Search

Background: Pectoralis major ruptures are rare injuries that occur in young men between 20 and 40 years of age, typically during resistance training in the eccentric phase of muscle contraction. As the incidence of these ruptures increases with increasing activity levels and use of anabolic steroids, it is important to understand effective repair techniques. Indications: Repair of the ruptured pectoralis major tendon is indicated for young, active patients seeking to regain full functionality of the affected upper extremity. Technique Description: In short, after the pectoralis major is identified, the insertion site is revealed just lateral to the biceps tendon. The site for the bone trough is then exposed through cauterization of superficial tissue, and a cortical bone trough is drilled vertically using a small round burr. The location of 3 pilot holes is identified just lateral to the cortical bone trough, and then the holes are drilled to allow for placement of the anchors later in the procedure. The tendon itself is then identified, and sutures are placed in the bulk of the muscle tendon in a Krackow fashion. After the tendon is properly sutured, it is placed under tension to test the structural integrity of the suture pattern and ensure proper load capacity. The sutures are then passed through the pilot holes, the tendon is pulled down into the trough, and the sutures are tied down to the bone. Results: After an appropriate rehabilitation protocol is followed for up to 6 months postoperatively, the transosseous suture technique in the context of pectoralis major tendon repairs allows for adequate tissue to bone healing and near-complete restoration of patient functionality and strength. Conclusion: Acute repair of pectoralis major tendon tears using a transosseous suture technique is effective in restoring upper extremity strength and functionality and is associated with high patient satisfaction. The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Background: Articular cartilage lesions are a significant cause of morbidity and impaired knee function, and attempts to surgically repair damaged cartilage have failed to reliably reproduce native cartilage. Thus, osteochondral allograft transplantation is an effective one-step procedure to repair large cartilage defects. Indications: Osteochondral allograft transplantation is indicated for young active patients with large focal defects, those with a history of previous cartilage repair, and those with cartilage-related degenerative disorders such as osteonecrosis, osteochondritis dissecans, and/or post-traumatic osteochondral defects. Technique Description: In short, after the focal chondral defect is identified, a socket is created with specific dimensions in depth and diameter. The donor cartilage is then secured in a graft station, and a sizing guide is placed through a bushing to confirm the allograft harvest location. Using stabilization from the graft station arm, a coring reamer is then advanced through the donor cartilage, and a saw is used to allow for easy removal of the graft from the donor condyle. The plug is then fashioned to fit the exact dimensions of the socket created earlier in the procedure. A cut on the donor plug is made to fashion the plug to the appropriate depth. A rongeur is used to make the plug more bullet shaped at the end to allow the plug to enter the socket more easily. Small holes are then drilled into the base of the socket to help promote incorporation of the plug into the socket during the healing process. After the socket is irrigated, the plug is then placed into the socket, and a tamp is used to gently tap the cartilage until it is flush with the surrounding surface. Results: After an appropriate rehabilitation protocol is followed for up to 10 months postoperatively, osteochondral allograft transplantation allows for near-to-complete restoration of patient functionality and strength, with return to full activity possible within 1 year. Conclusion: Acute repair of large focal chondral defects is effective in restoring knee strength and functionality and is associated with high patient satisfaction. The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Background: Latissimus dorsi tendon ruptures are rare injuries that can occur in overhead or throwing motions and are almost always sports related. Indications: Latissimus dorsi tendon ruptures are largely treated nonoperatively, although surgical repair is indicated for the young active patient looking to return to a high level of sport and for those with complete avulsion injuries or mid-substance tendon tears. Technique Description: Depending on the degree of tendon retraction, anteroinferior or posteroinferior axillary incision is made. After the tendon is mobilized, sutures are placed in a Krackow fashion through the bulk of the tendon, and the tendon footprint is prepared by gently decorticating the surface of the humerus, just anterior and inferior to the teres major insertion point. Two Arthrex Pec Buttons are then loaded into the superior and inferior limbs of the suture tape and 2 unicortical holes are drilled into the footprint of the insertion site. The superior button is placed first and then tensioned to allow the latissimus dorsi to be pulled to the bone. Next, the second button is placed, though this is not tensioned until later at the time of the biceps tenodesis. Finally, the procedure is visualized and well inspected to ensure appropriate location of the tendon and securing hardware. Results: After an appropriate rehabilitation protocol is followed for up to 6 months postoperatively, acute repair of a ruptured latissimus dorsi tendon allows for near to complete restoration of patient functionality and strength, with return to full activity possible within 6 to 8 months. Conclusion: Surgical repair of a ruptured latissimus dorsi tendon is effective in restoring upper extremity strength and functionality and is associated with high patient satisfaction. The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Management of the subscapularis tendon is a crucial step during the approach for total shoulder arthroplasty. The method of mobilizing the tendon and the technique used to repair it determine the initial integrity of the subscapularis and impact its capacity to heal. Currently, there exist 3 well-described and well-studied approaches to managing and repairing the subscapularis: subscapularis tenotomy, subscapularis peel, and lesser tuberosity osteotomy. More recently, a subscapularis-sparing approach has been proposed as an option. There is debate in the literature regarding which technique provides optimal strength and stability for subscapularis repair following shoulder arthroplasty. In this symposium, we provide an overview of each of the techniques and review the biomechanical studies comparing them.

Background: A paucity of literature exists on the outcomes after Latarjet for anterior shoulder instability in patients with seizure disorders (SDs). The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability in patients with SDs. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing Latarjet from 2013 to 2017 for anterior shoulder instability with minimum 2 years of clinical follow-up was performed. Patients were divided into two groups: patients diagnosed with SD, and patients without a history of seizure (control). Demographics, indications, SD details, and postoperative outcomes were collected. The incidence of complications, recurrent instability, revision surgery, and repeat seizure(s) were also examined. Results: A total of 53 patients were identified, including 10 shoulders in 9 patients with an SD (88.9% male; mean age, 29.2 years [range, 20-37]), and 44 shoulders in 44 non-SD patients (86.4% male; mean age, 30.3 years [range, 18-52]). The mean follow-up time was 3.4 (range, 2.2-4.8) and 3.8 (range, 2.1-5.6) years in the SD and control group, respectively. During the follow-up period, 4 of 9 (44.4%) patients with an SD (50% shoulders) had a recurrent seizure postoperatively. Of those 4 patients, three sustained a recurrent dislocation of the operative shoulder(s) resulting from a postoperative seizure, including one who dislocated bilateral shoulders from a single seizure event after bilateral Latarjet procedures. There was no recurrent instability in patients who did not sustain a seizure in the postoperative period. Having a seizure in the postoperative period significantly increased the risk of recurrent dislocation (OR = 39.9, P = 0.04). Conclusions: Latarjet is a successful operation for recurrent anterior shoulder instability in patients without an SD. While it can still be successful in patients with SD, adequate control of seizures postoperatively is paramount to prevent recurrent instability episodes. Patients with an SD can be advised that if their seizures can remain controlled, they have a high likelihood of clinical success equal to that of patients without an SD.