Search

Several therapies directed at novel targets and also immunotherapies have recently shown promising results in advanced or metastatic TNBC. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these new regimens for advanced or metastatic TNBC (mTNBC).The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched for phase III randomized trials. We conducted a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of new targeted and immunotherapy regimens. Trial quality was assessed using the GRADE method. The comparative outcomes were progression-free survival, overall survival, and G3-4 adverse drug events (ADEs).Thirteen phase III randomized controlled trials were identified in the network meta-analysis. Olaparib significantly improved PFS in comparison with the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy 1, atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and pembrolizumab regimens. Sacituzumab yielded a significant improvement in OS over immunotherapies, veliparib, and chemotherapy alone, but no significantly superiority over pembrolizumab, olaparib, and talazoparib. The risk of ≥grade 3 ADEs associated with olaparib was significantly lower than the risks associated with the other regimens.For mTNBC, sacituzumab had a better effect on overall survival, with comparatively high risk of SAE, whereas olaparib improved progression-free survival with a lower risk of SAE, particularly in those patients with BRCA mutations.

Objectives: To evaluate the cost–effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Methods: A Markov model was constructed to simulate the clinical outcomes and costs of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Clinical outcomes data were derived from randomized clinical trials. Drug acquisition cost and other health resource use were obtained from the claim data of a tertiary hospital and the National Health Insurance. The outcome was an incremental cost–effectiveness ratio expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life year gained. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the uncertainty of the model parameters. Results: In the base case, patients treated with immunotherapies in the second line were associated with higher costs and higher mean survival. The incremental costs per quality-adjusted life year gained for pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or atezolizumab compared to docetaxel were NT$416,102, NT$1,572,912 and NT$1,580,469, respectively. Conclusion: The results showed that pembrolizumab was more cost effective than nivolumab and atezolizumab compared with docetaxel as a second-line regimen for patients with previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer at willingness to pay threshold in Taiwan.

This study aimed to estimate the cost-utility of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plus cetuximab for patients with previously irradiated recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.We constructed a Markov health-state transition model to simulate costs and clinical outcomes of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Model parameters were derived from the published literature and the National Health Insurance Administration reimbursement price list. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and the net monetary benefit were calculated from a health payer perspective. The impact of uncertainty was modeled with one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.In the base-case, SBRT plus cetuximab compared to SBRT alone resulted in an ICER of NT$ 840,455 per QALY gained. In the one-way sensitivity analysis, the utility of progression-free state for patients treated with SBRT plus cetuximab or SBRT alone and the cost of progression-free survival for SBRT+Cet were the most sensitive parameters in the model. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the probability of cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay threshold of NT$ 2,252,340 per QALY was 100% for SBRT plus cetuximab but 0% for SBRT alone.This study showed that SBRT+Cet was cost-effective and benefited patients with previously irradiated rSCCHN.

Cervical cancer is ranked top ten in the ranking of female cancer and the metastasis of cervical cancer is one of the main causes of decreasing five-year-survival rates. Neuroendocrine cervical cancer belongs to rare type of cervical cancer and is one of the more malignant cancer type, compared to squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. In the previous work, we have carried out proteomics-based 2D-DIGE and MALDI-TOF-MS to analyze the differentially modulated proteins in neuroendocrine cells (HM-1) and other types of cervical cancer cells (Caski, ME-180, HeLa). In which, galectin-1 (LGALS1) was selected as the candidate protein due to high expression of LGALS1 in HM-1 cells. In this study, use small interfering RNA (siRNA) to knockdown LGALS1 expression in HM-1and HM-2 which isolated from human tissue. The migration ability and proliferation ability of neuroendocrine cervical cancer cells are effectively inhibited. Also, the de-regulation of cell cycle progression was observed during LGALS1 silencing. As a result, LGALS1 affects the migration and proliferation ability in neuroendocrine cervical cancer. The protein is potential to be a candidate to detect and treatment of neuroendocrine cervical cancer.

The rising cost of cancer drug therapy threatens the long-term sustainability of Taiwan National Health Insurance. Cost savings can be achieved through various strategies, e.g., using smaller vial sizes, sharing vials, weight-based dosing, or switching to biosimilars. Here we aimed to examine the cost-effectiveness of a trastuzumab biosimilar combined with docetaxel (TDbiol) for treatment-naïve HER2A Markov model with three health states was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab biosimilars plus docetaxel over a 40-month time horizon in patients with HER2In the base-case scenario, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was NTD 811,050 per QALY gained. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the model was sensitive to utilities and transition probabilities, but not particularly sensitive to the wastage assumption. In scenario analyses, the ICER was higher when applying the price for trastuzumab reference biologic (branded), than for trastuzumab biosimilar.The trastuzumab biosimilar combination regimen is cost-effective and offers significant drug cost savings in Taiwan.

Objective : We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of olaparib and niraparib as maintenance therapy for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Methods : A decision analysis model compared the costs and effectiveness of olaparib and niraparib versus placebo for patients with or without germline BRCA mutations. Resource use and associated costs were estimated from the 2020 National Health Insurance Administration reimbursement price list. Clinical effectiveness was measured in progression-free survival per life-years (PFS-LY) based on the results of clinical trials SOLO2/ENHOT-Ov21 and ENGOT-OV16/NOVA. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated from a single-payer perspective. Results : In the base case, olaparib was the more cost-effective treatment regimen. The ICERs for olaparib and niraparib compared to placebo were NT$1,804,785 and NT$2,340,265 per PFS-LY, respectively. Tornado analysis showed that PFS and the total resource use cost of niraparib regimen for patients without gBRCA were the most sensitive parameters impacting the ICER. The ICERs for both drugs in patients with a gBRCA mutation were lower than in patients without a gBRCA mutation. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that olaparib was more cost-effective than niraparib at the willingness-to-pay threshold of NT$2,602,404 per PFS life-year gained. Conclusion : Olaparib was estimated to be less costly. Therefore, olaparib was considered to be a cost-effective maintenance therapy for patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer from the Taiwan NHIA perspective.

We compared the efficacy and safety of combinations of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors and PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors as second-line treatment in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2− metastatic breast cancer. We searched the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library electronic databases for phase II/III randomized trials evaluating CDK4/6 and PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors plus fulvestrant. We compared the results with a network meta-analysis. Study quality was assessed following the GRADE approach. Outcomes of interest were progression-free survival, overall response rate, overall survival and G3–4 adverse drug events (ADEs). Eight RCTs were identified in the network meta-analysis. PFS was significantly improved by treatment with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant and ribociclib plus fulvestrant compared to pictilisib plus fulvestrant. The ORR following treatment with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant, ribociclib plus fulvestrant, palbociclib plus fulvestrant, buparlisib plus fulvestrant, and alpelisib plus fulvestrant significantly differed from that observed following treatment with placebo plus fulvestrant. In terms of OS, compared with placebo plus fulvestrant, abemaciclib plus fulvestrant, ribociclib plus fulvestrant, and buparlisib plus fulvestrant had a significant difference. The risks of ADEs were similar among three CDK4/6 inhibitors. As second-line treatment, three CDK4/6 inhibitors showed superior clinical efficacy compared to other PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors with comparable safety profiles.

We give thanks for your interest in and comments made on our published study in 2017 [1] by the Letter to the editor. Some of the points raised by them are interesting, but we are compelled to poin...

Using network meta-analysis, we assessed the efficacy and safety of a combination regimen of HER2-targeted agents as first-line treatment for metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer.We searched the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library electronic databases (through December 2016) for phase II/III randomized controlled trials that compared regimens of one or two HER2-targeted agents combined with trastuzumab or chemotherapy. A network meta-analysis including direct and indirect analyses was conducted in WinBUGS using fixed and random effects. Study quality was assessed following the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations method. The primary outcome was overall survival.The network meta-analysis incorporated nine HER2-targeted regimens with 9 direct comparisons and 28 indirect comparisons for the main outcomes (8 studies; n = 3976). Combining direct and indirect effects showed significant increased efficacy of trastuzumab and docetaxel plus pertuzumab (TDP) over other regimens as first-line treatment. With indirect comparison of overall safety, TDP, TDM-1, and TDM-1 plus pertuzumab demonstrated a lower risk of grade 3-4 adverse events compared to other regimens.TDPs are a preferred first-line treatment for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer compared with other target agent regimens.

To provide perspective for the National Health Insurance Bureau (NHIB), we determined the cost-effectiveness of pertuzumab combined with trastuzumab and docetaxel (TDP) versus trastuzumab and docetaxel (TD) as a first-line treatment for HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer.We used a Markov model to simulate cost-effectiveness, disease progression, and survival, based on clinical data and transition probabilities extracted from the CLEOPATRA study. Direct medical costs were acquired from the NHIB claims database.The utilities in health state were based on a recent cost-effectiveness study on trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs in New Taiwan dollars (NT$), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). We performed one-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of specific parameters on the model.Modeled median survival was 39.1 months for TD and 50.1 months for TDP. The ICER was NT$18,999,687 (US$593,741) per QALY gained. The sensitivity analyses indicated that TDP could be cost-effective under favorable assumptions; TDP had a 68% chance of being cost-effective, if TDP costs could be reduced with 10% in the stable disease state.Our model predicted that TDP would be cost-effective as a first-line treatment for HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer, but only under favorable drug cost assumptions.

To investigate whether the use of statins is associated with common cancer risk.A population-based case-control study was conducted in Taiwan. Cases were defined as all patients who were aged 18 years and older and had received at least two statin prescriptions for use continuously for at least 6 months before a first-time diagnosis of studied cancers between the period of 2000 and 2008. The controls were matched to cases by age, sex, and index date. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by using the Cox proportional hazards model.A total of 6841 cases and 27,364 matched controls were analyzed. The adjusted hazard ratio for any statin use and cancer at any site were 0.76 (95% 0.654, 0.891). There were a significant reduced risk of gastric cancer (HR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.107, 0.588), liver cancer (HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.279, 0.723) and uterine cancer (HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.279, 0.723) associated with any statins.Overall, the statins suggested a significant reduced risk of the most common cancers in a large Chinese population, particularly in gastric, liver, and uterine cancers.