Search

Background and Aims: The current opioid epidemic in the United States began 20 years ago and has become the leading cause of accidental deaths in the country. This crisis prompted us to explore trends in opioid abuse and dependence worldwide. We sought to identify other countries at high‐risk of opioid use disorders, using the World Health Organization's (WHO) pharmacovigilance database. Methods: We performed a disproportionality analysis using VigiBase, the WHO Global Individual Case Safety Report (ICSR) database. Five opioids used worldwide were included: oxycodone, fentanyl, morphine, tramadol, and codeine. We extracted all ICSRs associated with the drugs of interest, considered as suspect medication and recorded up until 5 June 2021, using the narrow Standardised MedDRA Query (SMQ) for drug abuse and dependence. Countries with at least one ICSR for each of the five opioids were retained. The relationship between the use of a drug (i.e. an opioid) and the occurrence of an adverse drug reaction (i.e. drug abuse and dependence) for each country was assessed by calculating the information component (IC) and its 99.9% CI [IC0005; IC9995], using a quasi‐Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN). A hierarchical cluster analysis (Ward's method) of the IC0005 value for each of the five opioids was performed to identify subgroups of countries with similar reported risks of opioid abuse and dependence. Results: Among 21 countries, the optimal number of clusters was calculated to be four, each with a Jaccard index >0.5 (0.95, 0.78, 0.65 and 0.75, respectively). Six countries with the highest signals of drug abuse and dependence were identified in cluster 1, with significant CIs for the five opioids of interest (IC0005 > 0), ranging from 0.9 to 5.8 for the lower endpoint. Conclusions: There appear to be four distinct clusters of countries with similar opioid abuse and dependence profiles. The group with the highest reported risk for the opioids oxycodone, fentanyl, morphine, tramadol and codeine includes Australia, Canada, France, Germans, the United Kingdom and the United States. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Since the appearance of zolpidem on the market, the occurrence of serious cases of abuse, misuse and dependence have come to the attention of authorities. In view of the increase in the number and severity of cases among zolpidem users and the predominant presence of zolpidem in falsified prescriptions, the French Health Authorities implemented part of the narcotics regulation for zolpidem in April 2017. The objective of this article was to describe the evolution of the abuse, dependence and misuse of zolpidem. Methods We used three data sources: (i) zolpidem is a reimbursable and strictly prescription drug in France. Medic'AM is a public database that indicates the number of tablets reimbursed each month in France for each reimbursable drug. This database has been analyzed as a proxy of the exposure of the French population to zolpidem; (ii) all French cases of drug dependence or abuse reported by health professionals (regulatory obligation) and (iii) an epidemiological tool based on the surveillance of falsified prescriptions over two periods: the 3-year period before the regulatory measure (2014–16) and the 3-year period after the regulatory measure (2018–20). Results This regulatory change had two immediate consequences: a sharp decline in falsified prescriptions and a decrease of ∼57% between the two study periods in the zolpidem reimbursement data. Markers of problematic consumption remained after the regulatory change with worsening cases, particularly for people who were genuinely dependent and/or had comorbidities or misusers for whom zolpidem was the substance of interest, whose proportion increased significantly in the addictovigilance notification system, from 43.6% (N  = 107) to 59.3% (N  = 127) (P  < 0.01). Conclusions Further monitoring is needed in light of these persistent markers of problematic consumption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The French Ministry of Health scheduled opioid cough suppressants as prescription‐only drugs on 12 July 2017. The present study assessed the impact of this regulation on the diversion modalities of the concerned drugs and the related drug pholcodine by analysing the national OSIAP (Ordonnances Suspectes Indicateur d'Abus Possible) database. Methods: Medical prescriptions with at least 1 mention of codeine, dextromethorphan, ethylmorphine, noscapine or pholcodine for cough suppression recorded in 2013–2019 were extracted from OSIAP. Annual mentioning rates were estimated by dividing numbers of mentions over those of prescriptions recorded the year considered. A descriptive analysis compared the characteristics of prescriptions before and after 12 July 2017. Results: Overall, 832 mentions of the requested drugs were retrieved on 827 prescription forms. Codeine was the most frequent (n = 809, 8.7%) with 6 additional mentions of codeine/ethylmorphine combination, followed by dextromethorphan (n = 11, 0.1%) and pholcodine (n = 6, 0.1%). There was no mention of noscapine. Annual mentioning rates varied between 0 and 0.3% for all drugs except codeine. Codeine mentioning rates ranged between 0.3% (n = 2) and 0.7% (n = 9) before 12 July 2017 and increased to 10.1% (n = 61) thereafter in 2017, 16.1% (n = 314) in 2018, and 19.8% (n = 414) in 2019. The profile of subjects evolved accordingly with an increased male/female ratio (10.0 vs. 1.5 before) and decreased age (23 vs. 40 y before, P <.001). Discussion: The sharp increase of recourse to falsified prescription forms indicates that codeine diversion continues despite restricted access, whereas the other drugs studied do not seem to have been impacted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To describe the adverse events (AEs) of recreational cannabis use in France between 2012 and 2017. Methods: AEs related to recreational cannabis use, alone or in combination with alcohol and/or tobacco reported to the French Addictovigilance Network were analysed (excluding cannabidiol and synthetic cannabinoids). Results: Reporting of AEs tripled between 2012 (n = 179, 6.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.4–7.2) and 2017 (n = 562, 10.1%, 95% CI = 9.3–10.9), reaching 2217 cases. They concerned mainly men (76.4%) and users aged between 18 and 34 years (18–25: 30.9%; 26–34: 26.3%, range: 12–84 years). Cannabis was mainly inhaled (71.6%) and exposure was most often chronic (64.2%). Many types of AEs were reported: psychiatric (51.2%), neurological (15.6%), cardiac (7.8%) and gastrointestinal (7.7%), including unexpected AEs (n = 34, 1.1%). The most common effect was dependence, ranging from 10.1% (95% CI = 7.9–12.3) to 20.3% (95% CI = 17.3–23.2) over the study period. Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (n = 87, 2.8%) emerged from 2015. Deaths accounted for 0.2% of all AEs (4 men and 3 women aged on average 35 years). A chronic pattern of cannabis use was reported in 4 of them (intracranial hypertension in the context of lung cancer, suicide, cerebral haematoma, neonatal death with concomitant chronic alcohol use), while in the other cases the toxicological analysis identified cannabis use (ruptured aneurysm and unknown aetiology). Conclusion: This study showed a multitude of AEs related to recreational cannabis use, including unexpected AEs and deaths. It highlights the problem of dependence and the emergence of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]