Search

Your search keyword '"Jo, Jae‐Seong"' showing total 21 results
Start Over Author "Jo, Jae‐Seong"
21 results on '"Jo, Jae‐Seong"'

7. Fog Agents in Distributed Multi Agent System for Autonomous Energy Management

Author

Na, Ui-Kyun, Kim, Young-Gon, Jo, Jae-Seong, Lee, Eun-Kyu, Angrisani, Leopoldo, Series Editor, Arteaga, Marco, Series Editor, Panigrahi, Bijaya Ketan, Series Editor, Chakraborty, Samarjit, Series Editor, Chen, Jiming, Series Editor, Chen, Shanben, Series Editor, Chen, Tan Kay, Series Editor, Dillmann, Ruediger, Series Editor, Duan, Haibin, Series Editor, Ferrari, Gianluigi, Series Editor, Ferre, Manuel, Series Editor, Hirche, Sandra, Series Editor, Jabbari, Faryar, Series Editor, Jia, Limin, Series Editor, Kacprzyk, Janusz, Series Editor, Khamis, Alaa, Series Editor, Kroeger, Torsten, Series Editor, Liang, Qilian, Series Editor, Ming, Tan Cher, Series Editor, Minker, Wolfgang, Series Editor, Misra, Pradeep, Series Editor, Möller, Sebastian, Series Editor, Mukhopadhyay, Subhas, Series Editor, Ning, Cun-Zheng, Series Editor, Nishida, Toyoaki, Series Editor, Pascucci, Federica, Series Editor, Qin, Yong, Series Editor, Seng, Gan Woon, Series Editor, Veiga, Germano, Series Editor, Wu, Haitao, Series Editor, Zhang, Junjie James, Series Editor, Hwang, Seong Oun, editor, Tan, Syh Yuan, editor, and Bien, Franklin, editor

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

8. Performance Evaluation of LoRaWAN on Campus Environment

Author

Kim, Dong Hoon, Jo, Jae-Seong, Lee, Eun-Kyu, Angrisani, Leopoldo, Series Editor, Arteaga, Marco, Series Editor, Panigrahi, Bijaya Ketan, Series Editor, Chakraborty, Samarjit, Series Editor, Chen, Jiming, Series Editor, Chen, Shanben, Series Editor, Chen, Tan Kay, Series Editor, Dillmann, Ruediger, Series Editor, Duan, Haibin, Series Editor, Ferrari, Gianluigi, Series Editor, Ferre, Manuel, Series Editor, Hirche, Sandra, Series Editor, Jabbari, Faryar, Series Editor, Jia, Limin, Series Editor, Kacprzyk, Janusz, Series Editor, Khamis, Alaa, Series Editor, Kroeger, Torsten, Series Editor, Liang, Qilian, Series Editor, Ming, Tan Cher, Series Editor, Minker, Wolfgang, Series Editor, Misra, Pradeep, Series Editor, Möller, Sebastian, Series Editor, Mukhopadhyay, Subhas, Series Editor, Ning, Cun-Zheng, Series Editor, Nishida, Toyoaki, Series Editor, Pascucci, Federica, Series Editor, Qin, Yong, Series Editor, Seng, Gan Woon, Series Editor, Veiga, Germano, Series Editor, Wu, Haitao, Series Editor, Zhang, Junjie James, Series Editor, Hwang, Seong Oun, editor, Tan, Syh Yuan, editor, and Bien, Franklin, editor

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

18. Utility of ultrasound evaluation of I‐Gel® placement in children: An observational study.

Author

Ahn, Jin Hee, Park, Jiyeon, Ryu, kyoung Ho, Jo, Jae Seong, Kang, Ryung A., Ko, Justin Sangwook, Hahm, Tae Soo, Jeong, Ji Seon, and von Ungern‐Sternberg, Britta S

Subjects
ULTRASONIC imaging, CHILD patients, SCIENTIFIC observation, AIRWAY (Anatomy), GENERAL anesthesia, ELECTIVE surgery, CONFIDENCE intervals
Abstract

Background: Ultrasound is not widely used to evaluate optimal supraglottic airway positioning even though it could potentially be used to identify and correct problem areas. Aims: We evaluated a new ultrasound scoring method to identify the position of the supraglottic airway and detect the location of air leaks during ventilation in pediatric patients. Methods: Using a prospective observational study design, we enrolled 90 pediatric patients of ASA physical status I–III scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. After anesthesia induction, patients were assigned to a noncorrection group or a correction group after their first ultrasound evaluation. Noncorrection group comprised patients with tolerable I‐Gel positioning based on ultrasound evaluation and no problems with clinical parameters, while the correction group comprised patients with I‐Gel mispositioning based on ultrasound. Results: After the first ultrasound evaluation, 61 patients did not need I‐Gel correction (noncorrection group), while 29 patients needed I‐Gel correction (correction group) and underwent a second ultrasound evaluation. Airway sealing pressure and total ultrasound score showed a negative correlation (r = −.845, p <.001). The area under the receiver operating curve for total ultrasound score was 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.94–0.99; p <.001). In the correction group, ultrasound score and ventilation parameters improved after correction based on ultrasound evaluation. Conclusions: Ultrasound scores were negatively correlated with airway sealing pressure in pediatric patients. Ultrasound evaluation is useful for detecting misplacement of the I‐Gel and can be a useful tool for correction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

19. The frequency of gastroesophageal reflux when radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation under general anesthesia with a supraglottic device: Observational pilot study.

Author

Jin Hee Ahn, Jiyeon Park, Jae Seong Jo, Sung Hyun Lee, Young Keun On, Kyoung-Min Park, Eun Jeong Oh, Justin Sangwook Ko, Ji Seon Jeong, Ahn, Jin Hee, Park, Jiyeon, Jo, Jae Seong, Lee, Sung Hyun, On, Young Keun, Park, Kyoung-Min, Oh, Eun Jeong, Ko, Justin Sangwook, and Jeong, Ji Seon

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

21. Utility of ultrasound evaluation of I-Gel ® placement in children: An observational study.

Author

Ahn JH, Park J, Ryu KH, Jo JS, Kang RA, Ko JS, Hahm TS, and Jeong JS

Subjects
Airway Management, Anesthesia, General, Child, Elective Surgical Procedures, Humans, Intubation, Intratracheal, Laryngeal Masks
Abstract

Background: Ultrasound is not widely used to evaluate optimal supraglottic airway positioning even though it could potentially be used to identify and correct problem areas., Aims: We evaluated a new ultrasound scoring method to identify the position of the supraglottic airway and detect the location of air leaks during ventilation in pediatric patients., Methods: Using a prospective observational study design, we enrolled 90 pediatric patients of ASA physical status I-III scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. After anesthesia induction, patients were assigned to a noncorrection group or a correction group after their first ultrasound evaluation. Noncorrection group comprised patients with tolerable I-Gel positioning based on ultrasound evaluation and no problems with clinical parameters, while the correction group comprised patients with I-Gel mispositioning based on ultrasound., Results: After the first ultrasound evaluation, 61 patients did not need I-Gel correction (noncorrection group), while 29 patients needed I-Gel correction (correction group) and underwent a second ultrasound evaluation. Airway sealing pressure and total ultrasound score showed a negative correlation (r = -.845, p < .001). The area under the receiver operating curve for total ultrasound score was 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.94-0.99; p < .001). In the correction group, ultrasound score and ventilation parameters improved after correction based on ultrasound evaluation., Conclusions: Ultrasound scores were negatively correlated with airway sealing pressure in pediatric patients. Ultrasound evaluation is useful for detecting misplacement of the I-Gel and can be a useful tool for correction., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results