Search

The α-arrestin ARRDC3 is a recently discovered tumor suppressor in invasive breast cancer that functions as a multi-faceted adaptor protein to control protein trafficking and cellular signaling. However, the molecular mechanisms which control ARRDC3 function are unknown. Other arrestins are known to be regulated by post-translational modifications, suggesting that ARRDC3 may be subject to similar regulatory mechanisms. Here we report that ubiquitination is a key regulator of ARRDC3 function and is mediated primarily by two proline-rich PPXY motifs in the ARRDC3 C-tail domain. Ubiquitination and the PPXY motifs are essential for ARRDC3 function in regulating GPCR trafficking and signaling. Additionally, ubiquitination and the PPXY motifs mediate ARRDC3 protein degradation, dictate ARRDC3 subcellular localization, and are required for interaction with the NEDD4-family E3 ubiquitin ligase WWP2. These studies demonstrate a role for ubiquitination in regulating ARRDC3 function and reveal a mechanism by which ARRDC3 divergent functions are controlled.

Endolysosomal defects in neurons are central to the pathogenesis of prion and other neurodegenerative disorders. In prion disease, prion oligomers traffic through the multivesicular body (MVB) and are routed for degradation in lysosomes or for release in exosomes, yet how prions impact proteostatic pathways is unclear. We found that prion-affected human and mouse brain showed a marked reduction in Hrs and STAM1 (ESCRT-0), which route ubiquitinated membrane proteins from early endosomes into MVBs. To determine how the reduction in ESCRT-0 impacts prion conversion and cellular toxicityin vivo, we prion-challenged conditional knockout mice (male and female) havingHrsdeleted from neurons, astrocytes, or microglia. The neuronal, but not astrocytic or microglial, Hrs-depleted mice showed a shortened survival and an acceleration in synaptic derangements, including an accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins, deregulation of phosphorylated AMPA and metabotropic glutamate receptors, and profoundly altered synaptic structure, all of which occurred later in the prion-infected control mice. Finally, we found that neuronal Hrs (nHrs) depletion increased surface levels of the cellular prion protein, PrPC, which may contribute to the rapidly advancing disease through neurotoxic signaling. Taken together, the reduced Hrs in the prion-affected brain hampers ubiquitinated protein clearance at the synapse, exacerbates postsynaptic glutamate receptor deregulation, and accelerates neurodegeneration.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTPrion diseases are rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disorders characterized by prion aggregate spread through the central nervous system. Early disease features include ubiquitinated protein accumulation and synapse loss. Here, we investigate how prion aggregates alter ubiquitinated protein clearance pathways (ESCRT) in mouse and human prion-infected brain, discovering a marked reduction in Hrs. Using a prion-infection mouse model with neuronal Hrs (nHrs) depleted, we show that low neuronal Hrs is detrimental and markedly shortens survival time while accelerating synaptic derangements, including ubiquitinated protein accumulation, indicating that Hrs loss exacerbates prion disease progression. Additionally, Hrs depletion increases the surface distribution of prion protein (PrPC), linked to aggregate-induced neurotoxic signaling, suggesting that Hrs loss in prion disease accelerates disease through enhancing PrPC-mediated neurotoxic signaling.

Proteinase-activated receptors (PARs, nomenclature as agreed by the NC-IUPHAR Subcommittee on Proteinase-activated Receptors [39]) are unique members of the GPCR superfamily activated by proteolytic cleavage of their amino terminal exodomains. Agonist proteinase-induced hydrolysis unmasks a tethered ligand (TL) at the exposed amino terminus, which acts intramolecularly at the binding site in the body of the receptor to effect transmembrane signalling. TL sequences at human PAR1-4 are SFLLRN-NH2, SLIGKV-NH2, TFRGAP-NH2 and GYPGQV-NH2, respectively. With the exception of PAR3, synthetic peptides with these sequences (as carboxyl terminal amides) are able to act as agonists at their respective receptors. Several proteinases, including neutrophil elastase, cathepsin G and chymotrypsin can have inhibitory effects at PAR1 and PAR2 such that they cleave the exodomain of the receptor without inducing activation of Gαq-coupled calcium signalling, thereby preventing activation by activating proteinases but not by agonist peptides. Neutrophil elastase (NE) cleavage of PAR1 and PAR2 can however activate MAP kinase signaling by exposing a TL that is different from the one revealed by trypsin [87]. PAR2 activation by NE regulates inflammation and pain responses [115, 76] and triggers mucin secretion from airway epithelial cells [116].

SIGNIFICANCE: Adaptor proteins control the spatiotemporal dynamics of cellular signaling. Dysregulation of adaptor protein function can cause aberrant cell signaling and promote cancer. The arrestin family of adaptor proteins are known to regulate signaling by the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The GPCRs are highly druggable and implicated in cancer progression. However, the molecular mechanisms responsible for arrestin dysregulation and the impact on GPCR function in cancer have yet to be fully elucidated. RECENT ADVANCES: A new family of mammalian arrestins, termed the α-arrestins, was recently discovered. The α-arrestin, arrestin domain-containing protein 3 (ARRDC3), in particular, has been identified as a tumor suppressor and is reported to control cellular signaling of GPCRs in cancer. CRITICAL ISSUES: Compared with the extensively studied mammalian β-arrestins, there is limited information regarding the regulatory mechanisms that control α-arrestin activation and function. Here, we discuss the molecular mechanisms that regulate ARRDC3, which include post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation and ubiquitination. We also provide evidence that ARRDC3 can interact with a wide array of proteins that control diverse biological functions. FUTURE DIRECTIONS: ARRDC3 interacts with numerous proteins and is likely to display diverse functions in cancer, metabolic disease, and other syndromes. Thus, understanding the regulatory mechanisms of ARRDC3 activity in various cellular contexts is critically important. Recent studies suggest that α-arrestins may be regulated through post-translational modification, which is known to impact adaptor protein function. However, additional studies are needed to determine how these regulatory mechanisms affect ARRDC3 tumor suppressor function. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 36, 1066–1079.

Thecoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has created unprecedented obstacles for new investigators to traverse. The pandemic's impact exacerbates inequities for groups historically excluded from science. We provide recommendations to support junior faculty, including women and faculty from groups historically excluded from science, in establishing laboratories during the pandemic and foreseeable future.

Introduction: Mentorship is critical for faculty success, satisfaction, and engagement. However, many faculty, particularly underrepresented racial/ethnic (UR) faculty, lack access to high-quality mentoring. In an effort to improve mentoring for all faculty, we developed and implemented a formally structured faculty mentor training program (FMTP) across UC San Diego Health Sciences, which included institutional support, mentorship training, and department/division mentorship programs. Methods: FMTP impact was evaluated using three primary outcome variables: mentoring quality, mentoring behaviors, and institutional climate. Participants’ self-assessed mentoring competencies were measured using validated instruments. Results: A total of 391 (23%) of Health Sciences faculty participated in FMTP. Participation rate was higher for women than men (30% versus 17%) and highest for UR faculty (39%). FMTP was implemented in 16 of 19 departments. Self-reported mentoring improved for FMTP participants with mentoring quality (p = 0.009) and meeting mentees’ expectations (p = 0.01) continuing to improve for up to 2 years after training. However, participants were unsure if they were meeting UR mentees’ expectations. FMTP participants were significantly more satisfied with mentoring quality (p < 0.001) compared to non-participants, with the greatest increase in satisfaction reported by UR faculty (38–61%). UR faculty reported improved overall morale (51–61%) and a perception that the environment was supportive for UR faculty (48–70%). Conclusion: The implementation of a system-wide formal structured FMTP was associated with improved faculty satisfaction, quality of mentoring, and institutional climate, especially for UR faculty.

Endothelial dysfunction is associated with vascular disease and results in disruption of endothelial barrier function and increased sensitivity to apoptosis. Currently, there are limited treatments for improving endothelial dysfunction. Activated protein C (aPC), a promising therapeutic, signals via protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR1) and mediates several cytoprotective responses, including endothelial barrier stabilization and anti-apoptotic responses. We showed that aPC-activated PAR1 signals preferentially via β-arrestin-2 (β-arr2) and dishevelled-2 (Dvl2) scaffolds rather than G proteins to promote Rac1 activation and barrier protection. However, the signaling pathways utilized by aPC/PAR1 to mediate anti-apoptotic activities are not known. aPC/PAR1 cytoprotective responses also require coreceptors; however, it is not clear how coreceptors impact different aPC/PAR1 signaling pathways to drive distinct cytoprotective responses. Here, we define a β-arr2-mediated sphingosine kinase-1 (SphK1)-sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor-1 (S1PR1)-Akt signaling axis that confers aPC/PAR1-mediated protection against cell death. Using human cultured endothelial cells, we found that endogenous PAR1 and S1PR1 coexist in caveolin-1 (Cav1)-rich microdomains and that S1PR1 coassociation with Cav1 is increased by aPC activation of PAR1. Our study further shows that aPC stimulates β-arr2-dependent SphK1 activation independent of Dvl2 and is required for transactivation of S1PR1-Akt signaling and protection against cell death. While aPC/PAR1-induced, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) activation is also dependent on β-arr2, neither SphK1 nor S1PR1 are integrated into the ERK1/2 pathway. Finally, aPC activation of PAR1-β-arr2-mediated protection against apoptosis is dependent on Cav1, the principal structural protein of endothelial caveolae. These studies reveal that different aPC/PAR1 cytoprotective responses are mediated by discrete, β-arr2-driven signaling pathways in caveolae.

Vascular inflammation causes endothelial barrier disruption and tissue edema. Several inflammatory mediators act through G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs), including protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR1), to elicit inflammatory responses. The activation of PAR1 by its ligand thrombin stimulates proinflammatory, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling that promotes endothelial barrier disruption. Through mass spectrometry phosphoproteomics, we identified heat shock protein 27 (HSP27), which exists as a large oligomer that binds to actin, as a promising candidate for the p38-mediated regulation of barrier integrity. Depletion of HSP27 by siRNA enhanced endothelial cell barrier permeability and slowed recovery after thrombin stimulation. We further showed that two effector kinases of p38 MAPK, MAPKAPK2 (MK2) and MAPKAPK3 (MK3), differentially phosphorylated HSP27 at Ser(15), Ser(78), and Ser(82). Whereas inhibition of thrombin-stimulated p38 activation blocked HSP27 phosphorylation at all three sites, inhibition of MK2 reduced the phosphorylation of only Ser(15) and Ser(78). Inhibition of both MK2 and MK3 was necessary to attenuate Ser(82) phosphorylation. Thrombin-stimulated p38-MK2-MK3 signaling induced HSP27 oligomer disassembly. However, a phosphorylation-deficient mutant of HSP27 exhibited defective oligomer disassembly and altered the dynamics of barrier recovery after thrombin stimulation. Moreover, blocking HSP27 oligomer reassembly with the small-molecule inhibitor J2 enhanced endothelial barrier permeability in vitro and vascular leakage in vivo in response to PAR1 activation. These studies reveal the distinct regulation of HSP27 phosphorylation and function induced by the GPCR-stimulated p38-MK2-MK3 signaling axis that controls the dynamics of endothelial barrier recovery in vitro and vascular leakage in vivo.

Proteinase-activated receptors (PARs, nomenclature as agreed by the NC-IUPHAR Subcommittee on Proteinase-activated Receptors [39]) are unique members of the GPCR superfamily activated by proteolytic cleavage of their amino terminal exodomains. Agonist proteinase-induced hydrolysis unmasks a tethered ligand (TL) at the exposed amino terminus, which acts intramolecularly at the binding site in the body of the receptor to effect transmembrane signalling. TL sequences at human PAR1-4 are SFLLRN-NH2, SLIGKV-NH2, TFRGAP-NH2 and GYPGQV-NH2, respectively. With the exception of PAR3, synthetic peptides with these sequences (as carboxyl terminal amides) are able to act as agonists at their respective receptors. Several proteinases, including neutrophil elastase, cathepsin G and chymotrypsin can have inhibitory effects at PAR1 and PAR2 such that they cleave the exodomain of the receptor without inducing activation of Gαq-coupled calcium signalling, thereby preventing activation by activating proteinases but not by agonist peptides. Neutrophil elastase (NE) cleavage of PAR1 and PAR2 can however activate MAP kinase signaling by exposing a TL that is different from the one revealed by trypsin [82]. PAR2 activation by NE regulates inflammation and pain responses [111, 72] and triggers mucin secretion from airway epithelial cells [112].

The α-arrestin domain containing protein 3 (ARRDC3) is a tumor suppressor in triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC), a highly metastatic subtype of breast cancer that lacks targeted therapies. Thus, understanding the mechanisms and targets of ARRDC3 in TNBC is important. ARRDC3 regulates trafficking of protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1, also known as F2R), a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) implicated in breast cancer metastasis. Loss of ARRDC3 causes overexpression of PAR1 and aberrant signaling. Moreover, dysregulation of GPCR-induced Hippo signaling is associated with breast cancer progression. However, the mechanisms responsible for Hippo dysregulation remain unknown. Here, we report that the Hippo pathway transcriptional co-activator TAZ (also known as WWTR1) is the major effector of GPCR signaling and is required for TNBC migration and invasion. Additionally, ARRDC3 suppresses PAR1-induced Hippo signaling via sequestration of TAZ, which occurs independently of ARRDC3-regulated PAR1 trafficking. The ARRDC3 C-terminal PPXY motifs and TAZ WW domain are crucial for this interaction and are required for suppression of TNBC migration and lung metastasis in vivo. These studies are the first to demonstrate a role for ARRDC3 in regulating GPCR-induced TAZ activity in TNBC and reveal multi-faceted tumor suppressor functions of ARRDC3. This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.

G-coupled protein receptors (GPCRs) comprise the largest class of druggable targets. Signaling by GPCRs is initiated from subcellular hot spots including the plasma membrane, signalosomes, and endosomes to contribute to vascular inflammation. GPCR-G protein signaling at the plasma membrane causes endothelial barrier disruption and also cross-talks with growth factor receptors to promote proinflammatory signaling. A second surge of GPCR signaling is initiated by cytoplasmic NFκB activation mediated by β-arrestins and CARMA-BCL10-MALT1 signalosomes. Once internalized, ubiquitinated GPCRs initiate signaling from endosomes via assembly of the transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase binding protein-1 (TAB1)-TAB2-p38 MAPK complex to promote vascular inflammation. Understanding the complexities of GPCR signaling is critical for development of new strategies to treat vascular inflammation such as that associated with COVID-19.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a large family comprising >800 signaling receptors that regulate numerous cellular and physiologic responses. GPCRs have been implicated in numerous diseases and represent the largest class of drug targets. Although advances in GPCR structure and pharmacology have improved drug discovery, the regulation of GPCR function by diverse post-translational modifications (PTMs) has received minimal attention. Over 200 PTMs are known to exist in mammalian cells, yet only a few have been reported for GPCRs. Early studies revealed phosphorylation as a major regulator of GPCR signaling, whereas later reports implicated a function for ubiquitination, glycosylation, and palmitoylation in GPCR biology. Although our knowledge of GPCR phosphorylation is extensive, our knowledge of the modifying enzymes, regulation, and function of other GPCR PTMs is limited. In this review we provide a comprehensive overview of GPCR post-translational modifications with a greater focus on new discoveries. We discuss the subcellular location and regulatory mechanisms that control post-translational modifications of GPCRs. The functional implications of newly discovered GPCR PTMs on receptor folding, biosynthesis, endocytic trafficking, dimerization, compartmentalized signaling, and biased signaling are also provided. Methods to detect and study GPCR PTMs as well as PTM crosstalk are further highlighted. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of the implications of GPCR PTMs in human disease and their importance for drug discovery. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Post-translational modification of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) controls all aspects of receptor function; however, the detection and study of diverse types of GPCR modifications are limited. A thorough understanding of the role and mechanisms by which diverse post-translational modifications regulate GPCR signaling and trafficking is essential for understanding dysregulated mechanisms in disease and for improving and refining drug development for GPCRs.

The mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) integrates growth, nutrient and energy status cues to control cell growth and metabolism. While mTORC1 activation at the lysosome is well characterized, it is not clear how this complex is regulated at other subcellular locations. Here, we combine location-selective kinase inhibition, live-cell imaging and biochemical assays to probe the regulation of growth factor-induced mTORC1 activity in the nucleus. Using a nuclear targeted Akt Substrate-based Tandem Occupancy Peptide Sponge (Akt-STOPS) that we developed for specific inhibition of Akt, a critical upstream kinase, we show that growth factor-stimulated nuclear mTORC1 activity requires nuclear Akt activity. Further mechanistic dissection suggests that nuclear Akt activity mediates growth factor-induced nuclear translocation of Raptor, a regulatory scaffolding component in mTORC1, and localization of Raptor to the nucleus results in nuclear mTORC1 activity in the absence of growth factor stimulation. Taken together, these results reveal a mode of regulation of mTORC1 that is distinct from its lysosomal activation, which controls mTORC1 activity in the nuclear compartment., The role of mTORC1 at the lysosome is well established, but mTORC1 is known to be active in other cellular locations. Here, the authors develop Akt-STOPS to inhibit Akt specifically in the nucleus and identify a new regulatory mode for mTORC1 distinct in the nucleus.

The mechanisms mediating suppression of reproduction in response to decreased nutrient availability remain undefined, with studies suggesting regulation occurs within the hypothalamus, pituitary, or gonads. By manipulating glucose utilization and GLUT1 expression in a pituitary gonadotrope cell model and in primary gonadotropes, we show GLUT1-dependent stimulation of glycolysis, but not mitochondrial respiration, by the reproductive neuropeptide GnRH. GnRH stimulation increases gonadotrope GLUT1 expression and translocation to the extracellular membrane. Maximal secretion of the gonadotropin Luteinizing Hormone is supported by GLUT1 expression and activity, and GnRH-induced glycolysis is recapitulated in primary gonadotropes. GLUT1 expression increases in vivo during the GnRH-induced ovulatory LH surge and correlates with GnRHR. We conclude that the gonadotropes of the anterior pituitary sense glucose availability and integrate this status with input from the hypothalamus via GnRH receptor signaling to regulate reproductive hormone synthesis and secretion.

A variety of different signals induce specific responses through a common, extracellular-signal regulated kinase (ERK)-dependent cascade. It has been suggested that signaling specificity can be achieved through precise temporal regulation of ERK activity. Given the wide distrubtion of ERK susbtrates across different subcellular compartments, it is important to understand how ERK activity is temporally regulated at specific subcellular locations. To address this question, we have expanded the toolbox of Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)-based ERK biosensors by creating a series of improved biosensors targeted to various subcellular regions via sequence specific motifs to measure spatiotemporal changes in ERK activity. Using these sensors, we showed that EGF induces sustained ERK activity near the plasma membrane in sharp contrast to the transient activity observed in the cytoplasm and nucleus. Furthermore, EGF-induced plasma membrane ERK activity involves Rap1, a noncanonical activator, and controls cell morphology and EGF-induced membrane protrusion dynamics. Our work strongly supports that spatial and temporal regulation of ERK activity is integrated to control signaling specificity from a single extracellular signal to multiple cellular processes.

Author(s): Nicholas, Dequina; Knight, Vashti; Tonsfeldt, Karen; Terasaka, Tomohiro; Molinar-Inglis, Olivia; Stephens, Shannon Brooke Zoe; Trejo, Joann; Kauffman, Alexander S; Mellon, Pamela L; Lawson, Mark A | Abstract: Abstract Reproduction requires intensive energy expenditure, and energy availability impacts the function of the reproductive endocrine HPG-axis. Accordingly, the reproductive axis is suppressed during hypoglycemia. Circulating blood glucose can directly interact with gonadotropes within the highly vascular pituitary. Therefore, it is possible that gonadotropes may sense energy availability via the presence of glucose in the circulation and integrate this status with input from GnRH neurons to regulate hormone production. Gonadotropes dominantly express glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) and increase glucose uptake in response to GnRH. Thus, we hypothesized that gonadotropes engage glycolysis in response to GnRH stimulation due to the high energy demand of protein synthesis required for LH production. We developed an approach to sort and successfully culture primary gonadotropes from wild type mice. Using this approach, we performed extracellular flux analysis and found that gonadotropes respond to GnRH by inducing GLUT1-mediated glycolysis that is independent of mitochondrial respiration. Knock-down of GLUT1 expression in the LβT2 gonadotrope cell line, glucose restriction, or treatment with the competitive inhibitor of glycolysis, 2-DG, diminished GnRH-induced LH secretion, indicating GLUT1 expression is necessary for maximal GnRH-induced LH secretion. We confirmed this observation in primary female mouse gonadotropes by limiting glucose availability which resulted in diminished basal LH and FSH secretion. Lastly, GLUT1 expression in the pituitary correlates with GnRH receptor expression and is increased during the LH surge in a mouse model. These results implicate glucose uptake through GLUT1 as permissive for gonadotrope secretion of LH and therefore reproductive function, especially the LH surge. We conclude that GLUT1-mediated glucose uptake is an important rate-limiting step in gonadotropin synthesis and operation of the HPG-axis.

Thrombin, a procoagulant protease, cleaves and activates protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR1) to promote inflammatory responses and endothelial dysfunction. In contrast, activated protein C (APC), an anticoagulant protease, activates PAR1 through a distinct cleavage site and promotes anti-inflammatory responses, prosurvival, and endothelial barrier stabilization. The distinct tethered ligands formed through cleavage of PAR1 by thrombin versus APC result in unique active receptor conformations that bias PAR1 signaling. Despite progress in understanding PAR1 biased signaling, the proteins and pathways utilized by thrombin versus APC signaling to induce opposing cellular functions are largely unknown. Here, we report the global phosphoproteome induced by thrombin and APC signaling in endothelial cells with the quantification of 11,266 unique phosphopeptides using multiplexed quantitative mass spectrometry. Our results reveal unique dynamic phosphoproteome profiles of thrombin and APC signaling, an enrichment of associated biological functions, including key modulators of endothelial barrier function, regulators of gene transcription, and specific kinases predicted to mediate PAR1 biased signaling. Using small interfering RNA to deplete a subset of phosphorylated proteins not previously linked to thrombin or APC signaling, a function for afadin and adducin-1 actin binding proteins in thrombin-induced endothelial barrier disruption is unveiled. Afadin depletion resulted in enhanced thrombin-promoted barrier permeability, whereas adducin-1 depletion completely ablated thrombin-induced barrier disruption without compromising p38 signaling. However, loss of adducin-1 blocked APC-induced Akt signaling. These studies define distinct thrombin and APC dynamic signaling profiles and a rich array of proteins and biological pathways that engender PAR1 biased signaling in endothelial cells.

The 21st century is nearly two decades old, and the faculty ranks at our educational institutions remain sparsely diverse. While educational institutions are continually being challenged to increase the diversity of their faculty, progress is slow. This essay offers a perspective on the importance of diversity in our educational institutions as well as on the traditional metrics that our institutions use to evaluate faculty in hiring, promotion, and tenure. I also reflect on how my life experiences as a person of color provided me with the skills needed to succeed as an academic in science and inspired me to dedicate myself to work to increase the representation of women and people of color in science and in our educational institutions to create an inclusive environment for all members of the scientific community.

Vascular inflammation and thrombosis require the concerted actions of several different agonists, many of which act on G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). GPCR dimerization is a well-established phenomenon that can alter protomer function. In platelets and other cell types, protease-activated receptor-4 (PAR4) has been shown to dimerize with the purinergic receptor P2Y12 to coordinate β-arrestin–mediated Akt signaling, an important mediator of integrin activation. However, the mechanism by which the PAR4-P2Y12 dimer controls β-arrestin–dependent Akt signaling is not known. We now report that PAR4 and P2Y12 heterodimer internalization is required for β-arrestin recruitment to endosomes and Akt signaling. Using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer, immunofluorescence microscopy, and co-immunoprecipitation in cells expressing receptors exogenously and endogenously, we demonstrate that PAR4 and P2Y12 specifically interact and form dimers expressed at the cell surface. We also found that activation of PAR4 but not of P2Y12 drives internalization of the PAR4-P2Y12 heterodimer. Remarkably, activated PAR4 internalization was required for recruitment of β-arrestin to endocytic vesicles, which was dependent on co-expression of P2Y12. Interestingly, stimulation of the PAR4-P2Y12 heterodimer promotes β-arrestin and Akt co-localization to intracellular vesicles. Moreover, activated PAR4-P2Y12 internalization is required for sustained Akt activation. Thus, internalization of the PAR4-P2Y12 heterodimer is necessary for β-arrestin recruitment to endosomes and Akt signaling and lays the foundation for examining whether blockade of PAR4 internalization reduces integrin and platelet activation.

Proteinase-activated receptors (PARs, nomenclature as agreed by the NC-IUPHAR Subcommittee on Proteinase-activated Receptors [35]) are unique members of the GPCR superfamily activated by proteolytic cleavage of their amino terminal exodomains. Agonist proteinase-induced hydrolysis unmasks a tethered ligand (TL) at the exposed amino terminus, which acts intramolecularly at the binding site in the body of the receptor to effect transmembrane signalling. TL sequences at human PAR1-4 are SFLLRN-NH2, SLIGKV-NH2, TFRGAP-NH2 and GYPGQV-NH2, respectively. With the exception of PAR3, synthetic peptides with these sequences (as carboxyl terminal amides) are able to act as agonists at their respective receptors. Several proteinases, including neutrophil elastase, cathepsin G and chymotrypsin can have inhibitory effects at PAR1 and PAR2 such that they cleave the exodomain of the receptor without inducing activation of Gαq-coupled calcium signalling, thereby preventing activation by activating proteinases but not by agonist peptides. Neutrophil elastase (NE) cleavage of PAR1 and PAR2 can however activate MAP kinase signaling by exposing a TL that is different from the one revealed by trypsin [73]. PAR2 ectivation by NE regulates inflammation and pain responses [101, 65] and triggers mucin secretion from airway epithelial cells [102].

Endothelial dysfunction is induced by inflammatory mediators including multiple G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) agonists. However, the GPCR signaling pathways that promote endothelial dysfunction are incompletely understood. We previously showed that thrombin promotes endothelial barrier disruption through autophosphorylation and activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) via a non-canonical transforming growth factor-β–activated protein kinase-1–binding protein-1 (TAB1) and TAB2–dependent pathway rather than the canonical three-tiered kinase cascade. Here, we sought to determine whether other GPCR agonists stimulate p38 MAPK activation via this non-canonical pathway in human endothelial cells derived from different vascular beds. Using primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), HUVEC-derived EA.hy926 cells, and human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (HDMECs), we found that both non-canonical and canonical p38 activation pathways components are expressed in these various endothelial cell types, including TAB3, a structurally-related TAB2 homolog. Moreover, multiple GPCRs agonists, including thrombin, histamine, prostaglandin E(2), and ADP, stimulated robust p38 autophosphorylation, whereas phosphorylation of the upstream MAPKs MAP kinase kinase 3 (MKK3) and MKK6, was virtually undetectable, indicating that non-canonical p38 activation may exist for other GPCRs. Indeed, in EA.hy926 cells, thrombin- and histamine-stimulated p38 activation depended on TAB1–TAB2, whereas in primary HUVECs, both TAB1–TAB2 and TAB1–TAB3 were required for p38 activation. In HDMECs, thrombin-induced p38 activation depended on TAB1–TAB3, but histamine-induced p38 activation required TAB1–TAB2. Moreover, thrombin- and histamine-stimulated interleukin-6 production required both TAB1–TAB2 and TAB1–TAB3 in HUVEC. We conclude that multiple GPCR agonists utilize non-canonical TAB1–TAB2 and TAB1–TAB3–dependent p38 activation to promote endothelial inflammatory responses.

There is a national call for academic medicine to use evidence-based initiatives to improve its culture and climate. The authors report data-driven policy and programmatic interventions that were associated with increased faculty diversity, equity, respectful behavior and improved faculty climate, at UC San Diego Health Sciences. Methods Based on demographic and survey data, interventions were designed to improve the climate between 2005 and 2015. Interventions included routine measuring and dissemination of demographic data, changes and dissemination of policy and procedures, and new and improved faculty development programming. Impact was measured using demographic data over time, salary equity studies, and school-wide climate surveys in 2005, 2011, and 2015. Specific outcomes included measures of diversity, salary equity, behavior, and climate. Results Over the ten-year period, the proportion of women increased from 16% to 23% of tenure/tenure-track faculty and 31%–40% of all faculty. Underrepresented minority faculty increased from less than 1%–7% of tenure/tenure-track faculty and from 5% to 8% of all faculty. While women continued to be paid less than men, the adjusted difference dropped from 23% to 12%. Reports of inappropriate behavior by faculty decreased significantly, while satisfaction and knowledge about institutional mentoring and resources improved. Conclusion Multiple interventions including new faculty development programs, changes in policy, and measuring demographics/climate supported diverse faculty recruitment, enhanced a culture of respect and improved faculty morale. Cultural changes in policy, periodic faculty data collection with dissemination, and increased faculty development, improve the climate in academic medicine.

REVIEW URRENT C O PINION Integration of endothelial protease-activated receptor-1 inflammatory signaling by ubiquitin Neil J. Grimsey and JoAnn Trejo Purpose of review The maintenance and integrity of the endothelial barrier is essential for vascular homeostasis. Endothelial barrier dysfunction is mediated by various inflammatory factors, many of which act through G protein- coupled receptors including protease-activated receptors (PARs). PARs are expressed in multiple cell types in the vasculature and mediate cellular responses to thrombin, the key effector protease of the coagulation cascade. Thrombin activation of PAR1 induces endothelial barrier permeability through multiple pathways. Here, we discuss the mechanism by which thrombin activation of PAR1 promotes endothelial barrier breakdown and highlight recent advances that have provided new insight into molecular mechanisms that control endothelial barrier integrity. Recent findings Although the signal transduction pathways induced by thrombin activation of PAR1 in endothelial cells have been extensively studied, the key regulatory mechanisms remain poorly understood. Posttranslational modifications are integral to the regulation of PAR1 signaling and recent studies suggest a novel function for ubiquitination of PAR1 in regulation of endothelial barrier permeability. Summary An understanding of how endothelial barrier permeability is regulated by thrombin activation of PAR1 is important for the discovery of new drug targets that can be manipulated to control endothelial barrier permeability and prevent progression of vascular inflammation. Keywords arrestin, endosome, G protein-coupled receptor, p38 MAP kinase, TAB1, thrombin INTRODUCTION Diseases of the vasculature are the most common causes of morbidity and mortality in the United States. A hallmark of vascular inflammation is the breakdown of endothelial barrier integrity in the microvasculature that results in vascular leakage and tissue edema and is mediated by various factors, many of which act through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) [1,2]. Thrombin, a coagulant pro- tease, is generated during vascular injury and inflammation and elicits cellular responses through G protein-coupled protease-activated receptors (PARs). PARs are expressed in endothelial cells, platelets, smooth muscle cells and other cell types in the vasculature. There are four members of the PAR family including PAR1, PAR2, PAR3 and PAR4. The canonical mechanism of protease-activation for this subset of GPCRs has been established for PAR1. Thrombin binds to and cleaves the N-terminus of PAR1, which unmasks a new N-terminal domain that acts as a tethered ligand. Synthetic peptides www.co-hematology.com that mimic the newly formed N-terminal tethered ligand sequence can activate PAR1 independent of thrombin cleavage. All PAR family members respond directly to thrombin with the exception of PAR2. Although PAR2 is not directly activated by thrombin, the N-terminus of PAR1 formed by thrombin cleavage can bind to an adjacent PAR2 in trans to activate the receptor in endothelial cells [3,4]. PAR1 is the major effector of thrombin signal- ing in most cell types including endothelial cells. However, PAR2, PAR3 and PAR4 are often coex- pressed with PAR1 in endothelial cells and can Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA Correspondence to JoAnn Trejo, Department of Pharmacology, Univer- sity of California, San Diego, Biomedical Sciences Building 3044A, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0636, USA. Tel: +1 858 246 0150; fax: +1 858 822 0041; e-mail: joanntrejo@ucsd.edu Curr Opin Hematol 2016, 23:274–279 DOI:10.1097/MOH.0000000000000232 Volume 23 Number 3 May 2016

Protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR1) is a G protein-coupled receptor that undergoes proteolytic irreversible activation by coagulant and anti-coagulant proteases. Given the irreversible activation of PAR1, signaling by the receptor is tightly regulated through desensitization and intracellular trafficking. PAR1 displays both constitutive and agonist-induced internalization. Constitutive internalization of PAR1 is important for generating an internal pool of naïve receptors that replenish the cell surface and facilitate resensitization, whereas agonist-induced internalization of PAR1 is critical for terminating G protein signaling. We showed that PAR1 constitutive internalization is mediated by the adaptor protein complex-2 (AP-2), whereas AP-2 and epsin control agonist-induced PAR1 internalization. However, the mechanisms that regulate PAR1 recycling are not known. In the present study we screened a siRNA library of 140 different membrane trafficking proteins to identify key regulators of PAR1 intracellular trafficking. In addition to known mediators of PAR1 endocytosis, we identified Rab11B as a critical regulator of PAR1 trafficking. We found that siRNA-mediated depletion of Rab11B and not Rab11A blocks PAR1 recycling, which enhanced receptor lysosomal degradation. Although Rab11A is not required for PAR1 recycling, depletion of Rab11A resulted in intracellular accumulation of PAR1 through disruption of basal lysosomal degradation of the receptor. Moreover, enhanced degradation of PAR1 observed in Rab11B-deficient cells is blocked by depletion of Rab11A and the autophagy related-5 protein, suggesting that PAR1 is shuttled to an autophagic degradation pathway in the absence of Rab11B recycling. Together these findings suggest that Rab11A and Rab11B differentially regulate intracellular trafficking of PAR1 through distinct endosomal sorting mechanisms.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are key regulators of the Hippo pathway, a well-established mediator of tumorigenesis and cancer progression. The Hippo pathway is a promising therapeutic target, yet developing inhibitors for the core pathway components has proven difficult. As critical regulators of the Hippo pathway, GPCRs represent a potential upstream therapeutic target for cancer. However, despite the success and promise of GPCRs as therapeutic targets, there are currently no FDA-approved drugs targeting GPCRs for cancer. Protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR1) is a GPCR that has been shown to activate the Hippo pathway and also promote breast cancer progression. PAR1 is overexpressed in breast cancer patient tissue biopsies and in breast carcinoma cell lines and correlates with increased rates of metastasis and poor prognosis and increased invasion and metastatic potential, respectively. One mechanism that leads to PAR1 aberrant overexpression is defective lysosomal trafficking and degradation of the receptor, leading to persistent signaling. We recently showed that arrestin domain containing protein-3 (ARRDC3), an adaptor protein for E3 ubiquitin ligases, functions as a tumor suppressor by controlling proper PAR1 trafficking and degradation in highly aggressive, triple-negative breast carcinoma cells. The dysregulation of PAR1 trafficking due to loss of ARRDC3 expression leads to persistent signaling and promotes breast cancer invasion. However, the mechanism by which ARRDC3 specifically regulates PAR1-stimulated Hippo signaling to promote breast cancer metastasis remains unknown. Here, we show that ARRDC3 regulates GPCR activation of the Hippo pathway in basal-like breast cancer, where the transcriptional coactivators YAP and TAZ play differential roles in GPCR-mediated signaling and invasive capacity. ARRDC3 re-expression in invasive breast carcinoma cells attenuates PAR1-mediated activation of the Hippo pathway through regulation of TAZ but not YAP activation. Furthermore, siRNA knockdown of TAZ inhibits PAR1-stimulated Hippo signaling and invasion, whereas YAP siRNA knockdown has no effect. Our studies suggest a crucial role for ARRDC3 and TAZ in PAR1-Hippo pathway signaling in breast carcinoma invasion and metastasis. A better understanding of the mechanisms by which the Hippo pathway is regulated by GPCRs may lead to new potential therapeutic targets for the treatment or prevention of metastatic breast cancer. Citation Format: Aleena K.S. Arakaki, Wen-An Pan, Helen Wedegaertner, JoAnn Trejo. The α-arrestin ARRDC3 functions as a metastasis suppressor by regulating GPCR activation of the Hippo pathway [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on the Hippo Pathway: Signaling, Cancer, and Beyond; 2019 May 8-11; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2020;18(8_Suppl):Abstract nr A16.