Search

[Abstract] The aim of this study is to analyze the effectiveness and safety of direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) in psychiatric patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). Secondary objectives included adherence and drug‐drug interaction (DDIs) evaluations. Prospective observational comparative study carried out during 3 years. Psychiatric patients were included and mental illness classified by a psychiatric team based on clinical records. Main effectiveness and safety variables were sustained virologic response (SVR) at posttreatment week 12 (SVR12) and rate of on‐treatment serious drug‐related adverse events (AEs), respectively. A total of 242 psychiatric and 900 nonpsychiatric patients were included. SVR12 by intention‐to‐treat (ITT) analysis of psychiatric vs nonpsychiatric patients was 92.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.1‐96.1) vs 96.2% (95% CI, 94.9‐97.5) (P = .02). SVR12 by modified‐ITT analysis was 97.8% (95% CI, 95.0‐99.3) vs 98.4% (95% CI, 97.5‐99.3) (P = .74). 92.2% of psychiatric patients with mental disorders secondary to multiple drug use (MDSDU) and 93.0% of psychiatric patients without MDSDU vs 96.2% of nonpsychiatric patients reached SVR12 (P = .05 and P = .20, respectively). The percentage of adherent patients to DAAs did not show differences between cohorts (P = .08). 30.2% of psychiatric patients and 27.6% of nonpsychiatric patients presented clinically relevant DDIs (P = .47). 1.7% vs 0.8% of psychiatric vs nonpsychiatric patients developed serious AEs (P = .39); no serious psychiatric AEs were present. DAAs have shown a slightly lower effectiveness in psychiatric patients with CHC, as a result of loss of follow up, which justifies the need for integrated and multidisciplinary health care teams. DAAs safety, adherence, and DDIs, however, are similar to that of nonpsychiatric patients.

Introduction Although cardiac stress testing may help establish the safety of early discharge in patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes and negative troponins, more cost-effective strategies are necessary. We aimed to develop a clinical prediction rule to safely obviate the need for cardiac stress testing in this setting. Methods A decision rule was derived in a prospective cohort of 3001 patients with acute chest pain and negative troponins, and validated in a set of 1473 subjects. The primary end point was a composite of positive cardiac stress testing (in the absence of a subsequent negative coronary angiogram), positive coronary angiography, or any major coronary events within 3 months. Results A score chart was built based on 7 variables: male sex (+2), age (+1 per decade from the fifth decade), diabetes mellitus (+2), hypercholesterolemia (+1), prior coronary revascularization (+2), type of chest pain (typical angina, +5; non-specific chest pain, −3), and non-diagnostic repolarization abnormalities (+2). In the validation set, the model showed good discrimination ( c statistic=0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.87) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, P = .34). If stress tests were avoided in patients in the validation sample with a sum score of 0 or lower, the number of referrals would be reduced by 23.4%, yielding a negative predictive value of 98.8% (95% confidence interval, 97.0%-99.7%). Conclusion This novel prediction rule based on a combination of readily available clinical characteristics may be a valuable tool to decide whether stress testing can be reliably avoided in patients with acute chest pain and negative troponins.

Recommendations for testing in patients with low pretest probability of coronary artery disease differ in guidelines from no testing at all to different tests. The aim of this study was to assess the value of exercise echocardiography (ExE) to define outcome in this population.A retrospective analysis was conducted of 1,436 patients with low pretest probability of coronary artery disease (15%) who underwent initial ExE. Overall mortality, major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction, and revascularization during follow-up, were assessed. Ischemia (development of new wall motion abnormalities with exercise) and fixed wall motion abnormalities were measured.The mean age was 50 ± 12 years. Resting wall motion abnormalities were seen in 13 patients (0.9%) and ischemia in 108 (7.5%). During follow-up, 38 patients died, 10 of cardiac death (annualized death rate, 0.39%); 20 patients had MACEs (annualized MACE rate, 0.21%); and 48 patients (29 with ischemia) underwent revascularization (annualized revascularization rate, 0.51%). The number and percentage of MACEs in the abnormal and normal ExE groups were similar (two [1.7%] vs 18 [1.4%], P = .70), as was the annualized MACE rate (0.31% vs 0.21%, P = .50). Peak left ventricular ejection fraction exhibited a nonsignificant trend for predicting MACEs (P = .11). The number of studies needed to detect an abnormal finding was 12.6 and to detect a patient with extensive ischemia was 26.1.ExE offers limited prognostic information in patients with low pretest probability of coronary artery disease. The small number of abnormal findings on ExE and low event rates and the large number of studies needed to detect an abnormal finding limit further the value of imaging in this population.

Objective: Symptoms may be similar in patients with heart or lung disease. Thus, patients with lung disease are occasionally referred for evaluation by exercise echocardiography (ExE). We aimed to study the clinical, ExE data and outcome of patients with right ventricular (RV) dilation not explained by left ventricular (LV) heart disease. Methods: Retrospective analysis of RV dysfunctional data in absence of LV heart disease in patients submitted to an ExE. Results: Data on RV dilation in absence of LV heart disease were found in 21 of 18,400 ExE studies (0.11%). In 4 of the 21 patients (19%) RV function and systolic pulmonary artery pressure were normal at rest. However, exercise induced RV dysfunction and/or elevated systolic pulmonary artery pressure in all of these 4 patients. During follow-up of 5.2 ± 5.7 years 11 patients died (52%), most of them of respiratory causes (73%), being pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) (38%) the most frequent final diagnosis. Conclusion: RV dysfunction in absence of LV disease is rare among patients referred for ExE. ExE is of value as sometimes abnormalities on RV function arise only with exercise

Background— We sought to identify extensive ischemia on exercise echocardiography (ExE) relative to workload in patients without known coronary artery disease and to investigate whether ExE is useful in predicting outcomes in those with high exercise capacity (≥10 metabolic equivalents [METs]) plus a maximal test (≥85% of their maximal age-predicted heart rate [MAPHR]). Methods and Results— The analysis was performed on 4269 patients who underwent ExE, of whom 3995 achieved ≥85% of their MAPHR. These patients were divided according to the reached workload (P P =0.002, respectively). Ischemia was an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.23–2.89; P =0.004) and major cardiac event (hazard ratio, 2.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.22–4.71; P =0.01). Conclusions— Patients without known coronary artery disease achieving ≥10 METs plus ≥85% of their MAPHR may still have ischemia. However, the low event rates even in those with ischemia limit the usefulness of imaging for assessing outcomes in this group.

To assess the value of the pretest probability (PTP) of coronary artery disease (CAD) for predicting stress testing results and coronary events in patients with acute chest pain and negative troponins.A total of 3527 patients without a history of CAD referred to our chest pain unit with suspected acute coronary syndromes, nondiagnostic ECGs, and negative troponin levels underwent exercise stress testing. PTP was estimated with the CAD consortium prediction rule, and was categorized as low (15%), low-intermediate (15-65%), intermediate-high (66-85%), and high (85%). The endpoints were the presence of signs of inducible myocardial ischemia on stress testing and the occurrence of coronary events within 6 months.The probability of exercise-induced myocardial ischemia was 2.6, 12.6, 42.9, and 82.1% in patients with low, low-intermediate, intermediate-high, and high PTP, respectively (Ptrend0.001). The cumulative rate of coronary events within 6 months was also significantly lower in patients with low PTP of CAD (0.8%) than in those with low-intermediate (6.9%), intermediate-high (32.5%), or high PTP (66.7%) (Ptrend0.001). Per 10% increment in PTP of CAD, the adjusted odds ratios for inducible myocardial ischemia and coronary events within 6 months were, respectively, 1.71 (95% confidence interval: 1.61-1.85) and 1.87 (95% confidence interval: 1.74-2.01).PTP was associated strongly with the likelihood of exercise-induced myocardial ischemia and coronary events in patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes and negative troponins. The yield of stress testing in the subset of patients with low PTP was very low.

Interpretation of the electrocardiogram (ECG) during exercise is not easy in patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB). Also, the value of exercise echocardiography (ExE) for predicting outcome in them has not been addressed. We sought to assess its prognostic value in patients with RBBB and known/suspected coronary disease.Retrospective analysis of data on 703 patients with RBBB who were submitted to a clinically-indicated ExE. The end points were overall mortality and combined myocardial infarction and cardiovascular mortality.During follow-up (4.1 ± 4.5 years) there were 130 deaths and 108 combined events. Independent predictors of combined events were history of coronary artery disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.37, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 1.24-4.52, p = 0.009) resting wall motion score index (HR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.12-4.10, p = 0.02), metabolic equivalents (HR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.93-0.97, p = 0.007), Δ in double product with exercise (HR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.92-1.00, p = 0.036) and Δ in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with exercise (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.94-0.99, p = 0.01). Neither positive clinical nor ECG exercise testing was predictive. Combined event rates were 3.3% in patients with ΔLVEF 5%, 4.7% in those with ΔLVEF between 1-5% and 8.2% in those with no increase (Δ 1%).A decrease in LVEF during exercise is predictive of serious events in patients with RBBB.

Limited data are available on the added value of exercise echocardiography (ExEcho) over exercise electrocardiography (ExECG) in patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes (ACS) referred to a chest pain unit. We aimed to assess the incremental value of ExEcho over ExECG in this setting.ExECG and ExEcho were performed in parallel in 1052 patients with suspected ACS, nondiagnostic but interpretable electrocardiograms, and negative serial troponin results. The primary outcome was a composite of coronary death, nonfatal myocardial infarction or unstable angina with angiographic documentation of significant coronary artery disease within 6 months.The primary outcome occurred in 2/614 patients (0.3%) with both negative ExECG and ExEcho, 3/60 (5%) with positive ExECG and negative ExEcho, 73/135 (54.1%) with negative ExECG and positive ExEcho, 106/136 (77.9%) with both positive ExECG and ExEcho, and 8/107 (7.5%) with inconclusive results. The addition of ExEcho data to a model based on clinical and ExECG data significantly increased the c statistic from 0.898 to 0.968 (change +0.070, 95% confidence interval 0.052-0.092), with a continuous net reclassification improvement of 1.56 and an integrated discrimination improvement of 22% (p0.001). Decision curve analysis showed that a strategy of referral to coronary angiography based on ExEcho was associated with the highest net benefit and with the largest reduction in unnecessary coronary angiographies.ExEcho provides significant incremental prognostic information and higher net clinical benefit than a strategy based on ExECG in patients referred to a chest pain unit for suspected ACS and negative troponin levels.

Introduction and objectives Left ventricular torsion decreases during transmural myocardial ischemia, but the effect of exercise on left ventricular torsion has not been widely studied. We hypothesized that exercise-induced ischemia may impair left ventricular torsion. Therefore, our aim was to study the effects of exercise on left ventricular torsion in patients with an ischemic response to exercise echocardiography and in patients with a normal response. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed in 172 patients with ejection fraction ≥ 50% who were referred for exercise-echocardiography and studied by speckle imaging at rest, peak and postexercise. Torsion was defined as apical rotation – basal rotation (in degrees) / left ventricular length (in centimeters). A total of 114 patients had a normal exercise echocardiography and 58 patients had an ischemic response to exercise echocardiography. Results Patients with ischemic response to the test exhibited less basal rotation at peak exercise (+0.30° [2.39°] vs –0.65° [2.61°] in the normal group; P = .03), whereas peak apical rotation was similar (ischemic response to the test, 7.80° [3.51°]; normal response, 7.27° [3.28°]; P = .36). Torsion at peak exercise was also similar (1.07° [0.60°] in the ischemic response to the test group vs 1.16° [0.57°] in normal group; P = .37). A more impaired peak basal rotation was found in patients with anterior or anterior+posterior involvement (anterior ischemic response, +1.22° [2.45°]; anterior + posterior ischemic response, –0.20° [2.25°]; posterior ischemic response, –0.71° [1.96°]; normal response, –0.65° [2.60°]; P = .02). Conclusions Basal rotation at peak exercise is impaired in patients with an ischemic response to exercise echocardiography, particularly in those with anterior involvement. Apical rotation and torsion are similar to those in patients with normal exercise echocardiography.

Objectives: To identify the prevalence of extensive ischemia on exercise echocardiography (ExE) relative to workload in patients without known coronary artery disease (CAD), and to investigate whether ExE is useful to assess outcome in those with high exercise capacity (≥10 metabolic equivalents (METs) plus a maximal test (≥85% of their Maximal Age-Predicted Heart Rate (MAPHR). Background: Recent work has suggested low reach of imaging in patients who achieve ≥10 METs and ≥85% of their MAPHR during exercise. Methods: Retrospective analysis on 4,269 patients who underwent ExE, of whom 3,995 achieved ≥85% of their MAPHR. These patients were divided according to the reached workload (