Search

Using data collected in routine care delivery to inform treatment is a key feature of a learning health system (LHS). In this study, we explored the experiences of service users and providers adopting measurement-based care (MBC) in early psychosis (EP) specialty care settings. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 32 providers and 12 service users across 18 programs in the Early Psychosis Intervention Network of California (EPI-CAL). These findings were compared with quantitative data from Beehive, EPI-CAL's data collection and review application. Regarding the clinical benefits of MBC in EP, three broad themes were identified - supporting safety monitoring and response, the assessment process, and delivery of psychotherapy. Outside of direct clinical care, Beehive was considered to support clinical supervision and external reporting, while service users reported data collection facilitated self-reflection. In the quantitative Beehive application data collected from 23 EP programs, high utilization of the safety alert system was evident (349 alerts in total, of which 338 [96.85 %] were resolved at a median of 2.03 days). However, service users' key survey data was only reviewed by assigned providers in 32.22 % (142 of 441) of cases. While providers and service users saw many benefits to Beehive, utilization was highly inconsistent outside of the alert system. Going forward, further consideration of how best to support EP providers to consistently use data in care is necessary to maximize the utility of the LHS approach and positively impact outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Tara A. Niendam is a cofounder and shareholder in Safari Health, Inc. No other authors disclosed any competing interests., (Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This evidence-based update (EBU) builds on three previous reviews (1998, 2008, 2017) sponsored by the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology with the aim of evaluating the empirical support for psychosocial interventions for depression in youth., Method: In the current review period (2014-2022), 25 randomized controlled trials (RCT) were identified: four in children and 21 in adolescents. Descriptive effect sizes and number-needed-to-treat (NNT) ratios were calculated for primary outcomes. Results were integrated with prior reviews, and cumulative evidence used to classify treatments as well-established, probably efficacious, possibly efficacious, or experimental. Published secondary analyses of predictors, moderators, and mediators were examined., Results: For adolescents, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT-A), CBT in combination with antidepressant medication, and collaborative care programs were all classified as well-established. The evidence was considerably weaker for children, with no treatments achieving well-established or probably efficacious status. New developments include greater exploration of parent- and family-mediated treatment models and increasing evidence on technology-assisted interventions. Data on predictors, moderators, and mediators continued to be focused on adolescent depression samples and drawn from a limited number of RCT datasets., Conclusion: Since the prior EBU, there has been incremental progress in youth depression treatment research. There is an urgent need to: (a) develop innovative approaches to substantially improve on the modest effects seen in most RCTs, (b) expand the evidence base for children and other underserved groups, (c) craft evidence-based guidelines for choosing between interventions when multiple efficacious treatments do exist, and (d) address issues of treatment effectiveness and scalability to ameliorate the wide prevalence and high impact of depression in youth.

Background: A prolonged first episode of psychosis (FEP) without adequate treatment is a predictor of poor clinical, functional, and health outcomes and significant economic burden. Team-based "coordinated specialty care" (CSC) for early psychosis (EP) has established effectiveness in promoting clinical and functional recovery. However, California's CSC program implementation has been unsystematic and could benefit from standardizing its processes and data collection infrastructure. To address this, we established a consortium of EP clinics across the state via a Learning Health Care Network (LHCN) framework to develop the Early Psychosis Intervention Network of California (EPI-CAL). EPI-CAL's LHCN developed a core battery of evidence-based measures for service users and family members and linked them together using a unique data collection and visualization application, Beehive., Methods and Objectives: EPI-CAL's LHCN collects, visualizes, and aggregates data at the individual and clinic level for EP programs across California via Beehive. Beehive was designed to: (1) collect outcomes data from service users receiving care at EP programs and their support persons, (2) provide the data to providers on a secure web-based dashboard to support measurement-based care, and (3) allow data to be used for program or research analysis. We will (1) determine the feasibility of implementing an LHCN across a diverse, decentralized network of early psychosis programs, (2) determine if the implementation of an LHCN increases the delivery of measurement-based care, and (3) determine if the implementation of measurement-based care is associated with significant improvements in key service user outcomes. EPI-CAL's network will contribute data to the Early Psychosis Intervention Network (EPINET) program., Discussion: The current study aims to establish an LHCN of EP clinics in California that implements harmonized data collection using Beehive and assesses the feasibility of establishing such a network. Our goal is for this harmonized data collection approach to be used to inform decisions and develop learning opportunities for service users, staff, and administrators, and to improve outcomes for service users and their supporters in CSC care. Further, the data will enable programs and research teams to examine what elements of care lead to program success and improved treatment outcomes for service users., Clinical Trials Registration: www., Clinicaltrials: gov , identifier NCT04007510; registered 07/05/2019., Competing Interests: Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate The University of California, Davis Institutional Review Board approved the study (1403828-21, California Collaborative Network to Promote Data-Driven Care and Improve Outcomes in Early Psychosis [CORE]). Additionally, several of the counties and universities with a program participating in EPI-CAL required a separate review and approval of the project by their institutional review board (e.g., Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health Human Subjects Research Committee; San Mateo County Behavioral Health and Recovery Services Institutional Review Board; Sacramento County Department of Health and Human Services Research Review Committee; Napa County Institutional Review Board; County of San Diego Behavioral Health Services Research Review Board; and Orange County Health Care Agency Human Subjects Review Committee) or compliance or oversight departments. Multisite/single IRB with reliance from UCSD and UCSF on UC Davis IRB. Associated IRB protocols include 1411596-5 (UCD), 1411602-2 (UCSD), 1411601-5 (UCSF). Competing interests Tara A. Niendam is a cofounder and shareholder in Safari Health, Inc. No other authors disclosed any competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Low parental warmth and high control are associated with parental depression and with the development of depression in children. The majority of this research, however, has focused on non-Hispanic White (NHW) parents. The present study tested whether parenting behaviors differed by race/ethnicity in a sample ( N = 169) of parents with a history of depression. Participants were drawn from a randomized trial designed to prevent depression in at-risk adolescents (ages 9-15 years old). All participating parents had a current or past depressive episode within the youth's lifetime. Parents self-classified as 67.5% NHW, 17.2% Latinx (LA), and 15.4% Black (BL). Youths and parents completed standardized positive and negative interaction tasks; trained raters coded the videotaped interactions for parental warmth and control. Analyses examined the impact of race/ethnicity, current parent depression symptoms, context of the discussion (positive/negative task), and demographic covariates on observed parenting behaviors. Results revealed significant interactions among race/ethnicity, depression, and task type. Differences in warmth and control between racial/ethnic groups were more likely to be observed in negative interactions and when parents' depression symptoms were lower. In these circumstances, BL parents were rated as higher in control and lower in warmth than NHW parents. Results add to the literature on racial/ethnic differences in parenting among parents with a history of depression and highlight the importance of assessing parenting in context to capture more subtle patterns of interactions between parents and offspring. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Objective: To report on broad-based outcomes of the Brief Behavioral Therapy (BBT) trial for pediatric anxiety and depression. Secondary data analyses expand on previous reports by assessing diagnostic remission and independent functioning, impact on targeted psychopathology, and spillover effects on non-targeted outcomes., Method: Youth (N = 185; 8-16.9 years; 58% female; 78% White; 21% Hispanic) with anxiety and/or depression were eligible for this multi-site trial. Enrolled youth were randomly assigned to receive 8 to 12 sessions of BBT in primary care or assisted referral to outpatient care (ARC). Assessments were conducted 16 and 32 weeks post randomization., Results: BBT was superior to ARC on remission of all targeted diagnoses (week 16: 56.8% vs 28.2%, p < .001; week 32: 62.5% vs 38.9%, p = .004), clinician-rated independent functioning (week 16: 75.0% vs 45.7%, p < .001; week 32: 81.2% vs 55.7%, p < .001), and on measures of anxiety, depression, suicide items, total comorbid behavioral and emotional problems, and hyperactivity (d = 0.21-0.49). Moderation analyses revealed superior outcomes for Hispanic youth in BBT vs ARC for diagnostic remission, anxiety, emotional problems, and parent-child conflict. Youth depression at baseline moderated effects on peer problems and parent-child conflict, with effects favoring BBT. Significant main and moderated effects of BBT on change in non-targeted outcomes were largely mediated by change in anxiety (24.2%-49.3% of total effects mediated)., Conclusion: BBT has positive effects on youth, mediated by the strong impact of the intervention on anxiety. Analyses continue to support positive outcomes for Hispanic youth, suggesting that BBT is a broadly effective transdiagnostic treatment option for diverse populations., Clinical Trial Registration Information: Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for Pediatric Anxiety and Depression in Primary Care; https://clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01147614., (Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)