Search

Machine Learning (ML) algorithms are increasingly used as surrogate models to increase the efficiency of stochastic reliability analyses in geotechnical engineering. This paper presents a highly efficient ML aided reliability technique that is able to accurately predict the results of a Monte Carlo (MC) reliability study, and yet performs 500 times faster. A complete MC reliability analysis on anisotropic heterogeneous slopes consisting of 120,000 simulated samples is conducted in parallel to the proposed ML aided stochastic technique. Comparing the results of the complete MC study and the proposed ML aided technique, the expected errors of the proposed method are realistically examined. Circumventing the time-consuming computation of factors of safety for the training datasets, the proposed technique is more efficient than previous methods. Different ML models, including Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) are presented, optimised and compared. The effects of the size and type of training and testing datasets are discussed. The expected errors of the ML predicted probability of failure are characterised by different levels of soil heterogeneity and anisotropy. Using only 1% of MC samples to train ML surrogate models, the proposed technique can accurately predict the probability of failure with mean errors limited to 0.7%. The proposed technique reduces the computational time required for our study from 306 days to only 14 hours, providing 500 times higher efficiency.

Random field Monte Carlo (MC) reliability analysis is a robust stochastic method to determine the probability of failure. This method, however, requires a large number of numerical simulations demanding high computational costs. This paper explores the efficiency of different machine learning (ML) algorithms used as surrogate models trained on a limited number of random field slope stability simulations in predicting the results of large datasets. The MC data in this paper require only the examination of failure or non-failure, circumventing the time-consuming calculation of factors of safety. An extensive dataset is generated, consisting of 120,000 finite difference MC slope stability simulations incorporating different levels of soil heterogeneity and anisotropy. The Bagging Ensemble, Random Forest and Support Vector classifiers are found to be the superior models for this problem amongst 9 different models and ensemble classifiers. Trained only on 0.47% of data (500 samples), the ML model can classify the entire 120,000 samples with an accuracy of %85 and AUC score of %91. The performance of ML methods in classifying the random field slope stability results generally reduces with higher anisotropy and heterogeneity of soil. The ML assisted MC reliability analysis proves a robust stochastic method where errors in the predicted probability of failure using %5 of MC data is only %0.46 in average. The approach reduced the computational time from 306 days to less than 6 hours.