Search

Category: Ankle Arthritis; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: The use of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) in the treatment of ankle arthritis has grown substantially as advancements are made in design and surgical technique. Among the criteria guiding the choice between arthroplasty versus arthrodesis, the long-term survival and postoperative outcomes are of crucial importance. First FDA approved in 2005, the INBONE I prosthesis was subsequently replaced by the INBONE II in 2010. While outcomes of the INBONE I have been published, there is limited long-term survivorship data for the INBONE II. The purpose of this study is to determine the minimum 5-year survivorship of the INBONE II prosthesis and causes of failure. In addition, we evaluate long-term radiographic and patient- reported outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively identified 46 prospectively followed patients from 2010 to 2015 who underwent TAA with the INBONE II prosthesis at our institution. Of these, 44 cases (41 patients) had minimum follow-up of 5 years (mean, 6; range, 5 to 9). Mean age was 65.6 years (range, 42 to 81) and mean BMI was 27.6 (range 20.1 to 33). Survivorship was determined by incidence of revision, defined as removal/exchange of a metal component. Chart review was performed to record incidences of revision and reoperation. Preoperative, immediate and minimum 5-year x-rays were reviewed; coronal tibiotalar alignment (TTA) was measured on standing AP radiographs to assess alignment of the prosthesis. A TTA of +-5° from 90° indicated neutral alignment, while 95° was considered varus and valgus alignment, respectively. Radiographic subsidence as well as presence and location of periprosthetic cysts were documented. Pre- and minimum 5-year FAOS domains were compared. Results: Survivorship was 97.7% with one revision of the talar component due to aseptic loosening and subsidence. The rate of other reoperations was 4.5% (2); one patient underwent medializing calcaneal osteotomy for valgus heel alignment, another patient underwent ostectomy and debridement for ankle impingement. Average preoperative TTA was 88.5 degrees with 15 neutral (average TTA of 89.7°), 14 varus (74°) and 12 valgus (104°) ankles. Average postoperative TTA was 88.6° with 35 neutral (89.3°), 6 varus (84.7°), and no valgus ankles. Radiographic subsidence was observed in one patient who underwent revision, and periprosthetic cysts were observed in 7 patients. There was significant improvement in all FAOS domains at final follow-up. Conclusion: This is the largest study to date dedicated to evaluating survivorship of the INBONE II prosthesis. Our data suggests a high survival rate and low reoperation rate with long-term follow-up of the INBONE II implant. We observed significant improvement in radiographic alignment as well as patient-reported clinical outcomes at minimum 5-year follow-up.

Category: Hindfoot; Other Introduction/Purpose: Due to the nature of the medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy (MDCO), bony step-off at the osteotomy site is inevitable and can lead to lateral prominence pain. Theoretically, this bony prominence can lead to irritation of the peroneal tendon, sural nerve, and overlying skin resulting in pain and discomfort. While these symptoms have been loosely described in the literature, the incidence and prevention are largely unexplored. The purpose of this study is to investigate the incidence of lateral prominence pain after MDCO as well as the efficacy of a leveling procedure (LP) as a preventive technique. Methods: We retrospectively identified 175 feet in 160 patients who underwent MDCO from 2016 to 2018. Of the 175 feet, 102 underwent MDCO with LP, and 73 without LP. LP was performed after calcaneal fixation by flattening the residual bony prominence using rongeur and bone impactor (Figure 1). Lateral prominence symptoms were defined as pain present at 12 month follow-up after MDCO, either 1) over the lateral prominence on direct contact with the floor or footwear, or 2) associated with callus formation over the osteotomy site due to continued irritation. The overall incidence of lateral prominence symptoms after MDCO and the incidence with or without LP were investigated. The relationship between the amount of calcaneal displacement and the occurrence of lateral prominence pain with or without LP was also analyzed. Results: The overall incidence of lateral prominence was 12.6% (22 of 175): 4.9% (5 of 102) in patients who underwent LP and 23.3% (17 of 73) in patients who did not undergo LP (p

Category: Ankle; Ankle Arthritis; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Although total ankle replacement (TAR) for the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis has been shown to have excellent radiographic and clinical outcomes, there is a risk for complications such as periprosthetic fractures. While periprosthetic fractures of the tibia are well described in the literature, little is known about such fractures involving the talus. The purpose of this case series is to describe the radiographic findings and surgical management of talar fractures sustained after placement of total ankle prostheses. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 489 patients who underwent total ankle replacement from June 2015 to March 2019, and identified five cases (2 males, 3 females, average age 45.7 years) in which patients sustained a periprosthetic fracture of the talus. All patients presented symptomatically with ankle pain during postoperative follow-up, and fractures of the talus were confirmed on computed tomography (CT) imaging. One patient had psoriatic arthritis and four patients had primary osteoarthritis of the ankle. CTs were reviewed to confirm location and pattern of the fracture, as well as related pathology such as osteolysis and subsidence. Hospital charts and operative reports were reviewed to record patient demographics and postoperative management including reoperations. Results: Overall the incidence of talar fractures was 1% (5/489) and all occurred in implants with a talar stem (4 INBONE II, 1 Salto Talaris). All fractures extended from the stem of the talar component into the subtalar joint, with one case of a non- displaced fracture. Osteolysis surrounding the talar stem was observed in all cases, with subsidence of the talar component observed in four out of five patients on CT. All five patients presented symptomatically and underwent reoperation (1 revision of talar component with ORIF, 3 subtalar fusions, 1 tibiotalar fusion). Conclusion: The findings in this case series suggest that periprosthetic fractures of the talus following total ankle replacement is a possible complication of stemmed implants and is associated with poor clinical outcomes requiring reoperation. Therefore, a periprosthetic fracture of the talus should be considered in a patient with unexplained pain and evidence of radiographic osteolysis around the stemmed component.

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Other Introduction/Purpose: Coalition of the naviculo-medial cuneiform joint (NCJ) is a relatively rare condition among the tarsal bone coalitions. Thus, optimal treatment is still largely unknown. There is a paucity of literature, with few cases documenting arthrodesis of the NCJ in adults with varied outcomes. As the NCJ contributes to the majority of motion along the medial column of the foot, arthrodesis of the joint may cause excessive stress on adjacent joints. Furthermore, the nonunion rate of NCJ is reportedly high, ranging from 3 to 15%. The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of simple coalition bar excision in patients with NCJ coalition. Additionally, we investigated preoperative abnormal conditions around the NCJ using weight bearing computed tomography (WBCT). Methods: We retrospectively identified 21 feet in 18 prospectively followed patients from 2010 to 2018 who underwent simple coalition bar excision of NCJ in our institution. Chart review was performed to retrieve demographic data of the patients, clinical presentation findings, and concomitant procedures with coalition bar excision. Radiographically, the location and morphological pattern of the coalition were analyzed. Several angular parameters including medial arch sag angle (MASA) were measured on weightbearing x-rays to see if there are any angular collapse at NCJ after coalition bar excision (Figure 1). The existence of abnormal conditions adjacent to the NCJ such as arthritis of the first and second tarsometatarsal joint (TMTJ) and talonavicular joint (TNJ) were assessed using WBCT (n=17). Clinically, pre- and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) and foot function index (FFI) were compared to assess for improvement in patient-reported outcomes. Results: The mean age of the patients was 30.9 years (range, 16-62) and the follow-up was 15.9 months (range, 12-24). Majority of the patient had fibrous coalition at the plantar-medial aspect and only one patient had bony coalition. The morphology of fibrous coalition was classified as irregular (n=8), cystic (n=1), and combined (n=11) based on CT findings. Intraoperatively, the motion of the NCJ was identified in every patient after coalition bar excision. WBCT revealed 15 feet (71.4%) having at least one abnormal finding around the NCJ (First TMTJ plantar gap; n=10, second TMTJ narrowing; n=9, first TMTJ spur & irregularity; n=2, TNJ spur; n=1). Pre- and postoperative MASA did not change significantly (p=0.932). There was significant improvement in VAS and FFI at final follow-up (p

Category: Other Introduction/Purpose: Fulfillment of patients’ expectations following foot and ankle surgery has been previously studied and validated in assessing patient-reported outcomes (PROs). While this assessment has been shown to correlate well with patient satisfaction and PROs, the impact of postoperative complications on fulfillment of expectations is unknown. The aim of this study is to therefore investigate the impact of postoperative complications on fulfillment of patients’ expectations. Methods: Preoperatively, patients completed a validated Foot and Ankle expectations survey consisting of 23 questions encompassing domains including pain, ambulation, daily function, exercise, and shoe wear. At 2 years postoperatively, patients answered how much improvement they received for each item cited preoperatively. A fulfillment proportion (FP) was calculated as the amount of improvement received versus the amount of improvement expected. The FP ranges from 0 (no expectations fulfilled), between 0 and 1 (expectations partially fulfilled), 1 (expectations met), to greater than 1 (expectations surpassed). In addition, patient-reported outcomes (FAOS), satisfaction, and Delighted-Terrible scale (how they would feel if asked to spend the rest of their life with their current foot/ankle symptom) were collected at final follow-up. Chart review was performed to identify patient demographics, comorbidities, pain management, and postoperative complications, which were classified as minor (infection requiring antibiotics) or major (unplanned return to OR, reoperation, or revision). Results: Of the 271 patients (mean age 55.4 years, 65% female), 31 (11.4%, mean age 53.6, 58% female) had a postoperative complication; 27 major (17 revisions, 10 removal of hardware due to pain/infection) and 6 minor (6 superficial infections requiring antibiotics). Complications were associated with significantly worse FP (0.69 +- 0.45 vs 0.86 +- 0.40, p=0.02). Average time from complication to completion of fulfillment survey was 15 (+-3.6) months. Having a complication significantly correlated with worse satisfaction, Delighted-Terrible scale, and FP (p

Category: Hindfoot; Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Surgical correction of the collapsing flatfoot deformity has been well studied in the literature, with the average patient being a female in her 50s. While reconstruction of the flexible, symptomatic flatfoot in children and adolescents has been described, assessment of outcomes across age groups is limited. Therefore, the purpose of our study is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes in younger patients 30 years or less undergoing flatfoot reconstruction with that of older patients. In addition, the procedures performed for reconstruction and the incidence of subsequent reoperations were compared between the two groups. Methods: Ninety-four feet (51 left, 43 right) in 87 patients who underwent reconstruction for flexible collapsing flatfoot deformity were divided into 2 groups based on age: 30 years (n=72). Exclusion criteria included tarsal coalition or neuromuscular disease. Average age and BMI was 20.8 years (range, 13 to 30) and 26.8 (range, 18 to 38) in the younger cohort, and 57.5 years (range, 35 to 81) and 29.8 (range, 18 to 46) in the older cohort. Preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative PROMIS scores were compared. Average follow-up was 30.6 and 27 months in the younger and older cohorts, respectively. We assessed five radiographic parameters both preoperatively and postoperatively, including talonavicular (TN) coverage angle, lateral talo-first metatarsal angle (Meary’s), lateral talocalcaneal angle, calcaneal pitch, and hindfoot moment arm (HMA). Operative reports and hospital records were reviewed to compare procedures performed for reconstruction as well as subsequent reoperations. Results: Younger patients demonstrated significant preoperative to postoperative improvements in Physical Function (p=0.01), Pain Interference (p

Category: Ankle Arthritis; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has garnered significant interest and increased use over the past decade, with advancements made in both design and surgical technique. The main advantage of TAA for the surgical treatment of ankle arthritis is to preserve range of motion compared to ankle arthrodesis. Among the criteria guiding the choice between arthroplasty and arthrodesis, the long-term survival and postoperative outcomes are of crucial importance. The Salto Talaris is a fixed-bearing implant first approved in the US in 2006, and long-term survivorship data is limited. The purpose of this study is to determine minimum 5-year survivorship of the Salto Talaris prosthesis and causes of failure. In addition, we evaluate long-term radiographic and patient-reported outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively identified 86 prospectively followed patients from 2007 to 2014 who underwent TAA with the Salto Talaris prosthesis at our institution. Of these, 81 patients (84 feet) had a minimum follow-up of 5 years (mean, 7.1; range, 5 to 12). Mean age was 63.5 years (range, 42 to 82) and mean BMI was 28.1 (range, 17.9 to 41.2). Survivorship was determined by incidence of revision, defined as removal/exchange of a metal component. Chart review was performed to record incidences of revision and reoperation. Preoperative, immediate and minimum 5-year postoperative x-rays were reviewed; coronal tibiotalar alignment (TTA) was measured on standing AP radiographs to assess alignment of the prosthesis. A TTA of +-5° from 90° indicated neutral alignment, while 95° was considered varus and valgus alignment, respectively. Radiographic subsidence as well as presence and location of periprosthetic cysts were documented. Pre- and minimum 5-year FAOS domains were compared. Results: Survivorship was 97.6% with two revisions. One patient underwent tibial and talar component revision for varus malalignment of the ankle, another underwent talar component revision for aseptic loosening and subsidence. The rate of other reoperations was 19.5% (18) with the main reoperation being exostectomy with debridement for ankle impingement (12). Average preoperative TTA was 88.8° with 48 neutral (average TTA of 90.1°), 18 varus (82.3°) and 8 valgus (99.6°) ankles. Average postoperative TTA was 89.0° with 69 neutral (89.7°), 6 varus (83°), and 1 valgus ankle (99.3°). Radiographic subsidence was observed in one patient who underwent revision, and periprosthetic cysts were observed in 18 patients. There was significant improvement in all FAOS domains at final follow-up. Conclusion: This is the largest study to date dedicated to evaluating survivorship of the Salto Talaris prosthesis. Our data reflects a high survival rate and moderate reoperation rate with long-term follow-up of the Salto Talaris implant. We observed significant improvement in radiographic alignment as well as patient-reported clinical outcomes at minimum 5-year follow-up.

Category: Bunion; Other Introduction/Purpose: Cone Beam Weight Bearing CT (WBCT) is gaining traction, particularly in the foot and ankle, due to the ability to perform natural stance weight bearing 3D scans. However, the resulting wealth of 3D data renders daily clinical use time consuming. Therefore, reliable automatic measurements are indispensable in order to make best use of the technology. The aim of this study was to evaluate a beta-version WBCT artificial intelligence (AI) automatic measurement system for the M1-M2 intermetatarsal angle (IMA), which is applicable in the absence of metallic hardware in the foot and ankle. We hypothesized that automatic measurements would correlate well with human measurements, and that software reproducibility would be better and close to perfect compared to manual measurements. Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, 90 feet were included from patients who underwent WBCT scans during routine follow up: 44 feet (90.9% female, mean age 54 years) with symptomatic hallux valgus (HV), 46 controls (76.1% female, mean age 49 years). Patients were excluded if they had history of surgery or trauma involving the first or second metatarsals, hallux rigidus, or presence of metal in their foot/ankle. IMA was measured manually on Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs (DRR IMA) and automatically with AI software producing auto 2D (ground plane projection) and 3D (multiplanar) measurements. Each IMA DRR was measured by two independent raters twice to calculate intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). To assess intra- software reliability, AI software measurements were made twice on each dataset. Manual and automatic measurements were compared between HV and control groups. Failures of the AI software to produce a measurement were recorded. Results: Mean values for controls were 8.6° +-1.8° (range, 5°-14°) for the manually measured DRR IMA, 9.3° +-2.8° (range, 3°- 17°) for auto 2D, and 9.2° +-2.6° (range, 3°-16°) for auto 3D IMA measurements. Compared to controls, HV patients demonstrated significantly increased IMA (p

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Other Introduction/Purpose: Severe adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) is often associated with painful medial column collapse at the naviculocuneiform (NC) joint. The purpose of this study was to examine the role of first tarsometatarsal (1st TMT) fusion combined with subtalar fusion in correcting deformity at this joint. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 40 patients (41 feet) who underwent 1st TMT and subtalar (ST) fusion as part of a flatfoot reconstructive procedure. We assessed six radiographic parameters both preoperatively and at a minimum of 6 months postoperatively, including talonavicular (TN) coverage angle, lateral talo-first metatarsal angle, lateral talocalcaneal angle, calcaneal pitch, hindfoot moment arm, and a newly defined navicular-cuneiform incongruency angle (NCIA). Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at a minimum 1 year follow-up. Results: The NCIA demonstrated excellent interobserver reliability, with no significant change between pre- and postoperative measurements. All other radiographic parameters, except calcaneal pitch, demonstrated statistically significant improvement postoperatively (p

Category: Ankle; Ankle Arthritis; Arthroscopy; Basic Sciences/Biologics; Bunion; Diabetes; Hindfoot; Lesser Toes; Midfoot/Forefoot; Sports; Trauma; Other Introduction/Purpose: This study aims to compare a novel opioid prescribing protocol aimed at reducing the number of opioid pills prescribed and consumed with an established, previously published protocol for foot and ankle surgery. We hypothesized that patients in the novel group would consume fewer opioids and report similar satisfaction with pain management compared with the established group. Methods: This study is a single center prospective study of 59 patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery who received a novel opioid prescribing protocol used by the senior author. Preoperatively, patients were counseled on the expectations of pain after surgery, received a take home pamphlet, and were prescribed opioids based on a sliding scale of procedures designated as minor (0-5 pills), moderate (5-10 pills) or major (15-20 pills). These patients were then compared to 84 patients from a previous prospective study from the same institution who received an opioid prescribing protocol with a maximum of 40-60 opioid pills. Patients were excluded if they used opioids or muscle relaxants preoperatively or had a known history of a substance use disorder. Patients completed surveys postoperatively for eight weeks reporting pain level, number of opioid pills consumed, refill requests, and satisfaction with their pain management plan. Results: There was a significant difference (p< 0.001) in mean pills consumed between the novel and established prescribing protocols at all time points (Table 1). During the entire postoperative period patients in the novel group had taken 21% of their prescribed pills compared to 40% in the established group (p=0.03). Patients had comparable levels of pain throughout the study (p>0.05 at POD 3, POD 7 and POD 14) and only differed significantly at POD 56 (p=0.005). Patients in the novel group did not request any refills, whereas patients in the established group requested a total of 9 refills over the course of the study. Conclusion: Patients receiving fewer opioid medications, along with preoperative coaching and take home materials, achieved equivalent analgesic effect when compared to patients receiving approximately double the amount of opioids. This study demonstrates that a sliding scale protocol with a maximum prescription of 20 opioid pills provides appropriate pain relief for most patients. This study confirms that patients on average take far fewer opioid pills than prescribed, and likely an even more limited prescribing protocol would be adequate for the majority of patients. This novel prescribing protocol ensures less opioids are both consumed and leftover for potential diversion in the community.

Category: Bunion; Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Lapidus procedure and Scarf osteotomy are indicated for treatment of mild to moderate hallux valgus. Advantages of modified Lapidus procedure include ability to address severe deformity, first tarsometatarsal arthritis, and first ray hypermobility. Advantages of Scarf osteotomy include greater correction of the distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA) and greater fixation stability than other techniques. Both procedures have shown good radiographic and clinical outcomes; however, no prior studies have compared these outcomes between the procedures. The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients with hallux valgus treated with the modified Lapidus procedure or Scarf osteotomy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients treated by one of seven fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeons were identified. Inclusion criteria were age greater than 18 years, primary modified Lapidus procedure or Scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus, minimum 1-year postoperative PROMIS scores, and minimum 3-month postoperative radiographs. Revision cases were excluded. Clinical outcomes were assessed using six PROMIS domains: Pain Interference, Pain Intensity, Physical Function, Global Mental Health, Global Physical Health, and Depression. Pre- and postoperative radiographic parameters were measured on AP (HVA, IMA, DMAA, tibial sesamoid position), and lateral (talo-1st-metatarsal angle (Meary’s), Horton index, Seiberg index, sagittal IMA) x-rays. Statistical analysis utilized targeted maximum likelihood estimation controls for confounding of bunion severity by including covariates for baseline HVA and IMA. Statistics were also analyzed in a restricted cohort of mild to moderate severity bunions (HVA

Category: Other Introduction/Purpose: Cases of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus (COVID-19) first emerged in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. Since then, the virus has spread globally at a rapid pace. The first case in New York City was reported on March 1, 2020, and the World Health Organization (WHO) declared a pandemic on March 11, 2020. New York City rapidly became the epicenter of the pandemic, with hospitals across the city making a number of changes to accommodate the influx of COVID-19 patients. Here, we describe our experience in adapting to the COVID-19 pandemic as a department consisting of 10 foot and ankle fellowship-trained surgeons with up to 28 years of individual experience in an academic orthopedic hospital. Methods: Information was obtained from direct interviews with surgeons in the Foot and Ankle Service and from our institution’s intranet. Additional information was obtained by viewing twice-weekly livestreams from March 27th, 2020 to May 1st, 2020 held by the Surgeon-In-Chief, which detailed hospital-wide policies and initiatives being implemented in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: On March 17, 2020, all elective surgeries were suspended at our institution, and a list of essential procedures was established. In-person clinical visits were limited to new patients being evaluated for essential procedures and first postoperative visits for returning patients, with all patients receiving pre-visit and on-site screening for COVID-19. All other new patient and follow-up appointments were conducted via telehealth visits. Much of our main hospital was repurposed to accept transfers of both COVID-negative and COVID-positive patients. A postanesthesia care unit and a floor of 9 operating rooms were repurposed as negative-pressure rooms for the care of critical COVID-positive patients on ventilators. An Orthopedic Triage Center (OTC) was established to relieve the patient load in the emergency departments of other hospitals in the city. Conclusion: By changing the way we delivered foot and ankle care and repurposing the roles of our employees and our institution, we have adapted strategies to continue delivering care to our patients. As we transition toward a ‘new normal,’ our goals are to gradually progress toward normal operations while keeping our patients and employees safe. With these gradual steps, we hope to emerge from this pandemic stronger and ready to adapt to the ever-changing needs of our community.

Category: Hindfoot; Other Introduction/Purpose: Medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy (MDCO) is a commonly performed procedure in flatfoot reconstruction. Fixation is often achieved with screws due to its ability to compress across the osteotomy site. Screws are placed via a free-handed technique without direct fluoroscopic visualization, due to difficulty attaining a simultaneous axial calcaneal view. In addition, the posterior calcaneal tuber translates medially after displacement, resulting in altered anatomical geometry. It is therefore important to establish a reliable external bony landmark when performing free-handed interfragmentary fixation in order to avoid potential screw-related complications and to provide better surgical technique and fixation. The purposes of this study are to validate a new external bony landmark and to establish the appropriate trajectory and screw length for free-hand screw fixation in MDCO. Methods: A total of 84 postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans of MDCO in 70 patients were analyzed. The images were reconstructed using a 3-dimensional simulation program (Vworks 4.0, Cybermed). Virtual screw insertion was simulated by aiming towards two bony landmarks: the base of the 5th metatarsal in the axial plane, and the sinus tarsi in the sagittal plane (Figure 1). A grading system was also utilized to classify scenarios in which the screw breached the distal cortical wall: Grade 1 was defined as contact between the virtual screw and the cortex, Grade 2 as the screw approaching the outer margin of the cortex, and Grade 3 as the screw penetrating the outer cortex. The trajectory angle between the screw and the osteotomy, as well as the screw size, were also measured. Results: The average age of patients was 24.5 (range, 19 to 53), and 100% were males. The average displacement of the posterior calcaneal fragment was 7.3+-1.5 mm (range, 3.9 to 13.8). Among the 84 virtual screws, only five (6.0%) breached the medial cortical wall of the osteotomized calcaneus. All medial breaches were Grade 1. None of the virtual screws breached the lateral cortical wall. Mean trajectory angle between the virtual screw and the osteotomy site was 74.9+-6.7˚ (range, 60.0 to 89.8˚). In the perioperative data, estimated maximum screw length by simulation was 55.6+-4.4 mm (range, 50 to 65). Conclusion: Our results suggest that the optimal trajectory of free-handed screw placement can be determined through simulation of calcaneal interfragmentary screw insertion using postoperative CT imaging. Using this simulation technology, we determined a trajectory towards the sinus tarsi on the sagittal plane and the base of the 5th metatarsal on the axial plane to be a reliable external bony landmark for placement of screws in MDCO. These promising results have potential implications in achieving better fixation as well as improving union rates and operative outcomes.

Category: Ankle; Hindfoot; Other Introduction/Purpose: Adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) is a complex deformity. Previous work has demonstrated correlation between postoperative foot alignment and patient-reported outcomes. While this work has provided essential targets for surgeons performing flatfoot reconstruction, there is an absence of data that would enable surgeons to predict which patients are likely to have greater or less improvement after surgery based on their preoperative deformity. Conventional radiographs alone may not provide enough detail to isolate individual elements of the deformity. Weightbearing CT (WBCT) allows for far more precise analysis in this regard. We hypothesized that there would be a set of parameters defining preoperative alignment on WBCT that would predict which patients are at risk for a lower magnitude of postoperative improvement in patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Methods: In this retrospective IRB-approved study, patients that underwent surgical flatfoot reconstruction after having a preoperative standing WBCT were identified. Preoperative WBCT images were evaluated by two independent/blinded observers. Multiple parameters related to preoperative alignment and AAFD severity were measured in the sagittal, coronal and transverse planes. Parameters measured included talus-first metatarsal angle; distances between the floor and the navicular, medial cuneiform and cuboid; subtalar joint horizontal angle; superior talar - inferior talar angle; subtalar joint subluxation; talonavicular uncoverage angle; hindfoot moment arm (HMA); and foot and ankle offset (FAO). Prospectively collected data regarding preoperative and postoperative PROs was evaluated. Six PROs components were assessed: physical function; pain interference, pain intensity, global mental health, global physical health and depression. Multivariate regression analysis and a partition prediction model were used to assess the correlation between preoperative alignment and improvement in PROs. P-values of less than 0.05 were considered significant. Results: A total of 51 patients with a preoperative WBCT and postoperative PROs scores were identified and included. Demographic data is shown in Table 1. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that preoperative alignment significantly correlated with improvement in three out six components of PROs: pain interference, pain intensity and global mental health. The strongest predictor of improvement in PROMIS physical function t-score was medial cuneiform to floor distance, for pain interference t-score: cuboid to floor distance, for pain intensity: subtalar joint subluxation, for depression t-score: superior talar - inferior talar angle, and for global physical and mental health t-scores: sagittal talus-first metatarsal angle. Conclusion: Our analysis yielded readily identifiable cutoffs for WBCT measurements, where values above or below were correlated with significant differences in the magnitude of PRO score change. Interestingly, measures of sagittal plane collapse and hindfoot valgus were the most predictive of score changes. This data provides useful information for surgeons counseling patients prior to flatfoot reconstruction. Future work using this data to develop prediction models for postoperative outcomes would be valuable, as would studies using WBCT to evaluate the relationship between postoperative corrected alignment and PROs. Complete results are shown in the attached Table.

Category: Hindfoot; Ankle; Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Multiple surgical techniques are used in the correction of Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity (AAFD). Assessment of the efficacy of a surgical treatment in the correction of the deformity is usually performed by clinical evaluation and conventional radiographic imaging. Weightbearing CT (WBCT) allows a more reliable and multiplanar evaluation of AAFD. The Foot and Ankle Offset (FAO) is a WBCT biometric semi-automatic measurement that gauges the relative positioning between the foot tripod and the center of the ankle joint. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of surgical treatment in correcting AAFD, comparing preoperative and postoperative FAO measurements. We hypothesized that surgical treatment would provide significant correction of the deformity, centering the tripod of the foot underneath the ankle joint. Methods: In this prospective comparative study, 21 adult patients (22 feet) with flexible AAFD were included, mean age 55 (range, 23-81) years, 13 females and eight males. Patients underwent preoperative and postoperative standing WBCT examination. Three-dimensional coordinates (X, Y and Z planes) of the foot tripod (weightbearing point of the first and fifth metatarsals and calcaneal tuberosity) and center of the ankle (apex of the talar dome) were harvested by two independent and blinded observers. The FAO was automatically calculated from the harvested 3D coordinates by dedicated software. Data regarding the surgical technique used was recorded. Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) were collected preoperatively and postoperatively at a mean follow-up of 22 (range, 8-36) months. Pre and postoperative FAO measurements were compared by paired T-tests. Multivariate analysis was used to assess the influence of surgical procedures in the amount of FAO correction. P-values of less than 0.05 were considered significant. Results: We found excellent intra (0.98) and interobserver reliability (0.96) for FAO measurements. The mean preoperative FAO was 10.4 (95% CI, 8.5 to 12.1). There was a significant correction of the deformity postoperatively (p

Category: Lesser Toes; Other Introduction/Purpose: Lesser toe metatarsal phalangeal (MTP) joint pathology presents a challenge for surgical treatment. Recently, synthetic cartilage implants have been shown to be safe and efficacious in treating hallux ridigus, offering pain relief while preserving motion at the MTP joint. At our institution, metatarsophalangeal joint arthroplasty using a polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) hydrogel implant has been utilized in the 2nd and 3rd MTP joints for advanced arthritis, failed management of Freiberg’s infraction, and osteochondral defects. We present a case series describing the clinical outcomes of 12 patients following PVA implantation of the 2nd or 3rd MTP. Methods: We retrospectively identified 12 consecutive patients (13 joints) who underwent PVA hydrogel implantation of the 2nd (n=12) or 3rd (n=1) metatarsal head between 2017 and 2019. PVA implant was indicated for advanced arthritis in 6 patients (7 joints), Freiberg’s infraction in 4 patients, and osteochondral defect in 2 patients. Average age was 51 years (range, 20-67), with 100% females. Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) scores were collected preoperatively and at latest follow-up, with an average follow-up of 20.4 months (range, 8.3 to 29.2). Retrospective chart review was performed to evaluate postoperative complications, including need for revision, implant removal, and persistent pain. Results: Overall, patients demonstrated mean improvement in all PROMIS domains, with a significant improvement in Pain Intensity of 11.9 points (p=0.03) postoperatively. A total of 4 postoperative complications occurred in the 12 patients: one case of AVN at 2 years postoperatively, one revision with removal of the implant and bone grafting of the second metatarsal head at 1 year postoperatively, one periprosthetic fracture at 9 months postoperatively, and one recurrence of pain requiring ultrasound- guided injection at 7 months postoperatively. Three additional patients reported persistent pain postoperatively. Conclusion: This study represents the largest case series to date evaluating the use of PVA hydrogel implant in the surgical correction of lesser toe MTP joint pathology. While the PVA implant presents a viable option in the setting of advanced arthritis, Freiberg’s infraction, and certain osteochondral defects, it is not without complications. The specific indications for use of the PVA implant should be carefully considered before implantation.

Category: Hindfoot; Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: The accessory navicular is often considered to be related to flatfoot deformity. While the Kidner procedure is commonly utilized in treating painful accessory navicular, its ability to correct flatfoot deformity is debated. Patients may also have recurrent pain due to increased tension of the posterior tibial tendon (PTT) in the setting of an uncorrected flatfoot. In the literature, both PTT lengthening and tendon transfer are techniques described to address this issue with varying success and outcomes. Because medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy (MDCO) is a powerful procedure capable of reducing tension of the medial column and correcting hindfoot valgus deformity, we investigated its use in addressing these symptoms. We report outcomes of a novel use of MDCO in treating patients with recurrent pain following Kidner procedure. Methods: We retrospectively identified 21 patients who underwent MDCO for recurrent pain after Kidner procedure at our institution. MDCO was indicated when patients failed to perform single heel raise due to pain at the PTT attachment site at minimum 6 months following index surgery. Pre- and postoperative radiographic parameters were measured: lateral talo-1st metatarsal angle (Meary’s), talonavicular coverage angle (TNC), calcaneal pitch (CP), and hindfoot moment arm (HMA). Using previously validated cut-offs in describing flatfoot deformity, a Meary’s angle less than -4 degrees was considered a flattened arch, and a HMA more than 3.2mm was considered a valgus heel deformity. Measurements were also performed in x-rays of the contralateral foot to determine whether foot deformity in the involved foot was attributed to Kidner procedure or a preexisting deformity. Pre- and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) and FAOS outcome scores were compared to assess for improvement in patient-reported outcomes. Results: The mean age was 25.7 years (range, 21-49) and the mean follow-up was 20.1 months (range, 14-26). The average time from the index surgery was 7.3 months (range, 6-10). Average size of the accessory navicular before excision was 11 mm (range, 4.6-18.3). Concomitant procedures included medial head gastrocnemius recession (n=11), plantarflexion osteotomy of first metatarsal bone (n=1), and talocalcaneal coalition excision (n=1). Radiographically, 12 patients (57%) had a flattened arch and all patients (100%) had heel valgus deformity. All radiographic parameters except Meary’s angle (p=0.885) improved postoperatively. Contralateral radiographs revealed that fifteen patients (71%) had a flattened arch, and 19 patients (90%) had heel valgus deformity. There were no differences between both sides. VAS and FAOS improved significantly (p

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Other Introduction/Purpose: In 2016, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of a polvinvyl alcohol (PVA) hydrogel implant (Cartiva, Elmsford, NY) for surgical treatment of hallux rigidus, or degenerative arthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal (1st MTP) joint. While studies have demonstrated the safety and usability of PVA implant, clinical outcomes following hemiarthroplasty with the PVA have not yet been compared to that of traditional joint-preserving procedures such as cheilectomy with Moberg osteotomy in the treatment of hallux rigidus. The purpose of this study is to compare patient-reported outcomes and postoperative complications between PVA hemiarthroplasty and cheilectomy with Moberg osteotomy, with the hypothesis that the addition of PVA would result in superior clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients were retrospectively identified who underwent hallux rigidus correction by one of seven Foot and Ankle fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons between March 2016 and November 2018. Out of 162 patients, a total of 133 patients constituted our study cohort after excluding patients with insufficient follow-up. Of the 133, 60 patients (mean age 57.2 years) were treated with combination PVA, cheilectomy, and Moberg osteotomy (PCM) and 73 patients (mean age 54.1) were treated with cheilectomy and Moberg (CM) alone. Both preoperative as well as minimum 1-year postoperative patient-reported outcome scores (PROMIS) were compared between the two cohorts. Chart review was performed to compare rates of revision and complications. Results: Average time to follow-up was 14.5 months for PCM and 15.6 for CM groups. Both PCM and CM cohorts demonstrated significant improvement in PROMIS scores, with the CM group demonstrating significantly greater increase in Physical Function (7.14 +- 8.48 vs 3.58 +- 6.24, p=0.01). While preoperative scores were comparable, postoperatively the CM group had a significantly higher average Physical Function (51.8 +- 8.7 vs 48.8 +- 8.0, p=0.04) and lower Pain Intensity (39.9 +- 8.3 vs 43.4 +- 8.7, p=0.02). There were 2 cases of revision with re-implantation and 1 case of conversion to arthrodesis in the PCM group. There was 1 case of conversion to PVA in the CM group. Three patients who underwent PCM had a documented postoperative infection requiring antibiotics. Conclusion: Our data suggests that the addition of polyvinyl alcohol implant in the treatment of hallux rigidus results in significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes. However, patient-reported physical function may not be up to par at minimum 1-year follow-up compared to cheilectomy and Moberg osteotomy alone. In addition, while incidence was low in our cohort, revision of the implant as well as conversion to arthrodesis remain possible complications of PVA. Therefore, we believe that proper patient selection is recommended when considering surgical treatment options for hallux rigidus.

Background: Active participation in patients’ own care is essential for success after Lapidus procedure. Poor health literacy, comprehension, and retention of patient instructions may be correlated with patient participation. Currently, there is no objective measure of how well patients internalize and retain instructions before and after a Lapidus procedure. We performed this study to assess how much of the information given to patients preoperatively was able to be recalled at the first postoperative visit. Methods: All patients between ages 18 and 88 years undergoing a Lapidus procedure for hallux valgus by the senior author between June 2016 and July 2018 were considered eligible for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they had a history of previous bunion surgery or if the procedure was part of a flatfoot reconstruction. Patients were given written and verbal instructions at the preoperative visit. Demographic and comprehension surveys were administered at their first visit approximately 2 weeks postoperatively. A total of 50 patients, of which 42 (84%) were female and 43 (86%) had a bachelor’s degree or higher, were enrolled. Results: Mean overall score on the comprehension survey was 6.2/8 (±1.2), mean procedure subscore was 1.8/3 (±0.64), and mean postoperative protocol subscore was 4.4/5 (±0.8). The most frequently missed question asked patients to identify the joint fused in the procedure. Conclusion: Although comprehension and retention of instructions given preoperatively was quite high in our well-educated cohort, our findings highlight the importance of delivering clear instructions preoperatively and reinforcing these instructions often. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective cohort study.

Background: Operative correction of flatfoot deformity has been well studied in the older population. There is a subset of younger patients without congenital foot deformity that also develop a collapsing flatfoot. However, assessment of outcomes across age groups is limited, especially in the young demographic. The purpose of our study was to compare operative outcomes of flatfoot reconstruction between these 2 age groups. Methods: Seventy-six feet (41 left, 35 right) in 71 patients who underwent flexible flatfoot reconstruction were divided into 2 groups based on age: ≤30 years (n = 22) and >30 years (n = 54). Exclusion criteria included congenital causes of flatfoot (tarsal coalition, vertical talus, overcorrected clubfoot). Average age was 20.8 years (range, 14-30) and 55.4 years (range, 35-74) in the younger and older cohorts, respectively. Preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) scores were compared. Five radiographic parameters were assessed pre- and postoperatively: talonavicular coverage angle, lateral talo–first metatarsal angle, lateral talocalcaneal angle, calcaneal pitch, and hindfoot moment arm. Procedures performed and incidence of minor (removal of symptomatic hardware) and major (revision) reoperations were compared. Results: Younger patients were less likely to undergo flexor digitorum longus transfer, first tarsometatarsal fusion, spring ligament repair, and posterior tibial tendon repair (all P < .05). Both younger and older cohorts demonstrated significant improvement in multiple PROMIS domains at an average follow-up of 30.6 (range, 24-44) and 26.8 (range, 24-45) months, respectively ( P = .07). Younger patients demonstrated significantly higher pre- and postoperative Physical Function (mean difference postoperatively, 4.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-7.8; P = .03). There were no differences in radiographic parameters postoperatively. There were 8 (36.4%) reoperations (all minor) in the younger group, and 21 (38.9%) reoperations (6 major, 15 minor) in the older group ( P = .84). Conclusion: Our data suggest that age may play a role in clinical outcomes, procedures indicated, and subsequent corrective reoperations. Younger patients maintained greater physical function with comparable radiographic correction, with less frequent indication for tendon transfers, arthrodesis, and additional corrective surgeries. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Background: Severe adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) is often associated with painful medial column collapse at the naviculocuneiform (NC) joint. However, many surgeons surgically correct the deformity without directly addressing this joint. The purpose of this study was to examine the role of first-tarsometatarsal (TMT) fusion combined with subtalar fusion in correcting deformity at the NC joint. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 40 patients (41 feet) who underwent first-TMT and subtalar (ST) fusion as part of a flatfoot reconstructive procedure. We assessed 6 radiographic parameters both preoperatively and at a minimum of 6 months postoperatively, including talonavicular (TN) coverage angle, lateral talo–first metatarsal angle, lateral talocalcaneal angle, calcaneal pitch, hindfoot moment arm, and a newly defined navicular-cuneiform incongruency angle (NCIA). Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at a minimum 1-year follow-up. Results: The NCIA demonstrated excellent interobserver reliability, with no significant change between pre- and postoperative measurements. All other radiographic parameters, except calcaneal pitch, demonstrated statistically significant improvement postoperatively ( P < .01). Overall, patients had statistically significant improvement in all PROMIS domains ( P < .01), except for depression. Worsening NC deformity was not associated with worse patient-reported outcomes. Conclusions: Our data suggest that when addressing painful collapse of the medial arch in patients with AAFD, fusion of the first-TMT joint in combination with other procedures leads to acceptable radiographic and clinical outcomes. There was no change in deformity at the NC joint in our patient cohort at short-term follow-up, and patients achieved significant improvement in multiple PROMIS domains. Although TMT fusion had no effect on NC deformity, residual or worsening NC deformity did not significantly affect clinical outcomes. In addition, the NCIA was found to be a reliable radiographic parameter to assess NC deformity in the presence of talonavicular and/or first-TMT fusion. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.