Search

The recent discovery of Hepatitis D (HDV)-likeviruses across a wide range of taxa led to the establishment of theKolmioviridaefamily. Recent studies suggest that kolmiovirids can be satellites of viruses other than Hepatitis B virus (HBV), challenging the strict HBV/HDV-association dogma. Studying whether kolmiovirids are able to replicate in any animal cell they enter is essential to assess their zoonotic potential. Here, we compared replication of three kolmiovirids: HDV, rodent (RDeV) and snake deltavirus (SDeV)in vitroandin vivo. We show that SDeV has the narrowest and RDeV the broadest host cell range. High resolution imaging of infected cells revealed nuclear viral hubs with a peculiar RNA-protein organization. Finally,in vivohydrodynamic delivery of infectious clones showed that both HDV and RDeV, but not SDeV, efficiently replicate in mouse liver, forming massive nuclear viral hubs. Our comparative analysis lays the foundation for the discovery of specific host factors controllingKolmioviridaehost-shifting.

Background US tools to quantify liver fat content have recently been made clinically available by different vendors, but comparative data on their accuracy are lacking. Purpose To compare the diagnostic performances of the attenuation parameters of US machines from three different manufacturers (vendors 1, 2, and 3) in participants who underwent liver fat quantification with the MRI-derived proton density fat fraction (PDFF). Materials and Methods From July 2020 to June 2021, consecutive participants with chronic liver disease were enrolled in this prospective single-center study and underwent MRI PDFF quantification (reference standard) and US on the same day. US was performed with two different machines from among three vendors assessed. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) for the staging of liver steatosis (MRI PDFF: ≥5.5% for grade ≥S1 and ≥15.5% for grade ≥S2) were calculated in test and validation samples and then compared between vendors in the study sample. Results A total of 534 participants (mean age, 60 years ± 13 [SD]; 320 men) were evaluated. Failure of measurements occurred in less than 1% of participants for all vendors. Correlation coefficients with the MRI PDFF were 0.71, 0.73, and 0.54 for the attenuation coefficients of vendors 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In the test sample, AUCs for diagnosis of steatosis grade S1 and higher and grade S2 and higher were 0.89 and 0.93 for vendor 1 attenuation, 0.88 and 0.92 for vendor 2 attenuation, and 0.79 and 0.79 for vendor 3 attenuation, respectively. In the validation sample, a threshold value of 0.65 for vendor 1 and 0.66 for vendor 2 yielded sensitivity of 77% and 84% and specificity of 78% and 85%, respectively, for diagnosis of grade S1 and higher. Vendor 2 attenuation had greater AUCs than vendor 3 attenuation (

Percutaneous thermal ablation is a validated treatment option for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Steatotic HCC can be reliably detected by magnetic resonance imaging. To determine the clinical relevance of this radiological variant, we included 235 patients (cirrhosis in 92.3%, classified Child‐Pugh A in 97%) from a prospective database on percutaneous thermal ablation for 100 ng/mL (P = 0.045), and multifocality (P = 0.015). During the follow‐up (median: 28.3 months), overall mortality (3.8% vs. 23.5%; P = 0.001) and HCC‐specific mortality (0.0% vs. 14.2%; P = 0.002) rates were lower in patients with steatotic HCC. Early (, Small steatotic HCC is reliably detected by MRI and is associated with slightly less advanced liver disease and a less aggressive tumor phenotype. PTA of such radiological HCC variant results in low rate of early recurrence and HCC‐related deaths, longer time‐to‐recurrence, longer recurrence‐free and overall survivals.

Microvascular invasion (MVI) is one of the main prognostic factors of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT), but its occurrence is unpredictable before surgery. The alpha fetoprotein (AFP) model (composite score including size, number, AFP), currently used in France, defines the selection criteria for LT. This study’s aim was to evaluate the preoperative predictive value of AFP SCORE progression on MVI and overall survival during the waiting period for LT. Data regarding LT recipients for HCC from 2007 to 2015 were retrospectively collected from a single institutional database. Among 159 collected cases, 34 patients progressed according to AFP SCORE from diagnosis until LT. MVI was shown to be an independent histopathological prognostic factor according to Cox regression and competing risk analysis in our cohort. AFP SCORE progression was the only preoperative predictive factor of MVI (OR = 10.79 [2.35–49.4]; p 0.002). The 5-year overall survival in the progression and no progression groups was 63.9% vs. 86.3%, respectively (p = 0.001). Cumulative incidence of HCC recurrence was significantly different between the progression and no progression groups (Sub-HR = 4.89 [CI 2–11.98]). In selected patients, the progression of AFP SCORE during the waiting period can be a useful preoperative tool to predict MVI.

After 2 doses, the efficacy of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination seems to be lower in solid organ transplant recipients than in the immunocompetent population. The objective of this study was to determine the humoral response rate after vaccination, including with a booster dose, and to identify risk factors for non-responsiveness in liver transplant recipients.We included all patients seen in consultation in two French liver transplant centres between January 1, 2021, and March 15, 2021.598 liver transplant recipients were enrolled and 327 were included for analysis. Sixteen patients received one dose, 63 patients two doses and 248 patients three doses. Anti-SARS-Cov-2 antibodies were detected in 242 out of 327 (74.0%) liver transplant patients after vaccination. Considering an optimal serologic response defined as an antibody titre260 BAU/ml, 172 patients (52.6%) were responders. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment was an independent risk factor for a failure to develop anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after vaccination (OR 0.458; 95%CI 0.258-0.813; p = .008). Conversely, male gender (OR 2.247, 95%CI 1.194-4.227; p = .012) and receiving an mRNA vaccine (vs a non-mRNA vaccine) (OR 4.107, 95%CI 1.145-14.731; p = .030) were independent predictive factors for developing an optimal humoral response after vaccination. None of the patients who received the vaccine experienced any serious adverse events.Even after a third booster dose, response rate to vaccination is decreased in liver transplant recipients. MMF appears to be a major determinant of seroconversion and optimal response to vaccination in these patients.

International audience; During liver repair after injury, bile secretion has to be tightly modulated in order to preserve liver parenchyma from bile acid (BA)-induced injury. The mechanisms allowing the liver to maintain biliary homeostasis during repair after injury are not completely understood. Besides their historical role in lipid digestion, bile acids (BA) and their receptors constitute a signalling network with multiple impacts on liver repair, both stimulating regeneration and protecting the liver from BA overload. BA signal through nuclear (mainly Farnesoid X Receptor, FXR) and membrane (mainly G Protein-coupled BA Receptor 1, GPBAR-1 or TGR5) receptors to elicit a wide array of biological responses. While a great number of studies have been dedicated to the hepato-protective impact of FXR signalling, TGR5 is by far less explored in this context. Because the liver has to face massive and potentially harmful BA overload after partial ablation or destruction, BA-induced protective responses crucially contribute to spare liver repair capacities. Based on the available literature, the TGR5 BA receptor protects the remnant liver and maintains biliary homeostasis, mainly through the control of inflammation, biliary epithelial barrier permeability, BA pool hydrophobicity and sinusoidal blood flow. Mouse experimental models of liver injury reveal that in the lack of TGR5, excessive inflammation, leaky biliary epithelium and hydrophobic BA overload result in parenchymal insult and compromise optimal restoration of a functional liver mass. Translational perspectives are thus opened to target TGR5 with the aim of protecting the liver in the context of injury and BA overload.

Simple Summary Liver cancer is the sixth most common cancer world-wide and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common form of primary liver cancer, accounts for 90% of the cases. The diagnosis of HCC is usually based on non-invasive criteria using detection of a liver nodule in abdominal ultrasonography or high serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels. However, as it is only elevated in 60% of patients with HCC, AFP has limited accuracy, especially in early stages, as both a diagnostic and prognostic test. We investigated hPG80 (circulating progastrin), which is associated with liver cancer biology, and found that hPG80 levels is both an independent prognostic marker in HCC and used in combination with AFP, it improves the stratification of the patients in good and poor prognosis, especially for those patients at early-stage. This will help stratify HCC patients more accurately in the future and improve the management of these patients. Abstract Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is the most widely used biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prognosis. However, AFP is not useful in establishing a prognosis for patients with a tumor in the early stages. hPG80 (circulating progastrin) is a tumor promoting peptide present in the blood of patients with various cancers, including HCC. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of plasma hPG80 in patients with HCC, alone or in combination with AFP. A total of 168 HCC patients were tested prospectively for hPG80 and analyzed retrospectively. The prognostic impact of hPG80 and AFP levels on patient survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. hPG80 was detected in 84% of HCC patients. There was no correlation between hPG80 and AFP levels in the training and validation cohorts. Both cohorts showed higher sensitivity of hPG80 compared to AFP, especially at early stages. Patients with high hPG80 (hPG80+) levels (optimal cutoff value 4.5 pM) had significantly lower median overall survival (OS) compared to patients with low hPG80 (hPG80−) levels (12.4 months versus not reached respectively, p < 0.0001). Further stratification by combining hPG80 and AFP levels (cutoff 100 ng/mL) improved prognosis in particular for those patients with low AFP level (hPG80−/AFP+ and hPG80−/AFP−, 13.4 months versus not reached respectively, p < 0.0001 and hPG80+/AFP+ and hPG80+/AFP−, 5.7 versus 26 months respectively, p < 0.0001). This was corroborated when analyses were performed using the BCLC staging especially at early stages. Our findings show that hPG80 could serve as a new prognostic biomarker in HCC. Used in combination with AFP, it improves the stratification of the patients in good and poor prognosis, especially for those patients with negative AFP and early-stage HCC.

International audience

International audience; Background: Various population pharmacokinetic models have been developed to describe the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in adult liver transplantation. However, their extrapolated predictive performance remains unclear in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to predict concentrations using a selected literature model and to improve these predictions by tweaking the model with a subset of the target population.Methods: A literature review was conducted to select an adequate population pharmacokinetic model (L). Pharmacokinetic data from therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus in liver-transplanted adults were retrospectively collected. A subset of these data (70%) was exploited to tweak the L-model using the $PRIOR subroutine of the NONMEM software, with 2 strategies to weight the prior information: full informative (F) and optimized (O). An external evaluation was performed on the remaining data; bias and imprecision were evaluated for predictions a priori and Bayesian forecasting.Results: Seventy-nine patients (851 concentrations) were enrolled in the study. The predictive performance of L-model was insufficient for a priori predictions, whereas it was acceptable with Bayesian forecasting, from the third prediction (ie, with ≥2 previously observed concentrations), corresponding to 1 week after transplantation. Overall, the tweaked models showed a better predictive ability than the L-model. The bias of a priori predictions was -41% with the literature model versus -28.5% and -8.73% with tweaked F and O models, respectively. The imprecision was 45.4% with the literature model versus 38.0% and 39.2% with tweaked F and O models, respectively. For Bayesian predictions, whatever the forecasting state, the tweaked models tend to obtain better results.Conclusions: A pharmacokinetic model can be used, and to improve the predictive performance, tweaking the literature model with the $PRIOR approach allows to obtain better predictions.

Alcohol abstinence before liver transplantation (LT) for alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) is required for every candidate. Some listed patients might relapse, resulting in LT for patients nonabstinent during the pretransplant period. Long-term survival outcomes of these patients have never been studied. We sought to determine whether alcohol consumption on the day of the LT influenced long-term survival after LT. We conducted a retrospective case-control study among French LT centers. Cases were defined as recipients between January 1995 and December 2007 having positive blood and/or urine alcohol levels the day of LT. Each case was paired with 2 controls corresponding to patients transplanted for ALD during the same trimester. Patients were classified into 3 categories per alcohol consumption: abstainers, occasional or transitory excessive consumers, or patients with a sustained excessive consumption (daily consumption >20-30 g/day). During the study period, 3052 LTs for ALD were conducted in France. We identified 42 cases paired with 84 controls. Median blood alcohol level was 0.4 g/L (range 0.1-4.1 g/L) and median urine alcohol level was 0.2 g/L (range 0.1-2.0 g/L). Median follow-up period until death or censoring was 12.9 years (CI95% = [12.3; 13.6]). Long-term survival was not different between the groups. Relapse to any alcohol consumption rate was higher in the case group (59.5%) than in the control group (38.1%, odds ratio 2.44; CI95% = [1.13; 5.27]), but sustained excessive consumption was not significantly different between the groups (33.3% versus 29.8% in case and control groups respectively, χ2 = 0.68). Rates of recurrent cirrhosis and cirrhosis-related deaths were more frequent in the case group. Liver transplantation for nonabstinent patients during the immediate pretransplant period does not result in impaired long-term survival despite higher relapse and recurrent cirrhosis rates.

Backgrounds & AimsAs the bile acid (BA) pool composition is of major impact on liver pathophysiology, we studied its regulation by the BA receptor TGR5, promoting hepatoprotection against BA overload.MethodsWT, total and hepato-specific TGR5-KO, and TGR5-overexpressing mice were used in: partial and 90% extended hepatectomies (EH) upon normal, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)- or cholestyramine (CT)-enriched diet, bile duct ligation (BDL), cholic acid (1%)-enriched diet, and TGR5 agonist (RO) treatments. We thereby studied TGR5 impact on: BA pool composition, liver injury, regeneration and survival. Particular focus was made on gut microbiota (GM) and gallbladder (GB) function analysis. BA pool composition was analyzed in patients undergoing major hepatectomy.ResultsThe TGR5-KO hyperhydrophobic BA pool was not related to BA synthesis alteration, nor to the TGR5-KO GM dysbiosis, as supported by hepatocyte-specific KO mice and cohousing experiments. The TGR5-dependent control of GB dilatation was crucial for BA pool composition, as determined by experiments including RO treatment +/− cholecystectomy. The poor TGR5-KO post-EH survival rate, related with exacerbated peribiliary necrosis and BA overload, was improved by shifting the BA pool towards a more hydrophilic composition (CT and UDCA treatments). After either BDL or CA-enriched diet +/− cholecystectomy, we found that GB dilatation had strong TGR5-dependent hepatoprotective properties. In patients, a more hydrophobic BA pool was correlated with an unfavorable outcome after hepatectomy.ConclusionBA pool composition is crucial for hepatoprotection in mice and humans. We point TGR5 as a key regulator of BA profile and thereby as a potential hepatoprotective target under BA overload conditions.Lay summaryThrough multiple in vivo experimental approaches in mice, together with a patients study, this work brings some new light on the relationships between biliary homeostasis, gallbladder function and liver protection. We showed that the bile acid pool composition is crucial for optimal liver repair, not only in mice but also in human patients undergoing major hepatectomy.

International audience; Alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) is one of the main indications for liver transplantation (LT). Severe alcohol relapse can rapidly lead to recurrent alcohol-related cirrhosis (RAC) for the graft. The aim of this study was to describe the natural history of RAC and the overall survival after LT and after an RAC diagnosis. From 1992 to 2012, 812 patients underwent primary LT for ALD in 5 French transplant centers. All patients with severe alcohol relapse and an RAC diagnosis on the graft were included. The diagnosis of cirrhosis was based on the analysis of liver biopsy or on the association of clinical, biological, radiological, and/or endoscopic features of cirrhosis. RAC was diagnosed in 57/162 patients (35.2%) with severe alcohol relapse, and 31 (54.4%) of those patients had at least 1 episode of liver decompensation. The main types of decompensation were ascites (70.9%), jaundice (58.0%), and hepatic encephalopathy (9.6%). The cumulative probability of decompensation was 23.8% at 5 years, 50.1% at 10 years, and 69.9% at 15 years after LT. During the follow-up, 36 (63.2%) patients died, the main cause of death being liver failure (61.1%). After diagnosis of cirrhosis, the survival rate was 66.3% at 1 year, 37.8% at 5 years, and 20.6% at 10 years. In conclusion, RAC is associated with a high risk of liver decompensation and a poor prognosis. Prevention of severe alcohol relapse after LT is a major goal to improve patient survival.

Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is the most severe vascular complication occurring after liver transplantation, with an incidence ranging from 2 to 9% in adults. Although the ideal arterial reconstruction is often described as a short and non-redundant anastomosis fashioned between the recipient and donor hepatic arteries, there is no strong evidence about this ideal reconstruction in the literature. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the type of arterial reconstruction on early HAT after primary liver transplantation. We retrospectively reviewed a contemporary MELD era cohort of 282 patients who underwent deceased donor primary liver transplantation from 2007 to 2012. Graft artery was classified as “short” when the section was located at the proper/common hepatic artery or “long” when the celiac trunk was used for anastomosis. Recipient arterial sites for arterial anastomosis were classified in three sites: (1) “distal” (proper hepatic artery or common hepatic artery/gastro-duodenal bifurcation), (2) “intermediate” (common hepatic artery) and (3) “proximal” (celiac trunk–splenic artery–aorta). We used univariate and multivariate analyses to assess the impact of different types of arterial reconstruction on early HAT. Of 282 primary liver transplantations, 17 patients (6%) developed early HAT. Patients with and without early HAT had comparable demographic and operative data. The main anastomotic combination was short graft artery on the recipient-common hepatic artery (n = 111, 39%). A long graft artery was used in 91 patients (32%) and was associated with hepatic artery variations (56%; n = 51; p = 0.001). Arterial reconstructions using a long graft artery (p = 0.003), a recipient proximal site as celiac trunk–splenic artery–aorta (p = 0.02) and the combination of a long graft artery on the recipient distal hepatic artery (p = 0.02) were significantly associated with early HAT. The early HAT rate in patients with a long graft artery was not significantly different between patients with or without donor arterial variation (respectively, 12% (n = 6/51) vs. 12% (n = 5/40); p = 1). In multivariate analysis, the use of a long graft artery, whatever the recipient anastomosis site, was an independent risk factor of early HAT (OR 3.2; 95% CI 1.2–9; p = 0.02). The type of arterial reconstruction used for arterial anastomosis during primary liver transplantation has an impact on the occurrence of early HAT. The use of a long graft artery is an independent risk factor of early HAT. Thereby, we recommend the use of a short graft artery with a direct path when feasible to reduce the occurrence of early HAT after primary liver transplantation.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cancer with high mortality. The limited therapeutic options for advanced disease include treatment with Sorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor whose targets include the Mediator kinase CDK8. Since CDK8 has reported oncogenic activity in Wnt-dependent colorectal cancer, we investigated whether it is also involved in HCC. We find that CDK8 and its paralogue CDK19 are significantly overexpressed in HCC patients, where high levels correlate with poor prognosis. Liver-specific genetic deletion of CDK8 in mice is well supported and protects against chemical carcinogenesis. Deletion of either CDK8 or CDK19 in hepatic precursors had little effect on gene expression in exponential cell growth but prevented oncogene-induced transformation. This phenotype was reversed by concomitant deletion of TP53. These data support important and non-redundant roles for mediator kinases in liver carcinogenesis, where they genetically interact with the TP53 tumor suppressor.

International audience; Up to 50% of liver transplantation (LT) recipients with known or clandestine alcohol-use disorder (AUD) before surgery return to alcohol use after LT. However, only severe alcohol relapse, which varies in frequency from 11% to 26% of patients, has an impact on longterm survival and significantly decreases survival rates after 10 years. Therefore, it is crucial to identify patients with the highest risk of severe relapse in order to arrange specific, standardized monitoring by an addiction team before and after LT. The aims of this study were to describe the effects of combined management of AUD on the rate of severe alcohol relapse and to determine the risk factors before LT that predict severe relapse. Patients transplanted between January 2008 and December 2014 who had met with the LT team's addiction specialist were included in the study. Patients who exhibited alcohol-related relapse risk factors received specific addiction follow-up. A total of 235 patients were enrolled in the study. Most of them were men (79%), and the mean age at the time of the LT was 55.7 years. Severe relapse occurred in only 9% of the transplant recipients. Alcohol-related factors of severe relapse were a pretransplant abstinence of 6 months and family, legal, or professional consequences of alcohol consumption, whereas the nonalcohol-related factors were being single and being eligible for a disability pension. In conclusion, the integration of an addiction team in a LT center may be beneficial. The addiction specialist can identify patients at risk of severe relapse in the pretransplantation period and hence arrange for specific follow-up.

Purpose To identify predictive factors of tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity using three-dimensional (3D) voxel-based dosimetry in patients with intermediate and advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated by yttrium-90 (90Y) resin microspheres radioembolization (RE). Materials and Methods From February 2012 to December 2015, 45 90Y resin microspheres RE procedures were performed for HCC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B/C; n = 15/30). Area under the dose-volume histograms (AUDVHs) were calculated from 3D voxel-based dosimetry to measure 90Y dose deposition. Factors associated with tumor control (ie, complete/partial response or stable disease on Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) at 6 months were investigated. PFS and OS analyses were performed (Kaplan-Meier). Toxicity was assessed by occurrence of radioembolization-induced liver disease (REILD). Results Tumor control rate was 40.5% (17/42). Complete tumor targeting (odds ratio = 36.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.83–747; P 61 Gy, complete tumor targeting and AUDVHtumor 61 Gy had median PFS of 2.7, 1.8, 6.3, and 12.1 months (P Conclusions Complete tumor targeting and 90Y dose to tumor are independent factors associated with tumor control and clinical outcomes.

International audience

Alcohol relapse after liver transplantation (LT) for alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is a common event that has been extensively studied. In contrast, alcohol consumption has usually been neglected in patients transplanted for other liver diseases. First off, patients can be mislabeled as 'non-ALD' when they suffer from another chronic liver disease. Then, alcohol consumption is not systematically tracked after LT in recipients having a primary indication other than ALD, although there are increasing data incriminating alcohol as responsible for graft damage and impaired survival. This review discusses the potential consequences of alcohol after liver transplantation, focusing on patients transplanted for non-alcoholic liver disease, as well as the legitimate role of an addiction specialist, before and after LT. Short summary Alcohol relapse after liver transplantation (LT) for alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is a common event that has been extensively studied. In contrast, alcohol consumption has usually been neglected in patients transplanted for other liver diseases. There are increasing data showing that alcohol consumption and its consequences should be tracked in every transplant candidate and recipient.

International audience; The PIRCHE (Predicted Indirectly ReCognizable HLA Epitopes) score is an HLA epitope matching algorithm. PIRCHE algorithm estimates the level of presence of T-cell epitopes in mismatched HLA. The PIRCHE-II numbers associate with de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) formation following liver transplantation and kidney allograft survival following renal transplantation. The aim of our study was to assess the PIRCHE-II score in calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free maintenance immunosuppression recipients. This was a retrospective study of forty-one liver transplant recipients on CNI-free immunosuppression and with available liver allograft biopsies. Donors and recipients were HLA typed. The HLA-derived mismatched peptide epitopes that could be presented by the recipient's HLA-DRB1 molecules were calculated using PIRCHE-II algorithm. The associations between PIRCHE-II scores and graft immune-mediated events were assessed using receiver operating characteristics curves and subsequent univariate and multivariate analyses. CNI-free patients with cellular rejection, humoral rejection, or severe portal inflammation had higher mean PIRCHE-II scores compared to patients with normal liver allografts. PIRCHE-II score and donor age were independent risk factors for liver graft survival in CNI-free patients (HR: 8.0, 95% CI: 1.3-49, p = .02; and HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.00-0.96, p = .007, respectively). PIRCHE-II scores could be predictive of liver allograft survival in CNI-free patients following liver transplantation. Larger studies are needed to confirm these results.

The hepatic vein access during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) can be challenging in liver transplant recipient patients, especially when piggyback anastomosis was performed. We described a modified technique and reviewed the clinical outcomes of TIPS in transplanted patients. From 2015 to 2016, 8 patients with history of liver transplantation using a three-hepatic vein piggyback technique for venous anastomosis underwent a TIPS in our institution. Indications were refractory ascites (n = 7) or variceal bleeding (n = 1). When the hepatic vein access failed via the standard jugular route, a pull-through technique was used: After puncturing the right hepatic vein under ultrasound guidance, a guidewire and a vascular sheath were advanced, then the guidewire was snared in the inferior vena cava and retrieved though the jugular access, and the hepatic vein was catheterized along the guidewire. The safety and technical success rates of this technique and the clinical outcomes of the study population were retrospectively assessed. Seven of 8 patients (87.5%) required the pull-through technique to access a hepatic vein. No complications of the percutaneous access of the hepatic vein were found at the one-day and one-month ultrasound Doppler examinations. Among 7 patients who had refractory ascites, 3 had complete resolution of ascites (43%), and one had moderate improvement. One patient with refractory infected ascites on severe graft failure and one with massive bleeding died soon after the procedure. A pull-through technique following percutaneous puncture of a hepatic vein is a safe technique for performing a TIPS in liver transplant recipients with piggyback anastomosis complicated by acute hepatic vein angulation.

International audience; Liver transplantation (LT) is the gold standard treatment for end-stage liver disease. Whatever the primary indication of LT, substance abuse after surgery may decrease survival rates and quality of life. Prevalence of severe alcohol relapse is between 11 and 26%, and reduces life expectancy regardless of the primary indication of LT. Many patients on waiting lists for LT are smokers and this is a major risk factor for both malignant tumors and cardiovascular events post-surgery. The aim of this review is to describe psychoactive substance consumption after LT, and to assess the impact on liver transplant recipients. This review describes data about alcohol and illicit drug use by transplant recipients and suggests guidelines for behavior management after surgery. The presence of an addiction specialist in a LT team seems to be very important.

International audience; The last thirty years have been very prosperous in the field of liver transplantation (LT), with great advances in organ conservation, surgical techniques, peri-operative management and long-term immunosuppression, resulting in improved patient and graft survival rates as well as quality of life. However, substance addiction after LT, namely alcohol and tobacco, results in short term morbidity together with medium and long-term mortality. The main consequences can be vascular (increased risk of hepatic artery thrombosis in smokers), hepatic (recurrent alcoholic cirrhosis in alcohol relapsers) and oncological (increased risk of malignancy in patients consuming tobacco and/or alcohol after LT). This issue has thus drawn attention in the field of LT research. The management of these two at-risk behaviors addictions need the implication of hepatologists and addiction specialists, before and after LT. This review will summarize our current knowledge in alcohol use and cigarette smoking in the setting of LT, give practical tools for identification of high risk patients and treatment options.

International audience; BACKGROUND:Alcohol relapses after liver transplantation (LT) constitute a critical issue. Because there is no widely accepted definition of LT, its prevalence varies from 7 to 95% across studies. Only a severe relapse, the frequency of which is estimated to be 11 to 26%, decreases life expectancy after 5 years of LT and requires specific care. To improve the early identification of alcohol consumption among transplanted patients, liver transplant teams may be helped by input from an addiction team. Nevertheless, added benefit of involvement by addiction specialists in treating posttransplant patients has not been demonstrated. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the evaluation of the alcohol consumption after LT performed routinely during the transplant consultation or obtained from a specific addiction consultation.METHODS:This was a prospective single-site study. Patients were seen consecutively by their hepatologist and by an addiction specialist, and they completed the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C). Thus, the patient's alcohol status was assessed using 3 different sources of information: the hepatologist's interview, the AUDIT-C score, and the addiction specialist visit.RESULTS:One hundred forty-one patients were consecutively evaluated. Alcohol consumption was identified by the hepatologist in 31 patients (21.9%), in 52 (36.8%) using the AUDIT-C questionnaire, and in 58 (41.1%) by the addiction specialist. The 31 patients concerned reported an average of 6.5 alcohol units/wk to the transplant physician, a number which was significantly greater (p = 0.001) by 8.6 units/wk when they were interviewed by the addiction specialist.CONCLUSIONS:This study highlights the clinical utility of a systematic addiction consultation among liver transplant patients, irrespective of the reason for transplantation.

International audience; BACKGROUND & AIMS: Liver transplantation (LT) for the most severely ill patients with cirrhosis, with multiple organ dysfunction (accurately assessed by the acute-on-chronic liver failure [ACLF] classification) remains controversial. We aimed to report the results of LT in patients with ACLF grade 3 and to compare these patients to non-transplanted patients with cirrhosis and multiple organ dysfunction as well as to patients transplanted with lower ACLF grade. METHODS: All patients with ACLF-3 transplanted in three liver intensive care units (ICUs) were retrospectively included. Each patient with ACLF-3 was matched to a) non-transplanted patients hospitalized in the ICU with multiple organ dysfunction, or b) control patients transplanted with each of the lower ACLF grades (three groups). RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were included. These severely ill patients were transplanted following management to stabilize their condition with a median of nine days after admission (progression of mean organ failure from 4.03 to 3.67, p=0.009). One-year survival of transplanted patients with ACLF-3 was higher than that of non-transplanted controls: 83.9 vs. 7.9%, p\textless0.0001. This high survival rate was not different from that of matched control patients with no ACLF (90%), ACLF-1 (82.3%) or ACLF-2 (86.2%). However, a higher rate of complications was observed (100 vs. 51.2 vs. 76.5 vs. 74.3%, respectively), with a longer hospital stay. The notion of a "transplantation window" is discussed. CONCLUSIONS: LT strongly influences the survival of patients with cirrhosis and ACLF-3 with a 1-year survival similar to that of patients with a lower grade of ACLF. A rapid decision-making process is needed because of the short "transplantation window" suggesting that patients with ACLF-3 should be rapidly referred to a specific liver ICU. Lay summary: Liver transplantation improves survival of patients with very severe cirrhosis. These patients must be carefully monitored and managed in a specialized unit. The decision to transplant a patient must be quick to avoid a high risk of mortality.

Tissue repair is orchestrated by a finely tuned interplay between processes of regeneration, inflammation and cell protection, allowing organisms to restore their integrity after partial loss of cells or organs. An important, although largely unexplored feature is that after injury and during liver repair, liver functions have to be maintained to fulfill the peripheral demand. This is particularly critical for bile secretion, which has to be finely modulated in order to preserve liver parenchyma from bile-induced injury. However, mechanisms allowing the liver to maintain biliary homeostasis during repair after injury are not completely understood. Besides cytokines and growth factors, bile acids (BA) and their receptors constitute an insufficiently explored signaling network during liver regeneration and repair. BA signal through both nuclear (mainly Farnesoid X Receptor, FXR) and membrane (mainly G Protein-coupled BA Receptor 1, GPBAR-1 or TGR5) receptors which distributions are large in the organism, and which activation elicits a wide array of biological responses. While a number of studies have been dedicated to FXR signaling in liver repair processes, TGR5 remains poorly explored in this context. Because of the massive and potentially harmful BA overload that faces the remnant liver after partial ablation or destruction, both BA-induced adaptive and proliferative responses may stand in a central position to contribute to the regenerative response. Based on the available literature, both BA receptors may act in synergy during the regeneration process, in order to protect the remnant liver and maintain biliary homeostasis, otherwise potentially toxic BA overload would result in parenchymal insult and compromise optimal restoration of a functional liver mass.

International audience; The use of liver transplantation (LT) as a treatment for alcoholic liver disease (ALD) has been highly controversial since the beginning. The ever increasing shortage of organs has accentuated the low priority given to patients suffering from ALD, which is considered a "self-inflicted" condition. However, by improving the long-term survival rates, making them similar to those from other indications, and recognizing that alcoholism is a primary disease, ALD has become one of the most common indications for LT in Europe and North America, a situation thought unfathomable thirty years ago. Unfortunately, there are still many issues with the use of this procedure for ALD. There are significant relapse rates, and the consequences of excessive drinking after LT range from asymptomatic biochemical and histological abnormalities to graft failure and death. A minimum three-month period of sobriety is required for an improvement in liver function, thus making LT unnecessary, and to demonstrate the patient's commitment to the project, even though a longer abstinence period does not guarantee lower relapse rates after LT. Recent data have shown that LT is also effective for severe alcoholic hepatitis when the patient is unresponsive to corticosteroids therapy, with low relapse rates in highly selected patients, although these results must be confirmed before LT becomes a standard procedure in this setting. Finally, LT for ALD is accompanied by an increased risk of de novo solid organ cancer, skin cancer, and lymphoproliferative disorders, which has a large impact on the survival rates.

International audience; Liver transplantation has been the treatment of choice for end-stage liver disease since 1983. Cancer has emerged as a major long-term cause of death for liver transplant recipients. Many retrospective studies that have explored standardized incidence ratio have reported increased rates of solid organ cancers post-liver transplantation; some have also studied risk factors. Liver transplantation results in a two to five-fold mean increase in the rate of solid organ cancers. Risk of head and neck, lung, esophageal, cervical cancers and Kaposi's sarcoma is high, but risk of colorectal cancer is not clearly demonstrated. There appears to be no excess risk of developing breast or prostate cancer. Environmental risk factors such as viral infection and tobacco consumption, and personal risk factors such as obesity play a key role, but recent data also implicate the role of calcineurin inhibitors, whose cumulative and dose-dependent effects on cell metabolism might play a direct role in oncogenesis. In this paper, we review the results of studies assessing the incidence of non-skin solid tumors in order to understand the mechanisms underlying solid cancers in post-liver transplant patients and, ultimately, discuss how to prevent these cancers. Immunosuppressive protocol changes, including a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen, combined with dietary guidelines and smoking cessation, are theoretically the best preventive measures.

International audience; Although increased rates of solid organ cancers have been reported following liver transplantation (LT), the impact of quantitative exposure to calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) remains unclear. We have therefore probed the relationship between the development of solid organ cancers following LT and the level of CNI exposure. This prospective single-center study was conducted between 1995 and 2008 and is based on 247 tacrolimus-treated liver transplant recipients who survived at least 1 year following surgery. The incidence of cancer was recorded, and the mean blood concentration of tacrolimus (TC) was determined at 1 and 3 years following LT. The study results indicate that 43 (17.4%) patients developed de novo solid cancers. Mean TC during the first year after LT was significantly higher in patients who developed solid organ tumors (10.3 ± 2.1 vs. 7.9 ± 1.9 ng/mL, p

Background & Aims Increased rates of solid organ cancers post-liver transplantation have been reported, but the contribution of environmental factors and immunosuppressive therapy is not clear. This study's aims were to compare the incidence of de novo solid organ cancers after liver transplantation; identify risk factors independent of immunosuppressive therapy associated with these cancers; and assess the influence of calcineurin inhibitors on the appearance of these cancers. Methods This single-centre study from 1991 to 2008 included 465 liver recipients who had survived for ≥1 year. Gross incidence rates were standardized by age and sex, using the global population as a reference. In addition, 322 of the 465 patients treated for ≥1 year with calcineurin inhibitors were studied. Results Sixty-five (13.9%) of the 465 patients developed de novo solid cancers. The overall relative risk was 3.7. Significantly increased relative risks were observed for digestive, oesophageal, colorectal, oral and lung cancers, but not for genito-urinary and breast cancers. Among the 65 patients who developed solid organ cancers, 43 died (66.1%), 41 from cancer. The two independent risk factors were pretransplant smoking [P

L’insuffisance rénale chronique aggrave le pronostic vital des patients atteints de cirrhose hospitalisés pour décompensation. On ne connaît pas la prévalence de cette pathologie parmi les patients atteints de cirrhose compensée. Par ailleurs, les outils de mesure de la fonction rénale actuels ont des limites chez des patients atteints de cirrhose, notamment à cause d’une forte prévalence de dénutrition dans cette population. L’objectif de notre étude était d’établir une prévalence de l’insuffisance rénale chronique parmi des patients suivis pour cirrhose compensée. Par ailleurs on désirait évaluer l’intérêt de la cystatine-C comme marqueur de la fonction rénale chez ces patients. Méthode : nous avons réalisé une étude prospective, monocentrique, observationnelle incluant des patients atteints de cirrhose CHILD A ou B. Les patients ayant un DFG < 75 mL/min/1.73 m² ont été revus en consultation avec un nouveau dosage et un bilan étiologique. Résultats : 169 patients ont été inclus entre septembre 2019 et août 2020, 24 patients ont été exclus (1 greffe hépatique, 1 greffe rénale, 3 décès, 19 perdus de vus). Dans notre cohorte, la prévalence de patients en insuffisance rénale chronique est de 17,4 %. Le taux de cystatine-C est corrélé à la fonction rénale de façon significative avec un coefficient de relation de Pearson de 0,922 et un intervalle de confiance à 95 % compris entre [0,847 ; 0,961]. La p.value associée est < 0,0001.Conclusion : notre étude montre un taux d’insuffisance rénale chronique élevé parmi des patients cirrhotiques compensés. Le taux de cystatine-C semble être corrélé à la fonction rénale de ces patients.

L’ascite est une complication fréquente de la cirrhose. Elle constitue un tournant évolutif de la maladie. Les possibilités thérapeutiques sont la réalisation de ponctions itératives, peu confortables pour le patient, la transplantation hépatique, pas toujours accessible, et enfin la pose d’un TIPS (Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt), dont l’efficacité a été démontrée dans de nombreuses études. Plusieurs facteurs pronostiques ont été mis en évidence pour prédire l’apparition de complications après la pose d’un TIPS. En revanche, très peu d’études se sont penchées sur l’impact du volume hépatique et splénique. L’objectif de notre étude était d’étudier l’impact du volume hépatique et splénique sur la survie sans transplantation hépatique après pose de TIPS pour ascite réfractaire.Méthodes : il s’agit d’une étude observationnelle, monocentrique, rétrospective menée au CHU de Montpellier. Tous les patients ayant bénéficié de la pose d’un TIPS entre janvier 2015 et octobre 2020 pour ascite réfractaire ont été inclus.Résultats : sur 162 TIPS posés, 74 patients ont été inclus. Le suivi médian était de 24 mois. Au cours du suivi, 25 patients sont décédés (34,7 %) et 14 patients ont été transplantés hépatiques (18,9 %). En analyse univariée, les facteurs associés à une diminution de la survie sans transplantation hépatique étaient le taux d’hémoglobine (p = 0,0267), de plaquettes (p < 0,001), de leucocytes (p = 0,009), un antécédent d’encéphalopathie hépatique (p = 0,0314), le score de CHILD (p = 0,003) et de MELD Na (p < 0,0001), ainsi que le rapport volume hépatique / volume splénique (p < 0,0001).En analyse multivariée, les variables significatives de la survie sans transplantation étaient le taux de plaquettes (HR 0,985 IC 95 % [0,976-0,995], p = 0,0026), un antécédent d’encéphalopathie hépatique (HR 3.2 IC 95 % [1,068-10,149], p = 0,0381), un hydrothorax associé (HR 6,62 IC 95 % [1,916-22,889], p = 0,0028), le rapport volume hépatique / volume splénique (HR 0.683 IC 95 % [0.506 ; 0.921], p = 0.0125), ainsi que le gradient de pression portosystémique après TIPS (HR 1.319 IC 95 % [1.099-1.584], p = 0.003).Conclusion : notre étude suggère que le rapport entre le volume hépatique et le volume splénique pourrait être un facteur prédictif de survie sans transplantation hépatique après une pose de TIPS pour ascite réfractaire. Des études complémentaires sont nécessaires pour étayer cette hypothèse.