Search

BackgroundThe benefit of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and efficacy of different first-line MT techniques remain unclear for distal and medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs). In this systematic review, we aimed to compare the performance of three first-line MT techniques in DMVOs.MethodsThe PubMed database was searched for studies examining the utility of MT in DMVOs (middle cerebral artery M2-3-4, anterior cerebral artery, and posterior cerebral artery). Studies providing data for aspiration thrombectomy (ASP), stent retriever thrombectomy (SR), and combined SR+ASP technique were included. Non-comparative studies were excluded. Safety and efficacy data were collected for each technique. The Nested Knowledge AutoLit platform was utilized for literature search, screening, and data extraction. Pooled data were presented as descriptive statistics.Results13 studies comprising 2422 MT procedures were identified. The overall successful recanalization rate was 77.0% (1513/1964) for DMVOs. SR+ASP had a successful recanalization rate of 83.7% (297/355), SR had a 75.6% rate (638/844), while ASP alone had a 74.2% rate (386/520). The overall functional independence rate was 51.3% (851/1659) among DMVOs. The ASP alone group had a functional independence rate of 46.9% (219/467), while functional independence rates of the SR and SR+ASP groups were 51.5% (372/723) and 61.7% (174/282), respectively. Finally, the subarachnoid hemorrhage rates were 1.8% (4/217) for the ASP group, 9.3% (26/281) for the SR group, and 11.9% (41/344) for the SR+ASP group.ConclusionsOur systematic review supports the proposition that MT is a safe and effective treatment option for DMVOs. Additionally, while the SR+ASP group had consistently high rates of clot clearance and good neurological outcomes, the SR and SR+ASP groups also had higher rates of subarachnoid hemorrhage, highlighting the need for improved DMVO treatment devices.

BackgroundThe Pipeline Flex embolization device with Shield technology (PED Shield) is the first flow diverter for brain aneurysm treatment approved in the United States using surface-modified technology. The effect of PED Shield on decreasing perioperative diffusion-weighted imaging positive (DWI+) hits, as a marker for in-human decrease thrombogenicity, is unclear.ObjectiveTo determine if the number of periprocedural DWI+ lesions differs between patients with an aneurysm treated with PED Flex and PED Shield.MethodsThis retrospective study compares the outcomes of consecutive patients with an aneurysm treated with PED Flex and PED Shield. The primary outcome of interest was the occurrence of DWI+ lesions. We also assessed potential predictors of DWI+ lesions and compared the outcomes between on-label and off-label treatment indications.Results89 patients were included, 48 (54%) treated with PED Flex and 41 (46%) with PED Shield. After matching, the incidence of DWI+ lesions was 61% and 62% for the PED Flex and PED Shield groups, respectively. Results were consistent across each model with no significant differences in DWI+ lesions between treatment groups, and effect sizes ranging from OR=1.08 (95% CI 0.41 to 2.89) after propensity score matching to OR=1.84 (95% CI 0.65 to 5.47) after multivariable regression. Multivariable models demonstrated reduced DWI+ lesions with balloon-assisted therapies and posterior circulation treatment, while a significant linear relationship was encountered with fluoroscopy time.ConclusionThere was no significant difference in the incidence of perioperative DWI+ lesions between patients with an aneurysm treated with PED Flex and PED Shield. Larger cohorts are likely needed to demonstrate differences between the devices.