Search

Context: Cholesterol carried in lipoprotein(a) adds to measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and may therefore drive some diagnoses of clinical familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Objective: We investigated plasma lipoprotein(a) in individuals referred to Danish lipid clinics and evaluated the effect of plasma lipoprotein(a) on a diagnosis of FH. Methods: Individuals referred to 15 Danish lipid clinics who were suspected of having FH according to nationwide referral criteria were recruited between September 1, 2020 and November 30, 2021. All individuals were classified according to the Dutch Lipid Clinical Network criteria for FH before and after LDL-C was adjusted for 30% cholesterol content in lipoprotein(a). We calculated the fraction of individuals fulfilling a clinical diagnosis of FH partly due to elevated lipoprotein(a). Results: We included a total of 1166 individuals for analysis, of whom 206 fulfilled a clinical diagnosis of FH. Median lipoprotein(a) was 15 mg/dL (29 nmol/L) in those referred and 28% had lipoprotein(a) greater than or equal to 50 mg/dL (105 nmol/L), while 2% had levels greater than or equal to 180 mg/dL (389 nmol/L). We found that in 27% (55/206) of those fulfilling a clinical diagnosis of FH, this was partly due to high lipoprotein(a). Conclusion: Elevated lipoprotein(a) was common in individuals referred to Danish lipid clinics and in one-quarter of individuals who fulfilled a clinical diagnosis of FH, this was partly due to elevated lipoprotein(a). These findings support the notion that the LPA gene should be considered an important causative gene in patients with clinical FH and further support the importance of measuring lipoprotein(a) when diagnosing FH as well as for stratification of cardiovascular risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To investigate whether phase II cardiac rehabilitation (CR) conducted by a community model of shared care CR (SC-CR) including health care centres and general practice was feasible and provided acceptable results and to compare SC-CR to hospital-based CR (H-CR) in a randomised controlled trial. Methods: Patients were randomised to H-CR or SC-CR after admission for acute coronary syndrome. In SC-CR, the general practitioner took over the responsibility of the remaining rehabilitation, pharmacological treatment and risk factor management after the initial visit to the hospital outpatient clinic. The Municipal Health Care Centres provided courses on smoking cessation, nutrition, and exercise training and contributed to disease education and psychosocial support. The main endpoint was adherence to the CR programme and compliance with lifestyle modifications. Results: In total, 1364 patients were screened, 327 (24%) were eligible, and 212 (65%) accepted participation. Phase II CR was completed by 192 (91%) of the participants. Full adherence to the CR programme was seen in 53% in SC-CR versus 54% in H-CR (relative risk (RR): 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.73–1.32). In H-CR, patients had higher rates of adherence to dietary advice and health education. In SC-CR, 12% of patients did not attend the risk factor evaluation and clinical assessment with their general practitioner. No difference in risk factor improvement was found. Exercise training was declined by 25% in both groups. Conclusion: Adherence to phase II CR was high in both groups. SC-CR did not improve adherence and efficacy, but had comparable effects on medication and risk factors. Thus, SC-CR was safe and effective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Participation in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is poor although CR reduces morbidity and mortality. One way in which attendance may potentially be improved is by involving municipal health-care centres (MHCC) and the patient's general practitioner (GP) to a larger degree in a model of shared care cardiac rehabilitation (SC-CR). Our study tests the feasibility of SC-CR and compares the attendance and effects of SC-CR with the individually tailored hospital-based CR (H-CR) programme., Material and Methods: After admission for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients are randomized to phase II CR which is conducted either as SC-CR or H-CR. During SC-CR the patient is seen once in-hospital after which the GP takes over. MHCC supports the GP by offering educational intervention regarding smoking cessation, exercise, nutrition and mental health. A total of 208 persons hospitalised due to acute coronary syndrome are to be randomized before hospital discharge., Conclusion: The study aims to examine whether the organisation of SC-CR is feasible and provides the expected benefits., Funding: The trial is funded by Region Central Denmark., Trial Registration: Clinical Trials ID: NTC 01522001.

Introduction: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD), including acute myocardial infarction (AMI), is caused by well-known risk factors. They constitute important therapeutic targets, but their predictive value is disputed. We evaluated the effectiveness of the risk scoring system (SCORE) and thresholds for pharmacotherapy re-commended in the European guidelines on CVD prevention., Material and Methods: The medical records of 605 consecutive patients hospitalized for a first AMI were reviewed. Patients with pre-existing CVD, diabetes, or incomplete information on risk factors were excluded. Those not treated with statin before AMI were risk stratified based on risk factors. A SCORE ≥ 5% or ≥ 10% was considered to qualify for preventive medication in young adults (age ≤ 60 years) or elderly (age > 60 years), respectively., Results: Before AMI, 40 (9%) used statin. Among non-statin users, only five of the 109 young adults had a SCORE ≥ 5%, and 23 of the 284 elderly had a SCORE ≥ 10%. Among women, only three elderly qualified for treatment. More than four times more patients would have qualified for treatment with the high-risk country chart used in 2011. The incremental value of the novel high-density lipoprotein adjusted SCORE charts was limited., Conclusion: Few patients admitted with a first AMI used statin. Among non-statin users, SCORE and the recommended thresholds for pharmacotherapy identified no women and less than one out of ten men who untreated were destined for an AMI before 61 years of age. The preventive potential of a traditional risk factor-based health check is limited., Funding: not relevant., Trial Registration: not relevant.

Introduction: The aim was to evaluate the practices of routine management of dyslipidemia performed by general practitioners in a large geographic area., Methodology: Patients were identified by three or more plasma cholesterol measurements registered in the electronic laboratory information system (LIS) covering the total geographic area, and the study population was characterised by information from general practitioners' records, and from a questionnaire sent to the patients. Further information on ischaemic heart disease (IHD) was obtained from the National Hospital register, and information on prescriptions on lipid lowering medications from the National Health Service., Participants: A sample of 1163 subjects, monitored by 134 different general practices., Results: One third of the patients monitored for dyslipidemia had IHD, and two thirds were monitored as part of primary intervention. Dietary counselling was reported by 76%, and 54% were treated with lipid-lowering medications. The treatment frequency was related to cardiovascular risk, increasing from 25% of those with the lowest risk to 72% of the patients with IHD. The treatment goal was not reached in 74% of the cases, but overall a 20% reduction in plasma cholesterol was achieved., Conclusion: Subjects monitored for dyslipidemia were relevantly monitored because of IHD or high risk of IHD, and initiated treatment of dyslipidemia was clearly related to the individual assessed risk of IHD. Only a minority reached the treatment goals (< 5 mmol/l), and the statin doses used were generally lower than the doses used in clinical trials.

Introduction: The aim was to develop a method for continuous monitoring of routine practice of screening and monitoring of dyslipidaemia, and to present the present status of cholesterol screening and monitoring in a large well-defined geographic area in Denmark., Methodology: Population based register survey, based on the electronic laboratory information system (LIS) as primary data source. All lipid measurements from both hospitals and primary health care, were included for a five-year period (1995.8.1.-2000.7.31.), and civil registration number was used to separate measurements from subjects living in an area comprising 248,475 adult inhabitants., Results: An increasing number of subjects was screened every year, and during the five-year period approximately 25% of the total population older than 16 years were screened for dyslipidaemia (61,102), and half the subjects between 60 and 69 years were screened. The proportion of measurements prescribed from general practice increased significantly from 62.2% to 66.8%. The fraction of laboratory request forms including LDL-cholesterol increased from 39.8% to 58.5%. The number of subjects monitored for dyslipidaemia, by three plasma cholesterol measurements during 1 1/2 years increased by 71%., Conclusions: The method adequately identified subjects monitored for dyslipidaemia, and provided important information on routine practice for screening and monitoring of dyslipidaemia.