Search

Background: Severe lung disease frequently presents with both refractory hypoxemia and right ventricular (RV) failure. Right ventricular assist device with an oxygenator (OxyRVAD) is an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) configuration of RV bypass that also supplements gas exchange. This systematic review summarises the available literature regarding the use of OxyRVAD in the setting of severe lung disease with associated RV failure., Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were queried on September 27, 2023, for articles describing the use of an OxyRVAD configuration. The main outcome of interest was survival to intensive care unit (ICU) discharge. Data on the duration of OxyRVAD support and device-related complications were also recorded., Results: Out of 475 identified articles, 33 were retained for analysis. Twenty-one articles were case reports, and 12 were case series, representing a total of 103 patients. No article provided a comparison group. Most patients (76.4%) were moved to OxyRVAD from another type of mechanical support. OxyRVAD was used as a bridge to transplant or curative surgery in 37.4% and as a bridge to recovery or decision in 62.6%. Thirty-one patients (30.1%) were managed with the dedicated single-access dual-lumen ProtekDuo cannula. Median time on OxyRVAD was 12 days (interquartile range 8-23 days), and survival to ICU discharge was 63.9%. Device-related complications were infrequently reported., Conclusion: OxyRVAD support is a promising alternative for RV support when gas exchange is compromised, with good ICU survival in selected cases. Comparative analyses in patients with RV failure with and without severe lung disease are needed., (Copyright © 2024 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Given the limited access to invasive vasospastic reactivity testing in Western Countries, there is a need to further develop alternative non-invasive diagnostic methods for vasospastic angina (VSA). Hyperventilation testing (HVT) is defined as a class IIa recommendation to diagnose VSA by the Japanese Society of Cardiology., Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis reported according to the PRISMA statement, we review the mechanisms, methods, modalities and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive HVT for the diagnostic of VSA., Results: A total of 106 articles published between 1980 and 2022 about VSA and HVT were included in the systematic review, among which 16 were included in the meta-analysis for diagnostic accuracy. Twelve electrocardiogram-HVT studies including 804 patients showed a pooled sensitivity of 54% (95% confidence intervals [CI]; 30%-76%) and a pooled specificity of 99% (95% CI; 88%-100%). Four transthoracic echocardiography-HVT studies including 197 patients revealed a pooled sensitivity of 90% (95% CI; 82%-94%) and a pooled specificity of 98% (95% CI; 86%-100%). Six myocardial perfusion imaging-HVT studies including 112 patients yielded a pooled sensitivity of 95% (95% CI; 63%-100%) and a pooled specificity of 78% (95% CI; 19%-98%). Non-invasive HVT resulted in a low rate of adverse events, ventricular arrhythmias being the most frequently reported, and were resolved with the administration of nitroglycerin., Conclusions: Non-invasive HVT offers a safe alternative with high diagnostic accuracy to diagnose VSA in patients with otherwise undiagnosed causes of chest pain., (© 2024 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the recommended mode of revascularization in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction (iLVSD) and multivessel disease. However, contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes have improved with the integration of novel technologies and refinement of revascularization strategies, and PCI is often used in clinical practice in this population. There is a lack of evidence from randomized trials comparing contemporary state-of-the-art PCI versus CABG for the treatment of iLVSD and multivessel disease. This was the impetus for the STICH3C trial (Canadian CABG or PCI in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy), described here., Methods: The STICH3C trial is a prospective, unblinded, international, multicenter trial with an expected sample size of 754 participants from ≈45 centers. Patients with multivessel/left main coronary artery disease and iLVSD with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% considered by the local Heart Team appropriate for and amenable to revascularization by both modes of revascularization will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to state-of-the-art PCI or CABG., Results: The primary end point is the composite of death from any cause, stroke, spontaneous myocardial infarction, urgent repeat revascularization, or heart failure readmission, summarized as a time-to-event outcome. The key hierarchical end point is time to death and frequency of hospitalizations for heart failure. The key safety outcome is a composite of major adverse events. Disease-specific quality-of-life and health economics measures will be compared between groups. Participants will be followed for a median of 5 years, with a minimum follow-up of 4 years., Conclusions: STICH3C will directly inform patients, clinicians, and international practice guidelines about the efficacy and safety of CABG versus PCI in patients with iLVSD. The results will provide novel and broad evidence, including clinical events, health status, and economic assessments, to guide care for patients with iLVSD and severe coronary artery disease., Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/; Unique identifier: NCT05427370., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Vervoort is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship. The other authors report no conflicts.

Vasospastic angina (VSA), or variant angina, is an under-recognized cause of chest pain and myocardial infarction, especially in Western countries. VSA leads to a declined quality of life and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Currently, the diagnosis of VSA relies on invasive testing that requires the direct intracoronary administration of ergonovine or acetylcholine. However, invasive vasoreactivity testing is underutilized. Several non-invasive imaging alternatives have been proposed to screen for VSA. This review aims to discuss the strengths and limitations of available non-invasive imaging tests for vasospastic angina., (© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.)

Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) complicates 5%-10% of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and is the leading cause of early mortality. It remains unclear whether percutaneous mechanical support (pMCS) devices improve post-AMI CS outcome., Methods: A systematic review of original studies comparing the effect of pMCS on AMI-CS mortality was conducted with the use of Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library databases., Results: Of 8672 records, 50 were retained for quantitative analysis. Four additional references were added from other sources. Four references reported a significant mortality reduction with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in patients with failed primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) or managed with thrombolysis. Meta-analyses showed no advantage of Impella over conventional therapy (pooled OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.20-1.46; I 2  = 0.85) and increased mortality compared with IABP (pooled OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.08-1.62; I 2  = 0.85). No study reported a mortality advantage for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) over conventional therapy, IABP, or Impella support. Early mortality might be improved with the addition of IABP or Impella to ECMO. Bleeding Academic Research Consortium ≥ 3 bleeding was increased with every pMCS strategy., Conclusions: The current evidence is of poor to moderate quality, with only 1 in 5 included articles reporting randomised data and several reporting unadjusted outcomes. Yet, there is some evidence to favour IABP use in the setting of thrombolysis or with failed pPCI, and adding IABP or Impella should be considered for patients requiring ECMO., (Copyright © 2022 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is associated with severe morbidity and mortality, and the significance of right ventricular (RV) involvement is unclear. We sought to determine whether RV systolic dysfunction or dilatation is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in women with PPCM., Methods: We conducted a multicentre retrospective cohort study examining the association between echocardiographic RV systolic dysfunction or dilatation at the time of PPCM diagnosis and clinical outcomes. Clinical endpoints of interest were the need for mechanical support, recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction at follow-up, and a combined endpoint of hospitalization for heart failure, cardiac transplant, or death., Results: A total of 67 women, median age 30 years (interquartile range: 7), were diagnosed with PPCM between 1994 and 2015 in 17 participating centres. Twin pregnancies occurred in 11%; 62% of women were multiparous; and 24% had preeclampsia. RV systolic function was impaired in 18 (27%) and dilated in 8 (12%). Seven women required ventricular assistance, and 8 experienced the composite outcome during follow-up (25 [interquartile range 61] months). RV dysfunction was associated with the need for mechanical support (odds ratio 10.10 (95% confidence interval: 1.86-54.81), P  = 0.007), but neither RV dysfunction nor dilatation was associated with left ventricular ejection fraction recovery, the need for cardiac transplant, heart failure hospitalization, or death., Conclusions: RV dysfunction is associated with the need for mechanical support in women with PPCM. These findings may improve risk stratification of complications and clinical management., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common cause of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and heart failure (HF). Revascularization with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) reduces all-cause mortality compared with medical therapy alone for these patients. Despite this, CABG is performed in a minority of patients with HF, partly due to patient unwillingness or inability to undergo major cardiac surgery and partly due to physician reluctance to refer for surgery due to high operative risk. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a less-invasive method of revascularization that has the potential to reduce periprocedural complications compared with CABG in patients with HF. Recent advances in PCI technology and technique have made it realistic to achieve more complete revascularization with PCI in high-risk patients with HF, although no randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of PCI in HF compared with either medical therapy or CABG have been performed. In this review, we discuss the currently available evidence for PCI in HF and the association between the extent of revascularization and clinical outcomes in HF. We also review recent advances in PCI technology and techniques with the potential to improve clinical outcomes in HF. Finally, we discuss emerging clinical trial evidence of revascularization in HF and the large, persistent evidence gaps that should be addressed with future clinical trials of revascularization in HF., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Importance: Persistently depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with adverse prognosis and directs the use of evidence-based treatments to prevent sudden cardiac death and/or progressive heart failure., Objective: To assess adherence with guideline-recommended LVEF reassessment and to study the evolution of LVEF over 6 months of follow-up., Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a multicenter cohort study at Canadian academic and community hospitals with on-site cardiac catheterization services. Patients with type 1 acute MI and LVEF less than or equal to 45% during the index hospitalization were enrolled between January 2018 and August 2019 and were followed-up for 6 months. Data analysis was performed from May 2020 to September 2021., Exposures: Baseline clinical factors, in-hospital care and LVEF, and site-specific features., Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were receipt of repeat LVEF assessment by 6 months and the presence of a persistent LVEF reduction at 2 thresholds: LVEF less than or equal to 40%, prompting consideration of additional medical therapy for heart failure, or LVEF less than or equal to 35%, prompting referral for implanted cardioverter defibrillator in addition to medical therapy., Results: This study included 501 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.3 [13.0] years; 113 women [22.6%]). Overall, 370 patients (73.4%) presented with STEMI, and 454 (90.6%) had in-hospital revascularization. The median (IQR) baseline LVEF was 40% (34%-43%). Of 458 patients (91.4%) who completed the 6-month follow-up, 303 (66.2%; 95% CI, 61.7%-70.5%) had LVEF reassessment, with a range of 46.7% to 90.0% across sites (χ213 = 19.6; P = .11). Participants from community hospitals were more likely than those from academic hospitals to undergo LVEF reassessment (73.6% vs 63.2%; χ21 = 4.50; P = .03), as were those with worse LVEF at baseline. Follow-up LVEF improved by an absolute median (IQR) of 8% (3%-15%). However, 103 patients (34.1%) met the definitions of clinically relevant LVEF reduction, including 52 patients (17.2%) with LVEF less than or equal to 35% and 51 patients (16.9%) with LVEF of 35.1% to 40.0%., Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, approximately 1 in 3 patients with at least mild LVEF reduction after acute MI did not undergo indicated LVEF reassessment within 6 months, suggesting that programs to improve the quality of post-MI care should include measures to ensure that indicated repeat cardiac imaging is performed. In those with follow-up imaging, clinically relevant persistent LVEF reduction was identified in more than one-third of patients.

Stents can be effectively implemented with no x-rays or contrast medium. Modified stents were successfully implanted in 9 of 11 attempted targets (82%) (7 carotid and 4 coronary arteries) using an impedance-sensitive navigation system and optical coherence tomography. Electroanatomical navigation systems can be used to assist interventionalists in performing arterial stenting while minimizing x-ray and contrast use, thereby potentially enhancing safety for both patients and catheterization laboratory staff members., Competing Interests: This investigator-initiated study was supported by an unrestricted grant from Abbott. Dr Jolicoeur has received research grants from Boston Scientific, AstraZeneca, Philips, Jubilant Radiopharma, and Abbott; and is a scientific adviser to Neovasc and Xylocor. Dr Richer, Dr Soucie, Dr McSpadden, Mr Hoopai, and Dr West are employees of Abbott. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (© 2022 The Authors.)

The gold standard to diagnose vasospastic angina is intracoronary reactivity testing, which is performed selectively at dedicated centres. Noninvasive imaging with single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) or echocardiography does not enable accurate localization of spasm or quantification of change in myocardial perfusion in response to an abnormal vasoreactivity. Rubidium-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging ( 82 Rb PET-MPI) with intravenous ergonovine was used to diagnose refractory vasospastic angina in a patient with a complex ischemic syndrome, recent coronary stenting, and persistent atypical angina despite maximal tolerable doses of guideline-directed medical therapy., (Copyright © 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Untargeted metabolomics is used to refine the development of biomarkers for the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease. Myocardial infarction (MI) has major individual and societal consequences for patients, who remain at high risk of secondary events, despite advances in pharmacological therapy. To monitor their differential response to treatment, we performed untargeted plasma metabolomics on 175 patients from the platelet inhibition and patient outcomes (PLATO) trial treated with ticagrelor and clopidogrel, two common P 2 Y 12 inhibitors. We identified a signature that discriminates patients, which involves polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and particularly the omega-3 fatty acids docosahexaenoate and eicosapentaenoate. The known cardiovascular benefits of PUFAs could contribute to the efficacy of ticagrelor. Our work, beyond pointing out the high relevance of untargeted metabolomics in evaluating response to treatment, establishes PUFA metabolism as a pathway of clinical interest in the recovery path from MI., Competing Interests: J.G.H. has received speaker honoraria from Dalcor and District 3 Innovation Centre. R.C.B. has received grants from AstraZeneca during the conduct of the study and has received personal fees from Ionis, Akcea, and Novartis outside the submitted work. M.Y.C. has received research support and consultation honoraria from AstraZeneca. E.M.J. is supported by research grants from Les Fonds la Recherche du Québec en Santé (FRQS) and the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR). R.D.L. has received grants from AstraZeneca during the conduct of the study; has consulted for Bayer, Boehringer Ingleheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck, and Portola; and has received grants and consulted for Sanofi, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Glaxo Smith Kline, Medtronic, and Pfizer outside the submitted work. T.Y.W. has received grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Cryolife and has received grants from Chiesi, Merck, Portola, Regeneron, Boston Scientific, and Abbott outside the submitted work. L.K.N. has received grants from AstraZeneca during the conduct of the study and grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Amylin, and GlaxoSmithKline and has received personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline outside the submitted work. M.L. has received speaker honoraria from Bayer, has participated in industry-funded trials from Idorsia, and has received in-kind and financial support for investigator-initiated grants from Leo Pharma, Roche Diagnostics, and Aggredyne. The remaining authors disclose no competing interests., (© 2021 The Authors.)

Background: Reduction of the coronary sinus was shown to improve angina in patients unsuitable for revascularisation. We assessed whether a percutaneous device that reduces the diameter of the coronary sinus improved outcomes across multiple endpoints in a phase II trial., Methods: We conducted a novel analysis performed as a post hoc efficacy analysis of the COSIRA ( Co ronary Si nus R educer for Treatment of Refractory A ngina) trial, which enrolled patients with Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class 3-4 refractory angina. We used four domains: symptoms (CCS Angina Scale), functionality (total exercise duration), ischaemia (imaging) and health-related quality of life. For all domains, we specified a meaningful threshold for change. The primary endpoint was defined as a probability of ≥80% that the reducer exceeded the meaningful threshold on two or more domains (group-level analysis) or that the average efficacy score in the reducer group exceeded the sham control group by at least two points (patient-level analysis)., Results: We randomised 104 participants to either a device that narrows to coronary sinus (n=52) or a sham implantation (n=52). The reducer group met the prespecified criteria for concordance at the group level and demonstrated improvement in symptoms (0.59 CCS grade, 95% credible interval (CrI)=0.22 to 0.95), total exercise duration (+27.9%, 95% CrI=2.8% to 59.8%) and quality of life (stability +11.2 points, 95% CrI=3.3 to 19.1; perception +11.0, 95% CrI=3.3 to 18.7)., Conclusions: The reducer concordantly improved symptoms, functionality and quality of life compared with a sham intervention in patients with angina unsuitable for coronary revascularisation. Concordant analysis such as this one can help interpret early phase trials and guide the decision to pursue a clinical programme into a larger confirmatory trial., Trail Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01205893., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention is used to restore blood flow in the infarct-related coronary artery, followed by immediate stenting to prevent reocclusion. Stents implanted in thrombus-laden arteries cause distal embolization, which paradoxically impairs myocardial reperfusion and ventricular function. Whether a strategy of delayed stenting improves outcomes in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is uncertain., Methods: The Primary Reperfusion Secondary Stenting (PRIMACY) is a Bayesian prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point trial in which delayed vs immediate stenting in patients with STEMI were compared for prevention of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, heart failure, or unplanned target vessel revascularization at 9 months. All participants were immediately reperfused, but those assigned to the delayed arm underwent stenting after an interval of 24 to 48 hours. This interval was bridged with antithrombin therapy to reduce thrombus burden. In the principal Bayesian hierarchical random effects analysis, data from exchangeable trials will be combined into a study prior and updated with PRIMACY into a posterior probability of efficacy., Results: A total of 305 participants were randomized across 15 centres in France and Canada between April 2014 and September 2017. At baseline, the median age of participants was 59 years, 81% were male, and 3% had a history of percutaneous coronary intervention. Results from PRIMACY will be updated from the patient-level data of 1568 participants enrolled in the Deferred Stent Trial in STEMI (DEFER; United Kingdom), Minimalist Immediate Mechanical Intervention (MIMI; France), Danish Trial in Acute Myocardial Infarction-3 (DANAMI-3; Denmark), and Impact of Immediate Stent Implantation Versus Deferred Stent Implantation on Infarct Size and Microvascular Perfusion in Patients With ST Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (INNOVATION, South Korea) trials., Conclusions: We expect to clarify whether delayed stenting can safely reduce the occurrence of adverse cardiovascular end points compared with immediate stenting in patients with STEMI., (Copyright © 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The optimal revascularization strategy for patients with ischaemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (iLVSD) remains controversial. We aimed to compare percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and medical therapy (MT) in a network meta-analysis., Methods: All randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing any combination of PCI, CABG and MT in patients with iLVSD were analysed in a frequentist network meta-analysis (generic inverse variance method). Primary outcome was mortality at longest available follow-up. Secondary outcomes were cardiac death, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) and repeat revascularization (RR)., Results: Twenty-three studies were included (n = 23 633; 4 randomized controlled trials). Compared to CABG, PCI was associated with higher mortality [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-1.53], cardiac death (IRR 1.65, 95% CI 1.18-2.33), MI (IRR 2.18, 95% CI 1.70-2.80) and RR (IRR 3.75, 95% CI 2.89-4.85). Compared to CABG, MT was associated with higher mortality (IRR 1.52, 95% CI 1.26-1.84), cardiac death (IRR 3.83, 95% CI 2.12-6.91), MI (IRR 3.22, 95% CI 1.52-6.79) and RR (IRR 3.37, 95% CI 1.67-6.79). Compared to MT, PCI was associated with lower cardiac death (IRR 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.78). CABG ranked as the best revascularization strategy for mortality, cardiac death, MI and RR; MT ranked as the strategy associated with the lowest incidence of stroke. Left ventricular ejection fraction, year of study, use of drug-eluting stents did not affect relative treatment effects., Conclusions: CABG appears to be the best therapy for iLVSD, although mainly based on observational data. Definitive randomized controlled trials comparing CABG and PCI in iLVSD are required., Prospero Registration Id: 132414., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Although apical and midventricular Takotsubo cardiomyopathies (TTCs) share common triggers and pathophysiological features, little is known about the potential differences in left ventricular (LV) mechanistic properties between these TTC phenotypes. We sought to investigate whether LV systolic and/or diastolic function, as assessed invasively by left heart catheterization (LHC), differ according to ballooning patterns in the acute phase of TTC. One hundred and fourteen TTC patients were retrospectively identified between January 2009 and December 2015 at the University Hospital of Strasbourg, France. A comprehensive list of LV quantitative parameters was derived from LHC analysis for each patient. We examined 2 groups of patients according to ballooning patterns in the acute phase of TTC: patients with apical ballooning ("Apical group"; n = 76) and those with midventricular ballooning ("Midventricular group"; n = 38). LV minimal diastolic pressure (8.72 ± 6.72 vs. 5.02 ± 6.08 mmHg; p = 0.004), LV end diastolic pressure (23.11 ± 8.32 vs. 18.84 ± 8.06 mmHg; p = 0.01), and LV diastolic stiffness (LV stiffness 1: 0.29 ± 0.23 vs. 18.84 ± 8.06 mmHg/mL; p = 0.04-LV stiffness 2: 0.16 ± 0.08 vs. 0.12 ± 0.05 mmHg/mL; p = 0.005) were significantly higher in patients with apical TTC than in the midventricular group. Concomitantly, these findings were associated with significantly higher BNP levels in the apical group (923.91 ± 1164.53 vs. 418.71 ± 557.75 pg/mL; p = 0.004) than in the midventricular group. In the acute phase of stress cardiomyopathy, the classic apical form of TTC is associated with poorer diastolic function compared to the midventricular ballooning variant, as assessed through direct invasive hemodynamic measurements using LHC.

Background: The STICH trial showed superiority of coronary artery bypass plus medical treatment (CABG) over medical treatment alone (MED) in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%. In previous publications, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) prior to CABG was associated with worse prognosis., Objectives: The main purpose of this study was to analyse if prior PCI influenced outcomes in STICH., Methods and Results: Patients in the STICH trial (n = 1212), followed for a median time of 9.8 years, were included in the present analyses. In the total population, 156 had a prior PCI (74 and 82, respectively, in the MED and CABG groups). In those with vs. without prior PCI, the adjusted hazard-ratios (aHRs) were 0.92 (95% CI = 0.74-1.15) for all-cause mortality, 0.85 (95% CI = 0.64-1.11) for CV mortality, and 1.43 (95% CI = 1.15-1.77) for CV hospitalization. In the group randomized to CABG without prior PCI, the aHRs were 0.82 (95% CI = 0.70-0.95) for all-cause mortality, 0.75 (95% CI = 0.62-0.90) for CV mortality and 0.67 (95% CI = 0.56-0.80) for CV hospitalization. In the group randomized to CABG with prior PCI, the aHRs were 0.76 (95% CI = 0.50-1.15) for all-cause mortality, 0.81 (95% CI = 0.49-1.36) for CV mortality and 0.61 (95% CI = 0.41-0.90) for CV hospitalization. There was no evidence of interaction between randomized treatment and prior PCI for any endpoint (all adjusted p > 0.05)., Conclusion: In the STICH trial, prior PCI did not affect the outcomes of patients whether they were treated medically or surgically, and the superiority of CABG over MED remained unchanged regardless of prior PCI., Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov; Identifier: NCT00023595., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Prompt revascularization is often required in acute coronary syndromes (ACS), whereas stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) may allow for more measured procedural planning. Whether the acuity of presentation preferentially affects outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) is unknown. We investigated whether the acuity of presentation discriminated patients who derived a differential benefit from PCI versus CABG in the randomized Evaluation of XIENCE versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization (EXCEL) trial., Methods: We used multivariable Cox models to assess the interaction between the acuity of presentation, type of revascularization and outcomes in patients with low or intermediate SYNTAX scores enrolled in EXCEL., Results: At baseline, 1151 patients (60.7%) presented with SIHD and 746 patients (39.3%) presented with an ACS. The acuity of presentation was not associated with the primary endpoint of all-cause death, MI, or stroke at 3 years (multivariable adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.94; 95% CI 0.70-1.26, P = .64). The primary endpoint rate was similar in patients assigned to PCI versus CABG whether they presented with SIHD (adjusted HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.73-1.48]) or with ACS (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.54-1.26) (P interaction  = .34)., Conclusions: The acuity of presentation did not predict outcomes in patients with LMCAD undergoing revascularization, nor did it discriminate patients who derive greater event-free survival from PCI versus CABG., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Comorbidity indexes derived from administrative databases are essential tools of research in global health. We sought to develop and validate a novel cardiac-specific comorbidity index, and to compare its accuracy with the generic Charlson-Deyo and Elixhauser comorbidity indexes., Methods: We derived the cardiac-specific comorbidity index from consecutive patients who were admitted to hospital at a tertiary-care cardiology hospital in Quebec. We used logistic regression analysis and incorporated age, sex and 22 clinically relevant comorbidities to build the index. We compared the cardiac-specific comorbidity index with refitted Charlson-Deyo and Elixhauser comorbidity indexes using the C-statistic and net reclassification improvement to predict in-hospital death, and the Akaike information criterion to predict length of stay. We validated our findings externally in an independent cohort obtained from a provincial registry of coronary disease in Alberta., Results: The novel cardiac-specific comorbidity index outperformed the refitted generic Charlson-Deyo and Elixhauser comorbidity indexes for predicting in-hospital mortality in the derivation population ( n = 10 137): C-statistic 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94-0.9) v. 0.81 (95% CI 0.77-0.84) and 0.86 (95% CI 0.82-0.89), respectively. In the validation population ( n = 17 877), the cardiac-specific comorbidity index was similarly better: C-statistic 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.94) v. 0.76 (95% CI 0.71-0.81) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.78-0.86), respectively, and also numerically outperformed the Charlson-Deyo and Elixhauser comorbidity indexes for predicting 1-year mortality (C-statistic 0.78 [95% CI 0.76-0.80] v. 0.75 [95% CI 0.73-0.77] and 0.77 [95% CI 0.75-0.79], respectively). Similarly, the cardiac-specific comorbidity index showed better fit for the prediction of length of stay. The net reclassification improvement using the cardiac-specific comorbidity index for the prediction of death was 0.290 compared with the Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index and 0.192 compared with the Elixhauser comorbidity index., Interpretation: The cardiac-specific comorbidity index predicted in-hospital and 1-year death and length of stay in cardiovascular populations better than existing generic models. This novel index may be useful for research of cardiology outcomes performed with large administrative databases., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Stephen Wilton has received consultant fees from Arca Biopharma and research grants from Medtronic of Canada, Abbott and Boston Scientific. No other competing interests were declared. This article has been peer reviewed., (© 2019 Joule Inc. or its licensors.)

Aims: Bromocriptine is thought to facilitate left ventricular (LV) recovery in peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) through inhibition of prolactin secretion. However, this potential therapeutic effect remains controversial and was incompletely studied in diverse populations., Methods and Results: Consecutive women with new-onset PPCM (n = 76) between 1994 and 2015 in Quebec, Canada, were classified according to treatment (n = 8, 11%) vs. no treatment (n = 68, 89%) with bromocriptine. We assessed LV functional recovery at mid-term (6 months) and long-term (last follow-up) and compared outcomes among groups. Women treated with bromocriptine experienced better mid-term left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery from 23 ± 10% at baseline to 55 ± 12% at 6 months, compared with a change from 30 ± 12% at baseline to 45 ± 13% at 6 months in women treated with standard medical therapy (P interaction < 0.01). At long-term, a similar positive association was found with bromocriptine (9% greater LVEF variation, P interaction < 0.01). In linear regressions adjusted for obstetrical, clinical, echocardiographic, and pharmacological variables, treatment with bromocriptine was associated with a greater improvement in LVEF [β coefficient (standard error), 14.1 (4.4); P = 0.03]. However, there was no significant association between bromocriptine use and the combined occurrence of all-cause death and heart failure events (hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.15 to 9.31), using univariable Cox regressions based over a cumulative follow-up period of 285 patient-years., Conclusions: In women newly diagnosed with PPCM, treatment with bromocriptine was independently associated with greater LV functional recovery., (© 2018 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Thrombocytopenia (TP) is common in hospitalized patients. In the context of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), TP has been linked to adverse clinical outcomes. We present a systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence on the clinical importance of preexisting and in-hospital acquired TP in the context of ACS. Specifically, we address (a) the prevalence and associated factors with TP in the context of ACS; and (b) the association between TP and all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), and major bleeding. We conducted systematic literature searches in MEDLINE and Web of Science. For the meta-analysis, we fit linear mixed models with a random study-specific intercept for the aggregate outcomes. A total of 16 studies and 190 915 patients were included in this study. Of these patients, 8.8% ± 1.2% presented with preexisting TP while 5.8% ± 1.0% developed TP after hospital admission. Preexisting TP was not statistically significantly associated with adverse outcomes. Acquired TP was associated with greater risk of all-cause mortality (risk difference [RD]: 4.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2-6%; p  = 0.04), MACE (RD: 8.5%; 95% CI: 1-16.0%; p  = 0.037), and major bleeding (RD: 11.9%; 95% CI: 5-19%; p  = 0.005). In conclusion, TP is a prevalent condition in patients admitted for an ACS and identifies a high-risk patient population more likely to experience ischemic and bleeding complications, as well as higher mortality.

Aims: Autologous CD34+ (auto-CD34+) cells represent an attractive option for the treatment of refractory angina. Three double-blinded randomized trials (n = 304) compared intramyocardial (IM) auto-CD34+ cells with IM placebo injections to affect total exercise time (TET), angina frequency (AF), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Patient-level data were pooled from the Phase I, Phase II ACT-34, ACT-34 extension, and Phase III RENEW trials to determine the efficacy and safety of auto-CD34+ cells., Methods and Results: Treatment effects for TET were analysed using an analysis of covariance mixed-effects model and for AF using Poisson regression in a log linear model with repeated measures. The Kaplan-Meier rate estimates for MACE were compared using the log-rank test. Autologous CD34+ cell therapy improved TET by 46.6 s [3 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 13.0 s-80.3 s; P = 0.007], 49.5 s (6 months, 95% CI 9.3-89.7; P = 0.016), and 44.7 s (12 months, 95% CI - 2.7 s-92.1 s; P = 0.065). The relative frequency of angina was 0.78 (95% CI 0.63-0.98; P = 0.032), 0.66 (0.48-0.91; P = 0.012), and 0.58 (0.38-0.88; P = 0.011) at 3-, 6- and 12-months in auto-CD34+ compared with placebo patients. Results remained concordant when analysed by treatment received and when confined to the Phase III dose of 1 × 105 cells/kg. Autologous CD34 + cell therapy significantly decreased mortality (12.1% vs. 2.5%; P = 0.0025) and numerically reduced MACE (38.9% vs. 30.0; P = 0.14) at 24 months., Conclusion: Treatment with auto-CD34+ cells resulted in clinically meaningful durable improvements in TET and AF at 3-, 6- and 12-months, as well as a reduction in 24-month mortality in this patient-level meta-analysis.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has been extensively used for cardiopulmonary support in cardiogenic shock. However, its clinical value in the management of pheochromocytoma crisis remains unclear. We report a rare case of life-threatening cardiogenic shock managed with peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with endovascular left ventricular venting, in a 40-year-old female patient, in the setting of unknown adrenal pheochromocytoma. We highlight the life-saving role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in undiagnosed endocrine emergencies, allowing cardiac and end-organ recovery, and giving time for accurate diagnosis and specific treatment in such unusual situations.

Objectives: This study sought to assess the relative merit of surgical correction (SC) versus transcatheter reduction on long-term outcomes in patients with significant paravalvular leak (PVL) refractory to medical therapy., Background: PVL is the most frequent dysfunction following prosthetic valve replacement. Although repeat surgery is the gold standard, transcatheter reduction (TR) of PVL has been associated with reduced mortality., Methods: From 1994 to 2014, 231 patients underwent SC (n = 151) or TR (n = 80) PVL correction. Propensity matching and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the effect of either intervention on long-term rates of all-cause death or hospitalization for heart failure. Survival after TR and SC were further compared with the survival in a matched general population and to matched patients undergoing their first surgical valve replacement., Results: Over a median follow-up of 3.5 years, SC was associated with an important reduction in all-cause death or hospitalization for heart failure compared with TR (hazard ratio: 0.28; 95% confidence interval: 0.18 to 0.44; p < 0.001). There was a trend towards reduced all-cause death following SC versus TR (hazard ratio: 0.61; 95% confidence interval: 0.37 to 1.02; p = 0.06). Neither intervention normalized survival when compared with a general population or patients undergoing their first surgical valve replacement., Conclusions: In patients with significant prosthetic PVL, surgery is associated with better long-term outcomes compared with transcatheter intervention, but results in important perioperative mortality and morbidity. Future studies are needed in the face of increasing implementation of transcatheter PVL interventions across the world., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Research is a core aspect of training in academic medicine, but fellows face many challenges thwarting their ability to perform clinically meaningful projects. The concept of a multicentre clinical trial collectively operated by fellows, and integrated longitudinally into training, has never been described. In this article, the authors expose the key principles of Collectively Operated Fellow-Initiated Research (COFIR) that they put in place. The aim of COFIR is to introduce a cohort of fellows to the career of clinician-scientists by conducting a longitudinal research project integrated into the curriculum of their clinical fellowship at a level they would not have access to as single individuals. First, fellows must formulate the research hypothesis to generate a patient-oriented research idea that resonates with a large group of trainees. Second, fellows must be actively involved in the multifaceted aspects of research under the mentorship of clinical scientists. Third, fellows must document and disseminate the newly acquired methodological know-how. Finally, fellows must put the safety of patients above any other consideration. Examples of how these principles were applied in a research project are provided in this article; it represents a call to action for fellows to collectively contribute to the production of significant medical research., (Copyright © 2017 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Transradial access (TRA) has reduced vascular access-site complication (VASC) and bleeding rates in patients undergoing coronary angiography and intervention. A "radial-first" approach should be adopted and indications of TRA extended in order to maximize its beneficial effect. However, in certain clinical scenarios, transfemoral access (TFA) is a preferable or a mandatory route to successfully perform the procedure. Since the widespread adoption of TRA, a paradoxical increase in VASC rates has been observed in patients undergoing TFA, which might be attributed to a combination of increased risk profile of both the procedures and the patients, and a loss of skills in securing TFA by those who are now default radial operators. In the present article we provide recommendations on how to optimize patient selection for TRA and TFA, how to manage access site crossover, and how to perform state-of-the-art femoral artery puncture. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Factors influencing the management of patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) are poorly described. We sought to analyze the clinical and angiographic variables influencing the decision-making process of patients with CTO. Consecutive patients with at least 1 coronary artery CTO were included and categorized as managed either by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), or medical therapy (MT). Patients with previous CABG were excluded. The CTO SYNTAX score (CTO-SS) was defined as the ratio between the score attributed to the CTO lesion in the SYNTAX score calculation and the total SYNTAX score. Independent predictors of management strategies were sought. A total of 510 patients were included (CTO incidence: 20%): 9% were treated with PCI, 34% with CABG, and 57% with MT. SYNTAX score was lowest in PCI (14.8 [11.0 to 18.5]) and highest in CABG (31.5 [25.0 to 38.8], p <0.0001). PCI was attempted more often in patients with higher CTO-SS (i.e., those with higher contribution to the overall SYNTAX score from the CTO lesion; 88% had a CTO-SS >0.5). Conversely, CABG was preferred in subjects with lower CTO-SS (61% had a CTO-SS ≤0.5, p <0.0001). Age, ejection fraction, SYNTAX score, and age of the CTO were independent predictors of revascularization. At mid-term follow-up, unsuccessful revascularization or MT was independently associated with death (hazard ratio 7.2, p = 0.0005). In conclusion, CTOs are frequently documented in clinical practice. However, less than a half is revascularized. Management strategies are influenced by angiographic variables such as the SYNTAX score and the newly proposed CTO-SS., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Alongside the remarkable advances in medical and invasive therapies for the treatment of ischemic heart disease, an increasing number of patients with advanced coronary artery disease unsuitable for revascularization continue to suffer from angina pectoris despite optimal medical therapy. Patients with chronic angina have poor quality of life and increased levels of anxiety and depression. A considerable number of innovative therapeutic modalities for the treatment of chronic angina have been investigated over the years; however, none of these therapeutic options has become a standard of care, and none are widely utilized. Current treatment options for refractory angina focus on medical therapy and secondary risk factor modification. Interventions to create increased pressure in the coronary sinus may alleviate myocardial ischemia by forcing redistribution of coronary blood flow from the less ischemic subepicardium to the more ischemic subendocardium, thus relieving symptoms of ischemia. Percutaneous, transvenous implantation of a balloon expandable, hourglass-shaped, stainless steel mesh in the coronary sinus to create a fixed focal narrowing and to increase backwards pressure, may serve as a new device-based therapy destined for the treatment of refractory angina pectoris.

Objectives: This study tested whether intramyocardial (IM) administration of mobilized, purified autologous CD34(+) cells would improve total exercise time (TET) and angina frequency in patients with refractory angina., Background: IM administration of autologous CD34(+) cells has been associated consistently with improvements in functional capacity and angina symptoms in early phase clinical trials., Methods: RENEW (Efficacy and Safety of Targeted Intramyocardial Delivery of Auto CD34+ Stem Cells for Improving Exercise Capacity in Subjects With Refractory Angina) was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial comparing IM CD34(+) administration with no intervention (open-label standard of care) or IM placebo injections (active control). The primary efficacy endpoint was change in TET at 12 months. Key secondary endpoints include changes in angina frequency at 3, 6, and 12 months, and TET at 3 and 6 months. The key safety analysis was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events through 24 months., Results: The sponsor terminated the study for strategic considerations after enrollment of 112 of planned 444 patients. The difference in TET between patients treated with cell therapy versus placebo was 61.0 s at 3 months (95% confidence interval (CI): -2.9 to 124.8; p = 0.06), 46.2 s at 6 months (95% CI: -28.0 to 120.4; p = 0.22), and 36.6 s at 12 months (95% CI: -56.1 to 129.2; p = 0.43); angina frequency was improved at 6 months (relative risk: 0.63; p = 0.05). Autologous CD34(+) cell therapy seemed to be safe compared with both open-label standard of care and active control (major adverse cardiovascular events 67.9% [standard of care], 42.9% (active control), 46.0% [CD34(+)])., Conclusions: Due to early termination, RENEW was an incomplete experiment; however, the results were consistent with observations from earlier phase studies. These findings underscore the need for a definitive trial. (Efficacy and Safety of Targeted Intramyocardial Delivery of Auto CD34(+) Stem Cells for Improving Exercise Capacity in Subjects With Refractory Angina [RENEW]: NCT01508910)., (Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess whether the benefits conferred by radial access (RA) at an individual level are offset by a proportionally greater incidence of vascular access site complications (VASC) at a population level when femoral access (FA) is performed., Background: The recent widespread adoption of RA for cardiac catheterization has been associated with increased rates of VASCs when FA is attempted., Methods: Logistic regression was used to calculate the adjusted VASC rate in a contemporary cohort of consecutive patients (2006 to 2008) where both RA and FA were used, and compared it with the adjusted VASC rate observed in a historical control cohort (1996 to 1998) where only FA was used. We calculated the adjusted attributable risk to estimate the proportion of VASC attributable to the introduction of RA in FA patients of the contemporary cohort., Results: A total of 17,059 patients were included. At a population level, the VASC rate was higher in the overall contemporary cohort compared with the historical cohort (adjusted rates: 2.91% vs. 1.98%; odds ratio [OR]: 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17 to 1.89; p = 0.001). In the contemporary cohort, RA patients experienced fewer VASC than FA patients (adjusted rates: 1.44% vs. 4.19%; OR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.48; p < 0.001). We observed a higher VASC rate in FA patients in the contemporary cohort compared with the historical cohort (adjusted rates: 4.19% vs. 1.98%; OR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.67 to 2.81; p < 0.001). This finding was consistent for both diagnostic and therapeutic catheterizations separately. The proportion of VASCs attributable to RA in the contemporary FA patients was estimated at 52.7%., Conclusions: In a contemporary population where both RA and FA were used, the safety benefit associated with RA is offset by a paradoxical increase in VASCs among FA patients. The existence of this radial paradox should be taken into consideration, especially among trainees and default radial operators., (Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is a rare disorder with potentially fatal consequences, which occurs mainly in previously healthy women. The aetiology of PPCM remains unknown and various pathologic mechanisms have been proposed, including immune-mediated injuries and impaired response to oxidative stress and inflammatory cytokines. Several therapies have been studied, but few have been validated in a well-designed randomized controlled trial., Methods: In the present study we sought to review the medical treatment intended for acute PPCM. To this end, we performed a systematic review of the literature of randomized and nonrandomized prospective clinical studies., Results: We identified 2 randomized controlled trials that evaluated the dopamine agonist bromocriptine and the inotrope levosimendan, respectively, and 1 nonrandomized study that evaluated the nonselective phosphodiesterase inhibitor pentoxifylline. We reviewed the pathophysiological, pharmacological, and clinical properties for each treatment option identified. Bromocriptine and pentoxifylline both improved left ventricular systolic function and patient-oriented clinical end points and levosimendan did not improve mortality or echocardiographic findings of PPCM., Conclusions: In this review we identified bromocriptine and pentoxifylline, but not levosimendan, as potentially useful agents to improve left ventricle function and outcomes in PPCM., (Copyright © 2015 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, coronary artery disease (CAD), and angina are often thought to have a worse prognosis and a greater prognostic benefit from coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery than those without angina., Objectives: This study investigated: 1) whether angina was associated with a worse prognosis; 2) whether angina identified patients who had a greater survival benefit from CABG; and 3) whether CABG improved angina in patients with LV systolic dysfunction and CAD., Methods: We performed an analysis of the STICH (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure) trial, in which 1,212 patients with an ejection fraction ≤35% and CAD were randomized to CABG or medical therapy. Multivariable Cox and logistic models were used to assess long-term clinical outcomes., Results: At baseline, 770 patients (64%) reported angina. Among patients assigned to medical therapy, all-cause mortality was similar in patients with and without angina (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79 to 1.38). The effect of CABG was similar whether the patient had angina (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.71 to 1.13) or not (HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.50 to 0.94; p interaction = 0.14). Patients assigned to CABG were more likely to report improvement in angina than those assigned to medical therapy alone (odds ratio: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.90; p < 0.01)., Conclusions: Angina does not predict all-cause mortality in medically treated patients with LV systolic dysfunction and CAD, nor does it identify patients who have a greater survival benefit from CABG. However, CABG does improve angina to a greater extent than medical therapy alone. (Comparison of Surgical and Medical Treatment for Congestive Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease [STICH]; NCT00023595)., (Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patient decision aids (PtDAs) supplement advice from health care professionals by communicating the absolute risk or benefit of treatment options (i.e., X/100). As such, PtDAs have been amenable to binary outcomes only. We aimed to develop and test the validity of the Conversion to Risk Estimates through Application of Normal Theory (CREATE) method for estimating absolute risk based on continuous outcome data., Methods: CREATE is designed to derive an estimate of the proportion of those who experience a clinically relevant degree of change (CRDoC). We used a 2-stage validation process using real and simulated change score data, respectively. First, using raw data from published intervention trials, we calculated the proportion of patients with a CRDoC and compared that with our CREATE-derived estimate using chi-square tests of association. Second, 200,000 simulated distributions of change scores were generated with widely varying distribution characteristics. Actual and CREATE-derived estimates were compared for each simulated distribution, and relative differences were summarized graphically., Results: The absolute difference between the estimated and actual CRDoC did not exceed 5% for any of the samples based on real data. Applying the CREATE method to 200,000 simulated scenarios demonstrated that the CREATE method should be avoided for outcomes where the underlying distribution can be reasonably assumed to have high levels of skew or kurtosis., Conclusion: Our results suggest that standard statistical theory can be used to estimate continuous outcomes in absolute terms with reasonable accuracy for use in PtDAs; caution is advised if outcome summary statistics are assumed to have been derived from highly skewed distributions., (© The Author(s) 2015.)

Objectives: This study aimed at comparing direct stenting (DS) versus stenting with pre-dilation (SP) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), using a systematic review and meta-analysis of published evidence., Background: There is conflicting evidence whether stenting strategy impacts clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI., Methods: We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL, from inception to December 2014. The primary endpoint was mortality. Secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), ST-segment resolution, and angiographic outcomes., Results: A total of 9,331 patients enrolled in 12 studies (3 randomized controlled trials, RCTs; 9 non-randomized studies, NRSs) were included. DS was associated with lower mortality (OR 0.55; 95%CI: 0.33-0.94; P = 0.03) in NRSs, and overall (OR 0.56; 95%CI: 0.37-0.86; P = 0.008). Mortality was non-significantly reduced in RCTs (OR 0.56; 95%CI: 0.26-1.23; P = 0.15). DS was also associated with lower MACE rate (OR 0.71; 95%CI 0.60-0.84; P < 0.0001) in NRSs, but not in RCTs (OR 0.99; 95%CI: 0.61-1.60; P = 0.96). ST-segment resolution, no reflow, final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow and final TIMI myocardial perfusion or blush grade were significantly better with DS in NRSs, and non-significantly better in RCTs., Conclusions: The available evidence suggests that DS in STEMI might be associated with better clinical and procedural outcomes, as compared with SP. However, the fact that RCTs account for the minority of available data and that most of the available studies poorly reflect current clinical practice, as well as the existence of publication bias, preclude drawing definitive conclusions., (© 2015, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)