Search

Background After a traumatic brain injury, disturbances in the attentional processes have a direct negative effect on functional recovery and on return to complex activities. To date, there is no good attention remediation treatment available. The primary objective of this review and pilot study is to provide an overview of the research evidence and to evaluate the feasibility of implementing a tDCS protocol to improve attention disorders in patients with mild complicated to severe subacute TBI, hospitalized in an inpatient rehabilitation facility. Our secondary objective is to extract preliminary data and observational information on participants’ response to treatment. Methods Participants were recruited from a consecutive series of patients admitted to the TBI unit of a subspecialized regional rehabilitation center. They received a 20-min tDCS stimulation 3 times a week for 3 weeks. A neuropsychological evaluation was performed before and after the intervention. We collected participants’ sociodemographic and clinical characteristics as well as information about satisfaction, tolerability, and adverse effects. Results One hundred sixty-four patients were admitted between September 2018 and January 2020. One hundred fifty-eight were excluded, and 6 patients with presumed attentional deficits were enrolled. None completed the protocol as intended. No major side effects occurred. Conclusion Non-invasive brain neurostimulation is promising to enhance attention deficits in patients with TBI. Implementation of a tDCS protocol to fulfill this purpose in an intensive inpatient rehabilitation center has its limitations. We made recommendations to facilitate the implementation of similar projects in the future. Trial registration ISRCTN, ISRCTN55243064. Registered 14 October 2020—retrospectively registered.

Study Design Pilot randomized controlled trial with parallel groups. Introduction Engaging individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) awaiting carpal tunnel decompression surgery in a preoperative rehabilitation program may mitigate pain and sensorimotor impairments, enhance functional abilities before surgery, and improve postoperative outcomes. Purpose of the Study To assess the feasibility and the efficacy of a novel preoperative neuromobilization exercise program (NEP). Methods Thirty individuals with CTS were randomly allocated into a four-week home-based neuromobilization exercise group or a standard care group while awaiting surgery. Outcome measures included feasibility (ie, recruitment, attrition, adherence, satisfaction, and safety) and efficacy metrics (ie, median nerve integrity and neurodynamics, tip pinch grip, pain, and upper limb functional abilities) collected before (ie, at the baseline and about four weeks later) and four weeks after surgery. Results Thirty individuals with CTS were recruited (recruitment rate = 11.8%) and 25 completed the study (attrition rate = 16.7%). Adherence (94%) and satisfaction with the program (eg, enjoy the exercises and likeliness to repeat the NEP (≥4.2/5) were high and no serious adverse event was reported. NEP-related immediate pre- and post-surgery beneficial effects on pain interference were documented (P = .05, η2 = .10), whereas an overall increased neurodynamics (P = .04, η2 = .11) and decreased pain severity (P = .01, η2 = .21) were observed. Discussion Engaging in the proposed NEP has limited beneficial effect as a stand-alone intervention on pre- and post-surgery outcomes for individuals with CTS. Expanding the program’s content and attribute by adding other components including desensitization maneuvers and novel therapies promoting corticospinal plasticity is recommended. Conclusion A preoperative NEP completed by individuals with CTS awaiting surgery is feasible, acceptable, and safe. However, given the limited beneficial effectsof the program, revision of its content and attributes is recommended before proceeding to large-scale trials.

BACKGROUND A growing number of stroke survivors are left with little to no rehabilitation services upon discharge from stroke rehabilitation, although arm deficits may persist or develop from disuse once rehabilitation services have ceased. Virtual reality-based rehabilitation, combined with new technologies such as telerehabilitation, including serious games using virtual reality environments that encourage users to practice functional movements from home with minimal supervision, may have an important role to play in optimizing and maintaining upper-extremity (UE) function. OBJECTIVE The primary objective was to determine the extent to which a one-month intervention using a virtual reality-based serious game is effective in improving upper extremity function compared to an evidence-based home exercise program. A secondary objective was to assess the feasibility of implementing the intervention for chronic stroke rehabilitation in participants’ homes. METHODS Fifty-one chronic stroke participants were randomized to Treatment (n=26; Jintronix system) or Standard care (n=25; standardized GRASP kit home program) groups. Participants were evaluated at baseline (pre), immediately after the intervention (post) and at follow-up (4 weeks). The primary outcome measure was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE). Secondary outcome measures included the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) and an abridged version of the Motor Activity Log (MAL-14). RESULTS No statistically significant differences between groups were found across measures. Overall time effects were found for the FMA-UE (P=.045), specifically between pre-intervention and post-intervention time points for both groups (P=.03). Nine participants in the treatment group reached or surpassed minimally clinically important difference (MCID) in scores for the FMA-UE, 7 of them having baseline low or moderate arm function, as compared to 3 participants for the standard care group. Nine of the 16 participants in the treatment group who used the system for a total of at least 400 minutes in the program reached MCID for the FMA-UE, as compared to none of the 10 participants who used it less than 400 minutes. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that UE training for chronic stroke survivors using virtual rehabilitation in their home may be as effective as a gold-standard home exercise program, and that those who on average used the system more than 20 minutes a day 5 times a week achieved greater improvement in UE function, indicating its relevance to be included as part of ongoing rehabilitation services. CLINICALTRIAL NCT02491203 (www.clinicaltrials.gov) INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR2-10.1016/j.cct.2015.12.006

Study Design This is a cross-sectional clinical measurement. Introduction There are currently no Dupuytren's contracture (DC)–specific, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) that can provide a thorough clinical portrait of the patients' perceptions with regard to the execution of regular activities. Purpose of the Study The purpose of this study was to present the development of the Dupuytren's contracture Impact on Function–Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal (DIF-CHUM), a DC-specific PRO. Methods The development process involved consultation of 45 individuals with DC and 7 health professionals, existing literature, and DC-specific PRO. Results The DIF-CHUM is composed of 2 sections: section 1, Activity and Participation includes 8 items per hand, scored on Difficulty and Change scales; section 2, General Impact includes up to 18 items, scored on Difficulty, Importance, Change and Satisfaction scales. Preliminary evidence suggests that the DIF-CHUM demonstrates good content validity. Discussion The DIF-CHUM is designed to be a patient-centered measure of Activity and Participation and Functional Competence for individuals with DC that will provide hand therapists with a unique perspective of the impact of DC on patients' lives. Conclusion Further validation of the DIF-CHUM, including its scoring, is under way.

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs) are the most common causes of disabilities for older adults. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the effectiveness of multimodal interventions including exercise rehabilitation for older adults with chronic MSKDs.A literature search was conducted up to February 2019 in 5 bibliographical databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared multimodal interventions including exercise rehabilitation with usual medical care or no intervention. Randomized controlled trials were assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Meta-analyses were performed and pooled mean differences (MDs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated.Sixteen RCTs (n = 2322 participants) were included. One RCT was considered at low risk of bias, 8 had some concerns of bias, and 7 had a high risk of bias. Participants suffered from hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA) (n = 12 RCTs), low back pain (LBP) (n = 2 RCTs) and generalized chronic pain (GCP) (n = 2 RCTs). Multimodal interventions were significantly more effective than usual care to decrease pain (visual analog scale, out of 10 points) in the short term, MD: -0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.08 to -0.34, n = 900), and in the long term: MD: -0.52 (95% CI -0.98 to -0.05, n = 575), but these differences are not considered clinically important. In terms of disabilities, multimodal interventions were also significantly more effective than usual care. The SMDs were -0.47 (95% CI -0.61 to -0.34, n = 903) and -0.29 (95% CI -0.46 to -0.13, n = 568) for OA trials in the short and long terms, respectively, and -0.47 (95% CI -0.81 to -0.12, n = 211) for LBP and GCP trials in the short term. The magnitude of these effects may be considered as small to moderate.Multimodal intervention including exercise rehabilitation combined with usual medical care is an efficacious therapeutic option to reduce disabilities in older adults with chronic MSKDs. A significant but not clinically important effect was observed for pain. The most beneficial component of the multimodal interventions in terms of education, exercises, or medication remains to be determined.

Purpose. Health promotion (HP) programs represent a promising avenue to address the prevention or mitigation of adverse effects of childhood cancer. However, we do not know the most effective way to promote healthy behaviours in pediatric oncology or how families experience HP interventions during the very challenging time of going through childhood cancer. The purpose of this study was to analyse the perspectives of families affected by childhood cancer regarding their behaviour when participating in a HP program. Methods. We undertook a cross-sectional qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Individual interviews were conducted with parents and adolescents sampled within a larger study. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Results. Participants reported many barriers to participation including organizational barriers, physical or mental health issues and lack of interest or need. Key facilitators included tailoring of the interventions to individuals’ needs and social support. Most participants reported that the program had a positive impact on their health behaviour practices during cancer treatment and about half mentioned having the intention to modify their health behaviour practices in the long-term. For future implementation, participants suggested adding more educational activities, increasing physical activity sessions and improving the coordination with clinical activities. Conclusion. Participants’ and families’ perspectives allow researchers and clinicians to gain greater insights into how to shape HP programs that will be engaging and effective in promoting healthy behaviours in this population.

BACKGROUND Living labs in the health and well-being domain have become increasingly common over the past decade but vary in available infrastructure, implemented study designs, and outcome measures. The Horizon 2020 Project Virtual Health and Wellbeing Living Lab Infrastructure aims to harmonize living lab procedures and open living lab infrastructures to facilitate and promote research activities in the health and well-being domain in Europe and beyond. This protocol will describe the design of a joint research activity, focusing on the use of innovative technology for both rehabilitation interventions and data collection in a rehabilitation context. OBJECTIVE With this joint research activity, this study primarily aims to gain insight into each living lab’s infrastructure and procedures to harmonize health and well-being living lab procedures and infrastructures in Europe and beyond, particularly in the context of rehabilitation. Secondarily, this study aims to investigate the potential of innovative technologies for rehabilitation through living lab methodologies. METHODS This study has a mixed methods design comprising multiple phases. There are two main phases of data collection: cocreation (phase 1) and small-scale pilot studies (phase 2), which are preceded by a preliminary harmonization of procedures among the different international living labs. An intermediate phase further allows the implementation of minor adjustments to the intervention or protocol depending on the input that was obtained in the cocreation phase. A total of 6 small-scale pilot studies using innovative technologies for intervention or data collection will be performed across 4 countries. The target study sample comprises patients with stroke and older adults with mild cognitive impairment. The third and final phases involve Delphi procedures to reach a consensus on harmonized procedures and protocols. RESULTS Phase 1 data collection will begin in March 2022, and phase 2 data collection will begin in June 2022. Results will include the output of the cocreation sessions, small-scale pilot studies, and advice on harmonizing procedures and protocols for health and well-being living labs focusing on rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS The knowledge gained by the execution of this research will lead to harmonized procedures and protocols in a rehabilitation context for health and well-being living labs in Europe and beyond. In addition to the harmonized procedures and protocols in rehabilitation, we will also be able to provide new insights for improving the implementation of innovative technologies in rehabilitation. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT PRR1-10.2196/34537

Background Exergames are increasingly being used among survivors of stroke with chronic upper extremity (UE) sequelae to continue exercising at home after discharge and maintain activity levels. The use of virtual reality exergames combined with a telerehabilitation app (VirTele) may be an interesting alternative to rehabilitate the UE sequelae in survivors of chronic stroke while allowing for ongoing monitoring with a clinician. Objective This study aimed to determine the feasibility of using VirTele in survivors of chronic stroke at home and explore the impact of VirTele on UE motor function, quantity and quality of use, quality of life, and motivation in survivors of chronic stroke compared with conventional therapy. Methods This study was a 2-arm feasibility clinical trial. Eligible participants were randomly allocated to an experimental group (receiving VirTele for 8 weeks) or a control group (receiving conventional therapy for 8 weeks). Feasibility was measured from the exergame and intervention logs completed by the clinician. Outcome measurements included the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-UE, Motor Activity Log-30, Stroke Impact Scale-16, and Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire-15, which were administered to both groups at four time points: time point 1 (T1; before starting the intervention), time point 2 (after the intervention), time point 3 (1 month after the intervention), and time point 4 (T4; 2 months after the intervention). Results A total of 11 survivors of stroke were randomized and allocated to an experimental or a control group. At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, participants pursued the allocated treatment for 3 months instead of 8 weeks. VirTele intervention dose was captured in terms of time spent on exergames, frequency of use of exergames, total number of successful repetitions, and frequency of videoconference sessions. Technical issues included the loss of passwords, internet issues, updates of the system, and problems with the avatar. Overall, most survivors of stroke found the technology easy to use and useful, except for 9% (1/11) of participants. For the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-UE and Motor Activity Log-30, both groups exhibited an improvement in >50% of the participants, which was maintained over time (from time point 3 to T4). Regarding Stroke Impact Scale-16 scores, the control group reported improvement in activities of daily life (3/5, 60%), hand function (5/5, 100%), and mobility (2/5, 40%), whereas the experimental group reported varied and inconclusive results (from T1 to T4). For the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire-15, 75% (3/4) of the experimental group demonstrated an increase in the autonomous motivation score (from T1 to time point 2), whereas, in the control group, this improvement was observed in only 9% (1/11) of participants. Conclusions The VirTele intervention constitutes another therapeutic alternative, in addition to conventional therapy, to deliver an intense personalized rehabilitation program for survivors of chronic stroke with UE sequelae. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/14629

BACKGROUND Exergames are increasingly being used among survivors of stroke with chronic upper extremity (UE) sequelae to continue exercising at home after discharge and maintain activity levels. The use of virtual reality exergames combined with a telerehabilitation app (VirTele) may be an interesting alternative to rehabilitate the UE sequelae in survivors of chronic stroke while allowing for ongoing monitoring with a clinician. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine the feasibility of using VirTele in survivors of chronic stroke at home and explore the impact of VirTele on UE motor function, quantity and quality of use, quality of life, and motivation in survivors of chronic stroke compared with conventional therapy. METHODS This study was a 2-arm feasibility clinical trial. Eligible participants were randomly allocated to an experimental group (receiving VirTele for 8 weeks) or a control group (receiving conventional therapy for 8 weeks). Feasibility was measured from the exergame and intervention logs completed by the clinician. Outcome measurements included the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-UE, Motor Activity Log-30, Stroke Impact Scale-16, and Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire-15, which were administered to both groups at four time points: time point 1 (T1; before starting the intervention), time point 2 (after the intervention), time point 3 (1 month after the intervention), and time point 4 (T4; 2 months after the intervention). RESULTS A total of 11 survivors of stroke were randomized and allocated to an experimental or a control group. At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, participants pursued the allocated treatment for 3 months instead of 8 weeks. VirTele intervention dose was captured in terms of time spent on exergames, frequency of use of exergames, total number of successful repetitions, and frequency of videoconference sessions. Technical issues included the loss of passwords, internet issues, updates of the system, and problems with the avatar. Overall, most survivors of stroke found the technology easy to use and useful, except for 9% (1/11) of participants. For the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-UE and Motor Activity Log-30, both groups exhibited an improvement in >50% of the participants, which was maintained over time (from time point 3 to T4). Regarding Stroke Impact Scale-16 scores, the control group reported improvement in activities of daily life (3/5, 60%), hand function (5/5, 100%), and mobility (2/5, 40%), whereas the experimental group reported varied and inconclusive results (from T1 to T4). For the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire-15, 75% (3/4) of the experimental group demonstrated an increase in the autonomous motivation score (from T1 to time point 2), whereas, in the control group, this improvement was observed in only 9% (1/11) of participants. CONCLUSIONS The VirTele intervention constitutes another therapeutic alternative, in addition to conventional therapy, to deliver an intense personalized rehabilitation program for survivors of chronic stroke with UE sequelae. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR2-10.2196/14629

BACKGROUND In Canada, chronic stroke survivors have difficulty accessing community-based rehabilitation services, due to lack of resources. VirTele, a personalized remote rehabilitation program combining virtual reality exergames and telerehabilitation, was developed to offer chronic stroke survivors the opportunity to pursue rehabilitation of their affected upper extremity (UE) at home, while receiving ongoing monitoring by a clinician. OBJECTIVE The objectives of this study were to: 1) Explore the determinants of VirTele use among chronic stroke survivors and clinicians; 2) Identify indicators of support of psychological needs by clinicians, during VirTele intervention; and 3) explore indicators of empowerment among stroke survivors. METHODS This multiple case study involved three chronic stroke survivors participating in a VirTele intervention and their respective clinicians (physiotherapists). VirTele is a two-month remote rehabilitation intervention, using non immersive virtual reality exergames and telerehabilitation aimed at improving UE deficits in chronic stroke survivors. Study participants had autonomous access to Jintronix exergames, which they were asked to use 5 times a week for 30 minutes periods. VirTele also included videoconference sessions with a clinician, 1 to 3 times a week (1-hour duration), using the Reacts application. During these sessions, the clinician was able to engage in motivational interviewing, supervise the stroke survivors’ use of the exergames and monitor the use of the affected UE through activities of daily life. Semi-directed interviews were conducted 4 to5 weeks after the end of the VirTele intervention. Two interview guides, adapted for clinicians and stroke survivors respectively, were developed to facilitate the interview administration while allowing new codes to emerge. All interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. RESULTS Three stroke survivors (2 females and 1 male), with a mean age of 58.8 years (SD=19,4), and two physiotherapists participated in the study. Five major determinants of VirTele use emerged from the qualitative analyses, namely the technology performance (usefulness, perception of exergames), effort (ease of use), entourage support (encouragement), facilitators (stroke survivors’ safety, trust and understating of instructions), and challenges (miscommunication, exergames limits). At the end of the VirTele intervention, both clinicians demonstrated support of psychological needs, in terms of autonomy, competence and relatedness, all of which were reflected as empowerment indicators in the three-stroke survivors. Lessons learned from using telerehabilitation combined with exergames were provided, which will be relevant to other researchers and transferable to other populations and contexts. CONCLUSIONS This multiple case study provided a first glimpse at the impact that motivational interviewing can have on adherence to exergames and behavior modification of UE use in stroke survivors. Five major determinants of VirTele use have been identified, namely technology performance, effort, entourage support, facilitators and challenges. Lessons learned from these determinants may serve as a model to guide the implementation of similar interventions. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR2-10.2196/14629

Background In Canada, stroke survivors have difficulty accessing community-based rehabilitation services because of a lack of resources. VirTele, a personalized remote rehabilitation program combining virtual reality exergames and telerehabilitation, was developed to provide stroke survivors an opportunity to pursue rehabilitation of their chronic upper extremity (UE) deficits at home while receiving ongoing follow-up from a clinician. Objective We aimed to identify the behavioral and motivational techniques used by clinicians during the VirTele intervention, explore the indicators of empowerment among stroke survivors, and investigate the determinants of VirTele use among stroke survivors and clinicians. Methods This multiple case study involved 3 stroke survivors with chronic UE deficits and their respective clinicians (physiotherapists) who participated in the VirTele intervention, a 2-month remote rehabilitation intervention that uses nonimmersive virtual reality exergames and telerehabilitation aimed at improving UE deficits in stroke survivors. Study participants had autonomous access to Jintronix exergames and were asked to use them for 30 minutes, 5 times a week. The VirTele intervention included 1-hour videoconference sessions with a clinician 1 to 3 times a week, during which the clinician engaged in motivational interviewing, supervised the stroke survivors’ use of the exergames, and monitored their use of the affected UE through activities of daily living. Semidirected interviews were conducted with the clinicians and stroke survivors 4 to 5 weeks after the end of the VirTele intervention. All interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim. An abductive thematic analysis was conducted to generate new ideas through a dynamic interaction between data and theory. Results Three stroke survivors (n=2, 67%, women and n=1, 33%, man), with a mean age of 58.8 (SD 19.4) years, and 2 physiotherapists participated in the study. Five major determinants of VirTele use emerged from the qualitative analyses, namely technology performance (usefulness and perception of exergames), effort (ease of use), family support (encouragement), facilitators (considerations of the stroke survivors’ safety as well as trust and understanding of instructions), and challenges (miscommunication and exergame limits). During the VirTele intervention, both clinicians used motivational and behavioral techniques to support autonomy, competence, and connectivity. All these attributes were reflected as empowerment indicators in the stroke survivors. Lessons learned from using telerehabilitation combined with exergames are provided, which will be relevant to other researchers and contexts. Conclusions This multiple case study provides a first glimpse into the impact that motivational interviewing can have on adherence to exergames and changes in behavior in the use of the affected UE in stroke survivors. Lessons learned regarding the supportive role caregivers play and the new responsibilities clinicians have when using the VirTele intervention may inform the use of exergames via telerehabilitation. These lessons will also serve as a model to guide the implementation of similar interventions. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/14629

To evaluate the perceived usability and utility of using a soft robotic glove to rehabilitate hand function following a stroke.A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was used to consult a convenience sample of 14 experienced occupational therapists (OTs) practicing within a specialised stroke rehabilitation program. All OTs participated in one 60-to-90-minute individual consultation during which the attributes of a recently-developed soft robotic glove (ExoGlove) were presented before they could test it on themselves. After this consultation, OTs completed the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire and answered open-ended questions focussing on the usability and utility of soft robotic gloves framed according to the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT).The OTs perceived the glove's usability as being moderate-to-good on the SUS (median score= 63.75 on a scale of 100). Thematic analysis revealed the importance of specifically considering elements such as ease of use (e.g. simplicity and speed), cost, movement precision, durability, and safety, when developing soft robotic gloves such as the ExoGlove.Engagement in a continuous improvement process is essential to maximise the perceived usability and utility of soft robotic gloves, particularly of the ExoGlove, through their final development phase before pilot testing their effects and effectiveness for post-stroke hand rehabilitation.Implications for rehabilitationAll occupational therapists anticipate that a soft robotic glove such as the ExoGlove will allow them to increase treatment intensity and best aligns with principles of neuroplasticity.The clinical judgement and guidance of OTs, developed through practice, experience, and knowledge, remain essential to safely and efficiently exercise with a soft robotic glove.Achieving a balance between effort and performance expectancies is essential in developing and improving the functionality of soft robotic gloves, as with each additional functionality comes new challenges that impact its successful transition to a clinical setting.

Objective Assess the utility of the admission Spinal Cord Injury Pressure Ulcer Scale (SCIPUS), Braden Scale, and the FIM for identifying individuals at risk for developing pressure injury during inpatient spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation. Design Retrospective cohort. Setting Two tertiary rehabilitation centers. Participants Individuals (N=754) participating in inpatient SCI rehabilitation. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the utility of the SCIPUS, Braden Scale, and FIM for identifying individuals at risk for developing pressure injury (PI) during inpatient SCI rehabilitation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, false negative rate, odds ratio, likelihood ratio, and area under the curve (AUC) are reported. Results The SCIPUS total score and its individual items did not demonstrate acceptable accuracy (AUC≥0.7) whereas the Braden Scale (0.73) and the FIM score (0.74) did. Once items were dichotomized into high and low risk categories, 1 Braden item (friction and shear), 5 FIM items (bathing, toileting, bed/chair transfer, tub/shower transfer, toilet transfer), the FIM transfers subscale, FIM Motor subscale, and the FIM instrument as a whole, maintained AUCs ≥0.7 and negative predictive values ≥0.95. The FIM bed/chair transfer score demonstrated the highest likelihood ratio (2.62) and overall was the most promising measure for determining PI risk. Conclusion Study findings suggest that a simple measure of mobility, admission FIM bed/chair transfer score of 1 (total assist), can identify at-risk individuals with greater accuracy than both an SCI specific instrument (SCIPUS) and a PI specific instrument (Braden). The FIM bed/chair transfer score can be readily determined at rehabilitation admission with minimal administrative and clinical burden.

As cancer and its treatment negatively impacts the long-term health and quality of life of survivors, there is a need to explore new avenues to prevent or minimize the impact of adverse effects in children with cancer and cancer survivors. Therefore, this scoping review aimed to report on the state of the evidence on the use and effects of complex behavioral interventions (CBI) targeting physical activity and/or dietary behaviors in pediatric oncology. Fourteen quantitative studies were included, evaluating interventions that used a combination of two or three different treatment modalities. Overall, studies demonstrated that it is feasible to implement CBI and that they can potentially improve physical activity and dietary behaviors as well as patient outcomes such as physical and psychological health. Unfortunately, due to a paucity of studies and the heterogeneity of the studies included in this review, no conclusive evidence favoring specific interventions were identified.

BACKGROUND In Canada, only 11% of stroke survivors have access to outpatient and community-based rehabilitation after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Hence, innovative community-based strategies are needed to provide adequate postrehabilitation services. The VirTele program, which combines virtual reality exergames and a telerehabilitation app, was developed to provide stroke survivors with residual upper extremity deficits, the opportunity to participate in a personalized home rehabilitation program. OBJECTIVE This study aims to determine the feasibility of VirTele for remote upper extremity rehabilitation in a chronic stroke survivor; explore the preliminary efficacy of VirTele on upper extremity motor function, the amount and quality of upper extremity use, and impact on quality of life and motivation; and explore the determinants of behavioral intention and use behavior of VirTele along with indicators of empowerment. METHODS A 63-year-old male stroke survivor (3 years) with moderate upper extremity impairment participated in a 2-month VirTele intervention. He was instructed to use exergames (5 games for upper extremity) for 30 minutes, 5 times per week, and conduct videoconference sessions with a clinician at least once per week. Motivational interviewing was incorporated into VirTele to empower the participant to continue exercising and use his upper extremities in everyday activities. Upper extremity motor function (Fugl-Meyer Assessment–upper extremity), amount and quality of upper extremity use (Motor Activity Log-30), and impact on quality of life (Stroke Impact Scale-16) and motivation (Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire-15) were measured before (T1), after (T2) VirTele intervention, and during a 1- (T3) and 2-month (T4) follow-up period. Qualitative data were collected through logs and semistructured interviews. Feasibility data (eg, number and duration of videoconference sessions and adherence) were documented at the end of each week. RESULTS The participant completed 48 exergame sessions (33 hours) and 8 videoconference sessions. Results suggest that the VirTele intervention and the study protocol could be feasible for stroke survivors. The participant exhibited clinically meaningful improvements at T2 on the Fugl-Meyer and Stroke Impact Scale-16 and maintained these gains at T3 and T4. During the follow-up periods, the amount and quality of upper extremity use showed meaningful changes, suggesting more involvement of the affected upper extremity in daily activities. The participant demonstrated a high level of autonomous motivation, which may explain his adherence. Performance, effort, and social influence have meaningful weights in the behavioral intention of using VirTele. However, the lack of control of technical and organizational infrastructures may influence the long-term use of technology. At the end of the intervention, the participant demonstrated considerable empowerment at both the behavioral and capacity levels. CONCLUSIONS VirTele was shown to be feasible for use in chronic stroke survivors for remote upper extremity rehabilitation. Meaningful determinants of behavioral intention and use behavior of VirTele were identified, and preliminary efficacy results are promising. CLINICALTRIAL INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR2-10.2196/14629

Background In Canada, only 11% of stroke survivors have access to outpatient and community-based rehabilitation after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Hence, innovative community-based strategies are needed to provide adequate postrehabilitation services. The VirTele program, which combines virtual reality exergames and a telerehabilitation app, was developed to provide stroke survivors with residual upper extremity deficits, the opportunity to participate in a personalized home rehabilitation program. Objective This study aims to determine the feasibility of VirTele for remote upper extremity rehabilitation in a chronic stroke survivor; explore the preliminary efficacy of VirTele on upper extremity motor function, the amount and quality of upper extremity use, and impact on quality of life and motivation; and explore the determinants of behavioral intention and use behavior of VirTele along with indicators of empowerment. Methods A 63-year-old male stroke survivor (3 years) with moderate upper extremity impairment participated in a 2-month VirTele intervention. He was instructed to use exergames (5 games for upper extremity) for 30 minutes, 5 times per week, and conduct videoconference sessions with a clinician at least once per week. Motivational interviewing was incorporated into VirTele to empower the participant to continue exercising and use his upper extremities in everyday activities. Upper extremity motor function (Fugl-Meyer Assessment–upper extremity), amount and quality of upper extremity use (Motor Activity Log-30), and impact on quality of life (Stroke Impact Scale-16) and motivation (Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire-15) were measured before (T1), after (T2) VirTele intervention, and during a 1- (T3) and 2-month (T4) follow-up period. Qualitative data were collected through logs and semistructured interviews. Feasibility data (eg, number and duration of videoconference sessions and adherence) were documented at the end of each week. Results The participant completed 48 exergame sessions (33 hours) and 8 videoconference sessions. Results suggest that the VirTele intervention and the study protocol could be feasible for stroke survivors. The participant exhibited clinically meaningful improvements at T2 on the Fugl-Meyer and Stroke Impact Scale-16 and maintained these gains at T3 and T4. During the follow-up periods, the amount and quality of upper extremity use showed meaningful changes, suggesting more involvement of the affected upper extremity in daily activities. The participant demonstrated a high level of autonomous motivation, which may explain his adherence. Performance, effort, and social influence have meaningful weights in the behavioral intention of using VirTele. However, the lack of control of technical and organizational infrastructures may influence the long-term use of technology. At the end of the intervention, the participant demonstrated considerable empowerment at both the behavioral and capacity levels. Conclusions VirTele was shown to be feasible for use in chronic stroke survivors for remote upper extremity rehabilitation. Meaningful determinants of behavioral intention and use behavior of VirTele were identified, and preliminary efficacy results are promising. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/14629

Impairments of the upper limb (UL) are common after a stroke and may affect bilateral coordination. A better understanding of UL bilateral coordination is required for designing innovative rehabilitation strategies.To assess bilateral coordination after stroke using time-distance, velocity and force parameters during an UL bilateral task performed by simultaneously pushing handles on a bilateral exerciser at two levels of force.Two groups were included to assess bilateral coordination on a newly designed bimanual exerciser- One group of individuals at least 3 months post-stroke (n = 19) with moderate impairment and one group of healthy individuals (n = 20). Participants performed linear movements by pushing simultaneously with both hands on instrumented handles. The task consisted of two one-minute trials performed in sitting at two levels of participants' maximum force (MF): 30% and 15%, with visual feedback. Time-distance parameters, spatial, velocity and force profiles were compared between groups, between levels of resistance and the first part (0-50%) and entire duration of the pushing cycles (0-100%).The mean pushing time was longer at 30% MF compared to 15% MF in the stroke group. Spatial profiles, represented by hand positions on the rail, revealed that the paretic hand lagged slightly behind throughout the cycle. For velocity, both groups displayed good coordination. It was less coupled at 30% than 15% MF and a trend was observed toward more lag occurrence in the stroke group. Except for lower forces on the paretic side in the stroke group, the shape of the force profiles was similar between groups, sides and levels of resistance. For all parameters, the coordination was good up to 75% of the pushing cycle and decreased toward the end of the cycle.Individuals after stroke presented with overall spatial and temporal coupling of the UL during bilateral pushing movements. The relay of information at different levels of the nervous system might explain the coordinated pushing movements and might be interesting for training UL coordination.

(1) Background: Increasing the amount of therapy time has been shown to improve motor function in stroke survivors. However, it is often not possible to increase the amount of therapy time provided in the current one-on-one therapy models. Rehabilitation-based virtual reality exergame systems, such as Jintronix, can be offered to stroke survivors as an adjunct to traditional therapy. The goal of this study was to examine the safety and feasibility of providing additional therapy using an exergame system and assess its preliminary clinical efficacy. (2) Methods: Stroke survivors receiving outpatient rehabilitation services participated in this pilot randomized control trial in which the intervention group received 4 weeks of exergaming sessions in addition to traditional therapy sessions. (3) Results: Nine subjects in the intervention and nine subjects in the control group completed the study. The intervention group had at least two extra sessions per week, with an average duration of 44 min per session and no serious adverse events (falls, dizziness, or pain). The efficacy measures showed statistically meaningful improvements in the activities of daily living measures (i.e., MAL-QOM (motor activity log-quality of movement) and both mobility and physical domains of the SIS (stroke impact scale) with mean difference of 1.0%, 5.5%, and 6.7% between the intervention and control group, respectively) at post-intervention. (4) Conclusion: Using virtual reality exergaming technology as an adjunct to traditional therapy is feasible and safe in post-stroke rehabilitation and may be beneficial to upper extremity functional recovery.

Musculoskeletal disorders are associated with altered sensory, proprioceptive and cognitive processes. Sensory processes affect the internal cortical representation of the body in space, the body schema, which in turn influences motor control. The purpose of this study was to determine if participants with wrist/hand disorders had impaired performance on a task associated with the body schema, the Left/Right Judgement Task (LRJT) and secondly how LRJT performance, motor performance, disability, pain and related aspects are associated.Fifteen healthy control participants and 15 participants with hand/wrist pain were asked to determine the laterality of images of hands. Measures of motor performance (Purdue Pegboard test), self-reported disability (Australian Canadian Hand Index), and pain related aspects (pain intensity, symptom duration, pain interference and affective distress) were recorded.Participants with wrist/hand pain scored lower on all segments of the Purdue Pegboard test. There were differences in LRJT performance between groups for both Accuracy (p = 0.03) and Reaction Time (RT) (p 0.01). There was no correlation between RT and Accuracy with pain intensity, pain duration, and disability. Both motor performance (r = 0.58-0.64) and LRJT performance Accuracy (r = 0.59) and RT (r = -0.56) were correlated with affective distress. A significant correlation was observed between RT and motor performance in healthy control participants (r = -0.56, p = 0.03) but not in participants with wrist/hand pain (r = -0.26, p = 0.44).LRJT and motor performance was correlated with affective distress in participants with wrist/hand pain suggestive of complex interactions between cognitive-affective processes and sensorimotor integration.

There is a growing body of evidence that chronic musculoskeletal injuries are associated with neurophysiological changes in distributed areas of the central nervous system. Traditionally a biomedical model based upon the belief that structural injury to anatomical structures was the sole driver of the condition has guided interventions. In osteopathy, the concept of somatic dysfunction has been the predominant model guiding clinical practice where areas of dysfunction are believed to result from mechanical restrictions that impact normal physiological function. However, despite these models, chronic musculoskeletal disorders such as chronic low back pain remain a challenge for osteopaths and other health care providers. The present article reviews the neurophysiological changes associated with chronic musculoskeletal disorders specifically in the sensorimotor and cognitive-affective-motivational areas of the brain. These neurophysiological changes appear to be part of the pathophysiological process, and are consistent with many of the clinical findings associated with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. Recommendations, inspired by evidence of neurophysiological effects of manual therapy, pain science, and principles driving neuroplastic changes deriving from human and animal studies, are made for osteopathic treatment of chronic musculoskeletal disorders to address these neurophysiological changes. Patient-osteopath interactions may help reconceptualise beliefs and cognitions, may alter behavioural responses, and engage forebrain structures tapping into self-regulatory and homeostatic processes. Neurophysiological effects of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment may also help renormalize properties and organisation in cortical sensorimotor areas and impact the autonomic nervous system.

Background Recovery of handgrip is critical after stroke since it is positively related to upper limb function. To boost motor recovery, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising, non-invasive brain stimulation technique for the rehabilitation of persons with stroke. When applied over the primary motor cortex (M1), tDCS has been shown to modulate neural processes involved in motor learning. However, no studies have looked at the impact of tDCS on the learning of a grip task in both stroke and healthy individuals. Objective To assess the use of tDCS over multiple days to promote motor learning of a grip task using a learning paradigm involving a speed-accuracy tradeoff in healthy individuals. Methods In a double-blinded experiment, 30 right-handed subjects (mean age: 22.1 ± 3.3 years) participated in the study and were randomly assigned to an anodal ( n = 15) or sham ( n = 15) stimulation group. First, subjects performed the grip task with their dominant hand while following the pace of a metronome. Afterwards, subjects trained on the task, at their own pace, over 5 consecutive days while receiving sham or anodal tDCS over M1. After training, subjects performed de novo the metronome-assisted task. The change in performance between the pre and post metronome-assisted task was used to assess the impact of the grip task and tDCS on learning. Results Anodal tDCS over M1 had a significant effect on the speed-accuracy tradeoff function. The anodal tDCS group showed significantly greater improvement in performance (39.28 ± 15.92%) than the sham tDCS group (24.06 ± 16.35%) on the metronome-assisted task, t (28) = 2.583, P = 0.015 (effect size d = 0.94). Conclusions Anodal tDCS is effective in promoting grip motor learning in healthy individuals. Further studies are warranted to test its potential use for the rehabilitation of fine motor skills in stroke patients.

Background and objectives: The language-induced grip force modulation (GFM) can be used to better understand the link between the language and motor functions as an expression of the embodied language. However, the contribution of each brain hemisphere to the language-induced GFM is still unclear. Using six different action verbs as stimuli, this study evaluated the GFM of the left hand in unimanual task to characterize the left- and right-hemisphere contributions. Materials and Methods: The left-hand GFM of 20 healthy consistent right-handers subjects was evaluated using the verbs “to write”, “to hold”, “to pull”(left-lateralized central processing actions), “to draw”, “to tie”, and “to drive” (bi-hemispheric central processing actions) as linguistic stimuli. The time between the word onset and the first interval of statistical significance regarding the baseline (RT) was also measured. Results: The six verbs produced language-induced GFM. The modulation intensity was similar for the six verbs, but the RT was variable. The verbs “to draw”, “to tie”, and “to drive”, whose central processing of the described action is bihemispheric showed a longer Rt compared to the other verbs. Conclusions: The possibility that an action is performed by the left-hand does not interfere with the occurrence of GFM when this action verb is employed as linguistic stimulus. Therefore, the language-induced GFM seems mainly rely on the left hemisphere, and the engagement of the right hemisphere seems to slow down the increase in the GFM intensity.

Access to remote rehabilitation services is now possible thanks to advanced technology solutions such as exergames and telerehabilitation-applications. This pretest/posttest single case study, conducted with one participant with a chronic stroke (3 years) aimed at collecting preliminary evidence regarding feasibility and efficacy of using a telerehabilitation application combined with an exergame on upper limb function, motivation and quality of life after stroke. Forty-two exergame training sessions (including 8 videoconferencing sessions) took place over a two-month period. The results showed significant improvement of upper limb motor function and an increase of the affected upper limb amount of use in activities of daily life. However, no significant change was recorded regarding the impact on quality of life and motivation. These preliminary results allow us to have a first glimpse of the potential of this program and better inform a larger scale study.

Background: The mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (mini-BESTest) is a valid tool for assessing standing balance in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Its reliability has not yet been investigated with this population. Objective: To assess the test-retest and inter-rater reliability of the mini-BESTest in adults with SCI in a rehabilitation setting. Methods: Twenty-three participants admitted in a rehabilitation center following an SCI (mean age = 52.2 years, SD = 14.5; 13/23 tetraplegia; 14/23 traumatic injury) and able to stand 30 seconds without help were recruited. They were evaluated twice with the mini-BESTest to establish the test-retest reliability (interval of 1 to 2 days). One of the two sessions was video-recorded to establish the inter-rater reliability (3 physiotherapists). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,1), weighted kappa (Kw) and Kendall's W were used to determine reliability of total score and individual items. Minimal detectable changes (MDC) were computed. Results. The mini-BESTest total scores showed excellent test-retest (ICC = 0.94) and inter-rater (ICC = 0.96) reliability. Reliability of 50% of the individual items was acceptable to excellent (Κw and W = 0.35-1.00). The MDC of the mini-BESTest total score was 4 points. Conclusion: The mini-BESTest is a reliable tool to assess standing balance in adults with an SCI. A minimal change of 4 points on the total scale is needed to be confident that the change is not a measurement error between two sessions or two raters.

BACKGROUND Exergames have the potential to provide an accessible, remote approach for poststroke upper extremity (UE) rehabilitation. However, the use of exergames without any follow-up by a health professional could lead to compensatory movements during the exercises, inadequate choice of difficulty level, exercises not being completed, and lack of motivation to pursue exercise programs, thereby decreasing their benefits. Combining telerehabilitation with exergames could allow continuous adjustment of the exercises and monitoring of the participant’s completion and adherence. At present, there is limited evidence regarding the feasibility or efficacy of combining telerehabilitation and exergames for stroke rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE This study aims to (1) determine the preliminary efficacy of using telerehabilitation combined with exergames on UE motor recovery, function, quality of life, and motivation in participants with chronic stroke, compared with conventional therapy (the graded repetitive arm supplementary program; GRASP); (2) examine the feasibility of using the technology with participants diagnosed with stroke at home; and (3) identify the obstacles and facilitators for its use by participants diagnosed with stroke and stroke therapists and understand the shared decision-making process. METHODS A mixed methods study protocol is proposed, including a randomized, blinded feasibility trial with an embedded multiple case study. The intervention consists of the provision of a remote rehabilitation program, during which participants will use the Jintronix exergame for UE training and the Reacts Application to conduct videoconferenced sessions with the therapists (physical or occupational therapists). We plan to recruit 52 participants diagnosed with stroke, randomly assigned to a control group (n=26; 2-month on-paper home exercise program: the GRASP with no supervision) and an experimental group (n=26; 2-month home program using the technology). The primary outcome is the Fugl-Meyer UE Assessment, a performance-based measure of UE impairment. The secondary outcomes are self-reported questionnaires and include the Motor Activity Log-28 (quality and frequency of use of the UE), Stroke Impact Scale-16 (the quality of life), and Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (motivation). Feasibility data include process, resources, management, and scientific outcomes. Qualitative data will be collected by interviews with both participants and therapists. RESULTS At present, data collection was ongoing with one participant who had completed the exergame- telerehabilitation based intervention. We expect to collect preliminary efficacy data of this technology on the functional and motor recovery of the UE, following a stroke; collect feasibility data with users at home (adherence, safety, and technical difficulties); and identify the obstacles and facilitators for the technology use and understand the shared decision-making process. CONCLUSIONS This paper describes the protocol underlying the study of a telerehabilitation-exergame technology to contribute to understanding its feasibility and preliminary efficacy for UE stroke rehabilitation. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03759106; http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03759106. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT DERR1-10.2196/14629

Background Sensory and motor disturbances are characteristic of musculoskeletal injuries and conditions. Rehabilitation interventions aimed at remediating these disturbances are traditionally exclusively targeted to the affected area. However, there is some evidence of bilateral changes in sensory and motor function associated with unilateral injuries and conditions suggesting central changes. Deficits on specific cognitive tasks have also been documented in persons with chronic pain. Purpose The purpose of the present study was to determine if participants with unilateral pain arising from heterogeneous wrist/hand injuries and conditions demonstrate bilateral changes in sensory and motor functions as well as cognitive deficits. Design/methods Sensory (Pressure Pain Thresholds, Two Point Orientation Discrimination), Motor (grip strength and Purdue Pegboard), and Cognitive function (Stroop test and mental rotation task) were measured in 30 participants with wrist/hand pain and 30 healthy control participants in an observational cross-sectional study. Results Participants with unilateral wrist/hand pain demonstrated differences in cognitive function measured with the Stroop test (p = 0.03). They also demonstrated bilateral sensorimotor differences in pressure pain thresholds (p = 0.03), grip strength (p = 0.00) and Purdue pegboard test (p = 0.03) results compared to healthy control participants. Conclusion Cognitive as well as bilateral alterations in sensory and motor function in participants with musculoskeletal injuries and conditions suggest central changes are involved in their pathophysiology. These findings in persons with heterogeneous injuries/conditions suggest that these changes are not specific to an injury/condition. Bilateral sensorimotor changes have important implications with regards to the pathophysiology of musculoskeletal disorders of the wrist/hand, for rehabilitative interventions and research.

Objective Neuromobilization exercises are increasingly advocated in the conservative management of individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), as they may mitigate CTS-related signs and symptoms via potential peripheral (ie, musculoskeletal) and central (ie, neurophysiological) adaptations. However, the mechanisms underlying these adaptations have not been studied extensively. Hence, this exploratory and mechanistic study aims to evaluate the potential peripheral and central adaptations that may result in individuals with CTS who have completed a neuromobilization program. Methods Fourteen individuals with CTS were evaluated before and 1 week after the completion of a 4-week neuromobilization program that incorporated median nerve sliding exercises. Pain and upper limb functional abilities were assessed using standardized questionnaires. The biological integrity and mechanical properties of the median nerve and the corticospinal excitability were quantified using musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation, respectively. Results Upon completion of the program, participants reported both large and moderate improvements in pain (P ≤ .03) and upper limb functional abilities (P = .02), respectively. The biological integrity and mechanical properties of the median nerve remained unchanged (P ≥ .22), whereas a small significant increase in corticospinal excitability (P = .04) was observed. Conclusion The proposed neuromobilization program appears promising to improve pain and upper limb functional abilities in individuals with CTS. These improvements may be preferentially mediated via central, rather than peripheral, adaptations. Future studies, especially with a larger sample size, longer intervention duration, and additional measurement times, are needed to strengthen current evidence.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of left intraparietal sulcus (IPS) inhibition by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on grip force modulation (GFM) for both hands during a unimanual task. Methods: GFM induced by manual action-verb listening was evaluated for each hand in a unimanual task, and the motor-evoked potentials (MEP) were recorded for both left and right hemispheres prior to and following the left IPS inhibition. Left IPS inhibition was obtained by rTMS (5 min of 1.0 Hz, 60% of maximal stimulator output) of the international 10–20 system P3 point. Seven healthy right-handed subjects were evaluated. Results: One-way repeated measures ANOVA found that MEP amplitude and duration increased following IPS inhibition in the left hemisphere and did not change in the right hemisphere. Language-induced modulation did not change in the left hemisphere, while it was significantly attenuated in the right hemisphere. Since IPS inhibition increased the left primary motor cortex (M1) excitability, the maintenance of language-induced modulation intensity suggests it was also attenuated. Conclusion: Left IPS inhibition increased left M1 excitability without changing right M1 excitability, while attenuating the language-induced GFM for both the left and right hands.

Study design Secondary analysis of retrospective data. Objective The aim of this study was to further validate the Spinal Cord Injury Pressure Ulcer Scale (SCIPUS) using Rasch analysis. Setting Two rehabilitation centers in Canada. Method Data were collected as part of the Spinal Cord Injury Knowledge Mobilization Network (SCI KMN) initiative. The SCIPUS was completed within 72 h of inpatient admission. Persons admitted for initial rehabilitation in two inpatient spinal cord rehabilitation programs were included in the project. Results Data from 886 participants were analyzed, approximately 60% of whom were males. Rasch analyses demonstrated that the SCIPUS, in its current format did not meet criteria required for true measurement. A transformed version of the SCIPUS obtained by deletion of misfitting items and modification of the response scales improved fit to the model and showed preliminary evidence of unidimensionality. The person separation index, however indicated that the scale requires further adjustments of its scoring options. Conclusions In its original form, the SCIPUS does not meet the requirements of the Rasch model and its total score should be used cautiously. However, following some adjustments to the items such as addressing DIF between sites to insure a standardized assessment across sites and adding response options to some of the items, interval-scale measurement should be possible.

Patient advisors for victims of traumatic amputation: a critical intervention. Since 2014, the Centre of Expertise in Reimplantation and Microsurgical Revascularization at the University of Montreal (CEVARMU) has been recruiting on an ad hoc basis former patients, who have completed the rehabilitation process, to accompany and support new patients at the Centre during their care process. Considered full-fledged partners of the care team, these patient advisors are invited to meet with patients who are hospitalized or in the rehabilitation process to not only share their experience but also ensure that the treatment plans proposed to the patients are well understood and meet their needs. Around forty interventions have been conducted by five patient advisors, helping to strengthen the credibility of professional interventions, break down patients' isolation, and give new meaning to the work of health professionals.Le patient-ressource chez les victimes d’amputation traumatique. Depuis 2014, le Centre d’expertise en réimplantation ou revascularisation microchirurgicale d’urgence (CEVARMU) fait appel, sur une base ponctuelle, à d’anciens patients ayant terminé leur processus de réadaptation afin d’accompagner et de soutenir les patients nouvellement arrivés au centre dans leur propre processus de soins. Considérés comme des partenaires à part entière de l’équipe, ces patients-ressources sont invités à venir rencontrer, sur une base bénévole, les patients hospitalisés ou qui sont en processus de réadaptation afin de témoigner de leur expérience mais aussi de s’assurer que les plans de traitement proposés aux patients soient bien compris par ces derniers et qu’ils répondent à leurs besoins. Une quarantaine d’interventions ont été réalisées par cinq patientsressources et ont permis de renforcer la crédibilité des interventions des professionnels, de briser l’isolement des patients et de redonner du sens au travail des professionnels.