discussed, including non-motor symptoms, targeted molecular therapies and disease modifying therapy.Keywords: continuous dopaminergic stimulation, advanced Parkinson’s Disease, motor complications, nonmotor symptoms, dyskinesias, chronic levodopa complications

Ami B Patel, Joohi Jimenez-Shahed Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA Abstract: Inhaled levodopa is a newly emerging therapeutic option in the treatment of “off” symptoms associated with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Its mode of delivery offers more rapid absorption of levodopa and shorter onset of clinical benefit compared to oral formulations, and has been shown to be feasible for use in patients with PD experiencing worse motor function due to declining plasma levodopa levels. Clinical development of this compound is supported by preclinical, Phase I–III, long-term-safety studies and studies in special populations, including otherwise-healthy asthmatics and smokers. These investigations demonstrated that the drug is well tolerated without risk of long-term (up to 1 year) changes in pulmonary function or spirometry measures. The most common side effects among PD patients were a mild cough, upper respiratory tract infection, nausea, sputum discoloration, and dyskinesia. Inhaled levodopa offers a different administration method and side-effect profile from the currently available options for rescue therapy for Off periods in PD, though comparative studies have not been performed. The drug is presently under review by the US Food and Drug Administration. Keywords: levodopa, dry-powder inhalation, motor fluctuations, dyskinesia, spirometry

Joohi Jimenez-ShahedDepartment of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USAAbstract: Dystonia is a movement disorder of uncertain pathogenesis that is characterized by involuntary and inappropriate muscle contractions which cause sustained abnormal postures and movements of multiple or single (focal) body regions. The most common focal dystonias are cervical dystonia (CD) and blepharospasm (BSP). The first-line recommended treatment for CD and BSP is injection with botulinum toxin (BoNT), of which two serotypes are available: BoNT type A (BoNT/A) and BoNT type B (BoNT/B). Conventional BoNT formulations include inactive complexing proteins, which may increase the risk for antigenicity, possibly leading to treatment failure. IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin®; Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany) is a BoNT/A agent that has been recently Food and Drug Administration-approved for the treatment of adults with CD and adults with BSP previously treated with onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox®; Allergen, Inc, Irvine, CA) – a conventional BoNT/A. IncobotulinumtoxinA is the only BoNT product that is free of complexing proteins. The necessity of complexing proteins for the effectiveness of botulinum toxin treatment has been challenged by preclinical and clinical studies with incobotulinumtoxinA. These studies have also suggested that incobotulinumtoxinA is associated with a lower risk for stimulating antibody formation than onabotulinumtoxinA. In phase 3 noninferiority trials, incobotulinumtoxinA demonstrated significant improvements in CD and BSP symptoms in both primary and secondary measures, compared with baseline, and met criteria for noninferiority versus onabotulinumtoxinA. In placebo-controlled trials, incobotulinumtoxinA also significantly improved the symptoms of CD and BSP, with robust outcomes in both primary and secondary measures. The use of incobotulinumtoxinA has been well tolerated in all trials, with an adverse event profile similar to that of onabotulinumtoxinA. Based on these data, incobotulinumtoxinA is a safe and effective BoNT/A for the treatment of CD and BSP, and may pose a lower risk for immunogenicity leading to treatment failure compared with other available BoNT agents. This paper reviews the treatment of focal dystonias with BoNTs, in particular, incobotulinumtoxinA. Controlled trials from the existing incobotulinumtoxinA literature are summarized.Keywords: blepharospasm, botulinum toxin, cervical dystonia, complexing proteins, dystonia, incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin®)

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) and Huntington's disease (HD)-associated chorea are persistent and disabling hyperkinetic disorders that can be treated with vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 (VMAT2) inhibitors, including the recently approved once-daily (QD) formulation of deutetrabenazine (DTBZ ER). While its efficacy and safety profile have not been directly investigated, currently available data confirms bioequivalence and similar bioavailability to the twice-daily formulation (DTBZ BID). The authors briefly review the pivotal trials establishing efficacy of DTBZ for TD and HD-associated chorea, the pharmacokinetic data for bioequivalence between QD and BID dosing of DTBZ, as well as dose proportionality evidence, titration recommendations, and safety profile for DTBZ ER. Long-term data show that DTBZ is efficacious and well tolerated for the treatment of TD and HD-associated chorea. DTBZ ER likely demonstrates therapeutic equivalence with no new safety signals. Due to the lack of comparative clinical trial data, no evidence-based recommendation about choice of VMAT2 inhibitor or switching between VMAT2 inhibitors can be made about best practice. Ultimately, QD dosing may offer the chance of improved medication adherence, an important consideration in patients with complex treatment regimens and/or patients with cognitive decline. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients frequently transition between the 'ON' state, where medication is effective, and the 'OFF' state, affecting their quality of life. Monitoring these transitions is vital for personalized therapy. We introduced a framework based on Reinforcement Learning (RL) to detect transitions between medication states by learning from continuous movement data. Unlike traditional approaches that typically identify each state based on static data patterns, our approach focuses on understanding the dynamic patterns of change throughout the transitions, providing a more generalizable medication state monitoring method. We integrated a deep Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network and three one-class unsupervised classifiers to implement an RL-based adaptive classifier. We tested on two PD datasets: Dataset PD1 with 12 subjects (14-minute average recording) and Dataset PD2 with seven subjects (120-minute average recording). Data from wrist and ankle wearables captured transitions during 2 to 4-hour daily activities. The algorithm demonstrated its effectiveness in detecting medication states, achieving an average weighted F1-score of 82.94% when trained and tested on Dataset PD1. It performed well when trained on Dataset PD1 and tested on Dataset PD2, with a weighted F1-score of 76.67%. It surpassed other models, was resilient to severe PD symptoms, and performed well with imbalanced data. Notably, prior work has not addressed the generalizability from one dataset to another, essential for real-world applications with varied sensors. Our innovative framework revolutionizes PD monitoring, setting the stage for advanced therapeutic methods and greatly enhancing the life quality of PD patients.

Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Isaacson: Dr. Isaacson reports honoraria for CME, consultancy, research grants, and/or promotional speaker work on behalf of AbbVie, Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Acorda Therapeutics, Addex, Affiris, Alexza, Allevion, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Annovis, Aptinyx, Athira, Bial, Biogen, BlueRock, Britannia Pharmaceuticals, Bukwang, Cala, Cerecor, Cerevel, CND, Eli Lilly, Enterin, Exeltis, Esteve, Fasikl, GE Healthcare, Global Kinetics, Inhibikase, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Ipsen, Jazz, Kyowa Kirin, Lundbeck, Medscape, Merz, Michael J. Fox Foundation, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Neuralys, Neurocrine, Neuroderm, Neurolive, Exeltis, Novartis, ONO Pharmaceutical, Parkinson Study Group, Pharma2B, Praxis, Revance, Roche, Sage, Sanofi, Scion, Stoparkinson, Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc, Sun Pharma, Supernus, Teva, Theravance, Transposon, UCB. Dr. Phillips: Dr. Phillips has no conflicts of interest to declare. Dr. Jimenez-Shahed: Dr. Jimenez-Shahed has received research grants from Annovis Bio, Sage Therapeutics, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, and The Michael J. Fox Foundation; consulting fees from Medtronic, AbbVie, AlphaOmega, Teva, Nuvelution, and Signant Health; service on data safety monitoring board for BlueRock Therapuetics and Emalex; advisory board for PhotoPharmics.

The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) is used to recognize patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and rate its severity. The rating is crucial for disease progression monitoring and treatment adjustment. This study aims to advance the capabilities of PD management by developing an innovative framework that integrates deep learning with wearable sensor technology to enhance the precision of UPDRS assessments. We introduce a series of deep learning models to estimate UPDRS Part III scores, utilizing motion data from wearable sensors. Our approach leverages a novel Multi-shared-task Self-supervised Convolutional Neural Network-Long Short-Term Memory (CNN-LSTM) framework that processes raw gyroscope signals and their spectrogram representations. This technique aims to refine the estimation accuracy of PD severity during naturalistic human activities. Utilizing 526 min of data from 24 PD patients engaged in everyday activities, our methodology demonstrates a strong correlation of 0.89 between estimated and clinically assessed UPDRS-III scores. This model outperforms the benchmark set by single and multichannel CNN, LSTM, and CNN-LSTM models and establishes a new standard in UPDRS-III score estimation for free-body movements compared to recent state-of-the-art methods. These results signify a substantial step forward in bioengineering applications for PD monitoring, providing a robust framework for reliable and continuous assessment of PD symptoms in daily living settings.

Background: Deutetrabenazine is approved for adults with tardive dyskinesia (TD). Data based on underlying psychiatric condition and baseline dopamine receptor antagonist (DRA) use are limited., Methods: Patients with TD who completed parent studies ARM-TD or AIM-TD were eligible for the 3-year, open-label extension study (RIM-TD; NCT02198794). In RIM-TD, deutetrabenazine was titrated based on dyskinesia control and tolerability. In this post hoc analysis of RIM-TD, total motor Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) score and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed by underlying condition and DRA use at parent study baseline., Results: Of 343 patients enrolled in RIM-TD, 336 were included in the analysis by underlying condition, and 337 were included in the analysis by DRA use. One hundred eighty-nine of 205 (92%) patients with psychotic disorders (schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder) and 65 of 131 (50%) with mood and other disorders (depression/bipolar disorder/other) were receiving a DRA. Mean (SE) deutetrabenazine doses at week 145 were 40.4 (1.13), 38.5 (1.21), 39.9 (1.00), and 38.5 (1.48) mg/d for patients with psychotic disorders, those with mood and other disorders, and those receiving DRAs or not, respectively. Mean (SD) changes in total motor AIMS score from this study baseline to week 145 were -6.3 (4.53), -7.1 (4.92), -6.1 (4.42), and -7.5 (5.19). Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (number of AEs/patient-years) of AEs were similar across groups: any (1.02, 1.71, 1.08, 1.97), serious (0.10, 0.12, 0.10, 0.12), and leading to discontinuation (0.07, 0.05, 0.06, 0.05)., Conclusions: Long-term deutetrabenazine provided clinically meaningful improvements in TD-related movements, with a favorable benefit-risk profile, regardless of underlying condition or DRA use., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Introduction: Deutetrabenazine is a vesicular monoamine transporter 2 inhibitor used to treat tardive dyskinesia (TD) and chorea associated with Huntington disease (HD). To enhance detection of safety signals across individual trials, integrated safety analyses of deutetrabenazine in TD and HD chorea were conducted., Methods: For TD, safety data were integrated from two 12-week pivotal studies (ARM-TD and AIM-TD) and through week 15 of the open-label extension (OLE) study (RIM-TD). Data were analyzed by deutetrabenazine treatment group and placebo. For HD, safety data were integrated from the 12-week pivotal study (First-HD) and through week 15 of the OLE study (ARC-HD) for patients previously receiving placebo. Integrated deutetrabenazine data were compared with placebo from the pivotal study., Results: For TD, deutetrabenazine (n = 384) was generally well tolerated compared with placebo (n = 130). Adverse event (AE) incidence was numerically higher in the response-driven deutetrabenazine vs the fixed-dose deutetrabenazine and placebo groups, respectively (any AE, 59.5% vs 44.4-50.0% and 53.8%; treatment-related AE, 38.1% vs 18.1-25.0% and 30.8%). Serious AEs were reported for 2.8-8.3% of patients in the deutetrabenazine groups and 6.9% in the placebo group. Common AEs (≥ 4%) included headache, somnolence, nausea, anxiety, fatigue, dry mouth, and diarrhea. AE incidence was higher during the titration vs maintenance periods. For HD, AE incidence was numerically higher with deutetrabenazine (n = 84) vs placebo (n = 45; any AE, 64.3% vs 60.0%; treatment-related AE, 38.1% vs 26.7%); serious AEs were reported for similar proportions for the deutetrabenazine and placebo groups, 2.4% and 2.2%, respectively. Common AEs (≥ 4%) included irritability, fall, depression, dry mouth, and fatigue., Conclusions: Data from an integrated analysis of studies in TD and an integrated analysis of studies of chorea in HD showed that deutetrabenazine has a favorable safety profile and is well tolerated across indications., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT02291861, NCT02195700, NCT01795859, NCT02198794, NCT01897896., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been established as an effective neuromodulatory treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD) with motor complications or refractory tremor. Various DBS devices with unique technology platforms are commercially available and deliver continuous, open-loop stimulation. The Percept™ family of neurostimulators use BrainSense™ technology with five key features to sense local field potentials while stimulating, enabling integration of physiologic data into the routine practice of DBS programming. The newly approved Percept™ rechargeable RC implantable pulse generator offers a smaller, thinner design and reduced recharge time with prolonged recharge interval. In this review, we describe the application of local field potential sensing-based programming in PD and highlight the potential future clinical implementation of closed-loop stimulation using the Percept™ RC implantable pulse generator.

Introduction: Device-aided therapy may improve the quality of life (QoL) for people with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) and poorly controlled symptoms with oral therapy. MANAGE-PD is a validated tool classifying patients based on symptom control and advanced treatment eligibility. This study focused on patient/caregiver reported outcomes and healthcare resource utilization among patients grouped by MANAGE-PD categories., Methods: Device-aided therapy-naïve patients receiving oral treatments were identified from the Adelphi Parkinson's Disease Programme. Patients were categorized (category 1 to 3) using MANAGE-PD. PD-specific QoL (PDQ-39), care partner burden (ZBI), satisfaction with current treatment, healthcare resource utilization, associated healthcare costs, and future treatment discussion with providers were measured. Categories were compared using ANOVA, t-test, chi square and adjusted regression analyses., Results: Of the analytical sample (n = 2709), 18.9% were inadequately controlled on current therapy and potentially eligible for device-aided therapies (category 3). As expected, they had worse patient/caregiver reported outcomes versus patients in categories 1 or 2. However, the degree of difference in healthcare resource utilization, including: greater number of hospitalizations, emergency room (ER) visits and consultations, higher likelihood of being recipients of respite care, and greater PD treatment burden, was unexpected. Importantly, of patients in category 3 and their care partners, >40% did not report discussions with providers about device-aided therapies., Conclusion: MANAGE-PD category 3 patients had significantly higher burden on healthcare resources versus patients well-controlled with oral treatment or requiring only oral medication adjustments; yet almost half had no discussion on device-aided therapies with providers. Device-aided therapies may be considered in these patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest No conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Tourette syndrome (TS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by motor and phonic tics., Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of deutetrabenazine (Teva Neuroscience, Inc, Parsippany, NJ), a vesicular monoamine transporter 2 inhibitor, in children and adolescents with TS., Methods: Alternatives for Reducing Tics in TS (ARTISTS) open-label extension (OLE) (NCT03567291) was a 54-week, global, phase 3, open-label extension study of deutetrabenazine (6-48 mg daily) conducted May 28, 2018 to April 3, 2020 with a 2-week randomized withdrawal period. Participants (6-16 years of age) had TS and active tics causing distress or impairment. Safety (primary outcome) was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and clinical laboratory testing. Efficacy was measured by the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale-Total Tic Score (YGTSS-TTS)., Results: The intent-to-treat population (228 participants; mean age, 12.0 years; 79.8% male; 86.4% white) had a median (range) duration of exposure of 28.4 (0.3-52.9) weeks. Of 227 participants in the safety analysis, 161 (70.9%) reported ≥1 TEAE (exposure-adjusted incidence rate, 2.77/patient-year), of which 95 (41.9%) were treatment related. The most frequently reported TEAEs were headaches, somnolence, nasopharyngitis, weight increases, and anxiety. No additional safety signals were observed. Worsening of YGTSS-TTS after the 2-week randomized withdrawal was not statistically significant (least squares mean difference, -0.4; P  = 0.78). Several exploratory measures showed sustained improvement throughout the treatment periods., Conclusions: In this long-term, open-label trial, deutetrabenazine was well tolerated with low frequency of TEAEs. There was no significant difference in tics between treatment arms during the 2-week randomized withdrawal period, however, descriptive statistics and comparison with baseline showed a numeric improvement in tics, quality of life, and other measures., (© 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.)

Objective: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus interna (GPi) have differential therapeutic effects for Parkinson's disease (PD) that drive patient selection. For example, GPi DBS is preferred for dystonic features and dyskinesia, whereas STN DBS has shown faster tremor control and medication reduction. Connectivity studies comparing these two targets, using patient-specific data, are still lacking. The objective was to find STN and GPi structural connectivity patterns in order to better understand differences in DBS-activated brain circuits between these two stimulation targets and to guide optimal contact selection., Methods: The authors simulated DBS activation along the main axis of both the STN and GPi by using volume of activated tissue (VAT) modeling with known average stimulation parameters (2.8 V and 60 μsec for STN; 3.3 V and 90 μsec for GPi). The authors modeled VATs in the anterior, middle, and posterior STN and the anterior, midanterior, midposterior, and posterior GPi. The authors generated maps of the connections shared by the patients for each VAT by using probabilistic tractography of diffusion-weighted imaging data obtained in 46 PD patients who underwent DBS (26 with STN and 20 with GPi targeting), and differences between VATs for whole-brain and distal regions of interest (prefrontal cortex, supplementary motor area, primary motor cortex, primary sensory cortex, caudate, motor thalamus, and cerebellum) were generated from structural atlases. Differences between maps were quantified and compared., Results: VATs across the STN and GPi had different structural connectivity patterns. The authors found significant connectivity differences between VATs for all regions of interest. Posterior and middle STN showed stronger connectivity to the primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area (SMA) (p < 0.001). Posterior STN had the strongest connectivity to the primary sensory cortex and motor thalamus (p < 0.001). Posterior GPi showed stronger connectivity to the primary motor cortex (p < 0.001). Connectivity to the SMA was similar for the posterior and midposterior GPi (p > 0.05), which was greater than that for the anterior GPi (p < 0.001). When both nuclei were compared, posterior and middle STN had stronger connectivity to the SMA, cerebellum, and motor thalamus than GPi (all p < 0.001). Posterior GPi and STN had similar connectivity to the primary sensory cortex., Conclusions: On patient-specific imaging, structural connectivity differences existed between GPi and STN DBS, as measured with standardized electrical field modeling of the DBS targets. These connectivity differences may correlate with the differential clinical benefits obtained by targeting each of the two nuclei with DBS for PD. Prospective work is needed to relate these differences to clinical outcomes and to inform targeting and programming.

Introduction: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD), but its efficacy is tied to DBS programming, which is often time consuming and burdensome for patients, caregivers, and clinicians. Our aim is to test whether the Mobile Application for PD DBS (MAP DBS), a clinical decision support system, can improve programming., Methods: We conducted an open-label, 1:1 randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial comparing six months of SOC standard of care (SOC) to six months of MAP DBS-aided programming. We enrolled patients between 30 and 80 years old who received DBS to treat idiopathic PD at six expert centers across the United States. The primary outcome was time spent DBS programming and secondary outcomes measured changes in motor symptoms, caregiver strain and medication requirements., Results: We found a significant reduction in initial visit time (SOC: 43.8 ± 28.9 min n = 37, MAP DBS: 27.4 ± 13.0 min n = 35, p = 0.001). We did not find a significant difference in total programming time between the groups over the 6-month study duration. MAP DBS-aided patients experienced a significantly larger reduction in UPDRS III on-medication scores (-7.0 ± 7.9) compared to SOC (-2.7 ± 6.9, p = 0.01) at six months., Conclusion: MAP DBS was well tolerated and improves key aspects of DBS programming time and clinical efficacy., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest There are potential conflicts of interested related to Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Abbott, who are the device manufacturers who produced the DBS systems implanted in the study subjects. The University of Florida has received grants from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Abbott, but the authors have financial interest in these grants. ARZ serves as a consultant for Medtronic and Boston Scientific. IUH has performed research for Boston Scientific, and has consulted for Boston Scientific and Medtronic. JLO has received grant support from Boston Scientific and Medtronic, has consulted for Medtronic and Abbott, and received non-financial research support from Boston Scientific. MSS has received grant support from Boston Scientific, and honoraria/nonfinancial support as a scientific advisor from Boston Scientific. As the director of the Movement Disorders Fellowship at the University of Florida, CWH has received industry grants for educational support for the fellowship program that are paid directly to the University of Florida and used solely for fellow salary support from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Abbott. MHP has received consultation fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Abbot. MSL has received consulting fees from Boston Scientific. CRB has received consulting feeds from Boston Scientific and Abbott, and he holds intellectual property related to DBS. KDF has received occasional consulting fees from Medtronic and Boston Scientific for DBS related work. University of Florida has received implantable devices for KDF's DBS-related research, but not for this trial, from Medtronic. The University of Florida receives partial funding for KDF's functional neurosurgery fellowship from Medtronic. KDF holds three DBS related patents for which he has received no royalties. KDF has participated as a site implanting surgeon in multicenter DBS-related research studies sponsored by Abbott and Boston Scientific. MV has received consultation fees from Medtronic. PZ has received honorariums as a consultant and part of an advisory panel with Medtronic. JJS has received research support from Medtronic and Abbott, and has received consulting fees from Medtronic, Abbott, and, Boston Scientific. MSO, EM, BJL, CCA, SC, AT, GD, JLW, CG, AB, NN, DS, JC, MH, MA, and AS have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

This paper expands upon a session, entitled, "Special Challenges in Pediatric Drug Development," that was presented as part of a two-day meeting on Pediatric Drug Development at the International Society for Central Nervous System (CNS) Clinical Trials and Methodology (ISCTM) Autumn Conference in Boston, Massachusetts, in October 2020. Drug development in this age group is particularly important because many illnesses have their onset in this age group, many other illnesses that are more common in adults also occur in this time period, and many rare conditions that require special consideration (i.e., orphan conditions) are commonly detected in childhood as well. The special challenges addressed by our speakers in this session were cognitive and functional capacity assessment, challenges of recruitment and assessment of children for research and development of appropriate biomarkers for use in child populations, and the special challenges in training raters to address symptoms in pediatric populations. The speakers have written summaries of their talks. The session's lead chair was Philip D. Harvey, PhD, who wrote introductory and closing comments. This paper should serve as an expert-informed reference to those interested in and involved in addressing the special challenges facing those involved in CNS pediatric drug development., Competing Interests: DISCLOSURES: Dr. Harvey has received consulting fees or travel reimbursements from Alkermes, Bio Excel, Boehringer Ingelheim, Karuna Pharma, Merck Pharma, Minerva Pharma, and Sunovion (DSP)Pharma in the past year. He receives royalties from the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (Owned by WCG Verasci, Inc. and contained in the MCCB). He is chief scientific officer of i-Function, Inc. and Scientific Consultant to EMA Wellness, Inc. Dr. Pandina is a full-time employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, and a Johnson & Johnson stockholder. Dr. Busner is a full-time employee of Signant Health and may own stock/stock equity. Dr. Jimenez-Shahed is a consultant for Teva, Nuvelution, and Signant Health. Drs. Taylor and Grabb have no conflicts of interest related to the content of this article., (Copyright © 2023. Matrix Medical Communications. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Published reports on directional deep brain stimulation (DBS) have been limited to small, single-center investigations. Therapeutic window (TW) is used to describe the range of stimulation amplitudes achieving symptom relief without side effects. This crossover study performed a randomized double-blind assessment of TW for directional and omnidirectional DBS in a large cohort of patients implanted with a DBS system in the subthalamic nucleus for Parkinson's disease., Materials and Methods: Participants received omnidirectional stimulation for the first three months after initial study programming, followed by directional DBS for the following three months. The primary endpoint was a double-blind, randomized evaluation of TW for directional vs omnidirectional stimulation at three months after initial study programming. Additional data recorded at three- and six-month follow-ups included stimulation preference, therapeutic current strength, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III motor score, and quality of life., Results: The study enrolled 234 subjects (62 ± 8 years, 33% female). TW was wider using directional stimulation in 183 of 202 subjects (90.6%). The mean increase in TW with directional stimulation was 41% (2.98 ± 1.38 mA, compared to 2.11 ± 1.33 mA for omnidirectional). UPDRS part III motor score on medication improved 42.4% at three months (after three months of omnidirectional stimulation) and 43.3% at six months (after three months of directional stimulation) with stimulation on, compared to stimulation off. After six months, 52.8% of subjects blinded to stimulation type (102/193) preferred the period with directional stimulation, and 25.9% (50/193) preferred the omnidirectional period. The directional period was preferred by 58.5% of clinicians (113/193) vs 21.2% (41/193) who preferred the omnidirectional period., Conclusion: Directional stimulation yielded a wider TW compared to omnidirectional stimulation and was preferred by blinded subjects and clinicians., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The collection of Parkinson's Disease (PD) time-series data usually results in imbalanced and incomplete datasets due to the geometric distribution of PD complications' sever-ity scores. Consequently, when training deep convolutional models on these datasets, the models suffer from overfitting and lack generalizability to unseen data. In this paper, we investigated a new framework of Conditional Generative Ad-versarial Netuwoks (cGANs) as a solution to improve the extrapolation and generalizability of the regression models in such datasets. We used a real-world PD dataset to esti-mate Dyskinesia severity in patients with PD. The developed cGAN demonstrated significantly better generalizability to unseen data samples than a traditional Convolutional Neural Network with an improvement of 34%. This solution can be applied in similar imbalanced time-series data, especially in the healthcare domain, where balanced and uniformly distributed data samples are not readily available.

Physical activity recognition in patients with Parkinson's Disease (PwPD) is challenging due to the lack of large-enough and good quality motion data for PwPD. A common approach to this obstacle involves the use of models trained on better quality data from healthy patients. Models can struggle to generalize across these domains due to motor complications affecting the movement patterns in PwPD and differences in sensor axes orientations between data. In this paper, we investigated the generalizability of a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) model trained on a young, healthy population to PD, and the role of data augmentation on alleviating sensor position variability. We used two publicly available healthy datasets - PAMAP2 and MHEALTH. Both datasets had sensor placements on the chest, wrist, and ankle with 9 and 10 subjects, respectively. A private PD dataset was utilized as well. The proposed CNN model was trained on PAMAP2 in k-fold cross-validation based on the number of subjects, with and without data augmentation, and tested directly on MHEALTH and PD data. Without data augmentation, the trained model resulted in 48.16% accuracy on MHEALTH and 0% on the PD data when directly applied with no model adaptation techniques. With data augmentation, the accuracies improved to 87.43% and 44.78%, respectively, indicating that the method compensated for the potential sensor placement variations between data. Clinical Relevance- Wearable sensors and machine learning can provide important information about the activity level of PwPD. This information can be used by the treating physician to make appropriate clinical interventions such as rehabilitation to improve quality of life.

Background: Deutetrabenazine is a vesicular monoamine transporter 2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia (TD) in adults. In two 12-week pivotal studies, deutetrabenazine demonstrated statistically significant improvements in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) scores, with favorable safety/tolerability in TD patients. This study reports long-term efficacy and safety of deutetrabenazine in a 3-year, single-arm, open-label extension (OLE) study., Methods: Patients who completed the pivotal studies could enroll in this single-arm OLE study, titrating up to 48 mg/day based on dyskinesia control and tolerability. Efficacy was assessed based on change from baseline in total motor AIMS score, Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and quality of life (QOL) assessments. Safety evaluation included adverse event (AE) incidence, reported using exposure-adjusted incidence rates, and safety scales., Results: 343 patients enrolled in the study (6 patients were excluded). At Week 145 (mean dose: 39.4 ± 0.83 mg/day), mean ± SE change from baseline in total motor AIMS score was -6.6 ± 0.37 and 67% of patients achieved ≥50% improvement in total motor AIMS score. Based on CGIC and PGIC, 73% and 63% of patients achieved treatment success, respectively. QOL improvements were also observed. Deutetrabenazine was generally well tolerated, with low rates of mild-to-moderate AEs and no new safety signals; most safety scales remained unchanged over time., Conclusions: Long-term deutetrabenazine treatment was associated with sustained improvement in AIMS scores, indicative of clinically meaningful long-term benefit, and was generally well tolerated. Results suggest deutetrabenazine may provide increasing benefit over time without increases in dose., Competing Interests: RH has served as a consultant for Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, AbbVie Inc., Acorda Therapeutics, Adamas Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Biotie Therapies, Cynapsus Therapeutics, Impax Laboratories, Inc., Lundbeck LLC, the Michael J. Fox Foundation, Neurocrine Biosciences, Neuropore Therapies, Pfizer Inc., Prexton Therapeutics, US WorldMeds, Guidepoint Global, Gerson Lehrman Group, LCN Consulting, Putnam Associates, National Parkinson Foundation, eResearch Technology, Inc., Sarepta Therapeutics, Back Bay Life Science, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Projects in Knowledge, Vista Research, LifeMax, PeerView Press, ClinicalMind Medical and Therapeutic Communications, Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Academy for Continued Healthcare Learning, Outcomes Insights, Expert Connect, HealthLOGIX, Cowen and Company, Pharma Two B Ltd., RMEI Medical Education for Better Outcomes, ClearView Healthcare Partners, Health Advances, Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development, Inc., Quintiles, and Eli Lilly and Company. HB is an employee of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. HF has received honoraria from Prime Education, Inc., International Parkinson and Movement Disorders Society, Carling Communications, Medscape (speaker in CME events), AbbVie Inc., Biogen, GE Healthcare, inVentiv, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Lundbeck LLC, Merz Pharmaceuticals, Voyager, Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, and Pfizer Inc. (as a consultant); grant and research support from AbbVie Inc., Acadia, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Biotie Therapies/Acorda Therapeutics, Civitas, Kyowa/ProStrakan, the Michael J. Fox Foundation, International Parkinson and Movement Disorders Society, NIH/NINDS, Parkinson Study Group, Rhythm, and Synosia; royalties from Demos Publishing (serving as a book author/editor); and a stipend from the International Parkinson and Movement Disorders Society (MDS) for serving as a medical editor of the MDS website. The Cleveland Clinic has a contract with Teva Pharmaceutical Industries for Dr. Fernandez's role as a co-principal investigator in SD-809 tardive dyskinesia global studies. HF also serves as a member of the publication committee for Acorda Therapeutics but does not receive any personal compensation for this work. HF has no owner interest in any pharmaceutical company. SF has received honoraria from Neurocrine Biosciences, Lundbeck LLC, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Avanir, UCB, US WorldMeds, Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, and Adamas Pharmaceuticals; research support from Ipsen, Medtronic, Auspex, US WorldMeds, Pharm-Olam, Cynapsus Therapeutics/Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Vaccinex, Solstice, CHDI Foundation, the Michael J. Fox Foundation, and the NIH; and royalties from Demos and Blackwell Futura. JJ-S has received consulting fees from Medtronic, St. Jude Medical, Boston Scientific, Blue Rock Therapeutics, Bracket Global, Teva, Nuvelution, CNS Ratings, AbbVie, Spark Therapeutics, Revance, Amneal, and Impel. NG is an employee of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. LM is an employee of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. AW is a former employee of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. JA is a former employee of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. MG is an employee of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. J-MS is a former employee of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. KA has served as a scientific advisor for LEGATO-HD, AIM-TD, ARM-TD, ENROLL-HD, and Prana; site principal investigator for PRIDE-HD, First-HD, ARC-HD, ENROLL-HD, and Vaccinex; and consultant for the NeuroNEXT 105 study. KA has received salary support from the Griffin Foundation and honoraria from Vindico Medical Education. The authors declare that this study received funding from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Tel Aviv, Israel. The funder had the following involvement in the study: design, collection of data, analysis and interpretation of the data, review and drafting of the manuscript., (Copyright © 2022 Hauser, Barkay, Fernandez, Factor, Jimenez-Shahed, Gross, Marinelli, Wilhelm, Alexander, Gordon, Savola and Anderson.)

Background: Patient groups traditionally affected by health disparities were less likely to use video teleneurology (TN) care during the initial COVID-19 pandemic surge in the United States. Whether this asymmetry persisted later in the pandemic or was accompanied with a loss of access to care remains unknown., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using patient data from a multicenter healthcare system in New York City. We identified all established pediatric or adult neurology patients with at least two prior outpatient visits between June 16th, 2019 and March 15th, 2020 using our electronic medical record. For this established pre-COVID cohort, we identified telephone, in-person, video TN or emergency department visits and hospital admissions for any cause between March 16th and December 15th, 2020 ("COVID period"). We determined clinical, sociodemographic, income, and visit characteristics. Our primary outcome was video TN utilization, and our main secondary outcome was loss to follow-up during the COVID period. We used multivariable logistic regression to model the relationship between patient-level characteristics and both outcomes., Results: We identified 23,714 unique visits during the COVID period, which corresponded to 14,170 established patients from our institutional Neurology clinics during the pre-COVID period. In our cohort, 4,944 (34.9%) utilized TN and 4,997 (35.3%) were entirely lost to follow-up during the COVID period. In the adjusted regression analysis, Black or African-American race [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.60, 97.5%CI 0.52-0.70], non-English preferred language (aOR 0.49, 97.5%CI 0.39-0.61), Medicaid insurance (aOR 0.50, 97.5%CI 0.44-0.57), and Medicare insurance (aOR 0.73, 97.5%CI 0.65-0.83) had decreased odds of TN utilization. Older age (aOR 0.98, 97.5%CI 0.98-0.99), female sex (aOR 0.90 97.5%CI 0.83-0.99), and Medicaid insurance (aOR 0.78, 0.68-0.90) were associated with decreased odds of loss to follow-up., Conclusion: In the first 9 months of the COVID-19 pandemic, we found sociodemographic patterns in TN utilization that were similar to those found very early in the pandemic. However, these sociodemographic characteristics were not associated with loss to follow-up, suggesting that lack of TN utilization may not have coincided with loss of access to care., Competing Interests: BK has received consulting fees from MD Aware and serves on the scientific advisory board of Syntrillo. JJ-S has received research support from the Michael J Fox Foundation and Impax Laboratories; she has served as consultant for Medtronic, Signant Health, St. Jude Medical, Abbvie, Teva, Spark Therapeutics, and Revance; she has served on the data safety monitoring committee of Blue Rock Therapeutics. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Kummer, Agarwal, Sweetnam, Robinson-Papp, Blank, Katz Sand, Naasan, Palmese, Jimenez-Shahed, Grant, Patterson, Navis, Stein and Jetté.)

Background: The burden of Parkinson's disease (PD) worsens with disease progression. However, the lack of objective and uniform disease classification challenges our understanding of the incremental burden in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (APD) and suboptimal medication control. The 5-2-1 criteria was proposed by clinical consensus to identify patients with advancing PD. Our objective was to evaluate the screening accuracy and incremental clinical burden, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and humanistic burden in PD patients meeting the 5-2-1 screening criteria., Methods: Data were drawn from the Adelphi Parkinson's Disease Specific Program (DSP™), a multi-country point-in-time survey (2017-2020). People with PD who were naive to device-aided therapy and on oral PD therapy were included. Patients meeting the 5-2-1 screening criteria had one or more of the three clinical indicators of APD: (i) ≥5 doses of oral levodopa/day, OR (ii) "off" symptoms for ≥2 h of waking day, OR (iii) ≥1 h of troublesome dyskinesia. Clinician assessment of PD stage was used as the reference in this study. Clinical screening accuracy of the 5-2-1 criteria was assessed using area under the curve and multivariable logistic regression models. Incremental clinical, HCRU, and humanistic burden were assessed by known-group comparisons between 5 and 2-1-positive and negative patients., Results: From the analytic sample (n = 4714), 33% of patients met the 5-2-1 screening criteria. Among physician-classified APD patients, 78.6% were 5-2-1 positive. Concordance between clinician judgment and 5-2-1 screening criteria was > 75%. 5-2-1-positive patients were nearly 7-times more likely to be classified as APD by physician judgment. Compared with the 5-2-1-negative group, 5-2-1-positive patients had significantly higher clinical, HCRU, and humanistic burden across all measures. In particular, 5-2-1-positive patients had 3.8-times more falls, 3.6-times higher annual hospitalization rate, and 3.4-times greater dissatisfaction with PD treatment. 5-2-1-positive patients also had significantly lower quality of life and worse caregiver burden., Conclusions: 5-2-1 criteria demonstrated potential as a screening tool for identifying people with APD with considerable clinical, humanistic, and HCRU burden. The 5-2-1 screening criteria is an objective and reliable tool that may aid the timely identification and treatment optimization of patients inadequately controlled on oral PD medications., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Although essential tremor is common, its underlying pathophysiology remains uncertain, and several hypotheses seek to explain the tremor mechanism. The GABA hypothesis states that disinhibition of deep cerebellar neurons due to reduced GABAergic input from Purkinje cells results in increased pacemaker activity, leading to rhythmic output to the thalamo-cortical circuit and resulting in tremor. However, some neuroimaging, spectroscopy, and pathology studies have not shown a clear or consistent GABA deficiency in essential tremor, and animal models have indicated that large reductions of Purkinje cell inhibition may improve tremor. Instead, tremor is increasingly attributable to dysfunction in oscillating networks, where altered (but not necessarily reduced) inhibitory signaling can result in tremor. Hypersynchrony of Purkinje cell activity may account for excessive oscillatory cerebellar output, with potential contributions along multiple sites of the olivocerebellar loop. Although older animal tremor models, such as harmaline tremor, have explored contributions from the inferior olivary body, increasing evidence has pointed to the role of aberrant climbing fiber synaptic organization in oscillatory cerebellar activity and tremor generation. New animal models such as hotfoot17j mice, which exhibit abnormal climbing fiber organization due to mutations in Grid2, have recapitulated many features of ET. Similar abnormal climbing fiber architecture and excessive cerebellar oscillations as measured by EEG have been found in humans with essential tremor. Further understanding of hypersynchrony and excessive oscillatory activity in ET phenotypes may lead to more targeted and effective treatment options., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We sought to explore current perspectives and attitudes of general neurologists and movement disorder specialists toward deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson disease (PD), focusing on perspectives on its earlier use in the clinical course of the disease., Methods: We designed a 30-question online survey comprised of Likert-type, multiple choice, and rank-order questions, which was distributed to 932 neurologist members of the American Academy of Neurology. We analyzed clinicians' sociodemographic information, treatment patterns used for patients with PD, reasons for and against patient referral for DBS, and general attitudes toward DBS. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics., Results: We received 164/930 completed surveys (completion rate of 18%). Overall, most respondents agreed that DBS was more useful after the appearance of motor complications and that DBS utilization offered better management of PD than medication alone. However, respondents were divided on issues like minimum duration of disease needed to consider DBS as a treatment option and timing of DBS referral relative to disease progression. Specifically, differences between movement disorder specialists and general neurologists were seen in medication management of symptoms and dyskinesia., Conclusions: There remains a lack of consensus on several aspects of DBS, including medical management before offering DBS and the appropriate timing of its consideration for patients. Given the effect of such lack of consensus on patients' outcomes and recent evidence on positive DBS results, it is essential to update DBS professional guidelines with a focus on medical management and the timely use of DBS., (© 2021 American Academy of Neurology.)

Introduction: Making Informed Decisions to Aid Timely Management of Parkinson's Disease (MANAGE-PD) is a clinician-reported tool designed to facilitate timely identification and management of patients with advancing Parkinson's disease (PD) with suboptimal symptom control while on standard therapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the validity and clinical value of the tool., Methods: Driven by structured inputs from a steering committee and panel of PD experts, the tool was developed to classify patients into 3 categories. Validity and clinical value were elucidated using a two-pronged approach: (i) hypothetical patient vignettes (n = 10) developed based on the MANAGE-PD tool and rated by 17 PD specialists and 400 general neurologists (GN) and (ii) patients with PD (n = 2546) managed in real-world clinical settings. Vignette validity was based on concordance between PD experts' clinical judgement and MANAGE-PD vignette categorization. Patient-level data was used for known-group comparisons (validity) and discordant pair analysis (clinical value)., Results: The tool demonstrated strong validity and clinical value among PD specialists (intraclass coefficient [ICC] 0.843; Fleiss weighted kappa [ƙ weighted ] 0.79) and GN (ICC 0.690; ƙ weighted 0.65) using patient vignettes. MANAGE-PD also demonstrated real-world validity and clinical value based on ability to identify patients with incrementally higher clinical, economic, and humanistic PD burden across categories of the tool (p < 0.01)., Conclusions: MANAGE-PD demonstrated robust validity and clinical value in identifying patients with suboptimal PD symptom control. Clinical use of MANAGE-PD may complement treatment decision-making and facilitate timely and comprehensive management of patients with advancing PD., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The initial COVID-19 pandemic shutdown led to the canceling of elective surgeries throughout most of the USA and Canada., Objective: This survey was carried out on behalf of the Parkinson Study Group (PSG) to understand the impact of the shutdown on deep brain stimulation (DBS) practices in North America., Methods: A survey was distributed through RedCap® to the members of the PSG Functional Neurosurgical Working Group. Only one member from each site was asked to respond to the survey. Responses were collected from May 15 to June 6, 2020., Results: Twenty-three sites participated; 19 (83%) sites were from the USA and 4 (17%) from Canada. Twenty-one sites were academic medical centers. COVID-19 associated DBS restrictions were in place from 4 to 16 weeks. One-third of sites halted preoperative evaluations, while two-thirds of the sites offered limited preoperative evaluations. Institutional policy was the main contributor for the reported practice changes, with 87% of the sites additionally reporting patient-driven surgical delays secondary to pandemic concerns. Pre-post DBS associated management changes affected preoperative assessments 96%; electrode placement 87%; new implantable pulse generator (IPG) placement 83%; IPG replacement 65%; immediate postoperative DBS programming 74%; and routine DBS programming 91%., Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic related shutdown resulted in DBS practice changes in almost all North American sites who responded to this large survey. Information learned could inform development of future contingency plans to reduce patient delays in care under similar circumstances., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Tourette syndrome is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by childhood onset of motor and phonic tics; treatments for tics are associated with safety concerns. Deutetrabenazine is a selective vesicular monoamine transporter 2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of chorea associated with Huntington disease and tardive dyskinesia in adults., Objective: To examine whether deutetrabenazine is effective and safe for the treatment of Tourette syndrome in children and adolescents., Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 2/3, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-titration study included children and adolescents (aged 6-16 years) with Tourette syndrome with active tics causing distress or impairment (ie, Yale Global Tic Severity Scale-Total Tic Score [YGTSS-TTS] ≥20). The trial was conducted over 12 weeks, with 1 week of follow-up from February 2018 to November 2019 at 36 centers in the United States, Canada, Denmark, Russia, Serbia, and Spain. Data analysis was conducted from January 31 to April 22, 2020., Intervention: Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive deutetrabenazine or placebo, titrated during 7 weeks to an optimal level, followed by a 5-week maintenance period. The maximum total daily deutetrabenazine dose was 48 mg/d., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline to week 12 in YGTSS-TTS. Key secondary end points included changes in Tourette Syndrome-Clinical Global Impression, Tourette Syndrome-Patient Global Impression of Impact, and Child and Adolescent Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome-Quality of Life Activities of Daily Living subscale score. Safety was assessed based on treatment-emergent adverse events, vital signs, questionnaires, and laboratory parameters., Results: A total of 119 participants were randomized to deutetrabenazine (59 participants; mean [SD] age, 11.5 [2.5] years; 53 [90%] boys; 49 [83%] White; 3 [5%] Black) and placebo (60 participants; mean [SD] age, 11.5 [2.6] years; 51 [85%] boys; 53 [88%] White; 3 [5%] Black). At week 12, the difference in YGTSS-TTS score was not significant between deutetrabenazine and placebo (least squares mean difference, -0.7; 95% CI, -4.1 to 2.8; P = .69; Cohen d, -0.07). There were no nominally significant differences between groups for key secondary end points. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported for 38 patients (66%) and 33 patients (56%) receiving deutetrabenazine and placebo, respectively, and were generally mild or moderate., Conclusions and Relevance: In this study of deutetrabenazine in children and adolescents with Tourette syndrome, the primary efficacy end point was not met. No new safety signals were identified. These results may be informative for future studies of treatments for tics in Tourette syndrome., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03452943.

Importance: Tourette syndrome is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by childhood onset of motor and phonic tics, often accompanied by behavioral and psychiatric comorbidities. Deutetrabenazine is a vesicular monoamine transporter 2 inhibitor approved in the US for the treatment of chorea associated with Huntington disease and tardive dyskinesia., Objective: To report results of the ARTISTS 2 (Alternatives for Reducing Tics in Tourette Syndrome 2) study examining deutetrabenazine for treatment of Tourette syndrome., Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, fixed-dose study was conducted over 8 weeks with a 1-week follow-up (June 21, 2018, to December 9, 2019). Children and adolescents aged 6 to 16 years with a diagnosis of Tourette syndrome and active tics causing distress or impairment were enrolled in the study. Children were recruited from 52 sites in 10 countries. Data were analyzed from February 4 to April 22, 2020., Interventions: Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to low-dose deutetrabenazine (up to 36 mg/d), high-dose deutetrabenazine (up to 48 mg/d), or a matching placebo, which were titrated over 4 weeks to the target dose followed by a 4-week maintenance period., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline to week 8 in the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale-Total Tic Score (YGTSS-TTS) for high-dose deutetrabenazine. Key secondary end points included changes in YGTSS-TTS for low-dose deutetrabenazine, Tourette Syndrome Clinical Global Impression score, Tourette Syndrome Patient Global Impression of Impact score, and Child and Adolescent Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome-Quality of Life Activities of Daily Living subscale score. Safety assessments included incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events, laboratory parameters, vital signs, and questionnaires., Results: The study included 158 children and adolescents (mean [SD] age, 11.7 [2.6] years). A total of 119 participants (75%) were boys; 7 (4%), Asian; 1 (1%), Black; 32 (20%), Hispanic; 4 (3%), Native American; 135 (85%), White; 2 (1%), multiracial; 9 (6%), other race; and 1 (0.6%), of unknown ethnic origin. Fifty-two participants were randomized to the high-dose deutetrabenazine group, 54 to the low-dose deutetrabenazine group, and 52 to the placebo group. Baseline characteristics for participants were similar between groups. Of the total 158 participants, 64 (41%) were aged 6 to 11 years, and 94 (59%) were aged 12 to 16 years at baseline. Mean time since Tourette syndrome diagnosis was 3.3 (2.8) years, and mean baseline YGTSS-TTS was 33.8 (6.6) points. At week 8, the difference in YGTSS-TTS was not significant between the high-dose deutetrabenazine and placebo groups (least-squares mean difference, -0.8 points; 95% CI, -3.9 to 2.3 points; P = .60; Cohen d, -0.11). There were no nominally significant differences between groups for key secondary end points. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported for 34 participants (65%) treated with high-dose deutetrabenazine, 24 (44%) treated with low-dose deutetrabenazine, and 25 (49%) treated with placebo and were generally mild or moderate., Conclusions and Relevance: In this fixed-dose randomized clinical trial of deutetrabenazine in children and adolescents with Tourette syndrome, the primary efficacy end point was not met. No new safety signals were identified., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03571256.

Importance: Urate elevation, despite associations with crystallopathic, cardiovascular, and metabolic disorders, has been pursued as a potential disease-modifying strategy for Parkinson disease (PD) based on convergent biological, epidemiological, and clinical data., Objective: To determine whether sustained urate-elevating treatment with the urate precursor inosine slows early PD progression., Design, Participants, and Setting: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial of oral inosine treatment in early PD. A total of 587 individuals consented, and 298 with PD not yet requiring dopaminergic medication, striatal dopamine transporter deficiency, and serum urate below the population median concentration (<5.8 mg/dL) were randomized between August 2016 and December 2017 at 58 US sites, and were followed up through June 2019., Interventions: Inosine, dosed by blinded titration to increase serum urate concentrations to 7.1-8.0 mg/dL (n = 149) or matching placebo (n = 149) for up to 2 years., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was rate of change in the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS; parts I-III) total score (range, 0-236; higher scores indicate greater disability; minimum clinically important difference of 6.3 points) prior to dopaminergic drug therapy initiation. Secondary outcomes included serum urate to measure target engagement, adverse events to measure safety, and 29 efficacy measures of disability, quality of life, cognition, mood, autonomic function, and striatal dopamine transporter binding as a biomarker of neuronal integrity., Results: Based on a prespecified interim futility analysis, the study closed early, with 273 (92%) of the randomized participants (49% women; mean age, 63 years) completing the study. Clinical progression rates were not significantly different between participants randomized to inosine (MDS-UPDRS score, 11.1 [95% CI, 9.7-12.6] points per year) and placebo (MDS-UPDRS score, 9.9 [95% CI, 8.4-11.3] points per year; difference, 1.26 [95% CI, -0.59 to 3.11] points per year; P = .18). Sustained elevation of serum urate by 2.03 mg/dL (from a baseline level of 4.6 mg/dL; 44% increase) occurred in the inosine group vs a 0.01-mg/dL change in serum urate in the placebo group (difference, 2.02 mg/dL [95% CI, 1.85-2.19 mg/dL]; P<.001). There were no significant differences for secondary efficacy outcomes including dopamine transporter binding loss. Participants randomized to inosine, compared with placebo, experienced fewer serious adverse events (7.4 vs 13.1 per 100 patient-years) but more kidney stones (7.0 vs 1.4 stones per 100 patient-years)., Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients recently diagnosed as having PD, treatment with inosine, compared with placebo, did not result in a significant difference in the rate of clinical disease progression. The findings do not support the use of inosine as a treatment for early PD., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02642393.

Levodopa-induced dyskinesias are abnormal involuntary movements experienced by the majority of persons with Parkinson's disease (PwP) at some point over the course of the disease. Choreiform as the most common phenomenology of levodopa-induced dyskinesias can be managed by adjusting the dose/frequency of PD medication(s) based on a PwP's motor fluctuations over a typical day. We developed a sensor-based assessment system to provide such information. We used movement data collected from the upper and lower extremities of 15 PwPs along with a deep recurrent model to estimate dyskinesia severity as they perform different activities of daily living (ADL). Subjects performed a variety of ADLs during a 4-h period while their dyskinesia severity was rated by the movement disorder experts. The estimated dyskinesia severity scores from our model correlated highly with the expert-rated scores (r = 0.87 (p < 0.001)), which was higher than the performance of linear regression that is commonly used for dyskinesia estimation (r = 0.81 (p < 0.001)). Our model provided consistent performance at different ADLs with minimum r = 0.70 (during walking) to maximum r = 0.84 (drinking) in comparison to linear regression with r = 0.00 (walking) to r = 0.76 (cutting food). These findings suggest that when our model is applied to at-home sensor data, it can provide an accurate picture of changes of dyskinesia severity facilitating effective medication adjustments.