Search

Background: Self-reported functional capacity measures have an uncertain role in the pre-operative cardiovascular risk stratification., Aim: This substudy aimed to evaluate whether self-reported metabolic equivalent (MET) could improve the prediction of postoperative myocardial injury (MI) over other well-established cardiovascular risk factors., Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of an international multicenter prospective cohort study. We recruited patients ≥45 years old who had elective elevated-risk noncardiac surgery in 45 centers across 17 countries between June 2017 and April 2020. The primary outcome was MI defined according to the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. We measured the proportion of new prognostic information added by self-reported MET using multivariable logistic regression., Results: In total, 860 (41.3%) patients suffered MI. In patients without systematic troponin surveillance, the odds ratio for MI with each 1-point increment in MET equaled 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-1.07). The new prognostic information, according to the likelihood ratio adequacy index, accounted for 1.5%. Sensitivity analysis, including centers with >90% of patients with routine high-sensitivity troponin T monitoring, showed that MET added 21.8% of new information to the baseline model, and each additional point was associated with a lower risk of MI (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.81-0.91)., Conclusions: In elevated-risk noncardiac surgery, self-reported functional capacity measures do not significantly improve the prediction of MI; however, they add new prognostic information in centers with routine perioperative troponin monitoring.

Background and Objectives: Preoperative anaemia is an independent risk factor for a higher morbidity and mortality, a longer hospitalization and increased perioperative transfusion rates. Managing preoperative anaemia is the first of three pillars of Patient Blood Management (PBM), a multidisciplinary concept to improve patient safety. While various studies provide medical information on (successful) anaemia treatment pathways, knowledge of organizational details of diagnosis and management of preoperative anaemia across Europe is scarce., Materials and Methods: To gain information on various aspects of preoperative anaemia management including organization, financing, diagnostics and treatment, we conducted a survey (74 questions) in ten hospitals from seven European nations within the PaBloE (Patient Blood Management in Europe) working group covering the year 2016., Results: Organization and activity in the field of preoperative anaemia management were heterogeneous in the participating hospitals. Almost all hospitals had pathways for managing preoperative anaemia in place, however, only two nations had national guidelines. In six of the ten participating hospitals, preoperative anaemia management was organized by anaesthetists. Diagnostics and treatment focused on iron deficiency anaemia which, in most hospitals, was corrected with intravenous iron., Conclusion: Implementation and approaches of preoperative anaemia management vary across Europe with a primary focus on treating iron deficiency anaemia. Findings of this survey motivated the hospitals involved to critically evaluate their practice and may also help other hospitals interested in PBM to develop action plans for diagnosis and management of preoperative anaemia., (© 2019 The Authors. Vox Sanguinis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Blood Transfusion.)