The prefrontal cortex is implicated in many cognitive functions, including working memory, the temporal organization of behavior, and emotion (Kolb 1984; Goldman-Rakic 1990; Fuster 1997), and also is presumed to have the most dynamic and richest interaction with other brain regions (Fuster 2001). Recent reports have expanded the importance of the rabbit and rodent medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) to hippocampus-dependent motor learning, e.g., trace classical eyeblink conditioning. Since the essential neuronal circuitry for eyeblink conditioning is relatively well characterized, investigating the role of the mPFC in this task may contribute to our understanding of the nature of the mPFC's interaction with other brain areas. Trace eyeblink conditioning is a hippocampus-dependent variation of classical eyeblink conditioning, a process that depends critically on the cerebellum and brainstem (for review, see Thompson et al. 1997). In this paradigm, the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the unconditioned stimulus (US) are separated by a stimulus-free trace interval. Previous studies using permanent lesion methods have revealed that pre-conditioning lesioning of the hippocampus (Solomon et al. 1986; Moyer et al. 1990; McGlinchey-Berroth et al. 1997; Beylin et al. 2001), the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) (Kronforst-Collins and Disterhoft 1998; Weible et al. 2000, 2003; McLaughlin et al. 2002), the entorhinal cortex (Ryou et al. 2001), and the mediodorsal thalamus (Powell and Churchwell 2002) all impair acquisition of the trace eyeblink-conditioned response (CR), suggesting that the circuitry for this learning covers multiple regions of the brain, as others have previously proposed (Weiss and Disterhoft 1996; Green and Woodruff-Pak 2000). Furthermore, this circuitry is reorganized after the CR has been completely acquired. Retention of a recently acquired CR is mediated mainly by the hippocampus (Kim et al. 1995; Takehara et al. 2002, 2003a) and the cerebellum (Woodruff-Pak et al. 1985; Takehara et al. 2003a), but only marginally by the mPFC (Powell et al. 2001; Takehara et al. 2003a). Retention of a remotely acquired CR is mediated by the mPFC and the cerebellum (Takehara et al. 2003a). Although these previous studies using permanent lesion methods have indicated an involvement of the mPFC in trace eyeblink conditioning, this method has only limited utility when we seek a detailed understanding of the participation of the mPFC, because permanent lesions affect not only acquisition, but also consolidation and retrieval. Therefore, further studies that can specify the stage of memory and also elucidate the underlying molecular process are required for a more detailed understanding of the mPFC's precise role. Here we investigated the involvement of the mPFC in mnemonic processes during and after daily conditioning using microinfusion of the γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor agonist muscimol. In addition, we examined the involvement of N-Methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors in this process using microinfusion of the NMDA receptor antagonist 2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (APV), because synaptic plasticity in the prelimbic area of the mPFC depends on NMDA receptors (Hirsch and Crepel 1991; Jay et al. 1995). A preliminary report of some of these data has been presented previously in abstract form (Takehara et al. 2003b).