Search

Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for weight loss and obesity-related comorbidity resolution. However, bariatric surgery is not readily offered in specific populations due to the lack of data assessing its feasibility. This study intends to evaluate bariatric surgery in patients with an existing ostomy.We conducted a retrospective case series to assess the safety of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in patients with an end ileostomy or colostomy. Patient demographics, including obesity-related comorbidities, overall health status (American Society of Anesthesiologists score), and short-term complications (up to 30 days postoperatively), were analyzed.Six patients were included. The mean age was 58 years, and the mean preoperative body mass index was 41.6. Three patients had a colostomy, and three had an ileostomy. The mean time of ostomy before surgery was 11 years. Two ostomies were due to trauma, two due to inflammatory bowel disease, one due to cancer, and one due to scleroderma. Mean postoperative follow-up was 23 months. No patient had increased ostomy output or infusion center visit. One patient had an ED visit, one had a short-term complication, and one had SG conversion to RYGB.Bariatric surgery is technically feasible in selected patients with ileostomy/colostomy with a reasonable short-term safety profile.

Patients undergoing bariatric surgery with body mass index (BMI)50 kg/m 2 are at a higher risk of surgical morbidity when compared with less obese patients, however, there is limited data correlating surgical risk and efficacy with increasing BMI in patients with severe obesity. We hypothesize that regardless of the degree above 50 kg/m 2 their BMI, patients with severe obesity respond similarly to bariatric surgery.We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with BMI50 kg/m 2 who underwent biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, or sleeve gastrectomy at a single institution. Outcomes were compared in patients with a BMI between 50 and 60 kg/m 2 to patients with a BMI60 kg/m 2 and included percent total weight loss as well as early and late complications. Statistical analyses were performed using logistic regression, univariate, and multivariate models.There were 571 patients with BMI50 kg/m 2 who underwent bariatric surgery at our center, 170 (29.8%) had a BMI60 kg/m 2 . Percent total weight loss was statistically significant between the BMI 50 and 60 kg/m 2 and BMI60 kg/m 2 groups at 24 months ( P =0.047) but not at 60 months ( P =0.54). No significant difference was found in the incidence of early complications in a univariate ( P =0.46) or a multivariate ( P =0.06) analysis. The BMI60 subgroup was associated with a higher rate of late complications in univariate analysis (heart rate=2.37; 1.03-5.47, P =0.04), but not in multivariate analysis ( P =0.78).Efficacy and complication rates of bariatric surgeries are similar in patients with BMI 50 to 60 kg/m 2 and60 kg/m 2 , providing evidence supporting similar management of patients despite specific subgroups.

Investigate oncologic and functional outcomes associated with transhyoid and lateral pharyngotomy (transpharyngeal) approaches in the treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).Retrospective review.Single institution (tertiary care center).This is a retrospective case series of patients with OPSCC undergoing transpharyngeal resection from 1990 to 2017 at Mayo Clinic. Oncologic outcomes, postoperative complications, objective swallowing data, and rates of tracheostomy and percutaneous gastrostomy tube dependence were recorded.Of 83 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 56 (68%) were human papillomavirus positive. Overall survival rates at 5 and 10 years following surgery were 85% and 80%, respectively. Cancer-specific survival rates at these same time points were 90% and 88%. Following treatment, 35 of 49 patients (71%) had a Functional Oral Intake Scale score ≥5, indicating total oral intake of multiple consistencies; 79 of 82 (96%) were without tracheostomy or laryngectomy; and 71 of 81 (88%) were on a full oral diet.Transpharyngeal approaches provide adequate functional and oncologic outcomes in the majority of patients with OPSCC. These results may have important implications for patients who are not candidates for, or are unwilling to undergo, nonoperative therapy or for those without access to radiation therapy.

Background Duodenal switch (DS) still comprises less than 1% of the overall primary procedures in the United States. Our aim is to explore the reasons behind surgeons’ reluctance to DS adoption. Objectives To determine perceived reasons for the widespread lack of adoption of the DS. Setting Worldwide survey of closed bariatric surgery social media groups. Methods A standardized questionnaire was posted on 2 closed social media bariatric groups. DS was used as an umbrella term that includes traditional BPD with duodenal switch, single anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy (SADI) and loop DS. The questionnaire link was accessible to bariatric surgeons only for a period of 1 week. Results Survey responses (n = 193) were analyzed. The majority (75%) were fellowship-trained bariatric surgeons, and 58% were practicing in the United States. Although 72.9% believed DS to be a good bariatric procedure, it was not being performed by 64% of the respondents. The main reasons behind DS nonadoption included a perceptible high long-term complication rate (43.5%), lack of training (38.1%), and procedure seldomly demanded by patients (31.5%). For surgeons who perform DS, 16.4% use it as a revisional procedure, mainly following sleeve gastrectomy (40.5%). Finally, 29.5% of surgeons believed that the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery endorsement of SADI will encourage them to add DS to their practice. They are mostly planning to do so by visiting other surgeons and getting proctored (42.6%). Conclusion This survey will help guide bariatric societies and governing bodies in addressing the issues and concerns preventing surgeons from adopting DS in their practice by elucidating the chief reasons and circumstances behind this occurrence.

The outcomes of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) on gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) are not well elucidated. This retrospective review included patients undergoing laparoscopic primary BPD-DS at Mayo Clinic from 2009 to 2019. GERD parameters analyzed included subjective symptom report/anti-reflux medication intake and/or endoscopic findings. GERD-HRQL questionnaire was also utilized post-operatively. Three subgroups were employed to stratify patients depending on GERD outcomes: the “No-effect” subgroup included patients where surgery did not affect either positively (GERD resolution) or negatively (de novo GERD) GERD outcome, “De novo GERD” subgroup, and “GERD-resolved” subgroup. Multinomial logistic modeling was used to examine associations with the 3-level GERD subgroup (p

Oronasal fistula (ONF) is a common complication encountered after palatoplasty. Repair is indicated when symptoms impact speech and swallowing. In spite of the variety of surgical approaches described to repair these defects, recurrence rates remain high. Traditionally, successful closure is said to be achieved in using a double-layered approach due to the three-dimensional aspect of the defect. The extent of the fistula into the nasal cavity has incited an increased curiosity in using local endonasal flaps. In recent years, endonasal reconstructive procedures have seen increased interest and application, from cranial base defect repairs to orbital reconstruction and beyond. The nasoseptal (NSF) and inferior turbinate flaps (ITF) possess a robust arterial supply and an exceptional reach with excellent results demonstrated in large defect repair. However, the use of these flaps in ONF repair is scarcely discussed in the literature, and their effectiveness is relatively undetermined. In this manuscript, we present a series of three patients who underwent a triple layer ONF closure, with the oral portion incorporating a turn-in mucosal flap plus a local palate rotation flap or greater palatine artery pedicled-rotation flap, and a NSF or an ITF for the nasal portion of the defect.

To identify the differences in sensitivity and accuracy between ultrasound-guided and palpation-guided fine needle aspirations (FNA) of suspicious lymph nodes in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV) (+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Additional objectives included identifying patient specific factors affecting biopsy accuracy and evaluating potential differences in accuracy between fine and core needle biopsies.Retrospective chart review.A retrospective study of diagnostic sensitivity was completed at a single tertiary care center between 1/1/2006-12/31/2016. Participants included patients who underwent pretreatment FNA biopsy with HPV(+)OPSCC confirmed pathologically following neck dissection or excisional lymph node biopsy. A true positive (TP) on FNA biopsy was defined as an FNA biopsy concerning for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) that was confirmed on excisional biopsy or neck dissection. A false negative (FN) was defined as a negative FNA but metastatic disease identified on excisional biopsy or neck dissection. Sensitivity was calculated as TPs/(TPs + FNs). Sensitivity was compared among techniques using chi-square and Fisher exact tests.A total of 209 FNA biopsies among 198 patients were included in the study, including 31 (15%) palpation-guided FNAs, 160 (77%) ultrasound-guided FNAs, and 18 (9%) ultrasound-guided FNA + core biopsies. Sensitivity was significantly different among palpation-guided FNA, ultrasound-guided FNA, and ultrasound-guided FNA + core biopsies (48% vs. 83% vs. 94%, respectively; P .001) but there was no significant difference in sensitivity between ultrasound-guided FNA versus ultrasound-guided FNA + core biopsies (P = .31).The use of ultrasound guidance in FNA biopsies of nodal metastases in HPV(+)OPSCC improves sensitivity compared to palpation guidance alone. Ultrasound guided biopsies are preferred in patients with suspected nodal metastasis from HPV(+)OPSCC.3 Laryngoscope, 132:2396-2402, 2022.

The outcomes of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) on gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) are not well elucidated.This retrospective review included patients undergoing laparoscopic primary BPD-DS at Mayo Clinic from 2009 to 2019. GERD parameters analyzed included subjective symptom report/anti-reflux medication intake and/or endoscopic findings. GERD-HRQL questionnaire was also utilized post-operatively. Three subgroups were employed to stratify patients depending on GERD outcomes: the "No-effect" subgroup included patients where surgery did not affect either positively (GERD resolution) or negatively (de novo GERD) GERD outcome, "De novo GERD" subgroup, and "GERD-resolved" subgroup. Multinomial logistic modeling was used to examine associations with the 3-level GERD subgroup (p0.05).Seventy-six patients were included in the analysis. Thirty-four (44.7%) patients were found to be in the "GERD-resolved" subgroup, 28 (36.8%) patients in the "No-effect" subgroup, and 14 (18.4%) patients in the "De novo GERD" subgroup. Multinomial logistic modeling showed that patients with pre-surgery diabetes mellitus (DM) had lesser odds (OR= 0.248, (95% CI: 0.085-0.724, p=0.0108)) of GERD resolution than patients without pre-surgery DM. An association was also established between %TWL at 6 and 12 months following the procedure and GERD outcome (p=0.017 and 0.008, respectively). Finally, the mean (SD) post-operative GERD-HRQL score was 8.7 (8.1) points, and 69 (91%) patients were currently satisfied with their post-operative condition.Laparoscopic BPD-DS appears to have a satisfactory GERD outcome in most patients undergoing the operation. There appears to be an association between pre-operative DM, %TWL at 6 and 12 months, and GERD prognosis in this population.

To illustrate a previously unreported method of tracheal stent removal that appears to cause less mucosal injury we present a case of a 9-year-old Down syndrome patient with a history of tracheoesophageal fistula, brought to our attention after recurrent bouts of exacerbating cough and tracheo-bronchitis. Endoscopic examination under general anesthesia noted the presence of severe tracheomalacia with inspiratory collapse, and a 10-mm balloon expandable metallic stent (BEMS) was deployed and symptomatic improvement was noted. The initial stent was then removed to consider a definitive procedure using the typical grasping fashion with an alligator forceps and expected mucosal excoriation was noted. Due to symptom recurrence, the patient underwent placement of a second BEMS stent. Initial improvement was noted followed by recurrent episodes of respiratory distress due to granulation tissue formation and stent compression and a decision to remove the stent was made. A new method of stent removal deemed ABC (airway balloon collapse) method was utilized where an expandable airway balloon is placed outside the stent between the stent and tracheal wall and then inflated to collapse the stent, facilitating easy removal.