Search

Motivated by applications in production planning and storage allocation in hierarchical databases, we initiate the study of covering partially ordered items (CPO). Given a capacity $k \in \mathbb{Z}^+$, and a directed graph $G=(V,E)$ where each vertex has a size in $\{0,1, \ldots,k\}$, we seek a collection of subsets of vertices $S_1, \ldots, S_m$ that cover all the vertices, such that for any $1 \leq j \leq m$, the total size of vertices in $S_j$ is bounded by $k$, and there are no edges from $V \setminus S_j$ to $S_j$. The objective is to minimize the number of subsets $m$. CPO is closely related to the rule caching problem (RCP) that is of wide interest in the networking area. The input for RCP is a directed graph $G=(V,E)$, a profit function $p:V \rightarrow \mathbb{Z}_{0}^+$, and $k \in \mathbb{Z}^+$. The output is a subset $S \subseteq V$ of maximum profit such that $|S| \leq k$ and there are no edges from $V \setminus S$ to $S$. Our main result is a $2$-approximation algorithm for CPO on out-trees, complemented by an asymptotic $1.5$-hardness of approximation result. We also give a two-way reduction between RCP and the densest $k$-subhypergraph problem, surprisingly showing that the problems are equivalent w.r.t. polynomial-time approximation within any factor $\rho \geq 1$. This implies that RCP cannot be approximated within factor $|V|^{1-\eps}$ for any fixed $\eps>0$, under standard complexity assumptions. Prior to this work, RCP was just known to be strongly NP-hard. We further show that there is no EPTAS for the special case of RCP where the profits are uniform, assuming Gap-ETH. Since this variant admits a PTAS, we essentially resolve the complexity status of this problem.

One of the most important and well-studied settings for network design is edge-connectivity requirements. This encompasses uniform demands such as the Minimum $k$-Edge-Connected Spanning Subgraph problem as well as nonuniform demands such as the Survivable Network Design problem (SND). In a recent paper by [Dinitz, Koranteng, Kortsarz APPROX '22] , the authors observed that a weakness of these formulations is that it does not enable one to consider fault-tolerance in graphs that have just a few small cuts. To remedy this, they introduced new variants of these problems under the notion "relative" fault-tolerance. Informally, this requires not that two nodes are connected if there are a bounded number of faults (as in the classical setting), but that two nodes are connected if there are a bounded number of faults and the two nodes are connected in the underlying graph post-faults. The problem is already highly non-trivial even for the case of a single demand. Due to difficulties introduced by this new notion of fault-tolerance, the results in [Dinitz, Koranteng, Kortsarz APPROX '22] are quite limited. For the Relative Survivable Network Design problem (RSND), when the demands are not uniform they give a nontrivial result only when there is a single demand with a connectivity requirement of $3$: a non-optimal $27/4$-approximation. We strengthen this result in two significant ways: We give a $2$-approximation for RSND where all requirements are at most $3$, and a $2^{O(k^2)}$-approximation for RSND with a single demand of arbitrary value $k$. To achieve these results, we first use the "cactus representation'' of minimum cuts to give a lossless reduction to normal SND. Second, we extend the techniques of [Dinitz, Koranteng, Kortsarz APPROX '22] to prove a generalized and more complex version of their structure theorem, which we then use to design a recursive approximation algorithm., Comment: 34 pages, 4 figures

While much of network design focuses mostly on cost (number or weight of edges), node degrees have also played an important role. They have traditionally either appeared as an objective, to minimize the maximum degree (e.g., the Minimum Degree Spanning Tree problem), or as constraints which might be violated to give bicriteria approximations (e.g., the Minimum Cost Degree Bounded Spanning Tree problem). We extend the study of degrees in network design in two ways. First, we introduce and study a new variant of the Survivable Network Design Problem where in addition to the traditional objective of minimizing the cost of the chosen edges, we add a constraint that the $\ell_p$-norm of the node degree vector is bounded by an input parameter. This interpolates between the classical settings of maximum degree (the $\ell_{\infty}$-norm) and the number of edges (the $\ell_1$-degree), and has natural applications in distributed systems and VLSI design. We give a constant bicriteria approximation in both measures using convex programming. Second, we provide a polylogrithmic bicriteria approximation for the Degree Bounded Group Steiner problem on bounded treewidth graphs, solving an open problem from [Kortsarz and Nutov, Discret. Appl. Math. 2022] and [Guo et al., Algorithmica 2022]., Comment: 16 pages

One of the most important and well-studied settings for network design is edge-connectivity requirements. This encompasses uniform demands such as the Minimum $k$-Edge-Connected Spanning Subgraph problem ($k$-ECSS), as well as nonuniform demands such as the Survivable Network Design problem. A weakness of these formulations, though, is that we are not able to ask for fault-tolerance larger than the connectivity. We introduce and study new variants of these problems under a notion of relative fault-tolerance. Informally, we require not that two nodes are connected if there are a bounded number of faults (as in the classical setting), but that two nodes are connected if there are a bounded number of faults and the two nodes are connected in the underlying graph post-faults. That is, the subgraph we build must "behave" identically to the underlying graph with respect to connectivity after bounded faults. We define and introduce these problems, and provide the first approximation algorithms: a $(1+4/k)$-approximation for the unweighted relative version of $k$-ECSS, a $2$-approximation for the weighted relative version of $k$-ECSS, and a $27/4$-approximation for the special case of Relative Survivable Network Design with only a single demand with a connectivity requirement of $3$. To obtain these results, we introduce a number of technical ideas that may of independent interest. First, we give a generalization of Jain's iterative rounding analysis that works even when the cut-requirement function is not weakly supermodular, but instead satisfies a weaker definition we introduce and term local weak supermodularity. Second, we prove a structure theorem and design an approximation algorithm utilizing a new decomposition based on important separators, which are structures commonly used in fixed-parameter algorithms that have not commonly been used in approximation algorithms., Comment: 29 pages, to appear at APPROX 2022

We show that Set Cover on instances with $N$ elements cannot be approximated within $(1-\gamma)\ln N$-factor in time exp($N^{\gamma-\delta})$, for any $0 < \gamma < 1$ and any $\delta > 0$, assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis. This essentially matches the best upper bound known by Cygan et al.\ (IPL, 2009) of $(1-\gamma)\ln N$-factor in time $exp(O(N^\gamma))$. The lower bound is obtained by extracting a standalone reduction from Label Cover to Set Cover from the work of Moshkovitz (Theory of Computing, 2015), and applying it to a different PCP theorem than done there. We also obtain a tighter lower bound when conditioning on the Projection Games Conjecture. We also treat three problems (Directed Steiner Tree, Submodular Cover, and Connected Polymatroid) that strictly generalize Set Cover. We give a $(1-\gamma)\ln N$-approximation algorithm for these problems that runs in $exp(\tilde{O}(N^\gamma))$ time, for any $1/2 \le \gamma < 1$.

We study two problems that seek a subtree $T$ of a graph $G=(V,E)$ such that $T$ satisfies a certain property and has minimal maximum degree. - In the Min-Degree Group Steiner Tree problem we are given a collection ${\cal S}$ of groups (subsets of $V$) and $T$ should contain a node from every group. - In the Min-Degree Steiner $k$-Tree problem we are given a set $R$ of terminals and an integer $k$, and $T$ should contain at least $k$ terminals. We show that if the former problem admits approximation ratio $\rho$ then the later problem admits approximation ratio $\rho \cdot O(\log k)$. For bounded treewidth graphs, we obtain approximation ratio $O(\log^3 n)$ for Min-Degree Group Steiner Tree. In the more general Bounded Degree Group Steiner Tree problem we are also given edge costs and degree bounds $\{b(v):v \in V\}$, and $T$ should obey the degree constraints $deg_T(v) \leq b(v)$ for all $v \in V$. We give a bicriteria $(O(\log N \log |{\cal S}|),O(\log^2 n))$-approximation algorithm for this problem on tree inputs, where $N$ is the size of the largest group, generalizing the approximation of Garg, Konjevod, and Ravi for the case without degree bounds.

Directed Steiner Tree (DST) is a central problem in combinatorial optimization and theoretical computer science: Given a directed graph $G=(V, E)$ with edge costs $c \in \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}^E$, a root $r \in V$ and $k$ terminals $K\subseteq V$, we need to output the minimum-cost arborescence in $G$ that contains an $r$\textrightarrow $t$ path for every $t \in K$. Recently, Grandoni, Laekhanukit and Li, and independently Ghuge and Nagarajan, gave quasi-polynomial time $O(\log^2k/\log \log k)$-approximation algorithms for the problem, which are tight under popular complexity assumptions. In this paper, we consider the more general Degree-Bounded Directed Steiner Tree (DB-DST) problem, where we are additionally given a degree bound $d_v$ on each vertex $v \in V$, and we require that every vertex $v$ in the output tree has at most $d_v$ children. We give a quasi-polynomial time $(O(\log n \log k), O(\log^2 n))$-bicriteria approximation: The algorithm produces a solution with cost at most $O(\log n\log k)$ times the cost of the optimum solution that violates the degree constraints by at most a factor of $O(\log^2n)$. This is the first non-trivial result for the problem. While our cost-guarantee is nearly optimal, the degree violation factor of $O(\log^2n)$ is an $O(\log n)$-factor away from the approximation lower bound of $\Omega(\log n)$ from the set-cover hardness. The hardness result holds even on the special case of the {\em Degree-Bounded Group Steiner Tree} problem on trees (DB-GST-T). With the hope of closing the gap, we study the question of whether the degree violation factor can be made tight for this special case. We answer the question in the affirmative by giving an $(O(\log n\log k), O(\log n))$-bicriteria approximation algorithm for DB-GST-T.

This paper concerns proving almost tight (super-polynomial) running times, for achieving desired approximation ratios for various problems. To illustrate, the question we study, let us consider the Set-Cover problem with n elements and m sets. Now we specify our goal to approximate Set-Cover to a factor of (1-d)ln n, for a given parameter 0= 2^{n^{c d}}, for some constant 0= exp((1+o(1)){log^{d-c}n}), for any c>0, unless the ETH is false. Our result follows by analyzing the work of Halperin and Krauthgamer [STOC, 2003]. The same lower and upper bounds hold for CST.

We introduce the problem of finding a spanning tree along with a partition of the tree edges into fewest number of feasible sets, where constraints on the edges define feasibility. The motivation comes from wireless networking, where we seek to model the irregularities seen in actual wireless environments. Not all node pairs may be able to communicate, even if geographically close --- thus, the available pairs are modeled with a link graph $\mathcal{L}=(V,E)$. Also, signal attenuation need not follow a nice geometric formulas --- hence, interference is modeled by a conflict (hyper)graph $\mathcal{C}=(E,F)$ on the links. The objective is to maximize the efficiency of the communication, or equivalently minimizing the length of a schedule of the tree edges in the form of a coloring. We find that in spite of all this generality, the problem can be approximated linearly in terms of a versatile parameter, the inductive independence of the interference graph. Specifically, we give a simple algorithm that attains a $O(\rho \log n)$-approximation, where $n$ is the number of nodes and $\rho$ is the inductive independence, and show that near-linear dependence on $\rho$ is also necessary. We also treat an extension to Steiner trees, modeling multicasting, and obtain a comparable result. Our results suggest that several canonical assumptions of geometry, regularity and "niceness" in wireless settings can sometimes be relaxed without a significant hit in algorithm performance., Comment: 19 pages

We consider questions that arise from the intersection between the areas of polynomial-time approximation algorithms, subexponential-time algorithms, and fixed-parameter tractable algorithms. The questions, which have been asked several times (e.g., [Marx08, FGMS12, DF13]), are whether there is a non-trivial FPT-approximation algorithm for the Maximum Clique (Clique) and Minimum Dominating Set (DomSet) problems parameterized by the size of the optimal solution. In particular, letting $\text{OPT}$ be the optimum and $N$ be the size of the input, is there an algorithm that runs in $t(\text{OPT})\text{poly}(N)$ time and outputs a solution of size $f(\text{OPT})$, for any functions $t$ and $f$ that are independent of $N$ (for Clique, we want $f(\text{OPT})=\omega(1)$)? In this paper, we show that both Clique and DomSet admit no non-trivial FPT-approximation algorithm, i.e., there is no $o(\text{OPT})$-FPT-approximation algorithm for Clique and no $f(\text{OPT})$-FPT-approximation algorithm for DomSet, for any function $f$ (e.g., this holds even if $f$ is the Ackermann function). In fact, our results imply something even stronger: The best way to solve Clique and DomSet, even approximately, is to essentially enumerate all possibilities. Our results hold under the Gap Exponential Time Hypothesis (Gap-ETH) [Dinur16, MR16], which states that no $2^{o(n)}$-time algorithm can distinguish between a satisfiable 3SAT formula and one which is not even $(1 - \epsilon)$-satisfiable for some constant $\epsilon > 0$. Besides Clique and DomSet, we also rule out non-trivial FPT-approximation for Maximum Balanced Biclique, Maximum Subgraphs with Hereditary Properties, and Maximum Induced Matching in bipartite graphs. Additionally, we rule out $k^{o(1)}$-FPT-approximation algorithm for Densest $k$-Subgraph although this ratio does not yet match the trivial $O(k)$-approximation algorithm., Comment: 43 pages. To appear in FOCS'17

The study of Dense-$3$-Subhypergraph problem was initiated in Chlamt{\'{a}}c et al. [Approx'16]. The input is a universe $U$ and collection ${\cal S}$ of subsets of $U$, each of size $3$, and a number $k$. The goal is to choose a set $W$ of $k$ elements from the universe, and maximize the number of sets, $S\in {\cal S}$ so that $S\subseteq W$. The members in $U$ are called {\em vertices} and the sets of ${\cal S}$ are called the {\em hyperedges}. This is the simplest extension into hyperedges of the case of sets of size $2$ which is the well known Dense $k$-subgraph problem. The best known ratio for the Dense-$3$-Subhypergraph is $O(n^{0.69783..})$ by Chlamt{\'{a}}c et al. We improve this ratio to $n^{0.61802..}$. More importantly, we give a new algorithm that approximates Dense-$3$-Subhypergraph within a ratio of $\tilde O(n/k)$, which improves the ratio of $O(n^2/k^2)$ of Chlamt{\'{a}}c et al. We prove that under the {\em log density conjecture} (see Bhaskara et al. [STOC'10]) the ratio cannot be better than $\Omega(\sqrt{n})$ and demonstrate some cases in which this optimum can be attained., Comment: Claim 4.6 does not hold for the algorithm; we erroneously claimed that we could nullify kD'_i edges in the ith step of the algorithm

It was recently found that there are very close connections between the existence of additive spanners (subgraphs where all distances are preserved up to an additive stretch), distance preservers (subgraphs in which demand pairs have their distance preserved exactly), and pairwise spanners (subgraphs in which demand pairs have their distance preserved up to a multiplicative or additive stretch) [Abboud-Godwin SODA '16, Godwin-Williams SODA '16]. We study these problems from an optimization point of view, where rather than studying the existence of extremal instances we are given an instance and are asked to find the sparsest possible spanner/preserver. We give an $O(n^{3/5 + \epsilon})$-approximation for distance preservers and pairwise spanners (for arbitrary constant $\epsilon > 0$). This is the first nontrivial upper bound for either problem, both of which are known to be as hard to approximate as Label Cover. We also prove Label Cover hardness for approximating additive spanners, even for the cases of additive 1 stretch (where one might expect a polylogarithmic approximation, since the related multiplicative 2-spanner problem admits an $O(\log n)$-approximation) and additive polylogarithmic stretch (where the related multiplicative spanner problem has an $O(1)$-approximation). Interestingly, the techniques we use in our approximation algorithm extend beyond distance-based problem to pure connectivity network design problems. In particular, our techniques allow us to give an $O(n^{3/5 + \epsilon})$-approximation for the Directed Steiner Forest problem (for arbitrary constant $\epsilon > 0$) when all edges have uniform costs, improving the previous best $O(n^{2/3 + \epsilon})$-approximation due to Berman et al.~[ICALP '11] (which holds for general edge costs)., Comment: 33 pages

The Densest $k$-Subgraph (D$k$S) problem, and its corresponding minimization problem Smallest $p$-Edge Subgraph (S$p$ES), have come to play a central role in approximation algorithms. This is due both to their practical importance, and their usefulness as a tool for solving and establishing approximation bounds for other problems. These two problems are not well understood, and it is widely believed that they do not an admit a subpolynomial approximation ratio (although the best known hardness results do not rule this out). In this paper we generalize both D$k$S and S$p$ES from graphs to hypergraphs. We consider the Densest $k$-Subhypergraph problem (given a hypergraph $(V, E)$, find a subset $W\subseteq V$ of $k$ vertices so as to maximize the number of hyperedges contained in $W$) and define the Minimum $p$-Union problem (given a hypergraph, choose $p$ of the hyperedges so as to minimize the number of vertices in their union). We focus in particular on the case where all hyperedges have size 3, as this is the simplest non-graph setting. For this case we provide an $O(n^{4(4-\sqrt{3})/13 + \epsilon}) \leq O(n^{0.697831+\epsilon})$-approximation (for arbitrary constant $\epsilon > 0$) for Densest $k$-Subhypergraph and an $\tilde O(n^{2/5})$-approximation for Minimum $p$-Union. We also give an $O(\sqrt{m})$-approximation for Minimum $p$-Union in general hypergraphs. Finally, we examine the interesting special case of interval hypergraphs (instances where the vertices are a subset of the natural numbers and the hyperedges are intervals of the line) and prove that both problems admit an exact polynomial time solution on these instances., Comment: 21 pages

In the Tree Augmentation Problem (TAP) the goal is to augment a tree $T$ by a minimum size edge set $F$ from a given edge set $E$ such that $T \cup F$ is $2$-edge-connected. The best approximation ratio known for TAP is $1.5$. In the more general Weighted TAP problem, $F$ should be of minimum weight. Weighted TAP admits several $2$-approximation algorithms w.r.t. to the standard cut LP-relaxation, but for all of them the performance ratio of $2$ is tight even for TAP. The problem is equivalent to the problem of covering a laminar set family. Laminar set families play an important role in the design of approximation algorithms for connectivity network design problems. In fact, Weighted TAP is the simplest connectivity network design problem for which a ratio better than $2$ is not known. Improving this "natural" ratio is a major open problem, which may have implications on many other network design problems. It seems that achieving this goal requires finding an LP-relaxation with integrality gap better than $2$, which is a long time open problem even for TAP. In this paper we introduce such an LP-relaxation and give an algorithm that computes a feasible solution for TAP of size at most $1.75$ times the optimal LP value. This gives some hope to break the ratio $2$ for the weighted case. Our algorithm computes some initial edge set by solving a partial system of constraints that form the integral edge-cover polytope, and then applies local search on $3$-leaf subtrees to exchange some of the edges and to add additional edges. Thus we do not need to solve the LP, and the algorithm runs roughly in time required to find a minimum weight edge-cover in a general graph., Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1507.02799

The Tree Augmentation Problem (TAP) is: given a connected graph $G=(V,{\cal E})$ and an edge set $E$ on $V$ find a minimum size subset of edges $F \subseteq E$ such that $(V,{\cal E} \cup F)$ is $2$-edge-connected. In the conference version \cite{EFKN-APPROX} was sketched a $1.5$-approximation algorithm for the problem. Since a full proof was very complex and long, the journal version was cut into two parts. In the first part \cite{EFKN-TALG} was only proved ratio $1.8$. An attempt to simplify the second part produced an error in \cite{EKN-IPL}. Here we give a correct, different, and self contained proof of the ratio $1.5$, that is also substantially simpler and shorter than the previous proofs.

In this paper we consider the pairwise kidney exchange game. This game naturally appears in situations that some service providers benefit from pairwise allocations on a network, such as the kidney exchanges between hospitals. Ashlagi et al. present a $2$-approximation randomized truthful mechanism for this problem. This is the best known result in this setting with multiple players. However, we note that the variance of the utility of an agent in this mechanism may be as large as $\Omega(n^2)$, which is not desirable in a real application. In this paper we resolve this issue by providing a $2$-approximation randomized truthful mechanism in which the variance of the utility of each agent is at most $2+\epsilon$. Interestingly, we could apply our technique to design a deterministic mechanism such that, if an agent deviates from the mechanism, she does not gain more than $2\lceil \log_2 m\rceil$. We call such a mechanism an almost truthful mechanism. Indeed, in a practical scenario, an almost truthful mechanism is likely to imply a truthful mechanism. We believe that our approach can be used to design low risk or almost truthful mechanisms for other problems.

An instance of the Connected Maximum Cut problem consists of an undirected graph G = (V, E) and the goal is to find a subset of vertices S $\subseteq$ V that maximizes the number of edges in the cut \delta(S) such that the induced graph G[S] is connected. We present the first non-trivial \Omega(1/log n) approximation algorithm for the connected maximum cut problem in general graphs using novel techniques. We then extend our algorithm to an edge weighted case and obtain a poly-logarithmic approximation algorithm. Interestingly, in stark contrast to the classical max-cut problem, we show that the connected maximum cut problem remains NP-hard even on unweighted, planar graphs. On the positive side, we obtain a polynomial time approximation scheme for the connected maximum cut problem on planar graphs and more generally on graphs with bounded genus., Comment: 17 pages, Conference version to appear in ESA 2015

Given an edge-weighted directed graph $G=(V,E)$ on $n$ vertices and a set $T=\{t_1, t_2, \ldots, t_p\}$ of $p$ terminals, the objective of the \scss ($p$-SCSS) problem is to find an edge set $H\subseteq E$ of minimum weight such that $G[H]$ contains an $t_{i}\rightarrow t_j$ path for each $1\leq i\neq j\leq p$. In this paper, we investigate the computational complexity of a variant of $2$-SCSS where we have demands for the number of paths between each terminal pair. Formally, the \sharinggeneral problem is defined as follows: given an edge-weighted directed graph $G=(V,E)$ with weight function $\omega: E\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{\geq 0}$, two terminal vertices $s, t$, and integers $k_1, k_2$ ; the objective is to find a set of $k_1$ paths $F_1, F_2, \ldots, F_{k_1}$ from $s\leadsto t$ and $k_2$ paths $B_1, B_2, \ldots, B_{k_2}$ from $t\leadsto s$ such that $\sum_{e\in E} \omega(e)\cdot \phi(e)$ is minimized, where $\phi(e)= \max \Big\{|\{i\in [k_1] : e\in F_i\}|\ ,\ |\{j\in [k_2] : e\in B_j\}|\Big\}$. For each $k\geq 1$, we show the following: The \sharing problem can be solved in $n^{O(k)}$ time. A matching lower bound for our algorithm: the \sharing problem does not have an $f(k)\cdot n^{o(k)}$ algorithm for any computable function $f$, unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. Our algorithm for \sharing relies on a structural result regarding an optimal solution followed by using the idea of a "token game" similar to that of Feldman and Ruhl. We show with an example that the structural result does not hold for the \sharinggeneral problem if $\min\{k_1, k_2\}\geq 2$. Therefore \sharing is the most general problem one can attempt to solve with our techniques., Comment: To appear in Algorithmica. An extended abstract appeared in IPEC '14

In this paper, we consider proving inapproximability in terms of OPT and thus we base the foundations of fixed parameter inapproximability.

A Fixed-Parameter Tractable (\FPT) $\rho$-approximation algorithm for a minimization (resp. maximization) parameterized problem $P$ is an FPT algorithm that, given an instance $(x, k)\in P$ computes a solution of cost at most $k \cdot \rho(k)$ (resp. $k/\rho(k)$) if a solution of cost at most (resp. at least) $k$ exists; otherwise the output can be arbitrary. For well-known intractable problems such as the W[1]-hard {Clique} and W[2]-hard {Set Cover} problems, the natural question is whether we can get any \FPT-approximation. It is widely believed that both {Clique} and {Set-Cover} admit no FPT $\rho$-approximation algorithm, for any increasing function $\rho$. Assuming standard conjectures such as the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) \cite{eth-paturi} and the Projection Games Conjecture (PGC) \cite{r3}, we make the first progress towards proving this conjecture by showing that 1. Under the ETH and PGC, there exist constants $F_1, F_2 >0$ such that the {Set Cover} problem does not admit an FPT approximation algorithm with ratio $k^{F_1}$ in $2^{k^{F_2}}\cdot \text{poly}(N,M)$ time, where $N$ is the size of the universe and $M$ is the number of sets. 2. Unless $\NP\subseteq \SUBEXP$, for every $1> \delta > 0$ there exists a constant $F(\delta)>0$ such that {Clique} has no FPT cost approximation with ratio $k^{1-\delta}$ in $2^{k^{F}}\cdot \text{poly}(n)$ time, where $n$ is the number of vertices in the graph. In the second part of the paper we consider various W[1]-hard problems such as {\dst}, {\dsf}, Directed Steiner Network and {\mec}. For all these problem we give polynomial time $f(\text{OPT})$-approximation algorithms for some small function $f$ (the largest approximation ratio we give is $\text{OPT}^2$).

In the {\em Movement Repairmen (MR)} problem we are given a metric space $(V, d)$ along with a set $R$ of $k$ repairmen $r_1, r_2, ..., r_k$ with their start depots $s_1, s_2, ..., s_k \in V$ and speeds $v_1, v_2, ..., v_k \geq 0$ respectively and a set $C$ of $m$ clients $c_1, c_2, ..., c_m$ having start locations $s'_1, s'_2, ..., s'_m \in V$ and speeds $v'_1, v'_2, ..., v'_m \geq 0$ respectively. If $t$ is the earliest time a client $c_j$ is collocated with any repairman (say, $r_i$) at a node $u$, we say that the client is served by $r_i$ at $u$ and that its latency is $t$. The objective in the (\smr{}) problem is to plan the movements for all repairmen and clients to minimize the sum (average) of the clients latencies. The motivation for this problem comes, for example, from Amazon Locker Delivery \cite{amazon} and USPS gopost \cite{gopost}. We give the first $O(\log n)$-approximation algorithm for the \smr{} problem.

In Source Location (SL) problems the goal is to select a mini-mum cost source set $S \subseteq V$ such that the connectivity (or flow) $\psi(S,v)$ from $S$ to any node $v$ is at least the demand $d_v$ of $v$. In many SL problems $\psi(S,v)=d_v$ if $v \in S$, namely, the demand of nodes selected to $S$ is completely satisfied. In a node-connectivity variant suggested recently by Fukunaga, every node $v$ gets a "bonus" $p_v \leq d_v$ if it is selected to $S$. Fukunaga showed that for undirected graphs one can achieve ratio $O(k \ln k)$ for his variant, where $k=\max_{v \in V}d_v$ is the maximum demand. We improve this by achieving ratio $\min\{p^*\lnk,k\}\cdot O(\ln (k/q^*))$ for a more general version with node capacities, where $p^*=\max_{v \in V} p_v$ is the maximum bonus and $q^*=\min_{v \in V} q_v$ is the minimum capacity. In particular, for the most natural case $p^*=1$ considered by Fukunaga, we improve the ratio from $O(k \ln k)$ to $O(\ln^2k)$. We also get ratio $O(k)$ for the edge-connectivity version, for which no ratio that depends on $k$ only was known before. To derive these results, we consider a particular case of the Survivable Network (SN) problem when all edges of positive cost form a star. We give ratio $O(\min\{\ln n,\ln^2 k\})$ for this variant, improving over the best ratio known for the general case $O(k^3 \ln n)$ of Chuzhoy and Khanna.

In the matroid secretary problem we are given a stream of elements and asked to choose a set of elements that maximizes the total value of the set, subject to being an independent set of a matroid given in advance. The difficulty comes from the assumption that decisions are irrevocable: if we choose to accept an element when it is presented by the stream then we can never get rid of it, and if we choose not to accept it then we cannot later add it. Babaioff, Immorlica, and Kleinberg [SODA 2007] introduced this problem, gave O(1)-competitive algorithms for certain classes of matroids, and conjectured that every matroid admits an O(1)-competitive algorithm. However, most matroids that are known to admit an O(1)-competitive algorithm can be easily represented using graphs (e.g. graphic and transversal matroids). In particular, there is very little known about F-representable matroids (the class of matroids that can be represented as elements of a vector space over a field F), which are one of the foundational matroid classes. Moreover, most of the known techniques are as dependent on graph theory as they are on matroid theory. We go beyond graphs by giving an O(1)-competitive algorithm for regular matroids (the class of matroids that are representable over every field), and use techniques that are matroid-theoretic rather than graph-theoretic. We use the regular matroid decomposition theorem of Seymour to decompose any regular matroid into matroids which are either graphic, cographic, or isomorphic to R_{10}, and then show how to combine algorithms for these basic classes into an algorithm for regular matroids. This allows us to generalize beyond regular matroids to any class of matroids that admits such a decomposition into classes for which we already have good algorithms. In particular, we give an O(1)-competitive algorithm for the class of max-flow min-cut matroids., Comment: 21 pages

We study the well-known Label Cover problem under the additional requirement that problem instances have large girth. We show that if the girth is some $k$, the problem is roughly $2^{\log^{1-\epsilon} n/k}$ hard to approximate for all constant $\epsilon > 0$. A similar theorem was claimed by Elkin and Peleg [ICALP 2000], but their proof was later found to have a fundamental error. We use the new proof to show inapproximability for the basic $k$-spanner problem, which is both the simplest problem in graph spanners and one of the few for which super-logarithmic hardness was not known. Assuming $NP \not\subseteq BPTIME(2^{polylog(n)})$, we show that for every $k \geq 3$ and every constant $\epsilon > 0$ it is hard to approximate the basic $k$-spanner problem within a factor better than $2^{(\log^{1-\epsilon} n) / k}$ (for large enough $n$). A similar hardness for basic $k$-spanner was claimed by Elkin and Peleg [ICALP 2000], but the error in their analysis of Label Cover made this proof fail as well. Thus for the problem of Label Cover with large girth we give the first non-trivial lower bound. For the basic $k$-spanner problem we improve the previous best lower bound of $\Omega(\log n)/k$ by Kortsarz [Algorithmica 1998]. Our main technique is subsampling the edges of 2-query PCPs, which allows us to reduce the degree of a PCP to be essentially equal to the soundness desired. This turns out to be enough to essentially guarantee large girth., Comment: 16 pages, revised to add a reference

We consider connectivity problems with orientation constraints. Given a directed graph $D$ and a collection of ordered node pairs $P$ let $P[D]=\{(u,v) \in P: D {contains a} uv{-path}}$. In the {\sf Steiner Forest Orientation} problem we are given an undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ with edge-costs and a set $P \subseteq V \times V$ of ordered node pairs. The goal is to find a minimum-cost subgraph $H$ of $G$ and an orientation $D$ of $H$ such that $P[D]=P$. We give a 4-approximation algorithm for this problem. In the {\sf Maximum Pairs Orientation} problem we are given a graph $G$ and a multi-collection of ordered node pairs $P$ on $V$. The goal is to find an orientation $D$ of $G$ such that $|P[D]|$ is maximum. Generalizing the result of Arkin and Hassin [DAM'02] for $|P|=2$, we will show that for a mixed graph $G$ (that may have both directed and undirected edges), one can decide in $n^{O(|P|)}$ time whether $G$ has an orientation $D$ with $P[D]=P$ (for undirected graphs this problem admits a polynomial time algorithm for any $P$, but it is NP-complete on mixed graphs). For undirected graphs, we will show that one can decide whether $G$ admits an orientation $D$ with $|P[D]| \geq k$ in $O(n+m)+2^{O(k\cdot \log \log k)}$ time; hence this decision problem is fixed-parameter tractable, which answers an open question from Dorn et al. [AMB'11]. We also show that {\sf Maximum Pairs Orientation} admits ratio $O(\log |P|/\log\log |P|)$, which is better than the ratio $O(\log n/\log\log n)$ of Gamzu et al. [WABI'10] when $|P|

We focus on designing combinatorial algorithms for the Capacitated Network Design problem (Cap-SNDP). The Cap-SNDP is the problem of satisfying connectivity requirements when edges have costs and hard capacities. We begin by showing that the Group Steiner tree problem (GST) is a special case of Cap-SNDP even when there is connectivity requirement between only one source-sink pair. This implies the first poly-logarithmic lower bound for the Cap-SNDP. We next provide combinatorial algorithms for several special cases of this problem. The Cap-SNDP is equivalent to its special case when every edge has either zero cost or infinite capacity. We consider a special case, called Connected Cap-SNDP, where all infinite-capacity edges in the solution are required to form a connected component containing the sinks. This problem is motivated by its similarity to the Connected Facility Location problem [G+01,SW04]. We solve this problem by reducing it to Submodular tree cover problem, which is a common generalization of Connected Cap-SNDP and Group Steiner tree problem. We generalize the recursive greedy algorithm [CEK] achieving a poly-logarithmic approximation algorithm for Submodular tree cover problem. This result is interesting in its own right and gives the first poly-logarithmic approximation algorithms for Connected hard capacities set multi-cover and Connected source location. We then study another special case of Cap-SNDP called Unbalanced point-to-point connection problem. Besides its practical applications to shift design problems [EKS], it generalizes many problems such as k-MST, Steiner Forest and Point-to-Point Connection. We give a combinatorial logarithmic approximation algorithm for this problem by reducing it to degree-bounded SNDP.