Search

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate family resilience-defined as the capacity of a family to harness its collective strengths and resources to recover from and adapt to significant adversities or crises effectively-in primary caregivers of children who are deaf and hard of hearing (cDHH) and its association with quality of life, life satisfaction, perceived social support, and loneliness., Method: The study involved 108 primary caregivers of cDHH and 139 primary caregivers of children with normal hearing. Participants underwent psychometric evaluations including the Family Resilience Scale, World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment-Brief Form, Satisfaction with Life Scale, UCLA Loneliness Scale, and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support., Results: Significant differences were found in almost every scale and its subdimension between the two groups ( p < .05). Correlation analysis revealed significant correlations between all scale total scores for both groups ( p < .05, .153 < | r | < .737). Quality of life was found to be a significant predictor of family resilience, F (1, 139) = 41.824, R 2 = .279, B = 0.495, t = 6.467, p < .001., Conclusions: Our study highlights the significant impact of having cDHH on caregivers' family resilience, quality of life, life satisfaction, feelings of loneliness, and perceived social support. The results underscore the importance of enhancing caregivers' quality of life as a potential strategy to improve their family resilience. Further research is needed to understand the complex interplay of factors influencing these outcomes.

Objectives: This study aims to observe the effects of social and demographic factors on the language development of prelingual pediatric cochlear implant patients., Patients and Methods: Between April 2006 and April 2010, 44 children (26 boys, 18 girls; mean age 81.1±16.9 months; range 54 to 115 months) who were prelingually implanted and who had an implant experience of at least 36 months were retrospectively analyzed. Only the patients without mental-motor retardation, cochlear anomaly and revision surgery and who continued their education without any interruption were selected. Receptive and expressive vocabulary tests were performed on these patients. Social and demographic features including gender, implant age, parents' education status and annual income were recorded. The relationship between language development and socio-demographic factors were investigated., Results: Patients implanted before the age of 36 months showed better levels of receptive and expressive language. Children with higher maternal education levels showed significantly better expressive and receptive equivalent language ages. Annual income of the families had significant positive impacts on the language development of the children who were implanted before the age of 36 months., Conclusion: Both expressive and receptive language skills over 36 months of implant experience are significantly associated with age at the time of the implant and socio-economic status of the parents.

Purpose: Topical anesthesia is increasingly being used for cataract surgery. However, it is believed that topical anesthesia causes an increased risk of intraoperative complications from unrestricted eye movement and insufficient pain control and more need for sedation. It is difficult to compare pain and anxiety experienced by individual patients; therefore, the authors used the method of patient-controlled sedation to determine whether there is a difference in sedation requirements under topical or retrobulbar anesthesia., Methods: In this prospective study, patients received either topical anesthesia (n=87) or retrobulbar block (n=104) and self-administered a mixture of midazolam (0.5 mg) and fentanyl (25 microg) in increments using a patient controlled analgesia infuser to achieve sedation. At the end of surgery, patients rated their pain on a 10-point numerical rating scale and their comfort on a 5-point scale. The number of demands and deliveries were noted from the patient controlled analgesia infuser display., Results: Pain scores were between 0 and 2 in 95.4% in the topical and in 94.2% in the retrobulbar group (p>0.05). Patient comfort was equal in both groups with 2.94+/-0.92 in the topical group and 2.92+/-0.99 in the retrobulbar group (p>0.05). Mean sedation requirements were similar in both groups: 26.4% of patients in the topical group and 19.2% in the retrobulbar group did not request any sedation (not significant, p>0.05)., Conclusions: Sedation requirements were similar for cataract surgery under topical and retrobulbar anesthesia.

Purpose: Topical anesthesia is increasingly being used for cataract surgery. However, it is believed that topical anesthesia causes an increased risk of intraoperative complications from unrestricted eye movement and insufficient pain control and more need for sedation. It is difficult to compare pain and anxiety experienced by individual patients; therefore, the authors used the method of patient-controlled sedation to determine whether there is a difference in sedation requirements under topical or retrobulbar anesthesia., Methods: In this prospective study, patients received either topical anesthesia (n=87) or retrobulbar block (n=104) and self-administered a mixture of midazolam (0.5 mg) and fentanyl (25 g) in increments using a patient controlled analgesia infuser to achieve sedation. At the end of surgery, patients rated their pain on a 10-point numerical rating scale and their comfort on a 5-point scale. The number of demands and deliveries were noted from the patient controlled analgesia infuser display., Results: Pain scores were between 0 and 2 in 95.4% in the topical and in 94.2% in the retrobulbar group (p>0.05). Patient comfort was equal in both groups with 2.94 0.92 in the topical group and 2.92 0.99 in the retrobulbar group (p>0.05). Mean sedation requirements were similar in both groups: 26.4% of patients in the topical group and 19.2% in the retrobulbar group did not request any sedation (not significant, p>0.05)., Conclusions: Sedation requirements were similar for cataract surgery under topical and retrobulbar anesthesia. (Eur J Ophthalmol 2004; 14: #-7).

Background: To determine practices of Turkish anaesthesiologists with regard to withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill., Methods: An anonymous questionnaire consisting of 18 questions was mailed to 439 members of the Turkish Society of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation., Results: Three hundred and 69 questionnaires were returned (84% response). Over 90% of the respondents indicated that they were Muslim. We found that 66% of respondents had initiated written or oral do-not-resuscitate orders, most frequently after discussion with colleagues (82%)., Conclusions: While a number of similarities were found between Turkish anaesthesiologists and those from other countries, some specific differences could be identified, particularly related to consensus decision-making and sharing information with other providers and the value of Ethics Committees in the decision-making process.

We compared the antiemetic efficacy of tropisetron versus droperidol in women given tramadol after total hysterectomy. Forty patients were randomly allocated to group 1 (n = 20, tropisetron 0.05 mg/kg intravenously) or group 2 (n = 20, droperidol 15 micrograms/kg intravenously). Tramadol infusion (intravenously), for post-operative analgesia, was started at fascia closure. Incidences of post-operative nausea and vomiting, pain intensity, tramadol use, and the need for a rescue antiemetic (metoclopramide 10 mg) were recorded 0 h, 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h and 48 h post-operatively. Vomiting and nausea incidences were reported fewer in group 1 than in group 2, but statistical significance was only reached for vomiting incidence 6 h post-operation. Tropisetron seems to have better antiemetic properties than droperidol in patients receiving tramadol because of the length of its duration of action. Further studies, investigating alternative ways of managing post-operative nausea and vomiting, and the use of tramadol for post-operative analgesia, are needed.