Search

Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS) is a hereditary disorder that confers an approximately 90% lifetime risk of cancer and requires comprehensive lifetime cancer screening. We explored healthcare roles for managing LFS-related cancer risks and treatments that were assumed by parents, adolescents, and adult children. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 families. Family groupings were comprised of 2-5 members, with the younger generation in each family ranging in age from 7 to 40 years. Using grounded theory methods, we conducted open and focused coding of interview transcript content. Family members described how the role of health leader was implemented in their family, as well as factors such as maturation of a child or death of a member that determined who assumed particular roles and how these roles shifted over time. They often expressed collective responsibility for helping relatives understand LFS and implement appropriate cancer risk management. Members demonstrated their health role by attending others' medical appointments for support or information gathering. The health leader role was intergenerational and provided the family necessary support in navigating complicated healthcare decisions. Our findings provide insight into healthcare providers regarding how LFS patients and their relatives develop unique medical decision-making and caring roles influenced by the hereditary nature of LFS, and how these roles change over time. Providers who are attuned to family role dynamics may be better able to meet relatives' psychosocial and medical needs by understanding how living with LFS influences the family system's functioning and facilitating members' support for each other.El síndrome de Li-Fraumeni (LFS) es un trastorno hereditario que concede aproximadamente un 90 % de riesgo durante toda la vida de contraer cáncer y exige exámenes completos para la detección del cáncer de por vida. Analizamos los roles sanitarios a la hora de manejar los riesgos y los tratamientos de cáncer relacionados con el LFS que asumieron los padres, los adolescentes y los hijos adultos. Se realizaron entrevistas semiestructuradas con 23 familias. Los agrupamientos familiares estaban compuestos por entre 2 y 5 familiares, donde la edad de la generación más joven de cada familia oscilaba entre 7 y 40 años. Utilizando los métodos de la teoría fundamentada, realizamos una codificación abierta y centrada del contenido de la transcripción de la entrevista. Los miembros de la familia describieron cómo se implementó el rol de jefe de la salud en su familia, así como factores como la maduración de un niño o la muerte de un miembro que determinaron quiénes asumieron roles particulares y cómo estos roles cambiaron con el tiempo. Con frecuencia ellos expresaron la responsabilidad colectiva de ayudar a los familiares a comprender el LFS y a implementar el manejo adecuado del riesgo de contraer cáncer. Los familiares demostraron sus roles sanitarios asistiendo a citas médicas de los demás para recibir apoyo u obtener información. El rol de jefe sanitario fue intergeneracional y proporcionó a la familia el apoyo necesario para manejarse ante decisiones complicadas sobre la asistencia sanitaria. Nuestros resultados brindan información para los prestadores de servicios médicos con respecto a cómo los pacientes de LFS y sus familiares desarrollan roles únicos para la toma de decisiones médicas y el cuidado influenciados por la índole hereditaria del LFS, y cómo estos roles cambian con el tiempo. Es posible que los prestadores que estén acostumbrados a la dinámica de roles familiares sean más capaces de satisfacer las necesidades psicosociales y médicas de los familiares si comprenden cómo vivir con LFS influye en el funcionamiento del sistema familiar y si facilitan el apoyo mutuo de los familiares.李-佛美尼综合症是一种遗传性的疾病，大概一生中有90%的患癌几率，它要求家庭成员终身接受综合性癌症筛查。本文研究医疗保健对管理李-佛美尼综合症风险和治疗过程中所起的作用，这些风险和治疗均由家长，青少年和成年孩子们来承担着。参与研究的家庭有23个，采用半结构化的访谈。家庭的组成有2-5个家庭成员，每个家庭的较年轻一代人年龄跨度7-40岁。使用草根理论方法，我们针对访谈文稿进行了开放式和集中式解码。家庭成员描述了健康领袖的作用在家庭内如何实现的，还有孩子的成熟，某家庭成员的去世等因素，这些因素都决定了谁承担了什么角色，这些角色在一段时间范围内如何发生变化。他们通常会表达集体性的共同责任，帮助亲戚理解LFS症和实施合适的癌症风险管理。家庭成员通过陪同一起去就医来给与支持以及信息搜集的方式来实现他们的健康作用。健康领袖的作用是代际间的，提供了必要的支持给家庭，特别是在复杂的医疗保健方面的决定。我们的研究结果提供了健康医疗供给方的看法，主要是关于LFS病人和他们的亲戚如何作出特殊的医疗决策和发挥照料者的角色，这些都深受LFS遗传性特性的影响，和这些角色如何随着时间而发生变化。那些可以适应家庭角色动态变化的供给方可以较好地实现亲戚的社会心理和医疗的需要，主要是通过尽力理解承受LFS影响的家庭系统的功能，促进家庭成员们彼此的支持。.

Background: Eligibility guidelines for genetic testing may be revisited, given technological advances, plummeting costs, and proposals for population mutation screening. A key property of eligibility criteria is the tradeoff between the number of mutation carriers identified versus population members tested. We assess the fractions of mutation carriers identified, versus women undergoing mutation testing, for BRCA1/2 founder mutation screening in U.S. Ashkenazi-Jewish women. Methods: BRCA1/2 carrier probabilities, based on personal/family history, were calculated using the risk-prediction tool BRCAPRO for 4,589 volunteers (102 mutation carriers) in the population-based Washington Ashkenazi Study. For each carrier-probability threshold between 0% and 10%, we compared the percentage of founder mutations detected versus the percentage of women requiring mutation testing. PCR mutation testing was conducted at the NIH for the 3 Ashkenazi-Jewish founder mutations (5382insC and 185delAG in BRCA1, and 6174delT in BRCA2). Results: Identifying 90% of BRCA1/2 founder mutations required testing the 60% of Ashkenazi-Jewish women with carrier probabilities exceeding 0.56%, potentially avoiding mutation testing for approximately 0.7 to 1.1 million U.S. Ashkenazi-Jewish women. Alternatively, testing the 44% whose carrier probability exceeded 0.78% identified 80% of mutation carriers, increasing to 89% of mutation carriers when accounting for cascade testing triggered after mutation-positive daughters were identified by screening. We present data on all carrier-probability thresholds, e.g., a 5% threshold identified 46% of mutation carriers while testing 10% of women. Conclusions: Different carrier-probability thresholds offered diverse tradeoffs between numbers of identified mutation carriers versus women tested. Low carrier-probability thresholds identified 90% of BRCA1/2 founder mutation carriers, without testing approximately 1 million U.S. Ashkenazi-Jewish women with lowest carrier probabilities. Impact: In general, this risk-based framework could provide useful new options to consider during eligibility-criteria development for population mutation screening.

PURPOSE: Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS) is an inherited tumor predisposition syndrome with lifetime cancer risks approaching 100% and evolving risk-management strategies. This study evaluated couples’ coping with LFS-related burdens. RESEARCH APPROACH: Constructivist grounded theory and anticipatory loss frameworks guided design and analysis. SAMPLE AND METHODS: Twenty-six individuals enrolled in the NCI LFS Family Study completed semi-structured interviews with their partner during annual screening visits. An interdisciplinary team completed open and focused coding to identify patterns of coping and adaptation. FINDINGS: Couples described living with ambiguous danger, a state of chronic apprehension resulting from LFS-associated uncertainties. Most couples communicated openly and alternated shouldering the burden, while others engaged in protective buffering to shield each other from distress and sustain the appearance of normalcy. INTERPRETATION: Optimally, coping reduces shared psychosocial distress, yet some strategies may inadvertently increase disconnection. IMPLICATIONS: Mental health support is critical for both partners coping with LFS, together and separately.

In families with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer, complex disease histories challenge established patterns of family communication and influence decision-making for clinical surveillance, genetic testing, and risk management. An interdisciplinary team examined longitudinal interview data from women with identified BRCA1/2 mutations to assess interactions within family and social networks about risk information communication and management. We used interpretive description to identify motivation, content, and derived benefit of these interactions. Participants discussed risk information and management strategies with biological and nonbiological network members for multiple purposes: discharging responsibility for risk information dissemination, protecting important relationships, and navigating decision trajectories. Evolving interactions with loved ones balanced long-standing family communication patterns with differing personal preferences for privacy or open sharing, whereas interactions with nonbiological network members expanded participants’ range of choices for sources of risk management information. Ongoing assessment of social networks may help support engagement with risk management by aligning with patient social needs.

To define the frequency with which adult research participants consent to be offered clinically validated research genetic test results (RR) and incidental findings (IF). Consents were obtained from 506 adults enrolled in one of three studies within the National Cancer Institute Clinical Genetics Branch’s Familial Cancer Research Program. A cross-sectional analysis was performed involving the choices indicated on study consents regarding receipt of RR and IF. Ninety-seven percent opted to receive RR and IF. Participants who declined (n = 16) included two cancer survivors who were mutation-positive (1 = RR and 1 = both), eight who knew their primary mutation status (3 = RR; 4 = IF; 1 = both), three nonbloodline relatives (1 = RR; 2 = both), one untested but with the syndromic phenotype (1 = IF), and two parents of an affected child (2 = both). We speculate that these individuals either already had sufficient information, were not prepared to learn more, or felt that the information would not change their personal health-care decision making. Adult research participants from families at high genetic risk for cancer overwhelmingly indicated their preference to receive both RR and IF. Future research will seek to identify the reasons for declining RR and IF and to study the impact of receipt of RR and IF on personal medical decision making. Genet Med 18 12, 1218–1225.

BACKGROUND Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is an autosomal dominant cancer predisposition syndrome characterized by a very high lifetime cancer risk and an early age at diagnosis of a wide cancer spectrum. Precise estimates for the risk of first and subsequent cancers are lacking. METHODS The National Cancer Institute's Li-Fraumeni Syndrome Study includes families meeting the diagnostic criteria for LFS or Li-Fraumeni-like syndrome, and individuals with a germline TP53 mutation, choroid plexus carcinoma, adrenocortical carcinoma, or ≥3 cancers. Herein, we estimated the cumulative risk and annual hazards for first and second cancers among TP53 mutation carriers (TP53 positive [TP53+]) using MATLAB statistical software. RESULTS This study evaluated 286 TP53+ individuals from 107 families. The cumulative cancer incidence was 50% by age 31 years among TP53+ females and 46 years among males, and nearly 100% by age 70 years for both sexes. Cancer risk was highest after age 20 years for females, mostly due to breast cancer, whereas among males the risk was higher in childhood and later adulthood. Among females, the cumulative incidence rates by age 70 years for breast cancer, soft tissue sarcoma, brain cancer, and osteosarcoma were 54%, 15%, 6%, and 5%, respectively. Among males, the incidence rates were 22%, 19%, and 11%, respectively, for soft tissue sarcoma, brain cancer, and osteosarcoma. Approximately 49% of those with 1 cancer developed at least another cancer after a median of 10 years. The average age-specific risk of developing a second cancer was comparable to that of developing a first cancer. CONCLUSIONS The cumulative cancer risk in TP53 + individuals was very high and varied by sex, age, and cancer type. Additional work, including prospective risk estimates, is needed to better inform personalized risk management. Cancer 2016;122:3673-81. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

BACKGROUND: Eligibility guidelines for genetic testing may be revisited, given technological advances, plummeting costs, and proposals for population mutation-screening. A key property of eligibility criteria is the tradeoff between the number of mutation-carriers identified versus population-members tested. We assess the fractions of mutation-carriers identified, versus women undergoing mutation-testing, for BRCA1/2 founder-mutation-screening in US Ashkenazi-Jewish women. METHODS: BRCA1/2 carrier-probabilities, based on personal/family history, were calculated using the risk-prediction tool BRCAPRO for 4,589 volunteers (102 mutation-carriers) in the population-based Washington Ashkenazi Study. For each carrier-probability threshold between 0%-10%, we compared the percent of founder-mutations detected vs. the percent of women requiring mutation-testing. PCR mutation-testing was conducted at the NIH for the 3 Ashkenazi-Jewish founder mutations (5382insC and 185delAG in BRCA1, and 6174delT in BRCA2). RESULTS: Identifying 90% of BRCA1/2 founder-mutations required testing the 60% of Ashkenazi-Jewish women with carrier-probabilities exceeding 0.56%, potentially avoiding mutation-testing for approximately 0.7-1.1 million US Ashkenazi-Jewish women. Alternatively, testing the 44% whose carrier-probability exceeded 0.78% identified 80% of mutation-carriers, increasing to 89% of mutation-carriers when accounting for cascade-testing triggered after mutation-positive daughters were identified by screening. We present data on all carrier-probability thresholds; e.g., a 5% threshold identified 46% of mutation-carriers while testing 10% of women. CONCLUSIONS: Different carrier-probability thresholds offered diverse tradeoffs between numbers of identified mutation-carriers versus women tested. Low carrier-probability thresholds identified 90% of BRCA1/2 founder-mutation-carriers, without testing ~1 million US Ashkenazi-Jewish women with lowest carrier-probabilities. IMPACT: In general, this risk-based framework could provide useful new options to consider during eligibility-criteria development for population mutation-screening.

This study presents findings of a mixed-method descriptive exploration of the role of friends and spirituality/religiosity in easing the burden of families with the rare inherited disorder, Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS). LFS is caused by germline mutations in the TP53 gene and is associated with very high lifetime risk of developing one or more malignancies. During the first clinical visit we assessed several types of social support among a subset of study participants (N = 66) using an established interactive research tool called the Colored Eco-Genetic Relationship Map (CEGRM). We performed both quantitative and qualitative analyses of social relationships with LFS family members and close non-kin. Distress scores (N = 59) were mostly low normal, with some outliers. We found that reported friendships varied widely, that the friendships were often deep and enduring, and were important sources of informational, tangible, emotional and spiritual support. Confidantes tended to be best friends and/or spouses. Organized religion was important in selected families, typically from mainstream traditions. However, a number of people identified themselves as "spiritual" and reported spiritual and humanist explorations. Our results shed preliminary light on how some people in families with LFS cope in the face of tremendous medical, social and emotional challenges.

Importance Establishment of an optimal cancer surveillance program is important to reduce cancer-related morbidity and mortality in individuals with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a rare, highly penetrant cancer predisposition syndrome. Objective To determine the feasibility and efficacy of a comprehensive cancer screening regimen in Li-Fraumeni syndrome, using multiple radiologic techniques, including rapid whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and laboratory measurements. Design, Setting, and Participants Baseline evaluation of a prospective cancer screening study was conducted from June 1, 2012, to July 30, 2016, at the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (an academic research facility). Participants included 116 individuals with Li-Fraumeni syndrome with a germline TP53 pathogenic variant who were aged 3 years or older at the time of baseline screening and had not received active cancer therapy at least 6 months prior to screening. Main Outcomes and Measures Detection of prevalent cancer with multimodal screening techniques and the need for additional evaluation. Results Of the 116 study participants, 77 (66.4%) were female; median age was 37.6 years (range, 3-68 years). Baseline cancer screening led to the diagnosis of cancer in 8 (6.9%) individuals (2 lung adenocarcinomas, 1 osteosarcoma, 1 sarcoma, 1 astrocytoma, 1 low-grade glioma, and 2 preinvasive breast cancers [ductal carcinoma in situ]); all but 1 required only resection for definitive treatment. A total of 40 (34.5%) participants required additional studies to further investigate abnormalities identified on screening, with 32 having incidental, benign, or normal findings, resulting in a false-positive rate of 29.6%. Non-MRI techniques, including baseline blood tests, abdominal ultrasonography in children, mammography, and colonoscopy, did not lead to a diagnosis of prevalent cancer in our cohort. Conclusions and Relevance This study describes the establishment and feasibility of an intensive cancer surveillance protocol for individuals with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Prevalent cancers were detected at an early stage with baseline whole-body, brain, and breast MRI. Prospective screening of the participants is under way.

ImportanceThere are limited guidelines for clinical management in Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a multi-organ cancer predisposition condition. Whole body magnetic resonance imaging may play a role in surveillance of this high risk population.ObjectiveTo assess the clinical utility of whole body magnetic resonance imaging in germline TP53 mutation carriers at baseline.Data SourcesClinical and research surveillance cohorts were identified through the Li-Fraumeni Exploration Research Consortium.Study selectionCohorts that incorporated whole body magnetic resonance imaging for individuals with germline TP53 mutations were included.Data extraction and synthesisData was extracted by investigators from each cohort independently and synthesized by two investigators. Random effects meta-analysis methods were used to estimate proportions. Main outcomes and measuresThe proportion of participants at baseline in whom a lesion was detected that required follow up and in whom a new primary malignancy was detected. ResultsA total 578 participants from 13 cohorts were included in the analysis. Two hundred twenty-five lesions requiring clinical follow up were detected by whole body magnetic resonance imaging in 173 participants. Sixty-one lesions were diagnosed in 54 individuals as either benign or malignant neoplasms. Overall, 42 cancers were identified in 39 individuals, with 35 new localized cancers treated with curative intent. The overall detection rate for new localized primary cancers was 7% (95% Confidence Interval 5-9%).Conclusions and relevanceThese data suggest clinical utility in baseline whole body magnetic resonance imaging in TP53 germline mutation carriers, and may form an integral part of baseline clinical risk management in this high-risk population.

Inherited bone marrow failure syndromes (IBMFS) including Fanconi anemia, dyskeratosis congenita, Diamond-Blackfan anemia, and Shwachman-Diamond syndrome are rare genetic disorders characterized by hematologic complications and increased risk of cancer. Patients and their families likely experience obstacles in obtaining sufficient health information given their disorders' rarity. To investigate this possibility, we examined information-seeking behaviors and levels of general and disorder-specific genetic knowledge among 315 members of 174 families with an IBMFS, and how information-seeking behaviors and socio-demographic factors may be associated with their genetic knowledge. Cross-sectional survey data indicated that participants were most likely to have ever used the Internet or healthcare providers for genetic information. On average, participants correctly answered 57 % of items assessing general genetic knowledge and 49-59 % of disorder-specific knowledge items. Greater knowledge was associated with greater education and ever experiencing genetic counseling, attending a scientific meeting, and seeking information from the Internet and scientific literature. Among families with Fanconi anemia (whose family support organization has the longest history of providing information), greater disorder-specific genetic knowledge was also associated with seeking information from support groups and other affected families. Results suggest that families with IBMFS have uncertainty regarding genetic aspects of their disorder, and highlight potential channels for delivering educational resources.

Objectives. Given the importance of the dissemination of accurate family history to assess disease risk, we characterized the gatherers, disseminators, and blockers of health information within families at high genetic risk of cancer. Methods. A total of 5466 personal network members of 183 female participants of the Breast Imaging Study from 124 families with known mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes (associated with high risk of breast, ovarian, and other types of cancer) were identified by using the Colored Eco-Genetic Relationship Map (CEGRM). Hierarchical nonlinear models were fitted to characterize information gatherers, disseminators, and blockers. Results. Gatherers of information were more often female (P < .001), parents (P < .001), and emotional support providers (P < .001). Disseminators were more likely female first- and second- degree relatives (both P < .001), family members in the older or same generation as the participant (P < .001), those with a cancer history (P < .001), and providers of emotional (P < .001) or tangible support (P < .001). Blockers tended to be spouses or partners (P < .001) and male, first-degree relatives (P < .001). Conclusions. Our results provide insight into which family members may, within a family-based intervention, effectively gather family risk information, disseminate information, and encourage discussions regarding shared family risk.

It was our aim to determine baseline levels of testicular cancer and genetics knowledge among members of families with Familial Testicular Cancer (FTC).This is a sub-study of an ongoing National Cancer Institute (NCI) multidisciplinary, etiologically-focused, cross-sectional study of FTC. We evaluated 258 male and female participants including testicular cancer (TC) survivors, blood relatives and spouses to assess factors associated with a Genetic Knowledge Scale (GKS) and Testicular Cancer Knowledge Scale (TCKS).Knowledge levels were generally low, with genetic knowledge lower than TC knowledge (p0.01). Men with a personal TC history scored highest on TC knowledge, while gender, age and education differentially influenced knowledge levels, particularly among unaffected relatives.Prior to identifying FTC susceptibility genes, we recommend tailoring FTC genetic education to the different informational needs of TC survivors, their spouses and relatives, in preparation for the day when clinical susceptibility testing may be available.

Dyskeratosis congenita (DC) is an inherited bone marrow failure syndrome in which the known susceptibility genes (DKC1, TERC, and TERT) belong to the telomere maintenance pathway; patients with DC have very short telomeres. We used multicolor flow fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of median telomere length in total blood leukocytes, granulocytes, lymphocytes, and several lymphocyte subsets to confirm the diagnosis of DC, distinguish patients with DC from unaffected family members, identify clinically silent DC carriers, and discriminate between patients with DC and those with other bone marrow failure disorders. We defined “very short” telomeres as below the first percentile measured among 400 healthy control subjects over the entire age range. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of very short telomeres for DC were more than 90% for total lymphocytes, CD45RA+/CD20− naive T cells, and CD20+ B cells. Granulocyte and total leukocyte assays were not specific; CD45RA− memory T cells and CD57+ NK/NKT were not sensitive. We observed very short telomeres in a clinically normal family member who subsequently developed DC. We propose adding leukocyte subset flow fluorescence in situ hybridization telomere length measurement to the evaluation of patients and families suspected to have DC, because the correct diagnosis will substantially affect patient management.

Complexities abound in the identification and management of families at increased risk for inherited forms of cancer. One of the ways to learn as a profession how best to provide cancer risk counseling (CRC) is to share counseling experiences. Such cases can provide insight into the issues raised by families and ways in which genetic counselors have handled complex situations. Here we describe three CRC cases initially presented at the 1995 American College of Medical Genetics meeting. The first case involves balancing the importance of informing a family of the presence of an inherited cancer syndrome with the family's right “not to know.” The second case illustrates the difficulties in assisting an individual to make medical management decisions in the face of uncertain risk information. The third case describes the complex interactions with a woman before and after her decision to have prophylactic surgery.

The Colored Ecological and Genetic Relational Map (CEGRM) [pronounced see-gram] is a conceptual approach and tool for presenting information about family and nonkin relationships and stories about inherited diseases in a simple, understandable form. It combines information that can be derived from pedigrees, genograms, ecomaps, and social network analysis in a single, or series of, pictorial maps based on colors and shapes. The CEGRM is based on a social systems perspective, particularly emphasizing social exchange and resource theories. The CEGRM should be particularly useful in genetic counseling research with members of suspected cancer-risk families or families with other late-onset inherited diseases. A genetic counseling client comes with a social history and context as well as a genetic one. Client decision-making in terms of reproductive plans, therapeutic intervention, lifestyle behavior and sharing or withholding of genetic information frequently becomes enmeshed with preexisting psycho-social relationships among biological kin, affinal kin (in-laws) and fictive kin (friends who act as family). The CEGRM makes it easier to compare different types of social interactions between the client and his/her significant others and among family members on the same dimensions.

The CEGRM was initially conceived as a simple, concise, visual representation of the social interaction domains of information, tangible services and emotional exchanges (Kenen, R., & Peters, J. (2001). J Genet Counsel, 10, 289-309). A blend of the genetic pedigree, genogram, and ecomap, the CEGRM was developed to facilitate contemporary genetic counseling goals. An exploratory pilot study of 20 subjects showed that it was feasible, comfortable and efficiently accomplished, and that the process was useful both for assessment and as an intervention with study participants (Peters, J. A., Kenen, R., Giusti, R., Loud, J., Weissman, N., & Greene, M. H. (2004). Am J Med Genet Part A, 130A, 258-264). Subsequently, we have extended the CEGRM to 150 women from hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC) families; three different investigators have successfully administered this tool. The preliminary findings from the exploratory study were confirmed in the larger sample. Engaging in the interactive, insight-promoting CEGRM process provides a novel tool for assessing the social context of genetic testing, and helping high-risk women better understand and integrate genetic information into their personal and family identities, health beliefs, and decisions.

The proband was a 55-year-old white female who sought pretest counseling when she learned that her father was a BRCA1 mutation carrier. Her father is 85 years old, in good health, and is a brother of a woman who died as a result of ovarian cancer at the age of 35. He learned his mutation status as a participant in a National Cancer Institute research study of familial breast and ovarian cancer. He encouraged all of his children to enroll onto the study and to consider testing. The proband and her siblings (two sisters ages 40 and 48, and a brother age 38, all unaffected) decided to obtain pretest counseling and consider genetic testing. During pretest counseling, the proband revealed her preference that information related to a positive mutation test, in either herself or her siblings, be withheld from her parents. Her rationale was to protect her father from the guilt of having passed a mutation on to an offspring. She stated that her test results “were her own,” and that she would not disclose results to her relatives, whether she tested negative or positive. She also indicated that she would attempt to influence how her siblings communicated their personal test results within the family, by encouraging them to withhold their results, should they learn that they were mutation carriers. All four siblings chose to be tested and their results were disclosed in individual sessions on the same day. The proband, one sister, and her brother had the same mutation that had been identified in their father; the other sister tested negative. The proband was assured that the research team would preserve the confidentiality of her information. She stated that she clearly understood the implications of her test results for her children, that she would “take care of them,” promising that they would be informed of the test results when it “was appropriate.” The proband’s siblings shared their mutation results with family members in the waiting room following their disclosure session. However, in the presence of several members of the research team, the proband lied to her family members about her test results, informing her family that she had tested negative for the BRCA1 mutation.

Nondirectiveness has been a guiding principle for genetic counseling since the founding of the profession. However, its efficacy and appropriateness in this role have been frequently questioned. A workshop at the 2003 Annual Education Conference of the National Society of Genetic Counselors provided audience participation in a discussion of these issues. Participants presented arguments for and against nondirectiveness as a central ethos. They described complex personal transitions in adapting what they had learned about nondirectiveness during training to the realities of the workplace. There was support for flexible approaches to genetic counseling, with varying adherence to nondirectiveness, based on client and family needs and values, clinical circumstances, and desired counseling outcomes. The discussion supports the use of clinical experience, outcomes research, and the experience of other professions to move beyond nondirectiveness and more accurately identify the theoretical bases that underlie genetic counseling in the variety of circumstances in which it is currently practiced.

As genetic awareness spreads among healthcare providers and the general public, and evidence mounts to show the efficacy of cancer control methods, referrals to cancer genetic counseling services for risk assessment are becoming more common. However, few studies have examined referral patterns to genetics and even less is known about referral uptake to clinical cancer genetic counseling. We investigated outcome of genetics referral in 43 affected women attending a breast cancer treatment program who were referred based on having BRCA mutation carrier risks > or =10%. Within 6 months, of the 36 women we were able to recontact, 13 (36%) came to an appointment at the cancer genetic counseling clinic (Acceptors), 10 (27%) said they intended to come in the future (Intenders), and 13 (36%) said they would not consider genetic counseling (Decliners). Referral uptake was framed by elements of the Transtheoretical model (TTM) to determine if decisional balance scores (DBSs), a summary of an individual's "Pro" and "Con" opinions related to genetic testing, correlated with their decision to follow through. Mean DBS's were strongly negative for the Decliner group (-7.4), weakly negative for the Intender group (-1.1), and positive for the Acceptor group (5.4). The difference in the DBS along the continuum was due more to the mean "Con" score decreasing, rather than the mean "Pro" score increasing. Theoretical frameworks are needed to study adherence to referral for cancer genetic counseling. Stage-based theories may have a role to play.

Purpose: Patients seeking genetic testing for inherited breast cancer risk are typically educated by genetic counselors; however, the growing demand for cancer genetic testing will likely exceed the availability of counselors trained in this area. We compared the effectiveness of counseling alone versus counseling preceded by use of a computer-based decision aid among women referred to genetic counseling for a family or personal history of breast cancer. Methods: We developed and evaluated an interactive computer program that educates women about breast cancer, heredity, and genetic testing. Between May 2000 and September 2002, women at six study sites were randomized into either: Counselor Group (n = 105), who received standard genetic counseling, or Computer Group (n = 106), who used the interactive computer program before counseling. Clients and counselors both evaluated the effectiveness of counseling sessions, and counselors completed additional measures for the Computer Group. Counselors also recorded the duration of each session. Results: Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. Participants and counselors both rated the counseling sessions as highly effective, whether or not the sessions were preceded by computer use. Computer use resulted in significantly shorter counseling sessions among women at low risk for carrying BRCA1/2 mutations. In approximately half of the sessions preceded by clients’ computer use, counselors indicated that clients’ use of the computer program affected the way they used the time, shifting the focus away from basic education toward personal risk and decision-making. Conclusion: This study shows that the interactive computer program “Breast Cancer Risk and Genetic Testing” is a valuable adjunct to genetic counseling. Its use before counseling can shorten counseling sessions and allow counselors to focus more on the clients’ individual risks and specific psychological concerns. As the demand for counseling services increases, a program such as this can play a valuable role in enhancing counseling efficiency.

These cancer genetic counseling recommendations describe the medical, psychosocial, and ethical ramifications of identifying at-risk individuals through cancer risk assessment with or without genetic testing. They were developed by members of the Practice Issues Subcommittee of the National Society of Genetic Counselors Cancer Genetic Counseling Special Interest Group. The information contained in this document is derived from extensive review of the current literature on cancer genetic risk assessment and counseling as well as the personal expertise of genetic counselors specializing in cancer genetics. The recommendations are intended to provide information about the process of genetic counseling and risk assessment for hereditary cancer disorders rather than specific information about individual syndromes. Key components include the intake (medical and family histories), psychosocial assessment (assessment of risk perception), cancer risk assessment (determination and communication of risk), molecular testing for hereditary cancer syndromes (regulations, informed consent, and counseling process), and follow-up considerations. These recommendations should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of management, nor does use of such recommendations guarantee a particular outcome. These recommendations do not displace a health care provider's professional judgment based on the clinical circumstances of a client.

Objective/Hypothesis To determine the heritable proportion of paraganglioma (PGL) and identify clinical features associated with heritable PGL. Study Design Patients diagnosed with head and neck PGLs, identified retrospectively through clinical otolaryngology practices and/or participation in previous PGL research studies, were given a medical and family history questionnaire. Methods Questionnaire information was used to classify participants as having “heritable” or “non-heritable” cases of PGL. Classification of the participants identified through otolaryngology clinics was used to estimate the heritable proportion of PGL. Statistical analysis was performed to identify significant differences in the clinical characteristics of the heritable versus non-heritable groups. Results Among the otolaryngology clinic population, 35% were classified as having heritable PGL. Individuals with heritable PGL were younger on average than those with non-heritable PGL. The majority of non-heritable participants were female, but there was an equal gender ratio among the heritable participants. Individuals diagnosed with a carotid body tumor (CBT) were 5.8 times more likely to be classified as heritable than those diagnosed with PGL at other anatomic locations. Conclusions Approximately 35% of individuals who present to an otolaryngologist with a head and neck PGL have inherited a predisposition for this growth. Among individuals diagnosed with head and neck PGL, those diagnosed with CBT are 5.8 times more likely to have an inherited predisposition than those diagnosed with PGL at other anatomic locations.

This is a report of the experience of several months' ethnographic research by a genetic counselor researcher in a cancer treatment clinic. One goal of the exercise was to directly experience a method of qualitative research known as ethnography, which relies heavily on participant-observation, in an applied clinical setting. Another goal was to explore a previously undescribed research area in the genetic counseling literature, namely, the meaning of cancer and cancer treatment for affected individuals and their support companions. Here we report on a personal account of the experiences of conducting and publishing the research. The preliminary analysis and results of this field experience are published elsewhere (Peters et al. (2001) J Genet Counsel 10(2):151–168.). These initial findings support the feasibility of genetic counselors, who are trained in specific social science methodologies, to conduct qualitative research pertinent to genetic counseling practice.

The cancer genetics consultation and comprehensive breast centers logically go hand in hand. Breast surgeons may be interacting for the first time with a relatively new class of colleagues-genetics professionals, such as medical geneticists and genetic counselors. This article introduces surgical oncologists to the current applications of genetic counseling in oncology practice through the involvement of genetics professionals on interdisciplinary teams, in case conference, at grand rounds and oncology meetings, and through genetic risk assessment, counseling, and possible susceptibility testing. Surgeons interacting with the cancer genetics specialists have critical roles to play in the organization of cancer genetics programs, recognition of patients and families at increased genetic risk, appropriate referrals for genetic counseling and testing, and management of high-risk families.

They also provide supportive counseling to those whoalready have an affected child or family member.Genetic counseling is sometimes compared with discussions withpatients about genetic conditions, which occur in many medical set-tings. Most physicians and nurses provide some amount of geneticinformation in response to their patients’ queries, but this is in sharpcontrast to the lengthy process of assessing and addressing hereditaryrisks in an individual or family as carried out by trained, dedicatedgenetic professionals. Yet, despite the extensive clinical care and com-mitment that genetic counselors give their clients, there remain manyunknowns about the effectiveness and efficacy of genetic counseling.

BACKGROUND Cross-cultural genetic counseling was provided to an extended Navajo Indian family in which the MLH1 gene mutation for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) had been identified. The family had been observed by the authors since 1983 and over the years had been provided with intensive education regarding the natural history of HNPCC as well as recommendations for cancer surveillance and management that was responsive to this natural history. METHODS Following identification of the MLH1 mutation, DNA from family members was evaluated by a reference laboratory (OncorMed, Gaithersburg, MD), where sequences were checked in both the forward and reverse directions against the published sequence for MLH1. The 4bp deletion beginning at the first nucleotide of codon 727 was easily visualized in the heterozygous condition in both affected and predispositional individuals. The family was reeducated as a group and then provided further education individually during genetic counseling sessions, at which time they were appraised of potential penalties, such as insurance and employer discrimination, and psychological sequelae that could result from knowledge of the MLH1 mutation. Strict confidentiality of this information was assured. RESULTS DNA testing was performed on 51 family members. Twenty-three individuals were counseled, seven of whom were positive for MLH1. Reactions ranged from full acceptance of the genetic implications to traditional Navajo reasoning such as the family had been cursed. CONCLUSIONS DNA-based genetic counseling requires compassion and empathy, coupled with intensive preeducation regarding potential penalties and advantages that might emanate from this knowledge. Special care must be given to patients' culture, beliefs, and traditions.Cancer 1996;77:30-5.

Background: Li Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS) is an autosomal dominant cancer predisposition syndrome in which about 90% of individuals develop cancer by age 60. Approximately 70% of individuals with LFS have germline TP53 mutation. We hypothesized that this high level of cancer risk may be associated with increased emotional distress, cancer risk perceptions and cancer worry in individuals from LFS families. Methods: Data from 276 adult (≥18 years old) TP53 mutation carriers (TP53+), mutation negative (TP53-) and untested (UT) participants enrolled in an IRB-approved study at the Clinical Genetics Branch, NCI were obtained between January 2011 and June 2014.. Using questionnaires at baseline, we assessed emotional distress (global distress, somatization, anxiety and depression) as measured by the BSI-18, cancer risk perceptions (comparative: scores 1-5; 1 = much less than other people your age to 5 = much more than other people your age and absolute: 10-point scale; 1 = no chance; 5 = may or may not; 10 = almost certainly) and cancer worry scales (frequency of cancer thoughts, interference with mood and daily activity, scores 1-4; = not at all or rarely to 4 = several times a day). Results: TP53+ estimated their comparative lifetime risk of cancer as higher than TP53- and UT; [4.9 (SD = 0.5) vs. 3.8 (SD = 1) and 3.2 (SD = 1.3) p Conclusions: Participants in the LFSS do not demonstrate high levels of emotional distress. TP53+ appropriately identify their comparative and absolute cancer risk as high, but have levels of cancer worry that appears to be only slightly affecting their mood or ability to perform daily activities. Future research will focus on longitudinal changes in risk perception, cancer worry and emotional well-being while enrolled in a cancer screening study. Citation Format: Jennifer T. Loud, Renee C. Bremer, Rosamma Decastro, June A. Peters, Phuong L. Mai, Sharon A. Savage. Psychosocial functioning in research participants at enrollment in a Li-Fraumeni syndrome study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 3473.

1526Background: Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a rare autosomal dominant cancer predisposition syndrome primarily caused by germline TP53 mutations. LFS is associated with very high lifetime cancer risk and early onset of a wide range of cancers. Cancer surveillance is challenging given the tumor spectrum, although an MRI-based regimen has shown promise. An important aim of NCI’s LFS cohort study (NCT01443468) is to establish an effective cancer-screening regimen. Methods: Individuals with a germline TP53 mutation were eligible for screening with annual rapid sequence whole-body (WB) MRI, brain MRI, and breast MRI if applicable, colonoscopy every 3 years, and blood tests every 4 months; children < 17 years also have abdominal ultrasound every 4 months. Here we report the findings at baseline screening of the first 100 participants. Results: Twenty of the 100 WB MRIs had abnormalities requiring additional imaging. Subsequent biopsies in 3 individuals led to the diagnosis of 1 stage Ib lung cancer and 1 oste...

Background Testicular cancer, while rare compared with other adult solid tumors, is the most common cancer in young men in northern Europe and North America. Risk factors include white race, positive family history, contralateral testicular cancer, cryptorchidism, infertility and testicular microlithiasis. As the genetic causes of familial clusters (Familial Testicular Cancer or FTC) are being sought, it is also important to understand the psycho-social experiences of members of FTC families. Methods This is a cross-sectional examination via the Colored Eco-Genetic Relationship Map (CEGRM) of social connections reported by 49 men in FTC families participating in NCI research study 02-C-178. Results The CEGRM was acceptable and feasible for use with men in FTC families, and valuable in understanding their social connections. These men have largely adjusted to the TC history in themselves and/or their relatives. They have considerable social and emotional support from family and friends, although there is wide variability in sources and types. Conclusions The CEGRM focuses on men's social connections and close emotional bonds in FTC families. This action-oriented process of placing colored symbols on significant relationships uncovered previously under-appreciated emotions accompanying men's social exchanges. Most men in FTC families succeed in re-establishing a sense of normalcy in their lives and social connections, in the aftermath of a testicular cancer diagnosis.

Utilizing a case report, this paper explores psychosocial aspects of suicidal intent in a woman seeking prenatal diagnosis. Using knowledge and practice of appropriate assessment, referral, and intervention procedures, the therapy team of genetic counselor and psychotherapist facilitated successful identification and management of this potentially suicidal client. The main counseling goals for the genetic counselor are to assess the situation adequately, decrease the immediate danger, and, with supervision and/or consultation, stabilize the seriously suicidal person until that individual can be triaged to mental health or medical professionals for treatment. The prevalence of suicide issues in genetic counseling contexts is unknown and reports mentioning suicidal ideation unusual in the genetic counseling literature. Is this reported case a rarity among genetic counseling referrals? Systematically collected information on the prevalence and resolution of suicidal issues in genetic counseling contexts would be helpful for those setting curricula for genetic counseling training programs, standards for professional certification exams, and policy and procedures manuals for clinical units.

Updated from their original publication in 2004, these cancer genetic counseling recommendations describe the medical, psychosocial, and ethical ramifications of counseling at-risk individuals through genetic cancer risk assessment with or without genetic testing. They were developed by members of the Practice Issues Subcommittee of the National Society of Genetic Counselors Familial Cancer Risk Counseling Special Interest Group. The information contained in this document is derived from extensive review of the current literature on cancer genetic risk assessment and counseling as well as the personal expertise of genetic counselors specializing in cancer genetics. The recommendations are intended to provide information about the process of genetic counseling and risk assessment for hereditary cancer disorders rather than specific information about individual syndromes. Essential components include the intake, cancer risk assessment, genetic testing for an inherited cancer syndrome, informed consent, disclosure of genetic test results, and psychosocial assessment. These recommendations should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of management, nor does use of such recommendations guarantee a particular outcome. These recommendations do not displace a health care provider’s professional judgment based on the clinical circumstances of a client.

Fanconi anaemia (FA), dyskeratosis congenita (DC), Diamond-Blackfan anaemia (DBA), and Shwachman-Diamond syndrome (SDS) comprise major inherited bone marrow failure syndromes (IBMFS). Adverse events include severe bone marrow failure (BMF), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), and solid tumours (ST). The natural history of FA is well characterised; hazard rates in the other syndromes have not yet been quantified. An open cohort was established at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in 2002. Patients enrolled prior to December, 2007 were followed up to December, 2008. Diagnoses were confirmed with standard tests. Age-associated risks of adverse events were calculated. Most patients in each syndrome survived to young adulthood. Patients with FA had earlier onset of cancers, need for stem cell transplant, and death; followed by DC; DBA and SDS were mildest. While FA and DC patients had markedly increased risks of cancer, AML and MDS, there were no cases of leukaemia in DBA or SDS patients. The NCI cohort provides the first direct quantitative comparison of timing and magnitude of cancer risk in the IBMFS. The findings demonstrate that both FA and DC are major cancer susceptibility syndromes. The IBMFS, historically considered paediatric disorders, have important management implications for physicians treating adult patients.

Familial aggregations of testicular germ cell tumor (FTGCT) have been well described, suggesting the existence of a hereditary TGCT subset. Approximately 1.4% of newly diagnosed TGCT patients report a positive family history of TGCT. Sons and siblings of TGCT patients have four- to sixfold and eight- to tenfold increases in TGCT risk respectively. Segregation analyses suggest an autosomal recessive mode of inheritance. Linkage analyses have identified several genomic regions of modest interest, although no high-penetrance cancer susceptibility gene has been mapped yet. These data suggest that the combined effects of multiple common alleles, each conferring modest risk, might underlie familial testicular cancer. Families display a mild phenotype: the most common number of affected families is 2. Age at diagnosis is 2–3 years younger for familial versus sporadic cases. The ratio of familial seminoma to nonseminoma is 1.0. FTGCT is more likely to be bilateral than sporadic TGCT. This syndrome is cancer site specific. Testicular microlithiasis is a newly recognized FTGCT component. Candidate gene-association studies have implicated the Y chromosome gr/gr deletion and PDE11A gene mutations as genetic modifiers of FTGCT risk. Two genomewide association studies of predominantly sporadic but also familial cases of TGCT have implicated the KIT-ligand, SPRY4, and BAK1 genes as TGCT risk modifiers. All five loci are involved in normal testicular development and/or male infertility. These genetic data provide a novel insight into the genetic basis of FTGCT, and an invaluable guide to future TGCT research.

Background Ductal lavage (DL) has been proposed as a minimally-invasive, well-tolerated tool for obtaining breast epithelial cells for cytological evaluation of breast cancer risk. We report DL tolerability in BRCA1/2 mutation-positive and -negative women from an IRB-approved research study. Methods 165 BRCA1/2 mutation-positive, 26 mutation-negative and 3 mutation unknown women underwent mammography, breast MRI and DL. Psychological well-being and perceptions of pain were obtained before and after DL, and compared with pain experienced during other screening procedures. Results The average anticipated and experienced discomfort rating for DL, 47 and 48 (0–100), were significantly higher (p < 0.01) than the anticipated and experienced discomfort of mammogram (38 and 34), MRI (36 and 25) or nipple aspiration (42 and 27). Women with greater pre-existing emotional distress experienced more DL-related discomfort than they anticipated. Women reporting DL-related pain as worse than expected were nearly three times more likely to refuse subsequent DL than those reporting it as the same or better than expected. Twenty-five percent of participants refused repeat DL at first annual follow-up. Conclusion DL was anticipated to be and experienced as more uncomfortable than other procedures used in breast cancer screening. Higher underlying psychological distress was associated with decreased DL tolerability.

Background The lifetime testicular cancer (TC) risk in the general population is relatively low (~1 in 250), but men with a family history of TC are at 4 to 9 times greater risk than those without. Some health and professional organizations recommend consideration of testicular self-examination (TSE) for certain high-risk groups (e.g. men with a family history of TC). Yet little is known about factors associated with TSE behaviors in this at-risk group. Methods We collected information on this subject during an on-going NCI multidisciplinary, etiologically-focused, cross-sectional Familial Testicular Cancer (FTC) study. We present the first report specifically targeting TSE behaviors among first- and second-degree relatives (n = 99) of affected men from families with ≥ 2 TC cases. Demographic, medical, knowledge, health belief, and psychological factors consistent with the Health Belief Model (HBM) were evaluated as variables related to TSE behavior, using chi-square tests of association for categorical variables, and t-tests for continuous variables. Results For men in our sample, 46% (n = 46) reported performing TSE regularly and 51% (n = 50) reported not regularly performing TSE. Factors associated (p < .05) with regularly performing TSE in multivariate analysis were physician recommendation and testicular cancer worry. This is the first study to examine TSE in unaffected men from FTC families. Conclusion The findings suggest that, even in this high-risk setting, TSE practices are sub-optimal. Our data provide a basis for further exploring psychosocial issues that are specific to men with a family history of TC, and formulating intervention strategies aimed at improving adherence to TSE guidelines.

Ethical assessments of clinical decisions are typically based on the preferences and interests of the individual patient. However, some clinical interventions, such as genetic testing or organ donation, may involve multiple family members. In these cases, one family member may have the potential to benefit, while another family member is exposed to potential physical or psychological risk. In the research setting, the balancing of benefits and risks between family members may be further complicated by uncertainty about their magnitude and likelihood. In addition, when the individual facing these apparently uncompensated risks is a child, the situation becomes particularly ethically complicated, as we appreciated in a recent case. Investigators at the National Cancer Institute were faced with a decision about whether it would be appropriate to disclose apparently "unwanted" research test results (length of telomeres in leukocyte subsets) to an adolescent about risk of future disease (dyskeratosis congenita), possibly causing psychological harm and an ethical wrong. These issues were not expected at the outset of the family's study participation but rather emerged with new data about the research tests. Disclosure of the research finding was an important consideration in order to avoid using the adolescent as a stem-cell donor for his sister. Disclosure to the adolescent could not be justified by merely considering the immediate interests and preferences of the adolescent. However, an expanded ethical analysis that considers the adolescent's familial context offers a more complete picture of the adolescent's interests and preferences which provides justification for disclosure.

Background When women from families with a known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation test negative for the family mutation, it is assumed that they will transition their personal cancer risk perception from high to average risk. However, there are scant data regarding the experience of mutation-negative women after genetic testing disclosure, particularly related to the shift of risk perception from assumed mutation-positive to actual mutation-negative. This study was designed to explore cancer risk perception and the experience of being a mutation-negative woman within a known BRCA1/2 mutation-positive family. Methods We employed a qualitative descriptive design and convened a sample of 13 women who contributed in-depth, semi-structured telephone interviews (audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim) and performed qualitative content analysis with NVivo 2.0 software. Results Six major content areas emerged from interview data: (i) rationale for initial involvement in the breast imaging study, (ii) rationale for continued participation, (iii) experience of living in a multiple-case family, (iv) risk perception: the personal meaning of mutation-negative status, (v) opinions regarding cancer aetiology and (vi) communication patterns between mutation-negative and mutation-positive family members. Conclusions Living in a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer family is a complex experience that affects cognitive, emotional and social functioning. Our findings indicate that mutation-negative women may have unmet psychosocial needs that must be addressed by health-care professionals, particularly in the primary-care setting following genetic disclosure of a potentially reassuring result regarding their lack of the very high cancer risks associated with BRCA1/2 mutations.

Objective: We investigated the association between psychological distress and indices of social integration and communal coping among sisters from hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) families. Sample and methods: Sixty-five sisters from 31 HBOC families completed the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 and the Colored Eco-Genetic Relationship Map, which identified members of participants’ social support networks. Hierarchical linear models were used for all analyses to account for the clustering of sisters within families. Results: Intra-family correlation coefficients suggested that sisters shared perceptions of breast cancer risk and worry, but not ovarian cancer risk and worry. Further, sisters demonstrated shared levels of anxiety and somatization, but not depressive symptoms. Communal coping indices quantifying shared support resources were negatively related to anxiety and somatization. The number of persons with whom cancer risk information was shared exhibited a positive trend with somatization. Social integration, as measured by the size of participants’ emotional support network, was negatively associated with anxiety. Lower depression scores were observed among participants with more persons playing multiple support roles and fewer persons providing tangible assistance. Conclusion: Understanding how support relationships impact well-being among persons adjusting to HBOC risk, and the particular role of family in that process, will facilitate developing appropriate management approaches to help cancer-prone families adjust to their cancer risk. Published in 2008 by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

BRCA1/2-positive women who learn their mutation status early in the life-course face unique challenges related to navigating the tasks of young adulthood. Using qualitative methods and grounded theory, the authors analyzed in-depth interviews with 11 women aged 26 to 35 who learned their mutation status before marriage. Their narratives illustrate the complexity of relationship formation, and highlight the potential for relationship-bonding and intimacy-building in the course of sharing mutation information. Disclosing BRCA mutation status to dating partners is often preceded by feelings of fear and anxiety, yet many participants reported that doing so has positive effects on relationships. Partners' abilities to respond with interest, empathy, and affection are associated with in creased future intimacy, consistent with generally accepted principles within the family/couple systems field. Individual cancer risk perception and familial cancer experiences may affect the disclosure experience, which can be understood via Attachment Theory. Our findings provide clinical insight, identify new areas for research, and suggest ways to assist this unique population in their adjustment to being BRCA mutation-positive.

Testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) is the most common malignancy in young men. Familial clustering, epidemiologic evidence of increased risk with family or personal history, and the association of TGCT with congenital genitourinary tract anomalies suggest an underlying genetic predisposition ([1][1

Background Germ-cell testicular cancer has not been definitively linked to any known hereditary cancer susceptibility disorder. Familial testicular cancer in the presence of other findings in affected and unaffected family members might indicate a previously-unidentified hereditary cancer syndrome. Case presentation The patient was diagnosed with a left testicular seminoma at age 28, and treated with left orchiectomy followed by adjuvant cobalt radiation. His family history is significant for testicular seminoma in his son, bladder cancer in his sister, and lipomatosis in his father. His evaluation as part of an etiologic study of familial testicular cancer revealed multiple colon polyps (adenomatous, hyperplastic, and hamartomatous) first found in his 50 s, multiple lipomas, multiple hyperpigmented skin lesions, left kidney cancer diagnosed at age 64, and a growth-hormone producing pituitary adenoma with associated acromegaly diagnosed at age 64. The patient underwent genetic testing for Cowden syndrome (PTEN gene), Carney complex (PRKAR1A gene), and multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 1 (MEN1 gene); no deleterious mutations were identified. Discussion The constellation of benign and malignant neoplasms in the context of this patient's familial testicular cancer raised the possibility that these might be manifestations of a known hereditary susceptibility cancer syndrome; however, genetic testing for the three syndromes that were most likely to explain these findings did not show any mutation. Alternatively, this family's phenotype might represent a novel neoplasm susceptibility disorder. This possibility cannot be evaluated definitively on the basis of a single case report; additional observations and studies are necessary to investigate this hypothesis further.

Purpose: This study is part of an ongoing National Cancer Institute multidisciplinary, etiologically-focused, cross-sectional study of Familial Testicular Cancer (FTC). The current report targets interest in clinical genetic testing for susceptibility to FTC. Methods: Demographics, knowledge, health beliefs, and psychological and social factors were evaluated as covariates related to interest in genetic testing. Results: The majority (66%) of 229 participants (64 affected men, 66 unaffected men, and 99 women) from 47 multiple-case FTC families expressed interest in having a genetic test within 6 months, should such a test become available. Interest was similar among the three subgroups mentioned above. Worries about insurance discrimination based on genetic test results were associated with a significantly lower interest in testing. Alternatively, participants were more likely to be interested in genetic testing if they were younger and had higher levels of family support, a physician's recommendation supporting testing, cancer distress, and a need for information to inform the health care of their children. Conclusions: This study reveals social and relationship factors that FTC survivors and their relatives considered important when contemplating the use of new genetic technologies. This is the first study describing hypothetical interest in genetic testing for familial testicular cancer.

We report here the results of an exploratory feasibility study of the colored eco-genetic relationship map (CEGRM), a novel, recently-developed psychosocial assessment tool, which incorporates features of the genetic pedigree, family systems genogram, and ecomap. The CEGRM presents a simple, concise, visual representation of the social interaction domains of information, services, and emotional support through the application of color-coded symbols to the genetic pedigree. The interactive process of completing the CEGRM was designed to facilitate contemporary genetic counseling goals of: (a) understanding the client in the context of her/his social milieu; (b) bolstering client self-awareness and insight; (c) fostering active client participation and mutuality in the counseling interaction; (d) eliciting illuminating social narratives; and (e) addressing outstanding emotional issues. Twenty women participating in a breast imaging study of women from families with BRCA1/2 mutations completed and evaluated various aspects of the CEGRM. We found that efficient construction of the CEGRM was feasible, and that compliance was excellent. Participants developed insights into their social milieu through observing the visual pattern of relationships illustrated by the CEGRM. The process of co-constructing the CEGRM fostered the participant's active involvement in the session, marked by mutuality and increased empathy. In this clinical research context, the participants felt free to share poignant stories about their friends and families. Further studies are planned to refine the CEGRM and to examine its utility in cancer genetics research.

Women at increased risk of breast cancer have important opportunities for early detection and prevention. There are, however, serious drawbacks to the available interventions. The magnitude of breast cancer risk is a crucial factor in the optimization of medical benefit when considering the efficacy of risk-reduction methods, the adverse effects of intervention, and economic and quality-of-life outcomes. Breast cancer risk assessment has become increasingly quantitative and is amenable to computerization. The assembly of risk factor information into practical, quantitative models for clinical and scientific use is relatively advanced for breast cancer, and represents a paradigm for broader risk management in medicine. Using a case-based approach, we will summarize the major breast cancer risk assessment models, compare and contrast their utility, and illustrate the role of genetic testing in risk management. Important considerations relevant to clinical oncology practice include the role of risk assessment in cancer prevention, the logistics of implementing risk assessment, the ramifications of conveying risk information with limited genetic counseling, and the mechanisms for genetics referral. Medical professionals can embrace new preventive medicine techniques more effectively by utilizing quantitative methods to assess their patients' risks.

Genetics technologies, methods, and discoveries are being integrated rapidly into medical and nursing practices in a variety of ways. The purpose of this article is to familiarize nurses with how new genetic technologies and discoveries are being incorporated into various phases of clinical oncology practice. The scope of this article is broad to provide an overview of the of ways in which cancer prevention, surveillance, diagnosis, prognosis, monitoring, treatment, and gene therapy are evolving due to advances in the molecular biology of cancer. We use specific examples to demonstrate the use of genetic information to achieve these objectives and to illustrate principles and strategies that may be applied to a variety of cancers.