Search

BackgroundAlthough interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment (IMPT) programs are widely regarded as treatment of choice for patients with chronic pain, there are signs that many patients are unable to maintain their treatment gains in the long term. To facilitate the maintenance of positive treatment outcomes over time, we developed two relapse prevention strategies. ObjectiveThe main objective of this study was to explore the feasibility of these strategies within the context of IMPT programs. MethodsWe performed a feasibility study using 3 workbook prototypes containing either one or both strategies. For a period of 6 months, the workbooks were made available in two IMPT facilities. Qualitative data were collected through a focus group and semistructured interviews. We performed a thematic analysis using a deductive approach with (1) applicability to the treatment program, (2) acceptability of the workbook content, and (3) form, as predefined themes. ResultsThe final dataset consisted of transcripts from a focus group with health care providers and 11 telephone interviews and 2 additional in-depth interviews with patients. In general, the intervention was perceived as useful, easy to use, and in line with the treatment program. The data also include suggestions to further improve the use of both strategies, including more specific implementation guidelines, revised goal-setting procedure, and development of a mobile health version. However, several factors, including a high dropout rate and small sample size, impact the external validity of our findings. ConclusionsThis study should be regarded as a first step in the process of transforming the prototype workbook into an effective intervention for clinical practice. Although these initial results indicate a favorable evaluation of both behavior regulation strategies within the workbook, this study encountered multiple barriers regarding implementation and data collection that limit the generalizability of these results. Future research efforts should specifically address the fidelity of HCPs and patients and should include clear procedures regarding recruitment and use of both relapse prevention strategies during treatment.

BackgroundTo facilitate adherence to adaptive pain management behaviors after interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment, we developed a mobile health app (AGRIPPA app) that contains two behavior regulation strategies. ObjectiveThe aims of this project are (1) to test the effectiveness of the AGRIPPA app on pain disability; (2) to determine the cost-effectiveness; and (3) to explore the levels of engagement and usability of app users. MethodsWe will perform a multicenter randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups. Within the 12-month inclusion period, we plan to recruit 158 adult patients with chronic pain during the initial stage of their interdisciplinary treatment program in one of the 6 participating centers. Participants will be randomly assigned to the standard treatment condition or to the enhanced treatment condition in which they will receive the AGRIPPA app. Patients will be monitored from the start of the treatment program until 12 months posttreatment. In our primary analysis, we will evaluate the difference over time of pain-related disability between the two conditions. Other outcome measures will include health-related quality of life, illness perceptions, pain self-efficacy, app system usage data, productivity loss, and health care expenses. ResultsThe study was approved by the local Medical Research Ethics Committee in October 2019. As of March 20, 2020, we have recruited 88 patients. ConclusionsThis study will be the first step in systematically evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of the AGRIPPA app. After 3 years of development and feasibility testing, this formal evaluation will help determine to what extent the app will influence the maintenance of treatment gains over time. The outcomes of this trial will guide future decisions regarding uptake in clinical practice. Trial RegistrationNetherlands Trial Register NL8076; https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/8076 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)DERR1-10.2196/18632

Purpose: Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is characterized by neuropathic pain, associated with decreased quality of life (QOL). It remains unclear which psychosocial factors play a role in SFN. The experience sampling method (ESM) allows a profound understanding of the real-time fluctuations in reaction to events. The main goal of this study was to increase knowledge of the interrelationships between pain intensity, physical activity, and psychosocial factors in patients with SFN in daily practice over time. Patients and Methods: A prospective observational ESM study with the PsyMate© application (smart-eHealth GmbH, Luxembourg) was conducted at the Adelante location of Maastricht University Medical Center+ in the Netherlands. Participants with idiopathic SFN, older than 18 years, with an indication for rehabilitation, were included. Pain intensity, fatigue, positive and negative affect, physical activity, avoidance behavior, and pain catastrophic thoughts were incorporated into the ESM questions. Participants received 10 beep signals per day followed by the above-mentioned questions, for consecutive 7 days. The results were analyzed with linear mixed-effect models. Results: Twenty-one participants were included with a mean age of 48.24 (SD ± 13.89) years, of whom 76.2% were female. More pain (now) resulted in more physical activity (later) (a) and more physical activity (now) resulted in more pain (later) (b). The first association (a) is influenced by pain catastrophic thoughts and fatigue, and the second (b) by an increase in affective states and a lower level of avoidance behavior. Conclusion: In idiopathic SFN, pain intensity, and physical activity showed a 2-sided association, influenced by catastrophic thoughts, fatigue, affective states, and avoidance behavior. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In chronic pain syndromes, symptoms can fluctuate and change over time. Standard questionnaires cannot register these fluctuations. Nonetheless, the experience sampling method (ESM) is developed to collect momentary measurements of everyday complaints, tracing fluctuations in symptoms and disabling factors over time. Although valuable information can be collected in this way, assessment may also be a burden. This study aimed to investigate the acceptability, usability, and feasibility of ESM in chronic secondary pain syndromes, in a single-center study in the Netherlands. Methods: A prospective observational study with repeated measurements was conducted in patients with chronic secondary neuropathic and musculoskeletal pain syndromes, including small fiber neuropathy, spinal cord injury, and rheumatoid disorder. Results: Thirty-four participants were included and filled in the ESM, of whom 19 were diagnosed with small fiber neuropathy, 11 with spinal cord injury, and 4 with a rheumatoid disorder. The mean age was 54.7 ± 13.9 years (range: 23-77) of whom 52.9% were female. In total, 19 participants filled in the general and user-friendliness evaluation about the acceptability and usability of the ESM. The general evaluation showed no influence of ESM on participants' social contacts (mean 1.47, SD 1.12), activities (mean 1.74, SD 1.44), and mood (mean 1.89, SD 1.59). The answers options of ESM were a good representation of the experiences of participants (mean 4.58, SD 1.77). Regarding feasibility, the overall response rate for answering the beep signals of ESM was 44.5% in total. The missing rate per person varied from 13% to 97% with a median of 54.1%. Conclusion: The general evaluation and the user-friendliness revealed sufficient outcomes in favor of the ESM application. ESM seems a promising measurement tool to use in secondary chronic pain syndromes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Literature shows promising effects for interdisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation programs in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Not every patient needs an interdisciplinary rehabilitation trajectory provided in a secondary care setting. Patients with moderate complex psychosocial complaints might benefit from biopsychosocial interventions offered in primary care under supervision of a physician in rehabilitation medicine (i.e. biopsychosocial integrated care intervention). This study investigated the feasibility and effectiveness of such intervention in patients with CLBP with moderate complex psychosocial complaints. Methods: mixed-method. Patients (aged 18-65 years, low back pain ≥12 weeks, moderate complex psychosocial complaints) received the intervention (4 individual sessions, 8 group sessions) provided by trained primary care physiotherapists. Physicians in rehabilitation medicine provided one consultation afterwards. Data from patients (n¼18), physicians (n¼4) and physiotherapists (n¼12) were used. Results: Physiotherapists were satisfied with the training. Patient attendance was good for individual sessions, less for groups. Physiotherapists sufficiently delivered the intervention, although recruitment and contextual factors influenced delivery. Patients reported significantly reduced functional disability (Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale) post-treatment (-8.3, 95% CI -13.3 to -2.7) and at 3months follow-up (-7.6, 95% CI -12.9 to -2.2). Conclusions: A biopsychosocial integrated intervention is feasible and potentially effective in patients with CLBP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]