Search

Introduction: This case report demonstrated a challenging clinical case addressed within a multidisciplinary approach to achieve its maintenance, even though had a poor prognosis. It was associated with the endodontic treatment with mucogingival techniques, including periodontal microsurgery and connective tissue graft. Case Presentation: A patient presented a deep gingival recession with the apex‐exposed non‐vital tooth with interproximal bone loss (RT2) and without mobility. The treatment involved an initial endodontic approach and periodontal therapy (scaling and root planing), microsurgical techniques with coronally advanced flap, root preparation with PrefGel (24% EDTA), enamel matrix derivatives (Emdogain), and connective tissue graft. As a clinical result, it was verified an increase of keratinized tissue width and gingival thickness, and root coverage (RC), reaching good esthetics and a stable result after 17 months. Conclusion: The correct diagnosis and technique selection may affect directly the outcome, especially in challenging cases. Even though there was a poor prognosis, an adequate treatment plan, patient cooperation, and technique mastery help to achieve a high level of RC, esthetic recovering, and successful outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The remaining epithelial layer existent in connective tissue graft (CTG) harvested from the hard palate, which underwent de‐epithelization outside the oral cavity, can be histologically detected unless it is completely removed. Its presence may cause adverse esthetics results, affecting thus the color and texture of the receptor site, and an increased risk of presence of scar tissues after surgical procedures. The proposal of this study was to evaluate the CTG (histological and morphometrically) collected from the hard palate using the Harris technique, removing the epithelial layer outside the mouth, assessing the remaining presence of epithelial tissue. Case Series: Fourteen patients (14 CTGs) were included in the present case series study, therefore there were two dropouts. A small part of the tip of the graft was harvested and fixed in formalin solution for histological processing, staining, and then to be morphometrically analyzed. The epithelial tissue and CTGs were assessed by three calibrated and double‐blinded professionals. All information was compiled, and the statistical analysis was performed. CTGs obtained had a width average of 1224.26 μm. There was no presence of any residual of the epithelium in three samples, whereas only one had the epithelium tissue covering the entire connective layer. Furthermore, seven samples (approximately 50%) had the presence of epithelium. Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, there was incomplete removal of the epithelial layer after harvesting the CTG using the Harris technique (44.32%), most likely due to its histological persistency, suggesting to be inaccurate the clinical removal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]