Search

The treatment of partial, displaced radial head fractures is determined not only by the type of fracture, but also by patient characteristics such as age, occupation, hand dominance, mechanism of injury, and concomitant injuries and comorbidities. The goal of this study was to employ the Delphi method to achieve consensus on the management of patients with radial head fractures, utilizing the experience of the ASES elbow fracture-dislocation multicenter study group and Mayo Elbow Club surgeons.The initial survey was sent to participants, which included consent to participate in the study and questions about their experience, knowledge, and interest in participating in the Delphi method.We used both open-ended and category-based questions. The second questionnaire generated 76 variables, and individual questions with mean Likert ratings of2.0 or4.0 were deemed significant and merged to form multifactorial clinical scenarios relating to both nonoperative and operative management, respectively.Of surgeons who responded to the questionnaire; 64% were from the United States, while the remainder were from overseas practices. Years in practice on average were 12.4 years (range, 1-40). Seven of the 76 factors met the criteria of a mean Likert score of2.0 or4.0. These factors were; age, block to the range of motion (ROM) after aspiration/injection, crepitation with ROM, tenderness over the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) and/or interosseous membrane (dorsal forearm), gap and/or displacement2mm on imaging, complete loss of contact of the head with rest of radius on imaging, fracture head involvement 30% on imaging. 22 (46%) of the 96 clinical scenarios gained90% consensus in favor of surgical treatment, whereas 8 (17%) reached90% consensus in favor of non-operative treatment.Obtaining expert consensus on the treatment of radial head fractures remains challenging. Certain factors such as gap/displacement ≥ 2mm without complete loss of contact, ≥ 30% head involvement with a block to a range of motion regardless of tenderness over DRUJ or interosseous membrane (dorsal forearm) or crepitation when the patient was80 years of age led to a recommendation of operative treatment in 100% of the surveyed surgeons. Patients greater than 80 years of age with no block to ROM after aspiration/injection, no crepitation with ROM, and no tenderness on DRUJ/interosseous membrane (dorsal forearm) were recommended for non-operative treatment regardless of the size of the radial head involvement on imaging.

The proximal humerus is a common location for primary tumors, benign lesions, and metastatic disease. Advances in neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy have allowed for limb-salvage surgery in most of the cases. There are numerous of options for surgical management of proximal humerus lesions and the decision to pursue one over another depends on factors such as age, comorbidities, pathology, location within the proximal humerus, planned resection margins/size of defect, and bone quality. Long-term outcomes for these techniques tend to be retrospective comparative studies, with recent studies highlighting the improved outcomes of reverse total shoulders.

The orthopaedic surgery residency selection process has grown more competitive over recent years, with programs receiving an unprecedented number of applications. As an effort to target applications to programs of interest, the American Orthopaedic Association has announced the introduction of a formal preference-signaling program into the 2022 to 2023 orthopaedic surgery residency selection cycle. This system will allow applicants to assign "signals" to a total of 30 programs. The purpose of this article was to (1) discuss implications of the new preference-signaling program, (2) introduce the framework of the "strategic signaling spear" for applicants to conceptualize the power of all methods of preference-signaling to improve their odds of matching, and (3) describe the role of strong mentorship at all stages of the residency application process.

Peripheral nerve injuries associated with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) are rarely reported and are often dismissed as neuropraxias, particularly in the setting of perioperative nerve blocks. The purpose of this study was to evaluate nerve injuries following rTSA to determine if there is a pattern of injury and to evaluate outcomes of patients who sustain an intraoperative nerve injury.A retrospective review was performed identifying patients who underwent rTSA and had a concomitant major nerve injury who were referred to a multidisciplinary peripheral nerve injury clinic. Demographic data, preoperative nerve block use, physical examination, electrodiagnostic studies, injury pattern, and time from injury to referral was collected. Radiographs, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) score, and outcomes surveys were obtained at final follow-up.Twenty-two patients were identified with postoperative nerve injuries. Average time from injury to referral was 9.0 months, with 18.8 months' follow-up. Eight patients had undergone prior shoulder surgery, and 11 patients had prior shoulder trauma. Injury patterns were variable and involved diffuse pan-plexopathies with severity localized to the posterior and medial cords (11), the upper trunk (5), lateral cord (2), and axillary nerve (4). The average postoperative acromiohumeral distance (AHD) was 3.7 cm, with an average change of 2.9 cm. The average postoperative lateral humeral offset (LHO) was 1.1 cm, with an average change of 0.2 cm. Seventeen patients were confirmed to have undergone preoperative nerve blocks, which were initially attributed as the etiology of nerve injury. Eighteen patients were initially treated with observation: 11 experienced residual debilitating neuropathic pain and/or disability, and 7 had substantial improvement. One patient underwent nerve transfers, whereas the others underwent procedures for hand dysfunction improvement. The average QuickDASH score was 53.5 at average of 4 years post rTSA.Although uncommon, permanent peripheral nerve injuries following rTSA do occur with debilitating effects. Preoperative regional blocks were used in most cases, but none of the blocks could be directly attributed to the nerve injuries. Nerve injuries were likely secondary to traction at the time of arthroplasty and/or substantial distalization and lateralization of the implants. Patients with medial cord injuries had the most debilitating loss of hand function. Surgeons should be cognizant of these injuries and make a timely referral to a peripheral nerve specialist.

To investigate the incidence of anteroinferior glenoid rim fractures (AGRFs) after anterior shoulder instability (ASI) in patients aged 50 years or older, identify risk factors for surgical intervention for AGRFs, compare initial treatment strategies, and compare clinical outcomes of patients with and without associated AGRFs.An established geographic medical record system was used to identify patients aged 50 years or older with ASI between 1994 and 2016. Patients with radiographic evidence of AGRFs were identified and matched 1:1 to patients without AGRFs. Outcome measures included recurrent instability, recurrent pain events, conversion to arthroplasty, and osteoarthritis graded with the Samilson-Prieto classification for post-instability arthritis.Overall, 177 patients were identified, with a mean follow-up period of 10.8 years. Of these patients, 41 (23.2%) had AGRFs and were matched to 41 control patients without AGRFs. The average age was 58.6 and 58.2 years for the AGRF and control groups, respectively. Rates of surgical intervention (27% vs 49%), recurrent instability (12% vs 20%), progression of osteoarthritis (34% vs 39%), and conversion to arthroplasty (2% vs 5%) were similar between AGRF patients and controls. For patients with AGRFs, increased bone fragment size (odds ratio, 1.1) and increased body mass index (odds ratio, 1.2) correlated with an increased risk of surgery. The cutoff value for an increased risk of surgery in patients with AGRFs was a fragment size 33% of the glenoid width or greater.Of patients aged 50 years or older at presentation of ASI, 23.2% presented with an associated AGRF. A fragment size 33% of the glenoid width or greater and a higher patient body mass index were significant factors for surgical intervention; however, most patients did not require surgery and still showed acceptable clinical outcomes, and the most common reason for surgical intervention was a rotator cuff tear. Overall, the presence of an AGRF did not portend a worse prognosis as treatment strategies and long-term outcomes including recurrent instability, progression of osteoarthritis, and conversion to arthroplasty were similar to those in patients without AGRFs.Level III, retrospective comparative study.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with seizure disorders commonly suffer shoulder dislocations and subsequent instability. Due to high rates of recurrence and bone loss, management of this instability and associated pathology has proven to be more complex than that of patients without seizure disorders. The ultimate goal of this review is to outline the various treatment modalities and their respective outcomes in this complex patient population. RECENT FINDINGS: Optimization of medical management of seizure disorders is imperative. However, despite these efforts, the incidence of post-operative seizure activity continues to be a concern. These subsequent episodes increase the risk of further instability and failure of surgical procedures. Overall, the use of soft tissue procedures has proven to result in increased recurrence of instability compared to bone-block augmenting and grafting procedures. There are a variety of bone-block procedures that have been described for anterior and posterior instability. Despite their success in decreasing further instability, they are associated with several complications that patients should be informed of. SUMMARY: There is no consensus regarding the optimal surgical management of shoulder instability in patients with seizure activity. A multidisciplinary approach to the management of the seizure activity is paramount to the success of their treatment. Further studies are required to evaluate the optimal timing and type of surgical intervention for individualized cases.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Avascular necrosis (AVN) and posttraumatic arthritis (PTA) are common complications following both conservative treatment and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs). Despite the frequent utilization of ORIF, information regarding these leading causes of failure is limited. This review includes a discussion of incidence, risk factors, and evaluation of AVN and PTA following PHF. The mechanisms of treatment options and associated outcomes are also reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent best available evidence demonstrates significant rates of AVN and PTA following ORIF of PHF. This is particularly true of complex fracture patterns. A thorough workup is required in the setting of failure caused by AVN and PTA. This includes a careful patient history, clinical exam, plain film radiographs, and CT scans. EMG and/or aspiration may also be indicated. Special consideration is given to the examination of the deltoid muscle, neurovascular status, rotator cuff function, and the possibility of infection. Biological supplementation, anatomic total shoulder replacement (aTSA), and fusion are rarely employed in the treatment of AVN and/or PTA. Due to satisfactory patient outcomes, reverse total shoulder replacement (rTSA) has increased in popularity for the elderly population, while hemiarthroplasty (HA) may be appropriate for some young, active patients. SUMMARY: With careful patient selection and meticulous surgical technique, AVN and PTA can be mitigated. Careful indications for ORIF may decrease the frequency of these complications. For most patients, rTSA is the optimal treatment option. Given the frequent utilization of ORIF and the higher than acceptable complication and failure rates, AVN and PTA warrant our attention.

Endoprosthetic or allograft reconstruction are the preferred reconstruction techniques for proximal humeral bone tumors. Failure of these reconstructions may occur, but historically revision is performed rarely due to the lack of reliable options. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with an allograft prosthetic composite (rAPC) may provide a revision option. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate our institutional outcome of these procedures.Eleven (6 male, 5 female) patients (mean age 51 ± 17 years) underwent revision of a failed oncologic reconstruction of the proximal humerus utilizing a rAPC. The most common indication for revision was subluxation (n = 6) and the most common previous implant was an endoprosthesis (n = 5).Revision resulted in improvements in shoulder elevation (39° vs. 62°, p = 0.02), external rotation (13° vs. 25°, p = 0.04), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (39 vs. 58, p = 0.004) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Scores (51% vs 69%, p = 0.002). There were 2 re-revision procedures performed. One for an allograft fracture and one for allograft resorption and loosening.Revision with a rAPC can effectively restore patient function. Due to the complexity of the cases, we advocate for these procedures to be performed by subspecialty upper extremity surgeons trained in complex revision shoulder arthroplasty.

SUMMARY Intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus present challenges to treating physician and patient alike. The olecranon osteotomy is accepted as the standard exposure for intra-articular distal humerus fractures; nevertheless, complications such as nonunion and implant prominence are common. In this article, we describe the clinical outcomes and anatomic features of the triceps tenotomy as an alternative method of exposure for internal fixation of intra-articular distal humerus fractures. The olecranon osteotomy approach affords greater exposure of the distal humerus articular surface; however, there was no difference in quality of fracture reduction, progression to fracture union, posttraumatic arthrosis, or implant failure between approaches in our series. The osteotomy approach resulted in a greater need for reoperation (15% vs. 46%, respectively); largely as a result of olecranon implant-related complications. In summary, the triceps tenotomy offers an alternative exposure for intra-articular distal humerus fracture fixation with comparable clinical outcomes to the olecranon osteotomy technique.

Background Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic rheumatologic disease that occurs in the pediatric population. Often, JIA continues throughout life leading to progressive polyarticular arthritis and significant joint destruction and disability, oftentimes requiring replacement surgery. This study aimed to determine the outcomes of primary shoulder arthroplasty (SA) in patients with JIA. Methods Over a 42-year time period (1977 - 2019), 67 primary SA (20 hemiarthroplasty (HA), 38 anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), and 9 reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA)) with a prior diagnosis of JIA formally established in a multi-disciplinary rheumatologic clinic met inclusion criteria. Further assessment was performed with inclusion of the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, active shoulder range of motion (ROM), imaging studies, complications, and implant survivorship free from reoperation and revision. Results SA led to substantial improvements in pain and ROM across the entire cohort at an average follow-up period of 12.2 years (range, 2- 34 years). TSA was associated with the lowest pain scores (0.8; p = 0.02) and the highest ASES scores (77.4; p = 0.04) at most recent follow-up when compared to HA and RSA. There were 14 (21%) complications across the cohort with rotator cuff failure (n=4; 5.9%) as the most common complication followed by infection (n=3; 4.5%). Revision surgery was performed in 5 shoulders (7.5%), with five-year implant survival rates of 95.1% at five years, 93% at ten years, 89.4% at twenty years, and 79.5% at thirty years. At 30 years, TSA was associated with better survival (90.1%) when compared with HA (71.8%). Conclusions Primary shoulder arthroplasty in the form of HA, TSA, and RSA offers a reliable surgical option for JIA patients with respect to pain reduction and ROM improvements. Unique challenges still exist in this cohort, in particular younger patients with an elevated propensity for glenoid bone erosion and a complication rate of 20.9%. As such, HA may not be ideal in this patient population. However, despite rotator cuff and glenoid concerns, TSA seems to be associated with better pain relief and patient reported outcomes with the most durability in the long term when compared to HA. Level of evidence Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Treatment Study.

Background: Arthroscopic debridement for osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions of the capitellum is a relatively common and straightforward surgical option for failure of nonoperative management. However, the long-term outcomes of this procedure remain unknown. Hypothesis: Arthroscopic debridement of capitellar OCD would provide satisfactory long-term improvement in patient-reported outcomes. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients aged ≤18 years who underwent arthroscopic debridement procedures for OCD lesions (International Cartilage Repair Society grades 3 and 4) were identified. Procedures included loose body removal when needed and direct debridement of the lesion; marrow stimulation with drilling or microfracture was added at the discretion of each surgeon. The cohort consisted of 53 elbows. Patient evaluation included visual analog scale for pain; motion; subjective satisfaction; Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores; reoperation; and rate of return to sports. Results: At a mean 11 years of follow-up (range, 5-23 years), the median visual analog scale score for pain was 0, and 96% of patients reported being improved as compared with how they were before surgery. The mean ± SD QuickDASH score was 4 ± 9 points (range, 0-52 points), and 80% of patients returned to their sports of interest. The arc of motion significantly improved from 115°± 28° preoperatively to 130°± 17° at latest follow-up ( P = .026). Seven elbows (13%) required revision surgery for OCD lesions, resulting in high rates of overall survivorship free of revision surgery: 90% (95% CI, 80%-96%) at 5 years and 88% (95% CI, 76%-94%) at 10 years. At final follow-up, 7 all-cause reoperations were performed without revision surgery on the OCD lesion. Conclusion: Arthroscopic debridement of grade 3 or 4 OCD lesions of the capitellum produced satisfactory patient-reported outcomes in a majority of elbows, although a subset of patients experienced residual symptoms. The inherent selection bias of our cohort should be considered when applying these results to the overall population with OCD lesions, as we do not recommend this procedure for all patients.

Hypothesis Using a modern stem designed for use in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for fracture will enable accurate and effective tuberosity reduction and healing Methods Twenty-five (25) shoulders were included, with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. Radiographs and clinical outcome scores were reviewed. Results The average age of patients was 72. The average postoperative ASES score was 83 ± 8. Average SANE scores were 82 ± 15. Modified Neer scores were able to be calculated on 23 patients, with 21 patients (91%) having excellent (14) or satisfactory (7) outcomes. Tuberosity reduction was “anatomic” in all shoulders. There was one shoulder (4%) that had tuberosities that displaced into a “nonanatomic” position. Mild displacement of the tuberosities, and tuberosity resorption were common. No stems or glenoid components loosened or were considered “at risk.” Discussion With modern stem design emphasizing tuberosity reduction and fixation, and modern repair constructs, tuberosity reduction and healing are reliable. Clinical outcomes are excellent, with 91% having excellent or satisfactory clinical outcomes. Level of Evidence Level IV; Treatment Study

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Shoulder instability in the overhead athlete is a difficult problem because of the balance between necessary laxity for athletic movements and stability of the joint. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the clinical evaluation of shoulder instability in the overhead athlete and present evidence-based management strategies for each subtype of shoulder instability, including novel techniques and outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent investigation has shown that throwers and other overhead athletes are more likely to present with subtle subluxation events rather than discrete dislocations as their primary symptom. While overhead athletes with discrete anterior dislocation events are likely to begin with non-operative management, many progress on to surgical intervention. Surgical management of glenohumeral joint instability continues to pose challenges due to the potential for over-tensioning for the sake of stability at the expense of the adaptive laxity that often confers performance benefits in the overhead athlete. Novel, individualized, and sport/position specific approaches are needed to address this complex issue. SUMMARY: The optimal management of shoulder instability in the overhead athlete continues to be a controversial topic due to the complex work-up, an increasing number of surgical options with varying indications, and low volume of high-quality studies comparing any of the treatment options. The Anterior Shoulder Instability International Consensus Group guidelines from February 2022 offer the most updated guidelines on work-up and management. Overall, high-quality randomized controlled trials are required to determine the optimal treatment for specific pathologies and aid in creating patient-centered management plans.

Background: There is a dearth of knowledge on anterior shoulder instability in older patients. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purposes of this study were to describe the incidence and epidemiology, injury characteristics, and treatment and outcomes in patients ≥50 years old with first-time anterior shoulder instability. We also describe the historical trends in diagnosis and treatment. It was hypothesized that the rates of obtaining a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan and surgical intervention have increased over the past 20 years. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: An established geographic database was used to identify 179 patients older than 50 years who experienced new onset anterior shoulder instability between 1994 and 2016. Medical records were reviewed to obtain patient characteristics, imaging characteristics, and surgical treatment and outcomes, including recurrent instability. Comparative analysis was performed to identify differences between age groups. Mean follow-up time was 11 years. Results: The incidence of first-time anterior shoulder dislocation in our study population was 28.8 per 100,000 person-years, which is higher than previously reported. Full-thickness rotator cuff tears were found in 62% of the 66 patients who underwent MRI scans. Of all patients, 26% progressed to surgery at a mean time of 1.6 years after injury; 57% of all surgical procedures involved a rotator cuff repair, and 17% included anterior labral repair. All patients who underwent a labral repair also underwent concomitant rotator cuff repair. The rate of recurrent instability for the cohort was 15% at a median of 176 days after the initial instability event. There were no instances of recurrent instability after operative intervention. At an average of 7.5 years after the initial instability event, 14% of patients developed radiographic progression of glenohumeral arthritis. The rate of surgical intervention within 1 year of initial dislocation increased from 5.1% in 1994 to 1999 to 52% in 2015 to 2016. Conclusion: The incidence of first-time anterior shoulder instability in patients aged ≥50 years was 28.8 per 100,000 person-years. Full-thickness rotator cuff tears (62%) were the most common condition associated with anterior shoulder instability, followed by Hill-Sachs lesions (56%). The rate of recurrent instability for the entire cohort was 15%, with no instances of recurrent instability after operative intervention.

External beam radiation therapy (XRT) is a commonly used therapeutic modality for the treatment of various chest wall and axillary malignancies. Despite the known risk of local soft tissue dysfunction, and possibly compromised bone ingrowth for cementless implants, there remains limited data on the impact of prior XRT in a shoulder arthroplasty (SA) cohort. This study evaluated the outcomes of primary SA in patients with prior XRT compared to a matched cohort (MC).Over a 27-year time period (1993-2020), 80 primary SAs (7 hemiarthroplasties [HAs], 29 anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties [aTSAs], and 44 reverse shoulder arthroplasties [rTSAs]) with previous XRT to the upper chest or axillary region and a minimum of 2-year follow-up were included. This cohort was matched (1:2) according to age, sex, body mass index (BMI), implant, and year of surgery with patients who had undergone HA or TSA for osteoarthritis or RSA for cuff tear arthropathy. Clinical outcomes including pain, active shoulder range of motion (ROM), strength, complications, and reoperations inclusive of revision surgery were assessed.The XRT cohort consisted of 71 (88.8%) women with a mean age of 70.9 (range, 43-87) years, BMI of 30.9 ± 7.6, and follow-up period of 6.6 years (range, 2.0-28.2). In these patients, SA led to substantial improvements in pain, ROM, and strength across the entire cohort. When compared to the MC, the XRT group demonstrated a lower final postoperative forward elevation (FE) (111° vs. 126°; P = .013) and less improvements in pain (5.3 vs. 6.2; P = .002), FE (34° vs. 54°; P = .002), and external rotation (13° vs. 24°; P .001). There were 14 (17.5%) complications and 7 reoperations in the XRT group, with rotator cuff failure after HA or TSA (n = 4 of 36; 11.1%) as the most common complication and no instances of loose humeral components. The XRT group had a higher rate of complications (17.5% vs. 8.1%; P = .03) but not reoperations (8.8% vs. 3.1%; P = .059). When evaluated by implant, rTSA demonstrated the lowest rate of reoperations followed by aTSA and HA (2.3% vs. 10.3% vs. 42.9%; P = .002).Primary SA is an effective treatment modality for the improvement of pain, motion, and strength in patients with a history of prior XRT. However, when compared to patients without prior XRT, less clinical improvement and a higher rate of postoperative complications were observed.

INTRODUCTION The proximal humerus is a common location for primary and non-primary tumors. Reconstruction of the proximal humerus is commonly performed with an endoprosthesis with low rates of structural failure. The incidence and risk factors for stress shielding are under reported. METHODS Thirty-nine (19 male, 20 female) patients underwent resection of the proximal humerus and reconstruction with a cemented modular endoprosthesis between 2000 and 2018. The mean resection length was 12 ± 4 cm and was most commonly performed for metastatic disease (n = 26, 67%). RESULTS Stress shielding was observed in 9 (23%) patients at a mean of 29 (6-132) months postoperatively. Patients with stress shielding were noted to have shorter intramedullary stem length (87 vs. 107 mm, p

The objective of this study was to retrospectively review clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who underwent corrective osteotomies for clavicle malunion and internal fixation for nonunion using a combination of virtual surgical planning, patient-specific 3D printed clavicles, and 3D printed cutting guides manufactured at the point of care.Between 2015 and 2021, 18 patients underwent corrective osteotomy for a clavicle malunion (7 shoulders) or internal fixation for a clavicle nonunion (11 shoulders). There were 11 males and 7 females with an average patient age of 43.9 (range 19-76) years. All patients underwent computed tomography (CT) evaluation of both clavicles. The DICOM files were manually segmented, virtual surgical planning was performed selectively using commercially available software, and a mirrored version of the normal clavicle was 3D printed along with a 3D printed replica of the affected clavicle. 3D printed mirrored clavicles were used in all cases to ensure adequate restoration of the shape and length of the clavicle and to pre-contour fixation plates. Virtual surgical planning (VSP) and 3D printed cutting guides for osteotomy were used in 4/18 (22%) patients. Either cancellous or structural intercalary bone grafting was used in 15/18 (83%) cases. Patients were contacted postoperatively to determine clinical outcome scores. Preoperative, early postoperative, and late postoperative radiographs were reviewed to assess for union and complications. The average follow-up time was 24.9 months.Radiographic evaluation at most recent follow-up demonstrated adequate restoration of length and successful union for all shoulders. There were no complications or reoperations. Postoperative patient reported outcomes could be obtained in in 16/18 (88.9%) patients. At most recent follow-up, the mean VAS for pain was 2.38 points (range, 1 to 7), the mean shoulder ASES score was 73.2 points (range, 25 to 100), and the mean PROMIS Upper Extremity score was 26 points (range, 7 to 35). 100% of the patients were satisfied with their outcome (9 very satisfied, 7 satisfied), and their mean subjective shoulder value was 73% (range, 10% to 100%). However, two patients complained of hardware related symptoms, and one patient had return of preoperative symptoms after an interim two years of pain relief.The use of mirrored 3D printed clavicles combined with VSP and patient-specific 3D guides provides a reliable technique for restoring native anatomy when performing corrective osteotomies for clavicle malunion or internal fixation for clavicle nonunion, with a high rate of satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes.

To investigate the progression of rotator cuff tendon pathology across one year in manual wheelchair (MWC) users with spinal cord injury (SCI) and matched able-bodied individuals, and to explore the association between pain, age, and duration of wheelchair use with the progression of rotator cuff pathology.Longitudinal cohort study, 1-year follow-up.Outpatient clinic at a tertiary medical center.Twenty-four adult MWC users with SCI (20 men) with an average age (SD) of 37(12) years and 24 age and sex-matched able-bodied individuals.Not applicable.Presence of shoulder pain was collected. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities of rotator cuff tendons including tendinopathy and tendon tears at baseline and 1-year follow-up visits were graded by a board-certified musculoskeletal radiologist, and three categories of tendon pathology scores including individual tendon scores, unilateral cuff scores, and bilateral cuff scores were calculated for each participant.Fifty-four percent of the MWC users reported shoulder pain at both time points which was significantly higher than able-bodied cohort at baseline (17%, P = 0.012) and year 1 (21%, P = 0.021). Rotator cuff tendon pathology was detected as mainly mild tendinopathies and low-grade partial-thickness tears in both cohorts at both time points but was more common in MWC users. The results for the bilateral cuff scores indicated a significant (P 0.008) progression of rotator cuff tendon pathology in the MWC users over one year. MRI findings did not change significantly for the able-bodied cohort across time. There was no association of pain, age, or duration of MWC use with progression of rotator cuff pathology in MWC user cohort.MWC users had a higher prevalence of pain than matched able-bodied cohort, but pain was minimal and not function-limiting. Bilateral cuff TOTAL scores showed pathology progression in MWC users, but MRI findings remained stable in the able-bodied cohort. MWC users were 3.4 times more likely to experience pathology progression than the able-bodied cohort.

Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is an important tool in the acute treatment of comminuted radial head and neck fractures. RHA is also performed in a delayed manner after failed open reduction and internal fixation, for fracture malunion or nonunion, and other chronic post-traumatic elbow disorders where restoration of the lateral column of the elbow is considered necessary. The relative efficacy and longevity of acute vs. delayed RHA is unknown. We sought to compare clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes between these groups.We identified patients ≥18 years old who underwent an RHA between 2000 and 2018 and then extracted 135 total elbows with a mean follow-up of 2.3 years that sustained isolated radial head fractures (30%), terrible triad injuries (66%), or Essex-Lopresti injuries (4%). The acute cohort (RHA:12 weeks) contained 101 elbows that underwent surgery at a mean of 0.6 weeks (range, 0 days to 7 weeks, 96% 2 weeks) from injury, whereas the delayed cohort (RHA: 12 weeks to 2 years) contained 34 elbows that underwent surgery at a mean of 36 weeks (range, 14-82 weeks) from injury. Patients in the acute group had a higher percentage of terrible triad injuries (75% vs. 40%, P .001) and Mason 3 fractures (98% vs. 45%, P .001).At the final follow-up, 13 of 101 patients in the acute cohort (13%) and 7 of 34 patients in the delayed cohort (21%) required implant revision or resection. A total of 25 patients (25%) in the acute cohort and 12 patients (35%) in the delayed cohort required a reoperation. Kaplan-Meier 2-year survival estimates free of implant resection or revision (90% acute, 86% delayed) and reoperation (76% acute, 70% delayed) were similar between groups. In patients with 5-year follow-up, there was an increased rate of revision or resection in the delayed group (30% vs. 13%). Two-year survival estimates free of radiographic loosening were 80% in the acute cohort vs. 57% in the delayed cohort (P = .04). Mayo Elbow Performance Score at 2 years demonstrated mean scores of 83 and 79 in the acute and delayed groups, respectively, with 71% of the acute cohort and 64% of the delayed cohort achieving good or excellent scores.Our results demonstrated that although 2-year Kaplan-Meier survival free of revision or resection estimates and reoperation rates was equivalent between the groups, the delayed group experienced worse Mayo Elbow Performance Score outcomes, a higher revision or resection rate at 5 years, and an increased rate of radiographic loosening.

Objective: To investigate the prevalence of rotator cuff and long head of the biceps pathologies in manual wheelchair (MWC) users with spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: Cross-sectional study. Setti...

Background Pathologic fibrosis is characterized by dysregulation of gene expression with excessive extracellular matrix production. The genetic basis for solid organ fibrosis is well described in the literature. However, there is a paucity of evidence for similar processes in the musculoskeletal (MSK) system. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of existing evidence of genetic predisposition to pathologic fibrosis in the cardiac, pulmonary, and MSK systems, and to describe common genetic variants associated with these processes. Methods A comprehensive search of several databases from 2000 to 2019 was conducted using relevant keywords in the English language. Genes reported as involved in idiopathic fibrotic processes in the heart, lung, hand, shoulder, and knee were recorded by 2 independent authors. Results Among 2373 eligible studies, 52 studies investigated genetic predisposition in terms of variant analysis with the following organ system distribution: 36 pulmonary studies (69%), 15 hand studies (29%), and 1 knee study (2%). Twenty-two percent of gene variants identified were associated with both pulmonary and MSK fibrosis (ie, ADAM, HLA, CARD, EIF, TGF, WNT, and ZNF genes). Genetic variants known to be involved in the MSK tissue development or contractility properties in muscle were identified in the pulmonary fibrosis. Conclusion Despite shared genetic variations in both the lung and hand, there remains limited information about genetic variants associated with fibrosis in other MSK regions. This finding establishes the necessity of further studies to elucidate the genetic determinants involved in the knee, shoulder, and other joint fibrotic pathways. Level of evidence Level III.

Proximal humerus lesser tuberosity avulsions are uncommon injuries; however, when present, they can be debilitating for patients. As such, they pose a unique clinical challenge. These fractures were traditionally treated through an open approach to the proximal humerus; however, arthroscopic techniques continue to evolve and are increasingly used for these types of injuries. We describe our minimally invasive arthroscopic technique to repair lesser tuberosity avulsions using standard arthroscopic equipment. This method is safe, efficient, and applies basic shoulder arthroscopic techniques.

Background Locking plate technology has increased the frequency of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of proximal humerus fractures (PHF). A number of technical pearls have been recommended to lower the complication rate of ORIF. These pearls are particularly relevant for patients aged >60 years, when nonoperative treatment and arthroplasty are alternatives commonly considered. There have been few large, single-center studies on the modern application of this technology. Methods Between 2005 and 2015, a total of 173 PHFs in patients aged >60 years were treated at our institution with ORIF using locking plates. Failure was defined as reoperation or radiographic evidence of failure. Average follow-up was 6.1 years. Results There was an overall complication rate of 44%. The overall failure rate was 34% and correlated with fracture type: 26% failure rate in 2-part fractures (16 failures), 39% in 3-part fractures (23 failures), and 45% in 4-part fractures (11 failures). There was no difference between the failure rate with and without fibular allograft (33% vs. 34%). Most patients with radiographic or clinical failure did not undergo reoperation. The overall reoperation rate was 11% (14 patients). Seven percent of 2-part fractures (4 shoulders), 14% of 3-part fractures (8 shoulders), and 18% of 4-part fractures (2 shoulders) required reoperation. Conclusions ORIF of PHFs with locking plates in patients aged >60 years resulted in a 44% complication and 34% failure rate. There was a trend toward higher complication and failure rates in older patients and more complex fractures. Refinement in fixation techniques and indications are necessary to optimize the surgical management of PHFs.